Abstract
The diverse inflorescence morphology of species in the Pithecellobium-complex is shown to be a result of: 1) the organization of the components of the inflorescence and their relative positions; 2) the hierarchical relationship of the axes of the inflorescences and the position they assume in total tree architecture; and 3) heterochronic development of the components of the inflorescence. It is shown that the typological system of nomenclature of inflorescences leads to false assumptions of homology and therefore must be discarded. The morphology of inflorescences is discussed in terms of metamerism, and the term Repeating Growth Unit (RGU) is introduced and is defined as the smallest complete sequence of metamers produced by a meristem. A module is defined as the sequence of RGUs produced by a meristem. An inflorescence is defined as that sequence of metamers in an RGU which participates in the production and/or presentation of flowers and fruit. Heterochrony, proleptic and sylleptic buds, and shoot dimorphism are discussed and their role in modifying inflorescence morphology in the Pithecellobium-complex is illustrated. Examples from the Pithecellobium-complex are provided which demonstrate the various modifications of the inflorescence that result from the interaction of these various phenomena.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Barlow, P. W. 1989. Meristems, metamers and modules and the development of shoot and root systems. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 100: 255–279.
Borchert, R. 1969. Unusual shoot-growth pattern in a tropical tree, Oreopanax (Araliaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 56: 1033–1041.
Briggs, B. G. & L. A. S. Johnson. 1979. Evolution in the Myrtaceae—evidence from inflorescence structure. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales 102: 157–256.
Claßen-Bockhoff, R., J. A. Armstrong & M. Ohligschläger. 1991. The inflorescences of the Australian genera Diplolaena R. Br. and Chorilaena Endl. (Rutaceae). Austral. J. Bot. 39: 31–42.
Derstine, K. S. & S. C. Tucker. 1991. Organ initiation and development of inflorescences and flowers of Acacia baileyana. Amer. J. Bot. 78: 816–832.
Doak, C. C. 1935. Evolution of foliar types, dwarf shoots, and cone scales of Pinus. Univ. Illinois Bull. 32: 1–106.
Esau, K. 1954. Primary vascular differentiation in plants. Biol. Rev. 29: 46–86.
Fink, S. 1983. The occurrence of adventitious and preventitious buds within the bark of some temperate and tropical trees. Amer. J. Bot. 70: 523–542.
Fisher, J. B. 1977. A quantitative study of Terminalia branching. Pages 285–320. In: P. B. Tomlinson & M. H. Zimmerman, editors. Tropical trees as living systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Fisher, J. B. & D. E. Hibbs. 1982. Plasticity of tree architecture: specific and ecological variations found in Aubreville’s model. Amer. J. Bot. 69: 690–702.
Gaudichaud, C. 1841. Recherches generales sur l’organographie, la physiologie et l’organogénie des végétaux. Compt. Rend. Hebd. S’eances Acad. Sci. 12: 627–637.
Gould, S. J. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
Gray, A. 1849. On the composition of the plant by phytons, and some applications of phyllotaxis. Proc. Amer. Assoc. Advancem. Sci. 1849: 438–444.
Halle, F. 1979. Architectural variation at the specific level in tropical trees. Pages 209–221. In: P. B. Tomlinson & M. H. Zimmerman, editors. Tropical trees as living systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hallé, F. & R. A. A. Oldeman. 1970. Essai sur l’architecture et la dynamique de croissance des arbres tropicaux. Masson & Co., Paris.
Hallé, F., R. A. A. Oldeman & P. B. Tomlinson. 1978. Tropical trees and forests: an architectural analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Holttum, R. E. 1953. Evolutionary trends in an equatorial climate. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 7: 159–173.
Jackson, B. D. 1928. A dictionary of botanic terms. Gerald Duckworth & Co., London.
Jones, M. 1985. Modular demography and form in Silver Birch. Pages 223–237. In: J. White, editor. Studies on plant demography. Academic Press, London.
Kalin-Arroyo, M. T. 1981. Breeding systems and pollination biology in Leguminosae. Pages 723–769. In: R. M. Polhill & P. H. Raven, editors. Advances in legume systematics. Vol. 2. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Kirchoff, B. K. 1991. Heterochrony, heterotopy and homeosis in flowering plants. Amer. J. Bot. 78(no. 6, suppl.): 15.
Koriba, K. 1958. On the periodicity of tree growth in the tropics. Gard. Bull. Straits Settlem. 17: 11–81.
Kostermans, A. J. G. H. 1954. A monograph of the Asiatic, Malaysian, Australian and Pacific species of Mimosaceae, formerly included in Pithecollobium Mart. Bull. Org. Natuurw. Onderz. Indon’esië 20: 1–122.
Müller-Doblies, U. & F. Weberling. 1984. Über Prolepsis und verwandte Begriffe. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 59: 121–144.
Prévost, M.-F. 1979. Modular construction and its distribution in tropical woody plants. Pages 223–231. In: P. B. Tomlinson & M. H. Zimmerman, editors. Tropical trees as living systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rickett, H. W. 1944. The classification of inflorescences. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 10: 187–231.
—. 1955. Materials for a dictionary of botanical terms. III. Inflorescences. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 82: 419–445.
Stebbins, G. L. 1974. Flowering plants: evolution above the species level. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
Tomlinson, P. B. 1978. Branching and axis differentiation in tropical trees. Pages 187–207. In: P. B. Tomlinson & M. H. Zimmerman, editors. Tropical trees as living systems. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
—. 1980. The biology of trees native to tropical Florida. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
— & A. M. Gill. 1973. Growth habits of tropical trees: some guiding principles. Pages 129–143. In: B. J. Meggers, E. S. Ayensu & W. D. Duckworth, editors. Tropical forest ecosystems in Africa and South America: a comparative review. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
Tucker, S. C. 1987a. Floral initiation and development in legumes. Pages 183–239. In: C. H. Stirton, editor. Advances in legume systematics. Part 3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
—. 1987b. Pseudoracemes in papilionoid legumes: their nature, development and variation. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 95: 181–206.
—. 1988. Heteromorphic flower-development in Neptunia pubescens, a mimosoid legume. Amer. J. Bot. 75: 205–224.
Van Steenis, C. G. G. J. 1963. Definition of the concept ‘inflorescence’ with special reference to lignaceous plants. Fl. Males. Bull. 18: 1005–1007.
Weberling, F. 1989. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. English translation by R. J. Pankhurst.
White, J. 1979. The plant as a metapopulation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10: 109–145.
—. 1984. Plant metamerism. Pages 15–47. In: R. Dirzo & J. Sarukhan, editors. Perspectives on plant population ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
Wisniewski, M. & A. L. Bogle. 1982. The ontogeny of the inflorescence and flower of Liquidambar styraciflua L. (Hamamelidaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 69: 1612–1624.
Wyatt, R. 1982. Inflorescence architecture: how flower number, arrangement, and phenology affect pollination and fruit set. Amer. J. Bot. 69: 585–594.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grimes, J. Metamerism, heterochrony, and inflorescence morphology of the Pithecellobium-complex (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae: Ingeae). Brittonia 44, 140–159 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/2806829
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2806829