Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:57:13.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of the Rate of Snow Accumulation at the Pole of Relative Inaccessibility, Eastern Antarctica: A Comparison of Glaciological and Isotopic Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

E. Picciotto
Affiliation:
Institute of Polar Studies, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, U.S.A.
R. Cameron
Affiliation:
Institute of Polar Studies, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, U.S.A.
G. Crozaz
Affiliation:
Service de Géologie et Géochimie Nucléaires, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
S. Deutsch
Affiliation:
Service de Géologie et Géochimie Nucléaires, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
S. Wiloain
Affiliation:
Service de Géologie et Géochimie Nucléaires, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rate of snow accumulation has been measured at the U.S.S.R. station situated at the Pole of Relative Inaccessibility (eastern Antarctic plateau). Five independent methods were used. The results, expressed in g cm−2 year−1, are as follows:

  1. (1) Accumulation-stake measurements show an accumulation of 3·1±0·5 in 1965. A maximum value of 3·6 for the 6–year interval 1959–65 is derived from snow-thickness measurements.

  2. (2) Firn stratigraphy was found difficult to interpret in terms of annual layers. An upper limit of 12 g cm−2 year−1 is suggested.

  3. (3) 18O/16O ratios were measured along the upper 235 cm. Assuming that each maximum in the isotope profile corresponds to a summer season, the accumulation would be 8·6±0·9.

  4. (4) Gross β radioactivity as a function of depth was measured on three firn sections. The 1955 radioactive fall-out horizon is clearly marked, enabling the derivation of an average accumulation of 3·0±0·3.

  5. (5) The average accumulation over the last 80 years, derived from the 210Pb distribution with depth, is 3·1±0·3.

A multi-annual average accumulation rate of (3·0±0·3) is thus firmly established, as well as the validity of both the 210Pb method and the 1955 radioactive fall-out horizon method. Stratigraphie studies lead to uncertain results. Oxygen isotope variations give accumulation values which are too high by a factor of two at least.

Accumulation values of the same order of magnitude (2·8±0·2) were derived from radioactive fall-out measurements at the U.S. “Plateau” station.

Détermination du taux d′accumulation de neige au Pele d′Inaccessibilité, Antarctique oriental: Comparaison des méthodes glaciologiques et isotopiques. Le taux d′accumulation de neige a été mesuré à la station U.R.S.S. du Pôle d′Inaccessibilité Relative (Antarctique oriental). Cinq méthodes indépendantes ont été appliquées. Les résultats, en g cm−2 an−1 sont les suivants: (1)

(1) Des mesures de balises, une accumulation de 3,1±0,5 a été déduite pour 1965. Des mesures d′épaisseur de neige montrent que la valeur maximum, pour l′intervalle de 6 ans 1959–65, est de 3,6.

(2)

(2) La stratigraphie du névé est difficilement interprétable en couches annuelles. Une limite supérieure de 12 g cm−2 an−1 est indiquée.

(3)

(3) Les rapports 18O/16O ont été mesurés sur une carotte de 235 cm de profondeur. En supposant que chaque maximum du profil isotopique corresponde à une saison d′été, l′accumulation serait de 8,6±0,9.

(4)

(4) L′activité β totale en fonction de la profondeur a été mesurée sur trois sections de névé. L′horizon de 1955 de retombées radioactives y apparaît clairement. II permet d′évaluer une accumulation moyenne de 3,0±0,3.

(5)

(5) L′accumulation moyenne des 80 dernières années, déduite de la distribution du 210Pb en profondeur est 3,1±0,3.

Un taux moyen d′accumulation de (3,0±0,3) portant sur plusieurs années est ainsi établi; la validité des méthodes du 210Pb et de l′horizon 1955 de retombées radioactives est également confirmée. Les études stratigraphiques aboutissent à des résultats incertains. Les variations des isotopes de l′oxygène donnent un taux d′accumulation trop élevé d′un facteur deux au moins.

Des valeurs d′accumulation du même ordre de grandeur (2,8±0,2) ont été obtenues à partir de mesures de retombées radioactives, à la station U.S.A. de “Plateau”.

Zusammenfassng

Zusammenfassng

Bestimmung der Schneeakkumulation am Pol der Unzugänglichkeit, Ost-Anterktika: Ein Vergleich glaziologischer und isotopischer Methoden. Die Schneeakkumulation wurde an der russischen Station am Pol der Unzugänglichkeit (ostantarktisches Plateau) gemessen. Es wurden fünf unabhängige Methoden angewandt. Die Ergebnisse. ausgedrückt in g cm−2 a−1, sind die folgenden: (1)

(1) Messungen an Akkutnulationspegeln zeigen 1965 einen Auftrag von 3,1±0,5. Ein Maximalwert von 3,6 für das 6-Jahre-Intervall 1959–65 ergibt sich aus Messungen der Schneedicke.

(2)

(2) Es war schwierig, die Firnstratigraphie nach Jahresschichten zu interpretieren. Als Maximalwert werden 12 g cm−2 a−1 vermutet.

(3)

(3) Das Verhältnis 18O/16O wurde in den oberen 235 cm gemessen. Vorausgesetzt, dass jedes Maximum ins isotopischen Profil einem Sommer entspricht, würde die Akkumulation 8,6±0,9 betragen.

(4)

(4) Eine grobe Messung der β-Radioaktivität als Funktion der Tiefe wurde in drei Firnproben vorgenommen. Der Horizont radioaktiven Niederschlags von 1955 konnte eindeutig festgelegt werden und ermöglichte die Bestimmung einer mittleren Akkumulation von 3,0±0,1.

(5)

(5) Die durchschnittliche Akkumulation der letzten 80 Jahre, abgeleitet aus der Tiefenverteilung von ‘Pb, ergibt 3,1±0,3.

Mit Sicherheit lässt sich so eine vieljährige mittlere Auftragsrate von 3,0±0,3 feststellen; zugleich erweist sich die Gültigkeit der 210Pb-Methode und der Bestimmung aus dem radioaktiven Horizont von 1955. Stratigraphische Untersuchungen führen zu unsicheren Resultaten. Das Verhältnis der Sauerstoffisotope liefert Akkumulationswerte, die mindestens um den Faktor 2 zu hoch sind.

Akkumulationswerte derselben Grössenordnung (2,8±0,2) ergaben sich aus Messungen des radioaktiven Niederschlages an der US-”Plateau”-Station.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1968

Introduction

In the course of the last decade, several methods have been developed for dating glacier ice or firn and for estimating snow-accumulation rates, by means of stable or radioactive isotope measurements. These methods are at various stages of development, some of them being applicable on a routine basis, others being mere suggestions.

The polar regions have provided the best field of application. Because of the absence of melting and homogenization of the snow after its deposition, the results are generally simpler to interpret. On the other hand, it is on the polar ice sheets that the isotopic methods are mostly needed, on account of the scarcity of permanent stations and of the difficulties involved in the interpretation of the firn stratigraphy.

Such measurements were included in the glaciological program of the South Pole-Queen Maud Land traverse (QMLT), a major oversnow traverse project in eastern Antarctica sponsored by the U.S. Antarctic Research Program. The general plan is to investigate the sector between the Greenwich Meridian and long. 40° E. in four summer traverses along a zig-zag route starting from the South Pole (Fig. 1). The first two legs were completed during the summer seasons 1964–65 and 1965–66. In addition to the conventional pit-stratigraphy studies, firn samples were collected at each glaciological station, approximately 50 km apart, in view of various geochemical investigations (including accumulation-rate estimates) by means of the following methods:

  • (i) Oxygen-isotope ratio variations.

  • (ii) Radioactive fall-out horizon from nuclear bomb tests.

  • (iii) 210Pb radioactive decay.

Fig. 1. Route of the Queen Maud Land traverse

Similar investigations have already been conducted at the South Pole, yielding consistent accumulation-rate values around 7 g cm−2 year−1 (Reference PicciottoPicciotto and others, 1964; Reference WilgainWilgain and others, 1965; Reference EpsteinEpstein and others, 1965) in good agreement with the value derived from stratigraphy studies (Reference GiovinettoGiovinetto, 1960; Reference GowGow, 1965) and surface measurements.

Application of these methods on the eastern Polar Plateau requires small-size samples, not at a depth greater than to m and easily obtainable with standard hand-drilling equipment.

The detailed results for the traverse will be published elsewhere. We intend to report here, mainly as a case study, the results obtained at the Pole of Relative Inaccessibility, one of the most important stations because of its geographic location.

The investigations reported here were carried out in the vicinity of the Soviet station at the Pole of Relative Inaccessibility, situated in the farthest inland and the highest and coldest zone of the Antarctic Polar Plateau, at lat. 82°07′ S., long. 55°06′ E. at an elevation of 3718 m.

The mean annual temperature, measured by the firn temperature at the depth of 25 m, is −57° C. Prevailing winds are from the north-west to north-east sector.

The station was established on 14 December 1958 by a Soviet oversnow traverse from Mirny (Reference KapitsaKapitza, 1964), and it includes a small barrack hut surrounded by various scientific equipment (see Fig. 2).

It was occupied during four short summer periods:

  • 14–26 December 1958 (U.S.S.R. traverse from Mirny).

  • 1–6 February 1964 (U.S.S.R. Vostok-Molodezhnaya traverse).

  • 27 January−2 February 1965 (U.S. Queen Maud Land traverse, part I).

  • 22 November−15 December 1965 (U.S. Queen Maud Land traverse, part II).

Fig. 2. Map of the U.S.S.R. station at the Pole of Inaccessibility (map dala from D. J. Elvers). Points of interest for the Present work are:

  • 2. Anemometer mast (USSR 1958).

  • 3. Pit No. 2, 6 m deep (QMLT II).

  • 6. Station building (USSR).

  • 8. Meteorology shelter (USSR 1958).

  • 11. Accumulation stake network (QMLT I).

  • 14. Accumulation stake line (QMLT II).

During the two stays of the Queen Maud Land traverse party at the station, sampling of firn for geochemical studies as well as pit studies and accumulation-stake measurements were carried out by two of us (E.P. and R.C.) with the assistance of Robert Behling and Olav Orrheim.

Three pits were excavated for that purpose:

  • Pit No. 1, 2 m deep, excavated on 28 January 1965, 200 m north of the station.

  • Pit No. 2, 6 m deep, excavated in December 1965, 500 m north-west of the station (point 3 of Figure 2).

  • Pit No. 3, 2 m deep, excavated in December 1965 at about 1 500 m north-west of the station on the new stake line.

Surface Measurements

Time interval December 1958–January 1965

Near the station, a meteorological study area was laid out in December 1958 and the anemometer mast and the instrument shelter remained from this installation. Small snow pits were excavated at these points, in order to reach the December 1958 surface. Using a measured density (average from the surface to a depth of 60 cm) of 0·348 g cm−3 and 14 December 1958 to 30 January 1965 as the time interval (just over 6 years), the accumulation recorded is as shown in Table I.

Table I. Snow Accumulation Recorded at the Meteorological Shelter for a 6–year Period

(December 1958–January 1965)

The value of 3·6 g cm−2 year−1 must be considered as an upper limit because of the possibility of drift-snow accumulation due to the vicinity of the station.

Time interval January-December 1965

A network of accumulation stakes was set out on 30 January 1965. It consisted of 19 bamboo poles marked with a saw cut 150 cm above the snow surface (see Fig. 2).

The stakes were re-measured twice: on 23 November and 14 December 1965. The results are given in Table II.

Table II. Snow Accumulation (cm) Measured at the Cameron Stake Network

(erected 30 January 1965)

The mean accumulation of snow between 30 January and 14 December 1965 (0·871 year) was 8·9 cm, with a standard deviation on the mean of ±1·4 cm.

Assuming, by analogy with the South Pole data (Reference Giovinetto and SchwerdtfegerGiovinetto and Schwerdtfeger, 1966; private communication from L. Aldaz), that the monthly increment is nearly constant throughout the year and using a value of 0·33 g cm−2 for the density of snow at the surface, the rate of annual accumulation is:

Firn Stratigraphy

The estimation of snow-accumulation rates from firn-stratigraphy studies relies upon the identification of annual layers. In Antarctica, since the first studies of Reference SchyttSchytt (1958) on the Maudheim Ice Shelf, a considerable amount of work has been done to define criteria for annual layering of firn in various parts of the ice sheet. Basic studies at central eastern Antarctic stations were carried out by Reference GiovinettoGiovinetto (1960) and Reference GowGow (1965) at the South Pole and by Kotiyakov (1961)

At the South Pole, according to Reference GowGow’s (1965) and to our own unpublished observations in pits dug alongside accumulation stakes, a single depth-hoar layer is generally formed every year. Deviations from this rule have been observed; nevertheless, the number of depth-hoar layers is a fair approximation of the number of years. This conclusion is also substantiated by results obtained by geochemical methods (Reference PicciottoPicciotto and others, 1964; Reference WilgainWilgain and others, 1965). Reference GiovinettoGiovinetto’s (1960) observations show that the annual stratification is still visible at depths up to 26 m.

The main features observed at the Pole of Inaccessibility are:

In the first 3 m from the surface, the firn was relatively loose and of low density, with uniform and continuous layering. It was composed essentially of massive polyhedral grains, except in the upper few centimeters where the shape and size of the original snow crystals could still be recognized.

A conspicuous feature was the rapid increase in grain-size with depth, associated with a progressive obliteration of the layered structure.

Besides abrupt changes in grain-size or in hardness, the layered appearance resulted mainly from the following features intercalated at rather irregular intervals in the firn sequence:

  • i. Depth-hoar layers, from 2 to 20 mm thick, composed of an extremely loose aggregate of elongated and cup-shaped crystals.

  • ii. Iced crusts, 0·5 to 1·0 mm thick, generally associated with a depth-hoar layer.

  • iii. Thin (0·2 to 0·5 mm) but continuous layers of hardened bonded grains.

  • iv. Very hard, dense and fine-grained layers. They were generally continuous but with variable thickness ranging from 0·5 to 15·0 cm.

Typical densities and grain-sizes are as follows:

The stratigraphic sequences in pits Nos. 1 and 2 are sketched in Figure 4. They are very difficult to interpret in terms of annual layers. The main difficulty arises from the rapid fading away of the structures with depth. On the other hand, where the layering is still well marked by crusts, depth-hoar layers, variations in grain-size or in hardness, we know little for certain about the origin of these features nor their relationship with annual periodicity.

Fig. 4. Stratigraphic sequence in pits Nos. 1 and 2. Goss β activity as a function of depth in the fisn for pits Nos.1,2 and 3

  • Cg coarse-grained

  • Fg fine-grained

  • Mg medium-grained

  • h Hard

  • m medium hard

  • s Soft

Owing to the differences in the firn properties at both locations, the criteria for annual layering successfully developed at the South Pole seem no longer applicable at the Pole of Inaccessibility. In fact, we are unable to give here any definite interpretation of the stratigraphy in terms of annual accumulation. A plausible minimum estimate of the numbers of years represented in the profiles in Figure 4 would be given by the number of well-developed depth-hoar layers (marked by black triangles). The resulting upper limits for the annual accumulation rates, using a mean density from the surface to 2 in of 0·366 g cm−3, are:

If we make the improbable assumption that each visible feature or discontinuity in the firn profiles (marked by open triangles in Figure 4) corresponds to a year, the resulting accumulation rates would be:

Oxygen Isotope Variations

The measurement of snow-accumulation rates by means of oxygen- or hydrogen-isotope ratio variations in firn and ice (Reference DansgaardDansgaard, 1954; Reference EpsteinEpstein, 1956) is based on the fact that these ratios are a function, among other factors, of the temperature at which the snow has condensed. The lower the temperature, the lower the 18O/16O and D/H ratios (Reference Epstein and MayedaEpstein and Mayeda, 1953; Reference DansgaardDansgaard, 1954; Reference BotterBotter and others, 1960; Reference PicciottoPicciotto and others, 1960; Reference LoriusLorius, 1961; Reference DansgaardDansgaard, 1964). Thus, at a given location, it is possible to distinguish snow precipitated in winter from snow precipitated in summer (Reference Gonfiantini and PicciottoGonfiantini and Picciotto, 1959; Reference EpsteinEpstein and others, 1963; Reference FriedmanFriedman and others, 1964).

As long as neither the original sequence of deposition of precipitation nor the isotopic compositions are altered, the seasonal periodicity in the firn layers will be reflected by periodic changes of the stable isotope ratios as a function of the depth, each period corresponding on average to a 1 year interval.

Accumulation rates derived from stable isotope variations were found to be in good agreement with those obtained by pit stratigraphy and stake measurements in various parts of the Greenland ice sheet (Reference Epstein and SharpEpstein and Sharp, 1959; Reference BensonBenson, 1962; Reference LangwayLangway, 1965, p. 84–128), even in deep ice where layering was no longer visible. In Antarctica, consistent results were obtained on the east coast (Reference GonfiantiniGonfiantini and others, 1963; Reference LoriusLorius, 1963). An earlier suggestion by Reference EpsteinEpstein and others (1963) that, at various locations in western Antarctica and at the South Pole, accumulation values derived from 18O/16O variations were systematically higher than values derived from pit stratigraphy, seems no longer tenable. At the South Pole, further isotope measurements made on carefully collected and statistically significant samples have given reliable accumulation values (Reference EpsteinEpstein and others, 1965; Reference WilgainWilgain and others, 1965).

To carry out oxygen-isotope ratio measurements, firn samples were collected at the Pole of Inaccessibility, along a 235 cm vertical profile in pit No. 1 in January 1965.

Two 1 m long cardboard tubes, 8 cm in diameter, were pushed down vertically in the firn. This proccedure resulted in an appreciable compaction of the order of 15 per cent. The tubes were stored well below freezing point.

The 18O /16O ratios of the melted samples were measured following procedures similar to those described by Reference Epstein and MayedaEpstein and Mayeda (1953). The results are expressed in the usual way in δ SMOW‰ relative deviation from the mean ocean water (Reference CraigCraig, 1961). They have been corrected for the various factors discussed by Reference CraigCraig (1957). The N.B.S. IA standard was used for calibration. The reproducibility of the measurements was better than 0·3‰. A plot of S values against depth is presented in Figure 3. The depths of the samples were corrected for compaction by assuming a uniform compaction rate throughout the core. Since this assumption may introduce an uncertainty of the order of 15 cm in the depth, a too detailed comparison of the isotopic profile with the stratigraphic profile reported in Figure 4 would be meaningless.

Fig. 3. Oxygen isotope ratio versus depth in pit No. 1. Presumed summer maxima are marked “s”

The δ values are seen to oscillate between −50·8 and −61·2 (the lowest value ever recorded in natural waters). The average value over the profile is −57. It must be very close to the lowest average δ value of precipitation that could be measured on the Earth’s surface. The lowest average δ recorded until now was −50 at the South Pole (Reference Epstein and SharpEpstein and Sharp, 1959).

Although the isotopic profile cannot be accurately correlated with the stratigraphy, the isotopic highs seem to correspond to depth-hoar layers, as was observed at the South Pole (Reference EpsteinEpstein and others, 1965)

Counting the number of isotopic oscillations in such a profile involves a great deal of personal interpretation. It seems, however, that to to 11 maxima (noted “s” on Figure 3) can be clearly recognized. Assuming that each peak corresponds to one summer season, the resulting accumulation rate would be 23·5±2·4 cm year−1 of snow, equivalent to 8·6±0·9 g cm−2 year−1.

Radioactive Horizon from Nuclear Explosion Debris

The possibility that radioactive fall-out from nuclear bomb tests has formed a reference horizon of glaciological interest in the polar ice sheets was suggested by Reference PicciottoPicciotto and others (1962) and Drevinsky and others (cited in Reference Sharp and EpsteinSharp and Epstein, 1962).

From a detailed study of 9°Sr and gross β-activity distribution with depth, in firn samples unambiguously dated by stratigraphic studies and 18O/16O ratio variations, Reference Picciotto and WilgainPicciotto and Wilgain (1963[a]) and Reference WilgainWilgain and others (1965) were able to show that at Base Roi Baudouin a reference level easily detectable was formed in the layer corresponding to the summer 1954–55. It is due to the sudden appearance in Antarctic precipitation of fission products released by the Castle test series in March-April 1954. The concentration of fission products in firn was shown to start rising in late 1954 and to reach a pronounced maximum in January-February 1955.

These conclusions were confirmed and extended to other Antarctic locations by Reference VickersVickers (1963), Reference WoodwardWoodward (1964) and Reference WilgainWilgain and others (1965). The existence of a similar reference horizon corresponding to a slightly earlier date was also demonstrated on the Greenland ice sheet by Reference MartellMartell (1959) and by Reference CrozazCrozaz and others (1966).

On both ice sheets, the β activity due to natural radionuclides such as 210Pb and 40K, was shown to be negligible in regard to the β activity of fission products, thus enabling an easy identification of the reference level by means of gross β activity measurements without elaborate radiochemical separations.

In order to find the depth of the radioactivity jump corresponding to about January 1955 at the Pole of Inaccessibility, gross β activity measurements were carried out on three firn sections sampled in pit No. 1 on 29 January 1965 and in pits Nos. 2 and 3 in December 1965. 5 to 20 cm thick samples were cut out of the pit walls and were stored frozen until the moment of analysis.

Gross β-activity measurements were carried out on 150 cm3 aliquots. Experimental procedures used for the 20 samples from pit No. 1 are identical to the ones described by Reference Picciotto and WilgainPicciotto and Wilgain (1963[b]). For the other samples a faster procedure based on co-precipitation of the main fission products was used; the experimental details will be given elsewhere.

The results of activity measurements are shown in Figure 4 together with the corresponding stratigraphie diagrams. They are expressed rather arbitrarily in disintegrations per minute (dpm) on the basis of a 37 per cent detection yield determined with a 40K standard. The detector background (0·2 counts per minute) and the reagent blank (0·2 counts per minute) were deduced. The standard deviation on the activity values is less than ±10 per cent for the samples above the surge point, but it may reach ±50 per cent for the samples below this level, mainly in pits Nos. 2 and 3.

The jump of β radioactivity is clearly marked in the three sections. Referring to the above-mentioned works, there is little doubt that this jump corresponds to January 1955 with an uncertainty of ±2 months. Taking into account the measured densities, the accumulation rates given in Table III were obtained. The three values are in excellent agreement and result in an average accumulation rate for the time interval 1955–66 of 3·0±0·1 g cm−2 year−1. The error represents the uncertainty in the level of the surge point due to the finite thickness of the samples.

Table III. Accumulation Rate Deduced from the Artificial Radioactivity Horizon Attributed to January 1955 (see fig. 4)

210Pb Method

210Pb, a natural β emitter, is produced in the atmosphere by the decay of 222Rn and is present in minute amounts in atmospheric precipitation. Owing to its 22 years half-life, it could be used for dating firn and ice samples back to approximately 100 years (Reference GoldbergGoldberg, 1963; Reference CrozazCrozaz and others, 1964; Reference CrozazCrozaz, unpublished).

Let

  • A0 = the 210Pb specific activity of the snow at the time of deposition,

  • Ah = the 210Pb specific activity of firn or ice at a depth h,

  • h = the depth from the surface, expressed in g cm−2 or cm of water,

  • a = the annual rate of snow accumulation in g cm−2 year−1, and

  • λ = (0·032±0·001) year−1, the radioactive constant of 210Pb.

Assuming that no migration of the 210Pb takes place in the firn, as should be the case in areas of dry snow facies, one can write:

(1)

where t is the age of a sample from depth h, age being defined here as the time elapsed since deposition on the surface.

A 0 is not known directly but, under the conditions that A 0 and a both remain constant in time, Equation (1) can be written:

(2)

These conditions are very likely to be fullfilled, when considering average values of A 0 and a over several years. A plot of Ah versus depth in a semi-logarithmic scale should yield a straight line with a slope inversely proportional to the accumulation rate and an ordinate intercept at A 0.

So far, 210Pb studies carried out in the polar ice sheets, in Antarctica (Reference CrozazCrozaz and others, 1964; Reference NezamiNezami and others, 1964; Reference PicciottoPicciotto and others, 1964) as well as in Greenland (Reference GoldbergGoldberg, 1963; Reference Crozaz and LangwayCrozaz and Langway, 1966), have yielded reliable accumulation-rate values.

Since the specific activity of the 210Pb in recently fallen snow is of the order of a few dpm/kg, low-level counting techniques have to be used. Owing to the very low energy of’ its β radiation, 210Pb is generally measured by the β activity of 210Bi (

), its first daughter. It can also be measured by the α activity of 210Po (
). This method would offer the advantage of a 10 to 50 times higher sensitivity, but so far, its use has been hampered by the lack of a suitable polonium tracer isotope thus enabling the chemical recovery yields to be checked. However, Nczami and others (1964) have obtained consistent results on samples from Terre Adélie by assuming a constant recovery yield.

The availability of the artificially made 208Po (

2·9 years; Reference SpicerSpicer, 1965) recently allowed the development of a completely reliable procedure (Reference Crozaz and FabriCrozaz and Fabri, 1966) allowing the measurement of 210Po activity on standard t m long and 8 cm diameter cores obtained with the SIPRE hand auger.

At the Pole of Inaccessibility, 210Pb measurements were carried out by both methods (210Bi after Reference CrozazCrozaz and others (1964) and 210Po after Reference Crozaz and FabriCrozaz and Fabri (1966)) on two sets of samples collected in pit No. 2 and stored in the frozen state until the analysis.

The results are given in table IV and Figure 5.

Table IV. 210Pb Activity as a Function or Depth

Fig. 5. 210Pb specific activity of firn versus depth in pit No. 2. Depth intervals of the samples are shown by horizontal arrows. The lime scale on the horizontal axis is derived from the average slope of the two straight lines

The results obtained by both methods agree within the limits of the experimental errors (Fig. 5). The resulting accumulation rates derived from equation (2) with their standard deviation are:

Conclusions

Table V summarizes the results obtained by the various methods.

  1. The surface measurements show definitely that the rate of snow accumulation at the U.S.S.R. station at the Pole of Relative Inaccessibility is close to 3 g cm−2 year−1.

  2. The 11-year average deduced from fission-products activity measurements and the 80–year average derived from the 210Pb-activity distribution with depth are in excellent agreement and are consistent with the surface measurements. The validity of these methods is thus extended to the central part of the eastern Antarctic ice sheet, where the snow accumulation is at its minimum value.

  3. Estimates based on firn stratigraphy and on oxygen-isotope variations are very uncertain and lead to erroneously high values. More detailed studies and better sampling procedures might improve the situation but, owing to the very small accumulation and the high probability of missing years in the firn sequence, it seems unlikely that reliable accumulation values at this point could be derived from any method based on the identification of annual layers.

  4. Stratigraphic interpretations are also hampered by the rapid obliteration of the firn structures. This intense metamorphism probably results from the very low accumulation associated with very steep temperature gradients and large seasonal changes in surface temperature. It is interesting to note that this metamorphism did not result in appreciable homogenization of the 18O/16O ratios in the firn. The fluctuations, as well as the absolute values, are of the order of magnitude expected from the local climatic conditions.

Table V. Annual Rate of Snow Accumulation. A Comparison of the Results

In conclusion, a multi-annual average accumulation of 3 g cm−2 year−1 is firmly established for the station at the Pole of Inaccessibility.

We have no direct information on the temporal variability of the accumulation, but our results point towards it being rather constant from year to year. This is supported by the close agreement of the 1965 value with the 6–year, 11-year and 80-year average values. Moreover, the 210Pb results (Fig. 5) indicate that the To-year average values did not vary by more than to per cent over the last 80 years.

That the accumulation rate reported here is representative of a large area of central eastern Antarctica is shown by the following evidence which has in part been extracted from unpublished data of the Queen Maud Land traverse:

  1. At the U.S. “Plateau” station (lat. 79°15′ S., long. 40°30′ E., elevation 3625 m) the gross β-activity profile (Fig. 6) gives an average annual accumulation for the interval 1955–66 of 2·8±0·2 g cm−2 year−1.

  2. At the station mile 279 of the QMLT II (lat. 82° 52′ S., long. 18° 10′ E., elevation 2610 m), the same method (Fig. 7) gives an II-year average accumulation of 3·9±0·2 g cm−2 year−1.

  3. At the U.S.S.R. station of Vostok (lat. 78° 28′ S., long. 106° 50′ E., elevation 3490 m), surface measurements in 1958 indicate an accumulation of the order of 3 g cm−2 year−1 (Reference KotlyakovKotlyakov, 1961).

Fig. 6. Gross β activity as a funaion of depth at “Plateau” station

Fig. 7. Grass β activity as a function el depth at station mile 279 of Queen Maud Land traverse II

Acknowledgements

Financial and logistic support for this work was provided by the U.S. Antarctic Research Program, National Science Foundation, through N.S.F. grants to The Ohio State University, and to the Université Libre de Bruxelles. Task Force 43 of the U.S. Navy provided invaluable logistic support in the field operations.

Financial support for the laboratory investigations was also provided by the Belgian Institut Interuniversitaire des Sciences Nucléaires and Fonds de la Recherche Collective Fondamentale (project 243).

We thank C. Weyers and A. Giuliani for their technical assistance in the laboratory. The field assistance of Robert Behling was highly appreciated.

References

Benson, C. S. 1962. Stratigraphie studies in the snow and fire of the Greenland ice sheet. U.S. Snow, Ice and Permafrost Research Establishment. Research Report 70.Google Scholar
Botter, R., and others. 1960. Sur la teneur en deutérium des précipitations en Terre de Victoria, Antarctique, par R. Botter, C. Lorius, G. Nief: Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences (Paris), Tom. 251, No. 4, p. 57375.Google Scholar
Craig, H. 1957. Isotopic standards for carbon and oxygen and correction factors for mass spectrometric analysis of carbon dioxide. Geochimica el Gasmochimica Acta, Vol. 12, Nos. 1–2, p. 13349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, H. 1961. Standard for reporting concentrations of deuterium and oxygen-18 in natural waters. Science, Vol. 133, No. 3467, p. 183334.Google Scholar
Crozaz, G. Unpublished. Mise au point d’une méthode de datation des glaciers basée sur la radioactivité du plomb-a to. [Thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1967.]Google Scholar
Crozaz, G. Fabri, P. 1966. Mesure du polonium à l’échelle de 10−13 curie, traçage par le 208Po et application A la chronologie des glaces. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 1, No. 6, p. 44648.Google Scholar
Crozaz, G. Langway, C. C. jr. 1966. Dating Greenland firn-ice cores with 210Ph. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 1, No. 4, p. 19496.Google Scholar
Crozaz, G., and others. 1964. Antarctic snow chronology with 210Pb, by G. Crozaz, E. Picciotto and W. de Breuck. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 69, No. 12, p. 2597604.Google Scholar
Crozaz, G., and others. 1966. Artificial radioactivity reference horizons in Greenland fires, by G. Crozaz, C. C. Langway, Jr., and E. Picciotto. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 4248.Google Scholar
Dansgaard, W. 1954. The O18 abundance in fresh water. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 6, Nos. 5–6, p. 24160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dansgaard, W. 1964. Stable isotopes in precipitations. Tellus, Vol. 16, No. 4, p. 43668.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. 1956. Variations of the O18/O16 ratios of fresh waters and ice. (In Nuclear processes in geologic settings. Proceedings of the second conference, Pennsylvania State University, Sept. 8–10, 1955, p. 2028. (National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council Publication 400, Nuclear Science Series, Report No. 19.))Google Scholar
Epstein, S. Mayeda, T. 1953. Variation of O18 content of water from natural sources. Geochimica ei Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 4, No. 5, p. 21324.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. Sharp, R. P. 1959. Oxygen isotope studies. Transactions. American Geophysical Union, Vol. 40, No. 1, p. 8184.Google Scholar
Epstein, S., and others. 1963. Oxygen-isotope ratios in Antarctic snow, firn and ice, by S. Epstein, R. P. Sharp and I. Goddard. Journal of Geology, Vol. 71, No. 6, p. 698720.Google Scholar
Epstein, S., and others. 1965. Six-year record of oxygen and hydrogen isotope variations in South Pole urn, by S. Epstein, R. P. Sharp and A. J. Gow. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 70, No. 8, p. 180914.Google Scholar
Friedman, I., and others. 1964. The variation of the deuterium content of natural waters in the hydrologic cycle, by I. Friedman, A. C. Redfield, B. Schoen and J. Harris. Reviews of Geophysics, Vol. 2, No. 1, p. 177224.Google Scholar
Giovinetto, M. B. 1960. Glaciology report for 1958, South Pole station. Ohio State University Research Foundation. Report 825–2–IV.Google Scholar
Giovinetto, M. B. Schwerdtfeger, W. 1966. Analysis of a 200–year snow accumulation series from the South Pole. Archiv fair Meteorologic, Geophysik und Rioklimutologie, Ser. A, Bd. 15, Ht. 2, p. 22750.Google Scholar
Goldberg, E. D. 1963. Geochronology with lead-210. (In Radioactive dating. Proceedings of the symposium on radio active dating held by the International Atomic Energy Agency in co-operation with the Joint Commission on Applied Radio activity (ICSU) in Athens, 19–23 November 1962. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency, p. 12130.)Google Scholar
Gonfiantini, R. Picciotto, E. 1959. Oxygen isotope variations in Antarctic snow samples. Nature, Vol. 184, No. 4698, p. 555758.Google Scholar
Gonfiantini, R., and others. 1963. Snow stratigraphy and oxygen isotope variations in the glaciological pit of King Baudouin station, Queen Maud Land, Antarctica, by R. Gonfiantini, V. Togliatti, E. Tongiorgi, W. de Breuck and E. Picciotto. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 68, No. 13, p. 3791−98.Google Scholar
Gow, A. J. 1965. On the accumulation and seasonal stratification of snow at the South Pole. Journal of Glaciology, VoI. 5, No. 40, p. 46777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapitsa, A. P. 1964. Priroda tsentral’noy Antarktidy . Priroda , 1964, No. 9, p. 46−56.Google Scholar
Kotlyakov, V. M. 1961. Skhema intensivnosti pitaniya lednikovogo pokrova Antarktidy . Informatsionnyy Byulleten’ Sovetskoy Antarkticheskoy Ekspeditsii , No. 25, p. 1922.Google Scholar
Langway, C. C. jr. 1965. Chemical composition studies in stratigraphie analysis of a deep ice core from Greenland. U.S. Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Research Report 77.Google Scholar
Lorius, C. 1961. Concentration en deutérium des couches de névé clans l’Antarctique. Annales de Gévphysique, Tom. 17, No. 4, p. 37887.Google Scholar
Lorius, C. 1963. Le deutérium: possibilités d’application aux problèmes de recherche concernant la neige, le névé et la glace dans l’Antarctique. CNFRA (Comité National Français des Recherches Antarctiques), No. 8.Google Scholar
Martell, E. A. 1959. Atmospheric aspects of strontium-90 fallout. Science, Vol. 129, No. 3357, p. 11971206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezami, M. and others. 1964. Mesure du taux d’accumulation de la neige au bord du continent antarctique par la méthode du plomb 210, par M. Nezami, G. Lambert, C. Lorius et J. Labeyrie. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences (Paris), Tom. 259, No. 19, p. 331922.Google Scholar
Picciotto, E. Wilgain, S. E. 1963[a]. Fission products in Antarctic snow: a reference level for measuring accumulation. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 68, No. 21, p. 596572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picciotto, E. Wilgain, S. E. 1963[b]. Produits de fission dans les neiges antarctiques; un horizon-repère pour les mesures d’accumulation. Contrat EURATOM—U.L.B.— C.N.E.N. 013–61–7 AGEC, Rapport interne, Université Libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Picciotto, E., and others. 1960. Isotopic composition and temperature of formation of Antarctic snows, by E. icciotto, X. de Maere [d’Aertrycke] and I. Friedman. Nature, Vol. 187, No. 4740, p. 85759.Google Scholar
Picciotto, E., and others. 1962. Radioactivité de l’air dans l’Antarctique en 1958 et profil radioactif entre 60° N et 70° S, par E. Picciotto, S. [E.] Wilgain, P. Kipfer et R. Boulenger. (In Radioisotopes in the physical sciences and industry. Vol. 1. Proceedings of the conference on the use of radioisotopes in the physical sciences and industry held by the International Atomic Energy Agency, with the co-operation of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, at Copenhagen, 6–17 September 1960. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency, p. 4556.)Google Scholar
Picciotto, E., and others. 1964. Rate of accumulation of snow at the South Pole as determined by radioactive measurements, by E. Picciotto, G. Crozaz and W. de Breuck. Nature, Vol. 203, No. 4943, p. 39394.Google Scholar
Schytt, V. 1958. Glaciology. II. Snow studies at Maudheim. Norwegian-British-Swedish Antarctic Expedition, 1949–52. Scientific Results, Vol. 4, A.Google Scholar
Sharp, R. P. Epstein, S. 1962. Comments on annual rates of accumulation in West Antarctica. Union Géodésique et Géophysique Internationale. Association Internationale d’Hydrologie Scientifique. Commission des Neiges et Glaces. Colloque d’Obergurgl, 10–94—18–9 1962, p. 27385.Google Scholar
Spicer, G. S. 1965. The determination of lead-210 and polonium-210 in air filters. [U.K.] Atomic Energy Research Establishment, AM-102.Google Scholar
Vickers, W. W. 1963. Geochemical dating techniques applied to Antarctic snow samples. Union Géodésique et Géophysique Internationale. Association Internationale d’Hydrologie Scientifique. Assemblée générale de Berkeley, 19–8—31–8 1963. Commission des Neiges et des Glaces, p. 199255.Google Scholar
Wilgain, S. E., and others. 1965. Strontium-90 fallout in Antarctica, by S. E. Wilgain, E. Picciotto, W. de Breuck. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 70, No. 24, p. 602332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, R. N. 1964. Strontium-90 and cwsium-137 in Antarctic snows. Nature, Vol. 204, No. 4965, p. 1291.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Route of the Queen Maud Land traverse

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Map of the U.S.S.R. station at the Pole of Inaccessibility (map dala from D. J. Elvers). Points of interest for the Present work are:2. Anemometer mast (USSR 1958).3. Pit No. 2, 6 m deep (QMLT II).6. Station building (USSR).8. Meteorology shelter (USSR 1958).11. Accumulation stake network (QMLT I).14. Accumulation stake line (QMLT II).

Figure 2

Table I. Snow Accumulation Recorded at the Meteorological Shelter for a 6–year Period(December 1958–January 1965)

Figure 3

Table II. Snow Accumulation (cm) Measured at the Cameron Stake Network(erected 30 January 1965)

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Stratigraphic sequence in pits Nos. 1 and 2. Goss β activity as a function of depth in the fisn for pits Nos.1,2 and 3Cg coarse-grainedFg fine-grainedMg medium-grainedh Hardm medium hards Soft

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Oxygen isotope ratio versus depth in pit No. 1. Presumed summer maxima are marked “s”

Figure 6

Table III. Accumulation Rate Deduced from the Artificial Radioactivity Horizon Attributed to January 1955 (see fig. 4)

Figure 7

Table IV. 210Pb Activity as a Function or Depth

Figure 8

Fig. 5. 210Pb specific activity of firn versus depth in pit No. 2. Depth intervals of the samples are shown by horizontal arrows. The lime scale on the horizontal axis is derived from the average slope of the two straight lines

Figure 9

Table V. Annual Rate of Snow Accumulation. A Comparison of the Results

Figure 10

Fig. 6. Gross β activity as a funaion of depth at “Plateau” station

Figure 11

Fig. 7. Grass β activity as a function el depth at station mile 279 of Queen Maud Land traverse II