Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-5fx6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T09:40:48.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Ceramic Perspective on the Formative to Classic Transition in Southern Veracruz, Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Christopher A. Pool  and
Georgia Mudd Britt
Christopher A. Pool
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506
Georgia Mudd Britt
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For any particular historical circumstance, explanations of ceramic evolution should consider the performance characteristics of pottery vessels in their behavioral contexts, as well as the varying effects of evolutionary processes operating at different social, spatial, and temporal scales. The replacement of tempered black and differentially fired serving vessels by fine-paste wares during the Formative to Classic transition in the Sierra de los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico illustrates these points. New radiocarbon assays from the Bezuapan site document the rapidity of this transition. Evaluation of visual performance characteristics and contextual associations suggest that the Tuxtlas fine-paste tradition began as a Late Formative prestige technology. Adoption of updraft kilns in the Terminal Formative period lowered the risk of firing losses and allowed savings in paste preparation and resource procurement costs to be realized. As a result, the fine-paste tradition spread to wider segments of society, ultimately replacing earlier traditions. A volcanic eruption at the close of the Formative period and subsequent immigration of Central Mexican settlers constituted evolutionary sorting mechanisms, which perturbed general trends in ceramic evolution within a restricted area of the central Tuxtlas.

Resumen

Resumen

Para cualquier caso histórico particular, las explicaciones de la evolución de una tradición alfarera deben considerar las características de ejecución de las vasijas en sus contextos de manufactura y uso, así como los efectos variables de los procesos evolutivos que operan en diferentes escalas distintas de la sociedad, es decir la espacial y la temporal. Estos puntos pueden ejemplificarse con el proceso de sustitución de cerámica negra con cocción diferencial por cerámicas de pasta fina anaranjado y gris durante la transición entre el periodo Formativo y el Clásico en la Sierra de los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, México. Los nuevos fechamientos por radiocarbono del sitio de Bezuapan, documentan la rapidez de esta transición. Con base en las características visuales de las lozas y sus asociaciones contextuales, proponemos que la tradición de vasijas de servicio de pasta fina constituyó una tecnología de prestigio durante el Formativo Tardío. En el Formativo Terminal se adoptaron hornos de tiro verticales, lo que disminuyó las posibilidades de pérdidas en el proceso de cocción y a la vez permitió un uso más eficiente de los recursos y un ahorro en la energía invertida en la preparación de la pasta. Como resultado, el uso de las vasijas de pasta fina se amplió a otros segmentos de la sociedad, hasta que finalmente sustituyeron a las tradiciones más antiguas. A resultas de una erupción de fines del Formativo y la subsiguente llegada de migrantes del centro de México, ocurrieron una serie de mecanismos evolutivos de selección, que afectaron las tendencias generales del desarrollo de la alfarería en un área restringida de la porción central de los Tuxtlas.

Type
Articles
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 139 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Adams, W.Y. 1979 On the Argument from Ceramics to History: A Challenge Based on Evidence from Medieval Nubia. Current Anthropology 20:727–744.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. J. III 1991 Domestic Ceramic Production and Spatial Organization: A Mexican Case Study in Ethnoarchaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, M. 1982 Decoration as Ritual Symbol: A Theoretical Proposal and an Ethnographic Study in Southern Sudan. In Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, edited by I. Hodder, pp. 80–82. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, D. P. 1983 Pots as Tools. In Archaeological Hammers and Theories, edited by J. A. Moore and A. S. Keene, pp. 107–134. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Braun, D. P. 1987 Coevolution of Sedentism, Pottery Technology, and Horticulture in the Central Midwest, 200 B.C.-A.D. 600. In Emergent Horticultural Economies of the Eastern Woodlands, edited by W. F. Keegan, pp. 153–181. Occasional Paper No. 7. Centerfor Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Braun, D. P. 1991 Why Decorate a Pot? Midwestern Household Pottery 200 B.C.-A.D. 600. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10:360–397.Google Scholar
Braun, D. P. 1995 Style, Selection, and Historicity. In Style, Society and Person, edited by C. Carr and J. E. Neitzel, pp. 123–141. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britt, G. M. 2000 A Re-examination of Ceramic Standardization and Household Production at Bezuapan, Veracruz, Mexico. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
Coe, M. D. 1965 Archaeological Synthesis of Southern Veracruz and Tabasco. In Archaeology of Southern Mesoamerica, Pt. 2, edited by G. R. Willey, pp. 679–715. Handbook of Middle American Indians, vol. 3, R. Wauchope, general editor. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
DeBoer, W R., and Moore, J. A. 1982 The Measurement and Meaning of Stylistic Diversity. Nawpa Pacha 20:147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, R. A. 1997 Investigaciones arqueológicas en La Mojarra, Veracruz, México temporada 1995. Final Technical Report submitted to the Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico.Google Scholar
Diehl, R. A., Vargas González, A., and Vázquez Zárate, S. 1997 Proyecto Arqueológico La Mojarra. In Memoria del coloquio arqueologia del centro y sur de Veracruz, edited by S. Ladrón de Guevara González and S. Vázquez Zárate, pp. 197–209. Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa.Google Scholar
Douglas, M., and Isherwood, B. 1979 The World of Goods: Toward an Anthropology of Consumption. W W Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Eighmy, J. L. 1979 Logistic Trends in Southwest Population Growth. In Transformations: Mathematical Approaches to Culture Change, edited by C. Renfrew and K. L. Cooke, pp. 205–220. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Foster, G. M. 1976 Contemporary Pottery Techniques in Southern and Central Mexico. In Studies in Middle American Anthropology, pp. 1–50. Middle American Research Institute Publication 22. Tulane University, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Gosselain, O. P. 1992 Bonfire of the Enquiries. Pottery Firing Temperatures in Archaeology: What For? Journal of Archaeological Science 19:243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, R., Jacobsen, R. B., and Miller, J. L. L. 1973 A Mathematical Theory of Social Change. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Hayden, B. 1995 The Emergence of Prestige Technologies and Pottery. In The Emergence of Pottery: Technology and Innovation in Ancient Societies, edited by W K. Barnett and J. W Hoopes, pp. 257–265. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F. 1960 Agriculture and the Theocratic State in Lowland South-eastern Mexico. American Antiquity 26:215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirth, K. G. 1993 The Household as an Analytical Unit: Problems in Method and Theory. In Prehistoric Domestic Units in Western Mesoamerica: Studies of the Household, Compound, and Residence, edited by R. S. Santley and K. G. Hirth, pp. 21–36. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
Hoag, E. 1997 An Analysis of Burned Earth Materials from Tres Zapotes, Veracruz, Mexico. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1982 Symbols in Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lewis, O. 1963 Life in a Mexican Village: Tepoztlan Restudied. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Millon, R. 1988 The Last Years of Teotihuacan Dominance. In The Collapse of Ancient States and Civilizations, edited by N. Yoffee and G. Cowgill, pp. 102–164. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, H. 1992 Ceramics and Evolution. In Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 4, edited by M. J. Schiffer, pp. 141–193. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Neff, H. 1993 Theory, Sampling and Analytical Techniques in the Archaeological Study of Prehistoric Ceramics. American Antiquity 58:23–44.Google Scholar
Neff, H., Bove, F. J., Robinson, E. J., and Arroyo L., B. A. 1994 A Ceramic Compositional Perspective on the Formative to Classic Transition in Southern Mesoamerica. Latin American Antiquity 5:333–358.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. J., and Holland, T. D. 1990 Variation, Selection, and the Archaeological Record. In Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 2, edited by M. J. Schiffer, pp. 31–79. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. J., and Holland, T. D. 1995 Behavioral Archaeology and the Extended Phenotype. In Expanding Archaeology, edited by J. M. Skibo, W. H. Walker, and A. E. Nielsen, pp. 143–161. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. J., Lyman, R. Lee, and Leonard, R. D. 1998 Basic Incompatibilities between Evolutionary and Behavioral Archaeology. American Antiquity 63:485–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz Ceballos, P. 1975 La cerámica de Los Tuxtlas. Tésis profesional, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa.Google Scholar
Ortiz Ceballos, P. 1990 Los teotihuacanos en Matacapan. In La epoca Clásica: nuevos hallazgos, nuevos ideas, edited by A. Cardos de Mendez, pp. 307–328. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, México, D.F. Google Scholar
Ortiz Ceballos, P., and Santley, R. S. 1988 La cerámica de Matacapan. Manuscript on file, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Ortiz Ceballos, P., and Santley, R. S. 1998 Matacapan: un ejemplo de enclave teotihuacano en la costa del Golfo. In Los ritmos de cambio en Teotihuacán: reflexiones y discusiones de su cronología. Serie arqueología, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, México, D.F. Google Scholar
Plog, F. 1979 Alternative Models of Prehistoric Change. In Transformations: Mathematical Approaches to Culture Change, edited by C. Renfrew and K. L. Cooke, pp. 221–236. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Pool, C. A. 1990 Ceramic Production, Resource Procurement, and Exchange at Matacapan, Veracruz, Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, Tulane University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Pool, C. A. 1992 Strangers in a Strange Land: Ethnicity and Ideology at an Enclave Community in Middle Classic Mesoamerica. In Ancient Images, Ancient Thought: The Archeology of Ideology, edited by A. S. Goldsmith, pp. 41–55. University of Calgary, Alberta.Google Scholar
Pool, C. A. 1995 La cerámica del Clásico Tardío y el Postclásico en la Sierra de los Tuxtlas. Arqueología 13–14:37–48.Google Scholar
Pool, C. A. 1997a The Spatial Structure of Formative Houselots at Bezuapan, Veracruz, Mexico. In Olmec to Aztec: Settlement Patterns in the Ancient Gulf Lowlands, edited by B. L. Stark and P. J. Arnold III., pp. 40–67. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Pool, C. A. 1997b Prehispanic Kilns at Matacapan, Veracruz, Mexico. In Prehistory and History of Ceramic Kilns, edited by W. D. Kingery and P. M. Rice, pp. 149–171. American Ceramic Society, Westerville, Ohio.Google Scholar
Pool, C. A. 2000 Why a Kiln? Firing Technology in the Sierra de los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico. Archaeometry 42:1. In press.Google Scholar
Pool, C. A., Ortiz Ceballos, P., Salazar Buenrostro, Z. and Martinez Hernandez, J. 1987 Informe Final de Campo 1986: la producción e intercambio de la cerámica en Matacapan, Veracruz, Mexico. Report to the Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico, D.F. Google Scholar
Pool, C. A., and Santley, R. S. 1992 Middle Classic Pottery Economics in the Tuxtla Mountains, Southern Veracruz, Mexico. In Ceramic Production and Distribution: An Integrated Approach, edited by G. J. Bey III and C. A. Pool, pp. 205–234. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
Rattray, E. 1988 Nuevas Interpretaciones en Torno al Barrio de los Comerciantes. Anales de Antropologia 25:165–180.Google Scholar
Rattray, E. 1990 The Identification of Ethnic Affiliation at the Merchant’s Barrio, Teotihuacan. In Etnoarqueología: coloquio Bosch-Gempera, edited by Y. Sugiura and M. Serra, pp. 113–138. Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F. Google Scholar
Reinhardt, B. K. 1991 Volcanology of the Younger Volcanic Sequence and Volcanic Hazards Study of the Tuxtla Volcanic Field, Veracruz, Mexico. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Geology, Tulane University, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1979 Transformations. In Transformations: Mathematical Approaches to Culture Change, edited by C. Renfrew and K. L. Cooke, pp. 3–44. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Rice, P. M. 1987 Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rye, O. S. 1981 Pottery Technology: Principles and Reconstruction. Taraxacum, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Sabloff, J. A., and Smith, R. E. 1969 The Importance of Both Analytic and Taxonomic Classification in the Type-Variety System. American Antiquity 34:278–285.Google Scholar
Santley, R. S. 1991 Final Field Report: Tuxtlas Region Archaeological Survey, 1991 Field Season. Report submitted to the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Santley, R. S. 1994 The Economy of Ancient Matacapan. Ancient Mesoamerica 5:243–266.Google Scholar
Santley, R. S., and Arnold, P. J. III 1996 Prehispanic Settlement Patterns in the Tuxtla Mountains, Southern Veracruz, Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 23:225–249.Google Scholar
Santley, R. S., Arnold, P. J. III, and Barrett, T. P. 1997 The Formative Period in the Tuxtlas: Olmec Archaeology and Its Implications for Complex Society Development on the South Gulf Coast of Mexico. In Olmec to Aztec: Settlement Patterns in the Ancient Gulf Lowlands, edited by B. L. Stark and P. J. Arnold III., pp. 174–205. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Santley, R. S., Arnold, P. J. III, and Pool, C. A. 1989 The Ceramics Production System at Matacapan, Veracruz, Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 16:107–132.Google Scholar
Santley, R. S., Nelson, S. A., Reinhardt, B. K., Pool, C. A., and Arnold, P. J. III 1999 When Day Turned to Night: Volcanism and the Archaeological Record from the Tuxtla Mountains, Southern Veracruz, Mexico. In Catastrophes in Prehistory: A Global Perspective, edited by G. Bawden and R. Reycraft. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. In press.Google Scholar
Santley, R. S., and Ortiz Ceballos, P. 1985 Reporte Final de Campo Proyecto Matacapan: Temporada 1983. Cuadernos del Museo 4:3–91.Google Scholar
Santley, R. S., Ortiz Ceballos, P., Killion, T. W., Arnold, P. J., and Kerley, J. M. 1984 Final Field Report of the Matacapan Archaeological Project: The 1982 Season. Latin American Institute Research Paper Series No. 15. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Santley, R. S., Ortiz Ceballos, P., and Pool, C. A. 1987 Recent Archaeological Research at Matacapan, Veracruz: A Summary of the Results of the 1982 to 1986 Field Seasons. Mexicon 9(2):41–48.Google Scholar
Santley, R. S., Yarborough, C. M. and Hall, B. A. 1987 Enclaves, Ethnicity, and the Archaeological Record at Matacapan. In Ethnicity and Culture, edited by R. Auger, M. F. Glass, S. MacEachern, and P. H. McCartney, pp. 85–100. Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M.B. 1996 Some Relationships Between Behavioral and Evolutionary Archaeologies. American Antiquity 61:643–662.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M. B., and Skibo, J. M. 1997 The Explanation of Artifact Variability. American Antiquity 62:27–50.Google Scholar
Sinopoli, C. M. 1991 Approaches to Archaeological Ceramics. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Smith, M. 1985 Household Possessions and Wealth in Agrarian States: Implications for Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6:297–335.Google Scholar
Smith, M. 1992 Braudel’s Temporal Rhythms and Chronology Theory in Archaeology. In Archaeology, Annals, and Ethnohistory, edited by A. B. Knapp, pp. 23–34. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Spence, M. W. 1996 A Comparative Analysis of Ethnic Enclaves. In Arqueología mesoamericana: homenaje a William T. Sanders, edited by A. G. Mastache, J. R. Parsons, R. S. Santley and M. C. Serra Puche, pp.333–353. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia and Arqueología Mexicana, Mexico, D.F.Google Scholar
Stark, B. L. 1985 Archaeological Identification of Pottery Production Locations: Ethnoarchaeological and Archaeological Data in Mesoamerica. In Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, edited by B. A. Nelson, pp. 158–194. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Stark, B. L. 1989 Patarata Pottery: Classic Period Ceramics of the South-central Gulf Coast, Veracruz, Mexico. Anthropological Paper No. 51. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Stark, B. L. 1992 Ceramic Production in Prehistoric La Mixtequilla, South-Central Veracruz, Mexico. In Ceramic Production and Distribution: An Integrated Approach, edited by G. J. Bey III and C. A. Pool, pp. 175–204. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
Stark, B. L. 1997 Gulf Lowland Ceramic Styles and Political Geography in Ancient Veracruz. In Olmec to Aztec: Settlement Patterns in the Ancient Gulf Lowlands, edited by B. L. Stark and P. J. Arnold III., pp. 278–309. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Stark, B. L., and Arnold, P. J. III 1997 Introduction to the Archaeology of the Gulf Lowlands. In Olmec to Aztec: Settlement Patterns in the Ancient Gulf Lowlands, edited by B. L. Stark and P. J. Arnold III, pp. 3–32. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J. 1945 Las exploraciones efectuadas en los Tuxtlas, Veracruz. Anales del Museo Nacional de Antropologia, Historia, y Etnografía 3:82–109.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L., Hill, M., Wanda, J. P., and Birkenbeuel, G. K. 1992 SYSTAT for Windows: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar