skip to main content
10.3115/1220575.1220617dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshltConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Collective content selection for concept-to-text generation

Published:06 October 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

A content selection component determines which information should be conveyed in the output of a natural language generation system. We present an efficient method for automatically learning content selection rules from a corpus and its related database. Our modeling framework treats content selection as a collective classification problem, thus allowing us to capture contextual dependencies between input items. Experiments in a sports domain demonstrate that this approach achieves a substantial improvement over context-agnostic methods.

References

  1. J. Besag. 1986. On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 48:259--302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Y. Boykov, O. Veksler, R. Zabih. 1999. Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. In ICCV, 377--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. A. Duboue, K. R. McKeown. 2003. Statistical acquisition of content selection rules for natural language generation. In Proceedings of the EMNLP, 121--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Greig, B. Porteous, A. Seheult. 1989. Exact maximum a posteriori estimation for binary images. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 51(2):271--279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. K. Kukich. 1983. Design of a knowledge-based report generator. In Proceedings of the ACL, 145--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Kupiec, J. O. Pedersen, F. Chen. 1995. A trainable document summarizer. In Proceedings of the SIGIR, 68--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. K. R. McKeown. 1985. Text Generation: Using Discourse Strategies and Focus Constraints to Generate Natural Language Text. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. B. Pang, L. Lee. 2004. A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In Proceedings of the ACL, 271--278, Barcelona, Spain. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Parks. 1990. An intelligent stochastic optimization routine for nuclear fuel cycle design. Nuclear Technology, 89:233--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. E. Reiter, R. Dale. 2000. Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Robin. 1994. Revision-Based Generation of Natural Language Summaries Providing Historical Background. Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Rogati, Y. Yang. 2002. High-performing feature selection for text classification. In Proceedings of the CIKM, 659--661. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. R. E. Schapire, Y. Singer. 2000. Boostexter: A boosting-based system for text categorization. Machine Learning, 39(2/3):135--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. G. Sripada, E. Reiter, J. Hunter, J. Yu. 2001. A two-stage model for content determination. In Proceedings of the ACL-ENLG, 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. Tanaka-Ishii, K. Hasida, I. Noda. 1998. Reactive content selection in the generation of real-time soccer commentary. In Proceedings of the ACL/COLING, 1282--1288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. B. Taskar, P. Abbeel, D. Koller. 2002. Discriminative probabilistic models for relational data. In Proceedings of the UAI, 485--495. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Collective content selection for concept-to-text generation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image DL Hosted proceedings
        HLT '05: Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
        October 2005
        1054 pages

        Publisher

        Association for Computational Linguistics

        United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 October 2005

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        HLT '05 Paper Acceptance Rate127of402submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate240of768submissions,31%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader