Rational Inconsistency and Reasoning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v14i1.2521Keywords:
reasoning, reductio ad absurdum, inconsistency, paraconsistency, conflict, rationalityAbstract
Nicholas Rescher has argued we must tolerate inconsistency because of our cognitive limitations. He has also produced, together with R. Brandom, a serious attempt at exploring the logic of inconsistency. Inconsistency tolerance calls for a systematic rewriting of our logical doctrines: it requires a paraconsistent logic. However, having given up all aggregation of premises, Rescher's proposal for a paraconsistenl logic fails to account for the reductive reasoning Rescher appeals to in his account of inconsistency tolerance. A non-adjunctive logic developed by P.K. Schotch and RE. Jennings provides just what Rescher's logic is lacking: It allows a tolerant attitude toward inconsistency while giving an account of reductive reasoning.Downloads
Published
1992-01-01
Issue
Section
Articles