Maintaining Equitable and Inclusive Classroom Communities Online During the COVID-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v15i2.6683Abstract
This paper explores the ways in which face-to-face classroom communities were disrupted and/or transformed by the move to online platforms and the effect of this disruption on equitable access to a quality education. Quality education is defined as engaged pedagogy, where students learn to interact with other students and engage with ideas in a way that promotes their ability to be part of a community while still feeling free to disagree with, critique, and take care of each other. To examine the extent to which such communities were created when schooling migrated online during the pandemic, this paper examines online schooling communities in terms of sense of belonging, trust, shared purpose, and quality of interactions. The analysis of the experiences of 11 teachers in Ontario, Canada, whose face-to-face classes were moved to online formats, establishes that equity was one of the first casualties of the change, with the most vulnerable students facing disproportionate academic, psychological, and social consequences.
References
Barrett, S. E. (2013). Becoming an activist science teacher: A longitudinal study of an induction intervention. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 17(4). https://ejrsme.icrsme.com/article/view/11994
Baturay, M. H. (2011). Relationships among sense of classroom community, perceived cognitive learning and satisfaction of students at an e-learning course. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(5), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494821003644029
Bempechat, J., Jimenez-Silva, M., Li, J., & Holloway, S. D. (2019). Classes where "kids learn/don't learn a lot": A study of Mexican-American adolescents' voices. In S. P. Jones & E. C. Sheffield (Eds.), Why kids love (and hate) school: Reflections on practice (pp. 55–76). Myers Education Press.
Benner, A. D., & Wang, Y. (2014). Demographic marginalization, social integration, and adolescents’ educational success. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(10), 1611–1627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0151-6
Biesta, G. (2012). Giving teaching back to education: Responding to the disappearance of the teacher. Phenomenlogy & Practice, 6(2), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.29173/pandpr19860
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Drysdale, J., Graham, C., & Borup, J. (2016). Teacher and student perspectives on facilitating a sense of community through an online high school’s “Shepherding” program. International Journal on E-Learning, 15(2), 149–177.
Farinde-Wu, A., & Fitchett, P. G. (2018). Searching for satisfaction: Black female teachers' workplace climate and job satisfaction. Urban Education, 53(1), 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916648745
Farmer, T., & West, R. (2019). Exploring the concerns of online K–12 teachers. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5(1), 97–118. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/184482/
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans. New Rev. 20th-Anniversary ed.). Continuum.
Gherhes, V., Simon, S., & Para, I. (2021). Analysing students’ reasons for keeping their webcams on or off during online classes. Sustainability, 13(6), 3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063203
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
James, C. E. (2012). Life at the intersection: Community, class and schooling. Fernwood Pub.
Kaser, J., & Hauk, S. (2016). To be or not to be an online math instructor? MathAMATYC Educator, 7(3), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1063346
King, A. (2020, April 6). What you need to know about Ontario's at-home learning program, which launches today. CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-at-home-learning-program-launches-today-1.5522788
McKnight, L. (2018). Curriculum as colour and curves: A synthesis of Black theory, design and creativity realised as critical curriculum writing. Gender and Education, 30(2), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1225010
Miller, s. (2018). Reframing schooling to liberate gender identity. Multicultural Perspectives, 20(2), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2018.1447067
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2021). Education facts, 2019–2020 (Preliminary). http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/educationFacts.html
Rakes, G. C., & Dunn, K. E. (2015). Teaching online: Discovering teacher concerns. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(4), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1063346
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79
Sikhangezile, N., & Modise, M. A. (2020). Social distancing, cultural and psychological effects on learners in a rural setting in Zimbabwe. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(3), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/503
Sims, J., & Coley, R. L. (2019). Variations in links between educational success and health: Implications for enduring health disparities. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 25(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000239
Tartavulea, C. V., Albu, C. N., Albu, N., Dieaconescu, R. I., & Petre, S. (2020). Online teaching practices and the effectiveness of the educational process in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(55), 920–936. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2020/55/920
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Falmer Press.
Waterman, S. J., Lowe, S. C., & Shotton, H. J. (Eds.). (2018). Beyond access: Indigenizing programs for Native American student success. Stylus Publishing.
Young, J. L., Feille, K. K., & Young, J. R. (2017). Black girls as learners and doers of science: A single-group summary of elementary science achievement. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 1–20. https://erjrsme.icrsme.com/article/view/16953
Yu, S., & Yuizono, T. (2021). Opening the ‘black box’ of cooperative learning in face-to-face versus computer-supported learning in the time of COVID-19. Education Sciences, 11(3), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030102
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Sarah Elizabeth Barrett
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By virtue of their publication in this open access journal, articles are free to use with proper attribution (to both the author(s) and the Journal of Teaching and Learning) for educational and other non-commercial uses.
