Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T18:57:57.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partisan Instability in Canada: Evidence from a New Panel Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Lawrence LeDuc ,
Harold D. Clarke ,
Jane Jenson  and
Jon H. Pammett
Lawrence LeDuc
Affiliation:
University of Windsor
Harold D. Clarke
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute andState University
Jane Jenson
Affiliation:
Carleton University
Jon H. Pammett
Affiliation:
Carleton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the critical questions in the debate about the concept of party identification is its stability over time, particularly its stability relative to that of voting behavior. This article utilizes data from a new three-wave panel study to assess the properties of party identification in Canada, and to compare levels of partisan stability in Canada with those in Great Britain and the United States. In addition to directional stability, other features of the party identification concept and its applicability to Canada are examined, notably the constituency of identification across levels of the federal system. Analyses indicate that party identification in Canada is subject to considerable fluctuation, and that the U.S. pattern of relatively stable party identification coupled with substantial short-term swings in voting behavior reflect the institutional characteristics of the U. S. electoral system. The article concludes by suggesting that patterns of partisanship in Canada, although distinctive in certain respects, probably have important commonalities with those in many other contemporary liberal democracies.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , June 1984 , pp. 470 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitkin, D.Stability and change in Australian politics. Canberra: Australian National University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Aitkin, D., & Kahan, M.Australia: class politics in the new world. In Rose, R. (Ed.). Electoral behavior: a comparative handbook. New York: Free Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Budge, I., Crewe, I., & Farlie, D. (Eds.). Party identification and beyond. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
Butler, D., & Stokes, D.Political change in Britain. London: Macmillan, 1969.Google Scholar
Cain, B. E.Dynamic and static components of political support in Britain. American Journal of Political Science, 1978, 22, 849–866.Google Scholar
Cain, B. E., & Ferejohn, J.A comparison of party identification in the United States and Great Britain. Comparative Political Studies, 1981, 14, 31–47.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D.The American voter. New York: Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D.Elections and the political order. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
Clarke, H. D.The Parti Québécois and sources of partisan realignment in contemporary Quebec. Journal of Politics, 1983, 45, 64–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, H. D., Jenson, J., LeDuc, L., & Pammett, J.Political choice in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1979.Google Scholar
Clarke, H. D., & Stewart, M. C.Dealignment of degree: partisan change in Britain, 1974-83. Revised version of a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia, 11 1982.Google Scholar
Converse, P.On the possibility of major political realignment in the South. In Campbell, A.et al., Elections and the political order. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
Converse, P., & Markus, G.Plus ça change … the new CPS election study panel. American Political Science Review, 1979, 73, 32–49.Google Scholar
Crewe, I., Alt, J., & Sarlvik, B.Partisan dealignment in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 1977, 7, 121–190.Google Scholar
Eldersveld, S., & Kubota, A.Party identification in India and Japan in the context of western theory and research. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Montreal, 08, 1973.Google Scholar
Epstein, L. D.Political parties in western democracies. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1980.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M.P.Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Gutek, B.On the accuracy of retrospective attitudinal data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1978, 42, 390–401.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R.Changing paradigms in comparative political behavior. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, 09, 1982.Google Scholar
Irvine, W.Explaining the brittleness of partisanship in Canada. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Edmonton, 06, 1975.Google Scholar
Irvine, W., & Gold, H.Do frozen cleavages ever go stale? British Journal of Political Science, 1980, 10, 213–225.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. E.Issues, party choices and presidential votes. American Journal of Political Science, 1975, 19, 161–185.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R.Generations and politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R.Party identification at multiple levels of government. American Journal of Sociology, 1966, 72, 92–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenson, J.Party loyalty in Canada: the question of party identification. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1975, 8, 543–553.Google Scholar
Jenson, J.Party strategy and party identification. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1976, 9, 27–48.Google Scholar
Ladd, E. C. Jr., & Hadley, C. D.Transformations of the American party system. New York: Norton, 1978.Google Scholar
LeDuc, L.The dynamic properties of party identification: a four nation comparison. European Journal of Political Research, 1981, 9, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDuc, L.Is there life after dealignment?: Partisan change in Canada, Great Britain, and the United States. Presented at the workshop on electoral behavior, European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions, Freiburg, West Germany, 03 1983.Google Scholar
LeDuc, L.Canada: the politics of stable dealignment. In Beck, P. A., Dalton, R., & Flanagan, S. (Eds.). Electoral change in industrial democracies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
LeDuc, L., Clarke, H., Jenson, J., & Pammett, J.A national sample design. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1974, 7, 701–708.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S.Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments. In Lipset, S. M. & Rokkan, S. (Eds.). Party systems and voter alignments. New York: Free Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M.Political man: the social bases of politics. (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Markus, G. B.The political environment and the dynamics of public attitudes: a panel study. American Journal of Political Science, 1982, 23, 338–359.Google Scholar
Markus, G. B.Political attitudes during an election year: a report on the 1980 NES panel study. American Political Science Review, 1982, 76, 538–560.Google Scholar
Markus, G. B., & Converse, P.A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 1979, 73, 1055–1070.Google Scholar
Meisel, J.Working papers in Canadian politics. Montreal: McGill-Queen's Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Miller, W.The cross national use of party identification as a stimulus to political inquiry. In Budge, I., Crewe, I., & Farlie, D. (Eds.). Party identification and beyond. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
Nie, N., Verba, S., & Petrocik, J.The changing American voter. (Enlarged, ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Niemi, R., Katz, R., & Newman, D.Reconstructing past partisanship: the failure of the party identification recall questions. American Journal of Political Science, 1980, 24, 633–651.Google Scholar
Page, B. I., & Jones, C. C.Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties and the vote. American Political Science Review, 1979, 73, 1071–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R. (Ed.). Electoral behavior: a comparative handbook. New York: Free Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Shively, W. P.The development of party identification among adults: exploration of a functional model. American Political Science Review, 1979, 73, 1039–1054.Google Scholar
Sniderman, P., Forbes, H. D., & Melzer, I.Party loyalty and electoral volatility. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1974, 7, 268–288.Google Scholar
Thomassen, J.Party identification as a cross-national concept: its meaning in the Netherlands. In Budge, I., Crewe, I., & Farlie, D. (Eds.). Party identification and beyond, 1976.Google Scholar
Wallas, G.Human nature in politics. London: Constable, 1920.Google Scholar
Weir, B.The distortion of voter recall. American Journal of Political Science, 1975, 19, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar