Abstract
The effects of burnishing and other conventional machining processes (grinding, reaming, drilling, turning, and honing) on the surface characteristic properties of mild steel were investigated and compared in terms of surface roughness, circularity (roundness), and cylindricity in this study. The effect of these processes on the microstructures was also examined to understand the relationship between the machining process and surface characteristic properties. All surface machining processes were performed under constant depth of cut, cutting speed, and feed rate. The highest hardness was obtained on the burnished surface. Experimental results also showed that the roller burnishing method is the most favorable post-machining process method for obtaining optimum surface topography on mild steel.
References
[1] F.Gharbi, S.Sghaier, K.J.Al-Fadhalah, T.Benameur: J. Mater. Eng. Perform.20 (6) (2011) 903. 10.1007/s11665-010-9701-6Search in Google Scholar
[2] L.N. Lópezde Lacalle, A.Lamikiz, J.Muñoa, J.A.Sánchez: Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.45 (15) (2005) 1659. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.03.007Search in Google Scholar
[3] M.H.El-Axir, O.M.Othman: J. Mater. Process. Technol.196 (2008).10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.028Search in Google Scholar
[4] M.H.El-Axir, O.M.Othman: J. Mater. Process. Technol.202 (2008) 435. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.040Search in Google Scholar
[5] J.Rech, H.Hamdi, S.Valette: Machining, Springer (2008) 59. 10.1007/978-1-84800-213-5_3Search in Google Scholar
[6] L.Hongyun, L.Jianying, W.Lijiang, Z.Qunpeng: J. Eng. Manuf.220 (2007) 893.Search in Google Scholar
[7] N.S.M.El-Tayeba, K.O.Lowa, P.V.Breverna: Mach. Sci. Technol.12 (2008) 234. 10.1080/10910340802067536Search in Google Scholar
[8] D.A.Stephenson, J.S.Agapiou: Metal cutting theory and practice, CRC press, 68 (2006) 52.Search in Google Scholar
[9] A.Akkurt: J. Mater. Eng. Perform.20 (6) (2011) 960. 10.1007/s11665-010-9718-xSearch in Google Scholar
[10] A.S.H.AL-Bsharat: MSc Thesis, Jordan University of Science and Technology (1994).Search in Google Scholar
[11] K.P.A.Weroński, K.Zaleski: J. Ach. Mater. Manuf. Eng.16 (2006) 144.Search in Google Scholar
[12] M.Nemat, A.C.Lyons: Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.16, (2000) 469. 10.1007/s001700070054Search in Google Scholar
[13] F.Ubeidulla, A.Al-Qawabeha: Mach. Sci. Technol.11 (2007) 145. 10.1080/10910340601172255Search in Google Scholar
[14] R.D.Srinivasa, H.H.Suresh, M.Komaraiah, U.N.Kempaiah: Mater. Manuf. Process.23 (2008) 295. 10.1080/10426910801937306Search in Google Scholar
[15] X.Fan, M.Loftus: Int. J. Process. Res.45 (2007) 899. 10.1080/00207540600632208Search in Google Scholar
[16] K.Mieczysław: J. Mater. Process. Technol.209 (2009) 625–633. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.037Search in Google Scholar
[17] K.Mieczyslaw, P.Andrzej: J. Mater. Process. Technol.210 (2010) 1217. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.03.008Search in Google Scholar
[18] N.S.M.El-Tayeb, K.O.Low, P.V.Brevern: J. Mater. Process. Technol.186 (3) (2007) 272. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.12.044Search in Google Scholar
[19] S.Thamizhmnaii, O.Bin, S.Saparudin, S.Hasan: J. Ach. Mater. Manuf. Eng.28 (2008) 139.Search in Google Scholar
[20] Y.Shu: Doctoral thesis, College of Engineering, University of Kentucky, USA (2012).Search in Google Scholar
[21] A.Akkurt, I.Ovali: Pammukkale Univ. J. Eng. Sci. (2009) 203.Search in Google Scholar
[22] A.Akkurt: 5th Int. Adv. Tech. Sym., Karabük, Turkey (2009).Search in Google Scholar
[23] A.Akkurt: J. Mater. Eng. Perform.19 (2010) 599. 10.1007/s11665-009-9513-8Search in Google Scholar
[24] I.Ovali, A.Akkurt: Mater. Manuf. Process.26 (2011) 1064. 10.1080/10426914.2010.536931Search in Google Scholar
[25] P.K.Nikunj, P.A.Kiran: Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. St., 2 (2) (2013) 53.Search in Google Scholar
[26] E.Ugur, M.K.Kulekci, S.Ozgun, Y.Kazancoglu: MP Mat. Test.3 (2013)187.Search in Google Scholar
[27] P.Nuget: Form Measurement Fundamentals, Mahr, http://www.mahr.com/, 01–60.Search in Google Scholar
© 2014, Carl Hanser Verlag, München
