skip to main content
10.5555/1596374.1596381dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconllConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

A metalearning approach to processing the scope of negation

Published:04 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Finding negation signals and their scope in text is an important subtask in information extraction. In this paper we present a machine learning system that finds the scope of negation in biomedical texts. The system combines several classifiers and works in two phases. To investigate the robustness of the approach, the system is tested on the three subcorpora of the BioScope corpus representing different text types. It achieves the best results to date for this task, with an error reduction of 32.07% compared to current state of the art results.

References

  1. M. Averbuch, T. Karson, B. Ben-Ami, O. Maimon, and L. Rokach. 2004. Context-sensitive medical information retrieval. In Proc. of the 11th World Congress on Medical Informatics (MEDINFO-2004), pages 1--8, San Francisco, CA. IOS Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Boytcheva, A. Strupchanska, E. Paskaleva, and D. Tcharaktchiev. 2005. Some aspects of negation processing in electronic health records. In Proc. of International Workshop Language and Speech Infrastructure for Information Access in the Balkan Countries, pages 1--8, Borovets, Bulgaria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. Buchholz and E. Marsi. 2006. CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proc. of the X CoNLL Shared Task, New York. SIGNLL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. W. W. Chapman, W. Bridewell, P. Hanbury, G. F. Cooper, and B. G. Buchanan. 2001. A simple algorithm for identifying negated findings and diseases in discharge summaries. J Biomed Inform, 34:301--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. N. Collier, H. S. Park, N. Ogata, Y. Tateisi, C. Nobata, T. Sekimizu, H. Imai, and J. Tsujii. 1999. The GENIA project: corpus-based knowledge acquisition and information extraction from genome research papers. In Proceedings of EACL-99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. T. M. Cover and P. E. Hart. 1967. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Information Theory, 13:21--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. W. Daelemans, J. Zavrel, K. Van der Sloot, and A. Van den Bosch. 2007. TiMBL: Tilburg memory based learner, version 6.1, reference guide. Technical Report Series 07-07, ILK, Tilburg, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. L. Elkin, S. H. Brown, B. A. Bauer, C. S. Husser, W. Carruth, L. R. Bergstrom, and D. L. Wahner-Roedler. 2005. A controlled trial of automated classification of negation from clinical notes. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 5(13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. I. M. Goldin and W. W. Chapman. 2003. Learning to detect negation with 'Not' in medical texts. In Proceedings of ACM-SIGIR 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Goryachev, M. Sordo, Q. T. Zeng, and L. Ngo. 2006. Implementation and evaluation of four different methods of negation detection. Technical report, DSG.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Y. Huang and H. J. Lowe. 2007. A novel hybrid approach to automated negation detection in clinical radiology reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 14(3):304--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. T. Joachims, 1999. Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning, chapter Making large-Scale SVM Learning Practical, pages 169--184. MIT-Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Lafferty, A. McCallum, and F. Pereira. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proc. of ICML 2001, pages 282--289. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. Morante, A. Liekens, and W. Daelemans. 2008. A combined memory-based semantic role labeler of english. In Proc. of the EMNLP 2008, pages 715--724, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. G. Mutalik, A. Deshpande, and P. M. Nadkarni. 2001. Use of general-purpose negation detection to augment concept indexing of medical documents. a quantitative study using the UMLS. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 8(6):598--609.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. L. Rokach, R. Romano, and O. Maimon. 2008. Negation recognition in medical narrative reports. Information Retrieval Online. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. O. Sanchez-Graillet and M. Poesio. 2007. Negation of protein-protein interactions: analysis and extraction. Bioinformatics, 23(13):424--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. G. Szarvas, V. Vincze, R. Farkas, and J. Csirik. 2008. The BioScope corpus: annotation for negation, uncertainty and their scopein biomedical texts. In Proc. of BioNLP 2008, pages 38--45, Columbus, Ohio, USA. ACL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. E. Tjong Kim Sang, S. Canisius, A. van den Bosch, and T. Bogers. 2005. Applying spelling error correction techniques for improving semantic role labelling. In Proc. of CoNLL 2005, pages 229--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Y. Tsuruoka and J. Tsujii. 2005. Bidirectional inference with the easiest-first strategy for tagging sequence data. In Proc. of HLT/EMNLP 2005, pages 467--474. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Y. Tsuruoka, Y. Tateishi, J. Kim, T. Ohta, J. McNaught, S. Ananiadou, and J. Tsujii, 2005. Advances in Informatics - 10th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, volume 3746 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, chapter Part-of-Speech Tagger for Biomedical Text, Advances in Informatics, pages 382--392. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. C. J. Van Rijsbergen. 1979. Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. V. Vincze, G. Szarvas, R. Farkas, G. Móra, and J. Csirik. 2008. The BioScope corpus: biomedical texts annotated for uncertainty, negation and their scopes. BMC Bioinformatics, 9((Suppl 11)):S9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A metalearning approach to processing the scope of negation

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image DL Hosted proceedings
              CoNLL '09: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning
              June 2009
              243 pages
              ISBN:9781932432299

              Publisher

              Association for Computational Linguistics

              United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 4 June 2009

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader