Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Text messages had a modest, statistically non-significant effect on reducing the proportion of disadvantaged men who binge drink at the 12-month follow-up.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Iain K Crombie 1,*, Linda Irvine 1, Brian Williams 2, Falko F Sniehotta 3, Dennis J Petrie 4, Claire Jones 5, John Norrie 6, Josie MM Evans 7, Carol Emslie 8, Peter M Rice 9, Peter W Slane 10, Gerry Humphris 11, Ian W Ricketts 12, Ambrose J Melson 13, Peter T Donnan 1, Andrew McKenzie 1, Li Huang 14, Marcus Achison 1

1 Division of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
2 School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
3 Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
4 Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
5 Health Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
6 Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
7 Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
8 School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
9 Division of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
10 Erskine Practice, Arthurstone Medical Centre, Dundee, UK
11 School of Medicine, Medical and Biological Sciences, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
12 School of Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
13 Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
14 Centre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
* Corresponding author Email: i.k.crombie@dundee.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions