Abstract
The revelation of vast global quantities of potentially productive gas and oil-prone shales has led to advancements in understanding important geological properties which impact reservoir performance. Based upon research on a variety of shales, several geological properties have been recognized as being common and important to hydrocarbon production. (1) transport/depositional processes include hemipelagic ‘rain’, hyperpycnal flows, turbidity current flows, tempestites, wave-reworking, and contour currents in both shallow and deep water settings. (2) Common shale minerals include clays, quartz, calcite, dolomite, apatite, and pyrite; organic constituents include spores (Tasmanites), plant remains, biogenic quartz and calcite, and arenaceous foraminifera. (3) Porosity and permeability are characteristically low with pore sizes ranging down to the nanoscale. Main pore types include intergranular (including pores within clay floccules), porous organic matter, porous fecal pellets, and microfractures. (4) Important geochemical characteristics include organic richness (>3%), maturity (>1.1%Ro for shale gas and 0.6–0.9% for shale oil) and type (I–IV), in addition to certain biomarkers which are indicators of bottom water oxicity during deposition. Remaining hydrocarbon potential [RHP = (S1 + S2)/TOC] also reflects temporal environmental changes. ‘Isotopic reversals’ can be used to detect best producing areas in shale-gas plays. (5) Lithofacies stacking patterns and sequence stratigraphy are the result of eustatic depositional history. A general sequence stratigraphic model is presented here that highlights this commonality. (6) Geomechanical properties are key to drilling, fracturing and production of hydrocarbons. Brittle-ductile couplets at several scales occur in shale sequences. (7) Geophysical properties, when calibrated to rock properties, provide a means of regionally to locally mapping the aforementioned properties. (8) Economic and societal considerations in the exploration and development of resource shales are garnering attention. Many potentially economic shale-gas and shale-oil plays are being identified globally. Risks and uncertainties associated with gas- and oil-rich shales include the lack of long-term production histories, environmental concerns related to hydraulic fracturing, uncertainty in calculating hydrocarbons-in-place, and fluctuations in supply, demand, and price.
[1] Jarvie D.M., Hill R.J., Ruble T.E., Pollastro R.M., Unconventional shale-gas systems: the Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment. Am. Assoc. Petr. Geol. B., 2007, 91, 475–499 10.1306/12190606068Search in Google Scholar
[2] Stow D.A.V., Bowen A.J., Origin of lamination in deep sea, fine-grained sediments. Nature, 1978, 274, 324–328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/274324a010.1038/274324a0Search in Google Scholar
[3] Slatt R. M., Thompson P.R., Submarine slope mudstone facies, Cozy Dell Formation (Middle Eocene), California. Geomarine Letters, 1985, 5, 39–45 10.1007/BF02629796Search in Google Scholar
[4] O’Brien N., Slatt R.M., Argillaceous Rock Atlas, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3422-710.1007/978-1-4612-3422-7Search in Google Scholar
[5] Bhattacharya J.P., MacEachern J.A., Hyperpycnal rivers and prodeltaic shelves in the Cretaceous seaway of North America. J. Sediment. Res., 2009, 79, 184–209 http://dx.doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2009.02610.2110/jsr.2009.026Search in Google Scholar
[6] Macquaker J., Bentley S., Bohacs K., Lazar R., Jonk R., Advective sediment transport on mud-dominated continental shelves: processes and products: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Search and Discovery Article #50281, AAPG Annual Convention, New Orleans, April 11–14, 2010, http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/2010/50281macquaker/ndx_macquaker.pdf Search in Google Scholar
[7] Abouelresh M., Slatt R.M., High-Frequency Sequence Stratigraphic Analysis of the Barnett Shale, Johnson County, Fort Worth Basin, Texas, USA. Am. Assoc. Petr. Geol. B., (in press) Search in Google Scholar
[8] Soynika O.A., Slatt R.M., Identification and microstratigraphy of hyperpycnites and turbidites in Cretaceous Lewis Shale, Wyoming. Sedimentology, 2008, 55, 1117–1133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2007.00938.x10.1111/j.1365-3091.2007.00938.xSearch in Google Scholar
[9] Singh P., Lithofacies and sequence stratigraphic framework of the Barnett Shale, northeast Texas. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, 2008 Search in Google Scholar
[10] Slatt R.M., Philp P.R., O’Brien N., Abousleiman Y., Singh P., Eslinger E.V., Perez R., Portas R., Baruch E.T., Marfurt K.J., Madrid-Arroyo S., Pore-to-regional scale, integrated characterization workflow for unconventional gas shales, in Breyer, J., ed., Shale reservoirs — unconventional wisdom: American Association of Petroleum Geologist Special Publication, (in press) Search in Google Scholar
[11] Nakajima T., Hyperpycnites deposited 700 km away from river mouths in the Central Japan Sea. J. Sediment. Res., 2006, 76, 60–73 http://dx.doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2006.1310.2110/jsr.2006.13Search in Google Scholar
[12] Mulder T., Chapron E., Flood deposits in continental and marine environments: character and significance. In: Slatt R.M., Zavala C. (Eds.), Sediment transfer from shelf to deepwater — revisiting the delivery mechanisms. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Studies in Geology, 2010, 61, 1–30 Search in Google Scholar
[13] Slatt R.M., O’Brien N.R., Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales: contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in finegrained rocks. Am. Assoc. Petr. Geol. B., (in press) Search in Google Scholar
[14] Schieber J., Southard J., Thaisen K., Accretion of mudstone beds from migrating floccule ripples. Science, 2007, 318, 1760–1763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.114700110.1126/science.1147001Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] Loucks R. G., Ruppel S.C., Mississippian Barnett Shale: lithofacies and depositional setting of a deepwater shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin, Texas. Am. Assoc. Petr. Geol. B., 2007, 92, 579–601 10.1306/11020606059Search in Google Scholar
[16] Rine J.M., Ginsburg R.N., Depositional facies of a mud shoreface in Suriname, South America. J. Sediment. Petrol., 1985, 55, 633–652 Search in Google Scholar
[17] Andrews R.D., Production decline curves and payout thresholds of horizontal Woodford wells in the Arkoma Basin, Oklahoma. Shale Shaker, 2010, 60, 103–112 and 147–156 Search in Google Scholar
[18] Hennings S., Shale Gas Resources and Development, IRR’s Inaugural Shale Gas Briefing, Brisbane, March 30, 2010 Search in Google Scholar
[19] Loucks R.G., Reed R. M., Ruppel S.C., Jarvie D.M., Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale. J. Sediment. Res., 2009, 79, 848–861 http://dx.doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2009.09210.2110/jsr.2009.092Search in Google Scholar
[20] O’Brien N.R., Thyne G., Slatt R.M., Morphology of hydrocarbon droplets during migration: Visual example from the Monterey Formation (Miocene), California. Am. Assoc. Petr. Geol. B., 1996, 80, 1710–1718 10.1306/64EDA140-1724-11D7-8645000102C1865DSearch in Google Scholar
[21] Philp R.R., Gilbert T.D., Biomarker distributions in Australian oils predominantly derived from terrigenous source material. Org. Geochem., 1986, 10, 69–79 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(86)90010-010.1016/0146-6380(86)90010-0Search in Google Scholar
[22] Rodriguez M., Norelis D., Geochemical characterization of gases from the Barnett Shale, Forth Worth Basin, Texas. M.Sc. thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, 2007 Search in Google Scholar
[23] Rowe H.D., Loucks R.G., Ruppel S.C., Rimmer S.M., Mississippian Barnett formation, Fort Worth Basin, Texas: bulk geochemical inferences and Mo-TOC constraints on the severity of hydrographic restriction. Chem. Geol., 2008, 257, 6–25 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.08.00610.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.08.006Search in Google Scholar
[24] Fang H., Jianyu C., Yongchuan S., Yaozong L., Application of organic facies studies to sedimentary basin analysis: a case study from the Yitong Graben, China. Org. Geochem., 1993, 20, 27–42 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(93)90078-P10.1016/0146-6380(93)90078-PSearch in Google Scholar
[25] Miceli-Romero A.A., Geochemical characterization of the Woodford Shale, central and southeastern Oklahoma. M.Sc. thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, 2010 Search in Google Scholar
[26] Ferworn K., Zumberge J., Reed J., Brown S., Gas character anomalies found in highly productive shale gas wells, 2008 http://www.papgrocks.org/ferworn_ p.pdf Search in Google Scholar
[27] Reed J., Brown S., Zumberge J., A best practices approach for shale gas characterization, Houston Geol. Soc. U.S. Gulf Region Mudstone/Shale Technical Program, 2010 Search in Google Scholar
[28] Rodriguez N.D., Philp R.P., Geochemical characterization of gases from the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Forth Worth Basin, Texas. Am. Assoc. Petr. Geol. B., 2010, 94, 1641–1656 10.1306/04061009119Search in Google Scholar
[29] Slatt R.M., Rodriguez N.R., Comparative sequence stratigraphy and organic geochemistry of unconventional gas shales: commonality or coincidence?: Journal of Natural Gas Engineering and Science, (in press) Search in Google Scholar
[30] Hammes U., Eastwood R., Rowe H.D., Reed R.M., Addressing conventional parameters in unconventional shale-gas systems: depositional environment, petrography, geochemistry, and petrophysics of the Haynesville shale. In: Carr T., D’Agostino T., Ambrose W.A., Pashin J., Rosen N.C. (Eds.), Unconventional Energy Resources: Making the Unconventional Conventional, 29th Annual GCSSEPM Foundation Bob F. Perkins Research Conference, Houston, 2009, 181–202 Search in Google Scholar
[31] Hammes U., Hamlin H.S., Eastwood R., Facies characteristics, depositional environments, and petrophysical characteristics of the Haynesville and Bossier shale-gas plays of east Texas and northwest Louisiana. Houston Geological Society Bulletin, 2010, 59–63 Search in Google Scholar
[32] Hammes U., Frébourg G., Haynesville and Bossier mudrocks: A facies and sequence stratigraphic investigation, east Texas and Louisiana, USA. Mar. Petrol. Geol. (in press) Search in Google Scholar
[33] Hammes U., Hamlin H.S., Ewing T.E., Geologic analysis of the upper JurassicHaynesville shale in east Texas and west Louisiana. Am. Assoc. Petr. Geol. B., 2011, 95, 1643–1666 10.1306/02141110128Search in Google Scholar
[34] Bohacs K., Lazar R., Sequence stratigraphy in finegrained rocks at the field to flow-unit scale: insights for correlation, mapping and genetic controls. In: Applied Geoscience Conference, 2010, Applied Geoscience Conference of US Gulf Region, Mudstones as unconventional shale gas/oil reservoirs, Houston Geolological Society Shale Gas Technical Program, 8–9 February 2010 Search in Google Scholar
[35] Van Wagoner J.C., Mitchum R.M., Campion K.M., Rahmanian V.D., Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs, cores, and outcrops: concepts for highresolution correlation of time and facies. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Methods in Exploration Series, 1990, 7, 55 10.1306/Mth7510Search in Google Scholar
[36] Wang F.P., Gale J.F.W., Screening criteria for shalegas systems. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 2009, 59, 779–793 Search in Google Scholar
[37] Sierra R., Tran M.H., Abousleiman Y.N., Slatt R.M., Woodford Shale mechanical properties and impacts of lithofacies: 44th U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium and 5th U.S.-Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium, Salt Lake City, 2010, ARMA10-461 Search in Google Scholar
[38] Slatt R.M., Abousleiman Y., Merging sequence stratigraphy and geomechanics for unconventional gas shales. The Leading Edge, 2011, 30, 274–282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.356725810.1190/1.3567258Search in Google Scholar
[39] Terracina J.M., Turner J.M., Collins D.H., Spillars S.E., Proppant selection and its effect on the results of fracturing treatments performed in shale formations: Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference, placecountry-regionItaly, September, 2010, SPE 135502, 17 10.2118/135502-MSSearch in Google Scholar
[40] Baruch E.T., Slatt R.M., Marfurt K.J., Seismic analysis of the Barnett Shale and Ellenburger unconformity southwest of Newark East Field, Fort Worth Basin, Texas. In: Breyer J. (Ed.), Shale Reservoirs— Unconventional Wisdom. American Association of Petroleum Geological Special Publication, (in press) Search in Google Scholar
[41] Chopra S., Marfurt K.J., Seismic attributes for prospect identification and reservoir characterization. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Geophysical Development Series, 2007, 11, 464 10.1190/1.9781560801900Search in Google Scholar
[42] Milner M., McLin R., Petriello J., Imaging texture and porosity in mudstons and shales: comparison of secondary and ion-milled backscatter SEM methods, Canadian Society for Unconventional Gas CSUG/SPE 138975, 2010, 10 10.2118/138975-MSSearch in Google Scholar
[43] Penn Energy Newsletter, 10 March, 2011 Search in Google Scholar
[44] Oil and Gas J., Aug. 12, 2011 Search in Google Scholar
[45] AAPG Explorer, Nov. 2010 Search in Google Scholar
[46] Totten M.W., Jr., Electron probe micro-analysis of the Woodford Shale, south central placeStateOklahoma, M.Sc. thesis, Univ. Oklahoma, 2011 Search in Google Scholar
[47] Zheng M., Rock-based characterization of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi gas shale in the southwest Sichuan Basin, China: unpub. M.S. thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, 2011 Search in Google Scholar
[48] Slatt R.M., Portas R., Buckner N., Abousleiman Y., O’Brien N., Tran M., Sierra R., Philp P., Miceli-Romero A., Davis R., Wawrzyniec T., Outcrop/behind outcrop (quarry), multiscale characterization of the Woodford gas shale, Oklahoma. In: Breyer J. (Ed.), Shale reservoirs—unconventional wisdom: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Special Publication, (in press) Search in Google Scholar
[49] May J.A., Anderson D.S., Mudrock reservoir deposition and stratigraphy: Not homogenous, not boring, AAPG/SEG/SPE/SPWLA Hedberg Conference “Critical Assessment of Shale Resource Plays”, 5–10 December 2010, Austin, Texas Search in Google Scholar
[50] Badra H., Field characterization and analog modeling of fractures in the Woodford Shale, southeast Oklahoma, M.Sc. thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, 2011 Search in Google Scholar
© 2011 Versita Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
