Adopting MOOCs on Campus: A Collaborative Effort to Test MOOCs on Campuses of the University System of Maryland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i2.523Keywords:
MOOC, side-by-side comparison, blended learning, hybridAbstract
To address the paucity of data on the use of MOOCs in “traditional” postsecondary institutions, Ithaka S+R and the University System of Maryland studied the feasibility of repurposing MOOCs for use in hybrid, credit-bearing courses. In this paper we will describe the design of a large-scale study undertaken to examine the use of MOOCs in fourteen campus-based courses, followed by two types of findings: First, we will share quantitative outcomes from students in hybrid sections, comparing students who took MOOCs with those who were taught in a traditional face-to-face manner; second, we will share qualitative findings on the opportunities and challenges presented by the use of MOOCs on campus. Finally, we will reflect on what would need to occur in order for these models to see widespread adoption in the future.References
Bacow, L. S., Bowen, W.G. Guthrie, K.M., Lack, K.A., & Long, M.P. (May 2012). Barriers to Adoption of Online Learning Systems in U.S. Higher Education. Ithaka S+R. Available http://www.sr.ithaka.org/research-publications/barriers-adoption-online-learning-systems-us-higher-education
Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M.M., Lack, K.A., & Nygren, T.I. (2014). Learning Online at Public Universities: Evidence from a Six-Campus Randomized Trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 94-111.
Bruff, D. O., Fisher, D. H., McEwen, K. E., & Smith, B. E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student perceptions of an experiment in blended learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 187-199
Figlio, D., Rush, M., & Yin, L. (2013) Is it Live or is it Internet? Experimental Estimates of the Effects of Online Instruction on Student Learning. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(4), 763-784.
Firmin, R., Schiorring, E., Whitmer, J., Willett, T., & Sujitparapitaya, S. (2013). Preliminary Summary SJSU Augmented Online Learning Environment Pilot Project. The Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges. Available http://www.sjsu.edu/chemistry/People/Faculty/Collins_Research_Page/AOLE%20Report%20-September%2010%202013%20final.pdf
Griffiths, R., Chingos, M., Mulhern, C., & Spies, R. (July 10, 2014). Interactive Online Learning on Campus: Testing MOOCs and Other Platforms in Hybrid Formats in the University System of Maryland. Ithaka S+R. Available at http://www.sr.ithaka.org/research-publications/interactive-online-learning-on-campus.
Ho, A. D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., & Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses (HarvardX and MITx Working Paper No. 1). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2381263 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2381263
Joyce, T.J., Crockett, S., Jaeger, D.A., Altindag, O., & O’Connell, S.D. (March 2014). Does Classroom Time Matter? A Randomized Field Experiment of Hybrid and Traditional Lecture Formats in Economics. NBER working paper No. 20006.
Veeramachaneni, K., Dernoncourt, F., Taylor, C., Pardos, Z., & O’Reilly, U. M. (2013, June). MOOCDB: Developing data standards for MOOC data science. InAIED 2013 Workshops Proceedings Volume (p. 17).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
