Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T20:19:25.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dissolving International Politics: Reflections on the Nation-State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Wolfram F. Hanrieder
Wolfram F. Hanrieder*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The diminishing salience of territorial issues, the restraints imposed by the nuclear balance, the shift away from the primacy of military-strategic elements of power to the primacy of economic elements, the day-to-day realities of economic interdependence, and changes in the nature of the nation-state have produced a new international order which resembles in important ways the domestic political systems prevalent in the industrialized noncommunist part of the world. This leads to the “domestication” of international politics. At the same time competitive nationalism, the vitality of the nation-state, differing perceptions of the proper role of government in the economy, and other considerations allow not much more than a tenuous coordination of foreign policies even among similar nation-states, making it unlikely that the European Economic Community and the Atlantic alliance will proceed beyond existing structures toward tighter integration.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 72 , Issue 4 , December 1978 , pp. 1276 - 1287
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, Daniel (1977). “The Future World Disorder: The Structural Context of Crises.” Foreign Policy 27):109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Cyril E. (1966). The Dynamics of Modernization. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Chaliand, Gerard (1977). Revolution in the Third World. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Frank, Isaiah and Hirono, Ryokichi, eds. (1974). How the United States and Japan See Each Other's Economy: An Exchange of Views Between the American and Japanese Committees for Economic Development. New York: Committee for Economic Development.Google Scholar
Frohlich, Norman and Oppenheimer, Joe A. (1972). “Entrepreneurial Politics and Foreign Policy.” World Politics 24, Supplement: 151–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis (1977). “Containment: A Reassessment.” Foreign Affairs 55):873–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanrieder, Wolfram F., ed. (1971). Comparative Foreign Policy: Theoretical Essays. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
Hanrieder, Wolfram F. (1967). “Compatibility and Consensus: A Proposal for the Conceptual Linkage of External and Internal Dimensions of Foreign Policy.” American Political Science Review 61:971–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Roger D. (1973). “European Integration: Forward March, Parade Rest, or Dismissed?” International Organization 27):225–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Jack and Watson, Michael, eds. (1975). Planning, Politics and Public Policy: The British, French, and Italian Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, Arnold J. and Heclo, Hugh and Adams, Carolyn Teich (1976). Comparative Public Policy: The Politics of Social Choice in Europe and America. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Herz, John H. (1957). “The Rise and Demise of the Territorial State.” World Politics 9):473–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, John H. (1968). “The Territorial State Revisited—Reflections on the Future of the Nation-State.” Polity 1):11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley (1974). “Toward a Common European Foreign Policy?” In Hanrieder, Wolfram (ed.), The United States and Western Europe: Political, Economic and Strategic Perspectives. Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Karl (1967). “The U.S. and the EEC in the Atlantic System: The Problem of Theory.” Journal of Common Market Studies 5):338–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (1976). “International Relations and Domestic Structures: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States.” International Organization 30):1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1972). “Are Bureaucracies Important?” Foreign Policy 7):159–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Lawrence B. (1967). European Economic Integration and the United States. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Leon N. and Scheingold, Stuart A. (1970). Europe's Would-Be Polity. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. (1977). Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. (1964). “American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory.” World Politics 16):677–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttwak, Edward N. (1977). “Defense Reconsidered.” Commentary 63):51–58.Google Scholar
Morse, Edward L. (1976). Modernization and the Transformation of International Relations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ripley, Randall B. and Franklin, Grace A. (1976). Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1964). The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schmiegelow, Henrik and Schmiegelow, Michele (1975). “The New Mercantilism in International Relations: The Case of France's External Monetary Policy.” International Organization 29:367–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. Harrison (1974). “Dissolving the State: Three Recent Perspectives on International Relations.” InternationalOrganization 28):435–66.Google Scholar
Wallace, Helen and Wallace, William and Webb, Carole, eds. (1977). Policy-Making in the European Communities. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wallace, William (1976). “Issue Linkage Among Atlantic Governments.” International Affairs 52):163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar