네덜란드와 일본의 해상풍력 입지선정 절차 비교

@article{ART002788620},
author={ 임효숙 and 조공장 and 강선우 },
title={네덜란드와 일본의 해상풍력 입지선정 절차 비교},
journal={풍력에너지저널},
issn={2093-5099},
year={2021},
volume={12},
number={4},
pages={35-46},
doi={10.33519/kwea.2021.12.4.005},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.33519/kwea.2021.12.4.005}

TY - JOUR
AU - 임효숙
AU - 조공장
AU - 강선우
TI - 네덜란드와 일본의 해상풍력 입지선정 절차 비교
T2 - 풍력에너지저널
PY - 2021
VL - 12
IS - 4
PB - 한국풍력에너지학회
SP - 35-46
SN - 2093-5099
AB - This study aims to find ways to increase stakeholder acceptance of offshore wind farms in Korea by improving their implementation processes. To achieve this, the study focused on the designation procedures for offshore wind farm zones in the Netherlands and Japan. Both countries have recently reorganized their national procedures by enacting new legislation. The study compared the two countries’ procedures and investigated which roles are being assigned to governments and business operators separately, and when and how stakeholders are engaged in the consultation processes. The Netherlands showed a centralized model where the central government takes responsibility not only for site selection but also site investigation and design. Business operators come in at the construction stage. On the other hand, Japan assigned more roles to local governments. The local governments recommend possible alternatives for wind farm zones to the central government. They must also confer with a public-private consultation council before zone decisions are made to ensure stakeholder acceptance. Business operators participate from the stage of site design, which is a much earlier stage compared to the Netherlands. After an investigation of the two countries cases, the study discusses implications of the possible improved implementation processes of offshore wind farms in Korea.
KW - 민관협의, 수용성, 풍력단지개발구역, 재생에너지
DO - 10.33519/kwea.2021.12.4.005
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.33519/kwea.2021.12.4.005
ER -

임효숙 , 조공장 and 강선우 (2021). 네덜란드와 일본의 해상풍력 입지선정 절차 비교. 풍력에너지저널, 12( 4), 35- 46.

임효숙 , 조공장 and 강선우 . 2021, “네덜란드와 일본의 해상풍력 입지선정 절차 비교”, 풍력에너지저널, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 35-46. Available from: doi:10.33519/kwea.2021.12.4.005

임효숙 조공장 et al. 강선우 “네덜란드와 일본의 해상풍력 입지선정 절차 비교” 풍력에너지저널 12.4 pp. 35-46 (2021): 35.

임효숙 , 조공장 , 강선우 . 네덜란드와 일본의 해상풍력 입지선정 절차 비교 풍력에너지저널 [Internet]. 2021; 12( 4), : 35-46. Available from: doi:10.33519/kwea.2021.12.4.005

임효숙 , 조공장 and 강선우 . “네덜란드와 일본의 해상풍력 입지선정 절차 비교” 풍력에너지저널 12, no.4 (2021): 35-46. doi: 10.33519/kwea.2021.12.4.005

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

네덜란드와 일본의 해상풍력 입지선정 절차 비교

풍력에너지저널

약어 : -

2021, vol.12, no.4, pp.35 - 46

DOI : 10.33519/kwea.2021.12.4.005

발행기관 : 한국풍력에너지학회

연구분야 : 기타공학

임효숙¹ , 조공장² , 강선우³

¹고려대학교

²한국환경연구원 사회환경연구실

³게이오기주쿠대학 정책미디어연구과

인용한 논문 수 : 5 서지 간략 보기

초록

This study aims to find ways to increase stakeholder acceptance of offshore wind farms in Korea by improving their implementation processes. To achieve this, the study focused on the designation procedures for offshore wind farm zones in the Netherlands and Japan. Both countries have recently reorganized their national procedures by enacting new legislation. The study compared the two countries’ procedures and investigated which roles are being assigned to governments and business operators separately, and when and how stakeholders are engaged in the consultation processes. The Netherlands showed a centralized model where the central government takes responsibility not only for site selection but also site investigation and design. Business operators come in at the construction stage. On the other hand, Japan assigned more roles to local governments. The local governments recommend possible alternatives for wind farm zones to the central government. They must also confer with a public-private consultation council before zone decisions are made to ensure stakeholder acceptance. Business operators participate from the stage of site design, which is a much earlier stage compared to the Netherlands. After an investigation of the two countries cases, the study discusses implications of the possible improved implementation processes of offshore wind farms in Korea.

키워드

민관협의, 수용성, 풍력단지개발구역, 재생에너지

참고문헌(17)

[학위논문] Yoo, C. Y / 2020 / A Study on the Improvement of the System for Improving the Acceptability of Fishermen in the Offshore-Wind Farm
[학술지] 박재필 / 2014 / 서남해안 2.5GW 해상풍력건설사업의 지역수용성 결정요인 분석 / 글로벌경영학회지 11 (4) : 279 ~ 301
[학술지] 임효숙 / 2020 / 공공정책과 거버넌스: 네덜란드 해상풍력발전 추진 정책에 대한 거버넌스평가툴(Governance Assessment Tool)의 탐색적 적용 / 융합사회와 공공정책 14 (2) : 170 ~ 208
[기타] Netherlands Enterprise Agency / 2015 / Offshore wind energy in the Netherlands
[인터넷자료] Vermeulen, J. / Dutch offshore wind energy developments: roadmap 2023 and roadmap 2023
[인터넷자료] / Netherlands Enterprise Agency
[인터넷자료] The Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment / Policy Document on the North Sea 2016-2021
[인터넷자료] The Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment / North Sea 2050 Spatial Agenda
[학술지] de Vrees, L. / 2019 / Adaptive marine spatial planning in the Netherlands sector of the North Sea / Marine Policy
[기타] National Federation of Fisheries Cooperatives / 2019 / A case analysis on the impact of offshore wind power on the fishery industry and a study on improvement measures
[인터넷자료] Netherlands Enterprise Agency / Hollandse Kust (zuid) Wind Farm Zone: Wind Farm Sites Ⅰ&Ⅱ, Project and Site description
[학술지] KEEI / 2021 / The Japanese government announces the draft of the 6th Basic Energy Plan and the target for the country's power composition in 2030 / World Energy Market Insight 21 (15) : 1 ~ 2
[인터넷자료] KOTRA / Japan's wind power market prospects asked by experts
[인터넷자료] / Act on the Promotion of Sea Area Utilization in relation to the maintenance of offshore renewable energy generation facilities
[인터넷자료] Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry / Guidelines for Designation of Areas for Promotion of Maintenance of Marine Renewable Energy Power Generation Facilities
[인터넷자료] Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry / Guidelines for Occupation and Public Offer System Operation in General Waters
[인터넷자료] IEA-RETD / Comparative Analysis of International Offshore Wind Energy Development