Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T17:32:50.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimation of the lifetime distribution of the parts from the autopsy statistics of the machine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Isaac Meilijson
Isaac Meilijson*
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
*
∗Postal address: Department of Statistics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Given a coherent reliability system, let Z be the age of the machine at breakdown, and I the set of parts dead by time Z. We prove that if all lifetime distributions are non-atomic and share the same essential extrema, and if the incidence matrix of the minimal cut sets has rank equal to the number of parts, then the joint distribution of Z and I determines uniquely the lifetime distribution of each part. We present a Newton–Kantorovič iterative method for the computation of those distributions. We deal informally with the relaxation of the assumptions and with the statistical problem where instead of the joint distribution of Z and I we have an empirical estimate of this joint distribution.

Keywords

COMPETING RISKSCOHERENT RELIABILITY SYSTEMSLIFETIME DISTRIBUTION
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 829 - 838
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This work was concluded during the author's visit to the Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

References

[1] El-Neweihi, E., Proschan, F. and Sethuraman, J. (1978) Multistate coherent systems. J. Appl. Prob. 15, 675–688.Google Scholar
[2] Gail, M. (1975) A review and critique of some models used in competing risk analysis. Biometrics 31, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[3] Moeschberger, M. L. (1974) Life tests under dependent competing causes of failure. Technometrics 16, 39–47.Google Scholar
[4] Nadas, A. (1970) On estimating the distribution of a random vector when only the smallest coordinate is available. Technometrics 12, 923–924.Google Scholar
[5] Nadas, A. (1971) The distribution of the identified minimum of a normal pair determines the distribution of the pair. Technometrics 13, 201–202.Google Scholar
[6] Prentice, R. L., Kalbfleisch, J. D., Peterson, A. V. Jr., Flournoy, N., Farewell, V. T. and Breslow, N. E. (1978) The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics 34, 541–554.Google Scholar
[7] Rall, L. B. (1969) Computational Solution of Nonlinear Operator Equations. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar