Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-13T17:42:31.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Victims of Circumstances: Women in Pursuit of Political Office

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Timothy Bledsoe
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
Mary Herring
Affiliation:
Wayne State University

Abstract

Women have long faced special barriers in their efforts to gain election to political office. We show that the hurdles women encounter go beyond the often-described familial responsibilities and occupational disadvantages to include perceptual and political barriers unique to women. Using a two-wave, five-year panel of people serving on city councils, we find women likely to pursue higher office only under particular conditions—conditions that seem to matter little to men. Additionally, the success of women in pursuing higher office is more closely tied to the circumstances in which they find themselves than is the success of men. We suggest that the motivational circumstances of women and men in pursuing a political career are more complex than previously assumed. It is not just that men and women differ in their career attitudes and perceptions but that these attitudes and perceptions have different meaning for the two sexes.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, J. W. 1958. Motives in Fantasy, Action, and Society. Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 1985a. “Political Elites and Sex Differences in Political Ambition: A Reconsideration.” Journal of Politics 47: 1231–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 1985b. Women As Candidates in American Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Crandall, Virginia C. 1969. “Achievement.” In Child Psychology, the Sixty-Second Yearbook of the NSSE, ed. Stevenson, Harold W.. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
Diamond, Irene. 1977. Sex Roles in the State House. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Eccles, Jacquelynne S. 1987. “Gender Roles and Women's Achievement-related Decisions.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 11: 135–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Daniel H. Jr., 1987. Applied Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Githens, Marianne, and Prestage, Jewel. 1977. A Portrait of Marginality: The Political Behavior of American Women. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Hacker, Helen. 1951. “Women As a Minority Group.” Social Forces 30: 6069.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Jeane. 1976. The New Presidential Elite. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Lynn, Naomi, and Flora, Cornelia, 1977. “Societal Punishment and Aspects of Female Political Participation.” In A Portrait of Marginality: The Political Behavior of American Women, ed. Githens, Marianne and Prestage, Jewel. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
McClellan, David C. 1961. The Achieving Society. Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Messé, Lawrence A., and Barbara, Watts. 1980. “Self-pay Behavior: Sex Differences in Reliance on External Cues and Feelings of Comfort.” Academic Psychology Bulletin 2: 8388.Google Scholar
Ruble, Thomas L. 1983. “Sex Stereotypes: Issues of Change in the 1970s.” Sex Roles 9: 397402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1982. “Private Costs of Public Commitments or Public Costs of Private Commitments: Family Roles Versus Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 2: 265–79.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1983. The Political Integration of Women. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar