MICHAEL PSELLUS ON PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/subbto.2021.1.03Keywords:
Chaldaean Oracles, Opuscula, philosophy, theology, revelationAbstract
This paper explores the use of the terms theologia and philosophia in the philosophic opuscula of Michael Psellus, especially those which are dedicated to the Chaldaean Oracles. It begins with a review of previous pagan and Christian usage, the conclusion of which is that Christians rejected the pagan distinction between theologoi, as inspired conduits of divine truth, from philosophers who interpreted such revelations under the rubric of theologia. For Christians Greek theologoi were mere purveyors of myth; theologia was not a branch of philosophy but the exposition of truths revealed in scripture. Since the revealers were already theologians, and the interpreters were theologoi in their own right, the terms became synonymous when applied to Christian practice. Psellus is on the whole faithful to this tradition, reserving the term theologia for Christian teaching in contrast to philosophy, except in one passage that speaks of the "philosophy and theology" of the Chaldaeans. The purpose of this phrase, in which the latter term seems to be epexegetic to the former, is to intimate that even the best theology of the pagans, being ignorant of the biblical revelation, can rise no higher than philosophy.References
Scholarly Literature
Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. and K. Parry (eds), Eastern Christianity and Late Antique Philosophy (Leiden: Brill 2020).
Betegh, G. “On Eudemus Fr. 150 (Wehrli)”, in M. I. Bodnár and W. Fortenbaugh (eds), Eudemus of Rhodes (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers (2002), 337-357
Daniélou, J. Message évangélique et culture hellénistique (Paris: Desclée et Cie 1961).
Des Places, E. “Le renouveau platonicien du XIe siècle: Michel Psellus et les Oracles Chaldaïques”, Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres110.2 (1966), 313-324.
Dillon, J. M. “Logos and Trinity: Patters of Platonist Influence on Early Christianity”, in G. Vesey (ed.), The Philosophy of Early Christianity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1989), 1-13.
Drecoll, V. H. “Is Porphyry the Source used by Marius Victorinus?”, in Turner and Corrigan, vol. 1, 65-80.
Edwards, M. J. “Precursors of Origen’s Hermeneutic Theory”, Studia Patristica 29 (1993), 232-237.
Edwards, M. J. Origen against Plato (Aldershot: Ashgate 2002).
Edwards, M.J. “Why did Constantine Label Arius a Porphyrian?”, L’Antiquité Classique 82 (2013), 239-247.
Fowden, G. “Pagan Versions of the Rain-Miracle of A.D. 172”, Historia 36 (1987), 83-95.
Goldschmidt, V. Questions Platoniciennes (Paris: Vrin 1970).
Hadot, P. “La division des parties de la philosophie dans l’Antiquité”, Museum Helveticum 36 (1979), 201-223.
Hadot, P. What is Ancient Philosophy?, trans. M. Chase (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 2004).
Hadot, P. Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell 1995).
Henry, P. “The Adversus Arium of Marius Victorinus, The First Systematic Exposition of the Doctrine of the Trinity”, Journal of Theological Studies 1 (1950), 42-55.
Jaeger, W. The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1947)
Krausmüller, D. “Philosophy and Theology in the Late Patristic Discourse: Pure Existence, Qualified Existence and the Arbor Porphyriana”, in Anagnostou-Laoutides and Parry, 150-173.
Lewy, H Sobria Ebrietas (Giessen: Töpelmann 1929).
Majercik, R. “The Existence-Life-Intellect Triad in Gnosticism and Neoplatonism”, Classical Quarterly 42 (1992), 475-488.
Majercik, R. “A Reminiscence of the ‘Chaldaean Oracles’ at Gregory of Nazianzus, Or. 2: ΟΙΟΝ ΚΡΑΤΗΡ ΤΙΣ ΥΠΕΠΕΡΡΥΗ”, Vigiliae Christianae 52 (1998), 286-292.
Markschies, C. Christian Theology and its Institutions in the Early Roman Empire (Waco: Baylor University Press 2015).
Naddaf, G. “Plato’s Theologia Revisited”, Methexis 9 (1996), 5-18.
O’Meara, J. J. Porphyry’s Philosophy from Oracles in Augustine (Paris: Études Augustiniennes 1959).
Rasimus, T. “Porphyry and the Gnostics: Reassessing Pierre Hadot’s Thesis in Light of the Second- and Third-Century Sethian Treatises”, in Turner and Corrigan, vol. 1, 81-110.
Spanu, N. Proclus on the Chaldaean Oracles (London: Routledge 2020).
Turner, J. D. and K. Corrigan (eds.), Plato’s Parmenides and its Heritage: Its Reception in Neoplatonic, Jewish and Christian Texts (2 vols, Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2010).
Vlastos, G. “Philosophy and Theology in Early Greek Thought”, Philosophical Quarterly 2 (1952), 97-123
Van Liefferinge, C. La théurgie des Oracles Chaldaïques à Proclus (Liège: Kernos supplement, Centre international d’étude de la religion grecque antique 1999).
Waszink J. H. (ed.), Tertullian’s De Anima (Amsterdam: Meulenhoff 1947).
Zachhuber, J. “Philosophy and Theology in Late Antiquity: Some reflections on Concepts and Terminologies”, in Anagnostou-Laoutdes and Parry, 50-77.
Zachhuber, J. The Rise of Christian Theology and the End of Ancient Metaphysics: Patristic Philosophy from the Cappadocian Fathers to John of Damascus (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2020).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Theologia Orthodoxa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN (print): 1224-0869, ISSN (online): 2065-9474, ISSN-L: 2065-9474