The Making of a Totalitarian Surveillance Machine: Surveillance in Turkey Under AKP Rule
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines surveillance initiatives under the AKP rule in Turkey (2002-present). The AKP had first tested and perfected surveillance methods, including wiretapping, internet surveillance and surveillance by collaborator-informant networks, over its key opponents and dissidents to capture the state apparatus and later applied similar methods to govern the entire society. In the aftermath of the 2013 Gezi protests, surveillance began to have a mass character, even though targeted surveillance practices continued. Fearful of another popular public revolt, the AKP established a mass surveillance mechanism and empowered it by new amendments to security and communication laws, to pre-empt and suppress public dissent. The recent state of emergency measures following the failed coup attempt in July 2016 represented a further drift towards totalitarian surveillance. The personal liberties were suspended and the state of exception became a permanent condition.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Surveillance & Society uses a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
- The author. The author licenses the article to the Surveillance Studies Network (SSN) for inclusion in Surveillance & Society (S&S), right of first publication. The copyright to the article remains with the author and any subsequent commercial reuse must be agreed by both parties.
- Non-commercial Users. SSN authorises all persons to use material published in S&S in any manner that is not primarily intended for or directed to commerical advantage or private monetary compensation, also provided that it is not modified and retains all attribution notices.
- Commercial Users. SSN retains the right to benefit from commerical reuse, in each specific case subject to the agreement of the author, and payment to SSN of a standard per-page fee (set by a vote of the Network and Editorial Board) by the Commercial User.
- Surveillance & Society supports open access archives and the free distribution of the results of academic work. Authors are encouraged to place copies of the final published version of their article in their university and / or other open access archives. We only ask that you make sure to include a link to the original published version on the Surveillance & Society website.
References
Agamben, G. 2005. State of Exception, trans. by K. Attell, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Akser, M. and Baybars-Hawks, B. 2012. Media and Democracy in Turkey: Toward a Model of Neoliberal Media Autocracy. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication 5(3): 302–321.
Amnesty International. 2012. Amnesty International Report on Turkey. Istanbul: Uluslararası Af Örgütü Türkiye Şubesi.
Arendt, H. 1976 [1951]. The Origins of Totalitarianism. Orlando: Harvest.
Arendt, H. 2006 [1954]. “Preface: The Gap Between Past and Future” In Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought, New York: Penguin, 3-16.
Benjamin, W. 1968. Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Ed. Hannah Arendt and Trans Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken.
Berksoy, B. 2013. Military, Police and Intelligence in Turkey: Recent Transformations and Needs for Reform. Istanbul: TESEV Publications.
Cohen, S. 1993. Human Rights and Crimes of the State: The Culture of Denial. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 26(2): 97-115.
Deveci H. 2016. Yeniden Ergenekon:Bir Hukuk Katliamının İbret Verici Öyküsü, Türkiye Politika ve Araştırma Merkezi (Research Turkey), 5(6):.74 – 85.
Epstein, C. 2004. The Stasi: New Research on the East German Ministry of State Security, Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History. 5 (2): 321-348.
HRW. 2014. Turkey: Internet Freedom, Rights in Sharp Decline. Human Rights Watch, Available at: https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/09/02/turkey-internet-freedom-rights-sharp-decline
Koloğlu, O. 1987. Abdülhamit Gerçeği. Istanbul: Gur Yayınları.
Lyon, D. 2015. Surveillance After Snowden, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
OHCHR. 2017. Report on the human rights situation in South-East Turkey July 2015 to December 2016. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/TR/OHCHR_South-East_TurkeyReport_10March2017.pdf#sthash.c6fifoZ6.dpuf
Kasaba, R. 2008. Introduction. In: Kasaba R (eds) The Cambridge History of Turkey: Volume (4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–8.
McCoy. AW. 2009. Policing America's Empire. The United States, the Philippines and the Rise of the Surveillance State. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Saka, E. 2016. Siyasi trollük örneği olarak Aktroller. Birikim, (322): 17-21.
TBMM. 2013. Haberlesme Ozgurlugune ve Ozel Hayatin Gizliligine Yonelik Ihlallerin Tespiti ve Onlenmesine Iliskin Tedbirlerin Belirlenmesi Amaciyla Kurulan Melis Arastirmasi Komisyonu Raporu. TBMM Tutanak Dergisi: 17 Nisan 2013.
Tuğal, C. 2016. The Fall of the Turkish Model, London: Verso.
Yesil, B. 2016. Media in new Turkey: the origins of an authoritarian neoliberal state. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Zedner, L. 2009. Security. London and New York: Routledge.