JOURNAL TOOLS |
Publishing options |
eTOC |
To subscribe |
Submit an article |
Recommend to your librarian |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Publication history |
Reprints |
Permissions |
Cite this article as |
Share |
YOUR ACCOUNT
YOUR ORDERS
SHOPPING BASKET
Items: 0
Total amount: € 0,00
HOW TO ORDER
YOUR SUBSCRIPTIONS
YOUR ARTICLES
YOUR EBOOKS
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITY
REVIEW
Minerva Endocrinologica 2019 June;44(2):221-31
DOI: 10.23736/S0391-1977.17.02584-6
Copyright © 2017 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
language: English
Effect of vitamin D replacement in primary hyperparathyroidism with concurrent vitamin D deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Huai H. LOH 1 ✉, Lee L. LIM 2, Anne YEE 3, Huai S. LOH 4, Shireene R. VETHAKKAN 2
1 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Malaysia Sarawak, Jalan Datuk Mohd Musa, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia; 2 Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; 3 Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; 4 Clinical Academic Unit, Newcastle University Medicine Malaysia, Nusajaya, Johor, Malaysia
INTRODUCTION: We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effects of vitamin D replacement on biochemical and skeletal parameters in subjects with mild primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and coexistent vitamin D deficiency.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search of all English-language medical literature published from 1980 till May 2016 using PubMed, Embase and Ovid was performed. Nine observational studies were evaluated after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 547 patients were examined. All studies used vitamin D2/D3 or calcifediol (25-hydroxyvitamin D3), There was significant improvement of serum 25(OH)D with unchanged serum iPTH level after vitamin D replacement, with pooled d+: 3.10 (95% CI 2.25 to 3.95), P<0.01 and pooled d+: 0.82 (95% CI -0.35 to 1.98), P=0.16 respectively. There was neither worsening of the pre-existing hypercalcemia (pooled d+: -0.27 [95% CI -1.09 to 0.64, P=0.56]) nor hypercalciuria (pooled d+: 3.64 [95% CI -0.55 to 7.83, P=0.09]). Two studies assessed in this meta-analysis reported unchanged bone density with vitamin D replacement.
CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D replacement in subjects with mild PHPT and coexistent vitamin D deficiency improved serum 25(OH)D level without worsening of pre-existing hypercalcemia or hypercalciuria. Well-designed multicenter randomized controlled trials examining pre- and postoperative outcomes of vitamin D therapy in patients with different severities of PHPT and vitamin D inadequacy are warranted to elucidate the most appropriate vitamin D treatment protocol and determine the long-term safety concerns.
KEY WORDS: Hyperparathyroidism - Vitamin D deficiency - Hypercalcemia - Bone density