Event Abstract

Predicting implicit abstract stimulus attributes from patterns of event-related potentials

  • 1 University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, Australia
  • 2 University of Cologne, Department of Psychology, Germany
  • 3 University of Melbourne, Department of Finance, Australia

Background
In everyday life, not every piece of perceived information can be processed in a conscious, deliberate fashion. Automatic brain activity below the level of conscious awareness has been linked to preferences for unattended stimuli, and can predict preference-based decisions. However, it is an open question whether automatic, attention-independent encoding is restricted to simple value judgements, or whether it also extends to more abstract stimulus characteristics. Here we investigated whether participants’ post-experiment ratings of task-irrelevant, positive background visual stimuli for the dimensions of a) arousal and b) subjective chronology (time) could be predicted from patterns of event-related potentials (ERPs) during image viewing.

Methods
64-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded from 21 participants (18-31 years) performing a demanding foreground choice-reaction task while one of 24 images (depicting objects, people and scenes) were presented in the background. After the experiment, participants rated the images with respect to a) how arousing they are, and b) how strongly they are related to the present or future. A multivariate linear support vector regression (SVR) analysis was performed to predict participants’ ratings from EEG data.

Results
The arousal and time ratings were uncorrelated (mean absolute r = .17, n.s.). No significant differences between rating increments were found for single-channel ERPs. The SVR analysis, however, showed that both arousal and time ratings could be predicted from spatiotemporal patterns of ERPs from ~200 ms post-stimulus time-windows. For the arousal rating prediction, high feature weights, indexing importance for prediction, were found for occipito-parietal channels; for the time rating prediction, high feature weights were most prominent for prefrontal channels.

Discussion
Using a novel, sensitive SVR approach, our study shows that fast, automatic brain activity reflects both arousal and subjective chronology judgements. Arousal might be tied to emotions and physical arousal, which, in turn, might explain differences in brain activity. In contrast, rating subjective chronology requires more abstract semantic judgements; however, ratings could still be decoded from ERP-patterns. Thus, we reason that an integration of several automatic evaluations of different semantic aspects of stimuli might be the basis for fast preference formation, thereby constructing a meaningful conscious experience.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Daniel Rosenblatt, Christina Van Heer, Damien Crone, Kashmira Daruwalla, Hayley McFadeyn, Alexandria Kline and Bowen Fung for support with data acquisition, data analyses and assistance. This work was supported by a University of Melbourne Faculty of Business and Economics Strategic Initiatives Grant to C.M. and S.B.

Keywords: Electroencephalography (EEG), patterns of event-related potentials, Support vector regression, abstract stimulus attributes, Preference formation

Conference: ACNS-2013 Australasian Cognitive Neuroscience Society Conference, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia, 28 Nov - 1 Dec, 2013.

Presentation Type: Poster

Topic: Executive Processes

Citation: Bode S, Bennett D, Stahl J and Murawski C (2013). Predicting implicit abstract stimulus attributes from patterns of event-related potentials. Conference Abstract: ACNS-2013 Australasian Cognitive Neuroscience Society Conference. doi: 10.3389/conf.fnhum.2013.212.00079

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 15 Oct 2013; Published Online: 25 Nov 2013.

* Correspondence: Dr. Stefan Bode, University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia, 314026@frontiersin.org