skip to main content
10.5555/1572340.1572350dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbionlpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Extraction of biomedical events using case-based reasoning

Published:05 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The BioNLP'09 Shared Task on Event Extraction presented an evaluation on the extraction of biological events related to genes/proteins from the literature. We propose a system that uses the case-based reasoning (CBR) machine learning approach for the extraction of the entities (events, sites and location). The mapping of the proteins in the texts to the previously extracted entities is carried out by some simple manually developed rules for each of the arguments under consideration (cause, theme, site or location). We have achieved an f-measure of 24.15 and 21.15 for Task 1 and 2, respectively.

References

  1. Aamodt, A.,&Plaza, E. (1994). Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches. AI Communications, 7(1), 39--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chatr-aryamontri, A., Ceol, A., Palazzi, L. M., Nardelli, G., Schneider, M. V., Castagnoli, L., et al. (2007). MINT: the Molecular INTeraction database. Nucleic Acids Res, 35(Database issue), D572--574.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kerrien, S., Alam-Faruque, Y., Aranda, B., Bancarz, I., Bridge, A., Derow, C., et al. (2007). IntAct--open source resource for molecular interaction data. Nucleic Acids Res, 35(Database issue), D561--565.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kim, J.-D., Ohta, T., Pyysalo, S., Kano, Y.,&Tsujii, J. i. (2009). Overview of BioNLP'09 Shared Task on Event Extraction. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine (BioNLP) NAACL 2009 Workshop, Boulder, CO, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kim, J. D., Ohta, T.,&Tsujii, J. (2008). Corpus annotation for mining biomedical events from literature. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Krallinger, M., Leitner, F., Rodriguez-Penagos, C.,&Valencia, A. (2008). Overview of the protein-protein interaction annotation extraction task of BioCreative II. Genome Biol, 9 Suppl 2, S4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Neves, M., Chagoyen, M., Carazo, J. M.,&Pascual-Montano, A. (2008). CBR-Tagger: a case-based reasoning approach to the gene/protein mention problem. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the BioNLP 2008 Workshop at ACL 2008, Columbus, OH, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Porter, M. (1980). An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14(3), 130--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Pyysalo, S., Ginter, F., Heimonen, J., Bjorne, J., Boberg, J., Jarvinen, J., et al. (2007). BioInfer: a corpus for information extraction in the biomedical domain. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Tsuruoka, Y., Tateishi, Y., Kim, J.-D., Ohta, T., McNaught, J., Ananiadou, S., et al. (2005). Developing a Robust Part-of-Speech Tagger for Biomedical Text. Paper presented at the Advances in Informatics - 10th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Extraction of biomedical events using case-based reasoning

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image DL Hosted proceedings
          BioNLP '09: Proceedings of the Workshop on Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: Shared Task
          June 2009
          154 pages
          ISBN:9781932432442
          • Conference Chair:
          • Jun'ichi Tsujii

          Publisher

          Association for Computational Linguistics

          United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 June 2009

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate33of92submissions,36%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader