Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:33:12.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Northeastern Anatolia: on the periphery of empires

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Anna Parker
Anna Parker
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Northeastern Anatolia during the Iron Age has long been neglected archaeologically, yet historical sources attest to its importance, located on the frontiers of the Urartian and Persian empires and witness to numerous incursions by diverse groups such as the Medes, Cimmerians and Scythians. The archaeological potential of the area was first revealed by surface surveys carried out in the 1940s and 1950s. However, with the University of Melbourne's excavations and surface survey of sites in the Bayburt and Erzurum provinces, there is now a significant body of material emerging for study.

Historical and archaeological foci have traditionally been with the centres of empires, the core or optimal areas, while it is in the periphery, or marginal areas that the dynamics of social change are most evident. These foci largely stem from the inherent difficulties involved in gleaning information on peripheral areas.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 49 , December 1999 , pp. 133 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Badaljan, R S, Edens, C, Gorny, R, Kohl, P L, Stronach, D, Tonikjan, A, Hamayakjan, S, Mandrikjan, S, Zardarjan, M 1993: ‘Preliminary report on the 1992 excavations at Horom, Armenia’ Iran 8: 31–24Google Scholar
Burney, C 1970: ‘Excavations at Haftavan Tepe 1968: first preliminary report’ Iran 8: 157–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, S 1983: Porsuk I, la Céramique de l'Age du Bronze et de l Age du Fer. ParisGoogle Scholar
Emre, K 1969: ‘The Urartian pottery from Altıntepe’ Belleten 33: 291–301Google Scholar
Erzen, A 1988: Çavuştepe I (Publications of the Turkish Historical Society, Series V, no 37). AnkaraGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goff, C 1985: ‘Excavations at Bābā Jān: the architecture and pottery of Level I’ Iran 23: 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauptmann, H 1969–1970: ‘Norşun-Tepe’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 19/20: 21–78Google Scholar
Henrickson, R C 1993: ‘Politics, economics and ceramic continuity at Gordion in the late second and early first millennia BC’ in Kingery, W D (ed), Social and Cultural Contexts of New Ceramic Technologies (Ceramics and Civilisations 6). Ohio: 89–178Google Scholar
Hopkins, T K, Wallerstein, I 1982: ‘Structural transformations of the world-economy’ in Hopkins, T K and Wallerstein, I (eds), World-System Analysis Theory and Methodology. Beverley Hills: 121–142Google Scholar
Kleiss, W (ed) 1979: Bastam 1: Ausgrabungen in den Urartäischen Anlagen 1972–1975. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Kroll, S 1976: ‘Keramik Urartäischer Festungen in Iran’ Archaeologische Mitteilungen aus Iran (Ergänzungsband 2). BerlinGoogle Scholar
Kroll, S 1979a: ‘Die Urartäischer Keramik aus Bastam’ in Kleiss, W (ed), Bastam 1: Ausgrabungen in den Urartäischen Anlagen 1972–1975. Berlin: 203–220Google Scholar
Kroll, S 1979b: ‘Meder in Bastam’ in Kleiss, W (ed), Bastam 1: Ausgrabungen in den Urartäischen Anlagen 1972–1975. Berlin: 229–234Google Scholar
Kroll, S 1988: ‘Die Keramik’ in Kleiss, W (ed), Bastam 2: Ausgrabungen in den Urartäischen Anlagen 1977–1978. Berlin: 165–73Google Scholar
Moorey, P R S 1980: Cemeteries of the First Millennium BC at Deve Höyük, near Carchemish Salvaged by T E Lawrence and C L Woolley in 1913 (British Archaeological Reports International Series 87). OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ökse, T 1988: Mitteleisenzeitliche Keramik Zentral-Ostanatoliens (Berliner Beiträge zum Vorderen Orient 9). BerlinGoogle Scholar
Pecorella, P E, Salvini, M (eds) 1984: Tra lo Zagros e l'Urmia. RomeGoogle Scholar
Russell, H 1980: Pre-Classical Pottery of Eastern Anatolia (British Archaeological Reports International Series 85). OxfordGoogle Scholar
Sagona, A, Pemberton, E, McPhee, I 1991: ‘Excavations at Büyüktepe Höyük, 1990’ Anatolian Studies 41: 145–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagona, A, Pemberton, E, McPhee, I 1992: ‘Excavations at Büyüktepe Höyük, 1991’ Anatolian Studies 42: 29–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagona, A, Pemberton, E, McPhee, I 1993: ‘Excavations at Büyüktepe Höyük, 1992’ Anatolian Studies 43: 69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagona, A, Sagona, C, Özkorocuklu, H 1995: ‘Excavations at Sos Höyük 1994, first preliminary report” Anatolian Studies 45: 193–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagona, A, Erkmen, M, Sagona, C, Thomas, I 1996: ‘Excavations at Sos Höyük 1995, second preliminary report’ Anatolian Studies 46: 27–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sams, G K 1994: The Early Phrygian Pottery, The Gordion Excavations, 1950–1973: Final Reports 4 (University Museum Monographs 79). PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
Stronach, D 1978: Pasargadae: A Report on the Excavations, 1961–1963. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Summers, G D, Summers, M E F, Ahmet, K 1993: ‘The regional survey at Kerkenes Daǧ: an interim report on the seasons of 1993 and 1994’ Anatolian Studies 45: 43–68Google Scholar
Summers, G D 1993: ‘Archaeological evidence for the Achaemenid period in eastern Turkey’ Anatolian Studies 43: 85–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, G D 1994: ‘Grey Ware and the eastern limits of Phrygia’ in Çilingiroǧlu, A, French, D H (eds), Anatolian Iron Ages 3 (British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara Monograph 16). Ankara: 241–53Google Scholar
Tuplin, C 1987: ‘The administration of the Achaemenid empire’ in Carradice, I (ed), Coinage and Administration in the Athenian and Persian Empires (British Archaeological Reports International Series 343). Oxford: 109–66Google Scholar
von der Osten, H H 1937: The Alishar Hüyük Seasons of 1930–1932, Part III (University of Chicago Oriental Institute Publications 30, Researches in Anatolia 9). ChicagoGoogle Scholar
von der Osten, H H 1952: ‘Die Urartäische Töpferei aus Van und die Möglichkeiten ihrer Einordnung in die Anatolische Keramik I’ Orientalia 21: 307–28Google Scholar
Weiskopf, M N 1982: Achaemenid Systems of Governing in Anatolia (unpublished PhD thesis). University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Young, T C, Levine, L 1974: Godin II, Excavations of the Godin Project: Second Progress Report (Royal Ontario Museum, Occassional Paper 26). TorontoGoogle Scholar