Next Article in Journal
Secondary Dentin Formation Mechanism: The Effect of Attrition
Previous Article in Journal
Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Reduces Blood Loss and Transfusion Volume in Scoliosis Surgery for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Results of a 20-Year Retrospective Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 19
10.3390/ijerph18199957
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Relationship between Weight Stigma, Physical Appearance Concerns, and Enjoyment and Tendency to Avoid Physical Activity and Sport

by
Nadia Bevan
1,
Kerry S. O’Brien
1,*,
Chung-Ying Lin
2,3,4,
Janet D. Latner
5,
Brian Vandenberg
1,
Ruth Jeanes
1,
Rebecca M. Puhl
6,
I-Hua Chen
7,
Simon Moss
8 and
Georgia Rush
1
1
School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
2
Institute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
3
Department of Public Health, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
4
Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
5
Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
6
Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
7
Chinese Academy of Education Big Data, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165, China
8
College of Health and Human Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina 0815, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(19), 9957; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199957
Submission received: 24 August 2021 / Revised: 13 September 2021 / Accepted: 16 September 2021 / Published: 22 September 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Participation in physical activity and sport is on the decline and there is a poor understanding of the psychosocial factors that contribute to people’s reluctance to participate. We examined whether there were relationships between factors such as weight stigma, weight bias internalization, appearance evaluation, and fears of negative appearance evaluations, and enjoyment and avoidance of physical activity and sport. Undergraduate students (N = 579) completed a survey assessing demographics, and the variables described above. In hierarchal multivariate regression models, weight stigma (β = −0.16, p < 0.001), appearance evaluation (β = 0.19, p = 0.001), and weight bias internalization (β = −0.19, p = 0.003) were associated with lower enjoyment of physical activity and sport. Weight stigma (β = 0.46, p = 0.001), weight bias internalization (β = 0.42, p = 0.001), and fear of negative appearance evaluations (β = 0.16, p = 0.000) were also significantly associated with the tendency to avoid physical activity and sport. Serial mediation analysis showed the relationship between weight stigma and enjoyment of physical activity and sport was through appearance evaluation and weight bias internalization (indirect effect = −0.007, SE = 0.002, 95% CI = −0.01, −0.02). Similarly, the relationship between weight stigma and avoidance of physical activity and sport was through weight bias internalization and fear of negative appearance evaluations (indirect effect = 0.11, SE = 0.03, 95% CI = 0.05, 0.16). These results suggest that weight stigma and concerns about one’s physical appearance influence people’s enjoyment and reasoning for avoiding physical activity and sport. Research is needed to identify ways to reduce body-related stigma and increase enjoyment and participation in physical activity and sport.

1. Introduction

Regular participation in physical activity and sport is important for the prevention of numerous mental and physical health conditions [1,2]. For example, people who regularly participate in formal exercise or sport are less likely to develop type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease, obesity, major depression and anxiety disorders, and some cancers [3]. Accordingly, public health experts and governments have been trying to increase regular participation in physical activity and sport for over three decades. Despite increased research, public health efforts, and investment by governments, participation in physical activity and sport continues to decline in most Western nations, and solutions for addressing this problem have not been identified [4,5,6,7].
Research on the role of various environmental and socio-economic factors suggests that high cost, poor accessibility, and lack of leisure time are barriers to physical activity and sport participation [8,9]. However, little research has examined the relationship between psychosocial influences such as weight-related stigma, physical appearance-related concerns (body image, fear of negative appearance evaluations) and enjoyment and avoidance of physical activity and sport [10,11]. Previous research suggests that higher rates of perceived weight stigma (e.g., teasing, negative verbal commentary) may be related to exercise avoidance in people with higher body weight [12,13]. For example, Vartanian and colleagues [14,15] found that experiences of weight stigma were associated with decreased motivation to exercise. This relationship may be particularly evident in women who have significantly lower levels of physical activity, sport participation, and exercise intentions, and higher rates of body dissatisfaction [6,16]. Weight stigma has also been found to be associated with lowered physical activity intention among young adults [10,17]. Similarly, research by Jackson and Steptoe [18] found that weight-based discrimination was reported as a barrier to physical activity, independent of body mass index (BMI) [19].
Experiences of weight stigma (e.g., teasing, negative verbal comments) and internalized weight stigma (e.g., self-stigma and blame, weight bias internalization, disgust) have been found to be associated with negative psychological outcomes, including greater body dissatisfaction, anxiety, depression [20,21,22,23,24], and poorer physical health [25]. Internalized weight stigma in particular has been found to be consistently associated with poorer health outcomes (e.g., weight gain, poorer psychosocial well-being) [26]. Related research also suggests that appearance-related concerns (e.g., body image) have a role in exercise avoidance [11], with appearance-related concerns associated with less motivation to exercise [27]. However, little research has examined the relationships between weight stigma, appearance related concerns, and enjoyment or avoidance of physical activity and sport. Specifically, it is unknown whether the relationship between experiences of weight stigma and enjoyment and avoidance of physical activity and sport are mediated by factors such as weight bias internalization, appearance-related concerns, and/or fear of negative appearance evaluations.
Although there is no research directly examining these interrelationships, previous research suggests that such relationships may exist. For example, a cross-sectional study found that experiences of weight stigma and weight stigma internalization were related to less exercise and lower exercise self-efficacy, respectively, and the relationship between weight stigma experiences and exercise was mediated by weight stigma internalization [12]. Vartanian and colleagues [28] similarly found significant relationships between body image concerns and motivation to exercise. Research examining fear of negative appearance evaluation and body image avoidance also suggests that concerns about one’s physical appearance and internalized weight stigma [12] may be related to avoidance of settings involving appraisals of one’s physical appearance (e.g., physical activity and sport). Research on the enjoyment of sport also suggests that there is a relationship between affect regarding sport and continued participation in sport [29].
This exploratory study examines potential relationships between weight stigma, weight stigma internalization, appearance-related concerns, and tendency to avoid participation in physical activity and sport and enjoyment of physical activity and sport. We also sought to examine whether relationships between weight stigma and tendency to avoid participation in physical activity and sport and enjoyment is mediated by appearance-related concerns.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Undergraduate students (N = 647) were invited to participate in the study in return for course credit. The majority (89.7%; N = 581) agreed to participate and provided responses to the survey. Two students provided no response to a question assessing their sex, leaving N = 579 students for inclusion in analyses. Post-hoc power calculations suggested the sample size was sufficient to provide >90% power to detect a small effect (0.2) at the 0.05 level of significance. Mean age of the sample was 19.8 years, with a standard deviation of 2.3 years. The majority of the sample were women (N = 428; 73.8%). Participant BMI (kg/m2) was calculated from self-reported weight and height (M = 22.5 kg/m2, SD = 3.44), with BMI’s ranging from 14.9 to 38.7. Approximately 10.2% of respondents were categorized as “underweight” by BMI (BMI < 18.5), 71.5% as “normal range” (BMI = 18.52–4.9), 14.3% as “overweight” (BMI = 25–29.9), and 3.5% as “obese” (BMI ≥ 30) [30]. Three participants were excluded from analysis as they did not provide height and/or weight information. We asked participants to provide their ethnicity via an open-ended written response. Approximately, 34% of participants specifically used the word white when defining their ethnicity. An additional 40% identified as having an Asian background, and 26% identified their country of origin (e.g., citizen status) rather than an ethnicity per se.
We collected demographic characteristics (age, sex, and weight and height) and administered measures of weight stigma, weight stigma internalization, appearance evaluation, fear of negative appearance evaluation, enjoyment of physical activity and sport, and the tendency to avoid physical activity and sport. Ethical approval was obtained from the host university’s ethics panel (ID: 8912).

2.2. Weight Stigma

Consistent with previous research [22,31], we used the modified five-item Perception of Teasing Scale [32] to measure weight stigma. Scale items have two parts, the first assessing frequency of teasing about weight, the second assessing how much the teasing hurt. Participants first rate how often they were teased in the past 12 months about their weight using a 5-point scale, where 1 = “never” and 5 = “very often”, and then how upset the teasing made them feel (1 = “not upset” and 5 = “very upset”). Participants responding 1 (“never”) to the first part of the question assessing frequency, had the second half of the item assessing level of upset coded as a 0. The items from the original scale were modified slightly to be relevant to all weight categories. Instead of using the term “heavy”, the term “weight” was inserted in items so as to be applicable to participants of diverse weight categories. For example, the first item in the original scale asked participants to rate how often “People made fun of you because you were heavy”, whereas, in the modified scale this item stated, “People make fun of you because of your weight” [22]. The weight stigma frequency and upset items were highly correlated with one another (rs = 0.82 to 0.84), and an examination of factor structure showed a single factor (eigen value = 6.84). Accordingly, a weight stigma score was calculated by combining the total of the weight stigma-frequency and upset components and dividing by two. Cronbach’s alpha for the measure in this sample was 0.93. Weight stigma scores ranged from 2.5 to 25, with higher scores indicating greater weight stigmatization.

2.3. Weight Bias Internalisation

Weight stigma internalization was measured using the 11 item Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS) [33], modified to use the term “weight” instead of “overweight” [34] to be applicable to participants of diverse body sizes. This scale assesses the degree to which people accept and internalize negative weight-related messages, stereotypes, and attitudes. Participants are asked to indicate the extent to which they agree with statements about themselves (e.g., “My weight is a major way that I judge my value as a person”) using a 7-point scale (1 = “strongly disagree” and 7 = “strongly agree”). A mean score of all 11 items is calculated for each participant, with WBIS scores ranging from 1 and 7, with higher scores indicating greater weight bias internalization. Cronbach’s alpha for the present study was 0.93.

2.4. Appearance Evaluation

We used the appearance evaluation scale of the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire [35] to assess participants’ feelings and perceptions of their own physical attractiveness (body image). The scale has 7 items, and participants indicate their agreement with statements such as, “My body is sexually appealing” using a scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Cronbach’s alpha for the appearance evaluation scale was 0.85. Higher scores on this scale indicate greater satisfaction with one’s physical appearance.

2.5. Fear of Negative Appearance Evaluation

The Fear of Negative Appearance Evaluation Scale (FNAE) [36] is a 6-item scale assessing people’s fear or worry regarding the potential of others to make evaluations of their physical appearance. Participants were asked to answer what comes closest to how they feel (e.g., “It bothers me if I know someone is judging my physical shape”) using a 5-point scale (1 = “not at all” and 5 = “extremely”). Cronbach’s alpha for the present study was 0.94.

2.6. Enjoyment of Physical Activity and Sport

The Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale [37,38] was used to assess enjoyment of physical activity and sport. Originally, an 18-item measure, subsequent research identified a modified 16-item version showing a single factor measure of enjoyment of physical activity [38]. A limitation of the measure is that it assesses one specific activity (e.g., tennis) and at that current point in time, instead of assessing enjoyment of physical activity, exercise or sport across a number of activities. Accordingly, we modified the opening statement introducing the scale to: “The following scale asks about how you generally feel when you are engaged in physical exercise for fitness and health (e.g., running, playing sport, going to the gym). Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with each statement below.” Consistent with previous research [38], a 5-point Likert scale was used to indicate participants agreement and disagreement (1 = totally agree to 5 = totally disagree) with the 16 statements assessing level of enjoyment (e.g., I enjoy it; It frustrates me; I get something out of it). Higher mean scores indicate more enjoyment when engaged in physical exercise and sport. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the scale retained a factor solution for enjoyment (eigen value = 8.87). Similarly, scale internal consistency was good (α = 0.94).

2.7. Tendency to Avoid Physical Activity and Sport

Because there is no existing measure assessing the Tendency to Avoid Physical Activity and Sport (TAPAS) due to weight or appearance related concerns, we developed a 10-item scale to assess this construct [39]. This scale included items such as “I avoid participating in sport because of my fear of being judged about my physical appearance” and “I avoid physical activity because I don’t like how my body looks when exercising”. Participants indicated their agreement or disagreement using a five-point scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a single factor solution for the scale (eigen value = 7.43) with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.95. The scores from ten items of the TAPAS are summed to provide a scale score ranging from 10–50, with higher scores indicating greater avoidance of physical activity and sport.

2.8. Analysis

Independent t-tests were used to examine mean differences between men and women on the variables of interest. We examine differences between men and women because of literature demonstrating consistent sex differences in body image, weight stigma, and participation in sport. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to examine simple bivariate relationships. Hierarchical multivariate linear regression models were used to test relationships between variables of interest and enjoyment of physical activity and sport, and avoidance of physical activity and sport, respectively. In the first model (step) of regression models, we entered age, sex, and BMI. Weight stigma experiences was entered in the second model, and appearance evaluation and weight stigma internalization in the third model. Fear of negative appearance evaluation was added in a final model 4. The PROCESS macro (Model 6) for SPSS (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) was used to run serial mediation analyses [40]. We report coefficients and mediation for all models. Statistical significance was set at the < 0.05 level. Note, exploratory moderated mediation analysis with sex and BMI as moderators and the pattern of results did not vary as a function of sex or BMI.

3. Results

As can be seen in Table 1, women reported significantly higher weight stigma, WBIS, and FNAE scores than men. Women also reported significantly lower appearance evaluation, enjoyment of physical activity and sport, and higher levels of tendency to avoid physical activity and sport.

3.1. Bivariate Analyses

Table 2 displays the correlation coefficients for the variables of interest. For both men and women, weight stigma, WBIS, appearance evaluation, FNAE, enjoyment of physical activity and sport, and tendency to avoid physical activity and sport were all significantly correlated with each other. Higher levels of weight stigma, weight bias internalization, and fear of negative appearance evaluation were associated with lower enjoyment of physical activity and sport, and greater tendency to avoid physical activity and sport. Lower appearance evaluation scores were associated with lower enjoyment and with higher tendency to avoid physical activity and sport.

3.2. Regression Models

The results of the hierarchical multivariate regression analyses are displayed in Table 3. All models explained significant amounts of variance in enjoyment of physical activity and sport, and tendency to avoid physical activity and sport scores (ps < 0.0001). For enjoyment of physical activity and sport, sex was the only significant predictor in the first model. In the second model, weight stigma explained a significant additional proportion of variance in enjoyment scores. The entry of appearance evaluation and WBIS in a third model explained an additional 8% of variance in enjoyment of physical activity and sport. However, weight stigma was no longer a significant predictor, suggesting that the relationship between weight stigma and enjoyment of physical activity and sport is explained by appearance evaluations and weight stigma internalization. Additionally, the relationship between sex and enjoyment of physical activity and sport was reduced in the presence of appearance evaluation and WBIS scores. In the final model, entry of FNAE did not explain any additional variance in enjoyment of physical activity and sport scores.
For the tendency to avoid physical activity and sport, age, sex, and BMI accounted for 10% of the variance in the first model, with sex and BMI as significant predictors of the tendency to avoid physical activity and sport scores. In the second model, the addition of weight stigma accounted for an additional 20% of the variance in avoidance scores. In the third model, appearance evaluation and WBIS accounted for another 14% of the variance in the tendency to avoid physical activity and sport scores. However, appearance evaluation was not a significant predictor. In the final model, entry of FNAE accounted for a small but significant additional proportion of variance in avoidance of physical activity and sport scores.

3.3. Mediation Analysis

Mediation models controlling for age, sex, and BMI examined the role of appearance evaluation, weight bias internalization, and fear of negative appearance evaluation in mediating the relationship between weight stigma and enjoyment and tendency to avoid physical activity and sport. The mediation models only included the mediation variables that were initially significant in the multivariate regression models (Table 3). Table 4 displays the results of the two serial mediation analyses. Both mediation models were statistically significant and accounted for differences in age, BMI, and sex (p < 0.001). The first model tested whether the relationship between weight stigma and enjoyment of physical activity and sport was through appearance evaluation and WBIS (Figure 1). All paths indicated in Figure 1 were significant, and there was a significant indirect path through appearance evaluation and WBIS (coefficient = −0.007, SE = 0.002, 95% CI = −0.01, −0.02) indicating serial mediation. That is, the relationship between weight stigma and enjoyment of physical activity and sport was through appearance evaluation and WBIS. The second mediation model (Figure 2) examined whether WBIS and FNAE mediated the relationship between weight stigma and the tendency to avoid physical activity and sport. Again, there was a significant indirect path through WBIS and FNAE (coefficient = 0.11, SE = 0.03, 95% CI = 0.05, 0.16), confirming that the relationship between weight stigma and the tendency to avoid physical activity and sport is through WBIS and FNAE (serial mediation).

4. Discussion

Participation in physical activity and sport is important for the physical, social, and mental wellbeing of the general public, yet participation has been declining for several decades. The present exploratory study sought to better understand the psychosocial factors that may help explain why people may not enjoy or seek to avoid participating in physical activity and sport. Previous research in this area had found a relationship between weight stigma and exercise avoidance [16,41]; however, no work has assessed the potential psychosocial factors underpinning the relationship between weight stigma and enjoyment or tendency to avoid physical activity and sport. Accordingly, the present exploratory study addresses this gap by examining the relationships between weight stigma and appearance-related concerns and enjoyment and tendency to avoid physical activity and sport.
This study found that weight stigma, weight stigma internalization and appearance evaluation were all associated with lower enjoyment of, and tendency to avoid, physical activity and sport. Additionally, fear of negative appearance evaluation was associated with the tendency to avoid physical activity and sport, but not with the enjoyment of physical activity and sport after accounting for all other variables in models. Furthermore, the relationship between weight stigma and enjoyment of physical activity and sport was mediated by body image (appearance evaluation) and weight bias internalization. The serial mediation analysis showed that experiences of weight stigma were associated with lower appearance evaluation, which was associated with greater weight bias internalization, which in turn was associated with less enjoyment of physical activity and sport. Similarly, mediation analyses showed that greater weight stigma experience was associated with greater weight bias internalization, which was associated with greater fears of negative appearance-related evaluations, which was related to tendency to avoid physical activity and sport scores.
Consistent with previous research, weight bias internalization had a stronger relationship with lower enjoyment and tendency to avoid physical activity and sport than did experiences of weight stigma [42]. This suggests that weight stigma experiences may drive negative thoughts about one’s own weight (weight stigma internalization), which then underpin lower enjoyment of physical activity and sport and tendency to avoid physical activity and sport. This is an important finding as it suggests that not everyone who encounters weight stigma will develop other negative psychosocial and behavioral sequela, but those who internalize such stigmatizing comments and behaviors may encounter these negative outcomes. However, our findings appear to suggest that if negative verbal comments and teasing about weight are internalized by the individual, then the impact of weight stigma is amplified. This also suggests that there may be a window for intervention following experiences of stigma to reduce its impact. For example, acceptance commitment therapy shows promise in this regard, but more research on the effectiveness of this sort of approach is needed [43]. Research is also needed to identify why some individuals may be more prone to internalizing weight stigma, and who is at greatest risk for internalization and its negative implications for engagement in physical activity and sport [12].
It is also worth noting that those with greater appearance evaluation reported lower enjoyment of physical activity and sport. But again, enjoyment also appears to be related to experiences of being stigmatized about one’s appearance or weight. Similarly, fear of negative appearance-related evaluations from others was related to the tendency to avoid physical activity and sport, but not to enjoyment of physical activity and sport. It may be that individuals enjoy physical activity and sport once they are engaged in the activity, but fear of being negatively judged about their appearance acts as a potential barrier to participating.
These findings reiterate the need for inclusive physical activity and sport policy and weight stigma interventions, particularly those that target the internalization of negative weight-related commentary. Previous research has discussed the importance of policies to reduce weight-based discrimination [44,45], with the aim of making weight stigma less socially acceptable [46]. Our findings indicate the importance of targeting physical activity and sport settings as part of these efforts. More broadly, our findings support calls for public health approaches to develop and support environments that encourage health-promoting behaviors for people across diverse weights and body sizes. Current public health approaches and messaging to increase people’s physical activity levels typically focus on weight status (e.g., obesity, overweight) and associated health consequences of poor diet and exercise, which by association can increase weight stigma [47].
There are limitations to the present research. The cross-sectional design of the study prohibits strong causal inferences regarding the pathways between weight stigma and enjoyment and tendency to avoid physical activity and sport. A longitudinal study would be optimal to test causal relationships between weight stigma, enjoyment, and tendency to avoid physical activity and sport, especially given that the onset of weight stigma experiences can occur very early in life [48]. Related work by others does suggest that the relationships identified in the present study are likely to be present in longitudinal research [49,50]. The age of the sample is relatively homogenous with the majority of the sample consisting of young adults. Body image concerns and related constructs tend to decrease over time and may have less predictive power in older adults [51,52]. Future research should include samples of older individuals to understand if the relationships observed here are present in later life. Weight stigma was also not assessed within the specific context of physical activity and sport, which should be examined in future research. Finally, the present study focused on experiences and feelings about participating in physical activity and sport rather than participation and physical activity behaviors per se. However, it seems reasonable to expect that those reporting not enjoying, and wanting to avoid, physical activity and sport will be less likely to participate in it.

5. Conclusions

Notwithstanding the limitations, the study results suggest that enjoyment and the tendency to avoid physical activity and sport are related to experienced and internalized weight stigma, appearance evaluations, and fear of negative appearance evaluations. Further research is required, such as longitudinal studies, which can better examine the causal relationships between weight stigma, weight stigma internalization, appearance evaluations, fear of negative appearance evaluation, and enjoyment and tendency to avoid physical activity and sport. Interventions to understand the causal relationships between these variables would further assist research in the psychological and public health fields in understanding what can be done to reduce physical activity and sport avoidance. Understanding the psychosocial barriers to physical activity and sport is key for improving the population’s engagement and adherence to these activities, and to improving the social, mental, and physical well-being of the population.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.S.O., J.D.L., R.M.P., and N.B.; Methodology, K.S.O., J.D.L., and N.B.; Formal analysis, N.B., K.S.O., S.M., and B.V.; Investigation, N.B. and K.S.O.; Writing—original draft preparation, N.B., K.S.O., J.D.L., and B.V.; Writing—review and editing, C.-Y.L., I-H.C., R.M.P., S.M., G.R., and R.J.; Supervision, K.S.O., R.J., and B.V.; Project administration, K.S.O.; Funding acquisition, K.S.O.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Monash University (Project ID: 8912).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data from the present study can be requested from the corresponding author Kerry O’Brien ([email protected]).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Warburton, D.E.; Nicol, C.W.; Bredin, S.S. Health benefits of physical activity: The evidence. Cmaj 2006, 174, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Haskell, W.L.; Lee, I.M.; Pate, R.R.; Powell, K.E.; Blair, S.N.; Franklin, B.A.; Macera, C.A.; Heath, G.W.; Thompson, P.D.; Bauman, A. Physical activity and public health: Updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation 2007, 116, 1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Durstine, J.L.; Gordon, B.; Wang, Z.; Luo, X. Chronic disease and the link to physical activity. J. Sport Health Sci. 2013, 2, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Guthold, R.; Stevens, G.A.; Riley, L.M.; Bull, F.C. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 19 million participants. Lancet Glob. Health 2018, 6, e1077–e1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Guthold, R.; Stevens, G.A.; Riley, L.M.; Bull, F.C. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: A pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 16 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2020, 4, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hallal, P.C.; Andersen, L.B.; Bull, F.C.; Guthold, R.; Haskell, W.; Ekelund, U. Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. Global physical activity levels: Surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 2012, 380, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Weed, M. Should we privilege sport for health? The comparative effectiveness of UK government investment in sport as a public health intervention. Int. J. Sport Policy Politics 2016, 8, 559–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Somerset, S.; Hoare, D.J. Barriers to voluntary participation in sport for children: A systematic review. BMC Pediatrics 2018, 18, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Humpel, N.; Owen, N.; Leslie, E. Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity: A review. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2002, 22, 188–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vartanian, L.R.; Pinkus, R.T.; Smyth, J.M. Experiences of weight stigma in everyday life: Implications for health motivation. Stigma Health 2018, 3, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. More, K.R.; Phillips, L.A.; Colman, M.H. Evaluating the potential roles of body dissatisfaction in exercise avoidance. Body Image 2019, 28, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Pearl, R.L.; Puhl, R.M.; Dovidio, J.F. Differential effects of weight bias experiences and internalization on exercise among women with overweight and obesity. J. Health Psychol. 2015, 20, 1626–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schvey, N.A.; Sbrocco, T.; Bakalar, J.L.; Ress, R.; Barmine, M.; Gorlick, J.; Pine, A.; Stephens, M.; Tanofsky-Kraff, M. The experience of weight stigma among gym members with overweight and obesity. Stigma Health 2017, 2, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rodgers, R.; Chabrol, H.; Paxton, S.J. An exploration of the tripartite influence model of body dissatisfaction and disordered eating among Australian and French college women. Body Image 2011, 8, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cheng, O.Y.; Yam, C.L.; Cheung, N.S.; Lee, P.L.; Ngai, M.C.; Lin, C.Y. Extended theory of planned behavior on eating and physical activity. Am. J. Health Behav. 2019, 43, 569–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vartanian, L.R.; Shaprow, J.G. Effects of weight stigma on exercise motivation and behavior: A preliminary investigation among college-aged females. J. Health Psychol. 2008, 13, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fung, X.C.; Pakpour, A.H.; Wu, Y.K.; Fan, C.W.; Lin, C.Y.; Tsang, H.W. Psychosocial variables related to weight-related self-stigma in physical activity among young adults across weight status. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Jackson, S.E.; Steptoe, A. Association between perceived weight discrimination and physical activity: A population-based study among English middle-aged and older adults. BMJ Open 2017, 7, e014592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Phibbs, S.; Thorburn, S.; Branscum, A.J. Is weight discrimination associated with physical activity among middle aged and older adults? J. Prim. Prev. 2019, 40, 279–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Alimoradi, Z.; Golboni, F.; Griffiths, M.D.; Broström, A.; Lin, C.Y.; Pakpour, A.H. Weight-related stigma and psychological distress: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 39, 2001–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. O’Brien, K.S.; Daníelsdóttir, S.; Ólafsson, R.P.; Hansdóttir, I.; Fridjónsdóttir, T.G.; Jónsdóttir, H. The relationship between physical appearance concerns, disgust, and anti-fat prejudice. Body Image 2013, 10, 619–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. O’Brien, K.S.; Latner, J.D.; Puhl, R.M.; Vartanian, L.R.; Giles, C.; Griva, K.; Carter, A. The relationship between weight stigma and eating behavior is explained by weight bias internalization and psychological distress. Appetite 2016, 102, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Puhl, R.M.; Brownell, K.D. Confronting and coping with weight stigma: An investigation of overweight and obese adults. Obesity 2006, 14, 1802–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Puhl, R.M.; Heuer, C.A. The stigma of obesity: A review and update. Obesity 2009, 17, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hunger, J.M.; Tomiyama, A.J. Weight labeling and obesity: A longitudinal study of girls aged 10 to 19 years. JAMA Pediatrics 2014, 168, 579–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Pearl, R.L.; Puhl, R.M.; Himmelstein, M.S.; Pinto, A.M.; Foster, G.D. Weight stigma and weight-related health: Associations of self-report measures among adults in weight management. Ann. Behav. Med. 2020, 54, 904–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pila, E.; Barlow, M.A.; Wrosch, C.; Sabiston, C.M. Comparing the body to superior others: Associations with daily exercise and body evaluation in men and women. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2016, 27, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vartanian, L.R.; Pinkus, R.T.; Smyth, J.M. The phenomenology of weight stigma in everyday life. J. Contextual Behav. Sci. 2014, 3, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Scanlan, T.K.; Carpenter, P.J.; Simons, J.P.; Schmidt, G.W.; Keeler, B. An introduction to the sport commitment model. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 1993, 15, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic; (WHO Technical Report Series 894); World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  31. Simone, M.; Hooper, L.; Eisenberg, M.E.; Neumark-Sztainer, D. Unhealthy weight control behaviors and substance use among adolescent girls: The harms of weight stigma. Soc. Sci. Med. 2019, 233, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Thompson, J.K.; Cattarin, J.; Fowler, B.; Fisher, E. The perception of teasing scale (POTS): A revision and extension of the physical appearance related teasing scale (PARTS). J. Personal. Assess. 1995, 65, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Durso, L.E.; Latner, J.D. Understanding self-directed stigma: Development of the weight bias internalization scale. Obesity 2008, 16, S80–S86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pearl, R.L.; Puhl, R.M. Measuring internalized weight attitudes across body weight categories: Validation of the modified weight bias internalization scale. Body Image 2014, 11, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cash, T.F. The multidimensional body-self relations questionnaire. Old Dominion University: Norfolk, VA, USA, 1990; Unpublished test manual. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lundgren, J.D.; Anderson, D.A.; Thompson, J.K. Fear of negative appearance evaluation: Development and evaluation of a new construct for risk factor work in the field of eating disorders. Eating Behav. 2004, 5, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kendzierski, D.; DeCarlo, K.J. Physical activity enjoyment scale: Two validation studies. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 1991, 13, 50–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Motl, R.W.; Dishman, R.K.; Saunders, R.; Dowda, M.; Felton, G.; Pate, R.R. Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in adolescent girls. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2001, 21, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bevan, N.; O’Brien, K.S. Tendency to avoid physical activity and sport scale: Development of a scale to measure weight stigma and appearance-related concerns. Under Review.
  40. Hayes, A.F.; Preacher, K.J. Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 2014, 67, 451–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vartanian, L.R.; Novak, S.A. Internalized societal attitudes moderate the impact of weight stigma on avoidance of exercise. Obesity 2011, 19, 757–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pearl, R.L.; Puhl, R.M. The distinct effects of internalizing weight bias: An experimental study. Body Image 2016, 17, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Griffiths, C.; Williamson, H.; Zucchelli, F.; Paraskeva, N.; Moss, T. A systematic review of the effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for body image dissatisfaction and weight self-stigma in adults. J. Contemp. Psychother. 2018, 48, 189–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Pearl, R.L. Weight bias and stigma: Public health implications and structural solutions. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 2018, 12, 146–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Puhl, R.M.; Latner, J.D.; O’Brien, K.; Luedicke, J.; Daníelsdóttir, S.; Forhan, M. A multinational examination of weight bias: Predictors of anti-fat attitudes across four countries. Int. J. Obes. 2015, 39, 1166–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Puhl, R.M.; Brownell, K.D. Psychosocial origins of obesity stigma: Toward changing a powerful and pervasive bias. Obes. Rev. 2003, 4, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. O’Brien, K.S.; Puhl, R.M.; Latner, J.D.; Lynott, D.; Reid, J.D.; Vakhitova, Z.; Hunter, J.A.; Scarf, D.; Jeanes, R.; Bouguettaya, A.; et al. The effect of a food addiction explanation model for weight control and obesity on weight stigma. Nutrients 2020, 12, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Ruffman, T.; O’Brien, K.S.; Taumoepeau, M.; Latner, J.D.; Hunter, J.A. Toddlers’ bias to look at average versus obese figures relates to maternal anti-fat prejudice. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 2016, 142, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Neumark-Sztainer, D.; Paxton, S.J.; Hannan, P.J.; Haines, J.; Story, M. Does body satisfaction matter? Five-year longitudinal associations between body satisfaction and health behaviors in adolescent females and males. J. Adolesc. Health 2006, 39, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Neumark-Sztainer, D.; Wall, M.; Eisenberg, M.E.; Story, M.; Hannan, P.J. Overweight status and weight control behaviors in adolescents: Longitudinal and secular trends from 1999 to 2004. Prev. Med. 2006, 43, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Knight, T.; Illingworth, K.; Ricciardelli, L. Health implications of body size perception and weight tolerance in older adults. J. Health Psychol. 2009, 14, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tiggemann, M. Body image across the adult life span: Stability and change. Body Image 2004, 1, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijerph 18 09957 g001 550
Figure 1. Conceptual Mediation Model. Indirect effect of weight stigma on enjoyment of physical activity and sport through body image only = a1, b1; indirect effect of weight stigma on enjoyment of physical activity and sport through body image and weight bias internalization in serial = a1, d12, b2; direct effect on weight stigma of enjoyment of physical activity and sport = c1.
Figure 1. Conceptual Mediation Model. Indirect effect of weight stigma on enjoyment of physical activity and sport through body image only = a1, b1; indirect effect of weight stigma on enjoyment of physical activity and sport through body image and weight bias internalization in serial = a1, d12, b2; direct effect on weight stigma of enjoyment of physical activity and sport = c1.
Ijerph 18 09957 g001
Ijerph 18 09957 g002 550
Figure 2. Conceptual Mediation Model. Indirect effect of weight stigma on tendency to avoid physical activity and sport through weight bias internalization only = a1, b1; indirect effect of weight stigma on tendency to avoid physical activity and sport through weight bias internalization and fear of negative appearance evaluation in serial = a1, d12, b2; direct effect of weight stigma on tendency to avoid physical activity and sport = c1.
Figure 2. Conceptual Mediation Model. Indirect effect of weight stigma on tendency to avoid physical activity and sport through weight bias internalization only = a1, b1; indirect effect of weight stigma on tendency to avoid physical activity and sport through weight bias internalization and fear of negative appearance evaluation in serial = a1, d12, b2; direct effect of weight stigma on tendency to avoid physical activity and sport = c1.
Ijerph 18 09957 g002
Table
Table 1. Mean (SD) participant ratings for men and women on each of the variables along with t-values, significance levels, score ranges, and effect sizes for group differences.
Table 1. Mean (SD) participant ratings for men and women on each of the variables along with t-values, significance levels, score ranges, and effect sizes for group differences.
VariablesMen (N = 151)Women (N = 427)TotalMinimum–Maximumt Valuep ValueEffect SIZE † d’
Age20.21 (1.92)19.70 (2.20)19.83 (2.14)17–352.540.0110.26
BMI23.22 (3.20)22.22 (3.49)22.48 (3.45)14.88–38.743.100.0020.30
Weight stigma6.00 (4.29)6.49 (4.83)6.36 (4.70)2.50–23−1.090.2760.11
WBIS2.60 (1.17)3.30 (1.39)3.12 (1.37)1–7−5.390.0000.52
Appearance Evaluation3.49 (0.76)3.17 (0.76)3.25 (0.77)1–54.360.0000.24
FNAE16.23 (5.70)18.98 (6.37)18.26 (6.32)6–30−4.700.0000.45
Enjoyment4.12 (0.66)3.72 (0.77)3.82 (0.76)1.31–55.340.0000.55
TAPAS16.16 (8.66)20.86 (10.40)19.63 (10.18)10–50−4.920.0000.50
Note: † Cohen’s d’, small effect ≈ 0.2 moderate effect ≈ 0.5, large effect ≈ 0.8+. Weight stigma = Perception of teasing scale, WBIS = Weight bias internalization scale, Appearance evaluation = Self-appearance evaluation, FNAE = Fear of negative appearance evaluation, Enjoyment = The physical activity enjoyment scale, TAPAS = Tendency to avoid physical activity and sport.
Table
Table 2. Pearson’s product moment correlations between all variables. Correlations for men (N = 151) are displayed above the diagonal, and women (N = 427) are displayed below the diagonal.
Table 2. Pearson’s product moment correlations between all variables. Correlations for men (N = 151) are displayed above the diagonal, and women (N = 427) are displayed below the diagonal.
12345678
1. Age-0.07−0.030.010.09−0.080.19 *−0.14
2. BMI0.01-0.17 *0.23 **−0.21 **−0.040.120.14
3. Weight stigma0.030.24 ***-0.60 ***−0.45 ***0.39 ***−0.28 **0.46 ***
4. WBIS0.020.35 ***0.51 ***-−0.75 ***0.54 ***−0.33 ***0.58 ***
5. Appearance evaluation0.07−0.32 ***−0.41 ***−0.71 ***-−0.43 ***0.36 ***−0.51 ***
6. FNAE−0.060.10 *0.31 ***0.62 ***−0.55 ***-−0.18 *0.35 ***
7. Enjoyment0.03−0.07−0.11 *−0.27 ***0.27 ***−0.19 ***-−0.50 ***
8. TAPAS−0.040.26 ***0.50 ***0.60 ***−0.47 ***0.50 ***−0.33 ***-
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.0001.
Table
Table 3. Regression models reporting unstandardized (B) and standardized beta’s (β) and standard errors (SE) for predictors of the enjoyment of physical activity and sport, and the tendency to avoid physical activity and sport measures.
Table 3. Regression models reporting unstandardized (B) and standardized beta’s (β) and standard errors (SE) for predictors of the enjoyment of physical activity and sport, and the tendency to avoid physical activity and sport measures.
Enjoyment of Physical Activity and Sport
Model 1Model 2Model 3Model 4
BSEβCIBSEβCIBSEβCIBSEβCI
Age0.020.020.06−0.010.050.020.020.06−0.010.050.020.010.05−0.010.040.020.010.05−0.010.05
Sex−0.370.07−0.22 ***−0.52−0.23−0.340.07−0.20 ***−0.49−0.20−0.200.07-0.12 *−0.34−0.05−0.200.07−0.12 *−0.34−0.05
BMI−0.010.01−0.03−0.030.010.000.010.01−0.020.020.020.010.09 *0.000.040.020.010.09 *0.000.04
WS-−0.030.01−0.16 ***−0.04−0.015.130.010.00−0.020.02−2.580.010.00−0.020.02
AE--0.190.060.19 **0.070.300.190.060.20 **0.080.31
WBIS--−0.100.04−0.19 *−0.17−0.04−0.110.04−0.20 *−0.19−0.35
FNAE---0.000.010.02−0.010.02
R20.05 ***0.08 ***0.16 ***0.16 ***
Tendency to Avoid Physical Activity and Sport
Age−0.350.19−0.07−0.730.03−0.390.17−0.08 *−0.72−0.05−0.370.16−0.08 *−0.68−0.07−0.330.15−0.07 *−0.63−0.03
Sex5.530.960.24 ***3.67.414.60.850.20 ***2.986.311.980.800.09 *0.413.551.980.790.09 *0.433.53
BMI0.710.130.23 ***0.470.960.360.120.12 *0.130.580.050.120.02−0.170.260.130.120.04−0.080.34
WS-1.00.800.46 ***0.841.150.530.080.25**0.370.700.530.080.25 **0.370.69
AE- -−0.710.64−0.05−1.960.54−0.330.64−0.03−1.580.92
WBIS- -3.160.380.42 **2.413.912.520.410.34 **1.713.33
FNAE- --0.260.070.16 **0.130.40
R20.10 *** 0.30 ***0.44 ***0.45 ***
Note: Sex uses men as the reference group. WS = Weight Stigma, AE = Appearance Evaluation, All VIF’s for all models were below 3.0. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.0001.
Table
Table 4. Regression coefficients and standard errors for the two serial mediation models presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2 and testing mediating relationships with enjoyment and avoidance of sport and physical activity respectively. All models account for age, BMI, and sex.
Table 4. Regression coefficients and standard errors for the two serial mediation models presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2 and testing mediating relationships with enjoyment and avoidance of sport and physical activity respectively. All models account for age, BMI, and sex.
Consequent
Appearance Evaluation WBIS Enjoyment
Antecedent Coeff.SEp Coeff.SEp Coeff.SEp
Weight stigmaa1−0.060.01<0.000a20.070.01<0.000c’0.000.010.99
Appearance evaluation ---d12−1.030.06<0.000b10.190.060.00
WBIS --- ---b2−0.100.040.00
WBIS FNAE TAPAS
Antecedent Coeff.SEp Coeff.SEp Coeff.SEp
Weight stigmaa10.130.01<0.000a20.030.050.52c’0.540.08<0.000
WBIS ---d122.990.19<0.000b12.580.36<0.000
FNAE --- ---b20.270.07<0.000
Note: Weight stigma = Perception of teasing scale, WBIS = Weight bias internalization scale, Appearance evaluation = Self-appearance evaluation, FNAE = Fear of negative appearance evaluation, Enjoyment = The physical activity enjoyment scale, TAPAS = Tendency to avoid physical activity and sport.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bevan, N.; O’Brien, K.S.; Lin, C.-Y.; Latner, J.D.; Vandenberg, B.; Jeanes, R.; Puhl, R.M.; Chen, I.-H.; Moss, S.; Rush, G. The Relationship between Weight Stigma, Physical Appearance Concerns, and Enjoyment and Tendency to Avoid Physical Activity and Sport. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9957. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199957

AMA Style

Bevan N, O’Brien KS, Lin C-Y, Latner JD, Vandenberg B, Jeanes R, Puhl RM, Chen I-H, Moss S, Rush G. The Relationship between Weight Stigma, Physical Appearance Concerns, and Enjoyment and Tendency to Avoid Physical Activity and Sport. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(19):9957. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199957

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bevan, Nadia, Kerry S. O’Brien, Chung-Ying Lin, Janet D. Latner, Brian Vandenberg, Ruth Jeanes, Rebecca M. Puhl, I-Hua Chen, Simon Moss, and Georgia Rush. 2021. "The Relationship between Weight Stigma, Physical Appearance Concerns, and Enjoyment and Tendency to Avoid Physical Activity and Sport" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 19: 9957. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199957

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop