RELEVANSI KEBIJAKAN TPPA 2011 TERHADAP NEGARA-NEGARA ANGGOTA WTO DALAM PERDAGANGAN INTERNASIONAL

Meliyani Sidiqah (1)
(1) Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung (STHB), Bandung , Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v23i2.5786

Article Sidebar

Issue
Vol. 23 No. 2 (2022)
Submitted
29 June 2022
Published
31 October 2022
PDF

Abstract

Tobacco Plain Packaging Act (TPPA) 2011 is one of the laws enacted by Australia which is opposed by tobacco producing countries because it requires plain packaging of cigarettes and other tobacco products. The purpose of this research are to find out the relevance of the TPPA 2011 promulgated by Australia to the trade provisions in the WTO, and to find out the legal consequences for WTO members that have bilateral relation with Australia. The specifications of this research is descriptive. The type of research is normative juridicial research. The approach method is statute approach, and case aprroach. The data collection technique is through the study of primary, secondary and tertiary legal material which are analyzed using qualitative methods. The first result is, TPPA 2011 is not relevant to the trade provisions in the WTO. The second result is the WTO members that have bilateral relation with Australia must be willing to comply with the TPPA 2011.
Keywords: Australia; cigarette plain packaging;TPPA 2011.

Full Article

Generated from XML file

References

Adolf, H. (1998). Hukum Ekonomi Internasional: Suatu Pengantar. RajaGrafindo Persada.

A.K., Syahmin, dan Fidelia. (2017). Analisis tentang Tobacco Plainpackaging Act in Australia dan Implikasinya terhadap Perdagangan Internasional Indonesia. Simbur Cahaya, XXIV (3).

Bungin, B. (2012). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif: Pemahaman Filosofis dan Metodologis ke Arah Penguasaan Model Aplikasi. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Febrianto, V. (2022). Indonesia Gugat Australia Terkait Kemasan Rokok Polos. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/500173/indonesia-gugat-australia-terkait-kemasan-rokok-polos

Garner, Bryan A. (2014). Black’s Law Dictionary. 11th Edition. Thomson Reuters.

Gerhart, Peter M., and Michael S. Baron. (2004). Understanding National Treatment: The Participatory Vision of the WTO. IND.INT’L & COMP. L. REV., 14 (3).

Goverment, D. of H. A. (2022). Tobacco Plain Packaging. Australia Government. www.health.gov.au/tobaccopp

H.S., S. & N. & E. S. (2013). Penerapan Teori Hukum Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Hammond, D. (2010). Plain Packaging” Regulation for Tobacco Product: The Impact of Standardizing the Color and Design of Cigarette Packs. Salud Pública de Mexico, 52(2).

Hutagalung, Jantarda Mauli, dan Clara Ignatia Tobing. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kebijakan Produk Kemasan Polos Produk Rokok Australia dalam WTO. Law Review, XX (1).

Jarman, H. (2022). Attack on Australia: Tobacco Industry Challenges to Plain Packaging. Journal of Public Health Policy, 34(3).

Kelly, Lucas G. (2018). “Smoke ‘em If You Got ‘em: Discussing the WTO Dispute Settlement Panel’s Decision to Uphold Plain Packaging in Australia and its Impact on the Future”. UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 35 (2).

Lease, K. (2016). Smoke ‘Em if You Got ‘Em: Intellectual Property Rights in the Tobacco Industry Going Up in Smoke. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, (48) 1.

Mahadewi, Gusti Ayu Kadek Emi, Putu Titah Kawitri Resen, dan A.A Bagus Surya Widya Nugraha. (2022). Kepentingan Australia dalam Pembuatan Kebijakan Kemasan Polos Produk Rokok (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Tahun 2012. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi26NOKuZH6AhV83nMBHVMGAJIQFnoECAoQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fojs.unud.ac.id%2Findex.php%2Fhi%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F82822%2F42947&usg=AOvVaw26giup9d2BhrRRgLix4YRL

Munawaroh, S. (2006). Peranan Trips (Trade Related Aspects of Intelectual Property Rights) terhadap Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual di Bidang Teknologi Informasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi DINAMIK, XI (1).

ND, Mukti Fajar & Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Hukum Empiris. Pustaka Pelajar.

News. (2022). Australia’s Plain Packaging Law Successful, Studies Show. ABC Australia. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-19/australias-plain-packaging-laws-are-a-success,-studies-show/6331736

Rosen, E. (2022). RUU Antirokok Australia ‘bisa dicontoh dunia. BBC Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/laporan_khusus/2011/07/110629_ozvsphilipmorris

Satriyanti, Batara. (2019). “Kebijakan The Tobaco Plain Packaging di Australia”. eJournal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, 7 (3).

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Radja Grafindo Persada.

Tempo. (2022). Australia Tolak Gugatan Perusahaan Rokok. Tempo Indonesia. https://koran.tempo.co/read/ekonomi-dan-bisnis/283519/australia-tolak-gugatan-perusahaan-rokok

The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, (1994).

Tobacco Plain Packaging Act, (2014).

Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, (1967) (testimony of UN).

Utami, E. (2022). RI Gugat Australia soal Kemasan Polos Rokok. Suara.Com. https://www.suara.com/bisnis/2015/06/05/184746/ri-gugat-australia-soal-kemasan-polos-rokok

Virgianty, K. (2022). Australia: Diwajibkan Bungkus Rokok Polos, Produsen Melawan. Satu Harapan. http://www.satuharapan.com/read-detail/read/australia-diwajibkan-bungkus-rokok-polos-produsen-melawan

WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, (2004) (testimony of WHO).

WHO. (2022). No Title. WHO. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241565226

WIPO. (2022). Paris Convention for the Protection of Industial Property. https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/paris/

Yuliati, S. (2014). Politik Australia dalam Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) pada Pemerintahan Julia Gillard (2010-2013). Jom FISIP, 1 (2).

Authors

Meliyani Sidiqah
Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung (STHB), Bandung
ms.meliyanisidiqah@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Author Biography

Meliyani Sidiqah, Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung (STHB), Bandung

Dosen Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung (STHB), Bandung

Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Article Details