Saif Mohammad
ABSTRACT
The number of research publications in various disciplines is growing exponentially. Researchers and scientists are increasingly finding themselves in the position of having to quickly understand large amounts of technical material. In this paper we present the first steps in producing an automatically generated, readily consumable, technical survey. Specifically we explore the combination of citation information and summarization techniques. Even though prior work (Teufel et al., 2006) argues that citation text is unsuitable for summarization, we show that in the framework of multi-document survey creation, citation texts can play a crucial role.
- Shannon Bradshaw. 2003. Reference directed indexing: Redeeming relevance for subject search in citation indexes. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jaime G. Carbonell and Jade Goldstein. 1998. The use of mmr, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In Proceedings of 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 335--336, Melbourne, Australia. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aaron Elkiss, Siwei Shen, Anthony Fader, Güneş Erkan, David States, and Dragomir R. Radev. 2008a. Blind men and elephants: What do citation summaries tell us about a research article? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1):51--62. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aaron Elkiss, Siwei Shen, Anthony Fader, Güneş Erkan, David States, and Dragomir R. Radev. 2008b. Blind men and elephants: What do citation summaries tell us about a research article? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1):51--62. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Güneş Erkan and Dragomir R. Radev. 2004. Lexrank: Graph-based centrality as salience in text summarization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wesley Hildebrandt, Boris Katz, and Jimmy Lin. 2004. Overview of the trec 2003 question-answering track. In Proceedings of the 2004 Human Language Technology Conference and the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Annual Meeting (HLT/NAACL 2004).Google Scholar
- Mark Joseph and Dragomir Radev. 2007. Citation analysis, centrality, and the ACL Anthology. Technical Report CSE-TR-535-07, University of Michigan. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.Google Scholar
- Daniel Jurafsky and James H. Martin. 2008. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Speech Recognition, and Computational Linguistics (2nd edition). Prentice-Hall. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Min-Yen Kan, Judith L. Klavans, and Kathleen R. McKeown. 2002. Using the Annotated Bibliography as a Resource for Indicative Summarization. In Proceedings of LREC 2002, Las Palmas, Spain.Google Scholar
- Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Meeting of ACL, pages 423--430. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Julian Kupiec, Jan Pedersen, and Francine Chen. 1995. A trainable document summarizer. In SIGIR '95, pages 68--73, New York, NY, USA. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amy Langville and Carl Meyer. 2006. Google's PageRank and Beyond: The Science of Search Engine Rankings. Princeton University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jimmy J. Lin and Dina Demner-Fushman. 2006. Methods for automatically evaluating answers to complex questions. Information Retrieval, 9(5):565--587. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Proceedings of the ACL workshop on Text Summarization Branches Out.Google Scholar
- Qiaozhu Mei and ChengXiang Zhai. 2008. Generating impact-based summaries for scientific literature. In Proceedings of ACL '08, pages 816--824.Google Scholar
- Preslav I. Nakov, Schwartz S. Ariel, and Hearst A. Marti. 2004. Citances: Citation sentences for semantic analysis of bioscience text. In Workshop on Search and Discovery in Bioinformatics.Google Scholar
- Hidetsugu Nanba and Manabu Okumura. 1999. Towards multi-paper summarization using reference information. In IJCAI1999, pages 926--931. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hidetsugu Nanba, Takeshi Abekawa, Manabu Okumura, and Suguru Saito. 2004a. Bilingual presri: Integration of multiple research paper databases. In Proceedings of RIAO 2004, pages 195--211, Avignon, France.Google Scholar
- Hidetsugu Nanba, Noriko Kando, and Manabu Okumura. 2004b. Classification of research papers using citation links and citation types: Towards automatic review article generation. In Proceedings of the 11th SIG Classification Research Workshop, pages 117--134, Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
- Ani Nenkova and Rebecca Passonneau. 2004. Evaluating content selection in summarization: The pyramid method. Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL conference.Google Scholar
- Mark E. J. Newman. 2001. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. PNAS, 98(2):404--409.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vahed Qazvinian and Dragomir R. Radev. 2008. Scientific paper summarization using citation summary networks. In COLING 2008, Manchester, UK. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Advaith Siddharthan and Simone Teufel. 2007. Whose idea was this, and why does it matter? attributing scientific work to citations. In Proceedings of NAACL/HLT-07.Google Scholar
- Simone Teufel and Marc Moens. 2002. Summarizing scientific articles: experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Comput. Linguist., 28(4):409--445. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Simone Teufel, Advaith Siddharthan, and Dan Tidhar. 2006. Automatic classification of citation function. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 103--110, Australia. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Simone Teufel. 2005. Argumentative Zoning for Improved Citation Indexing. Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications, pages 159--170.Google Scholar
- Ellen M. Voorhees. 2003. Overview of the trec 2003 question answering track. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC 2003).Google Scholar
- David M. Zajic, Bonnie J. Dorr, Jimmy Lin, and Richard Schwartz. 2007. Multi-candidate reduction: Sentence compression as a tool for document summarization tasks. Information Processing and Management (Special Issue on Summarization). Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Using citations to generate surveys of scientific paradigms
Recommendations
Detecting and analyzing missing citations to published scientific entities
AbstractProper citation is of great importance in academic writing for it enables knowledge accumulation and maintains academic integrity. However, citing properly is not an easy task. For published scientific entities, the ever-growing academic ...
A survey on sentiment analysis of scientific citations
AbstractSentiment analysis of scientific citations has received much attention in recent years because of the increased availability of scientific publications. Scholarly databases are valuable sources for publications and citation information where ...
Google Scholar citations and Google Web-URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis
We use a new data gathering method, “Web/URL citation,” Web/URL and Google Scholar to compare traditional and Web-based citation patterns across multiple disciplines (biology, chemistry, physics, computing, sociology, economics, psychology, and ...
Comments