Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

The 4 'A's test detects delirium in acutely ill patients with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 95%.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Alasdair MJ MacLullich 1,*, Susan D Shenkin 1, Steve Goodacre 2, Mary Godfrey 3, Janet Hanley 4, Antaine Stíobhairt 1, Elizabeth Lavender 3, Julia Boyd 5, Jacqueline Stephen 5,6, Christopher Weir 5,6, Allan MacRaild 7, Jill Steven 7, Polly Black 7, Katharina Diernberger 6,7, Peter Hall 5, Zoë Tieges 1, Christopher Fox 8, Atul Anand 1, John Young 9, Najma Siddiqi 10,11,12, Alasdair Gray 6,7

1 Geriatric Medicine, Division of Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
2 Emergency Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
3 Health and Social Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
4 School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
5 Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
6 Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
7 Emergency Medicine Research Group (EMERGE), NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
8 Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
9 Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
10 Psychiatry, University of York, York,
11 Hull York Medical School, York, UK
12 Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
* Corresponding author Email: a.maclullich@ed.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document