Next Article in Journal
A Multi-View Stereo Measurement System Based on a Laser Scanner for Fine Workpieces
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Uniaxial Stress on the Shear-Wave Spectrum Propagating in Steel Members
Previous Article in Journal
Forecasting Pedestrian Movements Using Recurrent Neural Networks: An Application of Crowd Monitoring Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimal Placement of Virtual Masses for Structural Damage Identification
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 19
Issue 2
10.3390/s19020383
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Recent Advances in Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring Applications

by
Hanfei Mei
1,*,
Mohammad Faisal Haider
1,
Roshan Joseph
1,
Asaad Migot
1,2 and
Victor Giurgiutiu
1
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina, 300 Main Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Thi-Qar University, Nasiriyah 64001, Iraq
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2019, 19(2), 383; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19020383
Submission received: 28 November 2018 / Revised: 10 January 2019 / Accepted: 16 January 2019 / Published: 18 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this paper, some recent piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWAS) progress achieved in our laboratory for active materials and smart structures (LAMSS) at the University of South Carolina: http: //www.me.sc.edu/research/lamss/ group is presented. First, the characterization of the PWAS materials shows that no significant change in the microstructure after exposure to high temperature and nuclear radiation, and the PWAS transducer can be used in harsh environments for structural health monitoring (SHM) applications. Next, PWAS active sensing of various damage types in aluminum and composite structures are explored. PWAS transducers can successfully detect the simulated crack and corrosion damage in aluminum plates through the wavefield analysis, and the simulated delamination damage in composite plates through the damage imaging method. Finally, the novel use of PWAS transducers as acoustic emission (AE) sensors for in situ AE detection during fatigue crack growth is presented. The time of arrival of AE signals at multiple PWAS transducers confirms that the AE signals are originating from the crack, and that the amplitude decay due to geometric spreading is observed.

1. Introduction

Structural health monitoring (SHM) is an emerging interdisciplinary research field, which aims at detecting damage and providing a diagnosis of structural health [1,2,3,4,5]. Among the SHM technologies, Lamb wave, a type of ultrasonic guided waves propagating between two parallel surfaces without much energy loss, is suitable for the large-area inspection of complicated structures [6,7]. Piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWAS) were developed by our LAMSS group as convenient enablers for generating and receiving Lamb waves in structures for SHM applications [8].
Depending on the type of application, PWAS can be utilized for (i) active sensing of far-field damage using pulse-echo, pitch-catch, and phased-array methods, (ii) active sensing of near-field damage using the electromechanical impedance method, and (iii) passive sensing of acoustic emissions at the tip of advancing cracks and low-velocity impacts [8]. The main advantage of PWAS transducers over conventional ultrasonic probes is their low cost and light weight. They can be permanently bonded on the host structures in large quantities, and achieve real-time monitoring of the structural health status. These PWAS transducers can also be used in a harsh environment (e.g., high temperature, nuclear radiation, or a vacuum environment). A proper sensor characterization would be required before its installation on the host structure in a harsh environment.
In recent years, many researchers have explored the capability of PWAS for SHM applications, such as the characterization of PWAS [9,10,11,12,13], impact localization [14,15,16,17,18,19], acoustic emission (AE) detection [20,21], and damage detection in isotropic and composite plates [22,23,24,25,26,27]. These studies facilitate the understanding of PWAS-based SHM applications.
In order to use the PWAS transducer as an SHM transducer in harsh environments, PWAS material properties should be investigated, and PWAS transducers should be defect-free after high temperature and radiation exposure. Baptista et al. [9] conducted an experimental study of the effect of temperature on the electrical impedance of the piezoelectric sensors, and they found that the temperature effects were strongly frequency-dependent. Similarly, Haider et al. [10] investigated the irreversible change in PWAS electromechanical (E/M) impedance and admittance signature under high-temperature exposure. It was concluded that the changes in anti-resonance and resonance frequencies have a linear relationship with temperature. In addition, the sensitivity characterization of high temperature piezoelectric transducers was performed by using resonance analysis [11]. Sinclair and Chertov [12] presented a comprehensive literature study of the radiation endurance of a piezoelectric transducer.
General PWAS sensing technology can be cast into two methodological categories: passive sensing and active sensing. PWAS passive sensing methods only record events passively, which happens during the period of interest. By analyzing the recorded signal, diagnosis can be made on the health status of the structure. Examples of PWAS passive sensing methods can be found in the impact localization [15,18] and AE detection [20,21]. Park et al. [15] proposed a new technique for predicting the impact location on an anisotropic plate by analyzing the geometric shape of the wavefront, and it did not require prior knowledge of the material properties. Qiu et al. [18] conducted an impact localization on an aircraft composite wing box using piezoelectric sensor networks, and achieved promising results. Apart from impact localization using PWAS transducers, preliminary work has also been performed to capture fatigue AE hits [20,21].
In contrast to PWAS passive sensing, PWAS active sensing methods interrogate the structures with defined excitations and record the corresponding response. One common active sensing method in SHM applications is the pitch-catch experiment, where one PWAS transducer acts as the transmitter and sends out Lamb waves, and another PWAS transducer acts as the receiver and picks up the sensing signal. The subtraction between the pristine and damaged responses may indicate the presence and severity of the damage. To achieve more complicated diagnostic approaches for SHM applications, several sensors may work together in a systematically designed manner, forming a sensor network. Advanced damage imaging techniques have been developed by using the phased array [28,29] and sparse array [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. Substantial research has focused on the research of damage imaging algorithms for damage localization and characterization, using a sparse PWAS array, including tomography [30,31,32], the delay-and-sum imaging method [33,34,35], the time-reversal imaging approach [36,37,38], correlation-based imaging algorithm [39,40], probabilistic and statistical imaging methods [41,42,43], and the minimum variance imaging method [44,45,46]. Recently, Kudela et al. [48] proposed a Lamb wave-focusing method to detect and visualize the crack in an aluminum plate, and the damage imaging resolution was improved compared to the original delay-and-sum algorithm. Xu et al. [49] developed a weighted sparse reconstruction-based anomaly imaging method for damage detection on composite plates, and anomaly imaging with fewer artifacts was achieved.
Moreover, various methods have been used for wavefield analysis. In this active sensing method, one PWAS transducer was used to excite Lamb waves propagating in the structures, and the wavefield was measured by a scanning laser Doppler vibrometer (SLDV). The damage can be unveiled through wavefield analysis, such as the wavefield amplitude profile [49], frequency-wavenumber filtering [50,51,52,53], standing wave filtering [54,55,56], zero-lag cross-correlation imaging [57,58], local wavenumber analysis [59,60,61], and wavenumber adaptive image filtering [62,63,64]. Staszewski et al. [49] used the amplitude profiles of the wavefield to detect the delamination damage in composites. Sohn et al. [54] proposed a standing wave filter to isolate the standing waves from the propagating waves for delamination detection in composites. He and Yuan [57] employed the zero-lag cross-correlation (ZLCC) imaging condition for damage imaging in a composite plate, using a single piezoelectric wafer for excitation. In recent years, various wavenumber imaging methods were applied for impact-induced delamination detection. Girolamo et al. [58] applied the ZLCC imaging condition for visualizing impact damage in a honeycomb composite panel. Rogge and Leckey [59] presented a local wavenumber domain analysis to process the wavefield, and they demonstrated that it could be used to quantify the delamination depth and size. Tian et al. [60,61] improved the damage visualization algorithm by using filtering reconstruction imaging and spatial wavenumber imaging. Kudela et al. [64] studied the relation between impact energy and BVID detectability, using wavenumber adaptive image filtering, and they found that damage caused by the impact of 10 J or higher could be successfully detected.
In this paper, some recent PWAS progress achieved in our LAMSS group is reported, including studies of (a) PWAS endurance in harsh temperature and radiation environments; (b) PWAS active sensing of various damage types in aluminum and composite structures; (c) PWAS passive sensing of acoustic emission (AE) signals from fatigue crack growth in aluminum coupons. First, the characterization of PWAS materials is conducted. The endurance of the PWAS after exposure to high temperature and nuclear radiation was also assessed for harsh environmental applications. Next, applications of PWAS, using active sensing methods for detecting the simulated crack and corrosion damage in aluminum plates, and the simulated delamination damage in composite plates are conducted. Finally, the novel use of PWAS transducers as AE sensors for in situ AE detection during fatigue crack growth is presented.

2. Characterization of PWAS

In this section, PWAS transducers made with piezoelectric material lead zirconate titanate (PbZrO3TiO3 or PZT) were investigated. PZT exhibits large electromechanical coupling coefficients and piezoelectric constants [65]. For PZT-PWAS, APC 850 type transducers [66] were used in this research. The PZT-PWAS transducer is circular in shape, and the diameter is 7 mm. The wafer has a PZT thin film with Ag electrodes on both sides. The thickness of the PZT-PWAS transducer is 0.2 mm. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was done on the PWAS transducer to obtain chemical compositions of the PWAS. Figure 1 shows the EDS spectrum of PZT-PWAS. The figure confirms that PZT-PWAS contains lead (Pb), zirconium (Zr), titanium (Ti), oxygen (O), and silver (Ag) electrode.
The significance of SHM has been emphasized in many fields, such as dry cask storage canister (nuclear-spent fuel storage), pressure vessel and pipe (PVP), turbine blade and so on; where attention is being drawn to the successful implementation of SHM techniques, due to temperature variation and radiation. The PZT material used in a PWAS transducer is a ferroelectric material. For most ferroelectric materials, the existence of a domain structure or domain wall makes a significant influence on the material properties. In a PZT solid-solution system, the material properties may be changed, due to the change in the domain size and the domain wall motion [67,68,69]. In addition, the PWAS transducers are susceptible to damage after exposure to harsh environments. A scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was also done to visualize the microstructure of the PWAS. Figure 2 shows the cross-section of PZT-PWAS: (a) at room temperature; (b) after exposure to 250 °C temperature; and (c) after exposure to 225 kGy radiation. There are no significant changes in the microstructure or PZT grain after exposure to high temperature and radiation. Hence, PWAS can be integrated into the SHM system for successful damage detection.

3. Applications of PWAS for Detecting Damage in Isotropic Plates

In this section, damage detections on aluminum plates using a circular PWAS and a long PWAS were performed.

3.1. Corrosion Damage Detection in an Aluminum Plate Using a Circular PWAS

In this experiment, a 2.032 mm 2024-T3 aluminum plate was examined. The material properties are given in Table 1. A simulated corrosion damage was made on the 2024-T3 aluminum plate to study the damage detection by using the PWAS active sensing method, as shown in Figure 3.
To excite Lamb waves in the aluminum plate, a circular PWAS (APC 850, 7 mm in diameter and 0.2 mm thick) was bonded on the top surface as the excitation source. Figure 4 shows the schematic of the experimental setup. The function generator was used to generate a three-count Hanning window modulated tone burst with the center frequency of 200 kHz, which was amplified to 50 Vpp by the power amplifier and applied to the circular PWAS.
Under electrical excitation, the PWAS generates Lamb waves in the aluminum plate. Lamb waves propagate with an out-spreading pattern, interact with damage, undergo scattered and mode conversion, and are finally picked up by a Polytec PSV-400-M2 scanning laser Doppler vibrometer (SLDV). The quantity measured by the SLDV is the out-of-plane velocity of the bottom surface. Reflective tape was used to improve the signal quality. In the experiment, a line scan and an area scan on the specimen surface were carried out to detect the corrosion damage. The locations of the circular PWAS, corrosion damage, and special recording points are illustrated in Figure 4.

3.1.1. Damage Detection by using a SLDV Line Scan

In the experiment, the time-space Lamb wave data was obtained from the SLDV line scan, as shown in Figure 5a. To obtain the experimental frequency–wavenumber dispersion curves, the measured time–space wavefield u ( t , x ) was transformed into the frequency–wavenumber domain by applying a two-dimensional (2D) fast Fourier transform (FFT). Figure 5b,c show the time–space wavefield and the corresponding frequency–wavenumber dispersion curves, the wave transmission and reflection due to the corrosion damage can be clearly observed. Hence, the damage can be easily detected by using the wavefield analysis.

3.1.2. Damage Detection by Using an SLDV Area Scan

In this section, an SLDV area scan was conducted to measure the wave interaction with the corrosion damage under PWAS excitation. Figure 6 shows a transient spatial wavefield in the plate. At 30 μs, the fast propagating S0 mode with a long wavelength, and the slowly propagating A0 mode with a short wavelength could be identified. The mode-converted A0 waves could be noticed, propagating with a short wavelength from S0 interaction with the damage. At 50 μs, after A0 waves interacted with damage, the scattered A0 waves could be observed, as well as the shadow behind the damage. Therefore, the damage could be visualized from the measured wavefield.
Figure 7 shows the waveforms at various sensing locations for the 200 kHz excitation. The signals at location #1, #2, and #3 show that the scattered A0 wave amplitude increases when the sensing location moves closer to the damage. The signal at location #4 shows the mode-converted A0 wave packet from the S0 interaction with the damage.

3.2. Crack Detection in a Stiffened Aluminum Plate Using Long PWAS

This section describes an experimental procedure to analyze the scattered Lamb wave to detect a horizontal crack at the root of the stiffener in an aluminum plate.

3.2.1. Experimental Procedure

Two aluminum plates with a pristine stiffener and cracked stiffener were manufactured for the experimental study. Electrical discharge machining (EDM) method was used to create a crack along the entire length of the stiffener. The height and width of the stiffener is 8.47 mm. The thickness of the plate is 4.23 mm. For the crack stiffener, the crack width is half of the stiffener width, and the crack is present along the entire length of the stiffener (Figure 8). The experimental setup and the plates with pristine stiffener and cracked stiffener are shown in Figure 8. Two 60 mm × 5 mm × 0.2 mm PWAS transducers were bonded in a straight line on the top and bottom surfaces of the plate to create a line source. On both plates, the PWAS transducers were bonded 200 mm away from the stiffener. Two PWAS were excited simultaneously in opposite phase to generate A0 Lamb wave, selectively. The excitation signal is a three-count tone burst at 150 kHz generated by a Tektronix AFG3052C dual channel function generator. A power amplifier was used to amplify the excitation signal, which strengthens the reflected and transmitted signal from the discontinuity or damage. To create non-reflecting boundary condition, absorbing clay was applied all around the plate boundaries.

3.2.2. Experimental Results

The wavefields were measured using SLDV. Figure 9a is the schematic of the SLDV measurement. Figure 9b–e show the reflected and transmitted wavefields for the pristine stiffener and cracked stiffener, respectively. It can be found that the long PWAS transducers can successfully generate the straight crested A0 mode Lamb wave. It also shows a minimal reflection from the plate edges, due to the use of absorbing clay. In addition, these figures show that the scattered wavefields are also straight crested waves after interacting with the discontinuity, as expected.
Figure 10a shows the schematic diagram of the sensing locations. Sensing location 1 is 170 mm before the stiffener and the sensing location 2 is 200 mm after the stiffener. Figure 10b–e show the experimental scattered waveforms for the pristine and cracked stiffener, respectively. The corresponding fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the incident and scattered waves for the pristine and cracked stiffener are given in Figure 11.
The reflected and transmitted Lamb waves show a similar pattern in the time–domain signals for the pristine and cracked stiffener. However, the frequency response of the scattered signals shows a clear change in the amplitude of the scattered wavefields, due to the presence of the crack. Also, the shifting of the frequency spectrum due to the presence of the crack is an important phenomenon to note. The transmitted A0 Lamb wave has clear anti-resonance at 150 kHz for the cracked stiffener. Such information may be useful for crack detection in complex geometry.

4. Applications of PWAS for Detecting Damage in Anisotropic Plates

In this section, a 1.6 mm thick in-house cross-ply carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite plate with a stacking sequence of [0/90]2s was examined. The delamination is generated by inserting a 50 mm diameter Teflon film between the first ply and second ply during the ply lay-up process. Figure 12 shows the configuration of the composite plate. The engineering elastic properties of the unidirectional prepreg are given in Table 2.
A network of PWAS transducers and the damage imaging method were used to detect and quantify the delamination in the cross-ply composite plate. In recent work [70,71], an improved imaging method was developed to obtain accurate results of localization and sizing damages in metallic plates and composite laminates. Here, some more recent results in this direction are presented. The gist of our methodology [70,71] is to perform a point-by-point detection and localization of damage as a first step before using the imaging methods. Four sensors are distributed to make a cross sign on the area of interest. From the scattered waves of pulse-echo experiments, the difference in the time-of-flight (TOF) values of scattered waves of sensors are determined. If these difference values are close to zero, the damage is at the center of the area of interest. If there is difference in TOF of scattered waves, the damage location is close to the sensor that has less TOF. Based on the location of damage and sensors, the directions of the incident and scattered waves are determined. Then, the direction-dependent group velocities of incident and scattered waves for all the individual sensing paths on the composite plate are determined using the semi-analytical finite element (SAFE) approach [72].

4.1. Experimental Setup

The experimental setup of using SHM techniques to detect the delamination in the composite plate is shown in Figure 13. Eight PWAS transducers were bonded onto the plate surface to form a sensor network. The diameter of each PWAS transducer is 7 mm, and the thickness is 0.2 mm. The clay was applied to the plate edges to absorb boundary reflections. An Agilent 33120A function generator was used to generate the excitation signal. The response signals were recorded by an oscilloscope.
The excitation signal was a three-count tone burst signal at a center frequency of 330 kHz. This frequency was chosen based on the tuning curve. Experimental tuning curves of the cross-ply CFRP composite plate in the 0° and 45° directions are shown in Figure 14. It can be observed that only a single mode (S0 mode) is dominant around the 330 kHz frequency in the 0° direction. However, SH0 mode was also observed as strong as S0 mode in the 45° direction. The excitation of the SH0 wave in the off-axial direction is due to the anisotropic behavior of the composite plate already reported by Giurgiutiu [73].

4.2. Experimental Results

The signals were collected by using pulse-echo and pitch-catch modes. First, the pulse-echo experiments were conducted for the PWAS S2, S4, S5, and S7 to detect and localize the damage using the proposed method in Section 4. Figure 15a shows the pulse-echo signals of the sensing paths S2-S2, S4-S4, S5-S5, and S7-S7. It can be noted that all of the signals have strong scattered S0 waves with the same TOF values. Hence, the damage is located at the center, as shown in Figure 15b.
In the pitch-catch mode, each PWAS transducer acted as a transmitter, whereas the rest of them in the network acted as receivers. For demonstration, only one set of signals is shown in Figure 16. In this set, PWAS S2 is the transmitter and PWAS S4 is the receiver. It can be observed that both S0 and SH0 are dominant in this sensing path (45° direction), which agrees with the experimental tuning curves in the 45° direction (Figure 14). The incident waves were determined as the S0 and SH0 modes, based on the group-velocity dispersion curve. Figure 17 shows the group-velocity directivity plot at 330 kHz. The curves indicate that Lamb waves propagate with various velocities in different directions. It can be observed that S0 mode has the highest group velocity, while A0 mode has the lowest group velocity. SH0 mode possesses a group velocity between A0 and S0, and it shows self-crossing behavior, as reported in Glushkov [74]. The scattered SH0 wave, due to the delamination, can be determined by calculating the TOF of incident path (PWAS S2 to damage) and damage path (damage to PWAS S4) using the corresponding group velocities and distances.
Based on the time of flight (TOF) of scattered SH0 waves, the imaging method can be used to detect and quantify the delamination in the plate. The basic idea of the imaging method is to divide the interested area into pixels, and to find the field values of these pixels for each sensing path. The TOF of every pixel can be determined by using Equation (1):
t i j = ( x T − x i ) 2 + ( y T − y j ) 2 v g 1 + ( x i − x R ) 2 + ( y j − y R ) 2 v g 2
where t i j is the TOF of every pixel, and x T ,   y T ,   x R ,   y R ,   x i ,   y j are the coordinates of the transmitter PWAS, receiver PWAS, and pixel, respectively. v g 1 and v g 2 are the group velocities of the incident path (transmitter PWAS to damage) and damage path (damage to receiver PWAS), respectively. These group velocities are determined from Figure 17, based on the direction of the incident and scattered waves. When the pixels lie on the damage orbit of a particular sensing path, which means t i j = t d ( t d is the TOF of scattered wave). In this case, the field value of these pixels is maximum.
Figure 18 gives the damage orbit for a certain sensing path. To determine the size of the delamination area, the sensing paths of multiple transmitters around the area of interest were used to get multiple intersection points that represent the damage edges. A new methodology was implemented to visualize the delamination without setting a threshold, using a combination of summation and multiplication algorithms. In this methodology, the summation algorithm [71] is used to extract the individual image of all the sensing paths for each PWAS transmitter. These images have strong intersection points, which represent the delamination edges, and the rest are undesirable orbits. The multiplication algorithm is used to fuse all of these individual images, to obtain the final image for the delamination, which does not require setting of a threshold. Figure 19 shows the final imaging result of the delamination. It can be found that the results of the imaging method match well with the real delamination. The edges of the 50 mm delamination can be observed.

5. PWAS as an AE Sensor for In Situ AE Detection during a Fatigue Crack Event

Application of PWAS as an acoustic emission (AE) sensor is presented in this section. AE events in metallic or composite materials can be generated, due to various phenomena such as friction, plastic deformation, crack growth event, etc. Of all the causes, fatigue crack growth is a problem of great importance in metals.
To understand the sensing capability of PWAS to detect AE signals due to a crack growth event, PWAS transducers were used as an in situ sensor on a high-strength aluminum 2024-T3 specimen while undergoing fatigue crack growth. The aluminum specimen was 103 mm in width, 305 mm in, and 1 mm thick. A 1 mm hole was drilled at the geometric center of the specimen. Fatigue loading was applied on the specimen to generate a pre-crack of 14 mm tip-to-tip length. For the pre-crack generation, fatigue loading from 13.85 kN to 1.38 kN at a frequency of 10 Hz was applied. After initiating the crack approximately up to 14 mm tip to tip, two PWAS transducers at 6 mm and 25 mm from the hole, as well as two S9225 sensors at 6 mm and 25 mm from the hole were installed on the aluminum plate, as shown in Figure 20. S9225 is a commonly used and commercially available AE sensor. The S9225 sensor was used to make a comparison between PWAS and S9225 in this experiment. The test specimen installed with PWAS and S9225 transducers was mounted on the MTS machine. The fatigue loading was continued to vary between 13.85 kN and 1.38 kN with a loading rate of 2 Hz, and simultaneous AE measurements were performed. The experimental setup for capturing the AE signal from the fatigue crack growth is presented in Figure 20. AE signals during the crack growth were captured by using PWAS and S9225 sensors. The sensors are connected to the acoustic preamplifier. The acoustic preamplifier is a bandpass filter, which can filter out signals between 30 kHz to 700 kHz. The preamplifier is then connected to a four-channel Mistras AE system for processing the signals.
The crack growth on the specimen due to 2000 fatigue loading cycles from 14 mm to 16 mm is presented in Figure 21. The initial crack is presented in the green box, and the final crack in the blue box. The locations of the initial crack tips were marked using the blue lines, and the locations of the final crack tips were marked using red lines. The crack grew by approximately 2 mm. AE signals were captured simultaneously during the fatigue crack growth.
A particular AE event captured by PWAS 1 and S9225 1 sensors is presented in Figure 22. The relative time of arrival of the signals at the PWAS 1 and S9225 1 sensors installed equidistant from the crack was obtained from the Mistras AE system. The time of arrival of signals at PWAS 1 and S9225 1 was found to be the same, which confirmed that the signals corresponded to an AE event happening that was equidistant from the sensors, which is the crack location. If the AE event was happening at a different location other than the crack, the time of arrival at the PWAS 1 and S9225 1 sensors would be different. In this way, it was confirmed that the AE signal captured was originating from the crack.
Several AE signals originating from the crack were captured during this crack growth event, as shown in Figure 23. From the time of arrival of the AE signals at PWAS 1 and PWAS 2, signals corresponding to the same AE event were identified. The sequence of arrival, as well as the amplitude of the AE signals, are presented in Table 3. The sequence of arrival confirms that the AE signals were originating from the crack. Geometric spreading caused the amplitude of AE signal to decay while propagating. This was also observed from the corresponding amplitude values of the signals at PWAS 1 and PWAS 2. The AE signals were found to have a similar signature by comparing the waveform, as well as the frequency spectrum of the signals. It can be observed that the frequency spectrum maintains its signature when reaching PWAS 2.
From the experimental investigation presented in this section, it can be concluded that PWAS can be used as an in situ sensor for detecting AE signals during the fatigue crack growth. Fatigue loading was applied on the specimen, to grow the crack, and simultaneous measurement of AE signals was performed. The time of arrival of AE signals at multiple sensors confirms that the AE signals are originating from the crack. The amplitude decay of AE signals due to geometric spreading was also observed through AE measurements at PWAS transducers located at 6 mm and 25 mm from the crack.

6. Conclusions

In this paper, PWAS endurance in harsh temperatures and radiation environments, and PWAS active and passive sensing methods for SHM applications were demonstrated. First, the characterization of PWAS was conducted. No significant change in the microstructure or PZT grain after exposure to high temperature and radiation was found through the SEM technique. Proper characterization of PWAS allows a SHM system to infer the integrity of the transducers and separate transducer-flawed signals from structural defects in a harsh environment. For PWAS active sensing methods, PWAS was successfully used to detect the simulated crack and corrosion damage in aluminum plates, and simulated delamination damage in the composite plates. The frequency response of the scattered signals showed a clear change in the amplitude, due to the presence of the crack. The improved imaging method does not require a threshold to obtain the final image for the damage visualization. For the PWAS passive sensing methods, PWAS was successfully used as AE sensors for in situ AE detection during fatigue crack growth. The time of arrival of AE signals at multiple sensors confirms that the AE signals were originating from the crack. The amplitude decay of the AE signals due to geometric spreading was validated.

Author Contributions

In this article, the formal analysis was done by H.M. and M.F.H. The detailed methodology was provided by H.M., M.F.H., A.M., R.J., and V.G. H.M. prepared the original draft; review and editing were done by H.M., M.F.H., A.M., R.J., and V.G.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) grant number NNL15AA16C, Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) grant number FA9550-16-1-0401, US Department of Energy (DOE) grant number DE-NE 0000726, Office of Nuclear Energy (ONE) grant number DE-NE 0008400, and Office of Naval Research (ONR) grant number N00014-17-1-2829.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the help of the Electron Microscopy Center, USC for SEM.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Farrar, C.R.; Worden, K. An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2006, 365, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Su, Z.; Ye, L.; Lu, Y. Guided Lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: A review. J. Sound Vib. 2006, 295, 753–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ciang, C.C.; Lee, J.R.; Bang, H.J. Structural health monitoring for a wind turbine system: A review of damage detection methods. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2008, 19, 122001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fan, W.; Qiao, P. Vibration-based damage identification methods: A review and comparative study. Struct. Health Monit. 2011, 10, 83–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mitra, M.; Gopalakrishnan, S. Guided wave based structural health monitoring: A review. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 053001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Achenbach, J. Wave Propagation in Elastic Solids; North-Holland Publishing Company: London, UK, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rose, J.L. Ultrasonic Waves in Solid Media; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  8. Giurgiutiu, V. Structural Health Monitoring with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors, 2nd ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  9. Baptista, F.G.; Budoya, D.E.; de Almeida, V.A.; Ulson, J.A.C. An experimental study on the effect of temperature on piezoelectric sensors for impedance-based structural health monitoring. Sensors 2014, 14, 1208–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Haider, M.F.; Giurgiutiu, V.; Lin, B.; Yu, L. Irreversibility effects in piezoelectric wafer active sensors after exposure to high temperature. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 095019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bilgunde, P.N.; Bond, L.J. Resonance analysis of a high temperature piezoelectric disc for sensitivity characterization. Ultrasonics 2018, 87, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sinclair, A.N.; Chertov, A.M. Radiation endurance of piezoelectric ultrasonic transducers—A review. Ultrasonics 2015, 57, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Giurgiutiu, V.; Postolache, C.; Tudose, M. Radiation, temperature, and vacuum effects on piezoelectric wafer active sensors. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 035024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Si, L.; Baier, H. Real-time impact visualization inspection of aerospace composite structures with distributed sensors. Sensors 2015, 15, 16536–16556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Park, W.H.; Packo, P.; Kundu, T. Acoustic source localization in an anisotropic plate without knowing its material properties—A new approach. Ultrasonics 2017, 79, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. De Simone, M.E.; Ciampa, F.; Boccardi, S.; Meo, M. Impact source localisation in aerospace composite structures. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 125026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ren, Y.; Qiu, L.; Yuan, S.; Su, Z. A diagnostic imaging approach for online characterization of multi-impact in aircraft composite structures based on a scanning spatial-wavenumber filter of guided wave. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2017, 90, 44–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Qiu, L.; Deng, X.; Yuan, S.; Huang, Y.; Ren, Y. Impact monitoring for aircraft smart composite skins based on a lightweight sensor network and characteristic digital sequences. Sensors 2018, 18, 2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sen, N.; Kundu, T. A new wave front shape-based approach for acoustic source localization in an anisotropic plate without knowing its material properties. Ultrasonics 2018, 87, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Bhuiyan, M.Y.; Giurgiutiu, V. The signatures of acoustic emission waveforms from fatigue crack advancing in thin metallic plates. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 27, 015019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bhuiyan, M.Y.; Bao, J.; Poddar, B.; Giurgiutiu, V. Toward identifying crack-length-related resonances in acoustic emission waveforms for structural health monitoring applications. Struct. Health Monit. 2018, 17, 577–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ebrahimkhanlou, A.; Dubuc, B.; Salamone, S. Damage localization in metallic plate structures using edge-reflected lamb waves. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 085035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Qiu, L.; Yuan, S.; Bao, Q.; Mei, H.; Ren, Y. Crack propagation monitoring in a full-scale aircraft fatigue test based on guided wave-Gaussian mixture model. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 055048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dziendzikowski, M.; Kurnyta, A.; Dragan, K.; Klysz, S.; Leski, A. In situ Barely Visible Impact Damage detection and localization for composite structures using surface mounted and embedded PZT transducers: A comparative study. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2016, 78, 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shen, Y.; Cesnik, C.E. Hybrid local FEM/global LISA modeling of damped guided wave propagation in complex composite structures. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 095021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hong, X.; Liu, Y.; Liufu, Y.; Lin, P. Debonding Detection in Hidden Frame Supported Glass Curtain Walls Using the Nonlinear Ultrasonic Modulation Method with Piezoceramic Transducers. Sensors 2018, 18, 2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dziendzikowski, M.; Niedbala, P.; Kurnyta, A.; Kowalczyk, K.; Dragan, K. Structural Health Monitoring of a Composite Panel Based on PZT Sensors and a Transfer Impedance Framework. Sensors 2018, 18, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, L.; Giurgiutiu, V. In situ 2-D piezoelectric wafer active sensors arrays for guided wave damage detection. Ultrasonics 2008, 48, 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ostachowicz, W.; Kudela, P.; Malinowski, P.; Wandowski, T. Damage localisation in plate-like structures based on PZT sensors. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2009, 23, 1805–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, X.; Royer, R.L.; Owens, S.E.; Rose, J.L. Ultrasonic Lamb wave tomography in structural health monitoring. Smart Mater. Struct. 2011, 20, 105002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, D.; Zhang, W.; Wang, X.; Sun, B. Lamb-wave-based tomographic imaging techniques for hole-edge corrosion monitoring in plate structures. Materials 2016, 9, 916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rao, J.; Ratassepp, M.; Lisevych, D.; Hamzah Caffoor, M.; Fan, Z. On-Line Corrosion Monitoring of Plate Structures Based on Guided Wave Tomography Using Piezoelectric Sensors. Sensors 2017, 17, 2882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cai, J.; Shi, L.; Yuan, S.; Shao, Z. High spatial resolution imaging for structural health monitoring based on virtual time reversal. Smart Mater. Struct. 2011, 20, 055018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lu, G.; Li, Y.; Wang, T.; Xiao, H.; Huo, L.; Song, G. A multi-delay-and-sum imaging algorithm for damage detection using piezoceramic transducers. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2017, 28, 1150–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cai, J.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Z. A signal domain transform method for spatial resolution improvement of Lamb wave signals with synthetically measured relative wavenumber curves. Struct. Health Monit. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, C.H.; Rose, J.T.; Chang, F.K. A synthetic time-reversal imaging method for structural health monitoring. Smart Mater. Struct. 2004, 13, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Agrahari, J.K.; Kapuria, S. A refined Lamb wave time-reversal method with enhanced sensitivity for damage detection in isotropic plates. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2016, 27, 1283–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zeng, L.; Lin, J.; Huang, L. A modified Lamb wave time-reversal method for health monitoring of composite structures. Sensors 2017, 17, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Quaegebeur, N.; Ostiguy, P.C.; Masson, P. Correlation-based imaging technique for fatigue monitoring of riveted lap-joint structure. Smart Mater. Struct. 2014, 23, 055007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, J.; Yuan, F.G. Lamb-wave-based two-dimensional areal scan damage imaging using reverse-time migration with a normalized zero-lag cross-correlation imaging condition. Struct. Health Monit. 2017, 16, 444–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Su, Z.; Cheng, L.; Wang, X.; Yu, L.; Zhou, C. Predicting delamination of composite laminates using an imaging approach. Smart Mater. Struct. 2009, 18, 074002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, C.; Su, Z.; Cheng, L. Quantitative evaluation of orientation-specific damage using elastic waves and probability-based diagnostic imaging. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2011, 25, 2135–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wu, Z.; Liu, K.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, Y. Validation and evaluation of damage identification using probability-based diagnostic imaging on a stiffened composite panel. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2015, 26, 2181–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hall, J.S.; Michaels, J.E. Minimum variance ultrasonic imaging applied to an in situ sparse guided wave array. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Frequency Control 2010, 57, 2311–2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hall, J.S.; Fromme, P.; Michaels, J.E. Guided wave damage characterization via minimum variance imaging with a distributed array of ultrasonic sensors. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 2014, 33, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hua, J.; Lin, J.; Zeng, L.; Luo, Z. Minimum variance imaging based on correlation analysis of Lamb wave signals. Ultrasonics 2016, 70, 107–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kudela, P.; Radzienski, M.; Ostachowicz, W.; Yang, Z. Structural health monitoring system based on a concept of Lamb wave focusing by the piezoelectric array. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2018, 108, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xu, C.B.; Yang, Z.B.; Zhai, Z.; Qiao, B.J.; Tian, S.H.; Chen, X.F. A weighted sparse reconstruction-based ultrasonic guided wave anomaly imaging method for composite laminates. Compos. Struct. 2018, 209, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Staszewski, W.J.; Mahzan, S.; Traynor, R. Health monitoring of aerospace composite structures–Active and passive approach. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2009, 69, 1678–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ruzzene, M. Frequency–wavenumber domain filtering for improved damage visualization. Smart Mater. Struct. 2007, 16, 2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Michaels, T.E.; Michaels, J.E.; Ruzzene, M. Frequency–wavenumber domain analysis of guided wavefields. Ultrasonics 2011, 51, 452–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tian, Z.; Yu, L. Lamb wave frequency–wavenumber analysis and decomposition. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2014, 25, 1107–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, Z.; Chen, H.; Sun, K.; He, C.; Wu, B. Full non-contact laser-based Lamb waves phased array inspection of aluminum plate. J. Vis. 2018, 21, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sohn, H.; Dutta, D.; Yang, J.Y.; Park, H.J.; DeSimio, M.; Olson, S.; Swenson, E. Delamination detection in composites through guided wave field image processing. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011, 71, 1250–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. An, Y.K.; Park, B.; Sohn, H. Complete noncontact laser ultrasonic imaging for automated crack visualization in a plate. Smart Mater. Struct. 2013, 22, 025022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Park, B.; An, Y.K.; Sohn, H. Visualization of hidden delamination and debonding in composites through noncontact laser ultrasonic scanning. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 100, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. He, J.; Yuan, F.G. A quantitative damage imaging technique based on enhanced CCRTM for composite plates using 2D scan. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 105022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Girolamo, D.; Chang, H.Y.; Yuan, F.G. Impact damage visualization in a honeycomb composite panel through laser inspection using zero-lag cross-correlation imaging condition. Ultrasonics 2018, 87, 152–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rogge, M.D.; Leckey, C.A. Characterization of impact damage in composite laminates using guided wavefield imaging and local wavenumber domain analysis. Ultrasonics 2013, 53, 1217–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Tian, Z.; Yu, L.; Leckey, C.; Seebo, J. Guided wave imaging for detection and evaluation of impact-induced delamination in composites. Smart Mater. Struct. 2015, 24, 105019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tian, Z.; Yu, L.; Leckey, C. Delamination detection and quantification on laminated composite structures with Lamb waves and wavenumber analysis. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2015, 26, 1723–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kudela, P.; Radzieński, M.; Ostachowicz, W. Identification of cracks in thin-walled structures by means of wavenumber filtering. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2015, 50, 456–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. De Marchi, L.; Marzani, A.; Moll, J.; Kudela, P.; Radzieński, M.; Ostachowicz, W. A pulse coding and decoding strategy to perform Lamb wave inspections using simultaneously multiple actuators. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2017, 91, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kudela, P.; Radzienski, M.; Ostachowicz, W. Impact induced damage assessment by means of Lamb wave image processing. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2018, 102, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Newnham, R.E.; Xu, Q.C.; Kumar, S.; Cross, L.E. Smart ceramics. Ferroelectrics 1990, 102, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. APC 850 Materials Data Sheet. Available online: http://www.americanpiezo.com (accessed on 10 October 2018).
  67. Herbiet, R.; Robels, U.; Dederichs, H.; Arlt, G. Domain wall and volume contributions to material properties of PZT ceramics. Ferroelectrics 1989, 98, 107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xu, F.; Trolier-McKinstry, S.; Ren, W.; Xu, B.; Xie, Z.L.; Hemker, K.J. Domain wall motion and its contribution to the dielectric and piezoelectric properties of lead zirconate titanate films. J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 89, 1336–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, Q.M.; Wang, H.; Kim, N.; Cross, L.E. Direct evaluation of domain-wall and intrinsic contributions to the dielectric and piezoelectric response and their temperature dependence on lead zirconate-titanate ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 75, 454–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Faisal Haider, M.; Migot, A.; Bhuiyan, M.; Giurgiutiu, V. Experimental Investigation of Impact Localization in Composite Plate Using Newly Developed Imaging Method. Inventions 2018, 3, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Migot, A.; Bhuiyan, Y.; Giurgiutiu, V. Numerical and experimental investigation of damage severity estimation using Lamb wave–based imaging methods. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mei, H.; Giurgiutiu, V. Guided wave excitation and propagation in damped composite plates. Struct. Health Monit. Int. J. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Giurgiutiu, V. Predictive simulation of guide wave structural health monitoring in metallic and composite structures. In Proceedings of the 9th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring EWSHM 2018, Manchester, UK, 10–13 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
  74. Glushkov, E.; Glushkova, N.; Eremin, A.; Lammering, R. Group velocity of cylindrical guided waves in anisotropic laminate composites. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2014, 135, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sensors 19 00383 g001 550
Figure 1. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) spectrum of the lead zirconate titanate (PZT) piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWAS).
Figure 1. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) spectrum of the lead zirconate titanate (PZT) piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWAS).
Sensors 19 00383 g001
Sensors 19 00383 g002 550
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the cross-section of PZT-PWAS: (a) at room temperature; (b) after exposure to 250 °C temperature; (c) after exposure to 225 kGy nuclear radiation.
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the cross-section of PZT-PWAS: (a) at room temperature; (b) after exposure to 250 °C temperature; (c) after exposure to 225 kGy nuclear radiation.
Sensors 19 00383 g002
Sensors 19 00383 g003 550
Figure 3. Experimental setup: (a) a circular PWAS; (b) corrosion damage; (c) schematic of the corrosion damage.
Figure 3. Experimental setup: (a) a circular PWAS; (b) corrosion damage; (c) schematic of the corrosion damage.
Sensors 19 00383 g003
Sensors 19 00383 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic of an experimental setup using PWAS and scanning laser Doppler vibrometer (SLDV) for damage detection.
Figure 4. Schematic of an experimental setup using PWAS and scanning laser Doppler vibrometer (SLDV) for damage detection.
Sensors 19 00383 g004
Sensors 19 00383 g005 550
Figure 5. SLDV line scan for a 2.032-mm 2024-T3 aluminum plate: (a) schematic of the SLDV line scan; (b) time–space wavefield at 200 kHz; (c) frequency–wavenumber dispersion curves.
Figure 5. SLDV line scan for a 2.032-mm 2024-T3 aluminum plate: (a) schematic of the SLDV line scan; (b) time–space wavefield at 200 kHz; (c) frequency–wavenumber dispersion curves.
Sensors 19 00383 g005
Sensors 19 00383 g006 550
Figure 6. Spatial wavefield in the aluminum plate with simulated corrosion damage, showing S0 mode and A0 mode waves interacting with the corrosion damage.
Figure 6. Spatial wavefield in the aluminum plate with simulated corrosion damage, showing S0 mode and A0 mode waves interacting with the corrosion damage.
Sensors 19 00383 g006
Sensors 19 00383 g007 550
Figure 7. 200 kHz signals of the damaged plate at locations #1 through #4, shown in Figure 4.
Figure 7. 200 kHz signals of the damaged plate at locations #1 through #4, shown in Figure 4.
Sensors 19 00383 g007
Sensors 19 00383 g008 550
Figure 8. Experimental setup for the SLDV to measure the out-of-plane velocity of the scattered wavefields.
Figure 8. Experimental setup for the SLDV to measure the out-of-plane velocity of the scattered wavefields.
Sensors 19 00383 g008
Sensors 19 00383 g009 550
Figure 9. Experimentally measured scattered wavefields using SLDV: (a) scan schematic; (b) incident wave and (c) reflected and transmitted waves from pristine stiffener; (d) incident wave, and (e) reflected and transmitted waves from the cracked stiffener.
Figure 9. Experimentally measured scattered wavefields using SLDV: (a) scan schematic; (b) incident wave and (c) reflected and transmitted waves from pristine stiffener; (d) incident wave, and (e) reflected and transmitted waves from the cracked stiffener.
Sensors 19 00383 g009
Sensors 19 00383 g010a 550Sensors 19 00383 g010b 550
Figure 10. (a) Schematic diagram of the sensing locations; (b) incident and reflected Lamb waves from pristine stiffener; (c) transmitted Lamb waves from the pristine stiffener; (d) incident and reflected Lamb waves from cracked stiffener; (e) transmitted Lamb waves from cracked stiffener.
Figure 10. (a) Schematic diagram of the sensing locations; (b) incident and reflected Lamb waves from pristine stiffener; (c) transmitted Lamb waves from the pristine stiffener; (d) incident and reflected Lamb waves from cracked stiffener; (e) transmitted Lamb waves from cracked stiffener.
Sensors 19 00383 g010aSensors 19 00383 g010b
Sensors 19 00383 g011 550
Figure 11. FFT of the incident and scattered Lamb waves: (a) pristine stiffener; (b) cracked stiffener.
Figure 11. FFT of the incident and scattered Lamb waves: (a) pristine stiffener; (b) cracked stiffener.
Sensors 19 00383 g011
Sensors 19 00383 g012 550
Figure 12. Schematic of a 1.6 mm cross-ply carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite plate with circular delamination by inserting Teflon.
Figure 12. Schematic of a 1.6 mm cross-ply carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite plate with circular delamination by inserting Teflon.
Sensors 19 00383 g012
Sensors 19 00383 g013 550
Figure 13. Experimental setup on the 1.6 mm cross-ply composite plate.
Figure 13. Experimental setup on the 1.6 mm cross-ply composite plate.
Sensors 19 00383 g013
Sensors 19 00383 g014 550
Figure 14. Experimental tuning curves of the cross-ply CFRP composite plate in the: (a) 0° directions; (b) 45° direction.
Figure 14. Experimental tuning curves of the cross-ply CFRP composite plate in the: (a) 0° directions; (b) 45° direction.
Sensors 19 00383 g014
Sensors 19 00383 g015 550
Figure 15. The new methodology for the localization of damage point: (a) pulse-echo signals of the sensing paths S2-S2, S4-S4, S5-S5, and S7-S7; (b) determining the location of damage.
Figure 15. The new methodology for the localization of damage point: (a) pulse-echo signals of the sensing paths S2-S2, S4-S4, S5-S5, and S7-S7; (b) determining the location of damage.
Sensors 19 00383 g015
Sensors 19 00383 g016 550
Figure 16. Comparison between the pristine signal and the delamination signal (Scattered S0 is overlapped with incident waves).
Figure 16. Comparison between the pristine signal and the delamination signal (Scattered S0 is overlapped with incident waves).
Sensors 19 00383 g016
Sensors 19 00383 g017 550
Figure 17. Group velocity directivity curves at 330 kHz in a 1.6 mm cross-ply CFRP plate.
Figure 17. Group velocity directivity curves at 330 kHz in a 1.6 mm cross-ply CFRP plate.
Sensors 19 00383 g017
Sensors 19 00383 g018 550
Figure 18. Damage orbit with the transmitter and receiver PWAS as foci.
Figure 18. Damage orbit with the transmitter and receiver PWAS as foci.
Sensors 19 00383 g018
Sensors 19 00383 g019 550
Figure 19. The imaging result of the 50 mm delamination in the cross-ply composite plate.
Figure 19. The imaging result of the 50 mm delamination in the cross-ply composite plate.
Sensors 19 00383 g019
Sensors 19 00383 g020 550
Figure 20. Experimental setup for capturing AE signals during the fatigue crack event.
Figure 20. Experimental setup for capturing AE signals during the fatigue crack event.
Sensors 19 00383 g020
Sensors 19 00383 g021 550
Figure 21. The initial tip-to-tip crack length was approximately 14 mm. After 2000 fatigue cycles, an advancement in the crack length of 2 mm was observed.
Figure 21. The initial tip-to-tip crack length was approximately 14 mm. After 2000 fatigue cycles, an advancement in the crack length of 2 mm was observed.
Sensors 19 00383 g021
Sensors 19 00383 g022 550
Figure 22. Signals captured by the PWAS 1 and S9225 1 sensors, due to a particular AE event at the crack.
Figure 22. Signals captured by the PWAS 1 and S9225 1 sensors, due to a particular AE event at the crack.
Sensors 19 00383 g022
Sensors 19 00383 g023 550
Figure 23. Typical AE signals captured during fatigue crack growth. Three sets of captured signals are presented. For each set, the signal at PWAS 1 and the corresponding signal at PWAS 2 are presented. The AE signals seem to maintain their signature at PWAS 1 and 2.
Figure 23. Typical AE signals captured during fatigue crack growth. Three sets of captured signals are presented. For each set, the signal at PWAS 1 and the corresponding signal at PWAS 2 are presented. The AE signals seem to maintain their signature at PWAS 1 and 2.
Sensors 19 00383 g023
Table
Table 1. Material properties of 2024-T3 aluminum.
Table 1. Material properties of 2024-T3 aluminum.
Young’s Modulus (E)Poisson’s Ratio (υ)Density (ρ)
73.1 GPa0.332780 kg/m3
Table
Table 2. Engineering constants of the unidirectional prepreg.
Table 2. Engineering constants of the unidirectional prepreg.
E11E22E33ν12ν13ν23G12G13G23ρ
140.8 GPa11.3 GPa11.3 GPa0.310.310.55.7 GPa5.7 GPa3.4 GPa1640 kg/m3
Table
Table 3. Sequence of arrival and amplitude of the AE signals at PWAS 1 and PWAS 2.
Table 3. Sequence of arrival and amplitude of the AE signals at PWAS 1 and PWAS 2.
Signal #Sequence of ArrivalAmplitude of Signal (dB)
PWAS 1PWAS 2PWAS 1PWAS 2
1126251
2125949
3125848

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mei, H.; Haider, M.F.; Joseph, R.; Migot, A.; Giurgiutiu, V. Recent Advances in Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring Applications. Sensors 2019, 19, 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19020383

AMA Style

Mei H, Haider MF, Joseph R, Migot A, Giurgiutiu V. Recent Advances in Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring Applications. Sensors. 2019; 19(2):383. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19020383

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mei, Hanfei, Mohammad Faisal Haider, Roshan Joseph, Asaad Migot, and Victor Giurgiutiu. 2019. "Recent Advances in Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring Applications" Sensors 19, no. 2: 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19020383

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop