Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T03:32:52.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soviet Political Culture and “Covert Participation” in Policy Implementation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Wayne DiFranceisco  and
Zvi Gitelman
Wayne DiFranceisco
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan
Zvi Gitelman
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our study of political participation in the Soviet Union, based on interviews with recent emigres, leads us to conclude that Soviet political culture is neither a “subject” nor a “subject-participant” one. There are meaningful forms of participation in the system, but they take place either outside the nominally participatory institutions, or within those institutions but in nonprescribed ways. The citizen may participate covertly, utilizing unsanctioned or blatantly illegal methods in attempts to influence policy implementation, not policymaking. The findings support the concept that traditional, prerevolutionary modes of citizen-state interactions are reinforced by the pattern of Soviet socioeconomic development and by a highly centralized and hierarchical administrative structure, itself a continuation of tsarist patterns. This study describes how different types of Soviet citizens try to influence policy implementation, and how they differentiate among the bureaucracies. Analysis of this activity leads us to reformulate our conception of Soviet political culture.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 78 , Issue 3 , December 1983 , pp. 603 - 621
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aliev, G.Interview. Literaturnaia gazeta, 11 18, 1981, p. 10.Google Scholar
Almond, G. A.The intellectual history of the civic culture concept. In Almond, G. A. & Verba, S. (Eds.), The civic culture revisited. Boston: Little, Brown, 1980, 1–36.Google Scholar
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S.The civic culture. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Azarova, E.O zashchite pensionnykh prav grazhdan. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 1979, 2, 44–49.Google Scholar
Barghoorn, F. C.Politics in the USSR (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown, 1972.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L.Culture, communication, and political control. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., 08 18, 1980.Google Scholar
Bialer, S.Stalin's successors. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Brown, A., & Gray, J. (Eds.), Political culture and political change in Communist states (2nd ed.). New York: Holmes and Meier, 1979.Google Scholar
Buachidze, T.Protektsiia. Literaturnaia gazeta, 01 8, 1975, p. 12.Google Scholar
Connor, W. D., & Gitelman, Z. (Eds.), Public opinion in European socialist systems. New York: Praeger, 1977.Google Scholar
Dzhafarli, T. M.Izuchenie obshchestvennogo mneniia— neobkhodimoe uslovie priniatiia pravil'nykh reshenii. Sotsiologicheskie isstedovanie, 1978, 1, 69–75.Google Scholar
Falkenheim, V.Political participation in China. Problems of Communism, 1978, 27, 18–32.Google Scholar
Filatov, V.Plemianniki: k chemu privodit protektsiia pri prieme v voennoe uchilishche. Krasnaia zvezda, 11 12, 1980, p. 2.Google Scholar
Friedgut, T. H.Political participation in the USSR. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Gitelman, Z.Becoming Israelis: political resocialization of Soviet and American immigrants. New York: Praeger, 1982.Google Scholar
Gray, J.Conclusion. In Brown, A. & Gray, J. (Eds.), Political culture and political change in Communist states (2nd ed.). New York: Holmes and Meier, 1979, 251–272.Google Scholar
Hasenfeld, Y.Client-organization relations: a systems perspective. In Sarri, R. & Hasenfeld, Y. (Eds.), The management of human services. New York: Columbia University Press, 1978, 184–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasenfeld, Y., & Steinmetz, D.Client-official encounters in social service agencies. In Goodsell, C. (Ed.), The public encounter: delivering human services in the 1980s. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1981, 83–101.Google Scholar
Hough, J.Political participation in the Soviet Union. Soviet Studies, 1976, 28, 3–20.Google Scholar
Hough, J., & Fainsod, M.How the Soviet Union is governed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Inkeles, A., & Bauer, R.The Soviet citizen. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Jowitt, K.An organizational approach to the study of political culture in Marxist-Leninist systems. American Political Science Review, 1974, 68, 1171–1191.Google Scholar
Katz, E., & Danet, B.Bureaucracy and the public. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar
Kiselev, V. P.O povyshenii deistvennosti prava v bor'be s protektsionizmom. Sotsiologicheskie Isstedovanie, 1981, 1, 151–154.Google Scholar
Loginova, N.Chervi kozyri. Literaturnaia gazeta, 01 23, 1980.Google Scholar
Morton, H.Who gets what, when and how? housing in the Soviet Union. Soviet Studies, 1980, 32, 235–259.Google Scholar
Odom, W.A dissenting view on the group approach to Soviet politics. World Politics, 1976, 28, 542–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odom, W.The Soviet volunteers. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Oliver, J.Citizen demands and the Soviet political system. American Political Science Review, 1969, 62, 465–475.Google Scholar
Prikhodko, D. N., & Pan, V. V.Obrazovanie i sot-sial'nyi status lichnosti: tendentsii internatsional-izatsii i dukhovnaia kultura. Tomsk: izdatel'stvo Tomskogo Universiteta, 1974.Google Scholar
Sadowski, C.The fragile link: citizen voluntary association and polity in People's Poland. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Sociology, The University of Michigan, 1979.Google Scholar
Schulz, D., & Adams, J.Political participation in communist systems. New York: Pergamon Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Sharlet, R.Concept formation in political science and communist studies: conceptualizing political participation. Canadian Slavic Studies, 1967, 1, 640–649.Google Scholar
Skilling, H. D., & Griffiths, F.Interest groups in Soviet politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Tarasova, V. A.Okhrana subiektivnykh prav grazh-danin v oblasti pensionnogo obespecheniia. Sovet-skoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 1976, 5, 133–136.Google Scholar
Tosunian, I.Vot dozhivem do pensii. Literaturnaia gazeta, 09 30, 1981.Google Scholar
Troyan, S.They never arrived for their assigned jobs. Izvestiia, June 11, 1980, 3. Translated in Current Digest of the Soviet Press 07 9, 1980, 32, 16–17.Google Scholar
Trud, 10 16, 1980, p. 4.Google Scholar
Uchitel'skaia gazeta, 01 15, 1980, p. 2.Google Scholar
Unger, A.Political participation in the USSR: YCL and CPSU. Soviet Studies, 1981, 33, 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, S., & Nie, N.Participation in America. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.Google Scholar
Verbitsky, A.Vziatki, vziatki, vziatki. Novoe Russkoe slovo, 08 4, 1981, p. 2.Google Scholar
White, S.Political culture and Soviet politics. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1979 (a).Google Scholar
White, S.The USSR: patterns of autocracy and industrialism. In Brown, A. & Gray, J. (Eds.), Political culture and political change in Communist states (2nd ed.). New York: Holmes and Meier, 1979 (b), pp. 25–65.Google Scholar
Wiatr, J.The civic culture from a Marxist-sociological perspective. In Almond, G. A. & Verba, S. (Eds.), The civic culture revisited. Boston: Little, Brown, 1980, pp. 103–123.Google Scholar