Next Article in Journal
Enzyme Immobilization on Maghemite Nanoparticles with Improved Catalytic Activity: An Electrochemical Study for Xanthine
Next Article in Special Issue
Utilization of Fluidized Bed Combustion Fly Ash in the Design of Reuse Clay Soil in the Form of Self-Compacting Grouts
Previous Article in Journal
3D Printing of Piezoelectric Barium Titanate-Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds with Interconnected Porosity for Bone Tissue Engineering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recycling of Cigarette Butts in Fired Clay Bricks: A New Laboratory Investigation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/ma13071774
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Review of Application and Innovation of Geotextiles in Geotechnical Engineering

by
Hao Wu
1,
Chongkai Yao
1,
Chenghan Li
1,
Miao Miao
1,
Yujian Zhong
1,
Yuquan Lu
1 and
Tong Liu
2,*
1
School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
2
School of science, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(7), 1774; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071774
Submission received: 11 March 2020 / Revised: 30 March 2020 / Accepted: 7 April 2020 / Published: 10 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Sustainable Technologies for Recycling Waste Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Most geotextiles consist of polymers of polyolefin, polyester or polyamide family, which involve environmental problems related to soil pollution. Geotextiles can be used for at least one of the following functions: Separation, reinforcement, filtration, drainage, stabilization, barrier, and erosion protection. Due to the characteristics of high strength, low cost, and easy to use, geotextiles are widely used in geotechnical engineering such as soft foundation reinforcement, slope protection, and drainage system. This paper reviews composition and function of geotextiles in geotechnical engineering. In addition, based on literatures including the most recent data, the discussion turns to recent development of geotextiles, with emphasis on green geotextiles, intelligent geotextiles, and high-performance geotextiles. The present situation of these new geotextiles and their application in geotechnical engineering are reviewed.

1. Introduction

Geosynthetics are products made of synthetic or natural polymeric materials, which are used in contact with soil or rock and/or other geotechnical materials. Geosynthetics mainly include geotextile, geogrid, geocell, geonet, geomembrane, erosion control mat, geosynthetic clay liner, and geo-composite [1]. Geotextiles are the most widely used geosynthetics [2]. The first reported employment of geotextiles can be considered to be the nylon bags filled with sand used in the Dutch Delta Works in 1956 [3]. In the last 60 years, geotextiles were widely used in geotechnical engineering. Geotextiles can be used for at least one of the following functions in geotechnical engineering: Separation, filtration, drainage, reinforcement, stabilization, barrier, and erosion protection [4].
At present, more than 1.4 billion square meters of geotextiles are used every year, and the trend is on the rise. About 98% geotextiles consist of non-degradable polymers from the polyolefin, polyester, or polyamide family. The long-term use of geotextiles, because of quite a few environmental factors, such as wind, moisture, friction, and ultraviolet radiation, may cause the disintegration of synthetic polymer, resulting in the accumulation of micro plastics in the surrounding environment [5]. In addition, the application of geotextiles in geotechnical engineering may encounter complex environmental conditions [6], such as complex acid-base conditions, and then the performance requirements of geotextiles will be higher [7].
Therefore, geotextiles should develop towards high performance and multi-function. With the popularity of green concept, a multitude of scholars have studied the possibility of natural geotextiles replacing nonbiodegradable polymer geotextiles [5,8]. At present, natural geotextiles can replace synthetic geotextiles in 50% of all applications [9,10]. With the integration of optical fiber sensor into geotextiles, geotextiles are also developing towards the field of multi-functional intelligence [11,12]. When the intelligent geotextiles are applied to the reinforcement of the geotechnical structure, it can also carry out the health monitoring of the geotechnical structure, so as to ensure that the geotechnical structure and its locations with high failure and damage risk can be found in the early stage, which is conducive to prevention and maintenance in advance [13,14]. With the progress of fiber materials, a number of new high-performance geotextiles have emerged, including wicking geotextiles [15,16] and basalt fiber needling geotextiles [17].
Geotextiles are considered as cost effective, durable, and easy to use. Nowadays, geotextiles are of ever-growing indispensability in geotechnical engineering. This paper reviews composition and function of geotextiles in geotechnical engineering. In addition, based on literatures including the most recent data, the discussion turns to recent development of geotextiles, with emphasis on green geotextiles, intelligent geotextiles, and high-performance geotextiles. The development of these new geotextiles and their application in geotechnical engineering are reviewed.

2. Composition and Function of Geotextiles

2.1. Base Material of Synthetic Geotextiles

The selection of geotextile materials must be adequate to the actual situation of the project, not only considering the performance requirements of geotextiles in the site, but also considering the product cost. At present, the basic material of geotextiles is mainly synthetic fiber. Polypropylene (PP) is the most frequently used material in connection with geotextiles, followed by polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyethylene (PE) [5]. Figure 1 illustrates the most common polymers used as geotextiles and SEM image.
Polypropylene is one of the most widely used fibers for geotextiles because of its low cost, acceptable tensile properties, and chemical inertness. This fiber has an additional advantage because of its low density, which results in an extremely low cost per volume. The main disadvantage of polypropylene is its poor sensitivity to UV. In addition, at high temperature, its performance is easy to deteriorate, demonstrating poor creep characteristics [18]. Table 1 summarizes the properties of the most common polymers used as geotextiles.
Another major synthetic fiber for geotextiles is PET. It has excellent tensile properties and high creep resistance. The geotextiles made of polyester fiber can be used at high temperature. The main disadvantage of polyester fiber is that it is easy to hydrolyze and degrade in the soil with a pH value more than 10 [19].
Although polyethylene fiber is usually used to make geomembranes, due to the lack of supply of polyethylene fiber, it has become a rarely used solution in the field of geotextiles. Polyamide is also rarely used in geotextiles due to its low cost and poor comprehensive performance [20].
Additives are usually added to enhance the performance of geotextiles, such as antioxidants, hindered amine light stabilizer, UV absorbers and stabilizers, Long term thermal stabilizer, processing modifiers, flame retardants, lubricants, and antibacterial agents [23].

2.2. Function of Geotextiles

2.2.1. Geotextiles Used in Separation

The separation function of geotextiles refers to a geotextile can separate two kinds of materials with different properties, avoid mixing with each other, and lose the integrity and structural integrity of various materials. In Figure 2, when stone aggregates are placed on fine-grained soil, both mechanisms will occur at the same time over time. One is that the fine soil in the lower layer tries to enter the void of the aggregate, thus destroying its drainage capacity; the other is that the aggregate in the upper layer tries to invade the fine soil, thus destroying the strength of the aggregate [24]. This usually happens without the use of geotextiles.
Figure 3 demonstrates the comparison of pavement with or without geotextiles. The separation function of geotextiles can effectively prevent the pumping effect created by dynamics [25,26]. Some of the applications areas are [27]:
  • Between subgrade and stone base in unpaved and paved roads and airfields
  • Between subgrade in railroads
  • Between landfills and stone base courses
  • Between geomembranes and sand drainage layers
  • Beneath sidewalks slabs
  • Beneath curb areas
  • Beneath parking lots
  • Beneath sport and athletic fields

2.2.2. Geotextiles Used in Filtration

In an internally unstable soil, seepage may cause the phenomenon of suffusion; the transport of fine particles by seepage flow is accompanied by a collapse of the soil structure [28,29,30]. Because geotextiles have positive permeability and air permeability, they can be placed in the soil structure to allow the liquid in the soil to pass through and discharged, and play a role of soil conservation, which can effectively prevent the loss of soil particles, fine sand, and small stones in the upstream, prevent soil damage, and effectively avoid the phenomenon of suffusion [31,32,33]. The mechanism is demonstrated in Figure 4. The filtration function of geotextiles is also widely used in geotechnical engineering. As an example, geotextiles are used to prevent soil particles from migrating and infiltrating drainage aggregates or drainage pipes, while maintaining the normal operation of drainage systems; laying geotextiles under a riprap protective layer and other protective materials on coasts and riverbanks can prevent soil erosion and river bank collapse.

2.2.3. Geotextiles Used in Drainage

Geotextiles have favorable water conductivity, which are used as drainage channel. The water in the soil structure in the geotextiles can be collected and slowly discharged along the geotextiles (Figure 5). At present, geotextiles have been widely used in underground drainage, subgrade drainage, retaining wall drainage, and other drainage works (Figure 6) [26,34].

2.2.4. Geotextiles Used in Reinforcement

Geotextiles are placed in the interior of the soil as reinforcing materials, which combine with the soil to form a reinforced composite soil. Compared with the unreinforced soil, the strength and deformation performance of the reinforced composite soils are improved obviously (Figure 7). There are three crucial mechanical properties of geotextiles used for reinforcement: Tensile modulus, tensile strength, and surface friction. The reinforcement function of geotextiles is the most commonly used in geotechnical engineering. As shown in Figure 8, it has been widely used in reinforcing paved and unpaved roads and railroads, reinforcing walls, berms, and slopes and reinforcing soft soil foundations [6,36].
In addition to the above several main applications of geotextiles, the functions of geotextiles include barrier and erosion protection. The anti-seepage function of geotextiles is usually used in reservoir anti-seepage, tunnel anti-seepage, and landfill anti-seepage [33,37]. The protective effect of geotextiles is generally through laying geotextiles, which can reduce soil loss caused by rainfall impact and surface water runoff [9,38]. Generally speaking, geotextiles play more than two functions at the same time, when used in geotechnical engineering.

2.3. Analysis of the Application of Geotextiles

Geotextiles have played a crucial role in the field of geotechnical engineering and demonstrated a steady growth in global market demand. The global geotextile market size is estimated to be 4.6 billion US dollars in 2019, and the compound annual growth rate is expected to be 11.9%. Driven by China, India, and other countries, the Asia Pacific region is the largest geotextile market. Due to the high demand for geotextiles in the country’s modern infrastructure development projects, China accounted for 45.7% of the Asia Pacific geotextile market in 2019. As shown in the Figure 9, the major applications of geotextiles include road construction, erosion prevention, and drainage systems.
With the increasing demand of geotextiles, the geotextiles have also been innovated. With the development of green concept, the natural geotextiles made of natural fibers are worth considering. Intelligent geotextiles are also the trend of geotextile development. At present, the integration of optical fiber sensors into geotextiles can make geotextiles have the functions of reinforcement, structural safety monitoring, and early warning [12,39,40]. The latest development of natural geotextile, intelligent geotextile, and high-performance geotextile will be summarized in detail below.

3. Green Geotextiles

Most geotextiles are made of PP, PET, and PE, which are non-degradable polymers. In the long-term use process, because of external environmental factors, such as wind, water, friction, and UV radiation, it may cause the collapse of synthetic polymers, resulting in the accumulation of micro plastics in the surrounding environment [44,45,46]. Secondly, the disintegration of the polymer will cause the additives to filter from the geotextile, which will pollute the environment [23]. The properties of geotextiles made of natural fibers meet the needs of most applications, and have low cost and biodegradability. Therefore, natural geotextiles have the potential to replace synthetic geotextiles in quite a few applications of geotextiles [9,47].

3.1. Base Material of Natural Geotextiles

There are three kinds of natural fibers: Plant fibers, animal fibers, and mineral fibers. Among these fibers, plant fibers have become the first choice for natural geotextiles because of rich sources, easy extraction, low cost, and superior performance [48,49].
The properties of natural fibers are determined by the composition and location of the components [50]. The main components of natural fibers are cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and pectin [51]. The content of each component in each natural fiber is different. Cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin are the basic components that determine the physical properties of fibers [52]. Cellulose is the hardest and strongest organic component in fiber [53]. Hemicellulose has an open structure, which contains an army of hydroxyl and acetyl groups. Therefore, hemicellulose is partially soluble in water and has hygroscopicity. Lignin is mainly aromatic, phenylpropane unit polymer. The service life of natural geotextile depends on the content of cellulose and lignin in the component fiber; the higher the content, the higher the durability [54]. Figure 10 summarizes chemical structure and properties of main components in plant fiber.
The properties of natural fibers vary with different types. Natural geotextiles usually choose natural fibers with high mechanical properties as raw materials. Table 2 outlines the composition and properties of natural fibers commonly used to make natural geotextiles. Among these fibers, jute and coir fibers have become the best research materials for natural geotextiles due to their superior performance, and several commercial products are available.

3.2. Performance of Natural Geotextiles in Geotechnical Engineering

In recent years, natural geotextiles have been greatly developed. A multitude of scholars have studied the application and performance of natural geotextiles in geotechnical engineering [5,8,48,56]. The author sorts out and analyzes the application of natural geotextiles in geotechnical engineering in recent years. Figure 11 demonstrates the common natural geotextiles at present.
Soil erosion refers to the process that soil is stripped and moved by wind or surface water due to inadequate or inappropriate vegetation coverage [56,66]. Soil degradation caused by erosion has a serious adverse impact on environmental sustainability and agricultural productivity. In order to prevent the soil from further degradation, geotextiles are used as the soil cover to provide temporary protection for the soil, which can effectively control erosion until the soil is stabilized by vegetation. Geotextiles made of natural fibers have high efficiency in erosion control [60]. Table 3 summarizes natural geotextiles used for protection and its protective effect. Compared with synthetic geotextiles, natural geotextiles are more effective in controlling erosion and have better soil adhesion [57]. More importantly, due to the biodegradability of natural geotextiles, the accumulation of microplastics in the environment can be avoided. Moreover, the short life and hygroscopicity of natural geotextiles have little effect on erosion control [66]. As long as vegetation is established on site, geotextiles become redundant in erosion control, so the service life of natural geotextile is about two to three years, which has little impact on erosion control. The water absorption and water storage of natural geotextiles are considered as a positive aspect [65]. Firstly, high water absorption reduces soil runoff caused by heavy rain. Secondly, the stored water can be released to the ground stably in dry weather, which creates an ideal environment for plant growth. Because synthetic geotextiles hardly absorb water, it is considered that natural geotextiles are more suitable for erosion prevention than synthetic geotextiles. In addition, the decomposition products of natural geotextiles are rich in soil nutrients, which can be used as fertilizer for new vegetation [62].
Natural geotextiles have high initial tensile strength. Used for road construction, it can be effectively reinforced at the initial stage of road use [74]. The study on the bearing capacity of jute geotextiles reinforced and unreinforced roads found that compared with unreinforced roads, the bearing capacity of jute geotextile reinforced and unreinforced roads increased by about 1.5–7 times [75]. Due to the biodegradability of natural fibers, the performance of natural geotextiles will decrease with the passage of time, which will lead to the failure of later reinforcement when used in road construction [69]. In recent years, scholars have found that the long-term durability of natural geotextiles is not particularly crucial for strengthening the stability of rural highway subgrade. In India, a growing amount of natural geotextiles are used to strengthen the subgrade of rural roads [76]. This is because the natural geotextiles have high initial tensile strength, which makes the subgrade bear low stress during the construction and operation period of the road. Then, with the passage of time, the consolidation and compaction of the subgrade soil occur under the traffic load, so the bearing capacity is enhanced. After the degradation of the natural geotextile, the bearing capacity of the subgrade meets the use requirements [77]. Table 4 summarizes natural geotextile used for reinforcement and its effect.
Natural geotextiles can also be used for medium and short term filtration or drainage, and natural fibers have the ability to remove heavy metals [78,79]. Abbar et al. [80] Studied the effect of linen geotextile on soluble heavy metals using filters filled with sand and flax geotextile. The results demonstrated that flax geotextile improved the ability of the filter to retain soluble metals and attach heavy metals (Figure 12). Therefore, natural geotextiles have obvious advantages in filtering soluble heavy metals. However, the hygroscopicity of plant fibers involves the key problems of water absorption and fiber expansion. It is found that jute geotextile, as drainage medium, is feasible and economical dealing with drainage problems encountered in geotechnical engineering [63]. Due to the high-water absorption, the pore diameter of the filter is significantly reduced. In the worst case, this will lead to filter plugging and complete loss of permeability. The hygroscopicity and service life of natural geotextiles limit the filtration or drainage function of natural geotextiles.
From the above application of natural geotextiles, it can be found that the early biodegradation of natural geotextiles is the primary problem that limits the further function of natural geotextiles [5]. Much of the research in natural geotextiles in the last two decades has examined how to improve the durability of natural geotextiles. Table 5 demonstrates the methods to improve the performance of natural geotextiles in recent years. At present, the main methods enhancing the properties of natural geotextile are to add a certain quantity of synthetic fiber, or to modify the natural geotextile chemically. Adding a certain amount of synthetic fiber can improve the physical and mechanical properties of natural geotextile. These natural fiber/polymer composite geotextiles, such as jute/PET geotextiles, jute/PP geotextiles [60,81], and nettle/ polylactic acid geotextiles [82], demonstrate promising performance in various tests. Chemical modification or use of adhesion promoters can also be interesting paths to improve the overall mechanical properties. La Mantia et al. [83] summarized the methods of chemical modification of natural fiber: Alkali treatment, acetylation, treatment with stearic acid, benzylation, TDI treatment, peroxide treatment, anhydride treatment, permanganate treatment, silane treatment, isocyanate treatment, and plasma treatment. A multitude of researchers have studied chemical modified geotextiles, such as the chemical degradation resistance of jute geotextiles treated by esterification is improved [84,85], physical properties of jute geotextiles treated with laccase are improved, and the anti-puncture ability of jute geotextiles treated with alkali is better [86].

4. Intelligent Geotextiles

Fiber optical sensor is a new type of sensor based on optical fiber developed in the mid-1970s [92,93]. It has the advantages of superior electrical insulation, strong anti-electromagnetic interference, high sensitivity, and easy to realize remote monitoring of the measured signal [94,95,96]. The optical fiber sensor is integrated into the geotextiles by using a number of warp knitting fixed positions between the sensor and the fabric. When geotextiles are applied to the stability and reinforcement of geotechnical structures such as dams, railways, embankments, and slopes, optical fiber sensors can provide other functions for geotextiles, such as monitoring the changes of mechanical deformation, temperature, humidity, and pore pressure to monitor the health of geotechnical structures, so as to ensure the early detection of high failure and failure risk of geotechnical structures and their locations, which is advantageous prevent or repair in advance [97]. Therefore, intelligent geotextiles have a superior prospect.

4.1. Development of Intelligent Geotextiles

Fiber optic sensor based on Fiber Bragg grating (FBG) is the first sensor applied to geotextiles [98,99,100]. The working principle and sensing principle of FBG are shown in Figure 13. However, this technology is a quasi distributed measurement technology, which only provides strain information along a finite number of points of an optical fiber, resulting in the FBG based optical fiber sensor monitoring system can only measure the quasi distributed strain of a limited length, which cannot meet the monitoring needs of hundreds of meters long embankment, dam, railway, slope, and other geotechnical structures. Secondly, the FBG sensor uses silica fiber as sensor medium, and the ultimate strain of common silica optical fiber is only about 5%. The cost of FBG sensor is relatively high, around than 20 US dollars for each point sensor [101]. Therefore, its high cost and vulnerability also limit the use of this fiber-optic sensor in intelligent geotextiles [102,103].
In order to meet the needs of large-area geotechnical structure monitoring, distributed optical fiber sensors came into being. Brillouin scattering is a kind of light scattering phenomenon caused by the interaction between the light wave incident into the fiber and the elastic sound wave in the fiber [100,105,106]. Optical fiber distributed Brillouin scattering sensor uses its backscattering signal to measure the external physical quantities. Geotextiles based on this kind of sensor (Figure 14), it can not only strengthen the geotechnical structure, but also meet the monitoring needs of large-area geotechnical structure.
When the mechanical deformation (strain >1%) of the above two kinds of intelligent geotextiles occurs, the optical fiber sensor is likely to fail, and the brittleness of silica fiber must be protected by expensive cable. Polymer optical fiber sensor integrated geotextile (Figure 15) provides a solution for distributed measurement of high strain. POF optical time domain reflectometer technology is based on the principle of increasing the level of scattered light at the place where strain is applied to POF [107,108,109]. Liehr et al. [110] found that with OTDR technology, up to 40% of the strain distribution can be measured using standard polymethyl methacrylate POF. Compared with the above-mentioned sensors, POF with high elasticity, high fracture strain, and measurement strain (higher than 40%) has more advantages as the integration of sensors on geotextile, especially for the monitoring of high mechanical deformation (such as slope with landslide risk) in a small area. Low loss perfluoropof can extend the measurement range to 500 m. POF sensor can be directly processed by textile machinery, and can be embedded in the manufacturing process of fabric structure (multi axis fabric).
In addition to the fiber optic sensor integrated geotextile, other advanced materials are also promoting the development of intelligent geotextile, such as graphene coating. Graphene can give geotextiles excellent properties, including excellent thermal conductivity (large thermal conductivity), excellent conductivity, high strength (weight reduction), stability, self repair, hydrophobicity, antibacterial performance (to prevent filter plugging), and temperature/pressure/humidity sensing function (temperature, pressure change, and leakage location detection) [111]. It can be predicted that more intelligent geotextiles will emerge in the near future and play a greater role in geotechnical engineering.

4.2. Application of Intelligent Geotextiles in Geotechnical Engineering-case Study

4.2.1. Railway Embankment Monitoring Near Chemnitz

German STFI and Italian Alpe Adria Textile [112] have applied integrated geotextiles based on the POF OTDR technology to railway embankments near the German city of Kemnes (Figure 16). Fiber optic integrated geotextiles were intact during the rigorous installation process and were regularly questioned after the embankment reconstruction in 2007 to check the occurrence of embankment deformation or settlement that may be caused by railway transportation. The field experiment proves the feasibility of using optical fiber integrated geotextile to reinforce and monitor railway embankment at the same time. In addition, the sensor fabric can also withstand the installation of heavy machinery in the construction site without any damage. With the exception of a small and uniform increase in attenuation along the fiber, no negative long-term effects occurred within 14 months of installation.

4.2.2. Field Test to Evaluate the Slope Stability at Belchatow in Poland

The scope of this field test is to assess the possibility of investigating and observing creep and landslide slopes using optical fiber integrated geotextiles. The chosen fiber is a standard PMMA POF, which is integrated in the geotextile and is able to measure distributed strain behavior on a length of 100 m. Standard PMMA POF can observe strain up to 40%. Through the evaluation of the length change of the sensing optical fiber, the position and the creep velocity of the creep landslide crack were determined. The results show that the creep velocity of the slope was constant, and the average velocity was about 2 mm per day. The test results prove the applicability of intelligent geotextiles in structural health monitoring.

4.2.3. Field Tests to Evaluate the Benefit of a Geotechnical Reinforcement of a Slope Failure at Zimmersrode

Field tests were carried out at an old mining site in Zimmersrode [113], located about 50 km south of Kassel, Germany. The intelligent geotextiles that the optical fiber sensors integrated first in a thin rope-like geotextile and then placed between two layers of non-woven filter mats were used. The aim was to collect valuable information as well as the performance of the intelligent geotextiles against the weather and mechanical straining. The test results prove POF integrated geotextile provides a solution for distributed measurement of high strain, and no negative influence of moisture on sensor fibers.

5. High Performance Geotextiles

With the expansion of the application of geotextiles and the complexity of the environment, high-strength, multi-functional, and high-performance geotextiles have become the development direction of geotextiles.
At present, the main methods to improve the performance of geotextiles are additives, chemical modification, and composite geotextiles [114,115]. It is a shared method to use additives to make up the performance defects of geotextiles, such as stabilizers and antioxidants, but an army of additives are polluting the environment. The modification of geotextile is also a crucial means to expand the application field of geotextile and enhance the added value. The modified geotextile has higher strength and anti-degradation. As an example, grafting chitosan or cysteine covalently onto acrylic modified PP geotextile can make the geotextiles have the ability to capture heavy metals while draining or filtering [116]. Composite geotextiles are usually made of a mixture of various fibers, which combine the best functions of different materials.
Finding suitable high-performance fibers has always been a crucial research direction of high-performance geotextiles. The strength and modulus of inorganic fiber such as glass fiber [117], basalt fiber [118], and carbon fiber [119,120,121,122,123] are obviously higher than that of synthetic fiber. However, due to the high production cost, a large area of inorganic fiber on geotextiles is limited. The glass fiber composite geotextiles, made of glass fibers and short fiber needled non-woven fabric, have the characteristics of high water-permeability, excellent anti filtration, and wear resistance [124,125]. Basalt fiber geotextiles has the advantages of environmental protection and high temperature resistance [126,127]. In addition to the above several fiber materials, there are an army of fiber materials, which have the possibility of being used as high-performance geotextile raw materials, among which the most desirable one is nanofiber. Nanofibers are one of the most advanced materials, which can be easily designed into high-performance materials with unique performance, and can greatly enhance the performance of existing geotextiles [128,129,130,131].

6. Conclusions

In recent decades, geotextiles have been widely used in geotechnical engineering, and the global market demand is growing steadily. Geotextiles are mostly composed of polyolefin, polyester, or polyamide series polymers, and additives are usually added to enhance the performance of geotextiles. Geotextiles can be used for at least one of the following functions in geotechnical engineering: Separation, filtration, drainage, reinforcement, barrier, and erosion protection. Geotextiles play an increasingly crucial role in geotechnical engineering, but there are also quite a few potential problems: A slice of geotechnical engineering put forward higher requirements for geotextiles, the degradation of geotextiles in the application process and potential environmental pollution. These are worthy of our attention.
Based on the literature review and the latest data, the development trend of geotextiles is discussed. The natural geotextile conforms to the green concept, which is conducive to reducing environmental pollution. Natural fiber geotextile is mainly composed of plant fiber. In a slice of short and medium-term applications of geotechnical engineering, it can replace the traditional geotextile naturally. Especially in the application of erosion control, the water absorption and storage of natural geotextile are positive aspects. Durability limits the application of natural fiber geotextile. At present, the durability of natural geotextile can be effectively improved by adding quite a few synthetic fibers and chemical modification.
When the intelligent geotextile is applied to the reinforcement of the geotechnical structure, the health monitoring of the geotechnical structure can be carried out, so as to ensure that the geotechnical structure and its location with high failure and damage risk can be found in the early stage, which is conducive to prevention and maintenance in advance. The monitoring ability of the intelligent geotextile depends on the characteristics of the sensor. At present, the fiber-optic sensors integrated into geotextile mainly include fiber-optic sensors based on Fiber Bragg grating, fiber-optic sensors based on Brillouin scattering, and polymer fiber-optic sensors, which have their own advantages and disadvantages. In contrast, POF sensors with high elasticity, high fracture strain, and measuring strain (higher than 40%) are more suitable for intelligent geotextile. In addition to optical fiber sensors, there are other technologies, such as graphene technology, which can make geotextiles intelligent.
High performance geotextile is always a crucial direction of geotextile development. At present, it is mainly to add additives and modify geotextile to make up for the performance defects of geotextile. Secondly, the geotextile with excellent properties can be made from high performance fiber, such as glass fiber or basalt fiber. In the future, it is possible to design geotextiles with unique and excellent properties by applying nanofibers to geotextiles

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.W., T.L., C.Y.; Discussions and literature reviews, H.W., C.L., M.M.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, C.Y., Y.Z., Y.L.; Writing-Review and editing, H.W., T.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Project on Social Development of Department of science and technology of Shaanxi Province (No.2018SF-378, No.2020SF-383, No.2020SF-428).

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Project on Social Development of Department of science and technology of Shaanxi Province (No. 2018SF-378, No. 2020SF-383, No. 2020SF-428).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Park, J.-B.; Park, H.-S.; Kim, D. Geosynthetic reinforcement of sand-mat layer above soft ground. Materials 2013, 6, 5314–5334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Zhao, Y.; Zhou, S.; Zhao, C.; Valeo, C. The influence of geotextile type and position in a porous asphalt pavement system on Pb (II) removal from stormwater. Water 2018, 10, 1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Koerner, R. Early background and history of geotextiles. In Geotextiles; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 3–15. [Google Scholar]
  4. Agrawal, B.J. Geotextile: It’s application to civil engineering–overview. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Recent Trends in Engineering & Technology, Anand, 13–14 May 2011; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  5. Prambauer, M.; Wendeler, C.; Weitzenböck, J.; Burgstaller, C. Biodegradable geotextiles–An overview of existing and potential materials. Geotext. Geomembr. 2019, 47, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, T.; Zhong, Y.; Feng, Z.; Xu, W.; Song, F. New construction technology of a shallow tunnel in boulder-cobble mixed grounds. Adv. Civil Eng. 2020, 5686042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Miszkowska, A.; Lenart, S.; Koda, E. Changes of permeability of nonwoven geotextiles due to clogging and cyclic water flow in laboratory conditions. Water 2017, 9, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guerra, A.; Bezerra, J.; Fullen, M.A.; Mendonça, J.; Jorge, M. The effects of biological geotextiles on gully stabilization in São Luís, Brazil. Nat. Hazards 2015, 75, 2625–2636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bhattacharyya, R.; Smets, T.; Fullen, M.A.; Poesen, J.; Booth, C.A. Effectiveness of geotextiles in reducing runoff and soil loss: A synthesis. Catena 2010, 81, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Evangeline, S.Y.; Sayida, M.; Girish, M. Long-Term Performance of Rural Roads Reinforced with Coir Geotextile–A Field Study. J. Nat. Fibers 2019, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liehr, S.; Lenke, P.; Krebber, K.; Seeger, M.; Thiele, E.; Metschies, H.; Gebreselassie, B.; Münich, J.C.; Stempniewski, L. Distributed strain measurement with polymer optical fibers integrated into multifunctional geotextiles. In Proceedings of the Optical Sensors, Strasbourg, France, 7–10 April 2008; p. 700302. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, L.; Xu, S.; Qiu, J. Automatic monitoring system in underground engineering construction: Review and prospect. Adv. Civil Eng. (in press).
  13. Artières, O.; Dortland, G. A fiber optics textile composite sensor for geotechnical applications. In Proceedings of the Fourth European Workshop on Optical Fibre Sensors, Porto, Portugal, 8–10 September; p. 765331.
  14. Lu, L.; Wang, Z.J.; Feng, H.; Arai, K. Analysis of Long-term Deformation of Reinforced Retaining Wall using Optical Fiber Sensor Geotextile. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 580–583, 338–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lin, C.; Zhang, X.; Han, J. Comprehensive Material Characterizations of Pavement Structure Installed with Wicking Fabrics. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2019, 31, 04018372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, F.; Han, J.; Zhang, X.; Guo, J. Laboratory tests to evaluate effectiveness of wicking geotextile in soil moisture reduction. Geotext. Geomembr. 2017, 45, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zongcai, D.; Zhifu, D. Durability of high strength polypropylene spunbonded needle punctured geotextile. J. Text. Res. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  18. Stepanovic, J.M.; Trajkovic, D.; Stojiljkovic, D.; Djordjic, D. Predicting the behavior of nonwoven geotextile materials made of polyester and polypropylene fibers. Text. Res. J. 2016, 86, 1385–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pelyk, L.V.; Vasylechko, V.O.; Kyrychenko, O.V. Influence of Biodestructors on the Wear Resistance of Polyester Geotextile Materials. Colloids and Interfaces 2019, 3, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Rawal, A.; Shah, T.; Anand, S. Geotextiles in civil engineering. In Handbook of Technical Textiles; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 111–133. [Google Scholar]
  21. Atrechian, M.; Ahmadi, M. Studies on the Characteristics of the Type of Geotextiles. In Proceedings of the Civil Infrastructures Confronting Severe Weathers and Climate Changes Conference; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rawal, A.; Shah, T.; Anand, S. Geotextiles: Production, properties and performance. Text. Prog. 2010, 42, 181–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wiewel, B.V.; Lamoree, M. Geotextile composition, application and ecotoxicology—A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 317, 640–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Koerner, G.R. Geotextiles used in separation. In Geotextiles; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 239–256. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tan, Y.; Li, X.; Kang, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhu, Y. Zoned excavation of an oversized pit close to an existing metro line in stiff clay: Case study. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 2015, 29, 04014158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, C.; Xing, L.; Liu, H.; Quan, Z.; Fu, G.; Wu, J.; Lv, Z.; Zhu, C. Numerical study of bond slip between section steel and recycled aggregate concrete with full replacement ratio. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Song, Z.; Shi, G.; Zhao, B.; Zhao, K.; Wang, J. Study of the stability of tunnel construction based on double-heading advance construction method. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2020, 12, 1687814019896964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Fannin, R.J.; Slangen, P. On the distinct phenomena of suffusion and suffosion. Geotech. Lett. 2014, 4, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cheng, W.C.; Li, G.; Liu, N.N.; Xu, J.; Horpibulsuk, S. Recent massive incidents for subway construction in soft alluvial deposits of Taiwan: A review. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2020, 96, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, X.; Lai, J.; Qiu, J.; Xu, W.; Wang, L.; Luo, Y. Geohazards, reflection and challenges in mountain tunnel construction of China: A data collection from 2002 to 2018. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2020, 11, 667–675. [Google Scholar]
  31. Muthukumaran, A.; Ilamparuthi, K. Laboratory studies on geotextile filters as used in geotextile tube dewatering. Geotext. Geomembr. 2006, 24, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cao, L.; Zhang, D.; Fang, Q.; Yu, L. Movements of ground and existing structures induced by slurry pressure-balance tunnel boring machine (SPB TBM) tunnelling in clay. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2020, 97, 103278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sun, H.; Wang, Q.P.; Zhang, P.; Zhong, Y.J.; Yue, X.B. Spatialtemporal Characteristics of Tunnel Traffic Accidents in China from 2001 to Present. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019, 2019, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Zhou, Z.; Dong, Y.; Jiang, P.; Han, D.; Liu, T. Calculation of pile side friction by multiparameter statistical analysis. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019, 2019, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lin, C.; Zhang, X. A bio-wicking system to dehydrate road embankment. J. Clean Prod. 2018, 196, 902–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Qiu, J.; Liu, T.; Yang, L.; She, H. Moisture absorption characteristics and thermal insulation performance of thermal insulation materials for cold region tunnels. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 237, 117765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, Y.; Sun, W.; Du, B.; Liu, J. The physical clogging of the landfill leachate collection system in China: Based on filtration test and numerical modelling. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2018, 15, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zheng, Y.; Xiong, J.; Liu, T.; Yue, X.; Qiu, J. Performance of a deep excavation in Lanzhou strong permeable sandy gravel strata. Arab. J. Geosci. 2020, 13, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Voet, M.R.-H.; Nancey, A.; Vlekken, J. Geodetect: A new step for the use of Fibre Bragg Grating technology in soil engineering. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Optical Fibre Sensors, Bruges, Belgium, 23–27 May 2005; pp. 214–217. [Google Scholar]
  40. Benjamim, C.V.d.S.; Bueno, B.d.S.; Zornberg, J.G. Field monitoring evaluation of geotextile-reinforced soil-retaining walls. Geosynth. Int. 2007, 14, 100–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kermani, B.; Stoffels, S.M.; Xiao, M. Evaluation of effectiveness of geotextile in reducing subgrade migration in rigid pavement. Geosynth. Int. 2020, 27, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tavangar, Y.; Shooshpasha, I. Impacts of a nonwoven geotextile arrangement on load-bearing capacity of reinforced sand: A laboratory study. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 2020, 5, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xingxin, N.; Jingjing, Z.; Luhan, Y. Research on evolution of collaboration mechanism of stakeholders in mining enterprises’ implementation of social responsibility. Rairo-Oper Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Carneiro, J.R.; Almeida, P.J.; Lopes, M.d.L. Laboratory evaluation of interactions in the degradation of a polypropylene geotextile in marine environments. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 2018, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Koerner, R.; Hsuan, Y.; Koerner, G. Lifetime predictions of exposed geotextiles and geomembranes. Geosynth. Int. 2017, 24, 198–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Esiukova, E.; Chubarenko, B.; Simon, F.-G. Debris of geosynthetic materials on the shore of the South-Eastern Baltic (Kaliningrad Oblast, the Russian Federation). In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/OES Baltic International Symposium (BALTIC), Klaipeda, Lithuania, 12–15 June 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  47. Marques, A.R.; Vianna, C.R.; Monteiro, M.L.; Pires, B.O.S.; de Carvalho Urashima, D.; Pontes, P.P. Utilizing coir geotextile with grass and legume on soil of Cerrado, Brazil: An alternative strategy in improving the input of nutrients in degraded pasture soil? Appl. Soil Ecol. 2016, 107, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yan, L.; Chouw, N.; Jayaraman, K. Flax fibre and its composites–A review. Compos. Part B: Eng. 2014, 56, 296–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bongarde, U.; Shinde, V. Review on natural fiber reinforcement polymer composites. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Innov. Technol. 2014, 3, 431–436. [Google Scholar]
  50. Azwa, Z.; Yousif, B.; Manalo, A.; Karunasena, W. A review on the degradability of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. Mater. Des. 2013, 47, 424–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Balla, V.K.; Kate, K.H.; Satyavolu, J.; Singh, P.; Tadimeti, J.G.D. Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects. Compos. Part B: Eng. 2019; 106956. [Google Scholar]
  52. Pickering, K.L.; Efendy, M.A.; Le, T.M. A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 83, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Sanjay, M.; Siengchin, S.; Parameswaranpillai, J.; Jawaid, M.; Pruncu, C.I.; Khan, A. A comprehensive review of techniques for natural fibers as reinforcement in composites: Preparation, processing and characterization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 108–121. [Google Scholar]
  54. Jaafar, J.; Siregar, J.P.; Salleh, S.M.; Hamdan, M.H.M.; Cionita, T.; Rihayat, T. Important considerations in manufacturing of natural fiber composites: A review. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 6, 647–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Koohestani, B.; Darban, A.; Mokhtari, P.; Yilmaz, E.; Darezereshki, E. Comparison of different natural fiber treatments: A literature review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 629–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wu, K.; Shao, Z.; Li, C.; Qin, S. Theoretical Investigation to the Effect of Bolt Reinforcement on Tunnel Viscoelastic Behavior. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2019; 45, 152–163. [Google Scholar]
  57. Jankauskas, B.; Jankauskiene, G.; Fullen, M. Soil conservation on road embankments using palm-mat geotextiles: Field studies in Lithuania. Soil Use Manag. 2012, 28, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ghosh, S.K.; Sanyal, T.; Bhattacharyya, R. Designing and engineering of jute geotextile (JGT) for river bank protection and its subsequent implementation in River Phulahar. J. Nat. Fibers 2016, 13, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Balan, K. River bank erosion control using coir geotextiles. IWRA 2016, 5, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  60. Chakrabarti, S.; Saha, S.; Paul, P.; Dewan, A.; Das, K.; Chowdhury, P.; Gon, D.; Ray, P. Specially treated woven jute geotextiles for river bank protection. IJFTR 2016, 41, 207–211. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sanyal, T. Control of Soil Erosion Caused by Rain and Wind with Jute Geotextiles. In Jute Geotext. their Applications in Civil Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 41–63. [Google Scholar]
  62. Nsiah, P.K.; Schaaf, W. The potentials of biological geotextiles in erosion and sediment control during gold mine reclamation in Ghana. J. Soils Sediments 2019, 19, 1995–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chattopadhyay, B.; Chakravarty, S. Application of jute geotextiles as facilitator in drainage. Geotext. Geomembr. 2009, 27, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhong, S.; Han, Z.; Li, A.; Du, H. Research on the Application of Palm Mat Geotextiles for Sand Fixation in the Hobq Desert. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Valle, S.; Albay, R.; Montilla, A. Bambusa blumeana fiber as erosion control geotextile on steep slopes. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; US Sarma: San Antonio, TX, USA, 1997; p. 012030. [Google Scholar]
  66. Shao, Q.; Gu, W.; Dai, Q.-y.; Makoto, S.; Liu, Y. Effectiveness of geotextile mulches for slope restoration in semi-arid northern China. Catena 2014, 116, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sudarsanan, N.; Mohapatra, S.R.; Karpurapu, R.; Amirthalingam, V. Use of natural geotextiles to retard reflection cracking in highway pavements. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2018, 30, 04018036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lal, D.; Sankar, N.; Chandrakaran, S. Effect of reinforcement form on the behaviour of coir geotextile reinforced sand beds. Soils Found. 2017, 57, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Basu, G.; Roy, A.; Sanyal, P.; Mitra, K.; Mishra, L.; Ghosh, S. Bioengineering of river earth embankment using natural fibre-based composite-structured geotextiles. Geotext. Geomembr. 2019, 47, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vinod, P.; Minu, M. Use of coir geotextiles in unpaved road construction. Geosynth. Int. 2010, 17, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Artidteang, S.; Bergado, D.T.; Chaiyaput, S.; Tanchaisawat, T. Embankment reinforced with limited life geotextiles on soft clay. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement; ICE Virtual Library: London, UK, 2015; pp. 130–143. [Google Scholar]
  72. Sanyal, T. Stabilizing Embankments with Jute Geotextiles. In Jute Geotext, Their Applications in Civil Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 103–109. [Google Scholar]
  73. Harinder, D.; Shankar, S. Experimental Evaluation of Coir Mats to Enhance the Weak Subgrade Soil Under Repeated Loading Conditions. Int. J.Traffic Transp. Eng. 2018, 8, 1523061. [Google Scholar]
  74. Sayida, M.; Evangeline, S.Y.; Girish, M. Coir geotextiles for paved roads: A laboratory and field study using non-plastic soil as subgrade. J. Nat. Fibers 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Khan, A.; Huq, F.; Hossain, S. Application of jute geotextiles for rural road pavement construction. In Proceedings of the Ground Improvement and Geosynthetics, Shanghai, China, 26–28 May 2014; pp. 370–379. [Google Scholar]
  76. Sarsby, R.W. Use of ‘Limited Life Geotextiles’(LLGs) for basal reinforcement of embankments built on soft clay. Geotext. Geomembr. 2007, 25, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kumar, P.S.; Devi, S.P. Effect of needle punched nonwoven coir and jute geotextiles on cbr strength of soft subgrade. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2011, 6, 114–116. [Google Scholar]
  78. Abbar, B.; Alem, A.; Pantet, A.; Marcotte, S.; Ahfir, N.-D.; Wang, H.; Ouahbi, T.; Duchemin, B.; Duriatti, D. Nonwoven flax fibres geotextiles effects on solute heavy metals transport in porous media. Environ. Technol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Abbar, B.; Alem, A.; Pantet, A.; Marcotte, S.; Ahfir, N.-D.; Duriatti, D. Experimental investigation on removal of suspended particles from water using flax fibre geotextiles. Environ. Technol. 2017, 38, 2964–2978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Abbar, B.; Alem, A.; Pantet, A.; Ahfir, N.-D.; Marcotte, S.; Wang, H.; Duchemin, B. Effect of natural geotextile on the cotransport of heavy metals (Cu2+, Pb2+, and Zn2+) and kaolinite particles. Environ. Technol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Shirazi, M.G.; Rashid, A.S.A.; Nazir, R.B.; Rashid, A.H.A.; Kassim, A.; Horpibulsuk, S. Investigation of tensile strength on alkaline treated and untreated kenaf geotextile under dry and wet conditions. Geotext. Geomembr. 2019, 47, 522–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kumar, N.; Das, D. Nonwoven geotextiles from nettle and poly (lactic acid) fibers for slope stabilization using bioengineering approach. Geotext. Geomembr. 2018, 46, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. La Mantia, F.; Morreale, M. Green composites: A brief review. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2011, 42, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Saha, P.; Roy, D.; Manna, S.; Adhikari, B.; Sen, R.; Roy, S. Durability of transesterified jute geotextiles. Geotext. Geomembr. 2012, 35, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Midha, V.K.; Joshi, S.; Kumar, S.S. Performance of chemically treated jute geotextile in unpaved roads at different in situ conditions. J. Inst. Eng. (India) Series E 2017, 98, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Rawal, A.; Sayeed, M. Mechanical properties and damage analysis of jute/polypropylene hybrid nonwoven geotextiles. Geotext. Geomembr. 2013, 37, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sumi, S.; Unnikrishnan, N.; Mathew, L. Experimental Investigations on Biological Resistance of Surface Modified Coir Geotextiles. Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 2016, 2, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Sumi, S.; Unnikrishnan, N.; Mathew, L. Surface modification of coir fibers for extended hydrophobicity and antimicrobial property for possible geotextile application. J. Nat. Fibers 2017, 14, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sumi, S.; Unnikrishnan, N.; Mathew, L. Durability studies of surface-modified coir geotextiles. Geotext. Geomembr. 2018, 46, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Dong, A.; Fan, X.; Wang, Q.; Yu, Y.; Cavaco-Paulo, A. Enzymatic treatments to improve mechanical properties and surface hydrophobicity of jute fiber membranes. BioResources 2016, 11, 3289–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Rawal, A.; Sayeed, M. Tailoring the structure and properties of jute blended nonwoven geotextiles via alkali treatment of jute fibers. Mater. Des. 2014, 53, 701–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Meng, L.; Wang, L.; Hou, Y.; Yan, G. A research on low modulus distributed fiber optical sensor for pavement material strain monitoring. Sensors 2017, 17, 2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Nedjalkov, A.; Meyer, J.; Köhring, M.; Doering, A.; Angelmahr, M.; Dahle, S.; Sander, A.; Fischer, A.; Schade, W. Toxic gas emissions from damaged lithium ion batteries—analysis and safety enhancement solution. Batteries 2016, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kersey, A.D.; Davis, M.A.; Patrick, H.J.; LeBlanc, M.; Koo, K.; Askins, C.; Putnam, M.; Friebele, E.J. Fiber grating sensors. J. Lightwave Technol. 1997, 15, 1442–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Morey, W.W.; Dunphy, J.R.; Meltz, G. Multiplexing fiber Bragg grating sensors. Fiber Integr. Opt. 1991, 10, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Mishra, V.; Singh, N.; Tiwari, U.; Kapur, P. Fiber grating sensors in medicine: Current and emerging applications. Sensors Actuators A: Phys. 2011, 167, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Habel, W.R.; Krebber, K. Fiber-optic sensor applications in civil and geotechnical engineering. Photon. Sensors 2011, 1, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Zhu, H.-H.; Shi, B.; Zhang, C.-C. FBG-based monitoring of geohazards: Current status and trends. Sensors 2017, 17, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Briançon, L.; Nancey, A.; Caquel, F.; Villard, P. New Technology for Strain Measurements in Soil and the Survey of Reinforced Earth Constructions; EUROGEO: London, UK, 2004; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  100. Wang, Z.-f.; Wang, J.; Sui, Q.-m.; Li, S.-c.; Jia, L. In-situ calibrated deformation reconstruction method for fiber Bragg grating embedded smart Geogrid. Sensors Actuators A: Phys. 2016, 250, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hong, C.; Zhang, Y.; Li, G.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Z. Recent progress of using Brillouin distributed fiber optic sensors for geotechnical health monitoring. Sensors Actuators A: Phys. 2017, 258, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Jiang, S.-F.; Qiao, Z.-H.; Li, N.-L.; Luo, J.-B.; Shen, S.; Wu, M.-H.; Zhang, Y. Structural health monitoring system based on FBG sensing technique for Chinese ancient timber buildings. Sensors 2020, 20, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Ghorat, M.; Gharehpetian, G.B.; Latifi, H.; Hejazi, M.A.; Bagheri, M. High-Resolution FBG-Based Fiber-Optic Sensor with Temperature Compensation for PD Monitoring. Sensors 2019, 19, 5285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Wu, H.; Guo, Y.; Xiong, L.; Liu, W.; Li, G.; Zhou, X. Optical Fiber-Based Sensing, Measuring, and Implementation Methods for Slope Deformation Monitoring: A Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2019, 19, 2786–2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Horiguchi, T.; Shimizu, K.; Kurashima, T.; Tateda, M.; Koyamada, Y. Development of a distributed sensing technique using Brillouin scattering. J. Light. Technol. 1995, 13, 1296–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kobyakov, A.; Sauer, M.; Chowdhury, D. Stimulated Brillouin scattering in optical fibers. Adv. Opt. Photon. 2010, 2, 1–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Yang, D.; Yu, J.; Tao, X.; Tam, H. Structural and mechanical properties of polymeric optical fiber. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 364, 256–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Stefani, A.; Andresen, S.; Yuan, W.; Herholdt-Rasmussen, N.; Bang, O. High sensitivity polymer optical fiber-Bragg-grating-based accelerometer. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2012, 24, 763–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Koike, Y.; Asai, M. The future of plastic optical fiber. NPG Asia Mater. 2009, 1, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Liehr, S.; Lenke, P.; Wendt, M.; Krebber, K.; Seeger, M.; Thiele, E.; Metschies, H.; Gebreselassie, B.; Munich, J.C. Polymer optical fiber sensors for distributed strain measurement and application in structural health monitoring. IEEE Sens. J. 2009, 9, 1330–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Aitchison, P.; Giorgio, V.; Mathieson, G. Geotextile with Conductive Properties. U.S. Patent 16,075,126, 7 February 2019. [Google Scholar]
  112. Fuggini, C.; Zangani, D.; Wosniok, A.; Krebber, K.; Franitza, P.; Gabino, L.; Weigand, F. Innovative approach in the use of geotextiles for failures prevention in railway embankments. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 14, 1875–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Zangani, D.; Fuggini, C.; Loriga, G. Electronic textiles for geotechnical and civil engineering. In Electronic Textiles; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 275–300. [Google Scholar]
  114. Jotisankasa, A.; Rurgchaisri, N. Shear strength of interfaces between unsaturated soils and composite geotextile with polyester yarn reinforcement. Geotext. Geomembr. 2018, 46, 338–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wu, K.; Shao, Z.; Qin, S.; Li, B. Determination of deformation mechanism and countermeasures in silty clay tunnel. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 2020, 34, 04019095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Vandenbossche, M.; Jimenez, M.; Casetta, M.; Bellayer, S.; Beaurain, A.; Bourbigot, S.; Traisnel, M. Chitosan-grafted nonwoven geotextile for heavy metals sorption in sediments. React. Funct. Polym. 2013, 73, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Schutte, C.L. Environmental durability of glass-fiber composites. Sci. Eng. R: Rep. 1994, 13, 265–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Dhand, V.; Mittal, G.; Rhee, K.Y.; Park, S.-J.; Hui, D. A short review on basalt fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos. Part B: Eng. 2015, 73, 166–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chung, D.D.; Chung, D. Carbon Fiber Composites; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  120. Kumar, S.; Doshi, H.; Srinivasarao, M.; Park, J.O.; Schiraldi, D.A. Fibers from polypropylene/nano carbon fiber composites. Polymer 2002, 43, 1701–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Fang, Q.; Xiong, L.; Yu, L.; Zhou, M. Analytical solutions of non-Darcy seepage of grouted subsea tunnels. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2020, 96, 103182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Giroud, J.P. Geotextiles and geomembranes. Geotext. Geomembr. 1984, 1, 5–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Niu, D.; Zhang, L.; Fu, Q.; Wen, B.; Luo, D. Critical conditions and life prediction of reinforcement corrosion in coral aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 238, 117685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ko, F.K. From textile to geotextiles. In Proceedings of the Seminar in Honour of Professor Robert Koerner, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 13 September 2004. [Google Scholar]
  125. Huang, Z.-M.; Zhang, Y.-Z.; Kotaki, M.; Ramakrishna, S. A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 2223–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Liu, X.; Fang, Q.; Zhang, D.; Liu, Y. Energy-based prediction of volume loss ratio and plastic zone dimension of shallow tunnelling. Comput. Geotech. 2020, 118, 103343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Qiu, J.L.; Lu, Y.Q.; Lai, J.X.; Zhang, Y.W.; Yang, T.; Wang, K.; Liu, T. Experimental study on the effect of water gushing on loess metro tunnel. Environ. Earth Sci. (in press).
  128. Qiu, J.L.; Lu, Y.Q.; Lai, J.X.; Guo, C.X.; Wang, K. Failure behavior investigation of loess metro tunnel under local-high-pressure water environment. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2020, 112, 4. [Google Scholar]
  129. Wang, L.X.; Li, C.H.; Qiu, J.L.; Wang, K.; Liu, T. Treatment and Effect of Loess Metro Tunnel under Surrounding Pressure and Water Immersion Environment. Geofluids. 2020, 2020, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zheng, Y.C.; Zhang, Y.H.; Wang, L.X.; Wang; K.; Liu, T. Mechanical reinforcement mechanism of steel fiber reinforced concrete and its application in tunnels. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020, 2020, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Nie, X.; Feng, S.; Zhang, S.; Gan, Q. Simulation study on the dynamic ventilation control of single head roadway in high- altitude mine based on thermal comfort. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019, 2019, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Materials 13 01774 g001 550
Figure 1. Most common polymers used as geotextiles and SEM image.
Figure 1. Most common polymers used as geotextiles and SEM image.
Materials 13 01774 g001
Materials 13 01774 g002 550
Figure 2. Separation function of geotextiles.
Figure 2. Separation function of geotextiles.
Materials 13 01774 g002
Materials 13 01774 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparison of pavement with or without geotextiles.
Figure 3. Comparison of pavement with or without geotextiles.
Materials 13 01774 g003
Materials 13 01774 g004 550
Figure 4. Filtration function of geotextiles.
Figure 4. Filtration function of geotextiles.
Materials 13 01774 g004
Materials 13 01774 g005 550
Figure 5. Drainage function of geotextiles.
Figure 5. Drainage function of geotextiles.
Materials 13 01774 g005
Materials 13 01774 g006 550
Figure 6. Subsurface drainage design with the wicking geotextiles [35].
Figure 6. Subsurface drainage design with the wicking geotextiles [35].
Materials 13 01774 g006
Materials 13 01774 g007 550
Figure 7. Reinforcement function of geotextiles.
Figure 7. Reinforcement function of geotextiles.
Materials 13 01774 g007
Materials 13 01774 g008 550
Figure 8. Some applications of geotextile reinforcement: (a) reinforcement of slopes; (b) reinforcement of embankment; (c) reinforcement of soft soil foundation; and (d) reinforcement of load transfer platforms.
Figure 8. Some applications of geotextile reinforcement: (a) reinforcement of slopes; (b) reinforcement of embankment; (c) reinforcement of soft soil foundation; and (d) reinforcement of load transfer platforms.
Materials 13 01774 g008
Materials 13 01774 g009 550
Figure 9. Global geotextile market share, by application, 2019 (%) [41,42,43].
Figure 9. Global geotextile market share, by application, 2019 (%) [41,42,43].
Materials 13 01774 g009
Materials 13 01774 g010 550
Figure 10. Chemical structure and properties of main components in plant fiber [5].
Figure 10. Chemical structure and properties of main components in plant fiber [5].
Materials 13 01774 g010
Materials 13 01774 g011 550
Figure 11. Common natural-fiber-based geotextiles: (a) jute geotextiles and (b) coir geotextiles.
Figure 11. Common natural-fiber-based geotextiles: (a) jute geotextiles and (b) coir geotextiles.
Materials 13 01774 g011
Materials 13 01774 g012 550
Figure 12. Soluble heavy metals breakthrough curves (BTCs): (a) sand alone and (b) sand + 3 flax geotextile [80].
Figure 12. Soluble heavy metals breakthrough curves (BTCs): (a) sand alone and (b) sand + 3 flax geotextile [80].
Materials 13 01774 g012
Materials 13 01774 g013 550
Figure 13. The working principle and sensing principle of Fiber Bragg grating (FBG) [104].
Figure 13. The working principle and sensing principle of Fiber Bragg grating (FBG) [104].
Materials 13 01774 g013
Materials 13 01774 g014 550
Figure 14. Intelligent geotextile based on distributed sensor.
Figure 14. Intelligent geotextile based on distributed sensor.
Materials 13 01774 g014
Materials 13 01774 g015 550
Figure 15. Intelligent geotextile based on polymer optical fiber sensor.
Figure 15. Intelligent geotextile based on polymer optical fiber sensor.
Materials 13 01774 g015
Materials 13 01774 g016 550
Figure 16. (a) intelligent geotextiles installed and (b) test site [113].
Figure 16. (a) intelligent geotextiles installed and (b) test site [113].
Materials 13 01774 g016
Table
Table 1. The properties of the most common polymers used as geotextiles [21,22].
Table 1. The properties of the most common polymers used as geotextiles [21,22].
Type of FiberSpecific Gravity (kg/m3)Modulus of Elasticity (GPa)Tensile Strength (MPa)Elongation at Break (%)Acid/AlkAli Resistance% of Total Synthetic Geotextile ProductionCorresponding Geotextile Price ($/m2)
Polypropylene (PP)9101.5–12240–90015–80High~920.22–2.5
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)14002–2.545120Low~50.15–2.0
Polyethylene (PE)920–9605–10080–6004–100High~20.11–1.2
Polyamide (PA)11401–8.375–8055–60High~10.27–1.5
Table
Table 2. Composition and properties of natural fibers commonly used to make natural geotextiles [55].
Table 2. Composition and properties of natural fibers commonly used to make natural geotextiles [55].
Type of FiberCellulose (wt%)Lignin (wt%)Hemicellulose (wt%)Density(g/m3)Strain at Break (%)Tensile Strength (MPa)Young’s Modulus (MPa)
Flax71–782.218.6–20.61.4–1.51.2–3.2345–150027.6–80
Hemp57–773.7–1314–22.41.481.6550–90070
Jute45–71.512–2613.6–211.3–1.461.5–1.8393–80010–30
Kenaf31–5715–1921.5–231.22.7–6.9295–93022–60
Ramie68.6–76.20.6–0.75–16.71.52–3.8220–93844–128
Nettle865.441.511.765038
Sisal47–787–1110–241.33–1.52–14400–7009–38
Abaca56–637–921.71.52.9430–81333.1–33.6
Cotton85–900.7–1.65.71.213–10287–5975.5–12.6
Coir36–4341–450.15–0.251.215–30175–2204–6
Table
Table 3. Natural geotextiles used for protection and its protective effect.
Table 3. Natural geotextiles used for protection and its protective effect.
Type of GeotextileApplicationEffectRef.
Palm-mat geotextilesPrevent slope soil lossPalm-mat geotextiles have obvious benefits of soil and water conservation[57]
Palm-mat geotextilesPrevention of soil erosionPalm-mat geotextiles prevent erosion and repair gullies[8]
Jute geotextilesPrevention of river bed scourIt can effectively filter and separate, and prevent the migration of fine particles in free-flowing water[58]
Coir geotextilesPrevention of river bed scourThe effect of coir geotextiles as bank protection measure is excellent[59]
Jute geotextilesPrevention of river bed scourThe life of modified JGT is 600–700 days[60]
Jute geotextilesPrevention of river bed scourThe durability of jute geotextiles treated with environmental-friendly additives is up to 4 years, and the tensile strength meets the requirements of riparian application[61]
Elephant grass, yorkgrass geotextilesPrevention of soil erosionCompared with the control, the soil loss of the two geotextiles decreased by 56.6% and 97.3% respectively, which was effective for erosion and sediment control.[62]
water hyacinth, reed, sisal, Roselle geotextilesPrevention of soil erosionSisal and Roselle have potential as raw materials of geotextile, while the fabric made of reed and water hyacinth is suitable for soil erosion control[63]
Palm-mat geotextilesDesert fixing sandPalm-mat geotextiles have excellent water retention and erosion resistance[64]
Coir, Jute geotextilesRunoff controlThe runoff control performance of jute geotextiles is better than that of coir geotextiles[65]
Coir geotextilesPrevention of soil erosionAfter 12 months of exposure to environment, the tensile strength of untreated fibers remained at 23% of the initial strength[65]
Jute geotextilesPrevention of soil erosionJute geotextiles can delay runoff time, reduce runoff 62.1% and erosion 99.4% respectively.[66]
Table
Table 4. Natural geotextile used for reinforcement and its effect.
Table 4. Natural geotextile used for reinforcement and its effect.
Type of GeotextileApplicationEffectRef.
Coir geotextilesExperimental study on bearing capacityCoir geotextiles have great potential as reinforcement material[67]
Kenaf geotextilesExperimental study on bearing capacityWhen kenaf geotextile are used in sandy soil, the bearing capacity of sandy soil is 414.9% higher than that of untreated soil[68]
Jute geotextiles Construction of rural roadsCompared with the part without geotextile, jute geotextiles can increase the road strength by 67–73%[69]
Coir geotextilesReinforcement of SubgradeBy using coir geotextiles, CBR improvement factor can reach 1.5 to 2.2[70]
Kenaf geotextilesReinforcement of full-size embankment on soft clayKenaf geotextiles can be used for short-term reinforcement of soil on soft clay[71]
Jute geotextilesReinforcement of SubgradeThe long-term durability of jute geotextiles is not particularly crucial for the stability of subgrade reinforcement[72]
Coir geotextilesReinforcement of soft soil foundationCoir geotextiles have potential application value in strengthening soft soil foundation[73]
Coir geotextilesReinforcement of SubgradeThe CBR value of subgrade increases by about 50%[74]
Table
Table 5. Study on improving the properties of natural geotextiles.
Table 5. Study on improving the properties of natural geotextiles.
MethodType of GeotextileResearchEffectRef.
Chemical modificationjute geotextilesEsterification of Jute geotextilesStretching and chemical degradation resistance enhanced[84,85]
coir geotextilesDurability studies of surface-modified coir geotextilesThe surface-modified geotextiles retained more than 70% of their initial tensile strength after burial in the top layer of soil after one year.[87,88,89]
jute geotextilesLaccase treatment of Jute GeotextilesPhysical properties and surface hydrophobicity are improved[90]
jute geotextilesTreatment of Jute Geotextiles with Isothiazolinone and Fluorocarbon DerivativesImprovement of Antimicrobial and Water-proof Performance[60]
coir geotextilesLime-treatmentLime treatment promotes the initial retention of cellulose in natural fibers[11]
Kenaf geotextilesalkaline treatedCompared with untreated kenaf geotextile, the tensile strength of the geotextile treated with 6% NaOH is increased by 51.0%[81]
Blending synthetic fiberNettle/PLA geotextilesTests on tensile strength, biodegradability and soil fertility enhancementthe geotextiles is promising for slope stabilization application[82]
jute/polypropylenegeotextilesTreatment of Jute/PP Nonwoven Geotextile with AlkaliTensile properties and puncture resistance were improved[54,55]
jute/polypropylenegeotextilesMechanical Properties and Damage Analysis of Jute/Polypropylene Nonwoven GeotextileCompared with PP geotextiles, 40/60 jute/PP geotextiles have higher tensile strength and secant modulus[91]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, H.; Yao, C.; Li, C.; Miao, M.; Zhong, Y.; Lu, Y.; Liu, T. Review of Application and Innovation of Geotextiles in Geotechnical Engineering. Materials 2020, 13, 1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071774

AMA Style

Wu H, Yao C, Li C, Miao M, Zhong Y, Lu Y, Liu T. Review of Application and Innovation of Geotextiles in Geotechnical Engineering. Materials. 2020; 13(7):1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071774

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Hao, Chongkai Yao, Chenghan Li, Miao Miao, Yujian Zhong, Yuquan Lu, and Tong Liu. 2020. "Review of Application and Innovation of Geotextiles in Geotechnical Engineering" Materials 13, no. 7: 1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071774

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop