Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic risk ranking for large dams in South Africa

  • Published:
Acta Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Earthquake motion is one of the extreme loads acting on large dams. Dam owners and regulators must therefore ensure that dams are safely operated and present minimal risk to the public in case of extreme loads such as floods and earthquakes. Owners of many dams or officials in charge of dam safety programs may consider comparative assessment of the seismic risk associated with their dams and establish priorities for detailed evaluation. South Africa has in excess of 100 large state-owned dams and the characteristics of these dams have been used to perform a basic seismic hazard assessment and rank the vulnerability of these dams from the lowest to highest. One of the most decisive factors that contributes to the risk of a dam is the wall type; with gravity and earthfill dams being the most vulnerable to earthquake motion. Another aspect that needs further investigation is the downstream hazard potential which, if known to a better degree of accuracy, can provide more reasonable estimates of the risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, G.M., and D.M. Boore (2006), Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, 6, 2181–2205, DOI: 10.1785/0120050245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau, G.J. (2003), Dams and appurtenant facilities. In: W.-F. Chen, and C. Scawthorn (eds.), Earthquake Engineering Handbook, CRS Press, Boca Raton, pp. 26.1–26.47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau, G.J., and G.D. Ballentine (2002), A comprehensive seismic vulnerability and loss assessment of the State of Carolina using HAZUS. Part IV: Dam inventory and vulnerability assessment methodology, 7th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, July 21–25, Boston, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA (CD ROM).

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (1992), Selecting Seismic Parameters for Large Dams, International Commission for Large Dams, Bulletin 72.

  • Johnston, A.C. (1996), Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions—I. Instrumental seismicity, Geophys. J. Int. 124, 2, 381–414, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb07028.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kijko, A. (2004), Estimation of the maximum earthquake magnitude m max, Pure Appl. Geophys. 161, 8, 1–27, DOI: 10.1007/s00024-004-2531-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kijko, A., and M.A. Sellevoll (1989), Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part I: Utilization of extreme and complete catalogues with different threshold magnitudes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 79, 645–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kijko, A., and M.A. Sellevoll (1992), Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part II: Incorporation of magnitude heterogeneity, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 82, 120–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldovan, I.A., and A.P. Constantin (2006), Central-Romanian dams rating in seismic risk classes using probabilistic hazard assessment approach, Geophys. Res. Abstracts 8, 00402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M., and E. Hattingh (2009), Short communication: Collection of isoseismal maps for South Africa, Nat. Hazards 50, 2, 403–408, DOI: 10.1007/s11069-008-9332-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M., A. Kijko, and R. Durrheim (2009), Seismotectonic models for South Africa. Synthesis of geoscientific information, problems and way forward, Seismol. Res. Lett. 80, 1, 65–73, DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.80.1.71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toro, G.R., N.A. Abrahamson, and J.F. Schneider (1997), Model of strong ground motions from earthquakes in Central and Eastern North America: Best estimates and uncertainties, Seismol. Res. Lett. 68, 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosun, H., İ. Zorluer, A. Orhan, E. Seyrek, H. Savaş, and M. Türköz (2007), Seismic hazard and total risk analyses for large dams in Euphrates basin, Turkey, Eng. Geol. 89, 155–170, DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • URS Corporation et al. (2002), “Comprehensive Seismic Risk and Vulnerability Study for the State of South Carolina”. Report of the South Carolina Emergency Preparedness Division (SCEPD) and HAZUS, CD-ROM.

  • Wieland, M. (2004), Seismic design of dams, applying lessons learned, HRW 12, 3, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mayshree Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, M., Kijko, A. & van den Berg, L. Seismic risk ranking for large dams in South Africa. Acta Geophys. 59, 72–90 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-010-0044-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-010-0044-3

Key words

Navigation