Next Article in Journal
Optimal Derivative-Free Root Finding Methods Based on Inverse Interpolation
Next Article in Special Issue
An Efficient Numerical Technique for the Nonlinear Fractional Kolmogorov–Petrovskii–Piskunov Equation
Previous Article in Journal
The First Eigenvalue Estimates of Warped Product Pseudo-Slant Submanifolds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Global Asymptotical Stability Analysis for Fractional Neural Networks with Time-Varying Delays
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Certain Hermite–Hadamard Inequalities for Logarithmically Convex Functions with Applications

1
Department of Mathematics, Poornima College of Engineering, Jaipur 302022, India
2
Département de Mathématiques, Facultée des sciences de Tunis, Université Tunis El Manar, Tunis 1068, Tunisia
3
Dèpartement de Mathématiques, Issat Kasserine, Université de Kairouan, Kairouan 3100, Tunisia
4
Department of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Faculty of Art and Sciences, Çankaya University, Balgat 0630, Turkey
5
Department of Mathematics, Anand International College of Engineering, Jaipur 303012, India
6
Department of Mathematics, Harish-Chandra Research Institute (HRI), Allahbad 211019, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2019, 7(2), 163; https://doi.org/10.3390/math7020163
Submission received: 12 November 2018 / Revised: 27 January 2019 / Accepted: 28 January 2019 / Published: 11 February 2019

Abstract

:
In this paper, we discuss various estimates to the right-hand (resp. left-hand) side of the Hermite–Hadamard inequality for functions whose absolute values of the second (resp. first) derivatives to positive real powers are log-convex. As an application, we derive certain inequalities involving the q-digamma and q-polygamma functions, respectively. As a consequence, new inequalities for the q-analogue of the harmonic numbers in terms of the q-polygamma functions are derived. Moreover, several inequalities for special means are also considered.

1. Introduction

In recent years, because of the importance of the relationship between inequalities and convexity, the study of the Hermite–Hadamard’s inequality has attracted much attention due to applications of convex functions (for details see [1,2]).
A function f : I R R is convex. Then, for a , b I , a < b , we have
f a + b 2 1 b a a b f ( t ) d t f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 .
A function f : [ a , b ] R ( 0 , ) is log-convex. Then, for x , y [ a , b ] and t [ 0 , 1 ] , we have
f ( t x + ( 1 t ) y ) [ f ( x ) ] t [ f ( y ) ] 1 t .
If the above inequality is reversed then f is called a log-concave function. It is also known that if g is differentiable, then f is log-convex (log-concave) if and only if f / f is increasing (decreasing). It is easy to see this by the arithmetic-mean–geometric-mean (AM–GM) inequality
[ f ( x ) ] t [ f ( y ) ] 1 t t f ( x ) + ( 1 t ) f ( y ) ,
for all x , y I and t [ 0 , 1 ] , i.e., the set of log-convex functions is a proper subset of the class of convex functions.
The main idea of this paper is motivated by the above results. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we first present some lemmas which are used in the main results. Then, we present some estimates to the left-hand side and right-hand side of Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for functions whose absolute values of the first and second derivatives to positive real powers are log-convex. In Section 3, we derive some inequalities for q-digamma and q-polygamma functions by applying the main results of Section 2 and deducing some of them for the q-analogue harmonic numbers. Moreover, several inequalities for special means are derived. In Section 3, our aim is to apply the idea taken in the previous section for the q-digamma and q-polygamma functions and the classical Hermite–Hadamard inequalities (1). As applications, we show new lower and upper bounds for the q-analogue of the harmonic numbers in terms of the q-trigamma function. Moreover, some inequalities for the harmonic numbers and Euler–Mascheroni constant are presented.

2. Main Results

In this section, we establish our main results, but first we briefly recall some basic well-known results which will be used in the sequel.
Lemma 1
([3]). Let f : I = [ a , b ] R R be a differentiable mapping on I 0 , with a < b , then
f ( b ) + f ( a ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x = ( b a ) 2 2 0 1 t ( 1 t ) f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) d t .
Lemma 2
([4]). Let f : I = [ a , b ] R R be a differentiable mapping on I 0 , with a < b , then
1 b a a b f ( x ) d x f a + b 2 = ( b a ) 0 1 / 2 t f ( b + ( a b ) t ) d t + 1 / 2 1 ( t 1 ) f ( b + ( a b ) t ) d t .
Theorem 1.
Let f : I 0 = [ a , b ] R be a twice differentiable mapping on I 0 with a < b . If | f | q , q 1 is log-convex on [ a , b ] , such that | f ( a ) | 1 , and | f ( b ) | 1 , then the inequality holds
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x ( b a ) 2 2 1 6 1 1 q 1 q 3 1 q × [ 2 ( 1 | f ( a ) | α q ) + α q log | f ( a ) | 1 + | f ( a ) | α q α 4 log 3 | f ( a ) | + 2 ( 1 | f ( b ) | β q ) + β q log | f ( b ) | 1 + | f ( b ) | β q β 4 log 3 | f ( b ) | ] 1 q ,
where α , β > 1 such that 1 α + 1 β = 1 .
Proof. 
Let q = 1 and by means of Lemma 1 and known result [5] (p. 4), we have
x y x α α + y β β , x , y 0
where α , β > 1 such that 1 α + 1 β = 1 , we find that
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x ( b a ) 2 2 0 1 t ( 1 t ) | f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | d t ( b a ) 2 2 0 1 t ( 1 t ) | f ( a ) | t | f ( b ) | 1 t d t ( b a ) 2 2 0 1 t ( 1 t ) | f ( a ) | α t α + | f ( b ) | β ( 1 t ) β d t = ( b a ) 2 2 0 1 t ( 1 t ) | f ( a ) | α t α d t + 0 1 t ( 1 t ) | f ( b ) | β ( 1 t ) β d t = I 11 α + | f ( b ) | β I 12 β .
Now, by using the following formula
0 1 t ( 1 t ) e σ t d t = e σ + 1 σ 2 + 2 ( 1 e σ ) σ 3 , if σ 0 1 6 , if σ = 0
with σ = α log | f ( a ) | and σ = β log | f ( b ) | in I 11 and I 12 , respectively, we get
I 11 = 2 ( 1 | f ( a ) | α ) + α log | f ( a ) | 1 + | f ( a ) | α α 3 log 3 | f ( a ) | ,
and
I 12 = 2 ( 1 | f ( b ) | β ) + β log | f ( b ) | 1 + | f ( b ) | β β 3 | f ( b ) | β log 3 | f ( b ) | .
Now, suppose that q > 1 .
Next by considering the Hölder–Rogers inequality,
a b | f ( t ) g ( t ) | d t a b | f ( t ) | p d t 1 p a b | g ( t ) | q d t 1 q ,
for q , p = q q 1 , we get
0 1 t ( 1 t ) | f ( a ) | t | f ( b ) | 1 t d t = 0 1 t ( 1 t ) 1 1 q t ( 1 t ) 1 q | f ( a ) | t | f ( b ) | 1 t d t 0 1 t ( 1 t ) 1 1 q 0 1 t ( 1 t ) | f ( a ) | q t | f ( b ) | q ( 1 t ) d t 1 q 1 6 1 1 q 0 1 t ( 1 t ) | f ( a ) | α q t α + | f ( b ) | β q ( 1 t ) β d t 1 q = 1 6 1 1 q I q 1 α + | f ( b ) | β q I q 2 β 1 q .
Again, by using the formula (8), with α = α q log | f ( a ) | and α = β q log | f ( b ) | , respectively, we obtain
I q 1 = 2 ( 1 | f ( a ) | α q ) + α q log | f ( a ) | 1 + | f ( a ) | α q ( α q ) 3 log 3 | f ( a ) |
and
I q 2 = 2 ( 1 | f ( b ) | β q ) + β q log | f ( b ) | 1 + | f ( b ) | β q ( β q ) 3 | f ( b ) | β q log 3 | f ( b ) | ,
hence, we get (5).  □
Remark 1.
In view of the inequalities (5) and (8) when | f ( a ) | = 1 , we deduced that the inequality (5) reduces to
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x ( b a ) 2 2 1 6 1 1 q 1 q 3 1 q × 1 6 α + 2 ( 1 | f ( b ) | β q ) + β q log | f ( b ) | 1 + | f ( b ) | β q β 4 log 3 | f ( b ) | 1 q .
In the case when | f ( b ) | = 1 , the inequality (5) reduce to
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x ( b a ) 2 2 1 6 1 1 q 1 q 3 1 q × 1 6 β + 2 ( 1 | f ( a ) | α q ) + α q log | f ( a ) | 1 + | f ( a ) | α q α 4 log 3 | f ( a ) | 1 q
A similar result is embodied in this theorem. The beta function and gamma function are defined by
B ( x , y ) = 0 1 t x 1 ( 1 t ) y 1 d t , x , y > 0 and γ ( x ) = 0 t x 1 e x d t , x > 0 .
The beta function satisfies the following properties:
B ( x , y ) = Γ ( x ) Γ ( y ) Γ ( x + y ) , B ( x , x ) = 2 1 2 x B 1 2 , x .
In particular,
B ( p + 1 , p + 1 ) = π Γ ( p + 1 ) 2 2 p + 1 Γ p + 3 2 .
Theorem 2.
Let f : I 0 = [ a , b ] R be a twice differentiable mapping on I 0 with a < b . If | f | q , q > 1 is log-convex on [ a , b ] , such that | f ( a ) | 1 ,and | f ( b ) | 1 , then
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x ( b a ) 2 2 π Γ ( p + 1 ) 2 2 p + 1 Γ p + 3 2 1 p | f ( a ) | α q 1 α 2 q log | f ( a ) | + | f ( b ) | β q 1 β 2 q log | f ( b ) | 1 q ,
where p = q q 1 and α , β > 1 such that 1 α + 1 β = 1 .
Proof. 
By Lemma 1, we have
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x ( b a ) 2 2 0 1 t ( 1 t ) | f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | d t .
Since | f | q is convex on [ a , b ] for all q > 1 , we know that for any t [ 0 , 1 ] ,
| f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | q | f ( a ) | t q | f ( b ) | q ( 1 t )
So, by using the Hölder–Rogers inequality (9) and the arithmetic-mean–geometric-mean (AM–GM) inequality (6), we have
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x ( b a ) 2 2 0 1 [ t ( 1 t ) ] p d t 1 p 0 1 | f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | q d t 1 q ( b a ) 2 2 0 1 [ t ( 1 t ) ] p d t 1 p 0 1 | f ( a ) | q t | f ( b ) | q ( 1 t ) d t 1 q ( b a ) 2 2 Γ 2 ( p + 1 ) Γ ( 2 p + 2 ) 1 p 0 1 | f ( a ) | α q t α + | f ( b ) | β q ( 1 t ) β d t 1 q = ( b a ) 2 2 Γ 2 ( p + 1 ) Γ ( 2 p + 2 ) 1 p 0 1 | f ( a ) | α q t α d t + 0 1 | f ( b ) | β q ( 1 t ) β d t 1 q = ( b a ) 2 2 Γ 2 ( p + 1 ) Γ ( 2 p + 2 ) 1 p | f ( a ) | α q 1 α 2 q log | f ( a ) | + | f ( b ) | β q 1 β 2 q log | f ( b ) | 1 q = ( b a ) 2 2 π Γ ( p + 1 ) 2 2 p + 1 Γ p + 3 2 1 p | f ( a ) | α q 1 α 2 q log | f ( a ) | + | f ( b ) | β q 1 β 2 q log | f ( b ) | 1 q .
The desired inequality (13) is thus established.  □
Remark 2.
If | f ( x ) | > 1 , for all x [ a , b ] . Assume that the hypotheses of the Theorem 2 are satisfied. Then in view of
x 1 log ( x ) < x , x > 1 ,
and (13), we have
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x ( b a ) 2 2 π Γ ( p + 1 ) 2 2 p + 1 Γ p + 3 2 1 p | f ( a ) | α q α + | f ( b ) | β q β 1 q ,
where p = q q 1 and α , β > 1 such that 1 α + 1 β = 1 .
Theorem 3.
With the assumptions of Theorem 2, we have
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x ( b a ) 2 2 q 1 + 1 q γ 1 q ( q + 1 , 1 ) ( p + 1 ) 1 p | f ( a ) | α q α q + 2 log q + 1 | f ( a ) | + ( 1 ) q + 1 β q + 2 log q + 1 | f ( b ) | 1 q ,
where 1 p + 1 q = 1 , 1 α + 1 β = 1 and γ ( a , z ) is the incomplete gamma function
γ ( a , z ) = 0 z t a 1 e t d t .
Proof. 
From Lemma 1, Hölder’s inequality, and the AM–GM inequality (6), we get
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x ( b a ) 2 2 0 1 t ( 1 t ) | f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | d t ( b a ) 2 2 0 1 t p d t 1 p 0 1 ( 1 t ) q | f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | q d t 1 q ( b a ) 2 2 0 1 t p d t 1 p 0 1 ( 1 t ) q | f ( a ) | q t | f ( b ) | q ( 1 t ) d t 1 q ( b a ) 2 2 1 p + 1 1 p 0 1 ( 1 t ) q | f ( a ) | α q t | α + f ( b ) | β q ( 1 t ) β 1 q .
On the other hand, by using the fact
0 1 ( 1 t ) q e σ t d t = γ ( q + 1 , 1 ) e σ σ q + 1 i f σ 0 , 1 q + 1 i f σ = 0 ,
we obtain
0 1 ( 1 t ) q | f ( a ) | α q t d t = | f ( a ) | α q γ ( q + 1 , 1 ) α q log | f ( a ) | q + 1 ,
and
0 1 ( 1 t ) q | f ( b ) | β q ( 1 t ) d t = γ ( q + 1 , 1 ) β q log | f ( b ) | q + 1 .
Finally, in view of (20), (22) and (23), we deduce the inequality (19).  □
Remark 3.
If | f ( a ) | = 1 , then the inequality (19) reduces to the following inequality:
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x ( b a ) 2 2 1 p + 1 1 p 1 α ( q + 1 ) + ( 1 ) q + 1 γ ( q + 1 , 1 ) β q log | f ( b ) | q + 1 1 q
Moreover, in the case when | f ( b ) | = 1 , then
f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x ( b a ) 2 2 1 p + 1 1 p | f ( a ) | α q γ ( q + 1 , 1 ) α q log | f ( a ) | q + 1 + 1 β ( q + 1 ) 1 q ,
is true.
Theorem 4.
Let f : I 0 = [ a , b ] R be a differentiable mapping on I 0 with a < b . If | f | q , q > 1 is log-convex on [ a , b ] , such that | f ( a ) | 1 ,and | f ( b ) | 1 , then
1 b a a b f ( t ) f a + b 2 ( b a ) 1 2 p + 1 ( p + 1 ) 1 p [ | f ( a ) | α q 2 1 α 2 q log | f ( a ) | + | f ( b ) | β q 2 ( | f ( b ) | β q 2 1 ) β 2 q log | f ( b ) | 1 q + | f ( a ) | α q 2 | f ( a ) | α q 2 1 α 2 q log | f ( a ) | + | f ( b ) | β q 2 1 β 2 q log | f ( b ) | 1 q ]
holds for all p , q , α , β > 1 such that 1 p + 1 q = 1 and 1 α + 1 β = 1 .
Proof. 
From Lemma 2, we get
1 b a a b f ( x ) d x f a + b 2 ( b a ) 0 1 / 2 t | f ( b + ( a b ) t ) | d t + 1 / 2 1 | ( t 1 ) f ( b + ( a b ) t ) | d t ( b a ) 0 1 / 2 t | f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | d t + 1 / 2 1 ( 1 t ) | f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | d t .
On the other hand, by using the Hölder–Rogers inequality (9) and the AM–GM inequality (6), we obtain
0 1 / 2 t | f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | d t 0 1 / 2 t p d t 1 p 0 1 / 2 | f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | q d t 1 q 1 2 p + 1 ( p + 1 ) 1 p 0 1 / 2 | f ( a ) | t q | f ( b ) | ( 1 t ) q d t 1 q 1 2 p + 1 ( p + 1 ) 1 p 0 1 / 2 | f ( a ) | α t q α + | f ( b ) | β ( 1 t ) q β d t 1 q = 1 2 p + 1 ( p + 1 ) 1 p | f ( a ) | α q 2 1 α 2 q log | f ( a ) | + | f ( b ) | β q 2 ( | f ( b ) | β q 2 1 ) β 2 q log | f ( b ) | 1 q
Similarly, we get
1 / 2 1 ( 1 t ) | f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | d t 1 / 2 1 ( 1 t ) p d t 1 p 1 / 2 1 | f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | q d t 1 q 1 2 p + 1 ( p + 1 ) 1 p 1 / 2 1 | f ( a ) | t q | f ( b ) | ( 1 t ) q d t 1 q 1 2 p + 1 ( p + 1 ) 1 p 1 / 2 1 | f ( a ) | α t q α + | f ( b ) | β ( 1 t ) q β d t 1 q = 1 2 p + 1 ( p + 1 ) 1 p | f ( a ) | α q 2 | f ( a ) | α q 2 1 α 2 q log | f ( a ) | + | f ( b ) | β q 2 1 β 2 q log | f ( b ) | 1 q ,
which implies (19).  □
Remark 4.
Let the assumptions of Theorem 4 be satisfied, with | f ( x ) | > 1 for all x [ a , b ] . In view of (26) and (17), we get
1 b a a b f ( t ) f a + b 2 ( b a ) 2 1 q 1 2 p + 1 ( p + 1 ) 1 p | f ( a ) | α q 2 α + | f ( b ) | β q β 1 q + | f ( a ) | α q α + | f ( b ) | β q 2 β 1 q ,
with 1 p + 1 q = 1 and 1 α + 1 β = 1 .
Theorem 5.
Let f : I 0 = [ a , b ] R be a differentiable mapping on I 0 with a < b . If | f | is log-convex on [ a , b ] , such that | f ( a ) | 1 and | f ( b ) | 1 , then
1 b a a b f ( t ) f a + b 2 ( b a ) | f ( a ) | α 2 1 α 3 2 log | f ( a ) | 2 + | f ( b ) | β 2 1 β 3 2 log | f ( b ) | 2 .
Proof. 
Since | f | is, in fact, log-convex and due to the AM–GM inequality (6), we successively get
0 1 2 t | f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | d t 0 1 2 t | f ( a ) | t | f ( b ) | 1 t d t 0 1 2 t | f ( a ) | α t α + | f ( b ) | β ( 1 t ) β d t = 1 4 0 1 t | f ( a ) | α t 2 α d t + | f ( b ) | β β 0 1 t | f ( b ) | β t 2 d t .
So, along with the identity
0 1 t e σ t d t = σ e σ e σ + 1 σ 2 , σ 0 ,
we get
0 1 t | f ( a ) | α t 2 α d t = 2 | f ( a ) | α 2 α 2 log | f ( a ) | 4 ( | f ( a ) | α 2 1 ) α 3 log 2 | f ( a ) |
and
0 1 t | f ( b ) | β t 2 d t = 2 β | f ( b ) | β 2 log | f ( b ) | 2 | f ( b ) | β 2 1 β log | f ( b ) | 1 .
Therefore,
0 1 2 t | f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | d t 1 4 2 | f ( a ) | α 2 α 2 log | f ( a ) | 4 ( | f ( a ) | α 2 1 ) α 3 log 2 | f ( a ) | + 2 | f ( b ) | β 2 β 2 log | f ( b ) | 2 | f ( b ) | β 2 1 β log | f ( b ) | 1 .
Also from the AM–GM inequality (6), and since the function | f | is log-convex, we get
1 2 1 | ( t 1 ) f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | d t 1 2 1 ( 1 t ) | f ( a ) | t | f ( b ) | 1 t d t 1 2 1 ( 1 t ) | f ( a ) | α t α + | f ( b ) | β ( 1 t ) β d t .
Taking the values σ = α log | f ( a ) | and σ = β log | f ( b ) | respectively, in the following formula
1 2 1 ( 1 t ) e σ t = 2 e σ ( 2 + σ ) e σ 2 2 σ 2 if σ 0 ,
we deduce
1 2 1 ( 1 t ) | f ( a ) | α t d t = | f ( a ) | α | f ( a ) | α 2 α 2 log 2 | f ( a ) | | f ( a ) | α 2 2 α log | f ( a ) | ,
and
1 2 1 ( 1 t ) | f ( b ) | β ( 1 t ) d t = 1 | f ( b ) | β 2 β 2 log 2 | f ( b ) | + | f ( b ) | β 2 2 β log | f ( b ) | .
In view of (36), (38) and (39), we can easily get the following inequality
1 2 1 | ( t 1 ) f ( t a + ( 1 t ) b ) | d t | f ( a ) | α | f ( a ) | α 2 α 3 log 2 | f ( a ) | | f ( a ) | α 2 2 α 2 log | f ( a ) | + 1 | f ( b ) | β 2 β 3 log 2 | f ( b ) | + | f ( b ) | β 2 2 β 2 log | f ( b ) | .
Taking into account Lemma 2 along with (35) and (40), we obtain (30).  □
Remark 5.
Suppose that | f ( x ) | > 1 , for all x [ a , b ] . By combining the inequalities (17) and (30), we obtain
1 b a a b f ( t ) f a + b 2 ( b a ) 4 | f ( a ) | α α + | f ( b ) | β β .

3. Applications

3.1. Applications to Special Means

Here, we demonstrate new inequalities connecting the above means for arbitrary real numbers.
  • The arithmetic mean:
    A = A ( a , b ) = a + b 2 ; a , b R , with a , b > 0 .
  • The geometric mean:
    G = G ( a , b ) = a b ; a , b R , with a , b > 0 .
  • The logarithmic mean:
    L ( a , b ) = b a log b log a .
  • The generalized logarithmic mean:
    L n ( a , b ) = b n + 1 a n + 1 ( b a ) ( n + 1 ) 1 n ; n Z { 1 , 0 } , a , b R , with a , b > 0 .
We use the following notations throughout this section:
α = β = 1 2 , N = 1 , 2 , 3 , , Z = , 2 , 1 , 0 , 1 , 2 , , Z = , 2 , 1 , 0 .
Proposition 1.
Let a , b , q be real numbers such that 0 < a < b , q > 1 and n Z { 1 , 0 } , then the inequality holds
A a n , b n L n n a , b min ( K 1 , K 2 ) ( b a ) 2 4 ,
where
K 1 = π Γ ( p + 1 ) 4 p Γ p + 3 2 1 p n ( n 1 ) a 2 ( n 2 ) q 1 log ( n ( n 1 ) ) + ( n 2 ) log ( a ) + n ( n 1 ) b 2 ( n 2 ) q 1 log ( n ( n 1 ) ) + ( n 2 ) log ( b ) 1 q K 2 = γ ( q + 1 , 1 ) 2 2 ( q + 1 ) q 2 ( q + 1 ) 1 q 1 p + 1 1 p n ( n 1 ) a n 2 log ( n ( n 1 ) ) + ( n 2 ) log ( a ) q + 1 + ( 1 ) q + 1 log ( n ( n 1 ) ) + ( n 2 ) log ( b ) q + 1 1 q ,
with p = q q 1 .
Proof. 
Apply f ( x ) = x n , x [ a , b ] and n Z { 1 , 0 } in Theorems 2 and 3.  □
Proposition 2.
Let a , b , q be a real number such that 0 < a < b , and q > 1 . Then, the inequality holds:
A ( a 1 , b 1 L 1 ( a , b ) min ( K 3 , K 4 ) ( b a ) 2 4 ,
where
K 3 = π Γ ( p + 1 ) 4 p Γ p + 3 2 1 p 2 a 3 2 q 1 log ( 2 a 3 ) + 2 b 3 2 q 1 log ( 2 b 3 ) 1 q K 4 = γ ( q + 1 , 1 ) 2 2 ( q + 1 ) q 2 ( q + 1 ) 1 q 1 p + 1 1 p 2 a 3 2 q log ( 2 a 3 ) q + 1 + ( 1 ) q + 1 log ( 2 b 3 ) q + 1 1 q ,
with p = q q 1 .
Proof. 
Apply f ( x ) = 1 x , x [ a , b ] in Theorems 2 and 3.  □

3.2. Inequalities for Some Special Functions

Let 0 < q < 1 , the q-digamma function ψ q , is the q-analogue of the psi or digamma function ψ defined by
ψ q ( x ) = ln ( 1 q ) + ln q k = 0 q k + x 1 q k + x = ln ( 1 q ) + ln q k = 1 q k x 1 q k .
For q > 1 and x > 0 , the q-digamma function ψ q is defined by
ψ q ( x ) = ln ( q 1 ) + ln q x 1 2 k = 0 q ( k + x ) 1 q ( k + x ) = ln ( q 1 ) + ln q x 1 2 k = 1 q k x 1 q k x .
In [6], it was shown that lim q 1 + ψ q ( x ) = lim q 1 ψ q ( x ) = ψ ( x ) .
The nth derivative of the q-digamma function is called the q-polygamma function and can be defined as
ψ q ( n ) ( x ) = d n d x n ψ q ( x ) , x > 0 , 0 < q < 1 .
We recall that a function f is said to be completely monotonic on an interval I, if f has derivatives of all orders on I and ( 1 ) n f ( n ) ( x ) 0 , for all x I and all integers n 0 . These functions have important applications in probability and numerical analysis.
Proposition 3.
Let a , b , q , q be real numbers such that 0 < a < b , q > 1 and 0 < q < 1 . Then the following inequality
ψ q ( b ) + ψ q ( a ) 2 ψ q ( b ) ψ q ( a ) b a ( b a ) 2 16 π Γ ( p + 1 ) Γ p + 3 2 1 p | ψ q ( 3 ) ( a ) | 2 q 1 2 q log | ψ q ( 3 ) ( a ) | + | ψ q ( 3 ) ( b ) | 2 q 1 2 q log | ψ q ( 3 ) ( b ) | 1 q ,
holds true for all x > 0 and p = q q 1 .
Proof. 
By using the definition of the q-digamma function, we deduce that the q-trigamma function f ( x ) = ψ q ( x ) is a completely monotonic function on ( 0 , ) . This implies that the function ψ q ( 3 ) ( x ) is also completely monotonic on ( 0 , ) for each q ( 0 , 1 ) , and consequently is log-convex, since every completely monotonic function is log-convex, (see [7] (p. 167)). So, Theorem 2 completes the proof of Proposition 3.  □
Proposition 4.
Let 0 < a < b and q ( 0 , 1 ) . Then the inequality holds,
ψ q ( b ) ψ q ( a ) b a ψ q a + b 2 ( b a ) 2 8 | ψ q ( 2 ) ( a ) | 1 log | ψ q ( 2 ) ( a ) | 2 + | ψ q ( 2 ) ( b ) | 1 log | ψ q ( 2 ) ( b ) | 2 .
Proof. 
The inequality (46) follows immediately from Theorem 5 when f = ψ q .  □
As another application of inequality (46) we can provide the following inequalities for the q-triagamma and q-polygamma functions and the q-analogue of harmonic numbers H n q defined by
H n q = k = 1 n q k 1 q k , n N .
So, in view of inequality (46) and using the equation
ψ q ( n + 1 ) = ψ q ( 1 ) log ( q ) H n q , n N ,
we obtain the following result.
Corollary 1.
Let n N and 0 < q < 1 . Then, the following inequality
log ( q ) H n q n ψ q n 2 + 1 n 2 8 | ψ q ( 2 ) ( 1 ) | 1 log | ψ q ( 2 ) ( 1 ) | 2 + | ψ q ( 2 ) ( n + 1 ) | 1 log | ψ q ( 2 ) ( n + 1 ) | 2
holds true.
Proposition 5.
Let n be a integer number. Then the inequality holds,
H n ψ n 2 + 1 n 2 8 | ψ ( 2 ) ( 1 ) | 1 log | ψ ( 2 ) ( 1 ) | 2 + | ψ ( 2 ) ( n + 1 ) | 1 log | ψ ( 2 ) ( n + 1 ) | 2
where H n is a harmonic number.
Proof. 
By virtue of inequality (49) when q 1 , and using the relation
lim q 1 log ( q ) H n q = lim q 1 log ( q ) q 1 ( q 1 ) H n q = lim q 1 ( q 1 ) H n q = lim q 1 k = 1 n 1 q 1 q k = H n ,
we obtain the desired result.  □
Remark 6.
By using the equation
H n = γ + ψ ( n + 1 ) ,
where γ is the Euler–Mascheroni constant, the inequality (50) can be read as
γ + ψ ( n + 1 ) ψ n 2 + 1 n 2 8 | ψ ( 2 ) ( 1 ) | 1 log | ψ ( 2 ) ( 1 ) | 2 + | ψ ( 2 ) ( n + 1 ) | 1 log | ψ ( 2 ) ( n + 1 ) | 2 .
We conclude our investigation by applying the methods which were developed in Section 2, for the classical Hermite–Hadamard inequalities. Since the q-trigamma function ψ q ( x ) is completely monotonic on ( 0 , ) for each q ( 0 , 1 ) , and consequently is convex on ( 0 , ) . Then we get
ψ q a + b 2 ψ q ( b ) ψ q ( a ) b a ψ q ( b ) + ψ q ( a ) 2 .
In particular, we obtain the following inequalities for the q-analogue of harmonic numbers
ψ q n 2 + 1 log ( q ) H n q n ψ q ( n + 1 ) + ψ q ( 1 ) 2 , n N .
Letting q 1 , in the above inequalities, we obtain the new inequality for the harmonic number H n ,
ψ n 2 + 1 H n n π 2 + 6 ψ ( n + 1 ) 12 .
Now, combining the inequalities (56) and (52), we get the two-sided bounding inequalities for the Euler–Mascheroni constant:
n ψ n 2 + 1 ψ ( n + 1 ) γ n ( π 2 + 6 ψ ( n + 1 ) ) 12 ψ ( n + 1 ) 12 .

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally.

Funding

No specific funding was received for this project.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks to the worthy referees and editor for their valuable suggestions for our paper in Mathematics. This work was supported by under the first author research grant supported by SERB Project Number: MTR/2017/000194 and fourth author research grant supported by SERB Project Number: TAR/2018/000001

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agarwal, P.; Dragomir, S.S.; Jleli, M.; Samet, B. Advances in Mathematical Inequalities and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mehrez, K.; Agarwal, P. New Hermite–Hadamard type integral inequalities for convex functions and their applications. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2019, 350, 274–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Saglam, A.; Yildirim, H. New inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard type for functions whose second derivatives absolute values are convex and quasi-convex. IJOPCM 2012, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kirmaci, U.S.; Özdemir, M.E. Some inequalities for mappings whose derivatives are bounded and applications to special means of real numbers. Appl. Math. Lett. 2004, 17, 641–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mitrinović, D.S. Analytic Inequalities; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  6. Krattenthaler, C.; Srivastava, H.M. Summations for basic hypergeometric series involving a q-anologue of thedigamma function. Comput. Math. Appl. 1996, 32, 73–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Widder, D.V. The Laplace Transform; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1941. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jain, S.; Mehrez, K.; Baleanu, D.; Agarwal, P. Certain Hermite–Hadamard Inequalities for Logarithmically Convex Functions with Applications. Mathematics 2019, 7, 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7020163

AMA Style

Jain S, Mehrez K, Baleanu D, Agarwal P. Certain Hermite–Hadamard Inequalities for Logarithmically Convex Functions with Applications. Mathematics. 2019; 7(2):163. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7020163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jain, Shilpi, Khaled Mehrez, Dumitru Baleanu, and Praveen Agarwal. 2019. "Certain Hermite–Hadamard Inequalities for Logarithmically Convex Functions with Applications" Mathematics 7, no. 2: 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7020163

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop