Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access September 5, 2010

Effect of the polymeric coating over Fe3O4 particles used for magnetic separation

  • Raúl Reza EMAIL logo , Carlos Martínez Pérez , Claudia Rodríguez González , Humberto Romero and Perla García Casillas
From the journal Open Chemistry

Abstract

In this work, the synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles by two variant chemical coprecipitation methods that involve reflux and aging conditions was investigated. The influence of the synthesis conditions on particle size, morphology, magnetic properties and protein adsorption were studied. The synthesized magnetite nanoparticles showed a spherical shape with an average particle size directly influenced by the synthesis technique. Particles of average size 27 nm and 200 nm were obtained. When the coprecipitation method was used without reflux and aging, the smallest particles were obtained. Magnetite nanoparticles obtained from both methods exhibited a superparamagnetic behavior and their saturation magnetization was particle size dependent. Values of 67 and 78 emu g−1 were obtained for the 27 nm and 200 nm magnetite particles, respectively. The nanoparticles were coated with silica, aminosilane, and silica-aminosilane shell. The influence of the coating on protein absorption was studied using Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) protein.

[1] A. Lu, E.L. Salabas, F. Schuth, Angew Chem. 46, 8 (2007) 10.1002/anie.200602866Search in Google Scholar

[2] G. Schmid, Nanoparticles: From Theory to Application, 1st edition (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2004) Search in Google Scholar

[3] G. Cao, Nanostructures & Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties & Applications, (Imperial College Press, London, 2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/978186094596010.1142/p305Search in Google Scholar

[4] R.M. Cornell, U. Schwertmann, The iron oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences and Uses, Second edition (Willey-VCH GmbH & Co. Egaa, New York, 2003) 10.1002/3527602097Search in Google Scholar

[5] C. Yu, K. Tam, C. Lo, S. Tsang, IEEE Trans. Magn. 43, 6 (2007) http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2006.88632110.1109/TMAG.2006.886321Search in Google Scholar

[6] M. Yamaura, R. Camilo, L. Sampaio, M. Macedo, M. Nakamura, H. Toma, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 279, 2 (2004) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.01.09410.1016/j.jmmm.2004.01.094Search in Google Scholar

[7] J. Xing, B. Zhang, Y. Lang, Y.H. Liu, H. Sci. China Ser. B 51, 2 (2008) Search in Google Scholar

[8] X. Liu, Z. Ma, J. Xing, H. Liu, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 270, 12 (2004) 10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.07.006Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Ma, Y. Zhang, W. Yu, H. Shen, H. Zhang, N. Gu. Colloid Surf. A: Phys. Eng. Aspects 212, 2 (2003) 10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00305-9Search in Google Scholar

[10] B. Kobayashi, S. Saeki, M. Yoshida, D. Nagao, M. Konno, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, DOI: 10.1007/s10971-007-1648-1 10.1007/s10971-007-1648-1Search in Google Scholar

[11] I. Safarik, M. Safarikova, BioMagnetic Res. Tech. DOI: 10.1186/1477-04X-2-7. Search in Google Scholar

[12] G. Gnanaprakash, S. Mahadevan, T. Jayakumar, P. Kalyanasundaram, J. Philip, R. Baldev, Mater. Chem. Phys. 103, 168 (2007) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.02.01110.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.02.011Search in Google Scholar

[13] Q. Chen, J. Wang, Y. Xiong, M. Wu, Z. Peng, Chem. Lett. 34, 5 (2005) Search in Google Scholar

[14] J. Wang, A. Peng, Y. Huang, Q. Chen, J. Cryst. Growth, 263, 616 (2004) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.11.10210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.11.102Search in Google Scholar

[15] P. Yang, J. Yu, T. Wu, G. Liu, T. Chang, D. Lee, D. Cho, Chinese Chem. Lett. 15, 1 (2004) Search in Google Scholar

[16] B. Zhang, J. Xing, H Liu, Chem. Eng. China. 1, 1 (2007) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11705-007-0001-010.1007/s11705-007-0001-0Search in Google Scholar

[17] H. Günzler, H. GremLich, IR Spectroscopy, 2nd edtion (Wiley-VCH, Germany, 2002) Search in Google Scholar

[18] Y. Ivanova, Ts. Gerganova, H.M.H.V. Fernandes, I.M. Miranda, E. Kashchieva, J. Univ. Chem. Metal. 41, 3 (2006) Search in Google Scholar

[19] I.J. Bruce, J. Taylor, M. Todd, M.J. Davies, E. Borioni, C. Sangregorio, T. Sen, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 284, 145 (2004) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.06.03210.1016/j.jmmm.2004.06.032Search in Google Scholar

[20] G. Zhang, Y. Liu, C. Zhang, W. Hu, W. Xu, Z. Li, S. Liang, J. Cao, Y. Wang, J. Nanopart. Res. 11, 2 (2008) 10.1007/s11051-008-9432-xSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2010-9-5
Published in Print: 2010-10-1

© 2010 Versita Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 14.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/s11532-010-0073-4/html
Scroll to top button