Next Article in Journal
Candida glabrata: A Lot More Than Meets the Eye
Next Article in Special Issue
Erratum: Mpanga, I.K.; et al. The Form of N Supply Determines Plant Growth Promotion by P-Solubilizing Microorganisms in Maize. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 38
Previous Article in Journal
Fungal Endophyte Communities of Three Agricultural Important Grass Species Differ in Their Response Towards Management Regimes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 7
Issue 2
10.3390/microorganisms7020038
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Erratum published on 25 April 2019, see Microorganisms 2019, 7(4), 111.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Form of N Supply Determines Plant Growth Promotion by P-Solubilizing Microorganisms in Maize

by
Isaac Kwadwo Mpanga
1,*,
Peteh Mehdi Nkebiwe
1,
Mira Kuhlmann
1,
Vincenza Cozzolino
2,
Alessandro Piccolo
2,
Jörg Geistlinger
3,
Nils Berger
4,
Uwe Ludewig
1 and
Günter Neumann
1
1
Institute of Crop Science (340h), Universität Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 20, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
2
Department of Agriculture, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Napoli, Italy
3
Institute of Bioanalytical Sciences, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, 06406 Bernburg, Germany
4
Eurochem Agro GmbH, 68165 Mannheim, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2019, 7(2), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7020038
Submission received: 28 December 2018 / Revised: 16 January 2019 / Accepted: 26 January 2019 / Published: 29 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Response of Microorganisms to Anthropogenic Disturbance and Global Change)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Phosphate-(P)-solubilizing microorganisms (PSM) are important drivers of P cycling in natural and agro-ecosystems. Their use as plant inoculants to improve P acquisition of crops has been investigated for decades. However, limited reproducibility of the expected effects, particularly under field conditions, remains a major challenge. This study demonstrates that the form of nitrogen fertilization has a significant impact on the performance of various fungal and bacterial PSM inoculants in maize grown on neutral to alkaline soils with limited P availability. Under these conditions, a high soil pH-buffering capacity frequently limits the efficiency of nutrient mobilization, mediated by plant roots and microorganisms via rhizosphere acidification. In a soil pH range between 7.0 and 8.0, nitrate fertilization promoting rhizosphere alkalinisation further aggravates this problem. Accordingly, in greenhouse experiments, six strains of Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Streptomyces, and Penicillium with proven P-solubilizing potential, completely failed to promote P acquisition in maize grown on a calcareous Loess sub-soil pH 7.6 with nitrate fertilization and rock phosphate (Rock-P) as a sparingly soluble P source. However, after replacement of nitrate fertilization by ammonium, stabilized with the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole-phosphate (DMPP), five out of seven investigated PSM inoculants (comprising 12 fungal and bacterial PSM strains) exerted beneficial effects on plant growth and reached up to 88% of the shoot biomass production of a control supplied with soluble triple-superphosphate (TSP). Stabilized ammonium combined with PSM-inoculants improved P acquisition (Trichoderma harzianum T22, Pseudomonas sp. DMSZ 13134), while other strains particularly stimulated root growth (T. harzianum OMG16, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42), which promoted the acquisition also of other mineral nutrients, such as N, K, and Mn. A similar effect was recorded under field conditions on an alkaline clay-loam soil pH 8.6. The combination of stabilized ammonium with a range of consortium products based on T. harzianum OMG16, B. amyloliquefaciens, micronutrients, and humic acids completely compensated the effect of a TSP fertilization on field establishment, nutrient acquisition, and yield formation in maize, while non-stabilized urea-di-ammonium phosphate fertilization was largely ineffective. These findings suggest that the efficiency of PSM-plant interactions can be influenced by the form of N fertilization, offering promising perspectives for synergistic effects with stabilized ammonium fertilizers.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Phosphorous (P) is the least soluble and consequently the least bio-available soil macronutrient, for higher plants. It is taken up by plant roots exclusively in the form of soluble mono- and divalent phosphate anions (Pi) in the soil solution. Due to a high fixation potential in the form of Fe and Al oxides/hydroxides and the formation of sparingly soluble Fe-, Al-P at soil pH levels < 6, or Ca-phosphates at pH 7–8, soluble and easily plant available soil phosphates usually comprise less than 0.1% of the total soil P [1]. Even in well-fertilized agricultural soils, the Pi concentrations in the rhizosphere soil solution hardly exceed 10 µM due to rapid fixation and root uptake [2]. Theoretical considerations on plant demands suggest that the respective equilibrium concentrations in the rhizosphere soil solution needs to be replaced 20–50 times per day to meet the plant P requirements. This is not possible due to the slow diffusion-mediated desorption of sparingly soluble soil P forms [3]. Accordingly, soil-grown plants are generally facing at least latent P limitation and are largely dependent on the expression of adaptive strategies to improve P acquisition. Stimulation of root growth and fine root structures, as well as mycorrhizal associations, support the spatial acquisition of soluble Pi. Root-induced changes in rhizosphere pH and the release of organic metal chelators can increase the solubility of immobilized soil P forms. Root-secretory phosphohydrolases can mediate the liberation of Pi sequestered in soil organic matter, which can comprise up to 80% of the total soil P [4]. These adaptations exhibit a large genotypic variation within plant species and cultivars. However, highly efficient P acquisition is not a widespread feature in most crops [4,5]. Accordingly, P use efficiency in agricultural production systems hardly exceeds 30% [6]. Moreover, high fixation of fertilizer P in soils and low P acquisition efficiency of plant roots are factors provoking P over-fertilization to maintain yield stability. This is associated with a high risk of irreversible P losses by surface run-off, eutrophication of surface waters, and wasting of P as a limited natural resource.
Soil microorganisms are important drivers of P turn over in soils, determining soil fertility and P availability for plants. Between 10-50 % of soil bacteria and 0.1–0.5 % of soil fungi are classified as P-solubilizing microorganisms (PSMs). They can mediate P mineralization, but also promote the solubilization of sparingly soluble inorganic P forms and even weathering of rocks and stones [6,7,8]. Similar to plant roots, PSMs are able to secrete phosphohydrolases, protons, organic metal chelators, and even mineral acids with proven potential to mineralize and solubilize the various P forms in soils [6]. Particularly in natural ecosystems, P acquisition of higher plants strongly depends on the activity of PSMs. Therefore, it is not surprising that recruitment of PSMs for symbiotic interactions is a widespread feature of plants in natural ecosystems and an important component of the adaptive plant strategies for P acquisition. Fungal PSMs are mainly found in ectomycorrhizal associations, while arbuscular mycorrhizae preferentially contribute to an improved spatial P acquisition of the host plants [4]. Similarly, many bacterial PSMs exhibit a high abundance in the rhizosphere of higher plants [6].
In face of the obvious importance of PSMs for P acquisition of higher plants, the concept to select highly efficient PSM strains as inoculants for improved P acquisition of crops has a long history dating back to the 1950s [9]. This is still promoted in numerous literature reviews [6,9,10,11]. However, although P-solubilizing properties of PSMs can be easily demonstrated on artificial growth media amended with sparingly soluble P sources, limited reproducibility of the expected effects under real rhizosphere conditions and particularly in field applications remains a major challenge [12]. More recent studies suggest that plant growth promotion and improved plant P acquisition cannot be regarded as a general PSM feature, and the expression of effects seems to be highly dependent on external factors. For example, the rhizosphere competence of microbial inoculants strongly depends on their survival in the soil environment, which can be influenced by interactions with the native soil microbiome and by abiotic stress factors [13,14]. However, the amount and type of fertilizer supply can also obviously play an important role: A recent meta-analysis by Schütz et al. [15], covering 171 publications, demonstrated plant growth-promoting effects of PSM inoculants mainly expressed in soils with moderate available P levels (25–35 kg P ha−1), while the efficiency declined at lower or higher ranges of P availability. This resembles the characteristics also of other beneficial plant-microbial interactions, such as symbiotic nitrogen fixation of Rhizobia with leguminous plants or plant interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Preferential performance of PSMs in combination with nitrogen-(N)-rich, manure-based fertilizers has been repeatedly reported by [16,17,18]. Nkebiwe et al. [19] found increased root colonisation by a PSM inoculant after ammonium depot fertilization in maize, associated with root proliferation and plant growth promotion, both in lab and field experiments.
Based on these observations, we hypothesized that the efficiency of plant-PSM interactions is influenced by the form of N fertilization. A range of pre-selected bacterial and fungal inoculants with documented P-solubilizing potential [20] was investigated in a series of pot and field experiments on soils with low P availability. Maize was selected as a host plant with a low inherent potential for mobilization of sparingly soluble soil P forms [4,21]. Rock-phosphate was provided as a sparingly soluble P source. Nitrogen supplied in different forms is frequently used in mineral fertilizers. The supplied N forms comprised nitrate, ammonium, urea, or ammonium fertilizer, stabilized with the nitrification inhibitor, DMPP (3,4-dimethylpyrazole-phosphate).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Pot Experiments on Artificial Sand Sub-soil Substrates

The first and second experiments were designed on 10 June 2014 and 28 February 2015 respectively using artificial mixtures of washed quartz sand and a calcareous Loess subsoil with a high P sorption capacity, dominated by sparingly soluble Ca-P with low levels of organic matter to minimize P supply via mineralization and to ensure that plant P acquisition mainly depended on mineral P solubilization.

2.1.1. Substrate Characteristics and Fertilization

Plant-available P: PCAL: 5 mg kg−1 [22]; pHCaCl2: 7.6; Corg: < 0.3%; Ntotal 0.02%; CaCO3: 23%.
The first experiment employed a mixture of 80% soil and 20% (w/w) quartz sand (0.6–1.2 mm Ø). The substrate was fertilized by homogenous incorporation of (mg kg−1 substrate): N (Ca(NO3)2) = 100; P 150 (Rock phosphate, 7.6% P, Timac-Agro, Troisdorf, Germany) or Ca(H2PO4)2) for the positive P control); K (K2SO4) = 150; Mg (MgSO4) = 50; Zn (ZnSO4) =2.6; Cu (CuSO4) = 1.0; and 20 μmol Fe kg−1 substrate (Sequestrene138, 6% Fe). Each pot was filled with 2.9 kg of substrate and moisture was adjusted daily to 18% (w/w) = 60% substrate water holding capacity (WHC).
For the second experiment, the addition of quartz sand was increased to 70% (w/w). The Rock-P fertilization was combined with two N forms at 100 mg N kg−1 substrate: (1) 100% NO3-N as Ca(NO3)2, and (2) 80% NH4-N as DMPP-(3,4-dimethylpyrazole-phosphate)-stabilized (NH4)2SO4 (Novatec solub, Compo Expert GmbH, Münster, Germany) with 20% NO3-N as Ca(NO3)2). A negative control without P fertilization and a positive control with soluble Ca(H2PO4)2 were included as additional treatments with nitrate fertilization. For the remaining nutrients, substrate fertilization was identical with experiment 1.

2.1.2. PSM Inoculation and Plant Culture

Experiment 1: Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134, Proradix®, Sourcon Padena GmbH, Tübingen, Germany (Pro: 1 × 109 CFU kg−1 substrate), Penicillium sp. PK 112, Biological Fertilizer OD, Bayer CropScience Biologics GmbH, Wismar, Germany (BFOD, 1 × 108 spores kg−1 substrate), Paenibacillus mucilaginosus, Abitep GmbH, Berlin, Germany (Paeni, 1 × 109 spores kg−1 substrate) and Vitalin SP11, Vitalin Pflanzengesundheit GmbH, Ober-Ramstadt, Germany (SP11, 20 mL of 0.2% suspension kg−1 substrate). Vitalin SP11 comprises Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas sp., Streptomyces spp., humic acids and extracts of the seaweed, Ascophyllum nodosum.
Experiment 2: Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134, Proradix® (Pro: 1 × 109 CFU kg−1 substrate).
The inoculants were suspended in 2.5 mM CaSO4. Maize seeds (Zea mays L. var Colisee) were soaked for 10 min with the microbial suspensions, sown at 3 cm depth and thereafter 20 mL PSM suspension was inoculated into the seeding hole with two additional weekly applications close to the stem of the plants. Plants were arranged in a completely randomized design with 4 replicates per treatment for 41 days (experiment 1) and with 5 replicates for 36 days (experiment 2) under greenhouse conditions (air temperature range: 11–30 °C, average 21 °C) with additional light 12 h d−1, average light intensity: 275 µM m−1 s−1.

2.2. Pot Experiment on Field Soil

The experiment was established on 15 August 2015 on an organic farming field soil with moderately low P availability, freshly collected from the A horizon at the experimental station, Klein-Hohenheim, Hohenheim University, Stuttgart, Germany), to include a native top-soil microflora.

2.2.1. Substrate Characteristics and Fertilization

Soil characteristics: Clay-loam, pHCaCl2 = 7.0; PCAL = 36.7 mg P Kg−1; Ntotal: 0.15%; Corg: 1.28%; substrate mixed with 30% (w/w) quartz sand for improvement of soil structure.
The basal fertilization comprised (mg kg−1 substrate): N 100 as DMPP-stabilized (NH4)2SO4 or Ca(NO3)2, P 100 (Rock-P or Ca(H2PO4)2 for the positive control); K 150 (as K2SO4) and Mg 50 (as MgSO4). No micronutrient fertilisation was performed in this experiment. Each pot was filled with 3 kg of substrate and moisture was adjusted daily to 21% (w/w) = 60% substrate water holding capacity (WHC).

2.2.2. PSM Inoculation and Plant Culture

Seven PSM inoculants were tested in comparison with a non-inoculated control, with Rock-P as a sparingly soluble P source in combination with an N supply as DMPP-stabilized NH4+: Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134 (Proradix); Trichoderma harzianum T22 (Trianum-P, Koppert, Biological Systems, Berkelen Rodenrijs, The Netherlands); Penicillium sp. PK 112 (BFOD), Paenibacillus mucilaginosus (Paeni), Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 Rhizovital42® (Abitep GmbH, Berlin, Germany); Vitalin SP11, and CombiFectorA: Trichoderma harzianum OMG16 + Vitabac with five Bacillus strains (Bactiva GmbH, Straelen, Germany) + Zn/Mn, Institute of Bioanalytical Sciences, Bernburg, Germany). Furthermore, the best performing PSM strain, Proradix [20], was tested also with Rock-P and nitrate-based fertilization, as a reproduction of experiment 2, described under Section 2.1. Two additional non-inoculated treatments included an unfertilized control and a positive control, supplied with soluble triple-superphosphate (TSP, 100 mg P kg−1 substrate) and Ca(NO3)2 fertilization (100 mg N kg−1 substrate). Inoculation was performed as described under Section 2.1.2. Plants were arranged in a completely randomized design with five replicates per treatment for 35 days under greenhouse conditions (air temperature range: 13–32°C, average 20 °C) with additional light 12 h d−1; average light intensity: 275 µM m−1 s−1.

2.3. Field Experiment

The field trial was conducted in 2016 at the “Experimental Station of the Department of Agriculture of Napoli Federico II”, located at Castel Volturno, in an agricultural area 60 km north of Naples, (CE) Campania, Italy; annual mean temperature: 15.6 °C; average annual precipitation: 879 mm.

2.3.1. Soil Characteristics and Fertilization

The soil was classified as clay loam (Vertic Xerofluvent), pHH2O 8.6; available NaHCO3-extractable POlsen 11 mg kg−1 Ntotal: 0.13%, Corg 1.5%. Nitrogen and phosphate fertilization was performed (1) according to the local farmers’ practice (urea = 180 kg N ha−1 and non-stabilized di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) = 50 kg P ha−1); (2) as a negative control with DMPP-stabilized ammonium sulfate (NovaTec 21 solub = 150 Kg N ha−1) without additional P fertilization; (3) as a positive control with DMPP-stabilized ammonium sulfate (150 Kg N ha−1) and triple superphosphate (TSP= 50 kg P ha−1) and (4) combinations of DMPP-stabilized ammonium sulfate (150 Kg N ha−1) with selected PSM-inoculants, but without additional P fertilization.

2.3.2. PSM Inoculation and Plant Culture

PSM products comprised: (1) Combifector A (a combination product of Trichoderma harzianum OMG16 + Vitabac = 5 Bacillus strains and micronutrients Zn/Mn, Institute of Bioanalytical Sciences, Bernburg, Germany; (2) Combifector B (a combination product of Trichoderma harzianum OMG16, + Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (RhizoVital FZB42) and micronutrients Mn/Zn, Institute of Bioanalytical Sciences, Bernburg, Germany, ABiTEP GmbH, Berlin, Germany; (3) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Rhizovital FZB42® ABiTEP GmbH, Berlin, Germany + humic acids from composted cow manure produced on a farm in Castel Volturno; and (4) a seaweed extract—Bacillus amiloquefaciens seed dressing formulation provided by Group Limagrain, Saint-Beauzire, France). Combifector A and B (1+2), were applied at sowing by broadcast top-soil incorporation at a dosage of 100 g ha−1, equivalent to 1 × 1012 fungal spores plus 1 × 1012 bacterial spores ha−1. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Rhizovital FZB42 with humic acids at a dosage of 5 kg ha−1 (3) was inoculated into the seeding row via band application, and the B. amyloliquefaciens—seaweed extract formulation (4) was provided in the form of pre-coated maize seeds.
The experimental area was divided into 40 m2 plots under a randomized block design with four replicates. Maize seeds (Zea mays L. cv 30.600, Group Limagrain, Saint-Beauzire, France) were sown at the beginning of June with a distance of about 10 cm and 75 cm inter-row distance, with a plant density of 7 plants m−2. Each treatment was replicated four times. Plant establishment was monitored at the V6 stage at 42 DAS by shoot biomass determination. Final grain harvest was performed in early November.

2.4. Plant Biomass and Root Length Determination

At final harvest, the dry biomass of the shoots was determined after 3 d of being oven-dried at 65 °C. The roots in each pot were washed out from the soil substrate and were stored in 30% (v/v) ethanol. The roots were later separated, submerged in a water film in transparent Perspex trays, and digitalized using a flat-bed scanner (Epson Expression 1000 XL, Tokyo, Japan). Subsequently, the root length of the digitalized samples was measured using the WinRHIZO root analysis system (Reagent Instruments, Quebec, QC, Canada). Thereafter, the root samples were oven-dried for 2 days at 65 °C for the determination of dry matter.

2.5. Shoot Mineral Analysis

For both experiments, plant mineral nutrient analysis was performed as follows: Tomato shoot N was measured with a Vario Max CN macro-elementar analyser (Elementar Analysensysteme, Hanau, Germany). For P, K, Ca, and Mg, a microwave digestion method was employed for the wet ashing of finely ground dry plant materials (250 mg) in 1 mL of deionized water, 2.5 mL concentrated HNO3 (1:3), and 2 mL H2O2 (30%). Digestion was performed in a microwave digestion system (Ethos, MLS, Leutkirch, Germany) for 1 h and allowed to cool for 30 min. Approximately 5 g of activated charcoal was added for sample decolouration, mixed well by shaking, and allowed to settle during 15 min. The samples were filtered with ashless MG 640d Blue ribbon filter paper (Macherey & Nagel, Düren, Germany). Phosphate was estimated spectrophotometrically (Hitachi LtD., Tokyo, Japan) according to [23]. Magnesium, calcium, zinc, and manganese were measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (iCE 3000 series, Thermo Fischer, Dreieich, Germany) and potassium by flame emission spectrophotometry (Eppendorf-ELEX6361, Netheler+Hinz, Hamburg, Germany).

3. Results

3.1. Experiments on Artificial Growth Substrates (Sub-Soil-Sand Mixtures)

To study PSM-induced mobilization of sparingly-soluble soil P, maize (cv Colisee) was used as a test crop with low adaptive potential for root-induced P solubilisation [4]. Plants were inoculated with different PSMs of fungal and bacterial origin, comprising three single-strain inoculants (Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134 Proradix®(Pro), Paenibacillus mucilaginosus (Paeni), Penicillium sp. PK 112, Biological Fertilizer OD (BFOD) and one consortium product, Vitalin SP11, with a combination of Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas sp., Streptomyces spp., humic acids, and extract of the seaweed, Ascophyllum nodosum. Pilot experiments revealed that the selected microbial PSMs were able to solubilize insoluble tri-calciumphosphates (Ca-P), rock phosphate (RP), and sewage sludge ash (SA), added to artificial growth media, and Proradix was identified as the most efficient PSM strain [20]. The plants were cultivated on a calcareous Loess subsoil substrate (80% soil/20% sand, pH 7.6) with low P availability (5 mg PCAL kg−1), low organic matter content < 0.3%), and sparingly soluble rock P as the exclusive P source. This experimental setup ensured that plant P acquisition was only possible after Ca-P solubilisation. However, despite the proven P-solubilizing potential, all microbial inoculants failed to stimulate P acquisition of the test plants and even exerted inhibitory effects on plant growth in comparison with a non-inoculated control (Figure 1A,C,D). Accordingly, P shoot accumulation was not increased in the PSM-treated variants. By contrast, shoot biomass production increased by 300% and shoot P accumulation by 500% in maize plants supplied with soluble Ca(H2PO4)2 as a positive control (Figure 1A,B).
Based on these results, it was hypothesized that a high pH-buffering capacity of the calcareous soil substrate with 23% CaCO3 counteracts PSM-induced acidification of the growth medium and thereby microbial Rock-P solubilisation. To test this hypothesis, the pH buffering capacity of the growth substrate was reduced by increasing the sand content from 20 to 70% (w/w). Moreover, as an additional fertilisation treatment to the N supply via calcium nitrate, a variant with ammonium-dominated N application (80% (NH4)2SO4, stabilized with the nitrification inhibitor DMPP + 20 % Ca(NO3)2) was included in order to promote Rock-P solubilisation by ammonium-induced rhizosphere acidification [4]. Proradix, pre-characterized as PSM with the highest P-solubilizing potential [20], was used as an inoculant.
In the variants with nitrate fertilization and Rock-P supply, PSM inoculation had no significant effect on shoot biomass production (Figure 2A) and P accumulation (Figure 2B) of the maize plants. Biomass production reached only 35%, and P accumulation 24%, as compared with the positive TSP control supplied with soluble P. Replacement of nitrate by stabilised ammonium significantly increased shoot P accumulation (Figure 2B), but a significant increase in shoot biomass production by 92% was exclusively achieved by the combination of ammonium supply with PSM inoculation (Figure 2A). However, P shoot concentration and P accumulation of the ammonium variants with and without PSM inoculation were not significantly different. With the exception of the positive control supplied with soluble TSP, the P nutritional, status of the remaining variants was critical (< 0.3%, Campbell 2009) (Figure 2B).

3.2. Pot Experiment on Field Soil

Since stabilized ammonium fertilization exerted beneficial effects on the plant growth-promoting potential of the PSM strain, Proradix, on a sand-soil substrate supplied with sparingly soluble Rock-P as major P source (Figure 2), an additional experiment was conducted under more realistic conditions, using a clay-loam organic farming field soil (pH 7.0) with moderately low P availability (PCAL 37 mg kg−1). Phosphate was supplied as Rock-P or in the form of soluble triple-superphosphate (TSP) as a positive control. To evaluate synergistic effects of PSM inoculants with stabilized ammonium fertilization, two fungal (Trianum-P = Trichoderma harzianum T22, BFOD = Penicillium sp.) and three bacterial single-strain inoculants (Proradix = Pseudomonas sp. DMSZ 13134; Rhizovital = Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42; and Paenibacillus mucilaginosus), as well as two consortium products (SP11 and Combifector-A), pre-characterized as PSMs [20], were selected for inoculation of maize plants (cv Colisee). Proradix, characterized as the strain with the highest P-solubilizing potential [20], was investigated also in combination with nitrate fertilization.

3.2.1. Shoot Growth and Root Development

Analysis of shoot biomass production revealed P as the limiting nutrient, indicated by a 205% increase after soluble TSP application as compared with the unfertilized control. Stabilized ammonium with Rock-P had a fertilizer effect of 111%. Biomass production in the PSM-ammonium combinations was significantly increased in all variants compared with the non-inoculated control, with the exception of the two fungal strains, Trianum P and BFOD. Similarly, the combination of Proradix with nitrate fertilization revealed no plant growth-promoting effects. (Figure 3). Stimulation of shoot growth by PSM inoculation was associated with a clear trend for increased root length development, although the effect was significant only for the single strain inoculant, Rhizovital FZB42 (+ 32%), and the consortium product, Combifector-A (+ 50%. Figure 3B), after pairwise comparison with the non-inoculated control.
Similar beneficial growth effects of ammonium fertilization on selected PSM strains have been recorded in additional experiments on different soils with a pH range between 5.7 and 7.9 and maize, spring wheat, and tomato as target crops (summarized in Table S1).

3.2.2. Mineral Nutrient Status

Concerning the plant nutrient status (Table 1), significant PSM effects were recorded for nitrogen (N), phosphate (P), potassium (K), and manganese (Mn). Magnesium and zinc concentrations were in the sufficiency range for all treatments).
The P nutritional status of the maize plants was critical (< 0.3%, [24]) in all investigated variants, even with soluble TSP fertilization. The combination of stabilized ammonium with Rock-P increased the P shoot concentration by 27% as compared with the unfertilized control, without a further increase by additional PSM inoculation. However, P shoot accumulation was significantly increased in the ammonium combinations with Trianum P and Proradix after pairwise comparison with the non-inoculated control (t-test, p = 0.05).
The N status was critical in the ammonium-Rock-P variant (26 mg g DM−1), but the N concentration reached the sufficiency range [24] for all tested PSM inoculants. Nitrogen shoot accumulation increased significantly in the Proradix-, Rhizovital-, SP11, and Combifector-A-ammonium combinations. The K status was sufficient in all treatments and shoot K accumulation was further increased by all PSM treatments except BFOD by pairwise comparison with the non-inoculated control. The manganese status of the plants supplied with Rock-P and stabilized ammonium was critical [24], but was significantly increased by 50% to the sufficiency range by PSM-inoculation.

3.3. Field Experiment

To evaluate the beneficial effects of stabilized ammonium fertilization on plant-PSM interactions in maize under practice conditions, a field experiment was established at the experimental Station Castel Volturno, in an agricultural area 60 km north of Naples, (CE) Campania, Italy, on an alkaline clay loam soil (Vertic Xerofluvent) of pH 8.6 with moderate P availability (11 mg kg−1 soil) according to POlsen extraction [25].
The investigated BEs comprised combination products of bacterial and fungal strains pre-tested in the pot experiments (Rhizovital = Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42, Combifector A = Trichoderma harzianum OMG16 + Vitabac (5 Bacillus strains), Combifector B = Trichoderma harzianum OMG16 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42). The microbial strains were combined with Zn/Mn (Combifector A/B), humic acids (FZB42 + HA), or seaweed extract (B. amyloliquefaciens + SW) and applied by soil incorporation (CombiA/B, FZB42+HA) and via seed dressing (B. amyloliquefaciens + SW). The treatments comprised variants without P fertilization supplied with DMPP-stabilized ammonium sulfate with or without application of microbial inoculants. A triple superphosphate combination with stabilized ammonium was included as a positive control with soluble P supply and a farmer´s practice variant with urea and non-stabilised di-ammonium phosphate fertilization was included as an additional control. An intermediate harvest during early growth of the maize plants was performed at the V6 stage (42 DAS) and final grain yield was recorded at V12.
During early growth, plant biomass production of the control without P fertilization supplied with stabilized ammonium was significantly increased by 24% after supplementation with soluble P (TSP). Replacing TSP application by PSM inoculation resulted in even stronger responses in shoot biomass production, with the largest effect induced by Combifector-B (+ 40%). Early plant growth promotion translated into a significant increase in grain yield by 0.8 t ha−1 (+ 5.2%) in the TSP variant, while significant yield effects in the PSM treatments were recorded for CombifectorA/B and the FZB42+HA variants, with the largest effect (1.0 t ha−1, + 6.5%) in the Combifector-B-ammonium combination. The farmer´s practice of fertilization with non-stabilized urea and di-ammonium phosphate had no significant effects in terms of biomass production during plant establishment and the smallest effect on final grain yield (+ 3.2%), as compared with the control supplied with stabilized ammonium without P fertilization. The P status was sufficient, and the N status was low to critical without significant treatment differences [24]. Shoot P accumulation was significantly increased by Combi-B and FZB42+HA application and also N accumulation increased particularly in response to the PSM treatments, while this effect was less expressed in the farmer´s practice and TSP variants (Table 2).

4. Discussion

Understanding the contribution of PSM inoculants to plant growth promotion and the best conditions for their efficient performance at a mechanistic level is a challenge. Many studies have characterized the solubilization potential of PGPMs from sparingly soluble tri-Ca-phosphate on artificial media, followed by pot and/or field experiments with inoculated host plants on P limited soils, and successful examples of plant growth promotion are frequently interpreted as a consequence of microbial P solubilization [6]. There is no doubt that soil microbial activities play an important role in P mineralization and for solubilization of sparingly soluble mineral forms of soil P. However, PSM-host plant interactions involved in plant growth promotion are obviously more complex.

4.1. PGPM Effects on Artificial Sand/sub-soil Substrates

Testing a range of four PSM inoculants, based on six bacterial and fungal strains with proven potential for solubilization of sparingly soluble tri-calcium phosphate [20,26,27], was performed in a culture system, based on a calcareous Loess subsoil (pH 7.6) with sparingly-soluble Ca-phosphate (Rock-P) as the sole P source. Maize was used as a crop with a low inherent potential for root-induced P solubilisation [4]. Under these conditions, plant P uptake was almost exclusively dependent on Ca-P mobilization. However, all tested inoculants with P-solubilizing potential completely failed in terms of plant growth promotion and PSM-assisted P acquisition, associated with a severely P-deficient nutritional status of the host plants (1.1 mg g−1 shoot DM). Normal plant development required supplementation with soluble triple-superphosphate (TSP; Figure 1). Similar results have been recently reported for experiments conducted in seven countries on soils with low-P availability and/or supply of sparingly soluble P sources, such as Rock-P, slags, and ashes in four different crops (maize, barley, wheat, tomato) with 13 PSM strains [4,17,18,28]. Based on these findings, it was hypothesized that on neutral to alkaline soils, a high pH buffering capacity might be a major factor, limiting the efficiency PSM-induced P solubilisation in the rhizosphere via the release of protons, organic, and mineral acids [6]. Similar limitations have been previously reported also for mobilization of P or Fe via root-induced rhizosphere acidification [4,29].
To test this hypothesis, the experiment was repeated with the same calcareous sub-soil, mixed with 70% (w/w) quartz sand to reduce the pH-buffering capacity of the substrate. As an additional variant, nitrate-based N fertilization was partially replaced by stabilized ammonium to promote rhizosphere acidification via proton release from plant roots and microorganisms for charge-balance of ammonium uptake [4]. Under the conditions of lower substrate buffering, already Rock-P supply tended to increase plant biomass production, but a significant effect compared with the unfertilized control (+ 207%) was recorded exclusively in combination with the Pseudomonas strain, DMSZ 13134 (Proradix), pre-elected as the most efficient PSM strain in pilot experiments [20]. As expected, ammonium fertilization further stimulated shoot biomass production, but again a significant effect compared with the nitrate variant (+ 130%) was recorded only in combination with Proradix (Figure 2A). Interestingly, in contrast to the effects on plant growth promotion, shoot P accumulation was significantly increased by Rock-P fertilization in the nitrate variant (+ 110%) and by ammonium versus nitrate fertilization (+ 71%), without additional effects induced by PSM inoculation. This finding suggests that PSM-induced plant growth promotion was not simply a consequence of PSM-mediated P solubilisation. Taken together, the results indicated that the pH-buffering capacity of the substrate can indeed represent a limiting factor for PSM-assisted fertilization strategies to improve plant acquisition of acid-soluble Ca-P fractions in soils. The combination with stabilized ammonium fertilizers supporting rhizosphere acidification may act as a suitable strategy to promote PSM performance. However, the effects are not necessarily related with direct promotion of the P-solubilizing potential of the PSM inoculants.

4.2. PGPM Effects on Field Soil

Plant growth-promoting effects of microbial inoculants can be demonstrated most easily on artificial growth substrates lacking a native soil microflora with potentially competing properties in terms of root colonization. This was of course also the case in the first experiment demonstrating positive PSM effects conducted on an artificial sand-subsoil mixture. Therefore, the experiment was repeated, using a real field soil pH 7.0 with moderately low P availability (PCAL 37 mg kg−1) and Rock-P fertilization. Again, stabilized ammonium fertilization combined with Rock-P increased the shoot biomass compared with the unfertilized control. Shoot biomass production was further increased by combination of Proradix with stabilized ammonium, which was not the case for the combination of Proradix with nitrate fertilization (Figure 3). In this experiment, additionally, a wider range of pre-selected PSMs [20] was tested under the same conditions. The selection comprised five single-strain inoculants with two fungal (Trianum-P = Trichoderma harzianum T22, BFOD = Penicillium sp) and three bacterial strains (Proradix = Pseudomonas sp. DMSZ 13134; Rhizovital = Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42; Paenibacillus mucilaginosus), as well as two consortium products (SP11 used in experiment 1 and Combifector-A (= Trichoderma harzianum OMG16 + Vitabac (five Bacillus strains) + Zn/Mn).
With the exception of the two fungal strains, all PSMs significantly increased shoot biomass production in combination with stabilized ammonium fertilization and reached about 88% of the biomass of the plants supplied with soluble TSP (Figure 3). This was associated with a clear trend for increased root length development with significant effects for FZB42 (+ 31%) and Combifector-A (+ 50%). By contrast, the two fungal inoculants and the nitrate-Proradix combination, ineffective in shoot growth promotion, also had no or only marginal effects on root growth. Similar to the experiment with the artificial sand-sub-soil substrate (70/30), ammonium fertilization in combination with Rock-P significantly increased the P tissue concentrations compared with the unfertilized control, but no further increase was recorded after PSM inoculation (Table 1). Shoot accumulation of P was significantly increased after inoculation with the bacterial PSM, Proradix, and the fungal PSM, Trianum-P, but the fungal strain had no effect on root growth or shoot biomass production (Figure 3, Table 2). By contrast, Combifector-A with the largest impact on root length development (+ 50%) had no significant effect on shoot P accumulation (Figure 3B, Table 2). The results indicated once more that the plant growth-promoting effects of the investigated inoculants in combination with stabilized ammonium fertilization were obviously not related to direct PSM-assisted P solubilisation in the rhizosphere. However, a closer look to the mineral nutritional status of the plants revealed that P was not the only limiting nutrient, and critical levels of N (< 30 mg g−1 DM) and Mn concentrations (0.02 mg g−1 DM) were recorded in the control treatment supplied with stabilized ammonium and Rock-P fertilization (Table 1). The microbial inoculants increased both the N and Mn nutritional status to the sufficiency range (Table 1) and a significant increase of N and Mn shoot accumulation was observed for the Proradix, Rhizovital, SP11, and Combifector-A-ammonium combinations by pairwise comparison with the non-inoculated control (Table 2), associated with increased shoot biomass production (Figure 3A).
Taken together, the results suggest a scenario of synergistic interactions between fertilizer supply and plant growth-promoting properties of the selected PSM inoculants: On neutral to alkaline soils with low P availability, crops with a low inherent potential for P solubilisation are frequently facing problems of P limitation. The inoculation with PGPMs to improve plant P acquisition is not successful in this case, since the weak P-deficient plants are not able to support efficient root colonization by the PSM inoculants and the establishment of a functional plant-microbial interaction. The fertilization with stabilized ammonium fertilizers could partially overcome this limitation by improving the P nutritional status, probably mediated by the well-documented root-induced rhizosphere acidification [4], contributing to solubilisation of Ca-phosphates. The more vital status of these plants promoted root colonisation by the microbial inoculants, which were, in turn, able to express their plant growth promoting potential. This is in line with previous reports on beneficial effects of P starter supply on the establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizal associations and the Rhizobium symbiosis in leguminous plants [30,31]. It also confirms the findings of the recent meta-analysis by Schütz et al. [15], which demonstrated that plant growth promoting effects of PSMs can be expected on soils with moderately low P availability (25–35 kg P ha−1), but not on low-P soils or under sufficient P supply. Under these conditions, plant growth promotion is not necessarily caused by PSM-mediated P solubilisation. Stimulation of root growth induced by the inoculants can contribute to the acquisition of other potential growth-limiting nutrients and may also promote ammonium-induced P solubilization by the development of a larger acidifying root system.

4.3. PGPM Effects under Field Conditions

This scenario was evaluated additionally under field conditions on an alkaline clay loam soil (Vertic Xerofluvent) pH 8.6 with a P availability (POlsen: 11 mg kg−1 soil) considered as moderate for maize cultivation [25,32]. In face of the high soil pH and moderate P availability [25], no Rock-P fertilization was included into this experiment and the performance of microbial inoculants in combination with stabilized ammonium was compared without P fertilization versus TSP fertilization and fertilization according to the farmer’s practice, which comprised di-ammonium phosphate and urea without nitrification inhibitors. Due to the promising plant growth-promoting effects of PGPM combinations in the previous experiment (Figure 3A), a range of consortium products were tested as microbial inoculants: Combifector-A (see Section 4.2) Combifector-B (Trichoderma harzianum OMG16 + Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 + Zn/Mn), Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 + humic acids, and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 + seaweed extract. Since many studies have demonstrated the importance of early root development as a critical trait determining yield formation of maize particularly with respect to P acquisition [33,34,35], special emphasis was placed on the selection of PSMs with additional root growth-promoting potential (Figure 3B).
Stabilized ammonium fertilization combined with TSP significantly improved field establishment of maize indicated by a 24% increase in shoot biomass production at 42 DAS, as compared with the unfertilized control (Table 2). This finding demonstrates that P availability was a growth-limiting factor. The importance of ammonium in this context is highlighted by the absence of growth-promoting effects in the farmer’s practice fertilization using DAP and urea without nitrification inhibitors (Table 2), leading to rapid conversion of NH4-N to nitrate in this treatment. However, even without additional P fertilization, the application of the PSM inoculants in combination with stabilized ammonium fully compensated the P fertilization effect of TSP and reached up to 40% increased biomass production in the Combifector-B variant, which was even larger than any plant growth-promoting effect recorded in the pot experiments under controlled conditions (Table 2, Figure 3A). The effect of Combifector-A (+ 27%) on shoot biomass production was almost identical with the result of the pot experiment (+ 28%). At the time of the intermediate harvest, no treatment differences were recorded for shoot P and N concentrations, but the N status was low [24]. The shoot P content and particularly shoot N accumulation significantly increased in response to TSP and PSM applications. This effect coincided with increased shoot biomass production (Table 2), indicating that any surplus in nutrient uptake was immediately transformed into plant growth. Similarly, shoot accumulation of micronutrients (Zn, Mn, Cu) significantly increased, particularly in the PSM treatments (Figure S1), without significant effects on the tissue concentrations, which reached the sufficiency range in all treatments [24]. The general stimulatory PSM effect on shoot accumulation of various macro- and micro-nutrients suggests root growth stimulation rather than P solubilization as a mode of action for the selected inoculants.
The improved field establishment during early growth finally translated into a significant increase in grain yield of 5.2% with TSP fertilization and of 6.5% in the FZB42 + humic acids variant, while the farmer´s practice of fertilization had the smallest yield effect (+ 3.2%) compared with the stabilized NH4+ variant without P supply (Table 2). Large effects on early field establishment may be attributed to the limited expression of adaptive responses towards improved P acquisition during the early growth of maize [4,21,33]. Localized P starter application is one of the measures to mitigate this problem [36]. Increased P availability due to ammonium-induced rhizosphere acidification in response to stabilized ammonium fertilization may induce a similar effect, followed by improved P acquisition in combination with the PSM strains with a high root growth-promoting potential, such as Combifector-A or FZB42 (Figure 3B). However, nitrification inhibitors, such as DMPP, are usually active in soils only for limited time periods of several weeks due to microbial degradation [37], and also PGPM inoculants frequently exhibit only transient effects. Therefore, no direct long-lasting effects on P solubilisation can be expected. Moreover, the initial limitations in P acquisition may be at least partially compensated, e.g., by more intensive rooting or the establishment of mycorrhizal associations in later stages of plant development [32] and the moderate P availability at the investigated field site. This could explain the limited translation of early growth effects into yield increases of only 5–6%.

5. Conclusions

The present study demonstrates that the expression of the plant growth-promoting and P-solubilizing potential of a wide range of bacterial and fungal PSM inoculants can be selectively influenced by the form of the N supply to the host plant with promising perspectives for synergistic effects with stabilized ammonium fertilization. The results clearly demonstrate that the beneficial effects are not necessarily related with a direct improvement of the P solubilizing potential of the PSM strains. It remains to be established to which extent root-induced rhizosphere acidification in response to ammonium uptake contributes to the expression of the effects. Increased auxin production potential of the inoculants with ammonium as the preferential N source [38] or a stimulatory effect on ammonium-induced proton extrusion of plant roots recently reported for selected Bacillus strains [39] as well as stimulation of rhizosphere acid phosphatase activities in response to a lower rhizosphere pH could provide additional explanations. It can also be expected that not only plant-PSM associations, but also inoculants expressing only root growth-promoting activity would profit from the combination with stabilized ammonium fertilizers. In these cases, the formation of a larger acidifying root system may contribute to the solubilisation of acid-soluble P sources (e.g., Ca-P, Rock-P, ashes, slags, etc.) as well as micronutrients (Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu) at least on soils with neutral to alkaline pH. This would not only support plant species with low inherent potential for root-induced nutrient mobilization, but also the expression of adaptive mechanisms for the solubilisation of sparingly soluble soil nutrients.
The finding that a wide range of different bacterial and fungal inoculants had beneficial effects on plant growth and/or nutrient mobilization in combination with stabilized ammonium fertilization raises the question whether native populations of PGPMs could also be influenced in a similar way. These interactions might at least partially contribute to the positive effects on nutrient acquisition and plant growth promotion observed in the non-inoculated controls supplied with stabilized ammonium fertilization. Apart from rhizosphere acidification, ammonium-dominated fertilization also significantly modifies the composition of root exudates compared with the nitrate supply [40,41] due to intense transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolic alterations related with the assimilation of ammonium [42,43]. Accordingly, distinct rhizosphere microbiome effects can be expected. However, surprisingly, numerous studies have addressed the impact of N fertilization intensity on soil microbial communities [44,45,46], while N form effects have rarely been investigated so far [47]. These aspects need to be considered for future investigations together with the impact of different soil properties, climatic conditions, and genotypic differences in crop responsiveness to evaluate the potential of stabilized ammonium fertilizers as tools to manipulate plant interactions with plant growth-promoting microorganisms.

6. Patents

Some result in this article has been submitted for a joint patent application in 2017 by University of Hohenheim and Eurochem Agro GmbH to the European Patent Office (application number EC70522EP SF/IRK on “Method and Composition for Improving Nutrient Acquisition of Plants”.

Supplementary Materials

The following figure is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/7/2/38/s1, Figure S1: Micronutrient shoot accumulation during early growth (42 DAS) of Maize (cv Limagrain 30.600) on an alkaline clay loam soil (Vertic Xerofluvent, pH 8.6) with and without (NoP) P fertilization in the form of triple superphosphate (TSP) or di-ammonium phosphate (DAP). Nitrogen was supplied as DMPP-stabilized ammonium sulfate or non-stabilized Urea-DAP. In the PSM variants, phosphate fertilization was replaced by selected PSM products: Combifector-A (CombiA), Combifector-B (CombiB), Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 + humic acids (FZBHA), B. amylolique-faciens + seaweed extract (BaSE). Means of four replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences; One way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Table S1: Effects of nitrate (NO3) versus stabilized ammonium (Stab. NH4) fertilization on shoot growth and yield formation of different crops with and without inoculation with microbial biostimulants (BS).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.N., I.K.M., P.M.N., V.C., A.P.; Investigation, I.K.M., M.K., V.C.; Resources, J.G., N.B.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, I.K.M.; Writing-Review & Editing, G.N., A.P., J.G., N.B., P.M.N., U.L.; Project Administration, G.N., U.L., A.P., J.G.; Funding acquisition, U.L., G.N., A.P., J.G.

Funding

This work was funded by the European Community’s FP7 Program/2007–2013 under grant agreement number 312117 (BIOFECTOR).

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank ABITEP GmbH, Berlin, Germany; Bayer CropScience Biologics GmbH, Wismar, Germany; Koppert, Biological Systems, Berkelen Rodenrijs, The Netherlands; Sourcon Padena GmbH, Tübingen, Germany; Vitalin Pflanzengesundheit GmbH, Ober-Ramstadt, Germany for providing PSM strains.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Zhou, K.; Binkley, D.; Doxtader, K.G. A new method for estimating gross phosphorus mineralization and immobilization rates in soils. Plant Soil 1992, 147, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schachtman, D.P.; Reid, R.J.; Ayling, S.M. Phosphorus uptake by plants: From soil to cell. Plant Physiol. 1998, 116, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Marschner, H. Rhizosphere pH effects on phosphorus nutrition. In Genetic Manipulation of Crop Plants to Enhance Integrated Nutrient Management in Cropping Systems. 1. Phosphorus; Johansen, C., Lee, K.K., Sharma, K.K., Subbaro, G.V., Kueneman, E.A., Eds.; Proceedings of an FAO/ICRISAT Expert Consultary Workshop, ICRISAT Asia Center, India; International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics: Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India, 1995; pp. 107–115. [Google Scholar]
  4. Neumann, G.; Römheld, V. Root-induced changes in the availability of nutrients in the rhizosphere. In Plant Roots the Hidden Half, 3rd ed.; Waisel, Y., Eshel, A., Kafkafi, U., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 617–649. [Google Scholar]
  5. Neumann, G.; Römheld, V. The release of root exudates as affected by the plant physiological status. In The Rhizosphere: Biochemistry and Organic Substances at the Soil-Plant Interface, 2nd ed.; Pinton, R., Varanini, Z., Nannipieri, Z., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007; pp. 23–72. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sharma, B.S.; Riyaz, Z.; Sayed, M.H.T.; Thivakaran, A.G. Phosphate solubilizing microbes: Sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. SpringerPlus 2013, 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jongmans, A.G.; van Breemen, N.; Lundström, U.; van Hees, P.A.W.; Finlay, R.D.; Srinivasan, M.; Unestam, T.; Giesler, R.; Melkerud, P.; Olsson, M. Rock-eating fungi. Nature 1997, 389, 682–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Uroz, S.; Calvaruso, C.; Turpault, M.P.; Frey-Klett, P. Mineral weathering by bacteria: Ecology, actors and mechanisms. Trends Microbiol. 2009, 17, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Khan, A.A.; Jilani, G.; Akhtar, M.S.; Naqvi, S.M.S.; Rasheed, M. Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria: Occurrence, mechanisms and their role in crop production. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2009, 1, 48–58. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rodríguez, H.; Fraga, R. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol. Adv. 1999, 17, 319–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alori, E.T.; Glick, B.R.; Babalola, O.O. Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Menzies, N.; Harbison, D.; Dart, P. Soil chemistry-facts and fiction and their influence on the fertilizer decision making process. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Grassland Society of NSW, Bathurst, Australia, 26–28 July 2011; pp. 49–63. [Google Scholar]
  13. van Veen, J.A.; van Overbeek, L.S.; van Elsas, J.D. Fate and activity of microorganisms introduced into soil. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1997, 611, 21–35. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lugtenberg, B.; Kamilova, F. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 541–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schütz, L.; Gattinger, A.; Meier, M.; Muller, A.; Boller, T.; Mäder, P.; Mathimaran, N. Improving crop yield and nutrient use efficiency via biofertilization—A global meta-analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Abbasi, M.K.; Musa, N.; Manzoor, M. Mineralization of soluble P fertilizers and insoluble rock phosphate in response to phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and poultry manure and their effect on the growth and P utilization efficiency of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Biogeosciences 2015, 12, 4607–4619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thonar, C.; Lekfeldt, J.D.S.; Cozzolino, V.; Kundel, D.; Kulhánek, M.; Mosimann, C.; Neumann, G.; Piccolo, A.; Rex, M.; Symanczik, S.; et al. Potential of three microbial bio-effectors to promote maize growth and nutrient acquisition from alternative phosphorous fertilizers in contrasting soils. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2017, 4, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mpanga, I.K.; Dapaah, H.K.; Geistlinger, J.; Ludewig, U.; Neumann, G. Soil type-dependent interactions of P-solubilizing microorganisms with organic and inorganic fertilizers mediate plant growth promotion in tomato. Agronomy 2018, 8, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nkebiwe, P.M.; Weinmann, M.; Müller, T. Improving fertilizer-depot exploitation and maize growth by inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria: From lab to field. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2016, 3, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nkebiwe, P.M.; Neumann, G.; Müller, T. Densely rooted rhizosphere hotspots induced around subsurface NH4+-fertilizer depots: A home for soil PGPMs? Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2017, 4, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, H.; White, P.J.; Li, C. Biomass partitioning and rhizosphere responses of maize and faba bean to phosphorus deficiency. Crop Pasture Sci. 2016, 67, 847–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. VDLUFA (Verband Deutscher Landwirtschaftlicher Untersuchungs-und Forschungsanstalten e.V. Speyer, Germany). Handbuch der Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs- und Untersuchungsmethodik Methodenbuch Band I Die Untersuchung von Böden, 4th ed.; VDLUFA Verlag: Darmsatdt, Germany, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gericke, S.; Kurmis, B. Die kolorimetrische Phophorsäurebestimmung mit Ammonium-Vanadat-Molybdat und ihre Anwendung in der Pflanzenanalyse. Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Bodenkd. 1952, 59, 235–247. [Google Scholar]
  24. Campbell, R.C. Reference Sufficiency Ranges for Plant Analysis in the Southern Region of the United States; Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin #394; North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Agronomic Division: Raleigh, NC, USA, 2009; p. 11.
  25. Cottenie, A. FAO Soils Bulletin 38/1, Soil and Plant Testing and Analysis; Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gulden, R.H.; Vessey, J.K. Penicillium bilaii inoculation increases root-hair production in field pea. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2000, 80, 801–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fröhlich, A.; Buddrus-Schiemann, K.; Durner, J.; Hartmann, A.; Rad, U. Von Response of barley to root colonization by Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134 under laboratory, greenhouse, and field conditions. J. Plant Interact. 2012, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lekfeldt, J.D.S.; Rex, M.; Mercy, F.; Magid, K.; Tlustoš, P.; Magid, J. Effect of bioeffectors and recycled P-fertiliser products on the growth of spring wheat. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2016, 3, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jing, J.; Ruia, Y.; Zhanga, F.; Rengel, Z.; Shen, J. Localized application of phosphorus and ammonium improves growth of maize seedlings by stimulating root proliferation and rhizosphere acidification. Field Crops Res. 2010, 119, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bittman, S.; Kowalenko, C.G.; Hunt, D.E.; Forge, T.A.; Wu, X. Starter phosphorus and broadcast nutrients on corn with contrasting colonization by mycorrhizae. Agron. J. 2006, 98, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chekanaia, V.; Chikowoa, R.; Vanlauwe, B. Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to nitrogen, phosphorus and rhizobia inoculation across variable soils in Zimbabwe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 266, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Deng, Y.; Chen, K.; Teng, W.; Zhan, A.; Tong, Y.; Feng, G.; Cui, Z.; Zhang, F.; Chenet, X. Is the Inherent Potential of Maize Roots Efficient for Soil Phosphorus Acquisition? PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hajabbasi, M.A.; Schumacher, T.E. Phosphorus effects on root growth and development in two maize genotypes. Plant Soil 1994, 158, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jiang, H.; Zhang, J.; Han, Z.; Yang, J.; Ge, C.; Wu, Q. Revealing new insights into different phosphorus-starving responses between two maize (Zea mays) inbred lines by transcriptomic and proteomic studies. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jia, X.; Liu, P.; Lynch, J.P. Greater lateral root branching density in maize improves phosphorus acquisition from low phosphorus soil. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 4961–4970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nkebiwe, P.M.; Weinmann, M.; Bar-Tal, A.; Müller, T. Fertilizer placement to improve crop nutrient acquisition and yield: A review and meta-analysis. Field Crops Res. 2016, 196, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Benckiser, G.; Christ, E.; Herbert, T.; Weiske, A.; Blome, J.; Hardt, M. The nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole-phosphat (DMPP)—Quantification and effects on soil metabolism. Plant Soil 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bharucha, U.; Patel, K.; Trivedi, U.B. Optimization of indole acetic acid production by Pseudomonas putida UB1 and its effect as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on mustard (Brassica nigra). Agric. Res. 2013, 2, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ögüt, M.; Er, F.; Neumann, G. Increased proton extrusion of wheat roots by inoculation with phosphorus solubilising microorganisms. Plant Soil 2011, 339, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Brown, M.E.; Hornby, D. Effects of nitrate and ammonium on wheat roots in gnotobiotic culture: Amino acids, cortical cell death and take-all (caused by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. Tritici). Soil Biol. Biochem. 1987, 19, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Imas, P.; Bar-Yosef, B.; Kafkafi, U.; Ganmore-Neumann, R. Release of carboxylic anions and protons by tomato roots in response to ammonium nitrate ratio and pH in nutrient solution. Plant Soil 1997, 191, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, H.; Menz, J.; Haussermann, I.; Benz, M.; Fujiwara, T.; Ludewig, U. 2015. High and Low Affinity Urea Root Uptake: Involvement of NIP5;1. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 1588–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Menz, J.; Li, Z.; Schulze, W.X.; Ludewig, U. Early nitrogen-deprivation responses in Arabidopsis roots reveal distinct differences on transcriptome and (phospho-) proteome levels between nitrate and ammonium nutrition. Plant J. 2016, 88, 717–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sommermann, L.; Geistlinger, J.; Wibberg, D.; Deubel, A.; Zwanzig, J.; Babin, D.; Schluter, A.; Schellenberg, I. Fungal community profiles in agricultural soils of a long-term field trial under different tillage, fertilization and crop rotation conditions analyzed by high-throughput ITS-amplicon sequencing. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Babin, D.; Deubel, A.; Jacquiod, S.; Sørensen, S.J.; Geistlinger, J.; Grosch, R.; Smalla, K. Impact of long-term agricultural management practices on soil prokaryotic communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yua, H.; Ning Ling, N.; Wang, T.; Zhub, C.; Wanga, Y.; Wanga, S.; Ga, Q. Responses of soil biological traits and bacterial communities to nitrogen fertilization mediate maize yields across three soil types. Soil Tillage Res. 2019, 185, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mahmood, T.; Kaiser, W.M.; Ali, R.; Ashraf, M.; Gulnaz, G.; Iqbal, Z. Ammonium versus nitrate nutrition of plants stimulates microbial activity in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 2005, 277, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 07 00038 g001 550
Figure 1. Shoot biomass (A), shoot P content (B), root dry matter (C), and total root length (D) of maize (cv Colisee) grown on a calcareous Loess subsoil (pH 7.6)—sand mixture (80/20% w/w), supplied with and without (Zero) P fertilization in the form of Rock-P (RP) or soluble Ca(H2PO4)2 (+P) and calcium nitrate fertilization. RP variants inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134 Proradix (Pro); SP11, Vitalin SP11 (SP11); Penicillium sp. PK 112 (BFOC); and Paenibacillus mucilaginosus (Paeni). Means of four replicates. One-way ANOVA, Tukey test. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Shoot biomass (A), shoot P content (B), root dry matter (C), and total root length (D) of maize (cv Colisee) grown on a calcareous Loess subsoil (pH 7.6)—sand mixture (80/20% w/w), supplied with and without (Zero) P fertilization in the form of Rock-P (RP) or soluble Ca(H2PO4)2 (+P) and calcium nitrate fertilization. RP variants inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134 Proradix (Pro); SP11, Vitalin SP11 (SP11); Penicillium sp. PK 112 (BFOC); and Paenibacillus mucilaginosus (Paeni). Means of four replicates. One-way ANOVA, Tukey test. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 07 00038 g001
Microorganisms 07 00038 g002 550
Figure 2. Shoot biomass (A), shoot P content, and concentration (B) of maize (cv Colisee) grown on a calcareous Loess subsoil pH 7.6—sand mixture (30/70% w/w), supplied with and without (Zero) P fertilization in the form of Rock-P (RP) or soluble Ca(H2PO4)2 (+P). RP variants with and without Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134 Proradix (Pro) inoculation in combination with Ca-nitrate (NO3−) or DMPP-stabilized ammonium (NH4+) fertilization. Means of five replicates. One-way ANOVA, Tukey test. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Shoot biomass (A), shoot P content, and concentration (B) of maize (cv Colisee) grown on a calcareous Loess subsoil pH 7.6—sand mixture (30/70% w/w), supplied with and without (Zero) P fertilization in the form of Rock-P (RP) or soluble Ca(H2PO4)2 (+P). RP variants with and without Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134 Proradix (Pro) inoculation in combination with Ca-nitrate (NO3−) or DMPP-stabilized ammonium (NH4+) fertilization. Means of five replicates. One-way ANOVA, Tukey test. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 07 00038 g002
Microorganisms 07 00038 g003 550
Figure 3. Shoot biomass (A) and total root length (B) of maize (cv Colisee) grown on a clay-loam, organic farming soil (pH 7.0), supplied with and without (No P) P fertilization in form of Rock-P or soluble triple superphosphate (TSP). N supply in the form of Ca-nitrate (NO3) or DMPP-stabilized ammonium. Microbial inoculants: Trichoderma harzianum T22 (Trianum P), Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134 (Proradix), Trichoderma harzianum OMG16 + 5 Bacillus strains (Combifector-A); Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 (Rhizovital), Paenibacillus mucilaginosus, Penicillium sp. PK 112 (BFOD), Vitalin SP11 (VitSP11), or no inoculation (NoBE). Means of five replicates. One-way ANOVA, Tukey test. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05); * indicates significant differences after pairwise comparison of PSM-inoculated variants versus the non-inoculated control with ammonium fertilization (t-test, p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Shoot biomass (A) and total root length (B) of maize (cv Colisee) grown on a clay-loam, organic farming soil (pH 7.0), supplied with and without (No P) P fertilization in form of Rock-P or soluble triple superphosphate (TSP). N supply in the form of Ca-nitrate (NO3) or DMPP-stabilized ammonium. Microbial inoculants: Trichoderma harzianum T22 (Trianum P), Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134 (Proradix), Trichoderma harzianum OMG16 + 5 Bacillus strains (Combifector-A); Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 (Rhizovital), Paenibacillus mucilaginosus, Penicillium sp. PK 112 (BFOD), Vitalin SP11 (VitSP11), or no inoculation (NoBE). Means of five replicates. One-way ANOVA, Tukey test. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05); * indicates significant differences after pairwise comparison of PSM-inoculated variants versus the non-inoculated control with ammonium fertilization (t-test, p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 07 00038 g003
Table
Table 1. Mineral nutritional status of maize (cv Colisee) grown on a clay-loam, organic farming soil (pH 7.0), supplied with and without (No P) P fertilization in the form of Rock-P or soluble triple superphosphate (TSP) and N supply in the form of Ca-nitrate (NO3) or DMPP-stabilized ammonium (NH4) as affected by different PSM inoculants (Figure 3).
Table 1. Mineral nutritional status of maize (cv Colisee) grown on a clay-loam, organic farming soil (pH 7.0), supplied with and without (No P) P fertilization in the form of Rock-P or soluble triple superphosphate (TSP) and N supply in the form of Ca-nitrate (NO3) or DMPP-stabilized ammonium (NH4) as affected by different PSM inoculants (Figure 3).
NPKMn
Shoot Mineral Concentration (mg g−1)
No P12.4 d2.0 d41.3 ab0.02 b
NH4_Rock-P25.6 ab2.5 ab45.9 ab0.02 b
NH4_ Rock-P _Trianum P35.2 ab *2.4 abc45.0 ab0.03 a *
NH4_ Rock-P _Proradix33.9 ab *2.3 abcd45.9 ab0.03 a *
NO3_ Rock-P _Proradix36.4 ab *2.6 a46.6 a0.03 a *
NH4_ Rock-P _Rhizovital34.6 ab *2.2 bcd44.0 ab0.03 a *
NH4_ Rock-P _Paenibacillus31.9 b *2.2 bcd42.9 ab0.03 a *
NH4_ Rock-P _BFOD37.4 a *2.3 abcd45.5 ab0.03 a *
NH4_ Rock-P _Vit SP1134.2 ab *2.2 bcd40.8 ab0.03 a *
NH4_ Rock-P _CombifectorA34.6 ab *2.1 cd41.2 ab0.03 a *
NO3_TSP35.0 ab *2.2 bcd39.5 b0.03 a *
Shoot Mineral Content (mg Plant−1)
No P45.7 d7.4 d151.6 d0.07 d
NH4_Rock-P271.5 bc19.5 bc356.6 bc0.24 bc
NH4_ Rock-P _Trianum P311.7 ab21.3 abc *398.8 ab *0.27 abc
NH4_ Rock-P _Proradix330.9 a *22.2 ab *448.9 a *0.32 a *
NO3_ Rock-P _Proradix250.2 c17.7 c317.0 c0.22 c
NH4_ Rock-P _Rhizovital328.1 a20.9 abc415.1 ab *0.28 abc *
NH4_ Rock-P _Paenibacillus302.6 abc21.4 abc409.9 ab *0.27 abc
NH4_ Rock-P _BFOD318.3 ab19.6 bc386.2 abc0.27 abc
NH4_ Rock-P _Vit SP11339.9 a *22.0 abc404.7 ab *0.29 abc *
NH4_ Rock-P _CombifectorA341.7 a *20.4 bc405.0 ab *0.30 ab *
NO3_TSP289.0 abc25.0 a443.1 a0.26 abc
Means of five replicates. One-way ANOVA, Tukey test. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05); * indicates significant differences after pairwise comparison of PSM-inoculated variants versus the non-inoculated control with ammonium fertilization (t-test, p < 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Shoot dry matter, P and N-nutritional status during early growth (42 DAS), and final grain yield of maize (cv Limagrain 30.600) on an alkaline clay loam soil (Vertic Xerofluvent, pH 8.6) with and without (no P) P fertilization in the form of triple superphosphate (TSP) or di-ammonium phosphate (DAP). Nitrogen was supplied as DMPP-stabilized ammonium sulfate (stabilized NH4+) or non-stabilized Urea-DAP. In the PSM variants, phosphate fertilization was replaced by selected PSM products: Combifector-A (Combi-A), Combifector-B (Combi-B), Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 (FZB42) + humic acids (HA), B. amyloliquefaciens + seaweed extract. Nutrient (P, N) data refer to shoot concentrations in % and to shoot contents per plant (data in brackets). Means of four replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences. One way ANOVA (p < 0.05).
Table 2. Shoot dry matter, P and N-nutritional status during early growth (42 DAS), and final grain yield of maize (cv Limagrain 30.600) on an alkaline clay loam soil (Vertic Xerofluvent, pH 8.6) with and without (no P) P fertilization in the form of triple superphosphate (TSP) or di-ammonium phosphate (DAP). Nitrogen was supplied as DMPP-stabilized ammonium sulfate (stabilized NH4+) or non-stabilized Urea-DAP. In the PSM variants, phosphate fertilization was replaced by selected PSM products: Combifector-A (Combi-A), Combifector-B (Combi-B), Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 (FZB42) + humic acids (HA), B. amyloliquefaciens + seaweed extract. Nutrient (P, N) data refer to shoot concentrations in % and to shoot contents per plant (data in brackets). Means of four replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences. One way ANOVA (p < 0.05).
TreatmentShoot DM(42 DAS)
(g)		Grain Yield
(t ha−1)		Shoot-P(42 DAS)
% (mg plant−1)		Shoot-N(42 DAS)
% (mg plant−1)
Stabilized NH4+ no P33.3 c15.3 d0.45 a (0.15 b)3.3 a (1.08 c)
Stabilized NH4+ + TSP41.2 ab (+ 24%)16.1 ab (+ 5.2%)0.48 a (0.20 ab)3.2 a (1.35 ab)
Stabilized NH4+ + Combi-A42.4 ab (+ 27%)15.9 ab (+ 3.9%)0.47 a (0.20 ab)3.3 a (1.42 ab)
Stabilized NH4+ + Combi-B46.7 a (+ 40%)16.0 ab (+ 4.0%)0.48 a (0.22 a)3.4 a (1.58 a)
Stabilized NH4+ + FZB42+HA44.4 a (+ 33%)16.3 a (+ 6.5%)0.47 a (0.21 a)3.3 a (1.48 a)
Stabilized NH4+ + B. amylolique-faciens + seaweed extract45.6 a (+ 37%)15.6 bcd (+ 1.9%)0.44 a (0.20 ab)3.3 a (1.50 a)
Urea+DAP (farmers practice)36.6 c (+ 10%)15.8 abc (+ 3.2%)0.48 a (0.18 ab)3.2 a (1.35 ab)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mpanga, I.K.; Nkebiwe, P.M.; Kuhlmann, M.; Cozzolino, V.; Piccolo, A.; Geistlinger, J.; Berger, N.; Ludewig, U.; Neumann, G. The Form of N Supply Determines Plant Growth Promotion by P-Solubilizing Microorganisms in Maize. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7020038

AMA Style

Mpanga IK, Nkebiwe PM, Kuhlmann M, Cozzolino V, Piccolo A, Geistlinger J, Berger N, Ludewig U, Neumann G. The Form of N Supply Determines Plant Growth Promotion by P-Solubilizing Microorganisms in Maize. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(2):38. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7020038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mpanga, Isaac Kwadwo, Peteh Mehdi Nkebiwe, Mira Kuhlmann, Vincenza Cozzolino, Alessandro Piccolo, Jörg Geistlinger, Nils Berger, Uwe Ludewig, and Günter Neumann. 2019. "The Form of N Supply Determines Plant Growth Promotion by P-Solubilizing Microorganisms in Maize" Microorganisms 7, no. 2: 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7020038

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop