Home About Us Contact Us
Table of Content Volume 10 Issue 2 - May 2019

 

 

Comparison of morphology and morphometry of human pulmonary and porcine pulmonary heart valves

 

Supadevi S1, Ramesh Kumar Subramaniam2*

 

1Assistant professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Kilpauk Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.

2Professor, Department of Anatomy, Sri Ramachandra Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.

Email: supadevi.dr@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Background: There is an increased interest in the diagnosis and treatment of human valvular heart diseases. When heart valve disease progresses to a point that treatment by medicines does not provide relief from patient symptoms, surgery to repair or replace becomes the best alternative. Aims and objective: To compare the morphology and morphometry of human pulmonary and porcine pulmonary heart valves Material and methods: Study conducted in Sri Ramachandra medical college and research institute, Chennai during the period of 2014-15.In the present total number of 20 porcine heart valves was compared with 20 human heart valves and their morphology and morphometry was analyzed and compared. Both the human hearts and porcine hearts were weighed and the heart weight ranging from 300 gm – 450 gm was only used in this study. Porcine heart was obtained from slaughter house immediately after the slaughter and the specimen was washed with normal saline and the heart was fixed in 10 % formal saline solution. The formalin fixed specimens of human heart were procured from the embalmed cadavers. The data was entered and they were statistically analyzed using SPSS software 20 version. Results: The circumference of the pulmonary valve in human was 68.06mm and that of the porcine was 52.94mm and the p value was significant (p value: 0.000). The attached margin of human and porcine pulmonary valve showed significant difference on both (0.000). The free margin of the pulmonary valve showed insignificant p value (0.152- 0.169).The effective height of human pulmonary valve scallop had significant difference with porcine pulmonary scallops (0.005) and it was more in human pulmonary valve than porcine valve. The height of the scallop was having insignificant difference (0.620- 0.795). Conclusion: The porcine valve can be used in replacement surgeries of the human heart valves by matching the morphometry and reducing the geometrical difference to their minimum by using any interventional radiology. The porcine heart valves show excellent features similar to the human heart valves and they can be used in replacement surgeries as good bioprostheses in place of mechanical prosthesis irrespective of their other biochemical and other properties

Key Word: pulmonary heart valves, human heart, porcine heart

 

 

INTRODUCTION

There is an increased interest in the diagnosis and treatment of human valvular heart diseases1. When heart valve disease progresses to a point that treatment by medicines does not provide relief from patient symptoms, surgery to repair or replace becomes the best alternative. If the surgery is not to repair then the choice is more likely between carbon based mechanical valve and biological tissue valve. The valve is chosen depending upon the requirement to improve the quality of life with minimal risk. In tissue valves the homograft or xenograft becomes the best choice. There is an increasing popularity of mitral valve repair and there is a current interest on the homograft and hetrograft, warranting a new look at the normal functional anatomy of the systems2. Xenograft tissue valves are harvested from porcine heart and porcine bio-prosthesis has been used since 1960. The left atrioventricular valve apparatus of pigs has important application in experimental, clinical and surgical fields. The proven similarity between pig’s hearts and human hearts has prioritized their widespread use in heart research3,4. Each heart valve is composed of different structures of which each one has its own histo - morphological profile. The aortic valve is considered as the center piece of heart and is considered as the most important valve in respect to the cardiac function and the variation in the anatomy of the human aortic valve has been studied5,6. The pulmonary valve is used as the valve substitute for the aortic valve in Ross procedure7. Normal data of the tricuspid valve complex and the published work on the tricuspid valve is less8 compared to the literature available on the detailed anatomy of mitral valve. Although the aortic and the pulmonary valves as well as the mitral and the tricuspid valves show similarities in their architecture, they are individually designed to ensure optimal function with regard to their role in the cardiac cycle. There is less number of studies found to show the morphology of all four human heart valves. Although the xenograft from porcine are best suited for replacement surgery on heart valves and they are used as novel prostheses for their own advantages. There are very less number of studies that has systematically analyzed the comparative anatomy of all four human heart valves with porcine heart valves.              Hence this study was carried out to put forth the morphological features of the porcine pulmonary heart valves in comparison with human pulmonary heart valves and their renounced use in heart valve replacement.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

To compare the morphology and morphometry of human pulmonary and porcine pulmonary heart valves

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present study was conducted in department of Anatomy of Study conducted in Sri Ramachandra medical college and research institute, Chennai during the period of 2014-15 to Compare the morphology and morphometry of human pulmonary and porcine pulmonary heart valves. For this purpose total number of 20 porcine heart valves was compared with 20 human heart valves and their morphology and morphometry was analyzed and compared. Both the human hearts and porcine hearts were weighed and the heart weight ranging from 300 gm – 450 gm was only used in this study.

Acquisition of porcine heart valves: Porcine heart was obtained from slaughter house immediately after the slaughter and the specimen was washed with normal saline and the blood clots were removed from the external surface of the heart and from the great vessels as much as possible. Then the heart was fixed in 10 % formal saline solution. They were brought to the department for the structural analysis of the valves. The ascending component of the aorta and pulmonary trunk was cut above the arterial valves.

Acquisition of human heart valves: The formalin fixed specimens were procured from the embalmed cadavers, from the Department of Anatomy in Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute.

 

METHODOLOGY

The pulmonary valve was opened in between the right anterior and posterior and extended till the right ventricle. The attached margin of the scallop was measured using silk thread along the attached margin of the scallop and the free margin was measured in the same way. The effective height of the scallop was the height from the lowest point of the attached margin (nadir) to the free margin of the cusp and measured using the verniercaliper. This does not measure the length of the cusp. The height of the scallop was measured using verniercaliper from the nadir to the point on the circumference. The aortic valve circumference was measured at the sino-tubular junction, which can be observed as a ridge above the aortic valve scallops. Then the valve was opened along the commissure between the right and left coronary scallop. The attached margin, free margin, effective height and height of the scallop were measured in the same manner as the pulmonary valve. The height of the ostium was measured from the inner aspect of the attached margin to the opening of the coronary vessel using verniercaliper. Since the hearts were preserved in formalin and there was possibility of some tissue shrinkage to occur, all the measurement was made to nearest millimeter by a metric scale. The observations were made and the results were tabulated.

Statistical analysis: The data was entered and they were statistically analyzed using SPSS software 20 version. All the dependent variables were compared using student t test and independent sample test.


 

RESULTS

Table 1: Mean value of the attached margin and free margin of the pulmonary valve (Human and Porcine)

It was seen that the circumference of the pulmonary valve in human was 68.06mm and that of the porcine was 52.94mm and the p value was significant (p value: 0.000). The circumference of pulmonary valve was more in porcine than the human heart valves. The attached margin of human and porcine pulmonary valve showed significant difference on both (0.000). The free margin of the pulmonary valve showed insignificant p value (0.152- 0.169). All the parameters regarding the pulmonary were more in human pulmonary valve than porcine pulmonary valve.

 

Table 2: Comparison of Mean value of the attached margin and free margin of the pulmonary valve (Human and Porcine)

 

Table 3: Mean value of the effective height of pulmonary scallop (Human and Porcine)

It was observed that the effective height of human pulmonary valve scallop had significant difference with porcine pulmonary scallops (0.005) and it was more in human pulmonary valve than porcine valve. The height of the scallop was having insignificant difference (0.620- 0.795).

Table 4: Comparison of Mean value of the effective height of pulmonary scallop (Human and Porcine)

 

1

     Figure 1: Human Pulmonary Valve       Figure 2 : Porcine Pulmonary Valve

DISCUSSION

The present study was conducted with the aim to compare the morphology and morphometry of human pulmonary and porcine pulmonary heart valves. For this purpose total 20 cases of Human and porcine pulmonary heart valves were compared. In the present study the circumference of the pulmonary valve at the level of junction of the cusps with the arterial wall was 68.06mm. The attached margin and free margin of the right posterior, left posterior and anterior was 36.52 mm, 37.93 mm, 39.36 mm, 23.03 mm, 25.18 mm and 23.74 mm. Height of the scallops was also observed and it was 12.17 mm for anterior, 13.72 mm for the left posterior and 13.01mm for the right posterior. The circumference of the pulmonary valve in human was 68.06mm and that of the porcine was 52.94mm and the difference observed was statistically significant (p value: 0.000). The circumference of pulmonary valve was more in porcine than the human heart valves. The attached margin of human and porcine pulmonary valve showed significant difference on both (0.000). The free margin of the pulmonary valve showed insignificant p value (0.152- 0.169). All the parameters regarding the pulmonary were more in human pulmonary valve than porcine pulmonary valve. Michael G. Bateman, et al.,9 observed the mean annular diameter of pulmonary valve as 25.4 mm. It was seen that the free margin and attached margin length of all the three leaflets were observed. The pulmonary valve is used in place of aortic valve in replacement surgeries. The valve has three scallops as of the aortic but they are referred as the right anterior, left anterior and posterior. The mean circumference of the pulmonary valve was 52.94 mm. Length of the attached margin of the 3 scallop was 31.46 mm- 31.91 mm. The length of the free margin was 22.75 mm- 23.66 mm. Effective height of the leaflet was 3.56 mm- 8.68 mm. The height of the scallop was 12.67 mm-12.87 mm. The valve almost resembles the aortic valve in circumference, height of the scallop, effective height, attached margin and free margin. Martin Misfield and Hans-Hinrich Sievers10 studied the pulmonary valve in accordance with aortic valve and observed that the root of the pulmonary valve does not have a circular form and the root was not a well defined fibrous structure. They also observed that the nodule of arantii was less frequent when compared to the aortic leaflets. They have also studied the valves microscopic structure and the neuronal innervations of the leaflets.

 

CONCLUSION

Human pulmonary valve does not correlate with porcine pulmonary valve in morphometry, but the features were similar in both the human and porcine heart valves. And the above said features were compared to their maximum without any inter observer variation. Thus the porcine valve can be used in replacement surgeries of the human heart valves by matching the morphometry and reducing the geometrical difference to their minimum by using any interventional radiology. The porcine heart valves show excellent features similar to the human heart valves and they can be used in replacement surgeries as good bioprostheses in place of mechanical prosthesis irrespective of their other biochemical and other properties

 

REFERENCES

  1. Rogers JH, Bolling SF (2009). The tricuspid valve: current perspective and evolving management of tricuspid regurgitation. Circulation; 119: pp 2718- 25.
  2. Kunzelman K.S, Cochran R.P, Verrier E.D and Eberhart R.C (1994a). Anatomic basis for mitral valve modelling.J. Heart valve Dis; 3(5): pp 491-6.
  3. Hughes HC (1986). Swine in cardiovascular research. Laboratory Animal science; 36: pp 348-350.
  4. Crick, SJ. Sheppard, MN., HO., SY, Gebstien, L and Anderson, RH (1998). Anatomy of the pig heart: comparisons with normal cardiac structure. Journal of Anatomy; 193(1): pp 105- 119.
  5. Silver M.A. and Robert, W.C (1985). Detailed anatomy of the normally functioning aortic valve in hears of normal and increased weight. Am. J. Cardiol; 55: pp 454- 461.
  6. Robert Walmsley (1978). Anatomy of human mitral valve in adult cadaver and comparative anatomy of the valve. British Heart journal; 40: pp 351- 366.
  7. Ross, D. N. (1967). Replacment of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet 2; pp 956- 958.
  8. Skwarek .M, J. Hreczecha, M. Dudziak, M. Grzybiak (2006). The morphology of the right atrioventricular valve in the adult human heart. Folia Morphol; 65(3): pp 200-208.
  9. Michael G. bateman, Jason l. Quill, Alexander J.Hill and Paul A. Iaizzo (2013). The anatomy and Function of the semilunar valves. Heart valves; from Design to Clinical Implantation; 10: pp 27-43.
  10. Martin Misfeld and Hans- Hinrichsievers (2007). Heart valve macro- and microstructure. Phil. Trans. R. Soc; 362: pp 1421- 1436.