Spennemann, Dirk R
Description
This thesis addresses the question of the transformation of the Lapita Culture established on
Tongatapu over the period 1000 BC to AD 500 into the highly stratified society described by European
observers of the late 18th century and reflected in a rich body of oral traditions and a conspicuous
grouping of beachrock slab-faced monuments at a capital centre on the lagoon at Mu’a. It does so in
the light of discussions of the nature and origins of chiefdoms in Polynesia, particularly...[Show more] the
proposition that they arose in the context of increases in populations in circumscribed environments
subject to fluctuations in horticultural production, where horticultural surplus could be appropriated,
accumulated, stored and judiciously redistributed.
The evidence, old and new, for Lapita society is assessed to identify more precisely the nature of the
developments to be examined. Three research objectives are defined to which field research by survey
and excavation was directed. These are the course and chronology of the settlement of the inland areas
and the concomitant growth of an essentially horticulturally-based economy; the nature of the
settlement and habitation pattern represented by earthen house- and burial mounds of post-Lapita,
aceramic times; and the origins and development of slab-built structures as a mark of high status.
The settlement of the inland was accomplished in Late Lapita times, by the 5th century AD, already
in a non-nucleated pattern reminiscent of that described by the early Europeans, and the economy was
horticulturally based. Mound-building, at least for habitation, proved to be equally old, while
comparisons of mound numbers (based on sample surveys) against population estimates (using a variety
of sources) suggest that not everyone could be accommodated on them, implying some level of social
differentiation in their use. Excavations at house mounds adjacent to one of the quarries where the
slabs for high-status structures were obtained indicate that this activity also goes back to the 5th
century AD.
The further development of these early signs of social differentiation cannot be traced, until the
sudden and spectacular appearance of the monument group at Heketa, an early traditional political centre. This is interpreted as representing the establishment of a supreme chieftainship (symbolised
in the Tongan term Tu' z) out of a number of earlier competing chieftainships. Analysis of various
parameters of slab-faced monuments gives insight into the nature and development of the ruling
dynasty and associated lineages. There is the appearance of a significant overseas involvement (the
so-called Tongan Maritime Empire), symbolised by the shift of capital centre to Mu'a on the lagoon and
its equipping with harbour and wharf facilities. There is also evidence of internal tension between
the leading lineages, archaeologically best reflected in the large isolated slab-faced monument at
Kanokupolu in the far west of Tongatapu, which by the time of European arrival had become a political
centre apart from and competitive with Mu'a.
The results of the research point to the possibility of bridging the gap between the first indications
of social differentiation in the 5th century AD on the archaeological evidence and the appearance of
supreme chieftainship at Heketa in the 12th century by genealogical reckoning through investigations
in the Toloa area of southeastern Tongatapu, where the traditions locate the first, shadowy political
centre.
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.