Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access September 12, 2022

Investigating the Effect of Recycled Cotton Included Fabrics on the Thermal Behaviour by Using a Female Thermal Manikin

  • Özlem Kurtoğlu Necef EMAIL logo , Derya Tama Birkocak , Arzu Kılıç , Serkan Boz , Maria Jose Abreu and Ziynet Öndoğan
From the journal AUTEX Research Journal

Abstract

In recent years, with the increase in global awareness of environmental problems, the term “sustainability” became more important for apparel manufacturers and consumers. Therefore, recycling of wastes plays a significant role in environmental sustainability by converting the wastes into raw materials. This study focused on recycled cotton-included fabrics, to evaluate the effect of these fabrics on thermal comfort properties. In this context, first, the 45% recycled cotton/55% polyester blended yarns and 50% virgin cotton/50% blended yarns were obtained. Afterwards, single jersey and rib-structured fabrics were knitted using these yarns. The thermal comfort tests were performed on the fabrics and four long sleeve rounded neck shirts then were manufactured using these fabrics to test by the thermal manikin method. Results showed that the yarns including recycled cotton led to a decrease in the values in air permeability of the fabrics and in the effective clothing insulation of the garments. In contrast, it was observed that, including recycled cotton increased the thermal resistance values of the fabrics.

1. Introduction

As a result of world population growth, consumption, and therefore the amount of waste, increases day by day, whereas the resources to make primary synthetic fibers are becoming less and less. Therefore, the recovery of waste and the development of related technologies have become inevitable. Obtaining secondary raw materials from recyclable wastes both reduces the raw material requirement of the industry and contributes to the economy. The biggest advantage of recycling is that it helps conserve natural resources. In recycling, both nature is protected and raw material costs are reduced in terms of production and additional energy efficiency is provided [1]. However, recycling is an important concept, not only for energy and water saving, but also for a sustainable life in the world [2].

The increased awareness of the clothing industry in terms of fashion and design has also changed the production processes in the industry [3]. The apparel products are designed and manufactured quickly and cheaply; therefore, textile consumption and the need for fiber and fabric are constantly increasing. Until 2025, it is estimated that total fiber production will increase by 3.7% every year [4]. To solve this increasing problem in the textile and apparel industry, it is important to use recycled materials [4], which give an added value to the products [5].

In the literature, there have been many studies on recycled materials, such as recycled polyester (PES) fibers as well as recycled cotton (r-Co) fibers for manufacturing recycled fibers, included garments. The studies on recycled PES fibers are more common [5—], whereas the studies on r-Co fibers are limited due to the lower quality of r-Co fibers. Possible cotton (Co) reuse applications depend on the quality and properties of waste Co sources. The quality of pre-consumer waste Co is mostly easier to assess than the quality of post-consumer Co affected by different wear and treatment conditions and unknown fiber blends [10]. These materials in different qualities are re-manufactured for the automotive, aeronautic, home building, furniture, mattress, coarse yarn, home furnishings, paper, apparel, and other industries [11]. Recycled Co even found a place in the smart textiles research field. Chen et al. [12] developed flexible sensors by combining natural rubber latex with carbonized waste Co fabrics.

The process of collecting and recycling Co fiber waste has significant importance in order to obtain r-Co fibers that are appropriate to use in garment manufacturing. The studies mostly focused on the recycling of Co fiber waste obtained during yarn production. Liu et al. [13] studied the production of regenerated cellulosic fibers from Co waste. Halimi et al. [1415], Hasani and Tabatabaei [16], Wanassi et al. [17], and Kılıc et al. [18] investigated the recycling of Co fibers from waste Co yarns.

Some studies also exist in the literature which investigate the mechanical recycling process for Co fibers from fabric waste. Kurtoğlu et al. [2] aimed to investigate the use of recycled garments obtained by evaluating fabric scraps, and they concluded that recycled garments obtained from fabric scraps could be used in the apparel manufacturing industry. Telli and Babaarslan [5] aimed to produce denim from recycled yarns; they recovered Co fibers derived from the raw materials in the denim fabric production process and the recovered PES fibers recovered from PET bottle waste. In the study conducted by Utebay et al. [19], the Co textiles collected from pre-consumer knitted waste were sorted regarding the fabric tightness and the applied finishing treatments.

Only limited studies have been encountered in the literature in terms of clothing comfort properties of recycled fibers, including garments. In the research conducted by Vadicherla and Saravanan [9], the thermal comfort properties of single jersey fabrics produced by recycled PES and Co blended yarns at different blending ratios, frequency and loop length were investigated. Dhanapal and Dhanakodi [20] studied the moisture management properties of socks made from recycled PES, virgin Co, and its blends. Gun et al. [21] and Celep et al. [22] analyzed the thermal conductivity, the thermal resistance, the thermal absorptivity, and the air permeability values of fabrics, including r-Co fibers.

In these limited studies, thermal comfort properties of recycled fibers, including fabrics, were only evaluated in two-dimensional fabric forms; however, investigating the thermal insulation of clothing should also be considered. When the fabric is transformed to the garment form and worn by the individual, the thermal comfort properties could vary according to the environmental conditions and even to the garment fit. Therefore, thermal manikins, which measure the heat flux over the whole body surface area [23], are inevitably used to evaluate the clothing insulation due to their advantages, namely, simplicity and repeatability of the tests [24]. In this research, besides investigating the thermal resistance and air permeability properties of virgin as well as r-Co fabrics, effective clothing insulation was evaluated using the thermal manikin method.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

In this study, the pre-consumer knitted fabric scraps were collected from a garment company. The collected scraps comprised fabrics produced with various yarn counts, spinning, and knitting parameters, but the composition was 100% Co. Afterwards, all scraps were classified according to yarn count, color, and fabric type. When the required number of scraps was collected, the shredding process was performed by a company located in Uşak province. The shredded r-Co fibers were blended with PES fibers in a blow room. The ring spinning process was performed in order to obtain 45% r-Co/55% PES yarns. At the same time, virgin Co fibers were blended with PES fibers and 50% Co/50% PES ring yarns were manufactured with the same production parameters.

Afterwards, using these yarns, the four knitted fabrics were produced by a company located in Izmir province. The single jersey and rib structures were manufactured using a Mayer & Cie circular knitting machine. In Table 1, the raw materials, the yarn counts, knitting structures, and knitting parameters are presented for all fabrics.

Table 1.

Fabrics properties of samples

Sample Number Composition Yarn Count Knitting Structure Machine Diameter Machine Gauge Feed Type Mass per Unit Area (g/m2) Fabric Density
Wales per cm Courses per cm
SN-1 45% r-Co/55% PES 30/1 single jersey 30″ E28 positive 149.7 15 22
SN-2 50% Co/50% PES 30/1 single jersey 30″ E28 positive 163.8 15 26
SN-3 45% r-Co/55% PES 30/1 1×1 Rib 30″ E24 positive 168.1 18 18
SN-4 50% Co/50% PES 30/1 1×1 Rib 30″ E24 positive 182.1 20 18

In order to evaluate the thermal insulation using a thermal manikin, long sleeve rounded neck shirts were produced from the evaluated fabrics.

2.2. Methods

Before performing the tests, all samples were conditioned at least 24 hours in standard atmospheric conditions (constant ambient temperature of 20 ± 2 ºC, relative humidity of 65 ± 2%).

2.2.1. Yarn Tensile Strength

The obtained yarns’ tensile properties were evaluated using Zwick Roell Z010 testing equipment. The breaking force (cN/dtex) and elongation percent (%) at the break of the yarns. Ten measures were performed for both samples according to ISO 2062:2009 standard [25].

2.2.2. Air Permeability

Air permeability is an important property that determines the ability of air to flow through the fabric. Ten repetitions were conducted for each fabric using the Textest FX 3300 air permeability instrument (Textest Instruments AG, Switzerland) at a pressure of 100Pa in 20 cm2 measurement area according to ISO 9237:1995 standard [26].

2.2.3. Thermal Resistance and Absorptivity

Thermal resistance of a fabric is described as the ability of a fabric to resist heat flow. The thermal resistance values were measured using the Alambeta instrument (Technical University of Liberec, Czech Republic), which presents the thermal absorptivity, the thermal conductivity, and the fabric thickness values as well. All tests were performed with five repetitions.

2.2.4. Effective Clothing Insulation

In order to calculate the effective clothing insulation of fabrics, the tests with a female thermal manikin (PT-Teknik, Denmark) were conducted for all samples. For this purpose, long sleeve rounded neck shirts were produced from each fabric (SN-1, SN-2, SN-3, and SN-4). The thermal manikin has a similar size and configurations as an adult woman. It comprises 20 sections and can only sense dry heat transfer. The thermal manikin was dressed in the manufactured shirts for each test and throughout the period of tests, the thermal manikin was hung inside a climatic chamber, which is able to achieve desired climatic conditions. All tests were performed at constant ambient temperature of 20 ± 0.5 °C and relative humidity of 60 ± 5%, where standard atmospheric conditions were attempted in order to make comparisons with the obtained thermal resistance data. The constant skin temperature mode was chosen for the tests and 33 ± 0.2 °C as skin temperature of thermal manikin was set regarding to ISO 9920:2007 standard [27].

The thermal manikin was placed with its legs hanging straight and the arms hanging straight at its sides (Figure 1). The testing time for each shirt was 30 minutes and the data were observed and recorded with the software-installed computer (Figure 1). The effective clothing insulation values (Icle) were calculated regarding to the global method. This method assumes that the thermal manikin has only one segment; thus, first, the sum of all heat losses in weighted areas for 20 sections was calculated. Afterwards, the thermal clothing insulation (IT) was calculated according to the following equation ISO 15831 [28]; [2930]:

(1) IT=i(fixtsi)t0(fixQsi),

where fi is the relationship between the surface area of the segment “i” of the manikin (Ai) and the total surface area of the manikin A (fi = Ai/A); t0 is the air temperature within the climatic chamber [°C]; tsi is the skin surface temperature of the body segment “i” of the manikin [°C]; and Qsi is the sensible heat flux of the manikin obtained by area (W/m2).

Figure 1. The shirt worn by thermal manikin (left) and an image of the software-installed computer during the test (right).
Figure 1.

The shirt worn by thermal manikin (left) and an image of the software-installed computer during the test (right).

It is a fact that the IT does not show the actual thermal insulation value of the sample due to the insulation property of the air layer. Therefore, the thermal insulation of the boundary air layer (Ia) needs to be considered, and it is determined by testing a nude manikin at the same climatic conditions. The Icle, consisting of the difference between IT and Ia is calculated by Eq. (2),

(2) Icle=ITTa.

2.3. Data Evaluation

Statistical analysis was performed by using the latest version of the SPSS statistical analysis package software. Test results were evaluated according to p values by using ANOVA t-tests analysis to determine whether the effect of raw material and knitted structure has a significant effect on thermal parameters (air permeability, thermal resistance, thermal absorptivity, and effective clothing insulation) of fabrics. When p value was lower than 0.05 (p < 0.05), it was considered to be significant.

3. Results and Discussion

In this research, the tensile strength and elongation percent of yarns were measured; the results are presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

Tensile strength and elongation percent of yarns

Yarn Composition Tensile Strength (cN/dtex) Elongation (%)
%45 r-Co/%55 PES 2.179 10.254
%50 Co/%50 PES 2.774 9.812

The tensile strength of PES yarns is higher than that of Co yarns, and as the amount of PES in Co/PES blends increases, the tensile strength and elongation values increase [31,32]. Supportively, the elongation value of 45% r-Co/55% PES yarn is higher than the elongation value of 50% Co/50% PES yarn (Table 2), which is thought to be the result of the increase in the amount of PES content in 45% r-Co/55% PES yarn. On the contrary, the tensile strength of 50% Co/50% PES yarn is higher than the tensile strength of 45% r/Co-55% PES yarn. Although 45% r-Co/55% PES yarn contains a higher percentage of PES, it is thought that this is due to the lower breaking strength value of r-Co compared to virgin Co [31].

The thermal resistance was measured using the Alambeta instrument as well as a thermal manikin. Thermal resistance of a fabric is described as the ability of a fabric to resist heat flow. Consistent with the literature, the fabrics knitted with r-Co had greater thermal resistance results than the fabrics knitted with virgin Co for both single jersey and rib constructions. As is known, thermal resistance shows a linear ratio with fabric thickness; therefore, the increase in fabric thickness increases the thermal resistance [21], and it is generally accepted that the fabric thickness is one of the main factors influencing thermal resistance [33]. Table 3 shows the thermal test values for all samples. In support of the existing literature, in Table 3, the fabric thickness values were in linear manner with thermal resistance values (Figure 2). Moreover, in the research conducted by Celep et al. [22], it was found that the single jersey fabrics knitted with r-Co have greater thermal resistance results, and it was suggested that the garments manufactured with r-Co-included fabrics would be used in cold environmental conditions.

Figure 2. The thermal resistance and the fabric thickness values of samples.
Figure 2.

The thermal resistance and the fabric thickness values of samples.

Thermal absorptivity characterizes the warm-cool feeling of a garment during the first contact of a fabric with the human skin [34]. The higher the thermal absorptivity of the fabric, the cooler the feeling. Regarding Table 3, r-Co-included single jersey fabric had the greatest thermal absorptivity; namely, it had the coolest feeling during the first contact with the skin. In terms of knitting structure, single jersey fabrics had higher results than 1×1 rib fabrics due to their more uniform, flat, and smooth fabric surface. The surface property of a fabric has great importance in thermal absorptivity, i.e., a higher contact area increases the cooler feeling [35].

Table 3.

Thermal properties of the fabrics

Sample Number Fabric Thickness (mm) Thermal Resistance (m2 K/W) Thermal Absorptivity (W s1/2/m2 K) Air Permeability (l/m2 sec)
Mean Std Dev. Mean Std Dev. Mean Std Dev. Mean Std Dev.
SN-1 0.58 0.013 0.0121 0.0002 133.71 5.93 630.6 16.652
SN-2 0.53 0.008 0.0111 0.0331 115.15 15.53 655 49.905
SN-3 0.87 0.017 0.0175 0.0004 115.86 6.78 1092.2 88.962
SN-4 0.75 0.011 0.0156 0.0005 111.16 5.55 1496 66.933

Air permeability is the ability of air to flow through the fabric, and in addition to the fabric thickness, it is affected by the fabric porosity [36]. Regarding the air permeability results, it was observed that SN-3 and SN-4 had higher air permeability values than SN-1 and SN-2 fabrics because of the knit structures (Table 3), similar with the existing literature highlighting that rib fabrics have higher air permeability than single jersey fabrics [37]. When the effect of recycled fibers on air permeability tests were evaluated, it was seen that the fabrics including recycled fibers led to a decrease in the air permeability values. Moreover, although SN-1 is the lightest fabric, its air permeability value is the lowest compared to other fabrics. This is due to the fact that the recycled fibers cause unevenness in the yarns [2], which creates an extra filling effect between the loops forming the fabric. Regarding the statistical analyses (Table 4), it was observed that using recycled yarns had a significant effect on the air permeability values for rib knitted structure, whereas there was not any significant difference for the jersey knitted structure.

Table 4.

t-Test results of thermal resistance and air permeability values regarding raw material

Knitted Structure F p
Thermal resistance single jersey 0.888 0.365
rib 53.594 0.000
Air permeability single jersey 1.076 0.330
rib 65.779 0.000

The ANOVA statistical analysis shows that there were not significant differences (p > 0.05) between the single jersey fabrics containing r-Co fibers on the thermal resistance and the air permeability (Table 4). On the contrary, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the 1×1 rib fabrics. In addition, the statistical analysis (Table 5) showed that the knitted structure had a statistically significant effect on air permeability values and on thermal resistance of r-Co-included fabric. The fabric manufactured from virgin Co yarns did not show significant differences regarding the knitted structure.

Table 5.

t-Test results of thermal resistance and air permeability values regarding the knitted structure

Sample Number F p
Thermal resistance SN-1 761.336 0.000
SN-2 0.432 0.524
Air permeability SN-3 130.058 0.000
SN-4 507.339 0.000

Table 6 presents the results of the shirts manufactured for all samples obtained with the thermal manikin tests. The total thermal insulation (IT) and the effective thermal insulation (Icle) values were calculated using the global method. According to the obtained results, Icle of virgin Co shirts were greater than r-Co shirts for both single jersey and rib constructions.

Table 6.

Thermal insulation values of the manufactured shirts and the air layer

Sample Number It (m2K/W) Ia (m2K/W) Icle (m2K/W) Icle (clo)
Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev.
SN-1 0.128 0.0064 0.100 0.0028 0.032 0.0048 0.208 0.041
SN-2 0.139 0.0033 0.100 0.0028 0.043 0.0028 0.277 0.021
SN-3 0.134 0.0024 0.100 0.0028 0.039 0.0014 0.249 0.015
SN-4 0.138 0.0023 0.100 0.0028 0.042 0.0009 0.269 0.014

The thermal insulation of a fabric is of limited value for evaluating the thermal property when it is constructed into an ensemble. The thermal manikin enables the evaluation of the thermal insulation properties of garments by measuring the heat flux over the whole body surface area. As observed in this study, the thermal insulation of a fabric and a garment vary. Figure 3 shows the thermal resistance and Icle results of all samples. It can be clearly seen that, including r-Co affected Icle results of garments in a way opposite to thermal resistance results of fabrics.

Figure 3. Effective clothing insulation values of shirts and the thermal resistance values of fabrics.
Figure 3.

Effective clothing insulation values of shirts and the thermal resistance values of fabrics.

Table 7 presents the t-test results of effective clothing insulation values of the knitted fabrics considering the raw material. When the Icle results were compared with respect to the case of including r-Co, it was seen that in both knitted types, single jersey and rib, the Icle values showed significant differences.

Table 7.

t-test results of effective clothing insulation values

Sample Number N Mean Std. Dev. F p
Single jersey SN-1 29.00 0.032 0.001 102.67 0.000
SN-2 29.00 0.043 0.000
Rib SN-3 29.00 0.038 0.001 101.05 0.000
SN-4 29.00 0.042 0.001

4. Conclusion

Because of the importance of sustainability, recycled yarns have been widely used in the apparel industry. They are generally blended with PES or other textile fibers. In this study, in order to investigate the usability of fabrics, including recycled fibers, in the apparel industry, r-Co-contained fabrics were obtained and tested. Ne 30/1 yarns were produced with the blend ratio of 45% r-Co/55% PES. Afterwards, in order to compare with the recycled yarns, Ne 30/1 50% PES/50% Co yarns, which are widely used in the textile industry, were included in the study. Single jersey and rib fabrics were knitted by using these yarns under the same production conditions. The thermal properties were tested using a thermal manikin, an Alambeta instrument, and an air permeability instrument.

Regarding the obtained results, it was seen that, despite 45% r-Co/55% PES yarn containing a greater amount of PES, the r-Co caused a decrease in tensile strength value. Moreover, the fabrics, including recycled fibers, led to a decrease in air permeability values, whereas there were increases in thermal resistance values. It is a fact that the recycled yarns have higher hairiness and so a higher fabric thickness, which is thought to be the main reason for the decrease in air permeability values and the increase in thermal resistance values.

Regarding the thermal manikin test results, it was observed that, including r-Co affected Icle results of garments in the opposite way of thermal resistance results of fabrics. Therefore, it can be concluded that, in order to evaluate thermal insulation of a garment in real-use conditions, thermal manikin tests of garments are more effective than thermal resistance tests of fabrics.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding by the project 15-MUH-035 of Ege University funded by Scientific Research Projects Coordination as well as the funding by the project UIDB/00264/2020 of 2C2T – University of Minho, Center for Textile Science and Technology, funded by National Founds through FCT/MCTES. The authors also would like to thank Kempaş İplik Tekstil Ürünleri San. ve Tic. A.Ş. for supplying the yarns and Sun Holding A.Ş. for knitting the fabrics.

References

[1] Ersoy, Y., Zırapli, M. (2014). Importance of recycling spinning and yarn production methods. Duzce Uni. J. Sci. and Tech., 2, 425–432.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Kurtoğlu Necef, Ö., et al. (2013). A study on recycling the fabric scraps in apparel manufacturing industry. Tekst.ve Konfeksiyon, 23(3), 286–289.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Tama D., et al. (2016). The usability of 3D flattening in design and pattern preparation of tight fit garments. Çukurova Üni. J. The Fac. Engin. and Archit., 31(2), 169–173.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Eser, B., et al. (2016). Sustainability and recycling opportunities in the textile and apparel sector. Tekst. ve Mühendis, 23(101), 43–60.10.7216/1300759920162310105Search in Google Scholar

[5] Telli, A., Babaarslan, O. (2016). Commercialized denim fabric production with post-industrial and post-consumer wastes. Tekst. ve Konfeksiyon, 26(2), 213–220.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Telli, A., et al. (2012). Usage of PET bottle wastes in textile industry and contribution to sustainability. Tekst. ve Mühendis, 19(86), 49–55.10.7216/130075992012198607Search in Google Scholar

[7] Telli A., Özdil, N. (2015). Effect of recycled PET fibers on the performance properties of knitted fabrics. J. Engin. Fiber. and Fabric, 10(2), 47–60.10.1177/155892501501000206Search in Google Scholar

[8] Telli A., Babaarslan, O. (2017). Usage of recycled cotton and polyester fibers for sustainable staple yarn technology. Tekst. ve Konfeksiyon, 27(3), 224–233.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Vadicherla T., Saravanan, D. (2017). Thermal comfort properties of single jersey fabrics made from recycled polyester and cotton blended yarns. Indian J. Fibres Text. Res., 42(3), 318–324.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Johnson, S., et al. (2020). Supply chain of waste cotton recycling and reuse: a Review. AATCC J. Res., 7(special issue 1), 19–31.10.14504/ajr.7.S1.3Search in Google Scholar

[11] Hawley, J. M. (2006). Textile recycling: a system perspective. In: Wang, Y. (Ed.) Recycling in textiles. Woodhead Publishing Limited. (Cambridge, England).10.1533/9781845691424.1.7Search in Google Scholar

[12] Chen, X., et al. (2019). Environmentally friendly flexible strain sensor from waste cotton fabrics and natural rubber latex. Polym., 11(3), 404.10.3390/polym11030404Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Liu, W., et al. (2019). Eco-friendly post-consumer cotton waste recycling for regenerated cellulose fibers. Carbohydrate Polym., 206, 141–148.10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.10.046Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Halimi, M. T., et al. (2007). Effect of cotton waste and spinning parameters on rotor yarn quality. J. The Text. Inst. 98(5), 437–442.10.1080/00405000701547649Search in Google Scholar

[15] Halimi, M. T., et al. (2008). Cotton waste recycling: quantitative and qualitative assessment. Resources Conservation and Recyc., 52, 785–791.10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.11.009Search in Google Scholar

[16] Hasani, H., Tabatabaei, S.A. (2011). Optimizing spinning variables to reduce the hairiness of rotor yarns produced from waste fibres collected from the ginning process. Fibres Text. East. Eur., 19(3), 21–25.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Wanassi, B., et al. (2016). Values-added waste cotton yarn: optimization of recycling process and spinning of reclaimed fibers. Indust. Crops and Products, 87, 27–32.10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.020Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kilic, M., et al. (2019). Effects of waste cotton usage on properties of OE-rotor yarns and knitted fabrics. Indust. Textila, 70(3), 216–222.10.35530/IT.070.03.1560Search in Google Scholar

[19] Ütebay, B., et al. (2019). Effects of cotton textile waste properties on recycled fibre quality. J. Cleaner Produc., 222, 29–35.10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.033Search in Google Scholar

[20] Dhanapal, V. K., Dhanakodi, R. (2020). Influence of moisture management properties on socks made from recycled polyester, virgin cotton and its blends. Fibers Text. East. Eur., 4(142), 76–81.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Demiroz Gun, A., et al. (2016). Thermal properties of socks made from reclaimed fibre. The J. Text. Inst., 107(9), 1112–1121.10.1080/00405000.2015.1086197Search in Google Scholar

[22] Celep, G., et al. (2016). An investigation of thermal comfort properties of single jersey fabrics including recycled fibers. Duzce Uni. J. Sci. and Tech., 4, 104–112.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Holmear, I. (2005). Protection against cold. In: Shoshoo, R. (Ed.). Textiles in sport. Woodhead Publishing Limited (Cambridge, England).10.1201/9781439823804.ch12Search in Google Scholar

[24] Tama, D. et al. (2020). Evaluating the thermal comfort properties of Rize's traditional hemp fabric (Feretiko) using a thermal manikin. Materials Today: Proceedings, 31(2), 197–200.10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.063Search in Google Scholar

[25] ISO 2062:2009, Textiles — Yarns from packages — Determination of single-end breaking force and elongation at break using constant rate of extension.Search in Google Scholar

[26] ISO 9237:1995, Textiles – Determination of the permeability of fabrics to air.Search in Google Scholar

[27] ISO 9920:2007: Ergonomics of the thermal environment – Estimation of thermal insulation and water vapour resistance of a clothing ensemble.Search in Google Scholar

[28] ISO 15831:2004, Clothing – Physiological effects – Measurement of thermal insulation by means of a thermal manikin.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Oliveira, A.V.M., et al. (2008). Measurements of clothing insulation with a thermal manikin operating under the thermal comfort regulation mode: comparative analysis of the calculation methods. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 104, 679–688.10.1007/s00421-008-0824-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Tama, D. et al. (2019). Evaluating the effect of water-repellent finishing on thermal insulation properties of rowing shirts using a thermal manikin. Tekst. ve Konfeksiyon, 29(4), 279–288.10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.467276Search in Google Scholar

[31] Yuksekkaya, M. E, et al.. (2016). A comparative study of physical properties of yarns and fabrics produced from virgin and recycled fibers. J. of Engin. Fibers and Fabrics, 11(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/15589250160110020910.1177/155892501601100209Search in Google Scholar

[32] Kothari, V. K., et al. (2002). Tensile properties of polyester/cotton blended yarns, Indian J. of Fibre and Text. Research, 27, 48–51.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Amber, R. R. V., et al. (2015). Thermal and moisture transfer properties of sock fabrics differing in fiber type, yarn, and fabric structure. Text. Res. J., 85, 1269–1280.10.1177/0040517514561926Search in Google Scholar

[34] Mishra, R., et al. (2019). Nanoporous materials: In: Mishra R., Militky J. (Eds.). Nanotechnology in textiles: theory and application. Woodhead Publishing (Cambridge, England).10.1016/B978-0-08-102609-0.00007-9Search in Google Scholar

[35] Hes L., Loghin, C. (2009). Heat, moisture and air transfer properties of selected woven fabric in wet state. J. Fiber Bioengine. and Inform. 2, 141–149.10.3993/jfbi12200901Search in Google Scholar

[36] Selli F., Turhan, Y. (2016). Investigation of air permeability and moisture management properties of the commercial single jersey and rib knitted fabrics. Tekst. ve Konfeksiyon, 27(1), 27–31.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Selli, F., Turhan, Y. (2017). Investigation of air permeability and moisture management properties of the commercial single jersey and rib knitted fabrics. Textile and Apparel, 27(1), 27–31.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-09-12

© 2022 Özlem Kurtoğlu Necef et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 30.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/aut-2022-0020/html
Scroll to top button