On the Military Crowns Awarded after Naulochus

Article Authentication required
Subscibe in publisher´s online store Share via email
On the Military Crowns Awarded after Naulochus

Historical Circumstances and Wider Significance

Dart, Christopher James; Vervaet, Frederik Juliaan

From the journal Historia Historia, Volume 67, September 2018, issue 3

Published by Franz Steiner Verlag

article, 22148 Words
Original language: English
Historia 2018, pp 313-345
https://doi.org/10.25162/historia-2018-0012

Abstract Related content References

Abstract

The epic naval battle of Naulochus, one of the watersheds in Caesar Octavianus’ rise to the rule of the Roman world, earned the victor, his subordinate commanders and his soldiers many special honours and distinctions. While some of these are well known and have received considerable attention, others remain obscure or have been largely overlooked. This paper seeks to enhance and deepen our understanding of the military crowns awarded respectively to M. Vipsanius Agrippa (cos. 37, 28, 27) and all those who took part in the fighting at Naulochus: namely the corona naualis (naval crown) and the corona oleaginea (olive crown). A careful reappraisal of both awards suggests that the modalities of conferral, as well as the particular usage of both decorations, represent notable, if calculated, departures from republican practice, accounting for striking examples of the novelties that marked the civil wars following the assassination of C. Iulius Caesar on the Ides of March in 44. As a corollary, the analysis highlights a distinctive but hitherto widely ignored feature of the ovation (also known as the lesser triumph) and enhances our appreciation of the origins of the Augustan ornamenta triumphalia. This leads to reflections upon the wider historical significance of the honours of 36 as milestones on the road to the so-called Augustan Principate and early indicators of some of the hallmarks of Augustan autocratic statecraft.

Author information

Christopher James Dart

Frederik Juliaan Vervaet

Keywords

Battle of Naulochus | Naval crown | Olive crown | M. Vipsanius Agrippa | Caesar Octavianus/Augustus | Ovation | Naval triumph

Related content

References

  • 1. Bastien, J.-L. 2007, Le triomphe romain et son utilisation politique à Rome aux trois derniers siècles de la République. Rome. DOI 10.3917/hyp.981.0131
  • 2. Beard, M. 2007, The Roman Triumph. Cambridge, MA & London.
  • 3. Bergmann, B. 2010, Der Kranz des Kaisers. Genese und Beduetung einer römischen Insignie. Berlin & New York.
  • 4. Bergmann, B. 2011, “Die corona navalis - eine Sonderehrung für Agrippa”, JDAI 126: 77-106.
  • 5. Bleicken, J. 1990, Zwischen Republik und Prinzipat. Zum Charakter des Zweiten Triumvirats. Göttingen.
  • 6. Boyce, A. A. 1942, “The Origin of ornamenta triumphalia”, CP 37: 130-141. DOI 10.1086/362593
  • 7. Broughton, T. R. S. 1951, The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. Volume I., 509 B. C. - 100 B. C., Cleveland.
  • 8. Broughton, T. R. S. 1952, The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. Volume II. 99 B. C. - 31 B. C., Cleveland.
  • 9. Cichorius, C. 1922, Römische Studien. Historisches, Epigraphisches, Literargeschichtliches aus vier Jahrhunderten Roms. Leipzig.
  • 10. Crawford RRC, M. Crawford, 1974, Roman Republican Coinage, Vol. 1 & 2. Cambridge.
  • 11. Dart, C. J. / Vervaet, F. J. 2011, “The Significance of the Naval Triumph in Roman History (260-29 BCE)”, ZPE 176: 267-280.
  • 12. Ehlers, W. 1939, “Triumphus”, in: RE 7A.1, Stuttgart, cc. 493-511.
  • 13. Ehrenberg, V. / Jones, A. H. M. 1976, Documents illustrating the Reigns of Augustus and Tiberius. Second Edition. Oxford.
  • 14. Fiebiger, H. O. 1901, “Corona”, in: RE 4.2, Stuttgart, cc. 1636-1643.
  • 15. Frandsen, P. S. 1836, M. Vipsanius Agrippa. Eine Historische Untersuchung über dessen Leben und Wirken. Altona.
  • 16. Gurval, R. A. 1995, Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War. Ann Arbor. DOI 10.3998/mpub.14819
  • 17. Hammond, M. 1933, The Augustan Principate. Cambridge, MA.
  • 18. Havener, W. 2016, Imperator Augustus: die diskursive Konstituierung der militärischen persona des ersten römischen Princeps. Stuttgart.
  • 19. Hinard, F. 1999, “Dion Cassius et l’abdication de Sylla”, REA 101: 427-432. DOI 10.3406/rea.1999.4775
  • 20. Itgenshorst, T. 2005, Tota illa pompa. Der Triumph in der römischen Republik. Göttingen. DOI 10.13109/9783666252600
  • 21. Itgenshorst, T. 2008. “Der Princeps triumphiert nicht. Vom Verschwinden des Siegesrituals in augusteischer Zeit”, in: H. Krasser, D. Pausch & I. Petrovic (eds.), Triplici invectus triumph. Der römische Triumph in augusteischer Zeit, Stuttgart, 27-51.
  • 22. Jordan, B. 2015, “The Fasti Consulares Capitolini and Caesar’s magistri equitum designati”, ZPE 196: 231-239.
  • 23. Jordan, B. 2017, “The Consular Provinciae of 44 BCE and the Collapse of the Restored Republic”, Hermes 145 (forthcoming).
  • 24. Kondratieff, E. 2004, “The Column and Coinage of C. Duilius: Innovations in Iconography in Large and Small Media in the Middle Republic”, Scripta Classica Israelica 23: 1-39.
  • 25. Kromayer, J. 1897, “Die Entwicklung der römischen Flotte vom Seeräuberkriege des Pompeius bis zur Schlacht von Actium”, Philologus 56: 426-491. DOI 10.1524/phil.1897.56.jg.426
  • 26. Laffi, U. 1993, Poteri triumvirali e organi repubblicani, in: A. Gara & D. Foraboschi (eds.) Il triumvirato costituente alla fine della repubblica romana. Scritti in Onore di Mario Attilio Levi, Como, 37-59.
  • 27. Lange, C. H. 2011, “The Battle of Actium: A Reconsideration”, Classical Quarterly - New Series 61: 608-623. DOI 10.1017/s0009838811000139
  • 28. Lange, C. H. 2013, “Triumph and civil war in the late Republic”, PBSR 81: 67-90.
  • 29. Lange, C. H. 2015, “Augustus’ Triumphal and Triumph-like Returns”, in: I. Östenberg, S. Malmberg & J. Bjørnebye (eds.), The Moving City. Processions, Passages and Promenades in Ancient Rome. London, 133-144.
  • 30. Lange, C. H. 2016, Triumphs in the Age of Civil War. The Late Republic and the Adaptability of Triumphal Tradition, London.
  • 31. Lange, C. H. / Madsen, J. M. 2016, Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden & Boston.
  • 32. Lange, C. H. / Vervaet, F. J. 2014, The Roman Republican Triumph. Beyond the Spectacle. Roma.
  • 33. Lintott, A. 1999, The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford.
  • 34. Maxfield, V. A. 1981, The Military Decorations of the Roman Army, London.
  • 35. Millar, F. 1964, A Study of Cassius Dio. Oxford.
  • 36. Millar, F. 2000, “The First Revolution: Imperator Caesar, 36-28 BC”, in: F. Paschoud, A. Giovannini & B. Grange (eds.), La révolution romaine après Ronald Syme. Bilans et perspectives. Genève, 1-30.
  • 37. Mix, E.R. 1970, Marcus Atilius Regulus: Exemplum Historicum. The Hague & Paris. DOI 10.2307/4347553
  • 38. Mommsen, Th. 18873, Römisches Staatsrecht, Vol. 1. Leipzig.
  • 39. de Montfaucon, B. 1722, Antiquity Explained and Represented in Sculptures, Vol. 3. (trans. D. Humphreys). London.
  • 40. Motte, A. F. 1872, Étude sur Marcus Agrippa. Gent & Paris.
  • 41. Murray, W. M. / Petsas, P. M. 1989, Octavian’s Campsite Memorial for the Actian War. Philadelphia. DOI 10.2307/4350922
  • 42. Oorthuijs, J. 2007, “Marines and Mariners in the Roman Imperial Fleets”, in: L. de Blois & E, Lo Cascio (eds.), The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC-AD 476): Economic, Social, Political, Religious and Cultural Aspects. Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B. C. - A. D. 476) Capri, March 29 - April 2, 2005. Leiden & Boston, 169-180.
  • 43. Pelikan Pittenger, M. R. 2008, Contested Triumphs. Politics, Pageantry, and Performance in Livy’s Republican Rome. Berkeley, L. A. & London.
  • 44. Pitassi, M. 2009, The Navies of Rome. Woodbridge.
  • 45. Ramsay, W. 1875, “Ovatio”, in: W. Smith (ed.), A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. London.
  • 46. Ramsay, W. / Marindin, G. E. 1891, “Ovatio”, in: W. Smith, W. Wayte & G. E. Marindin (eds.), A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. Third Edition, Revised and Enlarged, Vol. 2. London, 306 f.
  • 47. Reinhold, M. 1933, Marcus Agrippa. A Biography. Geneva, NY.
  • 48. Rich, A. 1875, “Corona”, in: W. Smith (ed.), A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. London, 359-363.
  • 49. Rich, J. 1990, Cassius Dio. The Augustan Settlement (Roman History 53-55.9). Warminster.
  • 50. Rich, J. 2014, “The Triumph in the Roman Republic: Frequency, Fluctuation, Policy”, in: C. H. Lange & F. J. Vervaet (eds.), The Roman Republican Triumph. Beyond the Spectacle, Roma, 197-258.
  • 51. Roddaz, J.-M. 1984, Marcus Agrippa. Rome.
  • 52. Rohde, G. 1942, “Ovatio”, in: RE 18.2, Stuttgart, cc. 1890-1903.
  • 53. Saddington, D. 2009, “Problems in the nomenclature of the personnel and the question of marines in the Roman fleets, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies - New Series 52: 123-132. DOI 10.1111/j.2041-5370.2009.tb00750.x
  • 54. Smith, W. 1890, “Corona”, in: W. Smith, W. Wayte & G. E. Marindin (eds.), A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. Third Edition, Revised and Enlarged, Vol. 1. London, 545-551.
  • 55. Steuart, E. M. 1925, The Annals of Quintus Ennius. Cambridge.
  • 56. Strzelecki, W. 1964, Cn. Naevii Belli Punici Carmen. Leipzig.
  • 57. Sumi, G. 2005, Ceremony and Power. Peforming Politics in Rome between Republic and Empire. Ann Arbor.
  • 58. Sumi, G. 2011, “Ceremony and the Emergence of Court Society in the Augustan Principate”, AJPh 132: 81-102. DOI 10.1353/ajp.2011.0008
  • 59. Syme, R. 1939, The Roman Revolution. Oxford.
  • 60. Taylor, L. R. 1936, “M. Titius and the Syrian Command”, JRS 26: 161-173.
  • 61. Vervaet, F. J. 2007, “The Scope and Historic Significance of the Lex Metilia de Aequando M. Minuci Magistri Equitum et Q. Fabi Dictatoris Iure (217 B. C. E.)”, SDHI 73: 197-232.
  • 62. Vervaet, F. J. 2010, “The Secret History. The Official Position of Imperator Caesar Divi filius from 31 to 27 BCE”, Ancient Society 40: 79-152.
  • 63. Vervaet, F. J. 2011a, “Reducing Senatorial Control over Provincial Commanders: A Forgotten Gabinian Law of 67 BCE”, in: O. Hekster & T. Kaizer (eds.), Frontiers in the Roman World. Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire, Leiden & Boston 2011, 265-290. DOI 10.1163/ej.9789004201194.i-378.57
  • 64. Vervaet, F. J. 2011b, “On the Order of Appearance in Imperator Caesar’s Third Triumph (15 August 29 BCE)”, Latomus 70: 96-102.
  • 65. Vervaet, F. J. 2014a, The High Command in the Roman Republic. The Principle of the summum imperium auspiciumque from 509 to 19 BCE, Stuttgart.
  • 66. Vervaet, F. J. 2014b, “‘Si neque leges nec mores cogunt.’ Beyond the Spectacle of Pompeius Magnus’ Public Triumphs”, in: C. H. Lange & F. J. Vervaet (eds.), The Roman Republican Triumph. Beyond the Spectacle, Roma, 131-148.
  • 67. Vervaet, F. J. 2015, “Crassus’ Command in the War against Spartacus (73-71 BCE): His Official Position, Forces and Political Spoils”, Klio 97: 405-414. DOI 10.1515/klio-2014-0047
  • 68. Vervaet, F. J. / Dart, C. J. 2016, “Last of the naval triumphs: revisiting some key Actian honours”, Journal of Roman Archaeology 29: 389-410. DOI 10.1017/s1047759400072196
  • 69. Welch, K. 2012, Magnus Pius. Sextus Pompeius and the Transformation of the Roman Republic. Swansea.