BODENTIERhoch4: A new citizen science tool for the determination and monitoring of soil organisms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25674/so94iss1id181Keywords:
biodiversity monitoring, Diplopoda, Chilopoda, project engagement, soil animal conservationAbstract
Although citizen science (CS) has proven to be a powerful tool to detect man-made biodiversity loss, existing CS monitoring programs are highly biased towards ‘charismatic’ species groups, while others are largely neglected and monitoring data are lacking. This is especially true for the diverse groups of soil dwelling animals. To close this data gap in Germany we started the first CS monitoring program for soil animals with special focus on the identification of terrestrial isopods (Oniscidea), centipedes (Chilopoda) and millipedes (Diplopoda): BODENTIERhoch4. The main functionalities of the combined web and mobile application are outlined. Moreover, we carried out training workshops with interested citizens to transfer basic knowledge of how to use the mobile application, to identify soil organisms and to upload acquired data to a repository. In an accompanying study, we investigated the interrelationship of workshop attendance and long-term commitment as citizen scientists in monitoring programs. Users of BODENTIERhoch4 that a) had attended and b) had not attended a workshop were asked to answer questions related to the efficiency and impact of the workshops. We found that workshop attendance significantly increased the participants estimated knowledge gain, interest in soil animals and, corresponding to that, willingness to further engage in the project. Our results may inspire future CS programs to offer training opportunities for prospective citizen scientists and thereby promote data quality as well as long-term engagement.
References
Asingizwe, D., P. Marijn Poortvliet, C. J. M. Koenraadt, A. J. H. van Vliet, C. M. Ingabire, L. Mutesa & C. Leeuwis (2020): Why (not) participate in citizen science? Motivational factors and barriers to participate in a citizen science program for malaria control in Rwanda. – PLoS ONE 15 [http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237396].
Bruckermann, T., J. Lorke, S. Rafolt, M. Scheuch, M. Aristeidou, H. Ballard, M. Bardy-Durchhalter, E. Carli, C. Herodotou, J. Kelemen-Finan & et al. (2018): Learning opportunities and outcomes in citizen science: a heuristic model for design and evaluation. – Electronic Proceedings of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) 2019 Conference: 889–898 [Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10213530].
Burkhardt, U., D. J. Russel, P. Decker, M. Döhler, H. Höfer, S. Lesch, S. Rick, J. Römbke, C. Trog, J. Vorwald, E. Wurst & W. E. R. Xylander (2014): The Edaphobase project of GBIF-Germany—a new online soil-zoological data warehouse. – Applied Soil Ecology 83: 3–12 [http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.03.021].
Deci, E. L. & R. M. Ryan (2012): Self-determination theory. – Handbook of theories of social psychology: 416–436 [http://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21].
Decker, P., J. Wesenberg, & W. E. R. Xylander (2019): Bodentierhoch4 – Mit dem Smartphone in den Boden abtauchen. – Natur Forschung Museum 149: 119–122.
Decker, P., A. Allspach, J. Wesenberg & W. E. R. Xylander (2021): BODENTIER hoch 4 – Onlineportal mit App zum Erleben, Erkennen, Erfassen und Erforschen.
FAO, ITPS, GSBI, CBD & EC (2020): State of knowledge of soil biodiversity - Status, challenges and potentialities, Report 2020. – Rome [http://doi.org/10.4060/cb1928en].
Fenoglio, M. S., A. Calviño, E. González, A. Salvo & M. Videla (2021): Urbanisation drivers and underlying mechanisms of terrestrial insect diversity loss in cities. – Ecological Entomology 46: 757–771 [http://doi.org/10.1111/een.13041].
Guerra, C. A., R. D. Bardgett, L. Caon, T. W. Crowther, M. Delgado-Baquerizo, L. Montanarella, L. M. Navarro, B. K. Singh, L. Tedersoo & et al. (2021): Tracking, targeting, and conserving soil biodiversity. – Science 371: 239–241 [http://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd7926].
IPCC (2019): Summary for Policymakers. – In: P. R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. Calvo Buendia, V. Masson-Delmotte, H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts & et al. (eds): Climate change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems.
Jordan, R. C., S. A. Gray, D. V. Howe, W. R. Brooks & J. G. Ehrenfeld (2011): Knowledge gain and behavioral change in citizen-science programs. – Conservation Biology 25: 1148–1154 [http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01745.x].
Kosmala, M., A. Wiggins, A. Swanson & B. Simmons (2016): Assessing data quality in citizen science. – Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14: 551–560 [http://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1436].
Krauss, J., R. Bommarco, M. Guardiola, R. K. Heikkinen, A. Helm, M. Kuussaari, R. Lindborg, E. Öckinger, M. Pärtel, J. Pino, J. Pöyry & et al. (2010): Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time-delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels. – Ecology Letters 13: 597–605 [http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01457.x].
Land-Zandstra, A. M., J. L. A. Devilee, F. Snik, F. Buurmeijer & J. M. Van Den Broek (2016): Citizen science on a smartphone: participants’ motivations and learning. – Public Understanding of Science 25: 45–60 [http://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515602406].
Lotfian, M., J. Ingensand & M. A. Brovelli (2021): The partnership of citizen science and machine learning: Benefits, risks and future challenges for engagement, data collection and data quality. – Sustainability 13: 8087 [http://doi.org/10.3390/su13148087].
Luna, S., M. Gold, A. Albert, L. Ceccaroni, B. Claramunt, O. Danylo, M. Haklay, R. Kottmann, C. Kyba, J. Piera et al. (2018): Developing mobile applications for environmental and biodiversity citizen science: considerations and recommendations. – In: Joly, A., S. Vrochidis, K. Karatzas, A. Karppinen & P. Bonnet (eds): Multimedia Tools and Applications for Environmental & Biodiversity Informatics. – Springer: 9–30.
Mahajan, S., P. Kumar, J. A. Pinto, A. Riccetti, K. Schaaf, G. Camprodon, V. Smari, A. Passani & G. Forino (2020): A citizen science approach for enhancing public understanding of air pollution. – Sustainable Cities and Society 52: 101800 [http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101800].
Mazumdar, S., L. Ceccaroni, J. Piera, F. Hölker, A. J. Berre, R. Arlinghaus & A. Bowser (2018): Citizen Science technologies and new opportunities for participation. – In: Hecker, S., M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel & A. Bonn (eds): Citzen Science. – UCL Press [http://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787352339].
McKinley, D., A. J. Miller-Rushing, H. L. Ballard, R. Bonney, H. Brown, S. Cook-Patton, D. M. Evans, R. A. French, J. K. Parrish, T. B. Phillips & et al. (2017): Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. – Biological Conservation 208: 15–28 [http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.015].
Miller-Rushing, A., R. Primack & R. Bonney (2012): The history of public participation in ecological research. – Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10: 285–290 [http://doi.org/10.1890/110278].
Moczek, N., M. Nuss & J. K. Köhler (2021): Volunteering in the citizen science project “insects of saxony”—the larger the island of knowledge, the longer the bank of questions. – Insects 12: 262 [http://doi.org/10.3390/insects12030262].
Moritz, C. & R. Agudo (2013): The future of species under climate change: Resilience or decline? – Science 341: 504–508 [http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237190].
Moussy, C., I. J. Burfield, P. J. Stephenson, A. F. E. Newton, S. H. M. Butchart, W. J. Sutherland, R. D. Gregory, L. McRae, P. Bubb, I. Roesler & et al. (2022): A quantitative global review of species population monitoring. – Conservation Biology 36: 1–14 [http://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13721].
Mulder, C., A. Boit, M. Bonkowski, P. C. De Ruiter, G. Mancinelli, M. G. A. Van der Heijden, H. J. Van Wijnen, J. A. Vonk & M. Rutgers (2011): A Belowground Perspective on Dutch Agroecosystems: How Soil Organisms Interact to Support Ecosystem Services. – Advances in ecological research 44: 277–358 [http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374794-5.00005-5].
Nov, O., O. Arazy & D. Anderson (2014): Scientists@Home: what drives the quantity and quality of online citizen science participation? – PLoS ONE 9: 1–12 [http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090375].
Nuss, M. (2021): Citizen Science – ein Grundpfeiler für die Erfassung von Biodiversitätsdaten. – In: Ludwig, H., R. Grunewald, A. Bernd & W. Züghart (eds): Citizen Science und Insekten – Welchen Beitrag kann bürgerschaftliches Engagement für das Insektenmonitoring leisten? – Dokumentation des gleichnamigen Workshops. BfN-Skripten 578: 27–33.
Parmesan, C. & G. Yohe (2003): A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. – Nature 421: 37–42 [http://doi.org/10.1038/nature01286].
Pernat, N., H. Kampen, J. M. Jeschke & D. Werner (2021): Citizen science versus professional data collection: comparison of approaches to mosquito monitoring in Germany. – Journal of Applied Ecology 58: 214–223 [http://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13767].
Petersen, T. K., J. D. M. Speed, V. Grøtan & G. Austrheim (2021): Species data for understanding biodiversity dynamics: the what, where and when of species occurrence data collection. – Ecological Solutions and Evidence 2: 1–17 [http://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12048].
Phillips, T. B., H. L. Ballard, B. V. Lewenstein & R. Bonney (2019): Engagement in science through citizen science: moving beyond data collection. – Science Education 103: 665–690 [http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21501].
Pocock, M. J. O., D. S. Chapman & H. E. Roy (2014): Choosing and using Citizen Science, a guide to when and how to use citizen science. – Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.
Pocock, M. J. O., M. Chandler, R. Bonney; I. Thornhill, A. Albin, T. August, S. Bachman, P. M. J. Brown, D. Gasparini, F. Cunha, A. Grez & et al. (2018): A vision for global biodiversity monitoring with citizen science. – Advances in Ecological Research 59: [http://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2018.06.003].
R Core Team (2020): R: A language and environment for statistical computing. – Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing [Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/].
Richter, A., J. Hauck, R. Feldmann, E. Kühn, A. Harpke, N. Hirneisen, A. Mahla, J. Settele & A. Bonn (2018): The social fabric of citizen science—drivers for long-term engagement in the German butterfly monitoring scheme. – Journal of Insect Conservation, 22: 731–743 [http://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-018-0097-1].
Román-Palacios, C. & J. J. Wiens (2020): Recent responses to climate change reveal the drivers of species extinction and survival. – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117: 4211–4217 [http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1913007117].
Rotman, D., J. Hammock, J. Preece, D. Hansen, C. Boston, A. Bowser & Y. He (2014): Motivations affecting initial and long-term participation in citizen science projects in three countries. – iConference 2014 Proceedings [http://doi.org/10.9776/14054].
Silvertown, J. (2009): A new dawn for citizen science. – Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24: 467–471 [http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017].
Tiago, P., A. Ceia-Hasse, T. A. Marques, C. Capinha & H. M. Pereira (2017): Spatial distribution of citizen science casuistic observations for different taxonomic groups. – Scientific Reports 7: 1–9 [http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13130-8].
Troudet, J., P. Grandcolas, A. Blin, R. Vignes-Lebbe & F. Legendre (2017): Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences. – Scientific Reports 7: 9132 [http://doi.org/110.1038/s41598-017-09084-6].
Turbé, A., A. De Toni, P. Benito, P. Lavelle, N. R. Camacho & W. H. Van Der Putten (2010): Soil biodiversity: functions, threats and tools for policy makers [Retrieved from https://hal-bioemco.ccsd.cnrs.fr/bioemco-00560420].
Wall, D. H., U. N. Nielsen & J. Six (2015): Soil biodiversity and human health. – Nature 528: 69–76 [http://doi.org/10.1038/nature15744].
Wiens, J. J. (2016): Climate-Related Local Extinctions Are Already Widespread among Plant and Animal Species. – PLoS Biology 14: 1–18 [http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001104].
Wilson, J. R., Ş. Procheş, B. Braschler, E. S. Dixon & D. M. Richardson (2007): The (bio)diversity of science reflects the interests of society. – Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5: 409–414 [http://doi.org/10.1890/060077.01].
Xylander, W. E. R. (2016): Citizen Science - Potentiale und Grenzen der Einbeziehung von Bürgern in die Forschung. – Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Oberlausitz 24: 103–114.
Xylander, W. (2020): Society´s awareness for protection of soils, its biodiversity and function in 2030 - We need a more intrinsic approach. – Soil Organisms 92: 203–212 [http://doi.org/10.25674/so92iss3pp203].
Zizka, G. (2017): Citizen Science: Revolutionieren Bürger die Wissenschaft? Biologie unserer Zeit 47: 40–45.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles from Senckenberg’s SOIL ORGANISMS Open Access scientific journal that are made available on the Senckenberg website (www.senckenberg.de) and also www.soil-organisms.org may be read, copied, distributed, and (in limited quantity) printed for non-commercial, private, scientific purposes.
In accordance with the German Science Foundation’s „Rules for the Safeguarding of Good Scientific Practice“, references to cited articles are to be complete and correct and furnished with a link to the website of the Senckenberg journal in question.
The Senckenberg Society for Nature Research (Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, SGN) is a member of the Leibniz Association (Leibniz-Gemeinschaft) and is therefore committed to the idea of Open Access as explained in the Berlin Declaration (Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Scientific Knowledge, Berliner Erklärung über den offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen).
Open Access is understood to mean the charge-exempt public access to scientific results via the internet. The users should be able to read, copy, print, search within, and reference the full text without limitation and to use it in any conceivable lawful manner without financial, legal or technical hindrance.
This applies also to the SGN, which publishes various scientific series. Some scientific journals are made available to the public via Open Acess in addition to printed copies.
