Home About Us Contact Us
Table of Content Volume 10 Issue 2 - May 2019

 

A study of measurement of unpaired and paired parameters of axis vertebra in males

 

Pathan F J1, Rubeena Hashmi2*

 

{1Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy} {2Senior Resident, Department of OBGY} MIMSR Medical College, Latur, Maharashtra.

Email: drferoz07@rediffmail.com

 

Abstract               Background: Axis vertebra (C2) is atypical in its shape and morphological characteristics and forms an integral part of the craniovertebral junction Aims and Objectives: Study of measurement of unpaired and paired parameters of axis vertebra in males. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the apparently normal individuals undergone MRI for neck included into the study over a six month period i.e. January 2018 to June 2018 in the six month period 50 males were included into study. We have done morphometric analysis of Axis Vertebra with respect to Body Axis – AP and Transverse diameter, Ant. height, Post. Height; Dense of axis –AP, Transverse diameter, Vertical height; Vertebral canal–AP and Transverse diameter etc. The paired parameters like Pedicle, Superior articular facet, Inferior articular facet, Lateral mass, Foramina transversarium, Lamina etc. was measured and data entered excel sheets and analyzed by excel software for windows. Result: In our study we have found in males the Body of Axis the Mean±SD in mm - AP diameter was -13.2± 0.42; Transverse was 17.96±0.87; Ant. height was 9.64± 0.38; Post. Height was 9.06± 0.56. In Dense axis it was, AP diameter -7.61 ±0.19, Transverse- 7.60 ± 0.20; Vertical-15.79 ± 0.87; Vertebral canal – AP Was 12.40 ± 0.55, Transverse was 18.64 ± 0.77. The measurement on Lt. and Rt. Respectively of Pedicle -Length was 27.98± 4.12 and 27.87± 3.45 Width was 6.98± 2.87 and 6.54± 3.12 ; Height was 8.78±2.61 and 8.74 ± 3.42 ; Median angle -8.12±1.32 and 8.18± 3.42; Superior articular facet AP-diameter was 16.21±1.65 and 16.31±1.81; Trans. Diameter was 14.63±2.13 and 14.42±1.45; Superior angle of SAF was 78.81±4.35O and 78.62±3.75. Conclusion: It can be concluded from our study that parameters of Axis vertebra on unpaired and paired i.e. Rt. and Lt. side is definitely useful for the diagnosis, surgical management and understanding the pathology cervical neck etc.

Key Word: paired parameters of axis vertebra, unpaired parameters of axis vertebra, Pedicle, Dense, Body of axis vertebra, Morphometry of axis vertebra.

 

INTRODUCTION

Axis vertebra (C2) is atypical in its shape and morphological characteristics and forms an integral part of the craniovertebral junction1-3. It has various distinct anatomical features like dens or odontoid process, two lateral masses with obliquely oriented articulating facets, transverse processes with foramina transversarium d spinous process. It is related to various vita and a usually bi structures like the cervico-medullary junction, cranial nerves, cervical spinal nerve roots and vertebral arteries. Various pathological processes like congenital skeletal dysplasias, trauma, infection, neoplasm etc. affect the axis vertebra2-6 So the details of measurements are necessary and different in males and females for the various surgical procedures at neck so we have done so we have done a Study of measurement of unpaired and paired parameters of axis vertebra in males.

 

METHODOLOGY

This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the apparently normal individuals undergone MRI for neck included into the study over a six month period i.e. January 2018 to June 2018 in the six month period 50 males were included into study. We have done morphometric analysis of Axis Vertebra with respect to Body Axis AP and Transverse diameter, Ant. height, Post. Height; Dense of axis AP, Transverse diameter, Vertical height; Vertebral canal AP and Transverse diameter etc. The paired parameters like Pedicle, Superior articular facet, Inferior articular facet, Lateral mass, Foramina transversarium, Lamina etc. was measured and data entered excel sheets and analyzed by excel software for windows.

RESULT

Table 1: Morphometric analysis of Axis Vertebra in the male patients (n=50)

 

Body Axis

Dense axis

Vertebral canal

 

Type of diameter in mm

Type of diameter in mm

Type of diameter in mm

 

AP

Transverse

Ant. height

Post. Height

AP

Transverse

Vertical

AP

Transverse

Mean

13.2

17.96

9.64

9.06

7.61

7.60

15.79

12.40

18.64

SD

0.42

0.87

0.38

0.56

0.19

0.20

0.87

0.55

0.77

Max

14.2

19.6

10.2

9.8

7.9

8

17.2

13.2

20.2

Min

12.3

16.5

8.5

7.9

7.1

7.3

14.1

10.5

17.6

 In males the Body of Axis the mean±SD in mm - AP diameter was -13.2± 0.42; Transverse was 17.96±0.87; Ant. height was 9.64± 0.38; Post. Height was 9.06± 0.56. In Dense axis it was, AP diameter -7.61 ±0.19, Transverse- 7.60 ± 0.20; Vertical-15.79 ± 0.87; Vertebral canal AP Was 12.40 ± 0.55, Transverse was 18.64 ± 0.77

 

Table 2: Distribution of the paired parameters of pedicle and articular facets(n=50)

Parameter

Mean ±SD  (Lt.)

Mean ± SD  (Rt.)

Pedicle

 

 

Length

27.98± 4.12

27.87± 3.45

Width

6.98± 2.87

6.54± 3.12

Height

8.78±2.61

8.74 ± 3.42

Median angle

8.12± 1.32

8.18± 3.42

Superior articular facet

 

 

AP-diameter

16.21±1.65

16.31±1.81

Trans. Diameter

14.63±2.13

14.42±1.45

Superior angle of SAF

78.81±4.35O

78.62±3.75 O

Inferior articular facet

 

 

AP-diameter

9.56 ±1.42

9.75±1.98

Trans. Diameter

9.75±2.12

9.85±1.63

Lateral mass

7.92± 2.36

7.86±1.31

Foramina transversarium

 

 

Height

6.54±1.65

6.47±1.57

Width

5.32± 1.32

5.27± 0.95

Lamina

 

 

Length

14.21± 1.25

13.54±3.27

Height

14.01± 1.28

12.34±2.58

Thickness

9.02± 3.12

5.69± 1.35

 


The measurement on Lt. and Rt. Respectively of Pedicle -Length was 27.98± 4.12 and 27.87± 3.45 Width was 6.98± 2.87 and 6.54± 3.12 ; Height was 8.78±2.61 and 8.74 ± 3.42 ; Median angle -8.12±1.32 and 8.18± 3.42; Superior articular facet AP-diameter was 16.21±1.65 and 16.31±1.81; Trans. Diameter was 14.63±2.13 and 14.42±1.45; Superior angle of SAF was 78.81±4.35O and 78.62±3.75 O; Inferior articular facet was AP-diameter was 9.56 ±1.42 and 9.75±1.98; Trans. Diameter 9.75±2.12 and 9.85±1.63; Lateral mass was 7.92± 2.36 and 7.86±1.31; Foramina transversarium Height was 6.54±1.65 and 6.47±1.57; Width was 5.32± 1.32 and 5.27± 0.95; Lamina Length was 14.21± 1.25 and 13.54±3.27; Height was 14.01± 1.28 and 12.34±2.58; Thickness was 9.02± 3.12 and 5.69± 1.35

DISCUSSION

Axis, the second cervical vertebra, forms a pivot on which the atlas rotates carrying the head to allow greater range of motion at the atlantoaxial joints7, 8. The lateral masses of axis have good cancellous bone quality beneath the articular surface of facets that makes this area a good site for insertion of an internal fixation device9. The elements of pedicle and pedicle axis are critical to the structural anatomy of axis vertebra which are important to normal function and also for cases of pathology or fractures when surgical intervention is required10,11. The superior articular facets (SAF) of axis differ from other vertebral facets which make this region more prone to vertebral artery injury during screw fixation12. In axis vertebrae the SAF lies in proximity to the body and medial aspect of the axis of the pedicle whereas SAF of other vertebrae are lying in proximity to the junction of pedicle and lamina and also the vertebral artery foramen is lying partially or completely in the undersurface of axis while in other vertebrae the vertebral artery foramen is located entirely in relation to foramen transversarium13,14. This unusual location of vertebral artery foramen makes the vertebral artery more prone to injury during screw fixation15.  In our study we have found in males the Body of Axis the mean±SD in mm - AP diameter was -13.2± 0.42; Transverse was 17.96±0.87; Ant. height was 9.64± 0.38; Post. Height was 9.06± 0.56. In Dense axis it was, AP diameter -7.61 ±0.19, Transverse- 7.60 ± 0.20; Vertical-15.79 ± 0.87; Vertebral canal AP Was 12.40 ± 0.55, Transverse was 18.64 ± 0.77  The measurement on Lt. and Rt. Respectively of Pedicle -Length was 27.98± 4.12 and 27.87± 3.45  Width was 6.98± 2.87 and 6.54± 3.12 ; Height was 8.78±2.61 and 8.74 ± 3.42 ; Median angle -8.12±1.32 and 8.18± 3.42; Superior articular facet AP-diameter was 16.21±1.65 and 16.31±1.81; Trans. Diameter was 14.63±2.13 and 14.42±1.45; Superior angle of SAF was 78.81±4.35O and 78.62±3.75 O; Inferior articular facet was AP-diameter was 9.56 ±1.42 and 9.75±1.98; Trans. Diameter  9.75±2.12 and 9.85±1.63; Lateral mass was 7.92± 2.36 and 7.86±1.31; Foramina transversarium Height was 6.54±1.65 and 6.47±1.57; Width was 5.32± 1.32 and 5.27± 0.95; Lamina Length was 14.21± 1.25 and 13.54±3.27; Height was 14.01± 1.28 and 12.34±2.58; Thickness was 9.02± 3.12 and 5.69± 1.35  These findings are similar to Shilpa Gosavi16 et al they found the mean antero posterior diameter of body of axis vertebra was 14.77±1.33mm. The external height of lateral mass on right side was 8.77 ±1.43 mm, 8.28±1.26mm on the left side. The height of dens was 14.86±1.54mm and average transverse diameter was 9.28mm.

 

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded from our study that parameters of Axis vertebra on unpaired and paired i.e. Rt. and Lt. side is definitely useful for the diagnosis, surgical management and understanding the pathology cervical neck etc.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Standring S. Gray's anatomy. The Anatomical basis of Clinical practice. 40th ed London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2008.
  2. Smoker WR. Craniovertebral junction: normal anatomy, craniometry, and congenital anomalies. Radiographics. 1994 Mar; 14(2):255-77. ah, C.E.
  3. Offiah & Day, E. Insights Imaging (2017) 8: 29. doi:10.1007/s13244-016-0530-5
  4. Elena Serchi, Saul F. Morales-Valero, Jeremy Fogelson. (2014) Pathology of the Craniovertebral Junction. Contemporary Neurosurgery 36:19, 1-7
  5. Jain N, Verma R, Garga UC, Baruah BP, Jain SK, Bhaskar SN. CT and MR imaging of odontoid abnormalities: Apictorial review. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2016;26:108-19
  6.  Dhadve RU, Garge SS, Vyas PD, et al. Multidetector Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Craniovertebral junction Abnormalities. North American Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015; 7(8):362-367.
  7.  M. William, R. L. M. Newell, and P. Collin, “The back: cervical vertebrae,” in Gray’s Anatomy, S. Standring, H. Ellis, J. C. Haely, and A. Williams, Eds., pp. 742–746, Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, London, UK, 39th edition, 2005.
  8.  A. A. Madawi, G. Solanki, A. T. H. Casey, and H. A. Crockard, “Variation of the groove in the axis vertebra for the vertebral artery,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 820–823, 1997.
  9. M. H. Heggeness and B. J. Doherty, “The trabecular anatomy of the axis,” Spine, vol. 18, no. 14, pp. 1945–1949, 1993.
  10.  R. Xu, M. C. Nadaud, N. A. Ebraheim, and R. A. Yeasting, “Morphology of the second cervical vertebra and the posterior projection of the C2 pedicle axis,” Spine, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 259– 263, 1995.
  11.  L. Rogers, “Spine and spinal cord,” in Surgical Applied Anatomy, pp. 505–513, Cassell and Company, London, UK, 11th edition, 1947
  12.  L. M. Overton and J. W. Grossman, “Anatomical variations in the articulation between the second and third cervical vertebrae,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 36, pp. 155– 161, 1952.
  13.   C. Taitz and B. Arensburg, “Vertebral artery tortuosity with concomitant erosion of the foramen of the transverse process of the axis. Possible clinical implications,” Acta Anatomica, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 104–108, 1991.
  14.  B. J. Doherty and M. H. Heggeness, “The quantitative anatomy of the atlas,” Spine, vol. 19, no. 22, pp. 2497–2500, 1994.
  15.  S. Gupta and A. Goel, “Quantitative anatomy of the lateral masses of the atlas and axis vertebrae,” Neurology India, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 120–125, 2000.
  16. Shilpa Gosavi et al. Morphometric study of Axis vertebra. Eur J Anat, 2012;  16(2): 98-103.