Abstracting and Indexing

  • Google Scholar
  • CrossRef
  • WorldCat
  • ResearchGate
  • Academic Keys
  • DRJI
  • Microsoft Academic
  • Academia.edu
  • OpenAIRE

Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice (KAP) Among Dentists toward Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Shiraz, Iran

Article Information

Hamid Reza Farpour1, Aref Nasir1, Alireza Sadighi1, Kayvon Seyed Dehghanian1, Faisal Ahmed2*, Mohammad Hossein Taghrir1, Ebrahim Al-shami2, Khalil Al-naggar2

1Department of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Ibb University of Medical Sciences, Ibb, Yemen

*Corresponding Author: Faisal Ahmed, Al-Thora Hospital, Ibb University of Medical Sciences.

Received: 07 September 2022; Accepted: 09 September 2023; Published: 27 September 2023

Citation: Hamid Reza Farpour, Aref Nasir, Alireza Sadighi, Kayvon Seyed Dehghanian, Faisal Ahmed, Mohammad Hossein Taghrir, Ebrahim Al-Shami, Khalil Al-Naggar. Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice (KAP) Among Dentists toward Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Shiraz, Iran. Fortune Journal of Rheumatology 5 (2023): 07-16.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook

Abstract

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common workplace musculoskeletal disorder, and dentists are a high-risk group due to their work conditions. This study aims to obtain a full understanding of knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of CTS among Dentists in Shiraz, Iran.

Methods: Between Jun, 2019 and Dec 2019; A researcher-made questionnaire was developed for this cross-sectional pilot study in order to evaluate the KAP of dentists regarding CTS. Participants were recruited to fill out the questionnaire. The participants were recruited using convenient sampling from dentists working. A 51 dentists have completed the survey. Ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained.

Results: About 31 (60.8%) respondents were female and 20(39.2%) were male. 54.9%. of the participants were aged below 33 years. 66.7%. of dentists had less than 10 years of work experience. No statistically significant correlation was observed between age, and number of years of work experience and KAP scores. But there was significant correlation between gender and knowledge (p =0.04). The mean scores of knowledges were 3.7 ±1.3 which was low to average regarding the prevention and treatment of CTS. The mean scores of attitudes and practice were 10.9 ±3.2 and 7.9 ± 2.1, respectively. Which represent a positive attitude and practice towards regarding the prevention and treatment of CTS. There was a significant correlation between attitude and practice among dentists with p =0.001.

Conclusion: Most dentists in this study had low to average knowledge, high attitudes, and high practice scores of the prevention and treatment of CTS.

Keywords

carpal tunnel syndrome; dentist; health knowledge; attitudes; practice

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome articles; Dentist articles; Health Knowledge articles; Attitudes articles; Practice articles

carpal tunnel syndrome articles carpal tunnel syndrome Research articles carpal tunnel syndrome review articles carpal tunnel syndrome PubMed articles carpal tunnel syndrome PubMed Central articles carpal tunnel syndrome 2023 articles carpal tunnel syndrome 2024 articles carpal tunnel syndrome Scopus articles carpal tunnel syndrome impact factor journals carpal tunnel syndrome Scopus journals carpal tunnel syndrome PubMed journals carpal tunnel syndrome medical journals carpal tunnel syndrome free journals carpal tunnel syndrome best journals carpal tunnel syndrome top journals carpal tunnel syndrome free medical journals carpal tunnel syndrome famous journals carpal tunnel syndrome Google Scholar indexed journals dentist articles dentist Research articles dentist review articles dentist PubMed articles dentist PubMed Central articles dentist 2023 articles dentist 2024 articles dentist Scopus articles dentist impact factor journals dentist Scopus journals dentist PubMed journals dentist medical journals dentist free journals dentist best journals dentist top journals dentist free medical journals dentist famous journals dentist Google Scholar indexed journals health knowledge articles health knowledge Research articles health knowledge review articles health knowledge PubMed articles health knowledge PubMed Central articles health knowledge 2023 articles health knowledge 2024 articles health knowledge Scopus articles health knowledge impact factor journals health knowledge Scopus journals health knowledge PubMed journals health knowledge medical journals health knowledge free journals health knowledge best journals health knowledge top journals health knowledge free medical journals health knowledge famous journals health knowledge Google Scholar indexed journals attitudes articles attitudes Research articles attitudes review articles attitudes PubMed articles attitudes PubMed Central articles attitudes 2023 articles attitudes 2024 articles attitudes Scopus articles attitudes impact factor journals attitudes Scopus journals attitudes PubMed journals attitudes medical journals attitudes free journals attitudes best journals attitudes top journals attitudes free medical journals attitudes famous journals attitudes Google Scholar indexed journals practice articles practice Research articles practice review articles practice PubMed articles practice PubMed Central articles practice 2023 articles practice 2024 articles practice Scopus articles practice impact factor journals practice Scopus journals practice PubMed journals practice medical journals practice free journals practice best journals practice top journals practice free medical journals practice famous journals practice Google Scholar indexed journals musculoskeletal disorder articles musculoskeletal disorder Research articles musculoskeletal disorder review articles musculoskeletal disorder PubMed articles musculoskeletal disorder PubMed Central articles musculoskeletal disorder 2023 articles musculoskeletal disorder 2024 articles musculoskeletal disorder Scopus articles musculoskeletal disorder impact factor journals musculoskeletal disorder Scopus journals musculoskeletal disorder PubMed journals musculoskeletal disorder medical journals musculoskeletal disorder free journals musculoskeletal disorder best journals musculoskeletal disorder top journals musculoskeletal disorder free medical journals musculoskeletal disorder famous journals musculoskeletal disorder Google Scholar indexed journals Carpal tunnel syndrome articles Carpal tunnel syndrome Research articles Carpal tunnel syndrome review articles Carpal tunnel syndrome PubMed articles Carpal tunnel syndrome PubMed Central articles Carpal tunnel syndrome 2023 articles Carpal tunnel syndrome 2024 articles Carpal tunnel syndrome Scopus articles Carpal tunnel syndrome impact factor journals Carpal tunnel syndrome Scopus journals Carpal tunnel syndrome PubMed journals Carpal tunnel syndrome medical journals Carpal tunnel syndrome free journals Carpal tunnel syndrome best journals Carpal tunnel syndrome top journals Carpal tunnel syndrome free medical journals Carpal tunnel syndrome famous journals Carpal tunnel syndrome Google Scholar indexed journals hands and wrists articles hands and wrists Research articles hands and wrists review articles hands and wrists PubMed articles hands and wrists PubMed Central articles hands and wrists 2023 articles hands and wrists 2024 articles hands and wrists Scopus articles hands and wrists impact factor journals hands and wrists Scopus journals hands and wrists PubMed journals hands and wrists medical journals hands and wrists free journals hands and wrists best journals hands and wrists top journals hands and wrists free medical journals hands and wrists famous journals hands and wrists Google Scholar indexed journals paresthesia articles paresthesia Research articles paresthesia review articles paresthesia PubMed articles paresthesia PubMed Central articles paresthesia 2023 articles paresthesia 2024 articles paresthesia Scopus articles paresthesia impact factor journals paresthesia Scopus journals paresthesia PubMed journals paresthesia medical journals paresthesia free journals paresthesia best journals paresthesia top journals paresthesia free medical journals paresthesia famous journals paresthesia Google Scholar indexed journals neck pain articles neck pain Research articles neck pain review articles neck pain PubMed articles neck pain PubMed Central articles neck pain 2023 articles neck pain 2024 articles neck pain Scopus articles neck pain impact factor journals neck pain Scopus journals neck pain PubMed journals neck pain medical journals neck pain free journals neck pain best journals neck pain top journals neck pain free medical journals neck pain famous journals neck pain Google Scholar indexed journals

Article Details

1. Introduction

Implementing proper workplace ergonomics creates a safe, productive, and comfortable working environment. Dental health workers have a demanding job that requires strenuous and repetitive movements and frequent use of vibratory tools. Unsuccessful application of ergonomics can lead to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSD); a term referring to MSD that are brought on or exacerbated by risk factors in the workplace [1]. The hands are one of the most affected regions of the body [2]. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common MSD of the hands and wrists.[1] The median nerve along with tendons of nine of the flexor muscles of the digits pass through the space between the flexor retinaculum and the bones of the wrist. If this space, called the carpal tunnel, decreases in diameter or if there’s swelling of the tissues inside this space, the median nerve can become trapped and cause the symptoms of CTS[3]. It is believed that one in every five symptomatic patient has CTS based on clinical examinations and nerve conduction study[4]. The overall prevalence based on physical examinations in the general population in Iran is estimated to be 17.5%; therefore, CTS has a high prevalence in Iran [5]. The most common symptoms include pain, paresthesia, and numbness in the first, second, and third digits along with the radial half of the fourth digit [6]. Some patients also report unusual pain patterns including elbow pain, shoulder pain, and neck pain [7]. Personal factors such as advanced age, female gender, a higher body mass index, and smoking are associated with a higher incidence of CTS. Occupational risk factors include bending and twisting of the hand, working with vibratory tools, and repetitive hand use [8]. CTS occurs more frequently in patients with systemic illnesses such as hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, and rheumatoid arthritis [9]. Diagnosis is made mainly by obtaining a thorough history of the patient and performing physical examinations such as the Phalen’s and Tinel’s tests [10]. Electrodiagnosis is the gold standard for diagnosing and determining the severity of CTS [11]. Treatment is based on disease severity. Mild to moderate cases can benefit from conservative management including splinting, laser therapy and local corticosteroid injections [12]. However, a proportion of those treated conservatively and those with severe or recurrent symptoms will eventually require surgery [13]. Recovery after carpal tunnel release surgery can take up to a year [13]. There are more than 37,000 registered dentists in Iran. Of them, 1,800 are registered in Shiraz, Iran [14]. Sixteen percent of dentists in Iran are diagnosed with CTS by physical examination [14]; a significant burden considering the hours of lost productive work due to the lengthy treatment course of CTS. It is crucial to prevent, rather than treat, CTS. The more informed the dentists are regarding CTS, the more likely they are to have positive attitudes toward modifying risk factors and practicing healthier behaviors in their workplace. The aim of this paper was to lay a foundation for a future larger study to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) of dentists practicing in a populous city in south of Iran regarding CTS. No similar study has been conducted so far. Hopefully, the results of the future main study will guide policymakers to take measures to decrease the burden of CTS on our healthcare workers.

2. Materials & Methods

Study design:

This cross-sectional pilot study was designed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) toward CTS among dentists working in Shiraz, Iran from January to December 2019. A researcher-made questionnaire was developed for this study. The university’s Deputy of Health department provided a list of all medical facilities. By relying on a similar study and choosing a confidence level of 95%, ninety-one samples were recruited by non-randomized convenient sampling from public and private health sectors. Practicing in Shiraz, Iran, and a minimum of three years of work experience were considered as the inclusion criteria. Lack of consent was determined as the criterion of exclusion.

Two members of the research team held a Bachelor of Science in health information technologies and were oriented by the research team and directed to the hospitals to collect data. Data were collected using a demographic form and a research survey.

The questionnaire consisted of 5 parts.

  1. Demographics including age, sex, and work experience.
  2. Medical history such as history of wrist pain, numbness and paresthesia in hands, rheumatic diseases, and endocrine diseases.
  3. Knowledge which included 12 multiple-choice questions.
  4. Attitudes which included 15 multiple-choice questions.
  5. Practice which included 12 multiple-choice questions.

The respondent was offered multiple choices on each question. Each correct response had a score of 1 and any incorrect responses yielded a score of zero. Hence, the possible attainable knowledge scores ranged from zero to 12, the attitudes from zero to 15, and the practice from zero to 12. A semi-structured self-administered questionnaire was used as the study instrument. The questionnaire was adapted from pre-existing templates [15,16]. The face and content validity of the questionnaire was determined by surveying a group of physical medicine and rehabilitation attending physicians. A 4-point Likert scale was used to rate the validity of each item of the questionnaire. The survey inquired about the equivocalness, clarity, simplicity, and relevance of each item to determine the content validity of the questionnaire. For face validity, the survey probed 3 inquires: the likeliness that the respondent would be able to answer the question, the clarity of the choice of words, and the overall style and layout of questionnaire. The test-rest reliability was confirmed by ten subjects from the sample population. The reliability of this questionnaire was also assessed by the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (α = 0.8). Two age groups were defined using the median of the respondents’ ages. The median of age was 33 years. The respondents were divided into 3 groups based on their years of work experience: those with <10 years, those with 10-20 years, and those with >20 years of work experience. To objectively compare the results of the study with similar studies, the KAP scores were divided into three groups using the tertials of the scores of each section as the cutoff. Thus, for the knowledge and practice section, scores ≤3 were considered low, ≥8 high, and 4-7 average. For the attitudes section, scores ≤4 were considered low, ≥10 high, and 5-9 average. The study was approved by the ethics committee. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before filling out the questionnaire. The questionnaires were coded to guarantee anonymity. After filling out the questionnaire, the researcher presented information about the etiology, symptoms, prevention, and treatment of CTS to each respondent. The research team obtained verbal consent for participation and the final response to the questionnaire items was agreed upon to be equivalent to a final consent signature.

Statistical analysis:

Data were analyzed in SPSS software Version 25.0 (Armonk, New York: IBM Corp) using descriptive statistics (mean ± standard deviation and percentage) and inferential statistics (comparing independent groups and analysis of variation). We used Kolmogorov-Smirnov to assess normal distribution of continuous variables; none of the variables followed a normal distribution and were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman’s rank correlation test. A two-tailed p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

51 dentists completed the survey (56% response rate). Most dentists who had not participated in the survey mentioned lack of time or interest as the primary reasons for opting out. 31 (60.8%) respondents were female and 20 (39.2%) were male. Almost one half of the participants were aged below 33 (54.9%) years. The majority of participants (70.6%) had job experience below 10 years. No statistically significant correlation was observed between age, and number of years of work experience and KAP scores. But there was significant correlation was observed between gender and Knowledge score (P-Value=0.04). (Table 1)

Parameter

Knowledge

P-Value

Attitudes

P-Value

Practice (Mean± SD)

P-Value

Gender

Female

(Mean ± SD)

(Mean± SD)

Male

4 ± 1.39

0.04*

10.77 ± 3.68

0.70*

7.97 ± 2.33

0.40*

Age (years)

≥ 33

3.25 ± 1.92

 

11.15 ± 2.28

 

7.80 ± 1.77

 

< 33

3.89 ± 1.71

0.45*

11.18 ± 3.19

0.44*

8.04 ± 1.90

0.89*

Work Experience (years)

≥ 10

3.48 ± 1.56

 

10.61 ± 3.22

 

7.74 ± 2.38

 

11 to 20

3.83 ± 1.72

0.38

11.08 ± 2.92

0.99

8.08 ± 1.90

0.35

< 21

3.70 ± 1.64

 

10.60 ± 3.89

 

7.70 ± 2.98

 
   

2.80 ± 0.84

 

10.40 ± 4.10

 

7.00 ± 1.58

 

* Mann-Whitney U test
† Kruskal-Wallis test

Table 1: Comparisons of means of knowledge, attitudes, and practice scores in different demographic subgroups

Regarding medical history, about 29 (56.9%) of participants experienced wrist pain in the past 6 months. The responses to the medical history of the questionnaire are summarized in Table 2.

Question

Choices

Number of times

n (%)

1. Have you experienced wrist pain in the past 6 months? If yes,

Yes

1

6

specify how many times.

 

(11.8%)

 

2

14

   

(27.5%)

 

3

3

   

(5.9%)

 

4

4

   

(7.8%)

 

5

2

   

(3.9%)

 

Total

29

   

(56.9%)

 

No

 

22

     

(43.1%)

2. Have you ever been absent from work due to wrist pain? If yes, specify how many times.

Yes

1

3

(5.9%)

   

2

2

     

(3.9%)

   

Total

5

     

(9.8%)

 

No

 

46

     

(90.2%)

3. Have you ever left work early due to wrist pain?

Yes

 

3

(5.9%)

 

No

 

48

(94.1%)

4. Have you ever visited a doctor due to wrist pain?

Yes

 

3

(5.9%)

 

No

 

48

(94.1%)

5. Do you suffer from diabetes or other endocrine diseases?

Yes

 

5

(9.8%)

 

No

 

46

(90.2%)

6. Do you suffer from any rheumatologic disease?

Yes

 

1

(2%)

No

 

50

(98%)

7. Have you ever experienced tingling and numbness in your hand during your practice?

Yes

 

29

(90.2%)

 

No

 

22

(43.1%)

8. Have you ever suffered from neck pain during your practice?

Yes

 

41

(80.4%)

 

No

 

10

(19.6%)

Table 2: Results of the medical history section of the questionnaire

Regarding Knowledge, the mean score of the knowledge of the questionnaire was 3.70 ±1.64 with a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 9. 24 (47.1%) dentists had low knowledge, 26 (51%) had average knowledge, and only one (1.9%) had high knowledge regarding CTS. 47(92.2%) dentists were not familiar with the prevention and treatment, including the definitive treatment of this syndrome. (Table 3)

Question

Answered

n (%)

1. Are pain, numbness, and tingling in the thumb, index, and middle fingers symptoms of CTS?

Correctly (YES)

29

-56.90%

Incorrectly (NO)

22

-43.10%

2. Are pain, numbness, and tingling in the ring and little fingers symptoms of CTS?

Incorrectly (YES)

24

-47.10%

Correctly (NO)

27

-47.10%

3. Which nerve is affected in CTS?

Correctly (Median Nerve)

1

-2%

Incorrectly (Ulnar / Radial Nerve)

50

-98%

4. In which region of the upper extremity is the nerve affected?

Correctly (Wrist)

23

-45.10%

Incorrectly (Neck / Elbow)

28

-54.90%

5. Does smoking have an association with CTS?

Correctly (YES)

18

-35.30%

Incorrectly (NO)

33

-64.70%

6. Is diabetes mellitus associated with CTS?

Correctly (YES)

19

-37.30%

Incorrectly (NO)

32

-67.20%

7. Does obesity have an association with CTS?

Correctly (YES)

24

-47.10%

Incorrectly (NO)

27

-52.90%

8. Is repetitive hand use the cause of CTS?

Correctly (YES)

34

-66.70%

Incorrectly (NO)

17

-33.30%

9. Do you know how to prevent CTS?

YES

4

-7.80%

NO

47

-92.20%

10. Are you familiar with the treatment options of CTS?

YES

4

-7.80%

NO

47

-92.20%

11. What is the gold standard for diagnosis of CTS?

Correctly (EMG studies)

5

-9.80%

Incorrectly (Blood test/ Wrist MRI / PE)

46

-90.20%

12. Is surgery the definitive treatment for CTS?

YES

4

-7.80%

NO

47

-92.20%

EMG: Electromyography MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging, PE, Physical examination

Table 3: Results of the knowledge part of the questionnaire.

Regarding Attitudes, the mean score of the attitudes part of the questionnaire was 10.92 ±3.18 with a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 15. 2 (3.9%) respondents had low attitudes, 9 (17.6%) had average attitudes, and 40 (78.4%) had high attitudes toward CTS. The need for ergonomic enhancements was reported by 45 (88.2%) dentists. Although 38(74.5%) dentists stated that CTS was not a serious disease; the same number of dentists believed that significant complications could arise from CTS. Most dentists (72.5%) were aware of the high prevalence of this syndrome. (Table 4)

Questions

Answere

n (%)

1. Can answers to the questions in the knowledge part help you improve your work conditions?

YES

38

-74.50%

NO

13

-25.50%

2. Are you interested in knowing more about CTS?

YES

47

-92.20%

NO

4

-7.80%

3. Can CTS affect your work status?

YES

42

-82.40%

NO

9

-17.60%

4. Are the complications of CTS significant for you?

YES

38

-74.50%

NO

13

-25.50%

5. Do you believe CTS has a low prevalence?

NO

37

-72.50%

YES

14

-27.50%

6. Do you believe certain simple exercises for a few minutes every day can prevent CTS?

YES

43

-84.30%

NO

8

-15.70%

7. Would you be interested in sharing your knowledge of CTS with your colleagues?

YES

41

-80.40%

NO

10

-19.60%

8. Would you visit your doctor if you had symptoms of CTS?

YES

44

-86.30%

NO

7

-13.70%

9. Do you feel the need for ergonomic enhancements in your workplace?

YES

45

-88.20%

NO

6

-11.80%

10. Do you think CTS is a preventable disease?

YES

43

-84.30%

NO

8

-15.70%

11. Do you think CTS can be cured?

YES

28

-54.90%

NO

23

-45.10%

12. Can CTS be managed by splinting?

Correctly (YES)

35

-68.60%

Incorrectly (NO)

16

-31.40%

13. Can regional corticosteroid injections be used in management of CTS?

Correctly (YES)

35

-68.60%

Incorrectly (NO)

16

-31.40%

14. Can nerve conduction velocity testing identify the severity of CTS?

Correctly (YES)

28

-54.90%

Incorrectly (NO)

23

-45.10%

15. Is CTS a serious disease?

YES

13

-25.50%

Table 4: Results of the attitudes part of the questionnaire

Regarding Practice, the mean score of the practice part of the questionnaire was 7.90 ± 2.10 with a minimum of zero and a maximum of 11. 2 (3.9%) participants scored low, 16 (31.3%) scored average, and 33 (64.7%) scored high on the practice part of the questionnaire. 36 (70.6%) dentists were willing to try splinting for management of CTS, but most would forego surgery if they were diagnosed with CTS (86.3%). 45(88.2%) participants stated that they would refrain from working if they experienced symptoms of CTS. (Table 5)

Questions

Answere

n (%)

1. I will take a break from work if I experienced wrist pain

YES

43

-84.30%

NO

8

-15.70%

2. I will try to gain more insight into CTS

YES

43

-84.30%

NO

8

-15.70%

3. I have learned the appropriate exercises to prevent CTS and I perform them regularly

YES

5

-9.80%

NO

46

-90.20%

4. I will visit a doctor the first time I experience wrist pain

YES

36

-70.60%

NO

15

-29.40%

5. I will complete the treatment course even if it lasts for months and my symptoms improve early in the course

YES

32

-62.70%

NO

19

-37.30%

6. I will complete the rehabilitation course if I were diagnosed with CTS

YES

39

-76.50%

NO

12

-23.50%

7. I will try to ergonomically enhance my workplace and use more standard equipment

YES

38

-74.50%

NO

13

-25.50%

8. I will try splinting if prescribed by my doctor

YES

36

-70.60%

NO

15

-29.40%

9. I will not undergo surgery even if my doctor prescribed it. Instead, I will use painkillers

NO

7

-13.70%

YES

44

-86.30%

10. I will educate my friends and colleagues on CTS

YES

43

-84.30%

NO

8

-15.70%

11. I will change my work-hours so I can rest for a few minutes for every hour

YES

36

of work

-70.60%

 

NO

15

 

-29.40%

12. I will refrain from working if I had symptoms of CTS

YES

45

-88.20%

NO

6

-11.80%

Table 5: Results of the practice part of the questionnaire.

Additionally, the spearman's correlation between knowledge, attitude, and practice showed significant correlation between attitude and practice among dentists with p value=0.001. (Table 6).

Parameter

Knowledge

Attitude

Practice

Knowledge

-

0.21

0.81

Attitude

0.21

-

0.001

Practice

0.81

0.001

-

Table 6: Spearman's correlation among knowledge, Attitude, and practice among dentists.

Discussion

Our results show that dentists in our study have low to average knowledge, high attitudes, and high practice scores regarding CTS. A study on 223 doctors regarding prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) found that doctors had high knowledge, high attitudes, and average practice regarding this subject [17]. Compared to dentists in our study, the higher knowledge scores of doctors are probably the result of their extensive education on MSD in medical school and in the form of continuing medical education (CME). Although both doctors and dentists have high attitudes, it seems that dentists’ positive attitudes lead to practicing healthier principles. Proper ergonomics are one of the most important factors in preventing CTS in dental health workers [18]. The KAP of 250 dental professionals regarding ergonomics during routine dental procedures were assessed in another paper [19]. The study showed that dental professionals, including undergraduates and private dental practitioners, had average KAP toward the subject. The author postulated that the slightly higher scores on practice compared to knowledge were due to informal training and self-learned optimal principles during practice. The same might be true for our study population. We found that dentists have high practice but low to average knowledge scores. We assume that while dentists had limited formal education on the subject of CTS in their dental school curriculum, they might have frequently experienced symptoms of CTS during their practice and had learned over time to adhere to techniques that alleviated the symptoms such as taking a break from work.

A survey of 55 dentists showed that participants lacked the positive attitudes and behavior to seek medical expert advice for prevention of work-related MSD in the initial stages [20]. On the contrary, we found that dentists have high attitudes and practice scores regarding CTS and its prevention. Moreover, most dentists stated that they would visit their doctor the first time they experienced wrist pain. Hopefully, in the future, this will increase the number of diagnosed cases of CTS and help alleviate a common complaint among dental professionals and increase their work efficacy. We found that the majority of dentists were aware of the fact that CTS is a preventable disease and that doing certain exercises of the hands for a few minutes every day can prevent CTS. A study of 169 workers at an electrical parts manufacturing company in South Korea evaluated the KAP of workers regarding MSD before and after a preventive exercise program and concluded that the educational program significantly increased the KAP of workers [21]. Unfortunately, most participants in our study were not familiar with the appropriate exercises for the prevention of CTS and, therefore, were not exercising their hands regularly. Therefore, educational workshops or courses might prove useful, especially in increasing the knowledge about prevention of work-related MSD such as CTS among dentists. As mentioned earlier, some patients will eventually require surgery for proper management of their symptoms; however, the majority of respondents stated that they would opt for conservative managements and forego surgery if they were diagnosed with CTS. Similarly, in a study of 77 patients with mild to moderately severe CTS, many chose not to be referred to a hand center for carpal tunnel release surgery [22]. The reason why patients delay consideration of surgery might be the risk of unemployment. Studies show that patients normally return to work 2 to 7 weeks after carpal tunnel release surgery [23,24]; while those with severe symptoms may take up to a year to recover.[13] To conclude, CTS can be a life-changing and serious illness since 55% of ill-health retirements in dental practitioners are due to MSD [25]. The results of our study show that dentists have low to average knowledge, high attitudes, and high practice scores regarding CTS. We believe that the results of our study can be of importance in advancing the occupational health and productivity of dentists by providing a basis for a future main study. Our paper has some drawbacks. First, the response rate was below average. Second, as this was a pilot study, the inferential statistics (p-values) might not accurately represent the population of dentists in Shiraz, Iran. The future main study should be done with a larger sample size and with random samples from multiple cities to accurately represent the population of dentists in Iran.

Conclusion

Most dentists in this study had low to average knowledge, high attitudes, and high practice scores of the prevention and treatment of CTS.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran and also Center for Development of Clinical Research of Nemazee Hospital and Dr. Nasrin Shokrpour for editorial assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Funding

Non

Ethical Approvement:

This manuscript was extracted from the MD thesis (NO. 17639) of Alireza Sadighi that was approved and granted by the vice-chancellor of research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran with ethics code of IR.SUMS.MED.REC.1398.546.

References

  1. Gupta A, Bhat M, Mohammed T, et al. Ergonomics in dentistry.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 7 (2014): 30-34.
  2. Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Ferriero G, et al. [Work-related musculoskeletal diseases in dental professionals. 1. Prevalence and risk factors].G Ital Med Lav Ergon 27 (2005): 165-169.
  3. Chammas M, Boretto J, Burmann LM, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome - Part I (anatomy, physiology, etiology and diagnosis).Rev Bras Ortop 49 (2014): 429-436.
  4. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, e al. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population.Jama 282 (1999): 153-158.
  5. Moosazadeh M, Asadi-Aliabadi M, Rostami F, et al. Prevalence of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 28 (2018): 144-153.
  6. Stevens JC, Smith BE, Weaver AL, et al. Symptoms of 100 patients with electromyographically verified carpal tunnel syndrome.Muscle Nerve 22 (1999): 1448-1456.
  7. Harris-Adamson C, Eisen EA, Dale AM, et al. Personal and workplace psychosocial risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome: a pooled study cohort.Occup Environ Med 70 (2013): 529-537.
  8. Maghsoudipour M, Moghimi S, Dehghaan F, et al. Association of occupational and non- occupational risk factors with the prevalence of work related carpal tunnel syndrome.J Occup Rehabil 18 (2008): 152-156.
  9. Shiri R. Hypothyroidism and carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis.Muscle Nerve 50 (2014): 879-883.
  10. Simsir Atalay N, Sarsan A, Akkaya N, et al. The Impact of Disease Severity in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome on Grip Strength, Pinch Strength, Fine Motor Skill and Depression.J Phys Ther Sci 23 (2011): 115-118.
  11. Graham B. The value added by electrodiagnostic testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 (2008): 2587-2593.
  12. Atroshi I, Flondell M, Hofer M, et al. Methylprednisolone injections for the carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Ann Intern Med 159 (2013): 309-317.
  13. Wipperman J, Goerl K. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Diagnosis and Management.Am Fam Physician 94 (2016): 993-999.
  14. Haghighat A, Khosrawi S, Kelishadi A, et al. Prevalence of clinical findings of carpal tunnel syndrome in Isfahanian dentists.Adv Biomed Res 1 (2012): 13.
  15. Kaewboonchoo O, Yamamoto H, Miyai N, et al. The Standardized Nordic Questionnaire Applied to Workers Exposed to Hand-Arm Vibration 40 (1998): 218-222.
  16. Kumar PM, Sahitya S, Penmetsa GS, et al. Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice related to ergonomics among the students of three different dental schools in India: An original research.J Educ Health Promot 9 (2020): 266.
  17. Ephraim-Emmanuel BC, Ogbomade R, Idumesaro BN, et al. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Preventing the Occurrence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Doctors in University of Port-Harcourt Teaching Hospital.J Med Res Innov 3 (2019): 000161.
  18. Sarkar PA, Shigli AL. Ergonomics in general dental practice. People’s J Sci Res 5 (2012): 56-60.
  19. Kalghatgi S, Prasad KV, Chhabra KG, et al. Insights into ergonomics among dental professionals of a dental institute and private practitioners in hubli-dharwad twin cities, India.Saf Health Work 5 (2014): 181-185.
  20. Karibasappa G, Sujatha A, Rajeshwari K. Dentists’ knowledge, attitude and behavior towards the dental ergonomics.IOSR J Dent Med Sci 13 (2014): 86-89.
  21. Koo J-W, Kim K-Y. The change of knowledge, attitude and practice on musculoskeletal diseases after exercise program in an electronic parts manufacturing company. Int Congr Ser 1294 (2006): 143-146.
  22. Burke FD, Storey PA, Wilgis EF. In justification of nonsurgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome.J Hand Surg Am 34 (2009): 1360-1361.
  23. Bekkelund SI, Pierre-Jerome C, Torbergsen T, et al. Impact of occupational variables in carpal tunnel syndrome.Acta Neurol Scand 103 (2001): 193-197.
  24. Mallick A, Clarke M, Wilson S, et al. Reducing the economic impact of carpal tunnel surgery.J Hand Surg Eur 34 (2009): 679-681.
  25. Brown J, Burke FJ, Macdonald EB, et al. Dental practitioners and ill health retirement: causes, outcomes and re-employment.Br Dent J 209 (2010): 7.

Journal Statistics

Impact Factor: * 1.7

CiteScore: 2.9

Acceptance Rate: 11.01%

Time to first decision: 10.4 days

Time from article received to acceptance: 2-3 weeks

Discover More: Recent Articles

© 2016-2024, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved!