Abstracting and Indexing

  • PubMed NLM
  • Google Scholar
  • CrossRef
  • WorldCat
  • ResearchGate
  • Academic Keys
  • DRJI
  • Microsoft Academic
  • Academia.edu
  • OpenAIRE

Maternal and Fetal Outcome of Burn with Pregnancy: A Prospective Observational Study at a Tertiary Burn Hospital

Article Information

Sayeqa Nasreen Khondker1*, S M Mohiuddin2, Rayhana Awwal3

1Assistant Professor (Burn and Plastic Surgery), Sir Salimullah Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh

2Professor (Plastic Surgery), Sheikh Hasina National Institute of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Dhaka, Bangladesh

3Assistant Professor (Endocrinology), Sir Salimullah Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh

*Corresponding author: Sayeqa Nasreen Khondker1*, S M Mohiuddin>2, Rayhana Awwal3

Received: 30 November 2021; Accepted: 07 December 2021; Published: 15 December 2021

Citation: Sayeqa Nasreen Khondker, S M Mohiuddin, Rayhana Awwal. Maternal and Fetal Outcome of Burn with Pregnancy: A Prospective Observational Study at a Tertiary Burn Hospital. Journal of Surgery and Research 4 (2021): 765-777.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook

Abstract

Background

Burns with pregnancy is a potentially life-threatening scenario as it may lead to rapid depletion of the already diminished maternal reserves and have adverse effects on maternal and fetal outcome. Limited studies and controversy between results of different studies needs more studies to be performed to clearly define the protocols that should be followed when a pregnant woman is admitted in a hospital with burns.

Materials and methods

A prospective type of observational study was carried out on 30 burn patients with pregnancy admitted in Department of Plastic Surgery and Burn Unit, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka for a period of 12 (twelve) months to find out maternal & fetal outcome and to determine factors influencing outcome. All patients were managed using standard burn management protocol in consultation with obstetrician. Regular monitoring was done and the outcome was recorded.

Result

Mean TBSA burn was 26.23 ± 13.93 %. 17 (56.7%) patients went back home alive and 13 (43.3%) died. 17(56.7%) fetus survived but 13 (43.3%) fetal death occurred. Maternal and fetal mortality was proportional to the TBSA burn. Maternal and fetal death in patients with burn shock and inhalation injury was 100% and 75% respectively. Death were due to septicemia [n=6(20.0%)], MODS [n=5(16.7%)], ARDS [n=1(3.3%)] and DCM [n=1(3.3%)]. Mean period of wound healing was 30.64 ± 14.02 days and the mean duration of hospital stay was 22.60 ± 18.26 days.

Conclusion

Early Hospitalization, prompt and aggressive fluid management, proper management of suspected inhalation injury and early identification and management of infection and sepsis by appropriate antibiotic which are safe for fetus can reduce both maternal and fetal death. Best care is possible using a multidisciplinary team approach with active participatio

Keywords

Burns with Pregnancy, Maternal Outcome, Fetal Outcome, TBSA Burn

Burns with Pregnancy articles; Maternal Outcome articles; Fetal Outcome articles; TBSA Burn articles

Burns with Pregnancy articles Burns with Pregnancy Research articles Burns with Pregnancy review articles Burns with Pregnancy PubMed articles Burns with Pregnancy PubMed Central articles Burns with Pregnancy 2023 articles Burns with Pregnancy 2024 articles Burns with Pregnancy Scopus articles Burns with Pregnancy impact factor journals Burns with Pregnancy Scopus journals Burns with Pregnancy PubMed journals Burns with Pregnancy medical journals Burns with Pregnancy free journals Burns with Pregnancy best journals Burns with Pregnancy top journals Burns with Pregnancy free medical journals Burns with Pregnancy famous journals Burns with Pregnancy Google Scholar indexed journals Maternal Outcome articles Maternal Outcome Research articles Maternal Outcome review articles Maternal Outcome PubMed articles Maternal Outcome PubMed Central articles Maternal Outcome 2023 articles Maternal Outcome 2024 articles Maternal Outcome Scopus articles Maternal Outcome impact factor journals Maternal Outcome Scopus journals Maternal Outcome PubMed journals Maternal Outcome medical journals Maternal Outcome free journals Maternal Outcome best journals Maternal Outcome top journals Maternal Outcome free medical journals Maternal Outcome famous journals Maternal Outcome Google Scholar indexed journals Fetal Outcome articles Fetal Outcome Research articles Fetal Outcome review articles Fetal Outcome PubMed articles Fetal Outcome PubMed Central articles Fetal Outcome 2023 articles Fetal Outcome 2024 articles Fetal Outcome Scopus articles Fetal Outcome impact factor journals Fetal Outcome Scopus journals Fetal Outcome PubMed journals Fetal Outcome medical journals Fetal Outcome free journals Fetal Outcome best journals Fetal Outcome top journals Fetal Outcome free medical journals Fetal Outcome famous journals Fetal Outcome Google Scholar indexed journals TBSA Burn articles TBSA Burn Research articles TBSA Burn review articles TBSA Burn PubMed articles TBSA Burn PubMed Central articles TBSA Burn 2023 articles TBSA Burn 2024 articles TBSA Burn Scopus articles TBSA Burn impact factor journals TBSA Burn Scopus journals TBSA Burn PubMed journals TBSA Burn medical journals TBSA Burn free journals TBSA Burn best journals TBSA Burn top journals TBSA Burn free medical journals TBSA Burn famous journals TBSA Burn Google Scholar indexed journals Neonatologist articles Neonatologist Research articles Neonatologist review articles Neonatologist PubMed articles Neonatologist PubMed Central articles Neonatologist 2023 articles Neonatologist 2024 articles Neonatologist Scopus articles Neonatologist impact factor journals Neonatologist Scopus journals Neonatologist PubMed journals Neonatologist medical journals Neonatologist free journals Neonatologist best journals Neonatologist top journals Neonatologist free medical journals Neonatologist famous journals Neonatologist Google Scholar indexed journals Plastic Surgery articles Plastic Surgery Research articles Plastic Surgery review articles Plastic Surgery PubMed articles Plastic Surgery PubMed Central articles Plastic Surgery 2023 articles Plastic Surgery 2024 articles Plastic Surgery Scopus articles Plastic Surgery impact factor journals Plastic Surgery Scopus journals Plastic Surgery PubMed journals Plastic Surgery medical journals Plastic Surgery free journals Plastic Surgery best journals Plastic Surgery top journals Plastic Surgery free medical journals Plastic Surgery famous journals Plastic Surgery Google Scholar indexed journals septicemia  articles septicemia  Research articles septicemia  review articles septicemia  PubMed articles septicemia  PubMed Central articles septicemia  2023 articles septicemia  2024 articles septicemia  Scopus articles septicemia  impact factor journals septicemia  Scopus journals septicemia  PubMed journals septicemia  medical journals septicemia  free journals septicemia  best journals septicemia  top journals septicemia  free medical journals septicemia  famous journals septicemia  Google Scholar indexed journals critical Inhalation injury  articles critical Inhalation injury  Research articles critical Inhalation injury  review articles critical Inhalation injury  PubMed articles critical Inhalation injury  PubMed Central articles critical Inhalation injury  2023 articles critical Inhalation injury  2024 articles critical Inhalation injury  Scopus articles critical Inhalation injury  impact factor journals critical Inhalation injury  Scopus journals critical Inhalation injury  PubMed journals critical Inhalation injury  medical journals critical Inhalation injury  free journals critical Inhalation injury  best journals critical Inhalation injury  top journals critical Inhalation injury  free medical journals critical Inhalation injury  famous journals critical Inhalation injury  Google Scholar indexed journals

Article Details

1. Introduction

Burn with pregnancy is not a topic frequently mentioned in books on burn care or obstetric texts [1-3]. Despite the relatively high incidence of burns in the developing countries and its importance in pregnancy, there are only a few reports, which have studied different aspects of this problem. Burns occurring in conjunction with pregnancy can be a potentially life threatening scenario as it may lead to a rapid depletion of the already diminished maternal reserves [4] and have adverse effects on maternal and fetal outcome with high incidence of intrauterine fetal death, spontaneous abortion, and premature labor. Pregnancy itself doesn’t alter the maternal survival [5]. The factors which play an effective role on the survival of the mother & the fetus are total body surface area (TBSA) Burn, the depth of the wound, gestational age, complications of the burn, associated injuries & medical diseases [6]. The management protocol in a pregnant burn female has to be tailored, taking into consideration the additional factor of fetal well-being and the fetal susceptibility to various agents [4]. Management requires multidisciplinary approach, including Plastic surgeons, Obstetricians, Radiologist, Anaesthesiolgist, Neonatologist, Dietitian, Physiotherapist and Psychiatrist with close monitoring of maternal and fetal wellbeing [7-9]. With well planned & proper management, the prognosis can be improved [6]. Pregnancy and burns occurring together are not an uncommon scenario with rates highest in the developing world [10,11]. Bangladesh is not also an exception. Previous studies have been controversial regarding the outcome of burns between pregnant and non-pregnant patients; some have concluded that pregnancy does not increase the maternal mortality rate in burn patients while some others have drawn opposite results [5,12-15]. This controversy needs more studies to be performed to clearly define the protocols that should be followed when a pregnant woman is admitted to a hospital with burns. More information is required to provide guidelines for plastic surgeons and obstetricians, regarding counseling the patients and her family for any additional risk of abortion, stillbirth, premature delivery, impaired fetal growth or malformations. In this study, an attempt was made to determine the factors influencing maternal and fetal outcome in order to plan interventions to lower the morbidity and mortality. The aims and objectives of the study was to assess maternal& fetal outcome of burn with pregnancy, to identify factors responsible for maternal and fetal outcome of burn with pregnancy, to determine the relationship outcome of burn with pregnancy with aetiology of burn, total burn surface area, duration of pregnancy, burn related complication like inhalation injury, hypovolemic shock, Infection, septicaemia and to assess burn wound outcome.

2. Materials and Methods

This was a prospective type of observational study performed on female patients admitted with Burn with pregnancy at Department of Plastic Surgery and Burn unit, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Study period was one year extended from July, 2016 to June, 2017. Sample size was 30 using purposive non-random sampling technique. All admitted patients having burn with live pregnancy was included in the study and epidermal burn and burn with other severe co-morbidities were excluded from the study group. All patients were informed about the study. Then those patients willing to take part in the study were included. Diagnosis of pregnancy was made by history and examination and confirmed by patient’s previous medical and obstetric records and by abdominal ultrasound. As a routine protocol, obstetric consultation was sought promptly on admission for each pregnant patient. All pregnant patients was managed in the high dependency unit by the medical and surgical services including surgical dressings in consultation with the obstetrical service. In all patients the extent of burn was calculated by using Lund and Browder’s chart. A burn less than 10% in total body surface area (TBSA) was considered as minor burn. A major burn was defined as a partial or full thickness burn affecting more than 10% TBSA with 10-19% being graded as moderately severe, 20-50% as severe and more than 50% as critical. Inhalation injury was excluded. In late presentation complication of burn like burn shock, infection and septicemia were excluded.

Burn management

Initial resuscitation and burn management were done by standard protocol. No protocol has yet been established for management of pregnant women with burn in this department. All patient received appropriate burn care, including fluid resuscitation, wound care and nutritional support. Fluid resuscitation was done using Parkland’s Formula. Additional 5% fluid was added if burn involved lower abdomen. Targeted urine output was 30-60 ml/hour. Maintained systolic BP>110 mm hg. Central line used in >20% burn. Nutritional support included daily intake of protein and calories according to the basal energy expenditure. After 24 hour Serum albumin done to maintain >3gm /l. Patients were treated with systemic antibiotics not harmful for baby when indicated. Wound swab for culture /sensitivity were done on 5th day/10th day/15day. Those patients who showed growth of organism were treated accordingly. In cases where bronchopneumonia developed, fetal-safe antibiotic were preferred. Every case was treated as individual.

Wound management

Wound management include hydrotherapy, fasciotomy, escharotomy, desloughing, escharectomies, debridement or wound excision and skin grafting. None of the patients underwent early excision and skin grafting. STSG for the wound was deferred till delivery of the baby in most of the cases.

Obstetric management

Obstetric management depended on gestational period, burn severity, and fetal viability. After initial management Ultra-sonogram was done for identifying fetal wellbeing and for confirmation of gestational age. Patients were then referred to Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of DMCH for obstetric management. The management protocol was recommend in this Centre is shown in (Table 1).

Total % burn

Age of gestation

Management

< 30

First trimester

 

No obstetric interference

Second trimester

 

No obstetric interference

Third trimester

More than 36 wks

Induce labour / caesarian section

Less than 36 wks

Conservative approach and monitoring of heart rate

30-50

First trimester

 

Fetal monitoring by ultrasound 3-4 wks

Second trimester

 

Fetal monitoring every 3-4 wks. Tocolytic therapy

Third trimester

More than 36 wks

Deliver fetus within 48 h

Less than 36 wks

Careful fetal monitoring

50-70

First trimester

 

Terminate pregnancy

Second trimester

 

Terminate pregnancy

Third trimester

If baby is viable

Induce labour / caesarian section within 24h

Intrauterine death

No active intervention up to 4 wks / monitoring of foetus of haemocoagulation factors

> 70

First trimester

 

No treatment

Second trimester

 

No treatment

Third trimester

 

Caesarian section as an emergency procedure at the earliest

Table 1: Obstetric management protocol according to gestational age.

Data were collected using a pre-designed data collection sheet. All information regarding history of illness, clinical examination, investigation results and follow-up were recorded in that data collection sheet (questionnaire). All data were compiled in a master table first. Computer based statistical analysis were carried out with appropriate techniques and systems. Quantitative data were expressed as mean and standard deviation, and qualitative data were expressed as frequency distribution and percentage. Statistical analysis was performed by using window based computer software devised with SPSS for Windows version 22. The summarized data were interpreted accordingly and were then presented in the form of tables.

3. Results

Total 42068 patient attended at Plastic Surgery and Burn Unit, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka at OPD and emergency department in one year. 38131 patient attended with burn. Total female patient was 10442. Number of female burn patient was 9344. 954 female burn patients were in childbearing age (15-45) [10.20%of all female burn patient]. Total 30 patients (3.1% of female burn patient of childbearing age), having burn with Pregnancy were included in this study fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among 30 patients, 11 (36.7%) patients were in age group 16-20 years followed by 10 (33.3%) in age group 21-25 years,7 (23.3%)in age group 26-30and 1 (3.3%) patient each was in age group 31-35 years and 41-45 years group. No patient was in 35-40 year group. Age range was 16-45years. Mean age was 23.76±6.04 (Table 2).

Age (years)

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

16 - 20

11

36.7

21 - 25

10

33.3

26 - 30

7

23.3

31 - 35

1

3.3

35 - 40

0

0

41 - 45

1

3.3

Total

30

100

Mean ± SD

23.76 ± 6.04

 

Range (min-max)

16 - 45

 

Table 2: Distribution of patients according to age (n=30)

Burn type

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Flame

28

93.3

scald

0

0

Chemical

1

3.3

Electric

1

3.3

Total

30

100

Table 3: Distribution of patients according to cause of burn (n=30)

Mode of burn

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Accidental

29

96.7

Suicidal

1

3.3

Total

30

100

Table 4: Distribution of patients according to mode of burn (n=30)

Gestational age distribution shows 2 patients (6.7%) were in first trimester of pregnancy, 13(43.3%) in Second trimester and 15(50%) patients were in third trimester of pregnancy (Table 5). Maternal and fetal outcome was noted. Among 30 patients, 17 (56.7%) were survived after treatment and 13 (43.3%) patients died. The cause of death were septicemia and MODS in maximum cases (Table 6). Fetal outcome shows, 17(56.7%) fetus were survived. Of them 8 pregnancy continued till discharge, 9 babies were delivered during treatment period (7 by normal vaginal delivery, 2 by caesarian section). 13 (43.3%) fetal death occurred. Among them 5 fetus died with maternal death, 2 intrauterine death follower by normal delivery and 1 still birth occurred (Table 7). In 2 cases, the mother died after the fetus were delivered by normal vaginal delivery and 2 mothers survived after abortion of the fetus. Relationship between gestational age with maternal and fetal outcome was assessed. Maximum maternal (69.2%) and fetal (76.9%) mortality was observed among the mother in 2nd trimester. According to Chi-Square test maternal death is significantly related with increasing gestational age but fetal death is not influenced by gestational age (Table 8). According to Chi-Square test maternal anaemia was not statistically significantly related with maternal and fetal mortality (Table 9).

Gestational age

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

First trimester

2

6.7

Second trimester

13

43.3

Third trimester

15

50

Total

30

100

Table 5: Distribution of patients according to gestational age (n=30)

Maternal outcome

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Alive

17

56.7

Dead

13

43.3

Causes of death

   

Septicemia

6

20

MODS

5

16.7

ARDS

1

3.3

DCM

1

3.3

Table 6: Distribution of patients according to maternal outcome (n=30)

 

Fetal outcome

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Alive fetus (n=17, 56.7%)

Continued pregnancy

8

26.7

NVD

7

23.3

LUCS

2

6.7

Dead fetus

Maternal death

5

16.7

(n=13, 43.3%)

Abortion

5

16.7

 

IUD

2

6.7

 

Still birth

1

3.3

Total 30

 

30

100

Table 7: Distribution of patients according to fetal outcome (n=30)

Gestational age

n (%)

Maternal outcome

Fetal outcome

Dead

Alive

Dead

Alive

(n=13)

(n=17)

(n=13)

(n=17)

1st trimester

2 (6.7)

0 (0.0)

2 (11.8)

1 (7.7)

1 (5.9)

2nd trimester

13 (43.3)

9 (69.2)

4 (23.5)

10 (76.9)

3 (17.6)

3rd trimester

15 (50.0)

4 (30.8)

11 (64.7)

2 (15.4)

13 (76.5)

P value(<0.01)

 

0.034 NS

 

0.003 S

 

Table 8: Relationship of gestational age with maternal and fetal outcome

Anaemia

n (%)

Maternal outcome

Fetal outcome

Dead

Alive

Dead

Alive

(n=13)

(n=17)

(n=13)

(n=17)

Present

19 (63.3)

10 (76.9)

9 (52.9)

10 (76.9)

9 (52.9)

Absent

11 (36.7)

3 (23.1)

8 (47.1)

3 (23.1)

8 (47.1)

p-value(<0.01)

 

0.177 NS

 

0.177 NS

 

Table 9: Relationship between Maternal anaemia with maternal outcome (n=30).

There is significant relationship between percentage of burn with maternal and fetal mortality. Maximum maternal and fetal death was observed among the patient with burn involving >40% TBSA. It was observed that higher the TBSA higher the maternal and fetal death. There was significant difference in TBSA between dead and alive mother & fetus. Mean TBSA% was significantly high among the mother who died (40.30 ± 20.39%) comparing the live mother (15.47 ± 8.41%)[p-value-<0.001]. Mean TBSA% was significantly high among the mother whose fetus died (38.53 ± 21.80%) comparing the mother with live fetus (16.82 ± 9.65%) [p-value-<0.001]. According to Chi-Square test there is significant relationship between percentage of burn with maternal and fetal mortality (Table 10). Inhalation injury was present in 6 patients 5 of them died. Five fetal death occurred in mother with inhalation injury. According to Chi-Square test Inhalation injury significantly influence maternal and fetal outcome (Table 11). All patients presented lately with burn shock and septicemia died. According to Chi-Square test burn related complications on admission are significantly related with maternal and fetal mortality.

TBSA (%)

n (%)

Maternal outcome

Fetal outcome

Dead

Alive

Dead

Alive

<15

8 (26.7)

0 (0.0)

8 (47.1)

1 (12.5)

7 (41.3)

15 - 30

13 (43.3)

5 (38.5)

8 (47.1)

4 (30.8)

9 (52.9)

31 - 40

5 (16.7)

4 (80.0)

1 (5.8)

4 (80.0)

1 (5.8)

>40

4 (13.3)

4 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

4 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

Total

30 (100.0)

13 (43.3)

17(43.3)

13 (43.3)

17 (43.3)

p-value (0.01)

 

0.003 S

 

0.008 S

 

Table 10: Relationship between TBSA%, maternal and fetal outcome (n=30)

Inhalation

n (%)

Maternal outcome

Fetal outcome

Dead

Alive

Dead

Alive

(n=13)

(n=17)

(n=13)

(n=17)

Present

6 (20.0)

5 (38.5)

1 (5.9)

5 (38.5)

1 (5.9)

Absent

24 (80.0)

8 (61.5)

16(94.1)

8 (61.5)

16(94.1)

P-value

 

0.027S

0.027S

Table 11: Relationship between presence or absence of Inhalation injury with maternal and fetal outcome (n=30)

Burn complications

n (%)

Maternal outcome

Fetal outcome

 

 

Dead (n=13)

Alive (n=17)

Dead (n=13)

Alive (n=17)

Burn shock

6 (20.0)

6 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

6 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

Infection

7 (26.7)

0 (0.0)

7 (41.2)

1 (14.3)

6 (35.3)

0.001 S

Septicemia

1 (3.3)

1 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

 

p-value(<0.01)

 

0.001

0.002

Table 12: Distribution of patients according to burn related complications on late admission and their relationship with maternal and fetal outcome.

Distribution of patients according to surgical intervention for burn wound management was assessed in Table13. Among 17 survived patient 6 patient had split thickness skin grafting and one patient needed flap for coverage of wound. 10 patients were discharged with no surgical intervention. Wound healing period ranged from 14 to 66 days. Mean period of wound healing was 30.64 ± 14.02 days and the mean duration of hospital stay was 22.60 ± 18.26 days.

Operation

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

STSG

6

35.3

Flap

1

5.9

None

10

58.8

Total

17

100

Table 13: Distribution of patients according to reconstruction done (n=17)

4. Discussion

This incidence of burn with pregnancy is almost similar to other study in same institution [13]. In the other study 49 patients were admitted in Indian tertiary level hospital in five years [14]. Another study was showed 48 burn injured pregnant women admitted in 13 years period time [17]. This incidence rate may be underestimated because a pregnancy test is not routinely done in burned women of reproductive age. Distribution of study subjects by age group is similar to study in the same center in 2014 [13], where Majority of the patient of 2nd decade, and an Indian study where mean age was 23.08 years [14]. A study in Iran, [15] also had similar result. Distribution of patients according to education level was recorded. Maximum patients 24 were educated below SSC, 5 patients had studied up to higher secondary level and only one patient was graduate. Low educated patients have minimum awareness about safety measures against burn, poor knowledge about health care during pregnancy and primary management of burn wound which may contribute to increase incidence and extent of burn and may lead to poor outcome of burn injury. Out of total 30 patients, 27(90%) patients were housewives. 28 patients (93.3%) suffered from flame burn. 0nly one patient had chemical burn and one had electric burn. This result is similar to study in the same centre in 2014 [13], where 93.33% patients had flame burn and rest of them had scald burn.

Similar result was also demonstrated in studies conducted in India [4,14], Iran [15] and Iraq [18]. All burn cases were accidental in nature except one which was suicidal. This result is similar to maximum studies [4,13]. This is probably because of increasing familial stress due to day to day problems like, cooking with an open unguarded fire, rearing of smaller children, overburdened household activities and living in an overcrowded space with minimal amenities inviting frequent accidents. But there is increased incidence of suicidal burn in pregnancy in Iran [15]. More common prevalent factors were poverty, familial conflicts a quarrel with one of the family members, a relative and/or a friend and addiction [15,19,20]. In every case of burn whatever explanation be given by the relative/victim; a thorough investigation must be conducted by Investigating officer or magistrate, to provide proper history to the Medico legal Expert, and help him to pick up slightest clue available & decide whether the case is accidental/suicidal/homicidal [21].

The treating physician whom the patient rely most and share the incidental facts can also help in this matter. Gestational age was recorded. Maximum 15(50%) patients were in third trimester, followed by 13(43.3%) in Second trimester only 2 patients (6.7%) were in first trimester of pregnancy. A previous study in same burn unit shows 50% women were in 3rd trimester, 33% women were in 2nd trimester and 17% were in 1st trimester [13].

A retrospective study in India from 1998 to 2003 including 49 patients showed, gestational age at the time of injury varied from 8 weeks to 34 weeks with 11 cases in first trimester, 21 in second trimester and 17 patients in last trimester [14]. A prospective study of 60 cases at Al kindy general teaching hospital Baghdad-Iraq showed, 16 cases (26.6%) were in the first trimester, sixteen cases (26.6%) in the second and twenty eight cases (46.6%) in the third trimester [18]. In this study TBSA of the burned pregnant women ranged from 1-95%, mean TBSA was 26.23±13.93 %.The majority of burns fell within 15%-30%. In other study TBSA of the burned pregnant women ranged from 10%-72% and the majority of burns ranged between 20%-30% [13]. In an Indian study the percentage of TBSA varied from 8 % to 100% (mean 71.47%) [14]. Maternal and fetal outcome was recorded. Among thirty study subjects, 17 (56.7%) patients went home alive.13 (43.3%) patients died. 6 patients died due to septicemia which was 20.0% of total death.

The next cause of death was due to MODS [n=5(16.7%)], 1 patient died due to ARDS (3.3%) and 1(3.3%) due to DCM due to severe anaemia following postpartum haemorrhage. 17(56.7%) fetus were survived. Of them 8 pregnancy continued till discharge, 9 babies were delivered during treatment period (7NVD, 2LUCS). 13 (43.3%) fetal death occurred .Among them 5 fetus died with maternal death, 2 IUD and 1 still birth occurred. In 2 cases, the patients died after the fetus were delivered by normal vaginal delivery and 2 mothers survived after abortion of the fetus. Other local study shows, out of 30 mothers, 12 mothers survived with their fetus. Out of these, 07 burned women had good outcome with discontinuation of pregnancy. 09 mothers died due to burn.13 fetus survived but most of the fetus (17) not survived [13]. In an Indian study, among 49 thermally injured pregnant women in five years, there were 33(67.34%) maternal deaths and 34(69.39%) fetal deaths 14.

A 8 year long study in Iran shows Maternal death occurred in 12 of the 39 patients (30.8%). Fetal death occurred in 15 (38.5%) of the cases [15]. In this study an attempt was made to find out the factors which are related with maternal and fetal outcome. Relationship between gestational age with maternal and fetal outcome was assessed. Maximum maternal (69.2%) and fetal (76.9%) mortality was observed among the mother in 2nd trimester, but increasing gestational age was significantly related with increase in maternal death but not with fetal death. This result is similar to some studies [4,14], but dissimilar with other studies [13,15]. This study shows that there is significant relationship between percentage of burn with maternal and fetal mortality. Maximum maternal and fetal death was observed among the patient with burn involving >40% TBSA. This result is similar to other studies [4,21]. No study in our country had not established any relationship between TBSA with maternal and fetal mortality [13]. An Indian study shows > 60 per cent TBSA with 100 per cent fetal and maternal mortality and there was 50 percent maternal and fetal loss in the 40-59 percent TBSA group [5].

Another study shows, and a 50% burn was found to be critical to the finding of maternal and fetal mortality [15], as it was true in some other studies [22-25]. In a five years study in Nigeria no association was identified between mother’s burn characteristics (TBSA, burn type and cause of burn) and maternal and fetal outcome. Women with TBSA of >60% died in both pregnant (study) and non-pregnant (control) groups [26]. There is significant relationship between inhalation injury and maternal and fetal outcome. Inhalation injury was present in 6 patients 5 of them died. 5fetal death occurred in mother with inhalation injury. Other study also showed that inhalation injury was significantly associated with maternal and fetal outcome after thermal injury [15]. There is significant relationship between burn complications like burn shock, septicemia and infection present in lately presented cases with maternal and fetal outcome. 6 cases were admitted with burn shock all of them ended in maternal and fetal death. An Indian study by showed 33 maternal death was directly attributable to irreversible burn shock in 15 cases, Septicemia in 8 cases and respiratory complications including smoke inhalation pulmonary edema and embolism in 10 cases [14]. Relationship between Maternal anaemia with maternal and fetal outcome was assessed. Anaemia was present in 19 (63.3%) study subjects. Maximum maternal and fetal death was seen among the anaemic mothers. But difference in anaemia was not statistically significant between dead and alive mother and fetus.

There is no available data to compare the result. In no patient early wound excision & skin graft could be performed because of huge burn patient load in study center, unavailability of facilities and because of our sociocultural circumstances this is consistent with studies [3,15,26,27]. Split thickness skin grafting for the wound was deferred till delivery of the baby in most of the cases. Among 17 survived patient, 6 (35.3%) patient had STSG and one patient needed flap for coverage of wound, 10(58.8%) patients were discharged with no surgical intervention and advised for follow up. Wound healing period among the alive patients ranged from 14 to 66 days. Mean period of wound healing was 30.64 ± 14.02 days and the mean duration of hospital stay was 22.60 ± 18. 26 days.

Limitation of the study

The study was conducted in a single center in Dhaka city which may not be representative for the whole population. The sample size was small in the present study. If the study could have been done for a longer period of time, and in multiple centers, more significant data and results could have been yielded. Because in this study center, routine urine pregnancy tests were not carried out in all females of child-bearing age group, some of the positive cases may have been missed. In this study, none of the patients underwent early excision and skin grafting. If it was possible it could have influenced the result.

5. Conclusions

Like other developing countries, the incidence of burn with pregnancy is high in this country. Most burns with pregnancy are in the16-30years age group and accident was the major cause of injury. It can be prevented by counselling of pregnant mother about personal safety, application of household safety measures against burn, population education programme about burn. Maternal and fetal mortality is proportional to the TBSA burned. Inhalation injury, burn related complications like burn shock, septicemia and infection are major factors responsible for maternal and fetal mortality.

Early Hospitalization, prompt and aggressive fluid management, proper management of suspected inhalation injury and early identification and management of infection and sepsis by appropriate antibiotic which are safe for fetus can reduce both maternal and fetal death. Best care possible should be offered using a team approach with active participation of Plastic surgeon and Obstetrician with the help of anaesthesiologist.

Conflicts of interests

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Herndon DN. Total Burn Care, (4th edtn), Elsevier-Health Sciences Division ISBN: 9781437727869.
  2. Jeschke MG, Kamolz LP, Sjöberg F, et al. Handbook of Burns. ISBN: 978-3-7091-0347-0.
  3. Cunningham F, Leveno K, Bloom S, et al. Williams Obstetrics, (23rd edtn), McGraw-Hill; ISBN 071497013/978007149701.
  4. Masoodi Z, Ahmed I, Khurraam F, et al. Pregnancy in burns: Maternal and fetal outcome. Indian Journal of Burns 20 (2012): 36-41.
  5. Akhtar MA, Mulawkar PM, Kulkarni HR. Burns in pregnancy: Effect on maternal and fetal outcome. Burns 20 (1994): 351-355.
  6. Unsur V, Ataly C, Turhanoglu B, et al. A retrospective study of eleven pregnant women with thermal injuries. Eur d obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 64 (1996): 55-58.
  7. Jhon Ahmadon pan African medical journal 21 (2009): 21.
  8. Pacheco LD, Gei AF, Van Hook JW. Burn in pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology 5 (2005): 1210-1212.
  9. D.Amico,Christine;Advanced emergency Nursing journal 24 (2002): 26-39.
  10. Schmitz JT. Pregnant patients with burns. Am J ObstetGynecol 110 (1971): 57.
  11. Stage HA. Severe burns in the pregnant patients. ObstetGynecol 42 (1973): 259-262.
  12. Lippin Y. Therapeutic abortion in severely burned women. J Burn Car Rehabil 14 (1993): 398-405.
  13. Tasnim F, Sultana N. Burns in Pregnancy - Studies and Observations. BDJPS 7 (2016): 34-37
  14. Agarwal P. Thermal injury in pregnancy: Predicting maternal and fetal outcome. Indian J PlastSurg 38 (2005): 95-99.
  15. Pasalar M, Mohammadi AA, Rajaeefard A, et al. Epidemiology of burns during pregnancy in Southern Iran: Effect on maternal and fetal outcomes world applied science journal 28 (2013): 153-158.
  16. Napoli B, D’Arpa N, Masrllis, et al. Burns in pregnancy. Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters 8 (2000): 3-12.
  17. Rezaei E, Beiraghi TA, Aliakbarian H, et al. Acute burns during pregnancy: A retrospective study. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health 4 (2016): 540-543.
  18. Hatef BM. Burn in Pregnancy (A prospective study of 60 pregnant burned women with thermal injuries). Kufa Med. Journal, 2012; 15 (1):37-43.
  19. Mohammadi AA, Danesh N, Sabet B, et al. Self-inflicted burn injuries in southwest Iran. J. Burn. Care. Res. 29 (2008): 778-783.
  20. Lari AR, Alaghehbandan R, Panjeshahin MR et al. Suicidal behavior by burns in the province of Fars. Iran. Crisis 30 (2009): 98-101.
  21. Ghaffar UB, Akhter N, Faruqui TH, et al. Burns during Pregnancy: A Socio-Cultural Disease. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 32 (2009): 0971-0973.
  22. Karimi H, Momeni M, Rahbar H. Burn injuries during pregnancy in Iran. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 104 (2009): 132-134.
  23. Lari AR, Alaghehbandan R, Nikui R. Epidemiological study of 3341 burns patients during three years in Tehran, Iran. Burns 26 (2000): 49-53.
  24. Rode HA, Millar S, Cywes C. et al. Thermal injury in pregnancy-the neglected tragedy. S Afr Med J 77 (1990): 346-348.
  25. Mago VI, Ahmad N, Kochhar. Burnt pregnant wives: a social stigma. Burns 31 (2005): 175-177.
  26. Ogbogu CJ. Burn injuries in pregnancy in a regional burns center in nigeria: presentation, maternal and fetal outcome. Burns Open 2 (2018): 53-58.
  27. Prasanna M, Singh K. Early burn wound excision in major burns with pregnancy: a preliminary report. Burns 22 (1996): 234-237.

Journal Statistics

Impact Factor: * 4.2

CiteScore: 2.9

Acceptance Rate: 11.01%

Time to first decision: 10.4 days

Time from article received to acceptance: 2-3 weeks

Discover More: Recent Articles

Grant Support Articles

© 2016-2024, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved!