skip to main content
10.5555/1572340.1572349dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbionlpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

A memory-based learning approach to event extraction in biomedical texts

Published:05 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe the memory-based machine learning system that we submitted to the BioNLP Shared Task on Event Extraction. We modeled the event extraction task using an approach that has been previously applied to other natural language processing tasks like semantic role labeling or negation scope finding. The results obtained by our system (30.58 F-score in Task 1 and 29.27 in Task 2) suggest that the approach and the system need further adaptation to the complexity involved in extracting biomedical events.

References

  1. S. Ananiadou and J. McNaught. 2006. Text Mining for Biology and Biomedicine. Artech House Books, London. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Buchholz and E. Marsi. 2006. CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proc. of the X CoNLL Shared Task, New York. SIGNLL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Bundschus, M. Dejori, M. Stetter, V. Tresp, and H-P Kriegel. 2008. Extraction of semantic biomedical relations from text using conditional random fields. BMC Bioinformatics, 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. W. C. Chou, R. T. H. Tsai, Y-S. Su, W. Ku, T-Y Sung, and W-L Hsu. 2006. A semi-automatic method for annotating a biomedical proposition bank. In Proc. of ACL Workshop on Frontiers in Linguistically Annotated Corpora 2006, pages 5--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. Collier, H. S. Park, N. Ogata, Y. Tateisi, C. Nobata, T. Sekimizu, H. Imai, and J. Tsujii. 1999. The GENIA project: corpus-based knowledge acquisition and information extraction from genome research papers. In Proc. of EACL 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. T. M. Cover and P. E. Hart. 1967. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Information Theory, 13:21--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. W. Daelemans and A. van den Bosch. 2005. Memory-based language processing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. W. Daelemans, A. Van den Bosch, and J. Zavrel. 1999. Forgetting exceptions is harmful in language learning. Machine Learning, Special issue on Natural Language Learning, 34:11--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. W. Daelemans, J. Zavrel, K. Van der Sloot, and A. Van den Bosch. 2007. TiMBL: Tilburg memory based learner, version 6.1, reference guide. Technical Report Series 07--07, ILK, Tilburg, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. D. Kim, T. Ohta, and J. Tsujii. 2008. Corpus annotation for mining biomedical events from literature. BMC Bioinformatics, 9:10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. Krallinger and A. Valencia. 2005. Text-mining and information-retrieval services for molecular biology. Genome Biology, 6:224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Krallinger, F. Leitner, C. Rodriguez-Penagos, and A. Valencia. 2008a. Overview of the protein-protein interaction annotation extraction task of BioCreative II. Genome Biology, 9(Suppl 2):S4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. Krallinger, A. Valencia, and L. Hirschman. 2008b. Linking genes to literature: text mining, information extraction, and retrieval applications for biology. Genome Biology, 9(Suppl 2):S8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. R. Morante and W. Daelemans. 2009. A metalearning approach to processing the scope of negation. In Proceedings of CoNLL 2009, Boulder, Colorado. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. Morante, W. Daelemans, and V. Van Asch. 2008. A combined memory-based semantic role labeler of English. In Proc. of the CoNLL 2008, pages 208--212, Manchester, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. C. Nédellec. 2005. Learning language in logic -- genic interaction extraction challenge. In Proc. of Learning Language in Logic Workshop 2005, pages 31--37, Bonn.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Pyysalo, F. Ginter, J. Heimonen, J. Björne, J. Boberg, J. Järvinen, and T. Salakoski. 2007. BioInfer: a corpus for information extraction in the biomedical domain. BMC Bioinformatics, 8(50).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. K. Sagae and J. Tsujii. 2007. Dependency parsing and domain adaptation with lr models and parser ensembles. In Proc. of CoNLL 2007 Shared Task, EMNLP-CoNLL, pages 82--94, Prague. ACL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Y. Sasaki, P. Thompson, P. Cotter, J. McNaught, and S. Ananiadou. 2008. Event frame extraction based on a gene regulation corpus. In Proc. of Coling 2008, pages 761--768. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. T. Wattarujeekrit, P. K. Shah, and N. Collier. 2004. PASBio: predicate-argument structures for event extraction in molecular biology. BMC Bioinformatics, 5:155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. A. Yakushiji, Y. Tateisi, Y. Miyao, and J. Tsujii. 2001. Event extraction from biomedical papers using a full parser. In Pac Symp Biocomput.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A memory-based learning approach to event extraction in biomedical texts

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image DL Hosted proceedings
          BioNLP '09: Proceedings of the Workshop on Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: Shared Task
          June 2009
          154 pages
          ISBN:9781932432442
          • Conference Chair:
          • Jun'ichi Tsujii

          Publisher

          Association for Computational Linguistics

          United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 June 2009

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate33of92submissions,36%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader