Next Article in Journal
Use of a Novel Polymer-Coated Steel as an Alternative to Traditional Can Manufacturing in the Food Industry
Previous Article in Journal
Eco-Friendly, High-Density Fiberboards Bonded with Urea-Formaldehyde and Ammonium Lignosulfonate
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/polym13020221
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multifunctional Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane (POSS) Based Hybrid Porous Materials for CO2 Uptake and Iodine Adsorption

by
Mohamed Gamal Mohamed
1,2,
Mei-Yin Tsai
1,
Chih-Feng Wang
3,
Chih-Feng Huang
4,
Martin Danko
5,
Lizong Dai
6,
Tao Chen
7 and
Shiao-Wei Kuo
1,8,*
1
Department of Materials and Optoelectronic Science, Center of Crystal Research, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
2
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut 71516, Egypt
3
Advanced Membrane Materials Research Center, Graduate Institute of Applied Science and Technology, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
4
Department of Chemical Engineering, i-Center for Advanced Science and Technology (iCAST), National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
5
Department of Synthesis and Characterization of Polymers, Polymer Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 84541 Bratislava, Slovakia
6
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Fire Retardant Materials, College of Materials, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
7
Ningbo Institute of Material Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Science, Ningbo 315201, China
8
Department of Medicinal and Applied Chemistry, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(2), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020221
Submission received: 16 December 2020 / Revised: 4 January 2021 / Accepted: 5 January 2021 / Published: 10 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organic Nanocomposites and Their Applications in Polymeric Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, two different types of hybrid porous organic polymers (POPs), polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane tetraphenylpyrazine (POSS-TPP) and tetraphenylethene (POSS-TPE), were successfully synthesized through the Friedel−Crafts polymerization of tetraphenylpyrazine (TPP) and tetraphenylethene (TPE), respectively, with octavinylsilsesquioxane (OVS) as node building blocks, in the presence of anhydrous FeCl3 as a catalyst and 1,2-dichloroethane at 60 °C. Based on N2 adsorption and thermogravimetric analyses, the resulting hybrid porous materials displayed high surface areas (270 m2/g for POSS-TPP and 741 m2/g for POSS-TPE) and outstanding thermal stabilities. Furthermore, as-prepared POSS-TPP exhibited a high carbon dioxide capacity (1.63 mmol/g at 298 K and 2.88 mmol/g at 273 K) with an excellent high adsorption capacity for iodine, reaching up to 363 mg/g, compared with the POSS-TPE (309 mg/g).

1. Introduction

The preparation of porous organic polymers (POPs) has become a hot topic in the academic and industry fields due to their interesting features, such as high physicochemical stability, porous character, low density, facile preparation, low regeneration energy, and good thermal and chemical stabilities [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Porous organic polymers have been applied in different applications such as light harvesting, chemical sensors, catalysis, iodine uptake, H2 production from water, water treatment, optoelectronic devices, carbon dioxide reduction, nanofiltration, enantioseparation, energy storage, gas separation, and adsorption [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. The synthesis of POPs was successfully achieved using various synthetic methods, including Friedel–Crafts arylation, Schiff base reactions, Suzuki reactions, Yamamoto reactions, Heck reactions, and Sonogashira reactions [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. In addition, POPs can be classified into different kinds of materials, such as covalent organic frameworks (COFs), conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs), hypercrosslinked polymers (HCPs), covalent triazine-based frameworks (CTFs), metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), and polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs) [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52].
Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSSs) are a kind of nanostructured compound with a diameter in the range of 1–3 nm, an empirical formula (R8Si8O12), a well-defined structure, and a controlled porosity [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61]. Recently, using an inorganic POSS as a building block for preparation, hybrid porous materials have attracted much attention because of their excellent thermal and mechanical proprieties, water retardance, and chemical stability [62,63,64,65,66]. As reported, hydrosilylation, Heck, Friedel–Crafts, Yamamoto, and Sonogashira reactions could be used for the preparation of POSS porous materials [67,68]. For example, Liu et al. successfully prepared a porous polymer (Fc-HPP) through the Friedel–Crafts reaction of ferrocene (Fc) with OVS. These materials displayed a high surface area (1015 m2/g) and excellent performance for removing heavy metals and dyes [66]. Liu et al. also prepared a series of porous polymers derived from OVS with various ethene derivates through the heck coupling reaction [67]. The same group also used a Friedel–Crafts reaction to prepare multifunctional hybrid porous materials from OVS and tetraphenylene for metal ion detection and dye adsoprtion. They revealed that these materials possess dual pore structures with a high surface area (up to 1910 m2/g) [65].
In this work, we designed, synthesized, and applied in CO2 and I2 the capture of two different types of hybrid porous organic polymers (POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE) derived from the Friedel−Crafts polymerization of tetraphenylpyrazine (TPP) and tetraphenylethene (TPE), respectively, with octavinylsilsesquioxane (OVS) as node building blocks in the presence of anhydrous FeCl3 as a catalyst and 1,2-dichloroethane at 60 °C. Various instruments, such as Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), solid state 13C cross-polarization/magic-angle spinning (CP/MAS), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), Brunauer–Emmet–Teller theory (BET), XRD, TEM, and SEM were used to examine the chemical structures, morphology, crystallinity, and porous properties for POSS-TTP and POSS-TPE, respectively. The results revealed that the as-prepared POSS-TPP exhibited a high carbon dioxide capacity (1.63 mmol/g at 298 K and 2.88 mmol/g at 273 K) with an excellent and high adsorption capacity for iodine, reaching to up to 363 mg/g.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Octavinylsilsesquioxane (OVS, 98%), benzophenone (99%), anhydrous ferric chloride (FeCl3, 99.99%), 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE, 99.8%), anhydrous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4, 99.5%), ammonium acetate (CH3COONH4, 98%), acetic acid (CH3COOH, 99%), potassium carbonate (K2CO3, 99.995%), and benzoin (98%) were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Heysham, United Kingdom). Tetrahydrofuran (THF), acetone, methanol (CH3OH), and dichloromethane (DCM) were ordered from Aldrich (Taipei, Taiwan).

2.2. Synthesis of Tetraphenylpyrazine (TPP)

TPP was synthesized as reported in the previous study with a minor modification [69]. Benzoin (2.12 g, 10 mmol), acetic anhydride (1.45 mL, 15 mmol), ammonium acetate (2.32 g, 30 mmol), and 50 mL of acetic acid were added to a 50 mL round-bottom flask. After refluxing for 3.5 h at 90 °C, the mixture was cooled down to room temperature and then filtered. The crude products were purified with recrystallization in acetic acid to afford TPP as a white powder (yield: 34%) (1H NMR (500 MHz, δ, ppm, CDCl3, Figure S1): 7.65 (m, 8H), 7.33 (m, 12H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, δ, ppm, CDCl3, Figure S2): 148.5, 138.5, 129.9, 128.7, 128.3).

2.3. Synthesis of Tetraphenyethene (TPE)

TPE was prepared according to our previous study [7,13]. Benzophenone (3.00 g, 16.20 mmol), zinc (3.91 g, 59.4 mmol), and dry THF (100 mL) were stirred and kept at 0 °C for 30 min. Then, TiCl4 (3.29 mL, 29.4 mmol) was added slowly to the reaction mixture at 0 °C, and the reaction solution was refluxed at 80 °C for 18 h. After that, a 10% aqueous solution of K2CO3 was added dropwise to the reaction mixture at room temperature. The reaction mixture was extracted with ethylacetate (EA), dried over MgSO4 and filtered, and the THF solution was removed to yield TPE as a white crystalline solid (yield: 97%) (1H-NMR (500 MHz, δ, ppm, CDCl3, Figure S3): 7.05–7.15 (m, 20H); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, δ, ppm, CDCl3, Figure S4): 140.7, 141.0, 131.3, 127.7, 126.4).

2.4. Synthesis of POSS-TPP

A solution of OVS (0.63 g, 1 mmol), tetraphenylpyrazine (0.32 g, 0.8 mmol), and FeCl3 (0.9 g, 6.7 mmol) in dry 1,2-dichloroethane (20 mL) was prepared. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 0.5 h and then heated under reflux at 60 °C for 24 h. After cooling at room temperature, the solid was filtered and washed three times with THF, methanol, chloroform, and acetone to remove the unreacted monomer and FeCl3. Then, it was dried under a vacuum at 80 °C to get a red-brown solid (0.55 g, 87%).

2.5. Synthesis of POSS-TPE

A solution of OVS (0.63 g, 1 mmol), TPE (0.28 g, 0.8 mmol), and FeCl3 (0.9 g, 6.7 mmol) in 1,2-dry dichloroethane (20 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 0.5 h and then heated under reflux at 60 °C for 24 h. After cooling at room temperature, the solid was filtered and washed three times with THF, methanol, chloroform, and acetone to remove the unreacted monomer and FeCl3. It was then dried under a vacuum at 80 °C to get a red-brown solid (0.59 g, 93%).

2.6. Uptake of Iodine

The procedure of iodine uptake by both porous materials (POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE) was carried out as follows: POSS-TPP or POSS-TPE (5 mg) was suspended in 10 mL of an I2 solution in hexane. The solution mixture was stirred at different times, and then the UV-Vis measurement was done. The calibration curve of the I2 solution was recorded by using various iodine concentrations.

3. Results

3.1. Synthesis of POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE

The preparation route of the TPP and TPE monomers is shown in Scheme 1. The TPP monomer was successfully synthesized by the reaction of benzoin with ammonium acetate (CH3COONH4) in the presence of acetic acid at 90 °C. The TPE monomer was prepared by the reaction of benzophenone with zinc in dry THF as a solvent and the presence of TiCl4 at 80 °C under an N2 atmosphere. While the schematic method for the preparation of two different hybrid microporous polymers (POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE) was based on OVS, TPP and TPE are shown in Scheme 2. Firstly, POSS-TPP was prepared by a Friedel–Crafts reaction of OVS with TPP in the presence of anhydrous FeCl3 as a catalyst and 1,2-dichloroethane as solvent at 60 °C for 24 h in an N2 atmosphere (Scheme 2A), while POSS-TPE was synthesized by a Friedel–Crafts reaction of OVS with TPE in the presence of anhydrous FeCl3 as a catalyst and 1,2-dichloroethane as a solvent at 60 °C for 24 h under an N2 atmosphere (Scheme 2B). The resulting materials were successively washed several times with dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethylacetamide (DMAc), THF, DCM, and MeOH to remove FeCl3 and unreacted OVS, as well as other monomers. In addition, the POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE were not soluble in acetone, THF, DMF, DCM, or MeOH. Figure 1 shows the 1H-NMR spectra of TPP and TPE with CDCl3 as the solvent. The proton signals were located at 7.64 ppm and 7.35 ppm for the aromatic rings in the TPP (Figure 1A). The 1H-NMR spectrum (Figure 1B) of TPE showed a characteristic proton signal centered at 8.04–7.04 ppm for the aromatic proton signals. Furthermore, we used 13C-NMR measurements to confirm the chemical structures of the TPP and TPE, as displayed in Figure 1. As shown in Figure 1C,D, the signals of the aromatic carbon nuclei in the TPP and TPE moieties appeared in the range of 149.64–129.29 ppm for the TPP and 141.06–126.40 ppm for the TPE.
In addition, FTIR analyses were used to investigate the functional groups in OVS, TPP, TPE, POSS-TPP, and POSS-TPE, respectively (Figure 2). The absorption bands of Si–O–Si, C=C–H, and C=C in the OVS (Figure 2A) were located at 1107 cm−1, 1600 cm−1, and 3066 cm−1, respectively. The FTIR spectra of TPP, TPE, POSS-TPP, and POSS-TPE displayed a characteristic absorption band in the range of 3048–3052 cm−1 for the stretching C–H aromatic groups and at 1599 cm−1 for the C=C bonds (Figure 2B–E). In addition, the absorption signals appeared at 3450 cm−1, 2950 cm−1, and 1457 cm−1 in the FTIR spectra of POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE (Figure 2D,E), representing adsorbed water by our porous materials and the presence of CH2-CH2 linkage in both the POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE polymer frameworks.
The chemical structures of POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE were confirmed through the solid-state 13C CP/MAS analyses (Figure 3). The solid-state 13C CP/MAS profiles (Figure 3) of POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE features carbon nuclei signals in the range 138.11–129.77 ppm and 41.08–20.80 pm for POSS-TPP (Figure 3A) which corresponds to aromatic ring in POSS-TPP, unreacted vinyl carbons, and Si–CH2–CH2-TPP or Si–CH(CH3)-TPP units, respectively. While the signals appearing in the range 140.94–129.17 and 39.96–15.17 pm for POSS-TPE (Figure 3B) arising from TPE units, unreacted vinyl carbons and Si–CH2–CH2-TPE or Si–CH(CH3)-TPE units, respectively.
The solid state 29Si MAS NMR measurement was done to confirm the presence of POSS moiety in both POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE, as presented in Figure 4. In the displayed solid state 29Si MAS NMR spectra of POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE, two major signals at −66.95 ppm and −78.66 ppm were attributed to the silicon atom of CSi(OSi)3 (T3) from the SiCH2 CH2TPP, Si¬CH(CH3) TPP units and the unreacted SiCH=CH2 group, respectively, and for POSS-TPP and the silicon atom of CSi(OSi)3 (T3) from the SiCH2CH2TPE, SiCH(CH3) TPE units and unreacted SiCH=CH2 group, respectively. In addition, the disappearance of signals arising from the T1 or T2 units (Tn = CSi (OSi)n(OH)3−n) indicated both the remaining structure and the lack of cleavage of the cage structure in the POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE hybrid polymers.

3.2. Thermal Stability and Porosity Properties of POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE

The thermal stabilities of OVS, TPP, TPE, POSS-TPP, and POSS-TPE were studied using TGA analysis under an N2 atmosphere, as shown in Figure 5. As displayed in Figure 5, the degradation temperatures (Td5 and Td10) and char yields were 242 °C, 255 °C, and 3.6% for OVS; 296 °C, 312 °C, and 0% for TPP; 246 °C, 263 °C, and 0% for TPE; 267 °C, 398 °C, and 71% for POSS-TPP; and 378 °C, 475 °C, and 73% for POSS-TPE, respectively. Interestingly, both POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE hybrid polymers displayed high thermal stabilities compared with their corresponding monomers, which was attributed to the introduction of POSS units, which enhanced the highly crosslinked network in the system, preventing the rapid degradation of hybrid polymers and also increasing the cleavage degradation of organic groups in the POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE. The values of Td5 and Td10 and the char yield for the OVS, TPP, TPE, and their corresponding polymers are summarized in Table 1.
The wide-angle powder X-ray diffraction (WAXD) patterns of POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE (Figure 6) showed a broad peak at 2θ ≈ 22°, indicating that both of these two porous materials possessed amorphous characteristics, with no long-range order compared with the highly crystalline of TPE and OVS. These results displayed the random cross-linking between the TPP and TPE molecules with POSS cage structures [70,71].
Nitrogen adsorption–desorption experiments at 77 K were measured to examine the porosity parameters for our new POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE (Figure 7). Both of the nitrogen adsorption–desorption profiles of POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE (Figure 7A,B) revealed a rapid N2 uptake at a low P/P0 pressure that continued to increase at a high P/P0 pressure, indicating the coexistence of mesopores and micropores in the hybrid polymer network. Based on the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) classification for BET curves, both POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE featured type IV adsorption isotherms. In addition, there were the hysteresis loops in both curves which also confirmed the presence of micropores and mesopores in the polymer framework. The Brunauer–Emmet–Teller (BET) surface area and total pore volume of the POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE were calculated to be 270 m2/g and 0.22 cm3/g, respectively, for POSS-TPP and 741 m2/g, 0.58 cm3/g, respectively, for POSS-TPE. The pore size distributions of POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE were calculated by using non-local density functional theory (NL-DFT), as elucidated in Figure 7C,D. The pore size diameters of the POSS-TPP were 1.04 nm and 1.82 nm (Figure 7C), while the POSS-TPE featured pore size diameters at 1.08 nm and 2.09 nm (Figure 7D). The porosity parameters of the POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE are provided in Table 1. In addition, TEM images (Figure 7E,F and Figure S5) of the POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE featured a microporous structure with no long-range order. The TEM results were consistent with the XRD pattern (Figure 6).

3.3. CO2 Capture and Iodine (I2) Adsorption Performance

We applied POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE for CO2 capture and iodine adsorption due to their high total pore volumes, BET surface areas, and the presence of mesoporous and microporous structures in the polymer networks. We performed CO2 uptake measurements for POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE at 298 K and 273 K to examine their CO2 uptake abilities, as presented in Figure 8. The results revealed that POSS-TPP displayed the highest CO2 adsorption capacity, reaching 1.63 mmol/g at 298 K and 2.88 mmol/g at 273 K, while POSS-TPE showed CO2 capture values reaching 0.99 mmol/g at 298 K and 1.97 mmol/g at 273 K. As previously reported, the enhancement of polymeric porous materials for the adsoprtion of acidic CO2 gas can be achieved through the incorporation of basic nitrogen functionalities and oxygen groups into the polymeric network. Interestingly, even POSS-TPP possesses a low BET surface area (270 m2/g) compared with the POSS-TPE. POSS-TPP displayed a higher CO2 uptake than that other porous materials, such as poly(1,1-dimethyl-3,4-diphenyl-2,5-bis(4’,4’-diphenylaminophenyl)) silole (PDMTPAS), (1.02 mmol/g at 298 K), An-CPOP-1 (1.30 mmol at 298 K and 1.40 mmol/g at 273 K), An-CPOP-2 (1.40 mmol/g at 298 K and 1.52 mmol/g at 273 K), and C2M1-Al (1.44 mmol/g at 273 K) [5,72,73], due to the POSS-TPP containing N-atoms, which can lead to effectively increasing the dipole–quadrupole interactions between the CO2 molecules and the POSS-TPP. The CO2 adsoprtion capacity performance of POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE, compared with other porous materials, is provided in Table S1.
The developing porous polymer absorbents featuring good porosities and unique structures to decrease environmental pollution, such as I2, have attracted much intention in both academics and industry [19]. As reported by different groups, the performance of the porous organic polymers as adsorbents for iodine uptake strongly depends on the interaction of the iodine molecule with the polymer framework and does not depend on the pore size or volume of the polymer network [19]. Figure 9A,B presents the UV absorbance spectra of the suspension solutions of the POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE in ethanol with an I2 solution (10−4 M) at different interval times (0 h to 24 h). As shown in Figure 9A,B, the maximum intensity of the adsorption peak of I2 was detected at λmax = 523 nm. After the addition of 5 mg of POSS-TPP or POSS-TPE into the iodine solution in hexane, the intensity of the absorption bands of the I2 gradually decreased when the time increased from 0 to 24 h. These results suggest that both POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE could act as good precursors for I2 adsoprtion. The calibration curve (Figure 9C) of the iodine was measured through the recording of UV-Vis spectra of different I2 concentrations in hexane. We observed that the maximum adsorption capability value (Figure 9D) of the POSS-TPP (363 mg/g) was higher than that of POSS-TPP (309 mg/g). From the adsoprtion experiments, the POSS-TPP was considered a better adsorbent material for iodine than POSS-TPE due to the presence of N-atoms in the POSS-TPP framework, leading to strong interaction with the I2 molecules. POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE showed excellent iodine uptake performance compared with other POP adsorbents, as presented in Table S2. In addition, the synthesis of hybrid porous organic polymers based on the POSS unit through a simple Friedel–Crafts reaction with large-scale applications was considered as an effective synthetic method [36]. For recycling experiments, the iodine-loaded POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE samples were washed with ethanol to remove the I2 molecules and dried at 100 °C. As shown in Figure S6, after recycling the measurements six times, the iodine capture capacities of the POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE were found to drop from 363 mg/g to 362 mg/g and 309 mg/g to 308 mg/g, respectively. From these results, our new adsorbent materials were used as good precursors for reversible and recyclable iodine uptake.

4. Conclusions

In summary, two different kinds of hybrid porous materials (POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE) were easily synthesized via simple Friedel−Crafts polymerization of cubic octavinylsilsesquioxane as node building blocks with tetraphenylpyrazine and tetraphenylethene, respectively, in the presence of FeCl3 as a catalyst. The synthesized POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE hybrid porous polymers exhibited high surface areas of 270 m2/g and 741 m2/g, respectively, with mesoporous structures. In addition, the POSS-TPP displayed the highest CO2 adsorption capacity, reaching 1.63 mmol/g at 298 K and 2.88 mmol/g at 273 K, with a maximum adsorption capacity for I2 reaching 363 mg/g, compared with the POSS-TPE and other porous materials.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/2/221/s1. Figure S1: 1H NMR spectrum of TPP. Figure S2: 13C NMR spectrum of TPP. Figure S3: 1H NMR spectrum of TPE. Figure S4: 13C NMR spectrum of TPE. Figure S5: TEM images of POSS-TPP (A,B,C) and POSS-TPE (D,E,F). Figure S6: Repeated I2 uptake experiments for (A) POSS-TPP and (B) POSS-TPE. Table S1: Performance data of POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE compared with those of other previously porous materials. Table S2: Iodine uptake properties of POSS-TPP, POSS-TPE and other porous materials.

Author Contributions

M.G.M. and M.-Y.T. did the experiment, C.-F.W., C.-F.H., T.C., and M.D. helped to design the reaction, L.D. helped to design the POSS composite, and S.-W.K. contributed to the literature review and to the writing of this paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under contracts MOST109-2221-E-110 -067 -MY3 and MOST 109-2923-E-110 -001 -MY3, This work was also supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51773214) and by SAS-MOST Joint Research Project “Tough-VigNet SAS-MOST JRP 2019/07". We also thank Hsien-Tsan Lin of the Regional Instruments Center at National Sun Yat-Sen University for help with the TEM measurement.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lv, H.; Wang, W.; Li, F. Porous organic polymers with built-in N-heterocyclic carbenes: Selective and efficient heterogeneous catalyst for the reductive N-formylation of amines with CO2. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 16588–16594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aly, K.I.; Sayed, M.M.; Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W.; Younis, O. A facile synthetic route and dual function of network luminescent porous polyester and copolyester containing porphyrin moiety for metal ions sensor and dyes adsorption. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2020, 298, 110063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mohamed, M.G.; Atayde, E.C., Jr.; Matsagar, B.M.; Na, J.; Yamauchi, Y.; Wu, K.C.W.; Kuo, S.W. Construction Hierarchically Mesoporous/Microporous Materials Based on Block Copolymer and Covalent Organic Framework. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2020, 122, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jansen, J.C.; Esposito, E.; Fuoco, A.; Carta, M. Microporous Organic Polymers: Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications. Polymers 2019, 11, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Mohamed, M.G.; Zhang, X.; Mansoure, T.H.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Huang, C.F.; Danko, M.; Xin, Z.; Kuo, S.W. Hypercrosslinked porous organic polymers based on tetraphenylanthraquinone for CO2 uptake and high-performance supercapacitor. Polymer 2020, 205, 122857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, T.X.; Liang, H.P.; Anito, D.A.; Ding, X.; Han, B.H. Emerging applications of porous organic polymers in visible-light photocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 7003–7034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mohamed, M.G.; Liu, N.Y.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Kuo, S.W. Ultrastable luminescent hybrid microporous polymers based on polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane for CO2 uptake and metal ion sensing. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2021, 311, 110695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cooper, A.I. Conjugated Microporous Polymers. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1291–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Y.; Fan, X.; Jia, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Q. Preparation of Magnetic Hyper-Cross-Linked Polymers for the Efficient Removal of Antibiotics from Water. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, H.; Liu, H. Pyrene-functionalized silsesquioxane as fluorescent nanoporous material for antibiotics detection and removal. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2020, 300, 110135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Byun, Y.; Je, S.H.; Talapanani, S.N.; Coskun, A. Advances in Porous Organic Polymers for Efficient Water Capture. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 10262–10283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Mohamed, M.G.; Tsai, M.Y.; Su, W.C.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Wang, C.F.; Huang, C.F.; Dai, L.; Chen, T.; Kuo, S.W. Nitrogen-Doped microporous carbons derived from azobenzene and nitrile-functionalized polybenzoxazines for CO2 uptake. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 24, 101111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mohamed, M.G.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Meng, T.S.; Samy, M.M.; Kuo, S.W. Multifunctional Hypercrosslinked Porous Organic Polymers Based on Tetraphenylethene and Triphenylamine Derivatives for High-Performance Dye Adsorption and Supercapacitor. Polymers 2020, 12, 2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cousins, K.; Zhang, R. Highly Porous Organic Polymers for Hydrogen Fuel Storage. Polymers 2019, 11, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Cui, Y.; Du, J.; Liu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Wang, S.; Pang, H.; Liang, Z.; Yu, J. Design and synthesis of multifunctional porous N-rich polymer containing s-triazine and Tröger’s base for CO2 adsorption, catalysis and sensing. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 2643–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. McKeown, N.B.; Budd, P.M.; Book, D. Microporous polymers as potential hydrogen storage materials. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007, 28, 995–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, J.G.; Lee, P.Y.; Ahmed, M.M.M.; Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W. Varying the Hydrogen Bonding Strength in Phenolic/PEO-b-PLA Blends Provides Mesoporous Carbons Having Large Accessible Pores Suitable for Energy Storage. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2020, 221, 2000040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Furukawa, H.; Yaghi, O.M. Storage of hydrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide in highly porous covalent organic frameworks for clean energy applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8875–8883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Ye, Y.; Meng, X.; Du, J.; Song, X.; Liang, Z. Ultrahigh volatile iodine capture by conjugated microporous polymer based on N,N,N’,N’-tetraphenyl-1,4-phenylenediamine. Polym. Chem. 2019, 10, 2608–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mohamed, M.G.; Hung, W.S.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Ahmed, M.M.M.; Dai, L.; Chen, T.; Kuo, S.W. High-Molecular-Weight PLA-b-PEO-b-PLA Triblock Copolymer Templated Large Mesoporous Carbons for Supercapacitors and CO2 Capture. Polymers 2020, 12, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, W.T.; Zhuang, Y.T.; Wang, J.Y.; Yang, T.; Yu, Y.L.; Chen, M.L.; Wang, J.H. A three-dimensional porous organic framework for highly selective capture of mercury and copper ions. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2019, 1, 2797–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mohamed, M.G.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Takashi, Y.; Kuo, S.W. Ultrastable conductive microporous covalent triazine frameworks based on pyrene moieties provide high-performance CO2 uptake and supercapacitance. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 8241–8253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tan, Z.; Su, H.; Guo, Y.; Liu, H.; Liao, B.; Amin, A.M.; Liu, Q. Ferrocene-Based Conjugated Microporous Polymers Derived from Yamamoto Coupling for Gas Storage and Dye Removal. Polymers 2020, 12, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Feizi, F.; Shamsipur, M.; Gholivand, M.B.; Taherpour, A.A.; Barati, A.; Shamsipur, H.; Mohajerani, E.; Budd, P. Harnessing the enantiomeric recognition ability of hydrophobic polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1) toward amino acids by converting them into hydrophilic polymer dots. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 13827–13835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mohamed, M.G.; Ebrahium, S.M.; Hammam, A.S.; Kuo, S.W.; Aly, K.I. Enhanced CO2 capture in nitrogen-enriched microporous carbons derived from Polybenzoxazines containing azobenzene and carboxylic acid units. J. Polym. Res. 2020, 27, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Samy, M.M.; Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W. Pyrene-functionalized tetraphenylethylene polybenzoxazine for dispersing single-walled carbon nanotubes and energy storage. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2020, 199, 108360. [Google Scholar]
  27. EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Elewa, A.M.; Huang, S.W.; Chou, H.H.; Kuo, S.W. Dual-Function Fluorescent Covalent Organic Frameworks: HCl Sensing and Photocatalytic H2 Evolution from Water. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 8, 2000641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Lai, M.Y.; Kuo, S.W. Highly fluorescent covalent organic framework as hydrogen chloride sensor: Roles of Schiff base bonding and π-stacking. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 9520–9528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abdulhamid, M.A.; Park, S.H.; Vovusha, H.; Akhtar, F.H.; Ng, K.C.; Schwingenschlögl, U.; Szekely, G. Molecular engineering of high-performance nanofiltration membranes from intrinsically microporous poly(ether-ether-ketone). J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 24445–24454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, W.; Mu, X.; He, X.; Chen, P.; Zhao, S.; Huang, C. Robust porous polymers bearing phosphine oxide/chalcogenide ligands for volatile iodine capture. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 379, 122365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Mohamed, M.G.; Mansoure, T.H.; Yu, H.H.; Chen, T.; Kuo, S.W. Ultrastable tetraphenyl-p-phenylenediamine-based covalent organic frameworks as platforms for high-performance electrochemical supercapacitors. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 14890–14893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zou, X.; Ren, H.; Zhu, G. Topology-directed design of porous organic frameworks and their advanced applications. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 3925–3936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Ben, T.; Ren, H.; Ma, S.; Cao, D.; Lan, J.; Jing, X.; Wang, W.; Xu, J.; Deng, F.; Simmons, J.M.; et al. Targeted synthesis of a porous aromatic framework with high stability and exceptionally high surface area. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9457–9460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yuan, D.; Lu, W.; Zhao, D.; Zhou, H.C. Highly stable porous polymer networks with exceptionally high gas-uptake capacities. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3723–3725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ding, L.; Gao, H.; Xie, F.; Li, W.; Bai, H.; Li, L. Porosity-Enhanced polymers from hyper-cross-linked polymer precursors. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 956–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, D.; Fu, Y.; Yu, W.; Yu, G.; Pan, C. Versatile Adamantane-based porous polymers with enhanced microporosity for efficient CO2 capture and iodine removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 900–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, Y.; Mao, N.; Feng, S.; Zhang, C.; Wang, F.; Chen, Y.; Zeng, J.; Jiang, J.X. Perylene-Containing Conjugated Microporous Polymers for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2017, 218, 1700049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lan, Y.; Yang, C.; Zhang, Y.; An, W.; Xue, H.; Ding, S.; Zhou, P.; Wang, W. Pyrrolidine-based chiral porous polymers for heterogeneous organocatalysis in water. Polym. Chem. 2019, 10, 3298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, G.; Ou, W.; Wang, J.; Xu, Y.; Xu, D.; Sun, T.; Xiao, S.; Wang, M.; Chen, W.; Su, C. Stable, carrier separation tailorable conjugated microporous polymers as a platform for highly efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 245, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sun, L.; Zou, Y.; Liang, Z.; Yu, J.; Xu, R. A one-pot synthetic strategy via tandem Suzuki–Heck reactions for the construction of luminescent microporous organic polymers. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sun, L.; Liang, Z.; Yu, J.; Xu, R. Luminescent microporous organic polymers containing the 1,3,5-tri (4-ethenylphenyl) benzene unit constructed by Heck coupling reaction. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 1932–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mohamed, M.G.; Lee, C.C.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Luder, J.; Yu, M.H.; Li, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Chueh, C.C.; Kuo, S.W. Exploitation of Two-Dimensional Conjugated Covalent Organic Frameworks Based on Tetraphenylethylene with Bicarbazole and Pyrene Units and Applications in Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 11448–11459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Kuo, C.H.; Alshehri, A.; Young, C.; Yamauchi, Y.; Kim, J.; Kuo, S.W. Strategic design of triphenylamine- and triphenyltriazine-based two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks for CO2 uptake and energy storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 19532–19541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mohamed, M.G.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Ahmed, M.M.M.; Kuo, S.W. Direct Synthesis of Microporous Bicarbazole-Based Covalent Triazine Frameworks for High-Performance Energy Storage and Carbon Dioxide Uptake. ChemPlusChem 2019, 84, 1767–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Côté, A.P.; Benin, A.I.; Ockwig, N.W.; O’Keeffe, M.; Matzger, A.J.; Yaghi, O.M. Porous, crystalline, covalent organic frameworks. Science 2005, 310, 1166–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Jiang, W.; Yue, H.; Shuttleworth, P.S.; Xie, P.; Li, S.; Guo, J. Adamantane-Based Micro- and Ultra-Microporous Frameworks for Efficient Small Gas and Toxic Organic Vapor Adsorption. Polymers 2019, 11, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Liu, M.; Guo, L.; Jin, S.; Tan, B. Covalent triazine frameworks: Synthesis and applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 5153–5172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pan, L.; Chen, Q.; Zhu, J.H.; Yu, J.G.; He, Y.J.; Han, B.H. Hypercrosslinked porous polycarbazoles via one-step oxidative coupling reaction and Friedel–Crafts alkylation. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 2478–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yu, H.; Tian, M.; Shen, C.; Wang, Z. Facile preparation of porous polybenzimidazole networks and adsorption behavior of CO2 gas, organic and water vapors. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 961–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fang, D.; Li, X.; Zou, M.; Guo, X.; Zhang, A. Carbazole-functionalized hyper-cross-linked polymers for CO2 uptake based on Friedel–Crafts polymerization on 9-phenylcarbazole. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 2856–2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Hung, Y.H.; Mansoure, T.H.; Yu, H.H.; Hsu, Y.S.; Wu, K.C.W.; Kuo, S.W. Synthesis of [3+3] β-ketoenamine-tethered covalent organic frameworks (COFs) for high-performance supercapacitance and CO2 storage. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2019, 103, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Young, C.; Kim, J.; You, J.; Yamuuchi, Y.; Kuo, S.W. Hollow Microspherical and Microtubular [3+3] Carbazole-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks and Their Gas and Energy Storage Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 2019, 11, 9343–9354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, X.; Luo, Y.; Lyu, Y. POSS-based microporous polymers: Efficient Friedel-Crafts synthesis, CO2 capture and separation properties. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2017, 250, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W. Functional Polyimide/Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane Nanocomposites. Polymers 2019, 11, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Shen, R.; Du, Y.; Yang, X.; Liu, H. Silsesquioxanes-based porous functional polymers for water purification. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 7518–7529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W. Functional Silica and Carbon Nanocomposites Based on Polybenzoxazines. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2019, 220, 1800306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, X.; Zhao, S.; Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W.; Xin, Z. Crystallization behaviors of poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET) with monosilane isobutyl-polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS). J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 14642–14655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cordes, D.B.; Lickiss, P.D.; Rataboul, F. Recent developments in the chemistry of cubic polyhedral oligosilsesquioxane. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2081–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, W.C.; Liu, Y.T.; Kuo, S.W. Highly Thermal Stable Phenolic Resin Based on Double-Decker-Shaped POSS Nanocomposites for Supercapacitors. Polymers 2020, 12, 2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, W.C.; Tsao, Y.H.; Wang, C.F.; Huang, C.F.; Dai, L.; Chen, T.; Kuo, S.W. Main Chain–Type Block Copolymers through Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization from Double-Decker–Shaped Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane Hybrids. Polymers 2020, 12, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Wang, Y.K.; Tsai, F.C.; Ma, C.C.; Wang, M.L.; Kuo, S.W. Using Methacryl-Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane as the Thermal Stabilizer and Plasticizer in Poly (vinyl chloride) Nanocomposites. Polymers 2019, 11, 1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Feng, Y.; Jia, Y.; Guang, S.; Xu, H. Study on thermal enhancement mechanism of POSS-containing hybrid nanocomposites and relationship between thermal properties and their molecular structure. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 115, 2212–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Madhavan, K.; Reddy, B.S.R. Synthesis and characterization of polyurethane hybrids: Influence of the polydimethylsiloxane linear chain and silsesquioxane cubic structure on the thermal and mechanical properties of polyurethane hybrids. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 113, 4052–4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, H.; Liu, H. Selective dye adsorption and metal ion detection using multifunctional silsesquioxane-based tetraphenylethene-linked nanoporous polymers. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 9156–9162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yang, X.; Liu, H. Ferrocene-functionalized silsesquioxane-based porous polymer for efficient removal of dyes and heavy metal ions. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 13504–13511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, W.C.; Ahmed, M.M.M.; Wang, C.F.; Huang, C.F.; Kuo, S.W. Highly thermally stable mesoporous Poly (cyanate ester) featuring double-decker–shaped polyhedral silsesquioxane framework. Polymer 2019, 185, 121940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sun, R.; Huo, X.; Lu, H.; Feng, S.; Wang, D.; Liu, H. Recyclable fluorescent paper sensor for visual detection of nitroaromatic explosives. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 265, 476–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sun, R.; Feng, S.; Wang, D.; Liu, H. Fluorescence-Tuned Silicone Elastomers for Multicolored Ultraviolet Light-Emitting Diodes: Realizing the Processability of Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane-Based Hybrid Porous Polymers. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 6370–6376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chen, M.; Li, L.; Nie, H.; Tong, J.; Yan, L.; Xu, B.; Jing Zhi Sun, J.Z.; Tian, W.; Zhao, Z.; Qin, A.; et al. Tetraphenylpyrazine-based AIEgens: Facile preparation and tunable light emission. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 1932–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Roll, M.F.; Kampf, J.W.; Kim, Y.; Yi, E.; Laine, R.M. Nano Building Blocks via Iodination of [PhSiO1.5] n, Forming [p-I-C6H4SiO1.5] n (n = 8, 10, 12), and a New Route to High-Surface-Area, Thermally Stable, Microporous Materials via Thermal Elimination of I2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 10171–10183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chaikittisilp, W.; Sugawara, A.; Shimojima, A.; Okubo, T. Microporous Hybrid Polymer with a Certain Crystallinity Built from Functionalized Cubic Siloxane Cages as a Singular Building Unit. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 4841–4843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shu, G.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y.; Jiang, J.X.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Wang, F. Hypercrosslinked silole-containing microporous organic polymers with N-functionalized pore surfaces for gas storage and separation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 45907–45916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, G.; Wang, Y.; Shen, C.; Ju, Z.; Yuan, D. A facile synthesis of microporous organic polymers for efficient gas storage and separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 3051–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 13 00221 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of (A) tetraphenylpyrazine (TPP) and (B) tetraphenylethene (TPE).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of (A) tetraphenylpyrazine (TPP) and (B) tetraphenylethene (TPE).
Polymers 13 00221 sch001
Polymers 13 00221 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of (A) polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane tetraphenylpyrazine (POSS-TPP) and (B) polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane tetraphenylethene (POSS-TPE).
Scheme 2. Synthesis of (A) polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane tetraphenylpyrazine (POSS-TPP) and (B) polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane tetraphenylethene (POSS-TPE).
Polymers 13 00221 sch002
Polymers 13 00221 g001 550
Figure 1. 1H-NMR spectra of (A) POSS-TPP and (B) POSS-TPE, and the 13C-NMR spectra of (C) POSS-TPP and (D) POSS-TPE.
Figure 1. 1H-NMR spectra of (A) POSS-TPP and (B) POSS-TPE, and the 13C-NMR spectra of (C) POSS-TPP and (D) POSS-TPE.
Polymers 13 00221 g001
Polymers 13 00221 g002 550
Figure 2. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of (A) octavinylsilsequioxane (OVS), (B) TPP, (C) TPE, (D) POSS-TPP, and (E) POSS-TPE.
Figure 2. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of (A) octavinylsilsequioxane (OVS), (B) TPP, (C) TPE, (D) POSS-TPP, and (E) POSS-TPE.
Polymers 13 00221 g002
Polymers 13 00221 g003 550
Figure 3. Solid-state 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra of the states of (A) POSS-TPP and (B) POSS-TPE, where * is the side band of solid state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR).
Figure 3. Solid-state 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra of the states of (A) POSS-TPP and (B) POSS-TPE, where * is the side band of solid state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR).
Polymers 13 00221 g003
Polymers 13 00221 g004 550
Figure 4. 29Si spectra of (A) POSS-TPP and (B) POSS-TPE.
Figure 4. 29Si spectra of (A) POSS-TPP and (B) POSS-TPE.
Polymers 13 00221 g004
Polymers 13 00221 g005 550
Figure 5. (A,B) TGA profiles of OVS, TPP, TPE, POSS-TPP, and POSS-TPE.
Figure 5. (A,B) TGA profiles of OVS, TPP, TPE, POSS-TPP, and POSS-TPE.
Polymers 13 00221 g005
Polymers 13 00221 g006 550
Figure 6. XRD pattern of (A) POSS-TPP and (B) POSS-TPE.
Figure 6. XRD pattern of (A) POSS-TPP and (B) POSS-TPE.
Polymers 13 00221 g006
Polymers 13 00221 g007 550
Figure 7. N2 adsoprtion and desorption measurements of (A) POSS-TPP and (B) POSS-TPE; pore size distributions of (C) POSS-TPP and (D) POSS-TPE; and TEM images of (E) POSS-TPP and (F) POSS-TPE.
Figure 7. N2 adsoprtion and desorption measurements of (A) POSS-TPP and (B) POSS-TPE; pore size distributions of (C) POSS-TPP and (D) POSS-TPE; and TEM images of (E) POSS-TPP and (F) POSS-TPE.
Polymers 13 00221 g007
Polymers 13 00221 g008 550
Figure 8. CO2 uptake profiles of (A) POSS-TPP and (B) POSS-TPE.
Figure 8. CO2 uptake profiles of (A) POSS-TPP and (B) POSS-TPE.
Polymers 13 00221 g008
Polymers 13 00221 g009 550
Figure 9. (A,B) UV-Vis absorption profile of the iodine solution after stirring POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE for different times (0–24 h). (C) The calibration curve of iodine was measured through recording the UV-Vis spectra of different I2 concentrations in hexane. (D) Maximum absorption capacity of the iodine by the absorbents of POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE.
Figure 9. (A,B) UV-Vis absorption profile of the iodine solution after stirring POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE for different times (0–24 h). (C) The calibration curve of iodine was measured through recording the UV-Vis spectra of different I2 concentrations in hexane. (D) Maximum absorption capacity of the iodine by the absorbents of POSS-TPP and POSS-TPE.
Polymers 13 00221 g009
Table
Table 1. Thermal stability and porosity properties of OVS, TPP, TPE, and their corresponding polymers.
Table 1. Thermal stability and porosity properties of OVS, TPP, TPE, and their corresponding polymers.
SampleTd5 (°C)Td10 (°C)Char Yield (wt.%)Surface Area (m2/g)Pore Size (nm)
OVS2422554––
TPP2963120––
TPE2462630––
POSS-TPP267398712701.04, 1.86
POSS-TPE378475737411.08, 2.09
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gamal Mohamed, M.; Tsai, M.-Y.; Wang, C.-F.; Huang, C.-F.; Danko, M.; Dai, L.; Chen, T.; Kuo, S.-W. Multifunctional Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane (POSS) Based Hybrid Porous Materials for CO2 Uptake and Iodine Adsorption. Polymers 2021, 13, 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020221

AMA Style

Gamal Mohamed M, Tsai M-Y, Wang C-F, Huang C-F, Danko M, Dai L, Chen T, Kuo S-W. Multifunctional Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane (POSS) Based Hybrid Porous Materials for CO2 Uptake and Iodine Adsorption. Polymers. 2021; 13(2):221. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020221

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gamal Mohamed, Mohamed, Mei-Yin Tsai, Chih-Feng Wang, Chih-Feng Huang, Martin Danko, Lizong Dai, Tao Chen, and Shiao-Wei Kuo. 2021. "Multifunctional Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane (POSS) Based Hybrid Porous Materials for CO2 Uptake and Iodine Adsorption" Polymers 13, no. 2: 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020221

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop