In collaboration with Payame Noor University and Iranian Electronic Learning Association

Document Type : scientific-research

Authors

1 Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University faculty member (Assistant Professor)

2 History teacher and graduate of Farhangian University

Abstract

Educational technology has grown appreciably in recent years and the number of books and articles published in this field is increasing day by day, and therefore the necessity of scientific research is determined. The current research is a kind of descriptive study that was carried out using scientometric indicators. the research area includes all the articles on Educational technology that were indexed in the Science Direct citation database from 1999 to 2022, and after filtering them, 7550 of them were analyzed with the help of Excel and VOS Viewer software. It was analyzed for analysis and display of data. The results of the research show that the number of articles has an upward trend and 2015 had the largest share in the number of articles. Also, Research articles (7,442), Journal Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (2,111) and scientific field Social Sciences (3,220) were ranked first. 13 clusters were identified that the topics of lifelong learning, instructional design, secondary education, interactive learning environment, architectures for educational, and pedagogical are very popular and also Previous in the field of Elearning and subjects: COVID-19, artificial intelligence, gamification, learning analytics, augmented reality, and Distance learning are new in the field of Educational Technology.

Keywords

Article Title [Persian]

ترسیم نقشه علم سنجی فناوری آموزشی (1999-2022)

Authors [Persian]

  • رباب رحمتی 1
  • امیر کریمی 2

1 گروه علوم تربیتی، عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه فرهنگیان (استادیار)

2 دبیر تاریخ و دانش آموخته دانشگاه فرهنگیان

Abstract [Persian]

فناوری آموزشی در سال‌های اخیر رشد محسوسی داشته است و روز به روز بر تعداد کتاب‌ها و مقالات منتشر شده در این زمینه افزوده می‌شود و از این رو ضرورت تحقیق علمی مشخص می‌شود. روش تحقیق توصیفی-کاربردی است و حوزه تحقیق شامل کلیه مقالات فناوری آموزشی است که از سال 1999 تا 2022 در پایگاه استنادی Science Direct نمایه شده و پس از فیلتر کردن، 7550 مورد از آنها با کمک Excel و VOS مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفته است. نرم افزار نمایشگر برای تجزیه و تحلیل و نمایش داده ها مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج تحقیق نشان می دهد که تعداد مقالات روند صعودی داشته و سال 2015 بیشترین سهم را در تعداد مقالات داشته است. همچنین مقالات پژوهشی (7442)، مجله Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (2111) و رشته علمی علوم اجتماعی (3220) رتبه اول را کسب کردند. 13 خوشه شناسایی شد که موضوعات یادگیری مادام‌العمر، طراحی آموزشی، آموزش متوسطه، محیط یادگیری تعاملی، معماری‌های آموزشی و آموزشی بسیار پرطرفدار است و همچنین موضوعات قبلی در زمینه آموزش الکترونیکی و موضوعات: COVID-19، هوش مصنوعی، گیمیفیکیشن، تجزیه و تحلیل یادگیری، واقعیت افزوده و یادگیری از راه دور در زمینه فناوری آموزشی جدید هستند.

Keywords [Persian]

  • فناوری آموزشی
  • VOSviewer
  • علم سنجی
Janks H. Critical literacy’s ongoing importance for education. J Adolesc Adult Lit. 2014;57(5):349–56.
IEM JS. An overview of progress and problems in educational technology. Interact Educ Multimed IEM [Internet]. 2001 [cited 2022 Aug 16];(3):27–37. Available from: https://www.raco.cat/index.php/iem/article/view/204137
Science SL. The importance of educational technology in teaching. Int J Cogn Res Sci [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2022 Aug 16];3(1):111–4. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/the-importance-of-educational-technology-in-teaching
Xiao Y, Meier EB. Education technology as a catalyst for education development in china: A policy perspective. Int Perspect Educ Soc. 2011;15:313–43.
Lyapina I, Sotnikova E, Lebedeva O, Makarova T, Skvortsova N. Smart technologies: perspectives of usage in higher education. Int J Educ Manag. 2019 Apr 8;33(3):454–61.
Menon S, Suresh M. Enablers of technology agility in higher education. Int J Inf Learn Technol. 2022 Apr 12;39(2):166–96.
Shurville S, Browne T, Whitaker M. Accommodating the newfound strategic importance of educational technologists within higher education: A critical literature review. Campus-Wide Inf Syst. 2009 Jun 19;26(3):201–31.
Lamb AJ, Weiner JM. Technology as infrastructure for change: district leader understandings of 1:1 educational technology initiatives and educational change. J Educ Adm. 2021;59(3):335–51.
Bower M. Technology-Enhanced Learning – Conclusions and Future Directions. Des Technol Learn. 2017 Aug 3;405–28.
Stroeva OA, Zviagintceva Y, Tokmakova E, Petrukhina E, Polyakova O. Application of remote technologies in education. Int J Educ Manag. 2019 Apr 8;33(3):503–10.
Wankel LA, Blessinger P. New pathways in higher education: An introduction to using mobile technologies. Cutting-Edge Technol High Educ. 2013;6(PARTD):3–17.
Al-Qallaf CL, Al-Mutairi ASR. Digital literacy and digital content supports learning: The impact of blogs on teaching English as a foreign language. Electron Libr. 2016;34(3):522–47.
Chen X, Zou D, Xie H. Fifty years of British Journal of Educational Technology: A topic modeling based bibliometric perspective. Br J Educ Technol [Internet]. 2020 May 1 [cited 2022 Aug 16];51(3):692–708. Available from:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bjet.12907
Goksu I. Bibliometric mapping of mobile learning. Telemat Informatics. 2021 Jan 1;56:101491.
Jiménez CR, Prieto MS, García SA. Technology and Higher Education: A Bibliometric Analysis. Educ Sci 2019, Vol 9, Page 169 [Internet]. 2019 Jul 3 [cited 2022 Aug 16];9(3):169. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/9/3/169/htm
Phillips T, Ozogul G. Learning Analytics Research in Relation to Educational Technology: Capturing Learning Analytics Contributions with Bibliometric Analysis. TechTrends 2020 646 [Internet]. 2020 Jun 9 [cited 2022 Aug 16];64(6):878–86. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11528-020-00519-y
Chen X, Yu G, Cheng G, Hao T. Research topics, author profiles, and collaboration networks in the top-ranked journal on educational technology over the past 40 years: a bibliometric analysis. J Comput Educ 2019 64 [Internet]. 2019 Oct 26 [cited 2022 Aug 16];6(4):563–85. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40692-019-00149-1
Shen C wen, Ho J tsung. Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: A bibliometric analysis with latent semantic approach. Comput Human Behav. 2020 Mar 1;104:106177.
Tamala JK, Maramag EI, Simeon KA, Ignacio JJ. A bibliometric analysis of sustainable oil and gas production research using VOSviewer. Clean Eng Technol. 2022 Apr 1;7.
Waltman L, van Eck NJ, Noyons ECM. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. J Informetr. 2010 Oct;4(4):629–35.
Perianes-Rodriguez A, Waltman L, van Eck NJ. Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. J Informetr. 2016 Nov 1;10(4):1178–95.
Garzón-Artacho E, Sola-Martínez T, Romero-Rodríguez JM, Gómez-García G. Teachers’ perceptions of digital competence at the lifelong learning stage. Heliyon. 2021 Jul 1;7(7).
Hursen C. Evaluation in terms of content analysis of lifelong learning research. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2011;28:972–6.
Mohammad Mehdi M, Mahboubeh Sadat F. The role of educational technology in lifelong learning Islamic Azad University - Isfahan science and research branch. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2011;28:842–4.
Wu SPW, Rau MA. Effectiveness and efficiency of adding drawing prompts to an interactive educational technology when learning with visual representations. Learn Instr. 2018 Jun 1;55:93–104.
Wu SPW, Corr J, Rau MA. How instructors frame students’ interactions with educational technologies can enhance or reduce learning with multiple representations. Comput Educ. 2019 Jan 1;128:199–213.
McLaren BM, Richey JE, Nguyen H, Hou X. How instructional context can impact learning with educational technology: Lessons from a study with a digital learning game. Comput Educ. 2022 Mar 1;178.
Verbruggen S, Depaepe F, Torbeyns J. Effectiveness of educational technology in early mathematics education: A systematic literature review. Int J Child-Computer Interact. 2021 Mar 1;27.
Schmid R, Petko D. Does the use of educational technology in personalized learning environments correlate with self-reported digital skills and beliefs of secondary-school students? Comput Educ. 2019 Jul 1;136:75–86.
Valtonen T, López-Pernas S, Saqr M, Vartiainen H, Sointu ET, Tedre M. The nature and building blocks of educational technology research. Comput Human Behav. 2022 Mar 1;128.
Hwang GJ, Chen PY. Interweaving gaming and educational technologies: Clustering and forecasting the trends of game-based learning research by bibliometric and visual analysis. Entertain Comput. 2022 Jan 1;40.
Gerjets PH, Hesse FW. When are powerful learning environments effective? The role of learner activities and of students’ conceptions of educational technology. Int J Educ Res. 2004;41(6):445–65.
Yilmaz R, Yurdugül H, Karaoğlan Yilmaz FG, Şahi̇n M, Sulak S, Aydin F, et al. Smart MOOC integrated with intelligent tutoring: A system architecture and framework model proposal. Comput Educ Artif Intell [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 13];3:100092. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666920X22000479
Yulianto B, Heriyanni E, Dewi LC, Adinugroho TY. Architecture and Implementation of Instant Messaging in Educational Institution. Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;59:5–13.
Fonseca D, Villagrasa S, Martí N, Redondo E, Sánchez A. Visualization Methods in Architecture Education Using 3D Virtual Models and Augmented Reality in Mobile and Social Networks. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2013 Oct;93:1337–43.
Youhasan P, Chen Y, Lyndon MP, Henning MA. University teachers’ perceptions of readiness for flipped classroom pedagogy in undergraduate nursing education: A qualitative study. J Prof Nurs. 2022 Jul 1;41:26–32.
Canzonetta J. Repurposing plagiarism detection services for responsible pedagogical application and (In)Formative assessment of source attribution practices. Assess Writ. 2021 Oct 1;50.
Marjanovic O. Using process-oriented, sequencing educational technologies: Some important pedagogical issues. Comput Human Behav. 2007 Nov;23(6):2742–59.
Tuma F, Kamel MK, Shebrain S, Ghanem M, Blebea J. Alternatives surgical training approaches during COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Med Surg. 2021 Feb 1;62:253–7.
Hao X, Peng X, Ding X, Qin Y, Lv M, Li J, et al. Application of digital education in undergraduate nursing and medical interns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jan 1;108.
Seah B, Ang ENK, Liaw SY, Lau ST, Wang W. Curriculum changes for pre-registration nursing education in times of COVID-19: For the better or worse? Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar 1;98.
Gandolfi E, Ferdig RE, Kratcoski A. A new educational normal an intersectionality-led exploration of education, learning technologies, and diversity during COVID-19. Technol Soc. 2021 Aug 1;66.
Succar T, Beaver HA, Lee AG. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on ophthalmology medical student teaching: educational innovations, challenges, and future directions. Surv Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 1;67(1):217–25.
Hwang G-J, Chien S-Y. Definition, roles, and potential research issues of the metaverse in education: An artificial intelligence perspective. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2022;3:100082.
Nazari N, Shabbir MS, Setiawan R. Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial. Heliyon. 2021 May 1;7(5).
Al-Badi A, Khan A, Eid-Alotaibi. Perceptions of Learners and Instructors towards Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Learning. Procedia Comput Sci. 2022;201(C):445–51.
Hara CYN, Goes F dos SN, Camargo RAA, Fonseca LMM, Aredes NDA. Design and evaluation of a 3D serious game for communication learning in nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 May 1;100.
Kowitlawakul Y, Tan JJM, Suebnukarn S, Nguyen HD, Poo DCC, Chai J, et al. Utilizing educational technology in enhancing undergraduate nursing students’ engagement and motivation: A scoping review. J Prof Nurs [Internet]. 2022 Sep [cited 2022 Aug 13];42:262–75. Available from:
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S8755722322001168
Sepasgozar SME. Immersive on-the-job training module development and modeling users’ behavior using parametric multi-group analysis: A modified educational technology acceptance model. Technol Soc. 2022 Feb 1;68.
Hincapie M, Diaz C, Valencia A, Contero M, Güemes-Castorena D. Educational applications of augmented reality: A bibliometric study. Comput Electr Eng. 2021 Jul 1;93.
Hu X, Goh YM, Lin A. Educational impact of an Augmented Reality (AR) application for teaching structural systems to non-engineering students. Adv Eng Informatics. 2021 Oct 1;50.
Arici F, Yildirim P, Caliklar Ş, Yilmaz RM. Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Comput Educ. 2019 Dec 1;142.
Baigusheva KM, Baigabylov NO, Jarassova GS, Akanova AS. Realization of Distance Educational Technologies on the Basis of Automated Informational System. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2013 Oct;89:436–9.
Moreira R, Santos V, Garbe G, Carmagnani MI, Salvador ME, Carvalho A. Using educational technology for CPR training: The development of an educational distance program through the Moodle platform. Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:151–2.
Funkhouser BJ, Mouza C. Drawing on technology: An investigation of preservice teacher beliefs in the context of an introductory educational technology course. Comput Educ. 2013;62:271–85.