Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T06:59:34.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Presence of the Sign in Goethe's Faust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Neil M. Flax
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent studies in the early history of semiotics allow us to trace an open concern with the problem of language in Goethe's Faust. The protagonist appears as a quest hero in search of a revelatory sign, whether verbal or pictorial, that will release him from the world of mediating representations. The folly of the quest is consistently satirized from the viewpoint of Romantic aesthetics and its theory of the symbol. For the Romantics, the aesthetic symbol is a sign that paradoxically effects a revelation by affirming its own semiotic nature. But in elevating semiotic phenomena to the status of epiphanies, Goethean symbolism in Faust confronts the same impasses that beset the hero as he seeks to escape the rule of signs. The recurring quandaries arise when the Romantic text responds to the initial challenge of semiotics by attempting to reconcile semiotics and theology.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 98 , Issue 2 , March 1983 , pp. 183 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Aarsleff, Hans. From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Atkins, Stuart. Goethe's Faust; A Literary Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Behling, Lottlisa. “Rembrandts sog. Dr. Faustus.” Oud Holland 79 (1964): 49–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruns, Gerald. Modern Poetry and the Idea of Language. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Butler, E. M. Ritual Magic. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Dehio, Georg. “Alt-italienische Gemälde als Quelle zum Faust.” Goethe-Jahrbuch 7 (1886): 251–65.Google Scholar
de Man, Paul. “The Rhetoric of Temporality.” In Interpretation: Theory and Practice. Ed. Singleton, Charles S. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1969, 173–209.Google Scholar
Diener, Gottfried. Fausts Weg zu Helena. Stuttgart: Klett, 1961.Google Scholar
Dörrie, Heinrich. Die schöne Galatea. München: Heimeran, 1968.Google Scholar
Durrani, Osman. Faust and the Bible. European Univ. Papers. Ser. 1, vol. 208. Bern: Peter Lang, 1977.Google Scholar
Emrich, Wilhelm. The Literary Revolution and Modern Society. Trans. Henderson, Alexander and Henderson, Elizabeth. New York: Ungar, 1971.Google Scholar
Emrich, Wilhelm. Die Symbolik von Faust II. 2nd ed. Bonn: Athenäum, 1957.Google Scholar
Fludd, Robert. Historia. Oppenheim, 1617–21.Google Scholar
Foerster, Richard. “Goethes Abhandlung über die Philostratischen Gemälde.” Goethe-Jahrbuch 24 (1903):167–84.Google Scholar
Foerster, Richard. “Philostrats Gemàlde in der Renaissance.” Jahrbuch der preussischen Kunstsammlungen 25 (1904):15–48.Google Scholar
Foerster, Richard. “Wiederherstellung antiker Gemälde durch Künstler der Renaissance.” Jahrbuch der preussischen Kunstsammlungen 43 (1922): 126–36.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things. New York: Pantheon, 1971.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Wahrheit und Méthode. Tübingen: Mohr, 1960.Google Scholar
Godwin, Joscelyn. Robert Fludd: Hermetic Philosopher and Surveyor of Two Worlds. Boulder, Colo.: Shambhala, 1979.Google Scholar
Goethe, Goethe Johann Wolfgang. Werke. Ed. Erich Trunz. Hamburger Ausgabe. 14 vols. Hamburg: Wegner, 1948–64.Google Scholar
Goethe, Goethe Johann Wolfgang. Werke. Weimarer Ausgabe. 133 vols. Weimar, 1877–1919.Google Scholar
Goethe, Goethe Johann Wolfgang. Faust. Trans. Bayard Taylor. 2 vols. Boston, 1898.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. “Icones Symbolicae: Philosophies of Symbolism and Their Bearing on Art.” In his Symbolic Images: Studies in the Art of the Renaissance. New York: Phaidon, 1972, 123–95.Google Scholar
Grillot de Givry, Emile A. A Pictorial Anthology of Witchcraft, Magic, and Alchemy. Trans. J. Courtenay Locke. 1931; rpt. Chicago: University Books, 1958.Google Scholar
Habicht, Curt. “Findlinge zum Thema Goethe und die bildende Kunst.” Monatshefte für Kunstwissenschaft 11 (1918):232–38, 278–90.Google Scholar
Hamlin, Cyrus. “Image and Intertext: Rembrandt and Goethe's Faust?' Unpublished essay.Google Scholar
Hamlin, Cyrus, ed. Faust. By Goethe. Trans. Walter Arndt. New York: Norton, 1976.Google Scholar
Jantz, Harold. Goethe's Faust as a Renaissance Man. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Phillipe, and Nancy, Jean-Luc. L'Absolu littéraire. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1978.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold E. Letter to Nicolai, 26 May 1769. In Sämtliche Schriften. Ed. Karl Lachmann. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: 1891, 17:289–92.Google Scholar
Marache, Maurice. Le Symbole dans la pensée et l'œuvre de Goethe. Paris: Nizet, 1960.Google Scholar
Mason, Eudo C. Goethe's Faust: Its Genesis and Purport. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Michel, Christoph. “Goethe und Philostrats ‘Bilder.‘ ” Jahrbuch des freien deutschen Hochstifts (1973): 117–56.Google Scholar
Morris, Max. “Gemälde und Bildwerke in Faust.” In his Goethe-Studien. Berlin: Skopnik, 1902, 1:114–52.Google Scholar
Müller, Curt. Die geschichtlichen Voraussetzungen des Symbolbegriffs in Goethes Kunstanschauung. Leipzig: Mayer und Müller, 1937.Google Scholar
Müller, Curt. “Der Symbolbegriff in Goethes Kunstanschauung.” Goethe. Viermonatsschrift der Goethe-Gesellschaft 8 (1943): 269–80.Google Scholar
Münz, Ludwig. Die Kunst Rembrandts und Goethes Sehen. Leipzig: Keller, 1934.Google Scholar
Neubert, Franz. Vom Doctor Faustus zu Goethes Faust. Leipzig: Weber, 1932.Google Scholar
Panofsky, Erwin. Idea: A Concept in Art Theory. Trans. Peake, Joseph J. S. Columbia: Univ. of South Carolina Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. Collected Papers. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Pigler, Andor. Barockthemen. Budapest: Verlag der Ungarischen Akademie, 1956.Google Scholar
Redslob, Edwin. “Anschauungserlebnisse der Jugendzeit in Goethes Dichtung.” Jahrbuch des freien deutschen Hochstifts (1963): 1–18.Google Scholar
Rüdiger, Horst. “Weltliteratur in Goethes ‘Helena.‘” Jahrbuch der deutschen Schillergesellschaft 8 (1964):172–98.Google Scholar
Scheible, Johann, ed. Das Kloster. Stuttgart: 1845–49.Google Scholar
S⊘rensen, Bengt Algot. Allégorie und Symbol. Frankfurt: Athenä 1972.Google Scholar
S⊘rensen, Bengt Algot. Symbol und Symbolismus. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1963.Google Scholar
Storck, Willy. Goethes Faust und die bildende Kunst. Leipzig: Xenien, 1912.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. Théories du symbole. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1977.Google Scholar
Tornius, Valerian. “Goethes Theaterleitung und die bildende Kunst.” Jahrbuch des freien deutschen Hochstifts (1912):191–211.Google Scholar
van de Waal, H. “Rembrandt's Faust Etching.” Oud Holland 79 (1964): 7–48.Google Scholar
Wegner, Wolfgang. Die Faustdarstellung vom 16. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart. Amsterdam: Erasmus, 1962.Google Scholar
Wellbery, David. “Aesthetics and Semiotics in the German Enlightenment.” Diss. Yale 1977.Google Scholar
Witkowski, Georg, ed. Goethes Faust. Leiden: Brill, 1911.Google Scholar