点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:1254
2016年第4期   DOI:10.22217/upi.2015.052
墨尔本“棕地”再开发的监管体系与制度设计
Regulatory System and Institutional Design for Brownfield Redevelopment in Melbourne

吴昊 秦波 杨璟名

Wu Hao, Qin Bo, Yang Jingming

关键词:棕地;监管体系;利益相关者;墨尔本

Keywords:Brownfield; Regulatory System; Stake-holder; Melbourne

摘要:

经过30多年高速城市化,如何合理使用“存量资源”、再开发棕地成为我国城市下阶段必须面对的挑战。基于西方国家现有经验和教训,我们不能在房地产开发的压力下,对棕地潜在的环境危害视而不见;但在人多地少的基本国情下,同样不能因噎废食,弃之不用。为此,亟需建立一套系统、科学的监管体系,推动安全、有序、高效的棕地再开发。基于对文献和实践的梳理,本文以墨尔本为研究案例,收集其市区大型棕地开发项目,对其监管体系和所涉及的利益相关者进行制度分析,以期为我国建立棕地监管体系提供借鉴。研究表明,对建设开发过程进行制度化监管是确保和推动墨尔本棕地再开发的关键,而在对棕地进行详细分类与前置审批的过程中,规划机构应起到核心作用。虽有国情差异,国际棕地再开发监管体系与制度设计对我国城市颇具借鉴意义。

Abstract:

After 30 years’ urban growth the scarcity of China’s urban land resource has gradually become apparent. One of the main challenges that Chinese cities face is the effective reuse of urban brownfield sites. The history of industrial nations, suggests the impossibility of ignoring the social cost of urban brownfields, yet this needs not prevent their responsible reuse. The key is to build an effective regulatory system to guide brownfield redevelopment. This study identifies major brownfield residential projects located in the inner-Melbourne area. It identifies regulation framework, linkage and actors, aiming to assist institutional design to guide brownfield redevelopment in Chinese cities. Research findings show that a properly designed effective regulation system is the key to balance brownfield reuse in Melbourne. Planning agency plays a key role in brownfield redevelopment.

版权信息:
基金项目:
作者简介:

吴昊,博士,墨尔本大学建筑学院,高级讲师。haow@unimelb.edu.au
秦波(通信作者),博士,中国人民大学公共管理学院,教授。qinbo@vip.sina.com
杨璟名,硕士,SIM Development Pty Ltd, 规划师。poppy@hlid.com.au

译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] de Sousa, Turning C A. Brownfields into Green Space in the City of Toronto[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 62: 181-198.
    [2] Alker S, Joy V, Roberts P, Smith N. The Definition of Brownfield[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2000, 43: 49-69.
    [3] Ganser R, Williams K. Brownfield Development: Are We Using the Right Targets? Evidence from England and Germany[J]. European Planning Studies, 2007, 15: 603-622.
    [4] Dixon T. Integrating Sustainability into Brownfield Regeneration: Rhetoric or Reality[J]. Journal of Property Research, 2006, 23: 237-67.
    [5] Adams D, Watkins C. Greenfields, Brownfields and Housing Development[M]. Oxford, England: Blackwell Science, 2002.
    [6] Xie J, Li F. Overview of the Current Situation on Brownfield Remediation and Development in China[R]. The World Bank, September 2010.
    [7] Wu H, Chen C. A Pilot Case Study of Brownfield High-density Housing Development in China[J]. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 2010, 3: 119-131.
    [8] Wu H, Chen C. A Pilot Case Study of Inner-city High-density Housing on Brownfield in Chongqing, China[C]. The 16th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference 24-27 January 2010.
    [9] Blum E D. Love Canal Revisited: Race, Class, and Gender in Environmental Activism[M]. Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 2008.
    [10] Day Jared N, Lisa Johnson. Clean Sites and Toxic Burdens: The Evolution and Legacy of New Jersey’s Mandatory Toxic Waste Cleanup Program, 1976-1993[J]. The Journal of Policy History, 2004, 16(3): 239-267.
    [11] Li X. Brownfields in China: How Cities Recycle Industrial Land[D]. MIT Dissertation, 2011.
    [12] 周聪惠. 美国“超级基金”制度研究:探索污染土地修复中的用地规划协调途径[J]. 国际城市规划, 2013, 28(6): 89-95.
    [13] de Sousa, C A. Brownfields Redevelopment and the Quest for Sustainability[M]. Boston, MA: Elsevier, 2008.
    [14] Syms P. Previously Developed Land: Industrial Activities and Contamination[M]. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2004.
    [15] Building Design. Prince Puts Pound 1bn into Urban Regeneration[J]. Building Design, 2008, 3.
    [16] Baing A S. Containing Urban Sprawl? Comparing Brownfield Reuse Policies in England and Germany[J]. International Planning Studies, 2010, 15(1): 25-35.
    [17] Syms P, Weber B R. International Approaches to the Valuation of Land and Property Affected by Contamination[R]. London, RICS Foundation, 2003.
    [18] Logan M I. Capital City Manufacturing in Australia[J]. Economic Geography, 1966, 42(2): 139-151.
    [19] Byrne J, MacCallum D. Bordering on Neglect: ‘Environmental Justice’ in Australian Planning[J]. Australian Planner, 2013, 50(2): 164-173.
    [20] Munchenberg S. Judicial Review and the Commonwealth Environment Protection (Impact of Proposals) Act 1974[J]. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 1994: 461-478.
    [21] Fowler R J. Environmental Impact Assessment: What Role for the Commonwealth? An Overview[J]. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 1996: 246-259.
    [22] Chan N. The Impact of Environmental Planning on the Value of Contaminated Land[J]. Australian Land Economics Review, 1999, 5(1): 8-20.
    [23] Norberry J. Australian Pollution Laws – Offences, Penalties and Regulatory Agencies[C]. Australian Institute of Criminology “Environmental Crime” Conference, 1993.
    [24] Cao K, Guan H. Brownfield Redevelopment Toward Sustainable Urban Land Use in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2007, 17: 127-134.

《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7763780