Next Article in Journal
Carbon Dots for Intracellular pH Sensing with Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy
Next Article in Special Issue
Photocatalytic Performance and Degradation Pathway of Rhodamine B with TS-1/C3N4 Composite under Visible Light
Previous Article in Journal
In Situ Formation of Nanoporous Silicon on a Silicon Wafer via the Magnesiothermic Reduction Reaction (MRR) of Diatomaceous Earth
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 10
Issue 4
10.3390/nano10040602
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Novel Architecture Titanium Carbide (Ti3C2Tx) MXene Cocatalysts toward Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production: A Mini-Review

by
Van-Huy Nguyen
1,2,*,
Ba-Son Nguyen
3,
Chechia Hu
4,
Chinh Chien Nguyen
5,6,
Dang Le Tri Nguyen
5,
Minh Tuan Nguyen Dinh
7,
Dai-Viet N. Vo
8,
Quang Thang Trinh
9,
Mohammadreza Shokouhimehr
10,
Amirhossein Hasani
11,
Soo Young Kim
12,* and
Quyet Van Le
5,*
1
Department for Management of Science and Technology Development, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
2
Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
3
Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials for Energy and Environmental Applications, Lac Hong University, Bien Hoa 810000, Vietnam
4
Department of Chemical Engineering, R&D center for Membrane Technology and Research Center for Circular Economy, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chungli Dist., Taoyuan City 32023, Taiwan
5
Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Danang 550000, Vietnam
6
Faculty of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
7
Faculty of Chemical Engineering, University of Science and Technology, The University of Da Nang, 54 Nguyen Luong Bang, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
8
Center of Excellence for Green Energy and Environmental Nanomaterials (CE@GrEEN), Nguyen Tat Thanh University, 300A Nguyen Tat Thanh, District 4, Ho Chi Minh City 755414, Vietnam
9
Cambridge Centre for Advanced Research and Education in Singapore (CARES), Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE), 1 Create Way, Singapore 138602, Singapore
10
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Research Institute of Advanced Materials, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
11
School of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea
12
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(4), 602; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10040602
Submission received: 26 February 2020 / Revised: 17 March 2020 / Accepted: 23 March 2020 / Published: 25 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Semiconductor Nanomaterials in Photocatalysis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Low dimensional transition metal carbide and nitride (MXenes) have been emerging as frontier materials for energy storage and conversion. Ti3C2Tx was the first MXenes that discovered and soon become the most widely investigated among the MXenes family. Interestingly, Ti3C2Tx exhibits ultrahigh catalytic activity towards the hydrogen evolution reaction. In addition, Ti3C2Tx is electronically conductive, and its optical bandgap is tunable in the visible region, making it become one of the most promising candidates for the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). In this review, we provide comprehensive strategies for the utilization of Ti3C2Tx as a catalyst for improving solar-driven HER, including surface functional groups engineering, structural modification, and cocatalyst coupling. In addition, the reaming obstacle for using these materials in a practical system is evaluated. Finally, the direction for the future development of these materials featuring high photocatalytic activity toward HER is discussed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

To date, sustainable solar hydrogen (H2) production, which directly produces by utilizing semiconductor photocatalysts, could provide a promising and environmental-friendly approach to solve the worldwide energy issues and reduce the dependence on fossil fuels [1,2]. Particularly, enormous progress has been made in developing a new system of photocatalysts such as transition metal dichalcogenides [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15], transition metal oxide (TMOs) [16,17], transient metal sulfides (TMSs), graphitic carbon nitride (g–C3N4) [18,19,20,21,22], metal–organic framework (MOFs) [23,24,25], transition metal nitride (TMNs) [26], and transition metal carbide (TMCs) [27,28,29,30] that could efficiently enhance the H2 production, and readily scale up for commercialization [2].
As an advanced and broad group of novel nanostructured materials, MXenes has been discovered and synthesized from the parent layered solids MAX phases (as shown in Figure 1) [31].
In essence, the chemical formula of MAX phases is Mn+1AXn, which is defined by Barsoum [33,34,35,36,37]. In detail, the M element stands for transition metals from groups 3 (Sc), 4 (Ti, Zr, and Hf), 5 (V, Nb, and Ta), and 6 (Cr and Mo), the A element represents from groups 12 (Cd), 13 (Al, Ga, In, and Tl), 14 (Si, Ge, Sn, and Pb), 15 (P and As), or 16 (S), and the X element is C and/or N [33,38,39]. MXenes are generally prepared by selectively getting rid of the element of A from the parent MAX phase to form Mn+1XnTx (n = 1–3), where Tx is the surface termination groups ((–O), (–F), and (–OH)) [31]. MXenes materials, which offer many advantages electronic, optical, plasmonic, and thermoelectric properties [36], have attracted much interest recently. They are currently explored for a variety of applications, including energy, environment, catalysis, photocatalysis, optical devices, electronics, biomedicals, sensors, electromagnetic, others, etc. (Figure 2) [40,41,42,43]. Among MXenes, many efforts have been devoted to promoting titanium carbide (Ti3C2Tx) as the most promising candidate of cocatalysts [44,45,46]. Based on the published literature dealing with MXenes, which was taken from 2011–2019 on the Web of Science, there was about 70% of researches on MXenes associated with Ti3C2Tx, as seen in the third ring of the pie chart in Figure 2 [40]. It also notes that the Ti3C2Tx also shows a high potential to replace the expensive Pt cocatalyst in photocatalysis. In 2017, Alhabeb et al. have provided an excellent report to give step-by-step guidance to preparing of Ti3C2Tx by using different etchants (HF and in situ HF) and delamination methods (Figure 3a) [38]. Their corresponded scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained and shown in Figure 3b–g. For detail, Ti3AlC2 sample show compactly layered morphology (Figure 3b), while the morphology of the multilayered Ti3C2Tx samples was influenced by weight percent (wt %) of HF (Figure 3c–e). On the other hand, the morphology of the multilayered NH4–Ti3C2Tx sample (Figure 3f) and MILD-Ti3C2Tx sample (Figure 3g) are structurally similar to that of 5F–Ti3C2Tx multilayered powders (Figure 3e). Theoretically, the Ti3C2Tx fulfill the prerequisite requirement condition for applications as catalysts for HER. It has been reported that the O and F terminated Ti3C2 are metallic based semiconductors with a conductivity up to 9880 S·cm−1, which is higher than that of graphene [47]. This indicates that the charge transfer between Ti3C2 to the active site is superior to most of the reported semiconducting catalysts. Furthermore, the H* adsorption energy on the surface of Ti3C2 is close to 0, making it the best among noble metal free catalysts for application in HER [48]. However, most MXenes including Ti3C2Tx are semiconductors with indirect bandgaps [49]. To apply as photocatalysts, T3C2Tx needs to pair with other photoactive materials such as TiO2, CdS, g–C3N4 and metal organic frameworks (MOFs). Although, the development of MXenes for wide-range application in recent years have been thoroughly summarized and discussed [34,35,36,49,50,51], a review that focuses on Ti3C2Tx for photocatalytic HER has not been reported yet.
In this review, we present the use of Ti3C2Tx as the most potential and promising cocatalysts toward photocatalytic hydrogen production. Based on the recent research works, the influence on different morphology (nanotubes, nanoscrolls, quantum dots, etc.), surface termination groups (–F, –OH, and –O), and photocatalyst systems (titania (TiO2), graphitic carbon nitride (g–C3N4) coupled Ti3C2 photocatalysts, etc.) are reviewed and intensified. Additionally, attention and outlook on critical challenges, prospects, and potential applications for Ti3C2Tx cocatalysts toward sustainable solar hydrogen production are also highlighted.

2. Coupled Morphological and Structural Ti3C2Tx Cocatalysts

Since the morphology of photocatalysts could directly influence the photocatalytic process, active sites, and charge transfer, various nanostructures of Ti3C2Tx photocatalysts have been explored to improve the efficiency of H2 production. However, it has not been shown yet, which types of morphology and structure of Ti3C2Tx cocatalysts perform the best photocatalytic H2 production rate. In this section, the photocatalytic activity over different morphological and structural Ti3C2Tx cocatalysts was adequately highlighted and critically evaluated in terms of the H2 production rate (μmol·gcat−1·h−1) for convenient comparative purposes.
Su et al. prepared a series of Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 composite photocatalysts with a monolayer and multilayers Ti3C2Tx as the cocatalyst (as shown in Figure 4a) [52]. The result showed that a monolayer Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 composite exhibited the superior H2 production rate (2650 μmol·gcat−1·h−1) under a 200 W Hg lamp integrated with a cutoff filter of 285–325 nm, which had more than nine-fold and two-fold higher, compared to the pure TiO2 (290 μmol·gcat−1·h−1) and multilayer counterpart (920 μmol·gcat−1·h−1), respectively. The enhancement of performance is possible due to the advanced electrical conductivity of a monolayer Ti3C2Tx and the effective charge-carrier separation at the Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 interface. To propose a new morphology, Li et al. designed Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 nanoflowers, which performed an outstanding H2 production rate, compared with that of pure TiO2 (as shown in Figure 4b) [53]. In detail, the Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 nanoflower could reach to 526 μmol·gcat−1·h−1 in the H2 production rate under a 300 W Xe arc lamp, which was more than four-fold higher than that of the TiO2 nanobelts (121.82 μmol·gcat−1·h−1). It notes that under the same experimental conditions, the H2 production rate was 371.17 μmol·gcat−1·h−1 over the Pt/TiO2 nanosheet. It suggests that the noble metal-free Ti3C2Tx was considered as an alternative cocatalyst to replace the expensive and precious noble metals, such as Pt, Au, etc. To further boost the H2 production activity, Yuan et al. prepared the Ti3C2Tx nanofibers (NFs) structure by hydrolyzation and selective etching of Ti3AlC2 MAX ceramics (Figure 4c) [54]. Compared with traditional Ti3C2 flakes, the Ti3C2 NFs could provide a much higher BET (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller) surface area and expose more catalytic active sites, leading to enhanced H2 production activity, high cycling stability, and long-term viability. Very recently, Li et al. had successfully designed Ti3C2Tx quantum dots (QDs) by a self-assembly method, which their schematic synthesis of g–C3N4@Ti3C2Tx QDs composites was shown in Figure 4d [55]. As expected, g–C3N4@Ti3C2Tx QDs composites performed the best photocatalytic activity (5111.8 μmol·gcat−1·h−1) under artificial sunlight (300 W Xe arc lamp integrated with an AM-1.5 filter), which was nearly ten-fold higher than that of g–C3N4/Ti3C2Tx sheets (524.3 μmol·gcat−1·h−1). Compared to the traditional Ti3C2Tx sheets, Ti3C2Tx QDs offered more abundant active edge sites, and excellent electronic conductivity. Additionally, the photoexcited carriers in g–C3N4@Ti3C2Tx QDs composites could be effectively separated to rapidly take part in photocatalytic H2 production activity, leading to enhanced photocatalytic performance efficiently. Therefore, owing to excellent physical properties, g–C3N4@Ti3C2Tx QDs composites performed a remarkable enhancement in the photocatalytic H2 production rate of 5111.8 μmol·gcat−1·h−1, indicating its high potential to scale up and accelerate the H2 production via the green photocatalysis approach.
The synthesis of different morphologies of Ti3C2Tx cocatalysts was successfully proposed. Based on the recent studies, morphologies of Ti3C2Tx (nanotubes, nanoscrolls, quantum dots, etc.), which might provide more BET surface area to enrich the active adsorption sites, and inhibit the recombination of e−–h+ pairs, resulting in effective influence to the photocatalytic activity, high cycling stability, and long-term viability.

3. Modified Ti3C2Tx Cocatalysts with Surface Termination Groups

In general, surface termination groups (–F, –OH, and –O) of Ti3C2Tx, which are predominantly dependent on the synthesis methods, have profoundly altered their physicochemical properties [56]. Based on theoretical calculations, many studies suggested that surface termination groups strongly influence the stability, electronic, optical, and transport properties of Ti3C2Tx [57,58,59,60]. Due to improving the photocatalytic activity toward sustainable solar hydrogen production, there has been motivation to enhance and control the physicochemical properties of Ti3C2Tx through surface termination groups. Li et al. found that the Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 hybrids, which synthesized through simple calcination of F-Ti3C2Tx, exhibited potential photocatalytic activity. Its performance was two-fold higher than that of the Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 hybrids with calcining OH-Ti3C2Tx [37]. On the other hand, Ran et al. used density functional theory (DFT) calculations for designing and exploring the potential of novel Ti3C2Tx nanoparticles as a promising H2 production cocatalyst [61]. They replaced the (–F) terminations by (–O)/(–OH) terminations by the hydrothermal treatment, and found that (–O)/(–OH) terminations play a notable role for photocatalytic activity. This result was consistent with the previous finding by Sun et al. [56], who observed significant enhancement of H2 production (88 μmol·gcat−1·h−1) over O-Ti3C2Tx, compared to control samples. To further modify the surface termination groups of Ti3C2Tx, Yang et al. successfully prepared O-Ti3C2Tx/CdS hybrids through the radiofrequency oxygen plasma method (O2/N2, 2.2 Pa, 500 °C, 1400 W, 2.45 GHz, and 30 min), providing (a) sufficient catching water molecules and hydrogen ions on the surface of the catalyst, and (b) stable transfer channel for electrons to repress the recombination of e−–h+ pairs [62]. In another approach, Xu et al. carried out a plasma treatment (N2/H2, atmosphere, 500 °C, 1400 W, and 30 min) for preparing layered g–C3N4/plasma-treated Ti3C2Tx photocatalyst [63]. Based on analyzed results by Raman, FTIR, and XPS, Xu et al. observed an increase of Ti–O with a decrease of Ti–C, Ti–F, and Ti–OH. Additionally, the plasma-treated Ti3C2Tx photocatalyst worked as an excellent acceptor of photogenerated electrons, leading to substantially reinforce the photocatalytic activity. Though the surface termination groups could be modified by several methods, such as hydrothermal treatment, simple calcination, plasma treatment, etc., more studies that elucidate the modification mechanism of surface termination groups need to be paid attention in the future.

4. The Design of Ti3C2Tx Composite Photocatalysts

4.1. Couple with Transition Metal Oxide (TMOs)

Transition metal oxide, such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), coupled photocatalysts have attracted dramatically increasing interest in the area of photocatalytic hydrogen generation [64,65,66]. Their photocatalytic activities have been markedly improved through the efforts of many research groups. However, its large bandgap and fast charge recombination limit its efficiency. To overcome this limitation, Ti3C2Tx has been considered as promising cocatalysts for hydrogen production with TiO2 as the photocatalyst. Zhuang has successfully prepared TiO2/Ti3C2Tx nanocomposites by the electrostatic self-assembly technique (Figure 5) [67]. Owing to the highly efficient separation of photogenerated carriers, which derived from the intense interfacial contact between TiO2 nanofibers and Ti3C2Tx nanosheets, the photocatalytic performance over TiO2/Ti3C2Tx nanocomposites was significantly improved. The H2 production rate was up to 6979 μmol·gcat−1·h−1 using a 10% methanol solution as the sacrificial electron donors under a 300 W Xe lamp, which was 3.8 times higher than that of pure TiO2 nanofibers. There was no hydrogen production capacity over Ti3C2Tx nanosheets due to its metallic character.
To simplify the synthesis method, simple calcination was first proposed by Li et al. to prepare truncated octahedral bipyramidal TiO2 (TOB-T)/Ti3C2Tx hybrids [37]. The resultant TiO2/Ti3C2Tx hybrids retained the multilayer structure, and TiO2 exhibited a truncated octahedral bipyramidal structure with exposed (001) and (101) facets. A surface heterojunction between (101) and (001) facets was established, and it could prevent the recombination of photogenerated carriers in TiO2. Moreover, the remaining Ti3C2Tx could act as a cocatalyst to accelerate the migration of photoinduced electrons because of its high electronic conductivity. Meanwhile, the concentration of fluorine sharply decreased during calcination, thereby reducing the toxicity and increasing the conductivity of the samples. They pointed out that Ti3C2Tx could enhance the photocatalytic activity of those composite photocatalysts due to the Schottky junction between Ti3C2Tx and TiO2 and its excellent electronic conductivity. Besides TiO2, ZnO has also been investigated for hydrogen production [68]. It was experimentally demonstrated that the ZnO nanorods (NRs)/Ti3C2Tx hybrids exhibited the inferior photocatalytic H2 production activity (456 μmol·h−1), while pure ZnO NRs displayed no performance [68]. However, the photocatalytic activity of the ZnO/Ti3C2Tx composite was still much lower compared to the TiO2/Ti3C2Tx, thus, more investigation is necessary.

4.2. Couple with Transient Metal Sulfides (TMSs)

Transition metal surface such as CdS [69,70,71], CdSe [72], MoS2 [73,74,75], and WS2 [76,77,78] has been demonstrated as potential catalysts for electrocatalytic and photocatalytic HER. Therefore, the coupling of these materials with Ti3C2Tx might produce the composite with unprecedented performance in photocatalytic HER. As expected, Ran et al. coupled O–Ti3C2Tx with cadmium sulfide (CdS) via a hydrothermal method to yield a composite catalyst for HER with very high performance [61]. In specific, the catalysts with the optimized composition (2.5 wt % Ti3C2Tx) can produce up to 14,342 μmol·gcat−1·h−1, which was higher than that of Pt-CdS (10,978 μmol·gcat−1·h−1). The HR-TEM and SEM images of the O–Ti3C2Tx coupled CdS nanoparticles are shown in Figure 6a–b. The high photocatalytic HER performance of the O-Ti3C2Tx/CdS composite attributed to very low free energy for atomic H adsorption on the surface of O–Ti3C2Tx (Figure 6c) and efficient charge generation and separation upon light at the interface of the composites (Figure 6d–e). Similarly, Xiao et al. coupled Ti3C2Tx with CdS nanorod to construct a Schottky heterojunction for photocatalytic HER [79]. As a result, the CdS nanorod/Ti3C2Tx nanosheet exhibited a performance 7-fold higher than that of pristine CdS [79]. The improvement was postulated to originate from the synergistic effect between the CdS nanorod and Ti3C2Tx nanosheets that improves light absorption, charge separation, and conductivity of the composite catalysts. Tie et al. decorated ZnS nanoparticles with Ti3C2Tx nanosheets to yield photocatalytic HER with a production rate of 502.6 μmol·gcat−1·h−1 under optimal conditions, is almost 4-fold higher than pure ZnS (124.6 μmol·gcat−1·h−1) [80]. Besides, the alloy transition metal sulfide/Ti3C2Tx was also investigated. For example, Cheng et al. demonstrated a high-performance composite for photocatalytic HER composed of CdLa2S4 and Ti3C2Tx nanocomposite [81]. In specific, these composite nanomaterials yield photocatalytic HER with the H2 production rate of 11,182.4 μmol·gcat−1·h−1, and apparent quantum efficiency reached 15.6% at 420 nm. The performance of CdLa2S4/Ti3C2Tx nanocomposite, therefore, improves the production rate up to 13.4 times compared to that of pristine CdLa2S4 and even higher than that of Pt/CdLa2S4. To sum up, Ti3C2Tx couple with TMSs could reach to a desirable level. In detail, 2.5 wt % Ti3C2Tx/CdS and ZnS/Ti3C2Tx nanosheets exhibited very attractive photocatalytic activity, making them good candidates for photocatalytic HER.

4.3. Couple with the Metal–Organic Framework

MOFs and their derivative have been emerging as efficient catalysts for photo electrocatalytic HER. The first combination of Ti3C2Tx/MOFs composite was reported by Tian et al. in 2019 [82]. The TEM images in Figure 7a,b indicated that the MOFs were well connected with the MOFs. As a result, the Ti3C2Tx/MOFs composite displays photocatalytic activity better than the Pt decorated MOFs (2 wt % Pt/UiO-66-NH2). The performance of Ti3C2Tx/MOFs can be observed in Figure 7c. The schematic illustration of energy band alignment between Ti3C2Tx and MOFs is shown in Figure 7d. Under sunlight irradiation, the electron-hole pairs were generated in MOFs. Owing to the good contact and conductivity, the photo-induced electron can be easily transferred to the Ti3C2Tx surface to participate in the HER, thus, improving the overall performance of the composite catalysts.

4.4. Coupled with Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g–C3N4)

Graphitic carbon nitride (g–C3N4) coupled photocatalysts have attracted dramatically increasing interest in the area of visible-light-induced photocatalytic hydrogen generation due to the unique electronic band structure and high thermal and chemical stability of g–C3N4 [83,84,85]. Besides, the work had been done by Li et al. in the previous section, g–C3N4@Ti3C2Tx QDs [55], another study that couples Ti3C2Tx/g–C3N4 has also been reported. Typically, Su et al. constructed a heterojunction using Ti3C2Tx and g–C3N4 nanosheets via the electrostatic self-assembly method [86]. A small amount of Ti3C2Tx was loaded onto g–C3N4, with a concentration that ranged from 1% to 5%. Interestingly, the Ti3C2Tx/g–C3N4 exhibits significantly improved photocatalytic activity towards HER compared to that of pristine g–C3N4 [86]. Instead of using pristine g–C3N4, Lin et al. used O-doped g–C3N4 to form the heterostructure with Ti3C2Tx to improve the H2 production rate of catalysts two-fold [87]. The fabrication process for constructing Ti3C2Tx/O-doped g–C3N4 is shown in Figure 8a. The SEM and TEM images in Figure 8b–d indicates that well interspersed Ti3C2Tx/O-doped g–C3N4 heterostructure was obtained. As a result, the Ti3C2Tx/O-doped g–C3N4 yield H2 with a production rate of 25,124 μmol·gcat−1·h−1, whereas, pristine O-doped g–C3N4 and Ti3C2Tx/pristine g–C3N4 exhibit a lower H2 generation rate of 13,745 and 15,573 μmol·gcat−1·h−1, respectively. Figure 8e indicates that the electron from O-doped g–C3N4 can be easily transferred to Ti3C2Tx for the HER. These results suggested that g–C3N4 is a very good photoactive material to pair with Ti3C2Tx to yield efficient photocatalytic HER. However, the research related to this topic is still very limited, thus it needs more investigation in the near future.

4.5. Ternary Composites

Apart from binary composites, ternary composites of Ti3C2Tx have also been rationally developed. To obtain the ternary composite catalyst, Tial et al. first introduced TiO2 onto the surface of Ti3C2Tx via thermal annealing at 600 °C under N2 atmosphere [88]. After that, the Zr–MOF (UiO-66-NH2) was growth on Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 using a facile hydrothermal approach. The schematic illustration of the synthesis procedure is shown in Figure 9a. The TEM displaying the ternary phase of the composite is presented in Figure 9b. It can be observed that the ternary structure was well established. As a consequence, the ternary composite (Ti3C2Tx/TiO2/UIO-66-NH2) exhibited a performance two times higher than that of the binary composite (Ti3C2Tx/UIO-66-NH2). The improvement in the catalytic activity of the Ti3C2Tx/TiO2/UIO-66-NH2) not only comes from the improvement of the light absorption by using a double light absorber (TiO2/UIO-66-NH2) but also the enhancement of the charge separation of collection efficiency. The working mechanism of the binary and ternary composite was clearly illustrated in Figure 9c. Additionally, by taking advantage of the ternary composites with the composition of MoxS/TiO2/Ti3C2Tx, Li et al. improved the H2 production rate up to 10,505.8 μmol·gcat−1·h−1, which was 193 times compared to that of pristine TiO2 [46]. Similarly, many other ternary composites have been constructed with excellent photocatalytic activity towards HER such as MoxS@TiO2@Ti3C2Tx [46], Cu/TiO2@Ti3C2Tx [89], 1T–MoS2/Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 [90], 1T–WS2@TiO2@Ti3C2Tx [91], Cu2O/(001)/TiO2/Ti3C2Tx [92], Ti3C2Tx/TiO2/g–C3N4 [93], g–C3N4/Ti3C2Tx/Pt [45], CdS/MoS2/Ti3C2Tx [94], and TiO2/Ti3C2Tx/CoSx [95]. However, it is noted that a multicomponent photocatalytic hybrid composed of MXene with other cocatalysts are still in an early stage and requires further efforts.

5. Comparison of the Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production

To sum up, a detailed summary and comparison of recently reported Ti3C2Tx cocatalysts toward photocatalytic hydrogen production are given in Table 1. Although the experimental reaction conditions were different, we compared the photocatalytic activity in terms of the H2 evolution rate. Then, all the evolution rate of H2 were obtained and transformed into a logical unit (μmol·gcat−1·h−1) for acceptable comparative purposes. We found that Ti3C2Tx/O-doped g–C3N4 achieved interest in the H2 evolution rate (25,124 μmol·gcat−1·h−1). To further understand the photocatalytic activity of MXenes, a broad comparison was collected for different types of MXenes (as shown in Table 2). In addition to Ti3C2Tx, only a few studies using other types of MXenes cocatalysts, such as Nb2CTx [96] and Ti2C [97], for hydrogen production. Interestingly, the hybrid composite of Zn0.5Cd0.5S and Ti2C/TiO2 exhibited an attractive H2 production rate (32,560 μmol·gcat−1·h−1) [97]. This photocatalytic enhancement might be contributed by the effective light absorption and the efficient separation of electron-hole pairs.

6. Summary and Perspectives

In conclusion, Ti3C2Tx exhibited excellent catalytic properties toward photocatalytic HER. However, the property of Ti3C2Tx was strongly affected by its surface functional groups and coupled materials. Specifically, the O terminated Ti3C2Tx offered the best catalytic activity. The performance of Ti3C3Tx could also be improved by paring with other photoactive materials such as TiO2, ZnO, MoS2, WS2, CdS, and graphitic carbon nitride. The composite materials not only improved light absorption but also enhanced the charge separation and active sites. Thus improving the overall performance Ti3C2Tx under UV-vis light irradiation. Nonetheless, there were still limitations that hinder the application of Ti3C2Tx for practical applications such as scalability and stability. The future development of Ti3C2Tx as photocatalysts can be extended into the following directions: (1) developing a novel method for production of Ti3C2Tx in large scale at a mild condition such as a lower temperature, less toxic etchant, and solution-processable; (2) constructing novel functional groups on the surface of Ti3C2Tx for improving the catalytic properties; (3) designing novel materials to couple with Ti3C2Tx for further enhancing the photocatalytic activity such as oxide perovskite and halide perovskite can be considered; and (4) improving the stability of Ti3C2Tx for improving the lifetime of catalysts under working through structural engineering or passivation.

Author Contributions

V.-H.N, S.Y.K, and Q.V.L conceived the idea and supervised the project. All authors wrote and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Creative Materials Discovery Program through the NRF funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (grant number 2017M3D1A1039379) and the Basic Research Laboratory of the NRF funded by the Korean government (grant number 2018R1A4A1022647). The authors gratefully acknowledge Lac Hong University, Vietnam for the financial and equipment support under grant number LHU-RF-TE-18-01-09.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

  1. Bockris, J. Energy: The Solar-Hydrogen Alternative; Halsted Press: New York, NY, USA, 1975; 381p. [Google Scholar]
  2. Huang, C.-W.; Nguyen, B.-S.; Wu, J.C.S.; Nguyen, V.-H. A current perspective for photocatalysis towards the hydrogen production from biomass-derived organic substances and water. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nguyen, T.P.; Nguyen, D.L.T.; Nguyen, V.-H.; Le, T.-H.; Ly, Q.V.; Vo, D.-V.N.; Nguyen, Q.V.; Le, H.S.; Jang, H.W.; Kim, S.Y.; et al. Facile synthesis of WS2 hollow spheres and their hydrogen evolution reaction performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 505, 144574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tekalgne, M.A.; Nguyen, K.V.; Nguyen, D.L.T.; Nguyen, V.-H.; Nguyen, T.P.; Vo, D.-V.N.; Trinh, Q.T.; Hasani, A.; Do, H.H.; Lee, T.H.; et al. Hierarchical molybdenum disulfide on carbon nanotube–reduced graphene oxide composite paper as efficient catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 823, 153897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nguyen, T.P.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, T.H.; Jang, H.W.; Le, Q.V.; Kim, I.T. Facile synthesis of W2C@WS2 alloy nanoflowers and their hydrogen generation performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 504, 144389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tekalgne, M.A.; Hasani, A.; Heo, D.Y.; Van Le, Q.; Nguyen, T.P.; Lee, T.H.; Ahn, S.H.; Jang, H.W.; Kim, S.Y. SnO2@WS2/p-Si Heterostructure Photocathode for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hasani, A.; Le, Q.V.; Tekalgne, M.; Choi, M.-J.; Lee, T.H.; Jang, H.W.; Kim, S.Y. Direct synthesis of two-dimensional MoS2 on p-type Si and application to solar hydrogen production. NPG Asia Mater. 2019, 11, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hasani, A.; Van Le, Q.; Tekalgne, M.; Choi, M.-J.; Choi, S.; Lee, T.H.; Kim, H.; Ahn, S.H.; Jang, H.W.; Kim, S.Y. Fabrication of a WS2/p-Si Heterostructure Photocathode Using Direct Hybrid Thermolysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 29910–29916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tekalgne, M.; Hasani, A.; Le, Q.V.; Nguyen, T.P.; Choi, K.S.; Lee, T.H.; Jang, H.W.; Luo, Z.; Kim, S.Y. CdSe Quantum Dots Doped WS2 Nanoflowers for Enhanced Solar Hydrogen Production. Phys. Status Solidi A Appl. Res. 2019, 216, 1800853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tekalgne, M.; Hasani, A.; Van Le, Q.; Kim, S.Y. Transition metal dichalcogenide-based composites for hydrogen production. Funct. Compos. Struct. 2019, 1, 012001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guo, W.; Le, Q.V.; Do, H.H.; Hasani, A.; Tekalgne, M.; Bae, S.-R.; Lee, T.H.; Jang, H.W.; Ahn, S.H.; Kim, S.Y. Ni3Se4@MoSe2 Composites for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hasani, A.; Tekalgne, M.; Le, Q.V.; Jang, H.W.; Kim, S.Y. Two-dimensional materials as catalysts for solar fuels: hydrogen evolution reaction and CO2 reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 430–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, W.; Le, Q.V.; Hasani, A.; Lee, T.H.; Jang, H.W.; Luo, Z.; Kim, S.Y. MoSe2-GO/rGO Composite Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Polymers 2018, 10, 1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Nguyen, T.P.; Le, Q.V.; Choi, S.; Lee, T.H.; Hong, S.-P.; Choi, K.S.; Jang, H.W.; Lee, M.H.; Park, T.J.; Kim, S.Y. Surface extension of MeS2 (Me = Mo or W) nanosheets by embedding MeSx for hydrogen evolution reaction. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 292, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hasani, A.; Nguyen, T.P.; Tekalgne, M.; Van Le, Q.; Choi, K.S.; Lee, T.H.; Jung Park, T.; Jang, H.W.; Kim, S.Y. The role of metal dopants in WS2 nanoflowers in enhancing the hydrogen evolution reaction. Appl. Catal. A 2018, 567, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Do, H.H.; Nguyen, D.L.T.; Nguyen, X.C.; Le, T.-H.; Nguyen, T.P.; Trinh, Q.T.; Ahn, S.H.; Vo, D.-V.N.; Kim, S.Y.; Le, Q.V. Recent progress in TiO2-based photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction: A review. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 3653–3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Qin, Y.; Li, H.; Lu, J.; Meng, F.; Ma, C.; Yan, Y.; Meng, M. Nitrogen-doped hydrogenated TiO2 modified with CdS nanorods with enhanced optical absorption, charge separation and photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 384, 123275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shi, W.; Li, M.; Huang, X.; Ren, H.; Yan, C.; Guo, F. Facile synthesis of 2D/2D Co3(PO4)2/g-C3N4 heterojunction for highly photocatalytic overall water splitting under visible light. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mishra, A.; Mehta, A.; Basu, S.; Shetti, N.P.; Reddy, K.R.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Graphitic carbon nitride (g–C3N4)-based metal-free photocatalysts for water splitting: A review. Carbon 2019, 149, 693–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fang, X.; Gao, R.; Yang, Y.; Yan, D. A Cocrystal Precursor Strategy for Carbon-Rich Graphitic Carbon Nitride toward High-Efficiency Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. iScience 2019, 16, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ehrmaier, J.; Karsili, T.N.V.; Sobolewski, A.L.; Domcke, W. Mechanism of Photocatalytic Water Splitting with Graphitic Carbon Nitride: Photochemistry of the Heptazine-Water Complex. J. Phys. Chem. A 2017, 121, 4754–4764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Srinivasu, K.; Ghosh, S.K. Photocatalytic splitting of water on s-triazine based graphitic carbon nitride: an ab initio investigation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 23011–23016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pan, Z.; Pan, N.; Chen, L.; He, J.; Zhang, M. Flower-like MOF-derived Co–N-doped carbon composite with remarkable activity and durability for electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019, 44, 30075–30083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Duan, J.; Chen, S.; Zhao, C. Ultrathin metal-organic framework array for efficient electrocatalytic water splitting. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Chen, W.; Pei, J.; He, C.-T.; Wan, J.; Ren, H.; Wang, Y.; Dong, J.; Wu, K.; Cheong, W.-C.; Mao, J.; et al. Single Tungsten Atoms Supported on MOF-Derived N-Doped Carbon for Robust Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, Y.; Peng, Y.-K.; Hu, L.; Zheng, J.; Prabhakaran, D.; Wu, S.; Puchtler, T.J.; Li, M.; Wong, K.-Y.; Taylor, R.A.; et al. Photocatalytic water splitting by N-TiO2 on MgO (111) with exceptional quantum efficiencies at elevated temperatures. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wang, Y.; Zhang, J. Structural engineering of transition metal-based nanostructured electrocatalysts for efficient water splitting. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2018, 12, 838–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cheng, Y.-W.; Dai, J.-H.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Song, Y. Two-Dimensional, Ordered, Double Transition Metal Carbides (MXenes): A New Family of Promising Catalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 28113–28122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Esposito, D.V.; Hunt, S.T.; Kimmel, Y.C.; Chen, J.G. A New Class of Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Production from Water Electrolysis: Metal Monolayers Supported on Low-Cost Transition Metal Carbides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 3025–3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Miao, M.; Pan, J.; He, T.; Yan, Y.; Xia, B.Y.; Wang, X. Molybdenum Carbide-Based Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Chem. Eur. 2017, 23, 10947–10961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Naguib, M.; Mochalin, V.N.; Barsoum, M.W.; Gogotsi, Y. 25th Anniversary Article: MXenes: A New Family of Two-Dimensional Materials. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 992–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Naguib, M.; Mashtalir, O.; Carle, J.; Presser, V.; Lu, J.; Hultman, L.; Gogotsi, Y.; Barsoum, M.W. Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Carbides. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 1322–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Barsoum, M.W. The MN+1AXN phases: A new class of solids: Thermodynamically stable nanolaminates. Prog. Solid State Chem. 2000, 28, 201–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jun, B.-M.; Kim, S.; Heo, J.; Park, C.M.; Her, N.; Jang, M.; Huang, Y.; Han, J.; Yoon, Y. Review of MXenes as new nanomaterials for energy storage/delivery and selected environmental applications. Nano Res. 2019, 12, 471–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Verger, L.; Natu, V.; Carey, M.; Barsoum, M.W. MXenes: An Introduction of Their Synthesis, Select Properties, and Applications. Trends Chem. 2019, 1, 656–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Anasori, B.; Lukatskaya, M.R.; Gogotsi, Y. 2D metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes) for energy storage. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 16098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pang, J.; Mendes, R.G.; Bachmatiuk, A.; Zhao, L.; Ta, H.Q.; Gemming, T.; Liu, H.; Liu, Z.; Rummeli, M.H. Applications of 2D MXenes in energy conversion and storage systems. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 72–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alhabeb, M.; Maleski, K.; Anasori, B.; Lelyukh, P.; Clark, L.; Sin, S.; Gogotsi, Y. Guidelines for Synthesis and Processing of Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide (Ti3C2Tx MXene). Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 7633–7644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Eklund, P.; Beckers, M.; Jansson, U.; Högberg, H.; Hultman, L. The Mn+1AXn phases: Materials science and thin-film processing. Thin Solid Films 2010, 518, 1851–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Anasori, B.; Gogotsi, Y. Introduction to 2D Transition Metal Carbides and Nitrides (MXenes). In 2D Metal Carbides and Nitrides (MXenes): Structure, Properties and Applications; Anasori, B., Gogotsi, Y., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhan, X.; Si, C.; Zhou, J.; Sun, Z. MXene and MXene-based composites: synthesis, properties and environment-related applications. Nanoscale Horiz. 2020, 5, 235–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jiang, X.; Kuklin, A.V.; Baev, A.; Ge, Y.; Ågren, H.; Zhang, H.; Prasad, P.N. Two-dimensional MXenes: From morphological to optical, electric, and magnetic properties and applications. Phys. Rep. 2020, 848, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cheng, L.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Xiang, Q. Two-Dimensional Transition Metal MXene-Based Photocatalysts for Solar Fuel Generation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 3488–3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ye, M.; Wang, X.; Liu, E.; Ye, J.; Wang, D. Boosting the Photocatalytic Activity of P25 for Carbon Dioxide Reduction by using a Surface-Alkalinized Titanium Carbide MXene as Cocatalyst. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 1606–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. An, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, J.; Duan, H.; Shi, J.; Yu, X. The synergetic effects of Ti3C2 MXene and Pt as co-catalysts for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over g-C3N4. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 11405–11411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Li, Y.; Ding, L.; Liang, Z.; Xue, Y.; Cui, H.; Tian, J. Synergetic effect of defects rich MoS2 and Ti3C2 MXene as cocatalysts for enhanced photocatalytic H2 production activity of TiO2. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 383, 123178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, C.; Anasori, B.; Seral-Ascaso, A.; Park, S.-H.; McEvoy, N.; Shmeliov, A.; Duesberg, G.S.; Coleman, J.N.; Gogotsi, Y.; Nicolosi, V. Transparent, Flexible, and Conductive 2D Titanium Carbide (MXene) Films with High Volumetric Capacitance. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1702678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gao, G.; O’Mullane, A.P.; Du, A. 2D MXenes: A New Family of Promising Catalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhu, J.; Ha, E.; Zhao, G.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, D.; Yue, G.; Hu, L.; Sun, N.; Wang, Y.; Lee, L.Y.S.; et al. Recent advance in MXenes: A promising 2D material for catalysis, sensor and chemical adsorption. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 352, 306–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nguyen, T.P.; Tuan Nguyen, D.M.; Tran, D.L.; Le, H.K.; Vo, D.-V.N.; Lam, S.S.; Varma, R.S.; Shokouhimehr, M.; Nguyen, C.C.; Le, Q.V. MXenes: Applications in electrocatalytic, photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction and CO2 reduction. Mol. Catal. 2020, 486, 110850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jiang, Q.; Lei, Y.; Liang, H.; Xi, K.; Xia, C.; Alshareef, H.N. Review of MXene electrochemical microsupercapacitors. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 27, 78–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Su, T.; Hood, Z.D.; Naguib, M.; Bai, L.; Luo, S.; Rouleau, C.M.; Ivanov, I.N.; Ji, H.; Qin, Z.; Wu, Z. Monolayer Ti3C2Tx as an Effective Co-catalyst for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production over TiO2. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 4640–4651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, X.; Chen, C.; Dong, C.-L.; Liu, R.-S.; Han, C.-P.; Li, Y.; Gogotsi, Y.; Wang, G. Single platinum atoms immobilized on an MXene as an efficient catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 985–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yuan, W.; Cheng, L.; An, Y.; Wu, H.; Yao, N.; Fan, X.; Guo, X. MXene Nanofibers as Highly Active Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 8976–8982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, Y.; Ding, L.; Guo, Y.; Liang, Z.; Cui, H.; Tian, J. Boosting the Photocatalytic Ability of g-C3N4 for Hydrogen Production by Ti3C2 MXene Quantum Dots. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 41440–41447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sun, Y.; Jin, D.; Sun, Y.; Meng, X.; Gao, Y.; Dall’Agnese, Y.; Chen, G.; Wang, X.-F. g-C3N4/Ti3C2Tx (MXenes) composite with oxidized surface groups for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 9124–9131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, X.; Ma, Z.; Zhao, X.; Tang, Q.; Zhou, Z. Computational studies on structural and electronic properties of functionalized MXene monolayers and nanotubes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 4960–4966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xie, Y.; Kent, P.R.C. Hybrid density functional study of structural and electronic properties of functionalized Tin+1Xn (X = C, N) monolayers. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 235441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Berdiyorov, G.R. Effect of surface functionalization on the electronic transport properties of Ti3C2 MXene. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 2015, 111, 67002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Berdiyorov, G.R. Optical properties of functionalized Ti3C2T2 (T = F, O, OH) MXene: First-principles calculations. AIP Advances 2016, 6, 055105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Ran, J.; Gao, G.; Li, F.-T.; Ma, T.-Y.; Du, A.; Qiao, S.-Z. Ti3C2 MXene co-catalyst on metal sulfide photo-absorbers for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic hydrogen production. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 13907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Yang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Xiang, Q. Plasma-modified Ti3C2Tx/CdS hybrids with oxygen-containing groups for high-efficiency photocatalytic hydrogen production. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 18797–18805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Xu, F.; Zhang, D.; Liao, Y.; Wang, G.; Shi, X.; Zhang, H.; Xiang, Q. Synthesis and photocatalytic H2-production activity of plasma-treated Ti3C2Tx MXene modified graphitic carbon nitride. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 103, 849–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Miyoshi, A.; Nishioka, S.; Maeda, K. Water Splitting on Rutile TiO2-Based Photocatalysts. Chem. Eur. 2018, 24, 18204–18219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ni, M.; Leung, M.K.H.; Leung, D.Y.C.; Sumathy, K. A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO2 for hydrogen production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2007, 11, 401–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, R.; Weng, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wang, X.; Mi, Y.; Chong, R.; Han, H.; Li, C. Achieving overall water splitting using titanium dioxide-based photocatalysts of different phases. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 2377–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhuang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Meng, X. Fabrication of TiO2 nanofibers/MXene Ti3C2 nanocomposites for photocatalytic H2 evolution by electrostatic self-assembly. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 496, 143647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, X.; Chen, C. Mxene enhanced the photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanorods under visible light. Mater. Lett. 2020, 261, 127127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tso, S.; Li, W.-S.; Wu, B.-H.; Chen, L.-J. Enhanced H2 production in water splitting with CdS-ZnO core-shell nanowires. Nano Energy 2018, 43, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Garg, P.; Bhauriyal, P.; Mahata, A.; Rawat, K.S.; Pathak, B. Role of Dimensionality for Photocatalytic Water Splitting: CdS Nanotube versus Bulk Structure. Chemphyschem 2019, 20, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chen, X.; Shangguan, W. Hydrogen production from water splitting on CdS-based photocatalysts using solar light. Front. Energy 2013, 7, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, L.; Zheng, J.; Jia, S.; Chen, J.; Liu, B.; Zhu, Z. Fabricating efficient CdSe–CdS photocatalyst systems by spatially resetting water splitting sites. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 20131–20135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, M.; Cui, Z.; Li, E. Silver-modified MoS2 nanosheets as a high-efficiency visible-light photocatalyst for water splitting. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 14449–14456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lin, L.; Huang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Du, B.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, C.; Wang, X.; Zhang, N. Construction of CdS/MoS2 heterojunction from core–shell MoS2@Cd-MOF for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 2715–2721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Han, B.; Hu, Y.H. MoS2 as a co-catalyst for photocatalytic hydrogen production from water. Energy Sci. Eng. 2016, 4, 285–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Xiang, Q.; Cheng, F.; Lang, D. Hierarchical Layered WS2/Graphene-Modified CdS Nanorods for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 996–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kumar, R.; Das, D.; Singh, A.K. C2N/WS2 van der Waals type-II heterostructure as a promising water splitting photocatalyst. J. Catal. 2018, 359, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Reddy, D.A.; Park, H.; Ma, R.; Kumar, D.P.; Lim, M.; Kim, T.K. Heterostructured WS2-MoS2 Ultrathin Nanosheets Integrated on CdS Nanorods to Promote Charge Separation and Migration and Improve Solar-Driven Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 1563–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Xiao, R.; Zhao, C.; Zou, Z.; Chen, Z.; Tian, L.; Xu, H.; Tang, H.; Liu, Q.; Lin, Z.; Yang, X. In situ fabrication of 1D CdS nanorod/2D Ti3C2 MXene nanosheet Schottky heterojunction toward enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 268, 118382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tie, L.; Yang, S.; Yu, C.; Chen, H.; Liu, Y.; Dong, S.; Sun, J.; Sun, J. In situ decoration of ZnS nanoparticles with Ti3C2 MXene nanosheets for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 545, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cheng, L.; Chen, Q.; Li, J.; Liu, H. Boosting the photocatalytic activity of CdLa2S4 for hydrogen production using Ti3C2 MXene as a co-catalyst. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 267, 118379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tian, P.; He, X.; Zhao, L.; Li, W.; Fang, W.; Chen, H.; Zhang, F.; Huang, Z.; Wang, H. Ti3C2 nanosheets modified Zr-MOFs with Schottky junction for boosting photocatalytic HER performance. Sol. Energy 2019, 188, 750–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Dong, J.; Shi, Y.; Huang, C.; Wu, Q.; Zeng, T.; Yao, W. A New and stable Mo-Mo2C modified g-C3N4 photocatalyst for efficient visible light photocatalytic H2 production. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 243, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wen, J.; Xie, J.; Chen, X.; Li, X. A review on g-C3N4-based photocatalysts. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 391, 72–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zou, Y.; Ma, D.; Sun, D.; Mao, S.; He, C.; Wang, Z.; Ji, X.; Shi, J.-W. Carbon nanosheet facilitated charge separation and transfer between molybdenum carbide and graphitic carbon nitride toward efficient photocatalytic H2 production. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 473, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Su, T.; Hood, Z.D.; Naguib, M.; Bai, L.; Luo, S.; Rouleau, C.M.; Ivanov, I.N.; Ji, H.; Qin, Z.; Wu, Z. 2D/2D heterojunction of Ti3C2/g-C3N4 nanosheets for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 8138–8149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Lin, P.; Shen, J.; Yu, X.; Liu, Q.; Li, D.; Tang, H. Construction of Ti3C2 MXene/O-doped g-C3N4 2D-2D Schottky-junction for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 24656–24663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tian, P.; He, X.; Zhao, L.; Li, W.; Fang, W.; Chen, H.; Zhang, F.; Huang, Z.; Wang, H. Enhanced charge transfer for efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution over UiO-66-NH2 with annealed Ti3C2Tx MXenes. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019, 44, 788–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Peng, C.; Wei, P.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Cao, Y.; Wang, H.; Yu, H.; Peng, F.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, B.; et al. High efficiency photocatalytic hydrogen production over ternary Cu/TiO2@Ti3C2Tx enabled by low-work-function 2D titanium carbide. Nano Energy 2018, 53, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, Y.; Yang, S.; Liang, Z.; Xue, Y.; Cui, H.; Tian, J. 1T-MoS2 nanopatch/Ti3C2 MXene/TiO2 nanosheet hybrids for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Mater. Chem. Front. 2019, 3, 2673–2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Li, Y.; Ding, L.; Yin, S.; Liang, Z.; Xue, Y.; Wang, X.; Cui, H.; Tian, J. Photocatalytic H2 Evolution on TiO2 Assembled with Ti3C2 MXene and Metallic 1T-WS2 as Co-catalysts. Nano-Micro Lett. 2019, 12, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Yu, M.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Sun, F.; Yang, P.; Qiu, J. A hierarchically porous and hydrophilic 3D nickel–iron/MXene electrode for accelerating oxygen and hydrogen evolution at high current densities. Nano Energy 2019, 63, 103880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, M.; Qin, J.; Rajendran, S.; Zhang, X.; Liu, R. Heterostructured d-Ti3C2/TiO2/g-C3N4 Nanocomposites with Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production Activity. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 4226–4236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Ramalingam, V.; Varadhan, P.; Fu, H.-C.; Kim, H.; Zhang, D.; Chen, S.; Song, L.; Ma, D.; Wang, Y.; Alshareef, H.N.; et al. Heteroatom-Mediated Interactions between Ruthenium Single Atoms and an MXene Support for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1903841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Li, Y.; Yin, Z.; Ji, G.; Liang, Z.; Xue, Y.; Guo, Y.; Tian, J.; Wang, X.; Cui, H. 2D/2D/2D heterojunction of Ti3C2 MXene/MoS2 nanosheets/TiO2 nanosheets with exposed (001) facets toward enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production activity. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 246, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Su, T.; Peng, R.; Hood, Z.D.; Naguib, M.; Ivanov, I.N.; Keum, J.K.; Qin, Z.; Guo, Z.; Wu, Z. One-Step Synthesis of Nb2O5/C/Nb2C (MXene) Composites and Their Use as Photocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 688–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Pan, L.; Mei, H.; Liu, H.; Pan, H.; Zhao, X.; Jin, Z.; Zhu, G. High-efficiency carrier separation heterostructure improve the photocatalytic hydrogen production of sulfide. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 817, 153242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sun, Y.; Sun, Y.; Meng, X.; Gao, Y.; Dall’Agnese, Y.; Chen, G.; Dall’Agnese, C.; Wang, X.-F. Eosin Y-sensitized partially oxidized Ti3C2 MXene for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 310–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g001 550
Figure 1. The schematic diagram is representing the process of synthesizing MXenes from MAX phases. Reproduced with permission from [31]. Copyright Wiley-VCH, 2014 and [32] Copyright American Chemical Society, 2012.
Figure 1. The schematic diagram is representing the process of synthesizing MXenes from MAX phases. Reproduced with permission from [31]. Copyright Wiley-VCH, 2014 and [32] Copyright American Chemical Society, 2012.
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g001
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g002 550
Figure 2. The general applications and properties of MXenes. The center pie chart explored the applications and properties of MXenes. The starting year in the middle pie chart ring indicates the exploration time of each application/property. The outer ring shows the ratio of publications, which were taken from 2011 to 2019 on the Web of Science, with the term of Ti3C2Tx versus the publications deal with all MXene compositions (M2XTx, M3X2Tx, and M4X3Tx). Reproduced with permission from [40]. Copyright Springer Nature, 2019.
Figure 2. The general applications and properties of MXenes. The center pie chart explored the applications and properties of MXenes. The starting year in the middle pie chart ring indicates the exploration time of each application/property. The outer ring shows the ratio of publications, which were taken from 2011 to 2019 on the Web of Science, with the term of Ti3C2Tx versus the publications deal with all MXene compositions (M2XTx, M3X2Tx, and M4X3Tx). Reproduced with permission from [40]. Copyright Springer Nature, 2019.
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g002
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) The schematic diagram representing the process to prepare Ti3C2Tx by using different etchants (HF and in situ HF) and delamination methods and (b–g) their corresponded scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. Reproduced with permission from [37]. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019.
Figure 3. (a) The schematic diagram representing the process to prepare Ti3C2Tx by using different etchants (HF and in situ HF) and delamination methods and (b–g) their corresponded scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. Reproduced with permission from [37]. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019.
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g003
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Monolayer and multilayers Ti3C2Tx as the cocatalysts. Reproduced with permission from reference [52]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2019; (b) the preparation of Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 nanoflowers and their corresponding SEM images. Reproduced with permission from ref. [53]. Copyright Nature Publishing Group, 2018; (c) the preparation of Ti3C2Tx nanofibers and their corresponding SEM, TEM images. Reproduced with permission from ref. [54]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2018; and (d) Schematic diagram for preparing of g–C3N4@Ti3C2Tx quantum dots composites. Reproduced with permission from ref. [55]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2019.
Figure 4. (a) Monolayer and multilayers Ti3C2Tx as the cocatalysts. Reproduced with permission from reference [52]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2019; (b) the preparation of Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 nanoflowers and their corresponding SEM images. Reproduced with permission from ref. [53]. Copyright Nature Publishing Group, 2018; (c) the preparation of Ti3C2Tx nanofibers and their corresponding SEM, TEM images. Reproduced with permission from ref. [54]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2018; and (d) Schematic diagram for preparing of g–C3N4@Ti3C2Tx quantum dots composites. Reproduced with permission from ref. [55]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2019.
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g004
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematic illustration displaying procedure for fabrication of TiO2/Ti3C2Tx composite. Reproduced with permission from reference [67]. Copyright Elsevier B.V., 2019.
Figure 5. Schematic illustration displaying procedure for fabrication of TiO2/Ti3C2Tx composite. Reproduced with permission from reference [67]. Copyright Elsevier B.V., 2019.
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g005
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g006 550
Figure 6. (a,b), TEM and SEM images of Ti3C2Tx/CdS composite structure; (c) the calculated free-energy band diagram of HER with different catalysts including MoS2, WS2, and O-Ti3C2Tx; (d) band diagram of Ti3C2Tx/CdS showing the charge separation and transferring from CdS to Ti3C2Tx for HER; and (e) the proposed mechanism of HER over Ti3C2Tx/CdS composite. Reproduced with permission from reference [61]. Copyright Nature Publishing Group, 2017.
Figure 6. (a,b), TEM and SEM images of Ti3C2Tx/CdS composite structure; (c) the calculated free-energy band diagram of HER with different catalysts including MoS2, WS2, and O-Ti3C2Tx; (d) band diagram of Ti3C2Tx/CdS showing the charge separation and transferring from CdS to Ti3C2Tx for HER; and (e) the proposed mechanism of HER over Ti3C2Tx/CdS composite. Reproduced with permission from reference [61]. Copyright Nature Publishing Group, 2017.
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g006
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g007 550
Figure 7. (a,b)TEM images presented the formation of Ti3C2Tx and Zr-MOFs heterostructure; (c) Hydrogen production rates of Ti3C2Tx/Zr-MOF with different concentrations of Ti3C2Tx; (d) Energy band diagram of Ti3C2Tx/Zr-MOF for photocatalytic HER. Reproduced with permission from reference [82]. Copyright Elsevier B.V., 2019.
Figure 7. (a,b)TEM images presented the formation of Ti3C2Tx and Zr-MOFs heterostructure; (c) Hydrogen production rates of Ti3C2Tx/Zr-MOF with different concentrations of Ti3C2Tx; (d) Energy band diagram of Ti3C2Tx/Zr-MOF for photocatalytic HER. Reproduced with permission from reference [82]. Copyright Elsevier B.V., 2019.
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g007
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Fabrication process of the Ti3C2Tx/O-doped g–C3N4 heterostructure. (b–d) SEM images, TEM images, and EDS spectra of Ti3C2Tx/O-doped g–C3N4. (e) The working mechanism of Ti3C2Tx/O-doped g–C3N4 photocatalyst. Reproduced with permission from reference [87]. Copyright Elsevier B.V., 2019.
Figure 8. (a) Fabrication process of the Ti3C2Tx/O-doped g–C3N4 heterostructure. (b–d) SEM images, TEM images, and EDS spectra of Ti3C2Tx/O-doped g–C3N4. (e) The working mechanism of Ti3C2Tx/O-doped g–C3N4 photocatalyst. Reproduced with permission from reference [87]. Copyright Elsevier B.V., 2019.
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g008
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) Route for the synthesis of Ti3C2Tx/TiO2/UiO-66-NH2 ternary composite, (b) TEM image of the Ti3C2Tx/TiO2/UiO-66-NH2 ternary composite, and (c) working mechanism of ternary composite photocatalyst for HER. Reproduced with permission from reference [88]. Copyright Elsevier B.V., 2019.
Figure 9. (a) Route for the synthesis of Ti3C2Tx/TiO2/UiO-66-NH2 ternary composite, (b) TEM image of the Ti3C2Tx/TiO2/UiO-66-NH2 ternary composite, and (c) working mechanism of ternary composite photocatalyst for HER. Reproduced with permission from reference [88]. Copyright Elsevier B.V., 2019.
Nanomaterials 10 00602 g009
Table
Table 1. Photocatalytic hydrogen production over Ti3C2Tx cocatalysts.
Table 1. Photocatalytic hydrogen production over Ti3C2Tx cocatalysts.
No.PhotocatalystsLight SourceReaction Temp.ScavengerReactant MediumH2 Production Rate (μmol·gcat−1·h−1)Ref/(Year)
1TiO2 nanofibers/ Ti3C2Tx nanosheets (3 wt %)300 W Xe lampRoom temperature (RT)MethanolCH3OH/H2O
(l, 1:9)		6979[67]/2019
2TiO2 nanofibers1831
3Ti3C2Tx nanosheetsND
4F–Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 hybrids350 W Xe arc lampRTGlycerinC3H8O3/H2O
(l, 1:9)		127.1[37]/2019
5OH–Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 hybrids61.4
6CdS (CT0)300 W Xe arc lamp: λ ≥ 420 nm; 80 mW·cm−2RTLactic acidC3H6O3/H2O
(l, 17.6:62.4)		105[61]/2017
7Ti3C2Tx nanoparticlesND
80.05 wt % Ti3C2Tx nanoparticles/CdS (CT0.05)993
90.1 wt % Ti3C2Tx nanoparticles/CdS (CT0.1)1278
102.5 wt % Ti3C2Tx nanoparticles/CdS (CT2.5)14,342
115 wt %Ti3C2Tx nanoparticles/CdS (CT5)3377
12Pt/CdS10,978
13NiS/CdS12,953
14Ni/CdS8649
15MoS2/CdS6183
16Ti3C2Tx nanosheets modified Zr–MOFs (UiO-66-NH2)350 W Xe lampRTS2−/SO32−0.1 M Na2S and 0.1 M Na2SO3204[82]/2019
172 wt % Pt/UiO-66-NH2123
18UiO-66-NH225.6
19Zn2In2S5/Ti3C2Tx hybrids 300 W Xe arc lamp: λ ≥ 420 nm;RTS2−/SO32−0.35 M Na2S and 0.25 M Na2SO32596.8[92]/2019
20Ti3C2Tx/TiO2/UiO-66-NH2 hybrid300 W Xe lamp (PerkinElmer): 350 < λ < 780 nm5 °CS2−/SO32−0.1 M Na2S and 0.1 M Na2SO31980[88]/2019
21Ti3C2Tx/UiO-66-NH21320
22UiO-66-NH2942.9
23MoxS@TiO2@Ti3C2Tx composite300 W Xe arc lamp: an AM1.5 filter; 180 mW·cm−2 within a range of 200–1200 nm.25 °CTriethanolamine (TEOA)TEOA in aqueous acetone10505.8[46]/2020
24Cu/TiO2@Ti3C2Tx300W Xe lamp (CEL-HXF 300E)RTMethanolCH3OH/H2O (l, 1:14)764[89]/ 2018
25TiO2@Ti3C2Tx65
261T–MoS2 nanopatch/Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 nanosheet300 W Xe arc lamp: an AM1.5 filter; 180 mW·cm−2 within a range of 200–1200 nm.25 °CTEOATEOA/Acetone/H2O (l, 1:3:16)9738[90]/2019
27Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 nanosheet898
28TiO2 nanosheet74
291T–WS2@TiO2@ Ti3C2Tx300 W Xe arc lamp: an AM-1.5 filter25 °CTEOATEOA/Acetone/H2O (l, 1:3:16)3409.8[91]/2019
30TiO267.8
31ternary Cu2O/(001) TiO2@Ti3C2Tx300 W Xe lamp (CEL-HXF 300E)RTMethanolCH3OH/H2O (l, 1:14)1496[92]/2019
32(001) TiO2@ Ti3C2Tx165
33Ti3C2Tx@TiO2@MoS2 composites300 W Xe arc lamp (CELHXF300): an AM1.5 filter25 °CTEOATEOA in aqueous acetone6425.3[95]/2019
34Ti3C2Tx@TiO2898.1
35TiO2/Ti3C2Tx/CoS300 W Xe arc lampRTMethanolCH3OH/H2O (l, 1:4)950[95]/2019
36TiO2140
37CoS10
38TiO2/Ti3C2Tx330
39TiO2/CoS540
40g–C3N4/Ti3C2Tx/Pt300 W Xe arc lampRTTEOATEOA/H2O
(l, 1:9)		5100[45]/2018
41g–C3N4/Ti3C2Tx1700
42g–C3N4/Pt1275
43g–C3N4@Ti3C2Tx quantum dots300 W Xe arc lamp (CELHXF300): an AM-1.5 filterRTTEOATEOA/H2O
(l, 3:17)		5111.8[55]/2019
44g–C3N4196.8
45Pt/g–C3N41896.4
46Ti3C2Tx/O-doped g–C3N4300 W Xe lampRTTEOATEOA (l)25,124[87]/2019
47O-doped g–C3N413,745
48Ti3C2Tx/g–C3N415,573
49Ti3C2Tx/TiO2/g–C3N4 nanocomposites300 W Xe lamp: λ > 420 nm25 °CTEOATEOA/H2O
(l, 2:17)		1620[93]/2018
50g–C3N4670
51CdLa2S4/Ti3C2Tx nanocomposite300 W Xe lamp: a high-pass filter (λ > 420 nm)RTS2−/SO32−0.35 M Na2S and 0.25 M Na2SO311,182.4[81]/2019
52Pt/CdLa2S41734.7
53CdLa2S4832
54Ti3C2TxND
55CdS nanorod/ Ti3C2Tx nanosheet300 W Xe lamp (PerkinElmer): a cut-off filter (λ > 420 nm)6 °CLactic acidC3H6O3/H2O (l, 1:9)2407[79]/2019
56CdS nanorod360
57ZnS nanoparticles/Ti3C2Tx nanosheets300 W Xe lampRTLactic acidC3H6O3/H2O (l, 1:4)502.6[80]/2019
58ZnS nanoparticles124.6
59ZnO nanorods /Ti3C2Tx hybrids300 W Xe lamp: λ > 420 nmRTEthanolC2H5OH/H2O (l, 3:16)456[68]/2020
60ZnO nanorodsND
61CdS/MoS2/Ti3C2Tx composites300 W Xe lamp (CELHXF300): a cut-off filter (λ > 420 nm)RTS2−/SO32−0.25 M Na2S and 0.35 M Na2SO39679[94]/2019
62plasma-Ti3C2Tx/CdS hybrids300 W arc Xe lamp (PLSSXE300): a UV cut-off filter (λ > 420 nm);RTLactic acidC3H6O3/H2O (l, 1:9)825[62]/2019
63Ti3C2Tx/CdS hybrids473
64g–C3N4/plasma-Ti3C2Tx350 W Xe lamp: a UV cut-off filter (λ > 400 nm); 70 mW·cm−2RTTEOATEOA/H2O
(l, 1:9)		17.8[63]/2020
65g–C3N4/Ti3C2Tx7.5
66g–C3N40.7
67TiO2/Ti3C2Tx@AC-48 h composite350 W Xe lamp (AHD 350): a cut-off filter (λ > 400 nm)RTAscorbic acid (AA)29 mg·mL−1 AA with the sensitization of 1 mM EY in aqueous solution33.4[98]/2019
681% Pt/TiO2 0.7
69TiO2/Ti3C2Tx@AC-48 h composite29 mg·mL−1 AA in aqueous solution0.3
Table
Table 2. Photocatalytic hydrogen production over selected MXenes cocatalysts.
Table 2. Photocatalytic hydrogen production over selected MXenes cocatalysts.
No.PhotocatalystsLight SourceReaction Temp.ScavengerReactant MediumH2 Production Rate (μmol·gcat−1·h−1)Ref./(Year)
1Ti3C2Tx/O-doped g–C3N4300 W Xe lampRTTEOATEOA (l)25,124[87]/2019
2CdLa2S4/Ti3C2Tx nanocomposite300 W Xe lamp: a high-pass filter (λ > 420 nm)RTS2−/SO32−0.35 M Na2S and 0.25 M Na2SO311,182.4[81]/2019
32.5 wt % Ti3C2Tx nanoparticles/CdS (CT2.5)300 W Xe arc lamp: λ ≥ 420 nm; 80 mW·cm−2RTLactic acidC3H6O3/H2O (l, 17.6:62.4)14,342[61]/2017
4Nb2O5/C/Nb2CTx Composites200 W Hg lamp: λ = 285–325 nm; 120 mW·cm−225 °CMethanolCH3OH/H2O (l, 1:3)7.81[96]/2018
5Zn0.5Cd0.5S/Ti2C/TiO2300 W Xe lamp: λ ≥ 400 nm;RTS2−/SO32−0.3 M Na2S and 0.3 M Na2SO332,560[97]/2020

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, V.-H.; Nguyen, B.-S.; Hu, C.; Nguyen, C.C.; Nguyen, D.L.T.; Nguyen Dinh, M.T.; Vo, D.-V.N.; Trinh, Q.T.; Shokouhimehr, M.; Hasani, A.; et al. Novel Architecture Titanium Carbide (Ti3C2Tx) MXene Cocatalysts toward Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production: A Mini-Review. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10040602

AMA Style

Nguyen V-H, Nguyen B-S, Hu C, Nguyen CC, Nguyen DLT, Nguyen Dinh MT, Vo D-VN, Trinh QT, Shokouhimehr M, Hasani A, et al. Novel Architecture Titanium Carbide (Ti3C2Tx) MXene Cocatalysts toward Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production: A Mini-Review. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(4):602. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10040602

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Van-Huy, Ba-Son Nguyen, Chechia Hu, Chinh Chien Nguyen, Dang Le Tri Nguyen, Minh Tuan Nguyen Dinh, Dai-Viet N. Vo, Quang Thang Trinh, Mohammadreza Shokouhimehr, Amirhossein Hasani, and et al. 2020. "Novel Architecture Titanium Carbide (Ti3C2Tx) MXene Cocatalysts toward Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production: A Mini-Review" Nanomaterials 10, no. 4: 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10040602

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop