Next Article in Journal
Development of Standardized Fetal Progenitor Cell Therapy for Cartilage Regenerative Medicine: Industrial Transposition and Preliminary Safety in Xenogeneic Transplantation
Previous Article in Journal
Profiles of Secondary Metabolites (Phenolic Acids, Carotenoids, Anthocyanins, and Galantamine) and Primary Metabolites (Carbohydrates, Amino Acids, and Organic Acids) during Flower Development in Lycoris radiata
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/biom11020249
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Control of Gene Expression by Exosome-Derived Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis

by
Valeria Arcucci
1,2,
Steven A. Stacker
1,2,3 and
Marc G. Achen
4,5,*
1
Tumour Angiogenesis and Microenvironment Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St., Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia
2
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3010, Australia
3
Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3050, Australia
4
O’Brien Institute Department, St Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research, 9 Princes Street, Fitzroy VIC 3065, Australia
5
Department of Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy VIC 3065, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2021, 11(2), 249; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11020249
Submission received: 24 December 2020 / Revised: 29 January 2021 / Accepted: 4 February 2021 / Published: 9 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tumour angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis are hallmarks of cancer and have been associated with tumour progression, tumour metastasis and poor patient prognosis. Many factors regulate angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in cancer including non-coding RNAs which are a category of RNAs that do not encode proteins and have important regulatory functions at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Non-coding RNAs can be encapsulated in extracellular vesicles called exosomes which are secreted by tumour cells or other cells in the tumour microenvironment and can then be taken up by the endothelial cells of blood vessels and lymphatic vessels. The “delivery” of these non-coding RNAs to endothelial cells in tumours can facilitate tumour angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Here we review recent findings about exosomal non-coding RNAs, specifically microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs, which regulate tumour angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in cancer. We then focus on the potential use of these molecules as cancer biomarkers and opportunities for exploiting ncRNAs for the treatment of cancer.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The growth of new tumour blood vessels and lymphatic vessels is a key element of cancer progression having a close association with metastatic spread, poor patient prognosis and survival [1,2]. Tumour angiogenesis is a well-established target for anti-cancer therapeutics through targeting of growth factors, their cell surface receptors and associated signalling pathways [3], however, tumour lymphangiogenesis is yet to be clinically validated as a therapeutic target. A deeper knowledge of the array of molecular mechanisms controlling tumour angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis will be central to development of novel therapeutics for targeting these processes in cancer.
Previous work has shown that a range of growth factors, cell surface receptors and a multitude of signalling molecules drives the remodelling of the blood and lymphatic vasculatures in cancer [2,4]. Recent research has identified important roles for non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) in regulating key aspects of cancer biology, including tumour angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. ncRNAs are a class of RNA molecules which do not encode proteins; they are classified as “small” (<200 nucleotides) or “long” (>200 nucleotides) based uniquely on their length [5]. The most studied type of small ncRNAs are microRNAs (miRNAs) which, together with long ncRNAs, are the primary focus of this review. miRNAs are small RNA molecules which mediate post-transcriptional regulation by targeting mRNAs leading to decreased gene expression (i.e., gene silencing) via mRNA degradation and/or translational repression. Nuclear miRNAs have been shown to play a role in the regulation of transcription by recruiting transcriptional activator and repressor chromatin remodelling proteins (Figure 1) [6,7]. Importantly, different miRNAs can work cooperatively in miRNA clusters to convergently target expression of the same or multiple genes in related molecular pathways [8].
Long ncRNAs (lncRNAs) exhibit a range of different regulatory functions in distinct cellular compartments [5] (Figure 1). They can bind RNA, DNA and proteins, and regulate gene expression at several different levels. They act as transcriptional regulators by recruiting transcriptional activators or suppressors [17,18] or by recruiting chromatin remodelling proteins, thereby favouring epigenetic control of gene expression [19]. lncRNAs can also regulate gene expression at a post-transcriptional level by recruiting proteins to degrade mRNAs [20], modulating splicing of mRNAs [21] or acting as decoys for proteins involved in mRNA degradation [22]. lncRNAs can also regulate miRNA function: some lncRNAs act as competing endogenous RNAs which sequester multiple miRNAs thereby inhibiting their action leading to de-repression of certain mRNA targets [23].
An important functional feature of miRNAs and lncRNAs is that they can exert effects on the regulation of complex biological responses: miRNAs by targeting mRNAs encoding multiple proteins involved in the same or a related molecular pathway, lncRNAs by controlling the remodelling of chromatin to modulate gene expression, or by targeting miRNAs. Moreover, a miRNA can act in concert with other miRNAs, lncRNAs or transcription factors to mediate gene silencing in a precise manner.
It has recently been shown that ncRNAs can be encapsulated in extracellular vesicles called exosomes and thus take on a pivotal role in cell-to-cell communication which occurs in the tumour microenvironment and ultimately contributes to tumour progression, remodelling of blood vessels and lymphatics, and tumour spread [24,25]. In this review, we summarise recent discoveries about ncRNAs, both miRNAs and lncRNAs, which are secreted by cancer cells in exosomes and which then facilitate tumour angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Further, we discuss the use of these tumour-derived exosomal ncRNAs as tumour biomarkers, and the potential of exploiting ncRNAs for treating cancer.

2. Tumour Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis

2.1. Tumour Angiogenesis

Tumour cells require oxygen and nutrients to proliferate, and solid tumours therefore require blood vessels to facilitate their growth and spread [26]. Tumour cells and other cells belonging to the tumour microenvironment can secrete angiogenic signalling molecules that trigger the so called “angiogenic switch” which is the transition from a non-vascular to a vascularised tumour phenotype [1]. The formation of blood vessels in tumours occurs through several different processes: new capillaries can sprout from pre-existing ones (sprouting angiogenesis) [27], a new vessel can form to connect two pre-existing vessels or new blood vessels can form de novo from endothelial progenitor cells or cancer stem cells in a process called vasculogenesis [28]. Tumour blood vessels appear chaotic and disorganised, having endothelial cell junctions which are often disrupted, leading to increased vascular permeability and interstitial fluid pressure. This can reduce the efficacy of cancer therapy since compression of tumour vessels inhibits drug delivery [29]. Several angiogenic factors, produced by tumour cells and/or other cells in the tumour microenvironment, promote tumour angiogenesis and will be described in the last part of this section.

2.2. Tumour Lymphangiogenesis

Lymphatic vessels can undergo multiple changes in cancer which facilitate the spread of tumour cells to organs distant from the primary tumour, such as lymphangiogenesis and other forms of lymphatic remodelling [2]. Lymphangiogenesis, the formation of new lymphatic vessels from the pre-existing lymphatic vascular network, involves proliferation, sprouting and migration of lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) to form new tumoural lymphatic vessels. Tumour lymphangiogenesis correlates with the spread of tumour cells to lymph nodes in mice [30,31,32]. An alternative form of lymphatic remodelling, lymphatic enlargement, occurs in the large collecting lymphatic vessels and involves morphological changes that lead to the dilation of these vessels which is associated with increased lymph node metastasis [33,34,35].
The remodelling of the lymphatic vasculature in cancer is driven by a diverse range of growth factors that are produced by tumour cells and cells in the tumour microenvironment. These growth factors bind cognate receptors on LECs and activate several molecular pathways that ultimately drive lymphangiogenesis; they are described below.

2.3. Molecular Regulation of Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis in Cancer

2.3.1. VEGF Signalling Pathways in Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis

Some members of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family of secreted proteins are inducers of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in cancer. The human VEGF family is composed of VEGFA, VEGFB, VEGFC, VEGFD and placenta growth factor (PIGF). These growth factors bind and activate cognate receptors VEGFR1, VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 with different affinities [36,37,38,39,40,41]. VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 are mainly expressed on endothelial cells [42] while VEGFR1, which is also expressed on endothelial cells, has in addition been shown to be expressed on macrophages and to regulate their migration [43].
The VEGFC-VEGFR3 and VEGFD-VEGFR3 signalling pathways have been the most studied in lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic vessel remodelling in cancer and are considered major drivers of these processes [2]. In a tumour context, the lymphangiogenic growth factors VEGFC and VEGFD are produced by a variety of cell types including tumour cells, stromal cells, tumour-infiltrating macrophages and activated platelets [44,45]. Binding of VEGFC and VEGFD to VEGFR3 on LECs causes receptor homodimerization and autophosphorylation, leading to the activation of downstream lymphangiogenic signalling involving the RAS-MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways [46].
VEGFA is secreted by tumour cells and stroma and is the most studied inducer of tumour angiogenesis; its presence is correlated with tumour size, blood vessel density and metastasis [47]. VEGFA is upregulated in hypoxic conditions, which are a hallmark of most solid tumours [48], and is thought to act mainly by activating VEGFR2 on the surface of blood vascular endothelial cells (BECs) [47].

2.3.2. Other Signalling Pathways

Besides the VEGFs, other growth factors and signalling pathways have been reported to stimulate lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis. Angiopoietins 1 and 2 (ANGPT1 and ANGPT2) and their receptors (TIE1 and TIE2) on endothelial cells are required for both these processes [49]. Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), a member of the FGF family [50], and platelet-derived growth factor B [51] have been proposed to exhibit lymphangiogenic activity. Several other factors may also play a role in tumour lymphangiogenesis such as Hepatocyte growth factor [52], Insulin-like growth factors [53], Epidermal growth factor [54] and Transforming growth factor β [55]. In terms of angiogenic signalling, members of the Eph/ephrin transmembrane protein families have been shown to promote tumour angiogenesis, as well as tumour progression, and to impair anti-angiogenic therapies [56].
Lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis in tumours involve complex regulation by stimulatory molecules which modulate interacting signalling pathways to induce endothelial cell proliferation, sprouting, migration and eventually formation of new vessels from the pre-existing network. It is clear from the literature that the proteins which are best validated as lymphangiogenic factors in vivo, acting directly on LEC, are VEGFC and VEGFD. Likewise, VEGFA is the best validated angiogenic factor in cancer. These conclusions are based on many mouse genetic models, tumour xenograft models and clinicopathological studies [2,4,57].

3. Role of Exosome-Derived Non-Coding RNAs in Tumour Lymphangiogenesis and Angiogenesis

Recently, miRNAs and lncRNAs have been found in exosomes in cancer (Figure 2). Exosomes are extracellular vesicles with diameters ranging from 30 to 150 nm which, in a tumour setting, can be secreted by tumour cells or immune or mesenchymal cells in the tumour microenvironment [58]. Specific ncRNAs are packaged in exosomes based on the presence of particular sequence motifs or structural configurations in these RNA molecules or interactions with certain RNA-binding proteins [59]. Uptake of exosomes by different cell types can be both selective (receptor-ligand interaction) and non-specific [60]; endothelial cells have been shown to uptake exosomes via receptor-mediated endocytosis [61]. miRNAs and lncRNAs in cancer-derived exosomes facilitate cell-cell communication which, in turn, can stimulate tumour growth, invasion, angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, metastasis and the reprogramming of the tumour microenvironment to favour tumour growth [62,63].

3.1. Role of Exosomal MiRNAs

Exosomal miRNAs are capable of regulating lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis within the primary tumour and at metastatic sites (Table 1). Within a tumour, most exosomal miRNAs are considered to be produced by tumour cells and, when internalised by endothelial cells, some of these miRNAs can stimulate angiogenesis and/or lymphangiogenesis by repressing the expression of proteins that inhibit the main pathways that drive these processes [64,65,66]. Exosomal miRNAs have been shown to down-regulate several anti-angiogenic transcription factors in endothelial cells, and thereby initiate the angiogenic switch [24,67,68], or to repress inhibitors of the expression of VEGFA, a key inducer of angiogenesis. For instance, in gastric carcinoma, exosomal miR-155 and miR-130a, secreted by gastric cancer cells, have been shown in two studies to repress expression of the transcription factor c-MYB and thereby indirectly promote the expression of VEGFA [69,70]. Another example of exosomal miRNAs controlling key transcription factors to promote angiogenesis was reported by Mao and colleagues, who showed that exosomal miR-141 secreted by small-cell lung cancer cells downregulates the expression of the transcription factor KLF12 in endothelial cells thereby promoting angiogenesis in vivo [24]. Moreover, Ba and colleagues demonstrated that gastric cancer cells secrete exosomes containing miR-155 which stimulated the remodelling of blood vessels in vivo by targeting the anti-angiogenic transcription factor Forkhead box O3 (FOXO3a) [68].
Several research groups have also shown that tumour cells can secrete exosomal miRNAs which influence non-endothelial cell types in the tumour microenvironment such as fibroblasts and macrophages so they can, in turn, promote tumour angiogenesis and/or lymphangiogenesis. For instance, Fan and colleagues have shown that exosomal miR-210 derived from lung cancer cells induces the reprogramming of normal fibroblasts into cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) by activating the JAK2/STAT3 pathway in these cells. Reprogrammed fibroblasts then upregulate the expression of several angiogenic factors, including VEGFA, which stimulate the remodelling of tumoural blood vessels [76]. Another example of tumour cells reprogramming non-endothelial cells in the tumour microenvironment was provided by two research groups in 2018 demonstrating changes in macrophages induced by cancer-derived exosomes. Specifically, Wang and colleagues showed that hypoxic pancreatic cancer cells secrete exosomes containing miR-301a which induced M2 polarization of macrophages by activating the PTEN/PI3Kgamma signalling pathway in these cells [74]. Furthermore, Yang and colleagues demonstrated that head and neck cancer cells promote M2 polarisation of macrophages by delivering miR-21-enriched exosomes to these cells which target mRNAs for a subunit of interleukin-12 (IL12A] and PDCD4, a protein involved in the initiation of protein translation [77]. M2 macrophages are considered activated tumour-associated macrophages and are known to produce inflammatory signals and express high levels of growth factors that stimulate angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, such as VEGFA and VEGFC [78].
In specific tumour settings, cells of the tumour microenvironment, including endothelial cells, can secrete exosomes that target tumour cells or other cell types and thereby indirectly regulate tumour angiogenesis. For instance, mesenchymal stem cells secrete exosomes containing miR-100 which inhibits angiogenesis by modulating the mTOR/HIF-1α/VEGFA signalling axis in breast cancer cells, thus reducing production of VEGFA by these cells [79]. Exosomal miR-126 has been shown to be secreted by chemotherapy-stimulated myeloid-derived suppressor cells, a heterogeneous population of cells which proliferates in response to the treatment of cancer with chemotherapy [80], and that has a strong ability to suppress T-cell responses [81]. miR-126-enriched exosomes target T2 helper immune cells and endothelial cells to promote both an inflammatory milieu and tumour angiogenesis in breast cancer mouse xenograft models [82].

3.2. Role of Exosomal LncRNAs

Recently, lncRNAs have been shown to be involved in cell-to-cell communication in the context of tumour angiogenesis [83]. lncRNAs can be packaged and secreted in exosomes, predominantly by tumour cells, and target the endothelium of blood vessels leading to the induction of angiogenesis [84,85]. Exosomal lncRNAs which have been internalised into the endothelial cells of blood vessels seem to regulate angiogenesis by behaving as competing endogenous RNAs, i.e., by binding endogenous miRNAs and preventing their function in BECs thereby derepressing expression of their targets involved in angiogenic signalling (Table 2). An example is UCA1 lncRNA which is secreted in exosomes by pancreatic cancer cells in hypoxic conditions and internalised by BECs. This lncRNA has been shown to sponge miR-206 in the blood vessel endothelium derepressing expression of its target AMOTL2 thereby activating the ERK1/ERK2 axis which is crucial for signal transduction downstream of VEGFA [16]. AMOTL2 belongs to the angiomotin family of membrane-associated scaffold proteins, and has been shown to play a significant role in the proliferation, tube formation and migration of endothelial cells via positively regulating the MAPK/ERK1/2 signalling pathway [86]. The derepression of AMOTL2 expression led to remodelling of BECs, angiogenesis and tumour growth in a mouse xenograft model of pancreatic cancer [25].
FAM225A lncRNA has been shown to promote oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) progression and angiogenesis by sponging miR-206 in BECs. Specifically, OSCC cells secrete high levels of exosomal FAM225A which can then be endocytosed by BECs wherein this lncRNA inhibits miR-206 leading to upregulation of the expression of miR-206 targets [87]. These include the angiogenic transcription factor FOXP1 and the transmembrane protein NETO2 which has been previously shown to activate the PI3K/Akt/NF-κB/Snail axis, and thus drive tumour progression, in the setting of gastric cancer [104]. As a result of the sponging of miR-206, FAM225A promotes angiogenesis and OSCC progression in vivo [87].
Another example of how exosomal lncRNAs regulate tumour angiogenesis is that chondrosarcoma cell-derived exosomes carry lncRNA RAMP2-AS1 which is delivered to BECs. Here, RAMP2-AS1 acts as a competing endogenous RNA by sponging miR-2355-5p thereby upregulating the expression of one of its targets, the VEGFA receptor VEGFR2, leading to activation of angiogenic signalling [88].
Some lncRNAs have been shown to directly upregulate the expression of VEGFA in endothelial cells thereby promoting angiogenesis. For example, it has been shown that exosomal lncRNA Hotair, produced by glioma cells, upregulates the expression of VEGFA in brain microvascular endothelial cells and thus stimulates their remodelling [84].

4. Relevance of Tumour-Derived Exosomal Non-Coding RNAs for Cancer Biomarkers and Therapeutic Interventions

4.1. Non-Coding RNAs as Cancer Biomarkers

Tumour-derived exosomes are found in a variety of body fluids including blood, tears, urine, milk, saliva and ascites [105], and the encapsulation of ncRNAs in these exosomes can help maintain their integrity in body fluids by protecting them from RNAses. Hence the analysis of tumour-derived exosomal ncRNAs is readily applicable for liquid biopsy. Liquid biopsy is the analysis of tumour biomarkers present in non-solid biological samples, primarily blood. Liquid biopsy, as opposed to traditional solid biopsy, has been increasingly used as a non-invasive diagnostic and molecular phenotyping tool to detect and diagnose tumours and provide information prior to treatment [106]. Liquid biopsy can also be used to monitor tumour evolution [107]. The ideal panel of tumour biomarkers for liquid biopsy must be able to identify the tumour type, its stage and, ideally, the best therapeutic treatment. Thanks to their specificity of sequence and function, and ability to withstand the relatively harsh conditions in the tumour microenvironment and circulation, cancer-derived exosomal ncRNAs in blood have the potential to meet these expectations [108]. An example of the use of ncRNAs in cancer diagnostics is provided by the company MiRXES (Singapore) which has developed a qPCR-based diagnostic test currently used for diagnosis of gastric cancer; the test analyses the levels of 12 microRNA biomarkers linked to gastric cancer and calculates a cancer risk score for each patient using an algorithm that has been clinically validated (https://mirxes.com/gastroclear/ (accessed on 9 February 2021)) [109].
We envisage a scenario in which cancer-derived exosomal ncRNAs that promote tumour angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis (such as those discussed in previous sections of this article) are included in panels of ncRNA biomarkers for liquid biopsy to detect and stage cancers in the clinic. The purpose of monitoring ncRNAs that promote angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis would be to provide information about the propensity of detected tumours to metastasize, via blood vessels or lymphatics, to distant sites in the body which is the most lethal aspect of cancer for most patients. We acknowledge there is considerable work that still needs to be done to clinically validate specific exosomal ncRNAs as biomarkers of cancer metastasis.

4.2. Non-Coding RNAs and Therapeutics

In this article we have focussed on ncRNAs which promote angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis and metastasis in cancer. In contrast, there are a range of ncRNAs which are known to be anti-angiogenic or anti-lymphangiogenic and could therefore form the basis of therapeutic strategies to restrict tumour growth and spread [15,110,111]. Such ncRNAs could be packaged in liposomes and delivered to patients, via injection, to restrict tumour angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, and thereby inhibit metastatic spread. This strategy is speculative at this time, however, the potential feasibility of delivering synthetic ncRNAs in vivo is illustrated by the approach of using lipid-nanoparticle formulated, nucleoside-modified synthetic RNA in the clinic for immunization to combat coronaviruses such as SARS-CoV-2, as exemplified by the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine [112].
There are a range of non-cancer clinical settings in which it could be beneficial to promote angiogenesis and/or lymphangiogenesis such as wound healing, cardiovascular diseases and lymphoedema. ncRNAs which promote angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, such as those discussed in this article, could be exploited for these purposes by employing lipid-nanoparticle formulated, nucleoside-modified synthetic RNA. The potential of such a strategy has been exemplified by recent animal studies in which lymphangiogenesis was successfully stimulated in a therapeutic setting by delivering exosomal miRNAs, derived from adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), to LECs. ADSCs are multipotent cells located in adipose tissue that have been used in therapeutic settings [113] because of their stability in different tissue environments and their capacity to secrete growth factors and exosomes [114]. Wang and colleagues have shown that ADSCs treated with VEGFC produce high levels of exosomal miR-132 which in turn promoted the remodelling of LECs [71]. Furthermore, An and colleagues showed that ADSCs naturally secrete high levels of exosomal miR-21 which stimulated BEC remodelling and therefore could potentially be used to stimulate therapeutic angiogenesis [96].

5. Concluding Remarks

While non-coding RNAs do not encode proteins they do play a critical role in regulating the levels of many cellular and extracellular proteins [115], and thus influence key signalling pathways involved in complex biological processes such as angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis and metastasis in cancer which have been previously shown to be regulated by several growth factors and their cognate receptors. The broad role of non-coding-RNAs in biology is now well established and their impact on human disease is undergoing intensive characterisation. The presence of non-coding RNAs in cancer-derived exosomes allows them to actively participate in cell-to-cell communication in the tumour microenvironment and, potentially, at more distant sites in the body. It is already clear that cancer-derived exosomal non-coding RNAs can promote tumour angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis by altering gene expression in a range of cell types including endothelial cells (i.e., BECs and LECs), fibroblasts and macrophages. Hence the regulatory role that non-coding RNAs play in tumour angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis can be considered multi-dimensional.
Our current insight into the regulation of tumour angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis by non-coding RNAs can be exploited for development of new cancer biomarkers and therapeutics, as discussed here. However, further research is required for this to occur. In particular, specific non-coding RNAs which promote tumour angiogenesis and/or lymphangiogenesis will need to be clinically validated as useful biomarkers of metastasis before being incorporated in liquid biopsy strategies for detecting and staging cancers. The use of anti-angiogenic or anti-lymphangiogenic non-coding RNAs as therapeutics to restrict tumour growth and spread seems attractive, particularly in light of recent regulatory approvals for vaccines based on lipid-nanoparticle formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA. A key challenge for this approach will be to determine the best anti-angiogenic/anti-lymphangiogenic non-coding RNAs to use for restricting cancer metastasis, which will need to be carefully assessed in clinically relevant animal models of cancer.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the conceptualisation, writing and editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

S.A.S. was supported by a Program Grant (APP1053535), a Senior Research Fellowship (APP1154746) and an Investigator Grant (APP1176732) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) and by funds from the Operational Infrastructure Support Program provided by the Victorian Government. MGA was supported by an NHMRC Program Grant (APP1053535) and by a NHMRC Ideas Grant (APP1183926).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baeriswyl, V.; Christofori, G. The angiogenic switch in carcinogenesis. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2009, 19, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stacker, S.A.; Williams, S.P.; Karnezis, T.; Shayan, R.; Fox, S.B.; Achen, M.G. Lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic vessel remodelling in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2014, 14, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ferrara, N.; Hillan, K.J.; Gerber, H.-P.; Novotny, W. Discovery and development of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody for treating cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ferrara, N. Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in the regulation of angiogenesis. Kidney Int. 1999, 56, 794–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zampetaki, A.; Albrecht, A.; Steinhofel, K. Long Non-coding RNA Structure and Function: Is There a Link? Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, H.; Lei, C.; He, Q.; Pan, Z.; Xiao, D.; Tao, Y. Nuclear functions of mammalian MicroRNAs in gene regulation, immunity and cancer. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 2009, 136, 215–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Uhlmann, S.; Mannsperger, H.; Zhang, J.D.; Horvat, E.-Á.; Schmidt, C.; Küblbeck, M.; Henjes, F.; Ward, A.; Tschulena, U.; Zweig, K.; et al. Global microRNA level regulation of EGFR-driven cell-cycle protein network in breast cancer. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2012, 8, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Man, H.S.J.; Sukumar, A.N.; Lam, G.C.; Turgeon, P.J.; Yan, M.S.; Ku, K.H.; Dubinsky, M.K.; Ho, J.J.D.; Wang, J.J.; Das, S.; et al. Angiogenic patterning by STEEL, an endothelial-enriched long noncoding RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 2401–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Fu, W.-M.; Lu, Y.-F.; Hu, B.-G.; Liang, W.-C.; Zhu, X.; Yang, H.-D.; Li, G.; Zhang, J.-F. Long noncoding RNA hotair mediated angiogenesis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by direct and indirect signaling pathways. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 4712–4723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chen, H.-X.; Xu, X.-X.; Tan, B.-Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, X.-D. MicroRNA-29b Inhibits Angiogenesis by Targeting VEGFA through the MAPK/ERK and PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathways in Endometrial Carcinoma. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 41, 933–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Y.; Cai, B.; Shen, L.; Dong, Y.; Lu, Q.; Sun, S.; Liu, S.; Ma, S.; Ma, P.X.; Chen, J.-H. MiRNA-29b suppresses tumor growth through simultaneously inhibiting angiogenesis and tumorigenesis by targeting Akt3. Cancer Lett. 2017, 397, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tripathi, V.; Shen, Z.; Chakraborty, A.; Giri, S.; Freier, S.M.; Wu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Gorospe, M.; Prasanth, S.G.; Lal, A.; et al. Long noncoding RNA MALAT1 controls cell cycle progression by regulating the expression of oncogenic transcription factor B-MYB. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, W.-D.; Zhou, D.-M.; Sun, L.-L.; Xiao, L.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, M.; Wang, W.-B.; Li, X.-Q. LncRNA WTAPP1 Promotes Migration and Angiogenesis of Endothelial Progenitor Cells via MMP1 Through MicroRNA 3120 and Akt/PI3K/Autophagy Pathways. Stem Cells 2018, 36, 1863–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Li, K.; Blum, Y.; Verma, A.; Liu, Z.; Pramanik, K.; Leigh, N.R.; Chun, C.Z.; Samant, G.V.; Zhao, B.; Garnaas, M.K.; et al. A noncoding antisense RNA in tie-1 locus regulates tie-1 function in vivo. Blood 2010, 115, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. JJia, P.; Cai, H.; Liu, X.; Chen, J.; Ma, J.; Wang, P.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, J.; Xue, Y. Long non-coding RNA H19 regulates glioma angiogenesis and the biological behavior of glioma-associated endothelial cells by inhibiting microRNA-29a. Cancer Lett. 2016, 381, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Melo, C.A.; Drost, J.; Wijchers, P.J.; Van De Werken, H.J.; De Wit, E.; Vrielink, J.A.O.; Elkon, R.; Melo, S.A.; Léveillé, N.; Kalluri, R.; et al. eRNAs are required for p53-dependent enhancer activity and gene transcription. Mol. Cell 2013, 49, 524–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Lam, M.T.Y.; Cho, H.; Lesch, H.P.; Gosselin, D.; Heinz, S.; Tanaka-Oishi, Y.; Benner, C.; Kaikkonen, M.U.; Kim, A.S.; Kosaka, M.; et al. Rev-Erbs repress macrophage gene expression by inhibiting enhancer-directed transcription. Nature 2013, 498, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Creamer, K.M.; Lawrence, J.B. XIST RNA: A window into the broader role of RNA in nuclear chromosome architecture. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2017, 372, 20160360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gong, C.; Maquat, L.E. lncRNAs transactivate STAU1-mediated mRNA decay by duplexing with 3′ UTRs via Alu elements. Nature 2011, 470, 284–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hutchinson, J.N.; Ensminger, A.W.; Clemson, C.M.; Lynch, C.R.; Lawrence, J.B.; Chess, A. A screen for nuclear transcripts identifies two linked noncoding RNAs associated with SC35 splicing domains. BMC Genom. 2007, 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lee, S.; Kopp, F.; Chang, T.-C.; Sataluri, A.; Chen, B.; Sivakumar, S.; Yu, H.; Xie, Y.; Mendell, J.T. Noncoding RNA NORAD Regulates Genomic Stability by Sequestering PUMILIO Proteins. Cell 2016, 164, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zhong, M.-E.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, G.; Xu, L.; Ge, W.; Wu, B. LncRNA H19 regulates PI3K-Akt signal pathway by functioning as a ceRNA and predicts poor prognosis in colorectal cancer: Integrative analysis of dysregulated ncRNA-associated ceRNA network. Cancer Cell Int. 2019, 19, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mao, S.; Lu, Z.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, G.; Wang, F.; Huang, J.; Lei, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, C.; et al. Exosomal miR-141 promotes tumor angiogenesis via KLF12 in small cell lung cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Guo, Z.; Wang, X.; Yang, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhang, K.; Teng, B.; Huang, C.; Zhao, Q.; Qiu, Z. Hypoxic Tumor-Derived Exosomal Long Noncoding RNA UCA1 Promotes Angiogenesis via miR-96-5p/AMOTL2 in Pancreatic Cancer. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2020, 22, 179–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Folkman, J. Tumor Angiogenesis: Therapeutic Implications. N. Engl. J. Med. 1971, 285, 1182–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tammela, T.; Zarkada, G.; Wallgard, E.; Murtomäki, A.; Suchting, S.; Wirzenius, M.; Waltari, M.; Hellström, M.; Schomber, T.; Peltonen, R.; et al. Blocking VEGFR-3 suppresses angiogenic sprouting and vascular network formation. Nature 2008, 454, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Greenfield, J.P.; Cobb, W.S.; Lyden, D. Resisting arrest: A switch from angiogenesis to vasculogenesis in recurrent malignant gliomas. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 663–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Baluk, P.; Hashizume, H.; McDonald, D.M. Cellular abnormalities of blood vessels as targets in cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2005, 15, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Skobe, M.; Hawighorst, T.; Jackson, D.G.; Prevo, R.; Janes, L.; Velasco, P.; Riccardi, L.; Alitalo, K.; Claffey, K.P.; Detmar, M. Induction of tumor lymphangiogenesis by VEGF-C promotes breast cancer metastasis. Nat. Med. 2001, 7, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mandriota, S.J.; Jussila, L.; Jeltsch, M.; Compagni, A.; Baetens, D.; Prevo, R.; Banerji, S.; Huarte, J.; Montesano, R.; Jackson, D.G.; et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-C-mediated lymphangiogenesis promotes tumour metastasis. EMBO J 2001, 20, 672–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Stacker, S.A.; Caesar, C.; Baldwin, M.E.; Thornton, G.E.; Williams, R.A.; Prevo, R.; Jackson, D.G.; Nishikawa, S.-I.; Kubo, H.; Achen, M.G. VEGF-D promotes the metastatic spread of tumor cells via the lymphatics. Nat. Med. 2001, 7, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Karnezis, T.; Shayan, R.; Caesar, C.; Roufail, S.; Harris, N.C.; Ardipradja, K.; Zhang, Y.F.; Williams, S.P.; Farnsworth, R.H.; Chai, M.G.; et al. VEGF-D promotes tumor metastasis by regulating prostaglandins produced by the collecting lymphatic endothelium. Cancer Cell 2012, 21, 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Hoshida, T.; Isaka, N.; Hagendoorn, J.; Di Tomaso, E.; Chen, Y.-L.; Pytowski, B.; Fukumura, D.; Padera, T.P.; Jain, R.K. Imaging steps of lymphatic metastasis reveals that vascular endothelial growth factor-C increases metastasis by increasing delivery of cancer cells to lymph nodes: Therapeutic implications. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 8065–8075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Gogineni, A.; Caunt, M.; Crow, A.; Lee, C.V.; Fuh, G.; Van Bruggen, N.; Ye, W.; Weimer, R.M. Inhibition of VEGF-C modulates distal lymphatic remodeling and secondary metastasis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Holmes, D.I.R.; Zachary, I. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family- angiogenic factors in health and disease. Genome Biol. 2005, 6, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Hiratsuka, S.; Minowa, O.; Kuno, J.; Noda, T.; Shibuya, M. Flt-1 lacking the tyrosine kinase domain is sufficient for normal development and angiogenesis in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 9349–9354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. De Vries, C.; Escobedo, J.A.; Ueno, H.; Houck, K.; Ferrara, N.; Williams, L.T. The fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase, a Receptor for Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor. Science 1992, 255, 989–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Terman, B.I.; Dougher-Vermazen, M.; Carrion, M.E.; Dimitrov, D.; Armellino, D.C.; Gospodarowicz, D.; Böhlen, P. Identification of the KDR tyrosine kinase as a receptor for vascular endothelial cell growth factor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1992, 187, 1579–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Joukov, V.; Sorsa, T.; Kumar, V.; Jeltsch, M.; Claesson-Welsh, L.; Cao, Y.; Saksela, O.; Kalkkinen, N.; Alitalo, K. Proteolytic processing regulates receptor specificity and activity of VEGF-C. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 3898–3911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Achen, M.G.; Jeltsch, M.; Kukk, E.; Mäkinen, T.; Vitali, A.; Wilks, A.F.; Alitalo, K.; Stacker, S.A. Vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D) is a ligand for the tyrosine kinases VEGF receptor 2 (Flk1) and VEGF receptor 3 (Flt4). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Smith, N.R.; Baker, D.; James, N.H.; Ratcliffe, K.; Jenkins, M.; Ashton, S.E.; Sproat, G.; Swann, R.; Gray, N.; Ryan, A.; et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 are localized primarily to the vasculature in human primary solid cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 3548–3561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Kerber, M.; Reiss, Y.; Wickersheim, A.; Jugold, M.; Kiessling, F.; Heil, M.; Tchaikovski, V.; Waltenberger, J.; Shibuya, M.; Plate, K.H.; et al. Flt-1 signaling in macrophages promotes glioma growth in vivo. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 7342–7351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Neuchrist, C.; Erovic, B.M.; Handisurya, A.; Fischer, M.B.; Steiner, G.E.; Hollemann, D.; Gedlicka, C.; Saaristo, A.; Burian, M. Vascular endothelial growth factor C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 expression in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Head Neck 2003, 25, 464–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Schoppmann, S.F.; Fenzl, A.; Nagy, K.; Unger, S.; Bayer, G.; Geleff, S.; Gnant, M.; Horvat, R.; Jakesz, R.; Birner, P. VEGF-C expressing tumor-associated macrophages in lymph node positive breast cancer: Impact on lymphangiogenesis and survival. Surgery 2006, 139, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mäkinen, T.; Veikkola, T.; Mustjoki, S.; Karpanen, T.; Catimel, B.; Nice, E.C.; Wise, L.; Mercer, A.; Kowalski, H.; Kerjaschki, D.; et al. Isolated lymphatic endothelial cells transduce growth, survival and migratory signals via the VEGF-C/D receptor VEGFR-3. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 4762–4773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Apte, R.S.; Chen, D.S.; Ferrara, N. VEGF in Signaling and Disease: Beyond Discovery and Development. Cell 2019, 176, 1248–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Petrova, V.; Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli, M.; Melino, G.; Amelio, I. The hypoxic tumour microenvironment. Oncogenesis 2018, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fagiani, E.; Lorentz, P.; Kopfstein, L.; Christofori, G. Angiopoietin-1 and -2 exert antagonistic functions in tumor angiogenesis, yet both induce lymphangiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 5717–5727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Matsuo, M.; Yamada, S.; Koizumi, K.; Sakurai, H.; Saiki, I. Tumour-derived fibroblast growth factor-2 exerts lymphangiogenic effects through Akt/mTOR/p70S6kinase pathway in rat lymphatic endothelial cells. Eur. J. Cancer 2007, 43, 1748–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cao, R.; Björndahl, M.A.; Religa, P.; Clasper, S.; Garvin, S.; Galter, D.; Meister, B.; Ikomi, F.; Tritsaris, K.; Dissing, S.; et al. PDGF-BB induces intratumoral lymphangiogenesis and promotes lymphatic metastasis. Cancer Cell 2004, 6, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Gibot, L.; Galbraith, T.; Kloos, B.; Das, S.; Lacroix, D.A.; Auger, F.A.; Skobe, M. Cell-based approach for 3D reconstruction of lymphatic capillaries in vitro reveals distinct functions of HGF and VEGF-C in lymphangiogenesis. Biomaterials 2016, 78, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Björndahl, M.A.; Cao, R.; Burton, J.B.; Brakenhielm, E.; Religa, P.; Galter, D.; Wu, L.; Cao, Y. Vascular endothelial growth factor-a promotes peritumoral lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 9261–9268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Marino, D.; Angehrn, Y.; Klein, S.; Riccardi, S.; Baenziger-Tobler, N.; Otto, V.I.; Pittelkow, M.; Detmar, M. Activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor promotes lymphangiogenesis in the skin. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2013, 71, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Oka, M.; Iwata, C.; Suzuki, H.I.; Kiyono, K.; Morishita, Y.; Watabe, T.; Komuro, A.; Kano, M.R.; Miyazono, K. Inhibition of endogenous TGF- signaling enhances lymphangiogenesis. Blood 2008, 111, 4571–4579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Noren, N.K.; Lu, M.; Freeman, A.L.; Koolpe, M.; Pasquale, E.B. Interplay between EphB4 on tumor cells and vascular ephrin-B2 regulates tumor growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 5583–5588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Vaahtomeri, K.; Karaman, S.; Mäkinen, T.; Alitalo, K. Lymphangiogenesis guidance by paracrine and pericellular factors. Genes Dev. 2017, 31, 1615–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kahlert, C.; Kalluri, R. Exosomes in tumor microenvironment influence cancer progression and metastasis. J. Mol. Med. 2013, 91, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. O’Brien, K.; Breyne, K.; Ughetto, S.; Laurent, L.C.; Breakefield, X.O. RNA delivery by extracellular vesicles in mammalian cells and its applications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 585–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mathieu, M.; Martin-Jaular, L.; Lavieu, G.; Théry, C. Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Huang, A.; Dong, J.; Li, S.; Wang, C.; Ding, H.; Li, H.; Su, X.; Ge, X.; Sun, L.; Bai, C.; et al. Exosomal transfer of vasorin expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma cells promotes migration of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 11, 961–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lin, X.-J.; Fang, J.-H.; Yang, X.-J.; Zhang, C.; Yuan, Y.; Zheng, L.; Zhuang, S. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell-Secreted Exosomal MicroRNA-210 Promotes Angiogenesis In Vitro and In Vivo. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2018, 11, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Zhao, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Duan, C. Multiple Roles of Exosomal Long Noncoding RNAs in Cancers. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Masoumi-Dehghi, S.; Babashah, S.; Sadeghizadeh, M. microRNA-141-3p-containing small extracellular vesicles derived from epithelial ovarian cancer cells promote endothelial cell angiogenesis through activating the JAK/STAT3 and NF-kappaB signaling pathways. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2020, 14, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kim, D.H.; Park, S.; Kim, H.; Choi, Y.J.; Kim, S.Y.; Sung, K.J.; Sung, Y.H.; Choi, C.-M.; Yun, M.; Yi, Y.-S.; et al. Tumor-derived exosomal miR-619-5p promotes tumor angiogenesis and metastasis through the inhibition of RCAN1.4. Cancer Lett. 2020, 475, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Duan, B.; Shi, S.; Yue, H.; You, B.; Shan, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Bao, L.; You, Y. Exosomal miR-17-5p promotes angiogenesis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma via targeting BAMBI. J. Cancer 2019, 10, 6681–6692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Li, J.; Yuan, H.; Xu, H.; Zhao, H.; Xiong, N. Hypoxic Cancer-Secreted Exosomal miR-182-5p Promotes Glioblastoma Angiogenesis by Targeting Kruppel-like Factor 2 and 4. Mol. Cancer Res. 2020, 18, 1218–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zhou, Z.; Zhang, H.; Deng, T.; Ning, T.; Liu, R.; Liu, D.; Bai, M.; Ying, G.; Ba, Y. Exosomes Carrying MicroRNA-155 Target Forkhead Box O3 of Endothelial Cells and Promote Angiogenesis in Gastric Cancer. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2019, 15, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Deng, T.; Zhang, H.; Yang, H.; Wang, H.; Bai, M.; Sun, W.; Wang, X.; Si, Y.; Ning, T.; Zhang, L.; et al. Exosome miR-155 Derived from Gastric Carcinoma Promotes Angiogenesis by Targeting the c-MYB/VEGF Axis of Endothelial Cells. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2020, 19, 1449–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yang, H.; Zhang, H.; Ge, S.; Ning, T.; Bai, M.; Li, J.; Li, S.; Sun, W.; Deng, T.; Zhang, L.; et al. Exosome-Derived miR-130a Activates Angiogenesis in Gastric Cancer by Targeting C-MYB in Vascular Endothelial Cells. Mol. Ther. 2018, 26, 2466–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Cao, J.; Ye, C. Exosomes from Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Promotes VEGF-C-Dependent Lymphangiogenesis by Regulating miRNA-132/TGF-beta Pathway. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 49, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Zhou, C.-F.; Ma, J.; Huang, L.; Yi, H.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Wu, X.-G.; Yan, R.-M.; Liang, L.; Zhong, M.; Yu, Y.-H.; et al. Cervical squamous cell carcinoma-secreted exosomal miR-221-3p promotes lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis by targeting VASH1. Oncogene 2019, 38, 1256–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Shi, Y.; Yang, X.; Xue, X.; Sun, D.; Cai, P.; Song, Q.; Zhang, B.; Qin, L. HANR promotes lymphangiogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma via secreting miR-296 exosome and regulating EAG1/VEGFA signaling in HDLEC cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019, 120, 17699–17708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wang, X.; Luo, G.; Zhang, K.; Cao, J.; Huang, C.; Jiang, T.; Liu, B.; Su, L.; Qiu, Z. Hypoxic Tumor-Derived Exosomal miR-301a Mediates M2 Macrophage Polarization via PTEN/PI3Kgamma to Promote Pancreatic Cancer Metastasis. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 4586–4598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Zhou, C.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, R.; Huang, L.; Mellor, A.L.; Yang, Y.; Chen, X.; Wei, W.; Wu, X.; Yu, L.; et al. Exosome-derived miR-142-5p remodels lymphatic vessels and induces IDO to promote immune privilege in the tumour microenvironment. Cell Death Differ. 2020, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fan, J.; Xu, G.; Chang, Z.; Zhu, L.; Yao, J. miR-210 transferred by lung cancer cell-derived exosomes may act as proangiogenic factor in cancer-associated fibroblasts by modulating JAK2/STAT3 pathway. Clin. Sci. 2020, 134, 807–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hsieh, C.-H.; Tai, S.-K.; Yang, M.-H. Snail-overexpressing Cancer Cells Promote M2-Like Polarization of Tumor-Associated Macrophages by Delivering MiR-21-Abundant Exosomes. Neoplasia 2018, 20, 775–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Corliss, B.A.; Azimi, M.S.; Munson, J.M.; Peirce, S.M.; Murfee, W.L. Macrophages: An Inflammatory Link Between Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis. Microcirculation 2016, 23, 95–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pakravan, K.; Babashah, S.; Sadeghizadeh, M.; Mowla, S.J.; Mossahebi-Mohammadi, M.; Ataei, F.; Dana, N.; Javan, M. MicroRNA-100 shuttled by mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes suppresses in vitro angiogenesis through modulating the mTOR/HIF-1alpha/VEGF signaling axis in breast cancer cells. Cell. Oncol. 2017, 40, 457–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Diaz-Montero, C.M.; Salem, M.L.; Nishimura, M.I.; Garrett-Mayer, E.; Cole, D.J.; Montero, A.J. Increased circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells correlate with clinical cancer stage, metastatic tumor burden, and doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2008, 58, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Feng, S.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, L.; Lu, X.; Chaudhary, S.; Teng, R.; Frederickson, C.; Champion, M.M.; Zhao, R.; Cheng, L.; et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells inhibit T cell activation through nitrating LCK in mouse cancers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 10094–10099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Deng, Z.; Rong, Y.; Teng, Y.; Zhuang, X.; Samykutty, A.; Mu, J.; Zhang, L.; Cao, P.; Yan, J.; Miller, D.; et al. Exosomes miR-126a released from MDSC induced by DOX treatment promotes lung metastasis. Oncogene 2017, 36, 639–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Yu, B.; Wang, S. Angio-LncRs: LncRNAs that regulate angiogenesis and vascular disease. Theranostics 2018, 8, 3654–3675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ma, X.; Li, Z.; Li, T.; Zhu, L.; Li, Z.; Tian, N. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR enhances angiogenesis by induction of VEGFA expression in glioma cells and transmission to endothelial cells via glioma cell derived-extracellular vesicles. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017, 9, 5012–5021. [Google Scholar]
  85. Lang, H.-L.; Hu, G.-W.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tu, W.; Lu, Y.-M.; Wu, L.; Xu, G.-H. Glioma cells promote angiogenesis through the release of exosomes containing long non-coding RNA POU3F3. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 21, 959–972. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Xu, P.; Huang, L.; Tong, J.; Huang, H.; Meng, A. Angiomotin-like2 gene (amotl2) is required for migration and proliferation of endothelial cells during angiogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 41095–41104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Zhang, C.; Luo, Y.; Cao, J.; Wang, X.; Miao, Z.; Shao, G. Exosomal lncRNA FAM225A accelerates esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression and angiogenesis via sponging miR-206 to upregulate NETO2 and FOXP1 expression. Cancer Med. 2020, 9, 8600–8611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Cheng, C.; Zhang, Z.; Cheng, F.; Shao, Z. Exosomal lncRNA RAMP2-AS1 Derived from Chondrosarcoma Cells Promotes Angiogenesis Through miR-2355-5p/VEGFR2 Axis. OncoTargets Ther. 2020, 13, 3291–3301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Lang, H.-L.; Hu, G.-W.; Zhang, B.; Kuang, W.; Chen, Y.; Wu, L.; Xu, G.-H. Glioma cells enhance angiogenesis and inhibit endothelial cell apoptosis through the release of exosomes that contain long non-coding RNA CCAT2. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 38, 785–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Wang, M.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, Z.-Y.; Zhang, R.-D.; Li, S.-A.; Zhang, P.; Shan, T.-K.; Liu, X.-Y.; Wang, Z.-M.; Zhao, P.-C.; et al. Glioma exosomal microRNA-148a-3p promotes tumor angiogenesis through activating the EGFR/MAPK signaling pathway via inhibiting ERRFI1. Cancer Cell Int. 2020, 20, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, H.; Wang, L.; Zhou, X.; Luo, X.; Liu, K.; Jiang, E.; Chen, Y.; Shao, Z.; Shang, Z. OSCC Exosomes Regulate miR-210-3p Targeting EFNA3 to Promote Oral Cancer Angiogenesis through the PI3K/AKT Pathway. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Monaco, F.; Gaetani, S.; Alessandrini, F.; Tagliabracci, A.; Bracci, M.; Valentino, M.; Neuzil, J.; Amati, M.; Bovenzi, M.; Tomasetti, M.; et al. Exosomal transfer of miR-126 promotes the anti-tumour response in malignant mesothelioma: Role of miR-126 in cancer-stroma communication. Cancer Lett. 2019, 463, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. He, L.; Zhu, W.; Chen, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, X. Ovarian cancer cell-secreted exosomal miR-205 promotes metastasis by inducing angiogenesis. Theranostics 2019, 9, 8206–8220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Bai, M.; Li, J.; Yang, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, Z.; Deng, T.; Zhu, K.; Ning, T.; Fan, Q.; Ying, G.; et al. miR-135b Delivered by Gastric Tumor Exosomes Inhibits FOXO1 Expression in Endothelial Cells and Promotes Angiogenesis. Mol. Ther. 2019, 27, 1772–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Du, L.; Li, G.; Yang, Y.; Yang, G.; Wan, J.; Ma, Z.; Hou, Y. Exosomes from microRNA-199-3p-modified adipose-derived stem cells promote proliferation and migration of endothelial tip cells by downregulation of semaphorin 3A. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2018, 11, 4879–4888. [Google Scholar]
  96. An, Y.; Zhao, J.; Nie, F.; Qin, Z.; Xue, H.; Wang, G.; Li, D. Exosomes from Adipose-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCs) Overexpressing miR-21 Promote Vascularization of Endothelial Cells. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Raimondi, L.; De Luca, A.; Gallo, A.; Costa, V.; Russelli, G.; Cuscino, N.; Manno, M.; Raccosta, S.; Carina, V.; Bellavia, D.; et al. Osteosarcoma cell-derived exosomes affect tumor microenvironment by specific packaging of microRNAs. Carcinogenesis 2020, 41, 666–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, Z.-F.; Liao, F.; Wu, H.; Dai, J. Glioma stem cells-derived exosomal miR-26a promotes angiogenesis of microvessel endothelial cells in glioma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Sun, X.; Ma, X.; Wang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Bihl, J.C.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, C. Glioma stem cells-derived exosomes promote the angiogenic ability of endothelial cells through miR-21:VEGF signal. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 36137–36148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Wu, X.-G.; Zhou, C.-F.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Yan, R.-M.; Wei, W.-F.; Chen, X.-J.; Yi, H.-Y.; Liang, L.-J.; Fan, L.-S.; Liang, L.; et al. Cancer-derived exosomal miR-221-3p promotes angiogenesis by targeting THBS2 in cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Angiogenesis 2019, 22, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chen, X.; Yang, F.; Zhang, T.; Wang, W.; Xi, W.; Li, Y.; Zhang, D.; Huo, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yang, A.; et al. MiR-9 promotes tumorigenesis and angiogenesis and is activated by MYC and OCT4 in human glioma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Bao, L.; You, B.; Shi, S.; Shan, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Yue, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, W.; Shi, Y.; Liu, Y.; et al. Metastasis-associated miR-23a from nasopharyngeal carcinoma-derived exosomes mediates angiogenesis by repressing a novel target gene TSGA10. Oncogene 2018, 37, 2873–2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hsu, Y.-L.; Hung, J.-Y.; Chang, W.-A.; Lin, Y.-S.; Pan, Y.-C.; Tsai, P.-H.; Wu, C.-Y.; Kuo, P.-L. Hypoxic lung cancer-secreted exosomal miR-23a increased angiogenesis and vascular permeability by targeting prolyl hydroxylase and tight junction protein ZO-1. Oncogene 2017, 36, 4929–4942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Liu, J.Y.; Jiang, L.; He, T.; Liu, J.J.; Fan, J.Y.; Xu, X.H.; Tang, B.; Shi, Y.; Zhao, Y.L.; Qian, F.; et al. NETO2 promotes invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer cells via activation of PI3K/Akt/NF-kappaB/Snail axis and predicts outcome of the patients. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Keller, S.; Ridinger, J.; Rupp, A.-K.; Janssen, J.W.G.; Altevogt, P. Body fluid derived exosomes as a novel template for clinical diagnostics. J. Transl. Med. 2011, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Siravegna, G.; Mussolin, B.; Venesio, T.; Marsoni, S.; Seoane, J.; Dive, C.; Papadopoulos, N.; Kopetz, S.; Corcoran, R.; Siu, L.; et al. How liquid biopsies can change clinical practice in oncology. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, 1580–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Wang, J.; Chang, S.; Li, G.; Sun, Y. Application of liquid biopsy in precision medicine: Opportunities and challenges. Front. Med. 2017, 11, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Tellez-Gabriel, M.; Heymann, D. Exosomal lncRNAs: The newest promising liquid biopsy. Cancer Drug Resist. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Kapoor, R.; So, J.B.; Zhu, F.; Too, H.-P.; Yeoh, K.-G.; Yoong, J.S.-Y. Evaluating the Use of microRNA Blood Tests for Gastric Cancer Screening in a Stratified Population-Level Screening Program: An Early Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Value Health 2020, 23, 1171–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. He, C.; Yang, W.; Yang, J.; Ding, J.; Li, S.; Wu, H.; Zhou, F.; Jiang, Y.; Teng, L.; Yang, J. Long Noncoding RNA MEG3 Negatively Regulates Proliferation and Angiogenesis in Vascular Endothelial Cells. DNA Cell Biol. 2017, 36, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Besnier, M.; Shantikumar, S.; Anwar, M.; Dixit, P.; Chamorro-Jorganes, A.; Sweaad, W.; Sala-Newby, G.; Madeddu, P.; Thomas, A.C.; Howard, L.; et al. miR-15a/-16 Inhibit Angiogenesis by Targeting the Tie2 Coding Sequence: Therapeutic Potential of a miR-15a/16 Decoy System in Limb Ischemia. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2019, 17, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Polack, F.P.; Thomas, S.J.; Kitchin, N.; Absalon, J.; Gurtman, A.; Lockhart, S.; Perez, J.L.; Marc, G.P.; Moreira, E.D.; Zerbini, C.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2603–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Ma, T.; Sun, J.; Zhao, Z.; Lei, W.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, J.; Shen, Z. A brief review: Adipose-derived stem cells and their therapeutic potential in cardiovascular diseases. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Liu, L.; Jin, X.; Hu, C.-F.; Li, R.; Zhou, Z.; Shen, C.-X. Exosomes Derived from Mesenchymal Stem Cells Rescue Myocardial Ischaemia/Reperfusion Injury by Inducing Cardiomyocyte Autophagy Via AMPK and Akt Pathways. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 43, 52–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Mattick, J.S.; Makunin, I.V. Non-coding RNA. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006, 15, R17–R29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Biomolecules 11 00249 g001 550
Figure 1. Non-coding RNA is classified as either long or small based on a 200-nucleotide cut-off. Small RNA (e.g., miRNA) has less defined secondary structure whereas long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) has more defined secondary structure required for its function in transcriptional regulation by binding chromatin remodelling proteins and recruitment of transcription factors, activators and suppressors. For example, lncRNA STEEL, an endothelial cell-specific lncRNA, upregulates transcription of the genes for endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and the transcription factor Kruppel-like factor 2 (KLF2) by recruiting PARP1 to their promoter regions [9]. lncRNA Hotair stimulates angiogenesis by recruiting chromatin remodelling proteins which activate transcription of the gene for vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) [10]. Nuclear miRNAs play a role in transcription by recruiting transcriptional activator and repressor chromatin remodelling proteins [6], and miRNAs are involved in the post-transcriptional regulation of mRNAs by modulating their translation or degradation, e.g., miR-29-b inhibits angiogenesis by negatively regulating the expression of VEGFA and Akt3 [11,12]. lncRNAs can act post-transcriptionally to regulate mRNA by modulating mRNA splicing, translation and mRNA degradation, e.g., lncRNA MALAT1 plays a role in angiogenesis through several mechanisms including the regulation of alternative splicing of the oncogenic transcription factor B-MYB in endothelial cells [13], WTAPP1 lncRNA promotes migration by increasing the expression of the matrix metalloproteinase MMP1 [14] and Tie-1AS lncRNA selectively binds and degrades tie-1 mRNA leading to specific defects in cell junctions and tube formation [15]. Further, lncRNAs can act as sponges to bind and sequester miRNAs, e.g., lncRNA H19 sponges miR-29a resulting in derepression of Vasohibin 2 (VASH2) and angiogenesis [16]. This figure was created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. Non-coding RNA is classified as either long or small based on a 200-nucleotide cut-off. Small RNA (e.g., miRNA) has less defined secondary structure whereas long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) has more defined secondary structure required for its function in transcriptional regulation by binding chromatin remodelling proteins and recruitment of transcription factors, activators and suppressors. For example, lncRNA STEEL, an endothelial cell-specific lncRNA, upregulates transcription of the genes for endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and the transcription factor Kruppel-like factor 2 (KLF2) by recruiting PARP1 to their promoter regions [9]. lncRNA Hotair stimulates angiogenesis by recruiting chromatin remodelling proteins which activate transcription of the gene for vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) [10]. Nuclear miRNAs play a role in transcription by recruiting transcriptional activator and repressor chromatin remodelling proteins [6], and miRNAs are involved in the post-transcriptional regulation of mRNAs by modulating their translation or degradation, e.g., miR-29-b inhibits angiogenesis by negatively regulating the expression of VEGFA and Akt3 [11,12]. lncRNAs can act post-transcriptionally to regulate mRNA by modulating mRNA splicing, translation and mRNA degradation, e.g., lncRNA MALAT1 plays a role in angiogenesis through several mechanisms including the regulation of alternative splicing of the oncogenic transcription factor B-MYB in endothelial cells [13], WTAPP1 lncRNA promotes migration by increasing the expression of the matrix metalloproteinase MMP1 [14] and Tie-1AS lncRNA selectively binds and degrades tie-1 mRNA leading to specific defects in cell junctions and tube formation [15]. Further, lncRNAs can act as sponges to bind and sequester miRNAs, e.g., lncRNA H19 sponges miR-29a resulting in derepression of Vasohibin 2 (VASH2) and angiogenesis [16]. This figure was created with BioRender.com.
Biomolecules 11 00249 g001
Biomolecules 11 00249 g002 550
Figure 2. The schematic diagram illustrates the role of non-coding RNA in the growth and remodelling of lymphatic vessels in the context of cancer. The lymphatic system is composed of a hierarchy of vessels starting with blind-ended initial lymphatics which allow the entry of cells and fluid via their incomplete junctions. Lymph fluid then flows through more structured pre-collecting vessels to collecting vessels which acquire a complete lining of smooth muscle cells. All of these lymphatic vessels are lined with specialised lymphatic endothelial cells (LEC). In the context of cancer miRNA and long non-coding RNA are released from tumour cells and cells of the tumour microenvironment via exosomes. This includes but is not limited to tumour cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, T-lymphocytes and smooth muscle cells. These cells release exosomes containing specific miRNAs and lncRNAs, which is indicated in the legend and by the coloured coded exosomes in the figure. The insert shows the interaction of the exosomes with the membrane of LEC which then internalise the exosomes containing ncRNA for interaction with cellular proteins and RNA/DNA. These abbreviations used are: LEC stands for lymphatic endothelial cell, CAF for cancer-associated fibroblast, MDSC for myeloid-derived suppressor cells and SMC for smooth muscle cell. This figure was created with BioRender.com.
Figure 2. The schematic diagram illustrates the role of non-coding RNA in the growth and remodelling of lymphatic vessels in the context of cancer. The lymphatic system is composed of a hierarchy of vessels starting with blind-ended initial lymphatics which allow the entry of cells and fluid via their incomplete junctions. Lymph fluid then flows through more structured pre-collecting vessels to collecting vessels which acquire a complete lining of smooth muscle cells. All of these lymphatic vessels are lined with specialised lymphatic endothelial cells (LEC). In the context of cancer miRNA and long non-coding RNA are released from tumour cells and cells of the tumour microenvironment via exosomes. This includes but is not limited to tumour cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, T-lymphocytes and smooth muscle cells. These cells release exosomes containing specific miRNAs and lncRNAs, which is indicated in the legend and by the coloured coded exosomes in the figure. The insert shows the interaction of the exosomes with the membrane of LEC which then internalise the exosomes containing ncRNA for interaction with cellular proteins and RNA/DNA. These abbreviations used are: LEC stands for lymphatic endothelial cell, CAF for cancer-associated fibroblast, MDSC for myeloid-derived suppressor cells and SMC for smooth muscle cell. This figure was created with BioRender.com.
Biomolecules 11 00249 g002
Table
Table 1. Regulation of Lymphatic Remodelling by exosome-derived miRNAs.
Table 1. Regulation of Lymphatic Remodelling by exosome-derived miRNAs.
Cells Producing ExosomesmiRNA in ExosomesTarget GeneRole of MiRNA in Promoting Lymphangiogenesis Recipient CellsReference
Adipose-derived stem cellsmiR-132Smad-7Regulating TGF-β pathwayLECs[71]
Cervical squamous cell carcinoma cellsmiR-221-3pVasohibin-1Regulating an inhibitor of lymphangiogenesis implicated in microtubule dynamicsLECs[72]
Hepatocellular carcinoma cellsmiR-296EAG1Inhibiting VEGFA expression LECs[73]
Hypoxic pancreatic cancer cellsmiR-301a-3pPTENPromoting M2 polarization of macrophages by activation of the PTEN/PI3Kγ pathwayMacrophages[74]
Cervical squamous cell carcinoma cellsmiR-142-5pARID2Inducing IDO expression via ARID2–DNMT1–IFN-γ signalling to suppress CD8+ T cellsLECs[72,75]
ARID2 = AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 2; DNMT1 = DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1; EAG1 = Ether-à-go-go-1; IFN-γ = Interferon gamma; LECs = Lymphatic endothelial cells; PI3Kγ = Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-gamma; PTEN = Phosphatase and tensin homolog; TGF-β = Transforming growth factor beta; VEGFA = Vascular endothelial growth factor A.
Table
Table 2. Regulation of angiogenic remodelling by exosome-derived non-coding RNAs.
Table 2. Regulation of angiogenic remodelling by exosome-derived non-coding RNAs.
Cells Producing ExosomesncRNA in ExosomesmRNA/miRNA TargetRole of ncRNA in Promoting AngiogenesisRecipient CellsReference
Hypoxic pancreatic cancer cellsUCA1 lncRNAmiR-96-5pSponging miR-96-5p thus derepressing its target AMOTL2 thereby activating ERK1/ERK2 axisHUVECs[25]
Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma cellsFAM225A lncRNAmiR-206Sponging miR-206 thus derepressing its targets NETO2 and FOXP1 thereby activating PI3K/Akt/NF-κB/Snail axisHUVECs[87]
Chondrosarcoma cellsRAMP2-AS1 lncRNAmiR-2355-5pSponging miR-2355-5p thus derepressing its target VEGFR2 thereby increasing angiogenic cell surface receptorsHUVECs[88]
Glioma cellsPOU3F3 lncRNAbFGF, VEGFA, bFGFRIncreasing the expression of bFGF, VEGFA and bFGFR in endothelial cellsHBMECs[85]
Glioma cellsHOTAIR lncRNAVEGFAIncreasing the expression of VEGFA in endothelial cellsHBMECs[84]
Glioma cellsCCAT2 lncRNAVEGFA, TGF-β, Bcl-2, and BaxIncreasing the expression of VEGFA and other angiogenic signalling in endothelial cells plus decreasing apoptosisHUVECs[89]
Small-cell lung cancer cellsmiR-141KLF12Repressing an anti-angiogenic transcriptional factorHUVECs[24]
Glioma cellsmiR-148a-3pERRFI1Repressing an anti-angiogenic cell surface receptorHUVECs[90]
Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma cellsmiR-210-3pEphrinA3Repressing ephrinA3 and therefore activating PI3K/AKT signallingHUVECs[91]
Glioblastoma multiforme cellsmiR-182-5pKLF2 and KLF4Repressing anti-angiogenic transcription factorsHUVECs[67]
Lung cancer cellsmiR-210TET2Reprogramming normal fibroblasts into CAFsFibroblasts[76]
Epithelial ovarian cancer cellsmiR-141-3pSOCS5Repressing an inhibitor of the JAK/STAT3 and NF-κB signalling pathwaysHUVECs[64]
Non-small cell lung cancer cellsmiR-619-5pRCAN1.4Repressing an inhibitor of the calcineurin/NFAT pathwayHUVECs[65]
Gastric carcinoma cellsmiR-130ac-MYBRepressing an inhibitor of the expression of VEGFAHUVECs[70]
Gastric carcinoma cellsmiR-155c-MYBRepressing an inhibitor of the expression of VEGFAHUVECs[69]
Gastric carcinoma cellsmiR-155FOXO3aRepressing anti-angiogenic transcription factorsHUVECs[68]
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma cellsmiR-17-5pBAMBIRepressing an inhibitor of the VEGFA/AKT axisHUVECs[66]
HUVECsmiR-126IRS1, VEGFA and EGFL7Targeting crucial factors involved in this processMalignant mesothelioma cells[92]
Ovarian cancer cellsmiR-205PTENRepressing a phosphatase that negatively regulates AKTHUVECs[93]
Gastric cancer cellsmiR-135bFOXO1Repressing anti-angiogenic transcription factorsHUVECs[94]
Adipose-derived stem cellsmiR-199-3pSema3ADriving the migration of endothelial tip cells and their sproutingHUVECs[95]
Adipose-derived stem cellsmiR-21PTENRepressing a phosphatase that negatively regulates AKTHUVECs[96]
Osterosarcoma cellsmiR-21PTENRepressing a phosphatase that negatively regulates AKTHUVECs[97]
Glioma stem cellsmiR-26aPTENRepressing a phosphatase that negatively regulates AKTHUVECs[98]
Glioma stem cellsmiR-21Not identifiedUpregulating VEGFA expression in endothelial cellsHUVECs[99]
Cervical squamous cell carcinoma cellsmiR-221-3pTHBS2Repressing a potent endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesisHUVECs[100]
Glioma cellsmiR-9COL18A1, THBS2, PTCH1 and PHD3Repressing endogenous inhibitors of angiogenesis and initiating HIF-1α/VEGF signal transductionHUVECs[101]
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma cellsmiR-23a TSGA10Repressing TSGA10, a novel inhibitor of angiogenesisHUVECs[102]
Mesenchymal stem cellsmiR-100 mTORInducing expression of VEGFA in tumour cellsBreast cancer cells[79]
Hypoxic lung cancer cellsmiR-23aPHD1, PHD2 and ZO-1Initiating HIF-1α/VEGFA signal transduction, and promoting vascular permeability by destabilising cellular junctionsHUVECs[103]
Hepatocellular carcinoma cellsmiR-210SMAD4 and STAT6Repressing anti-angiogenic transcription factors and signal transducersHUVECs[62]
Head and neck cancer cellsmiR-21PTEN, PDCD4 and IGFBP3Stimulating M2 polarization of tumour-associated macrophagesMacrophages[77]
Myeloid derived suppressor cellsmiR-126aNot identifiedPromoting an inflammatory milieu that leads to metastasisCD4+ T-helper cell type-2[82]
BAMBI = BMP and Activin receptor Membrane Bound Inhibitor; CAFs = cancer-associated fibroblasts; COL18A1 = Collagen alpha-1(XVIII) chain; EGFL7 = EGF-like domain 7; ERRFI1 = ERBB Receptor Feedback Inhibitor 1; FOXO = Forkhead Box; HBMECs = Human brain microvascular endothelial cells; HIF-1α = Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha; HUVECs = Human umbilical vein endothelial cells; IGFBP3 = Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3; IRS1 = insulin receptor substrate 1;KLF = Kruppel Like Factor; mTOR = mammalian target of rapamycin; PDCD4 = Programmed Cell Death 4; PHD = Prolyl hydroxylase; PTCH1 = Patched 1; PTEN = Phosphatase and tensin homolog; RCAN = Regulators of the calcineurin; Sema3A = Semaphorin 3A; SOCS5 = Cytokine signaling 5; STAT4 = Signal transducer and activator of transcription 4; TET2 = Tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2; THBS2 = Thrombospondin-2; TSGA10 = Testis Specific 10; VEGFA = vascular endothelial growth factor A; VEGFR2 = Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2; ZO-1 = Zonula occludens-1.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arcucci, V.; Stacker, S.A.; Achen, M.G. Control of Gene Expression by Exosome-Derived Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11020249

AMA Style

Arcucci V, Stacker SA, Achen MG. Control of Gene Expression by Exosome-Derived Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(2):249. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11020249

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arcucci, Valeria, Steven A. Stacker, and Marc G. Achen. 2021. "Control of Gene Expression by Exosome-Derived Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis" Biomolecules 11, no. 2: 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11020249

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop