Next Article in Journal
Targeting of Histone Demethylases KDM5A and KDM6B Inhibits the Proliferation of Temozolomide-Resistant Glioblastoma Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
State of the Art of Natural Killer Cell Imaging: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Circulating miRNAs in Untreated Breast Cancer: An Exploratory Multimodality Morpho-Functional Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dysregulation of Natural Killer Cells in Obesity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/cancers11060877
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

DNAM-1 and the TIGIT/PVRIG/TACTILE Axis: Novel Immune Checkpoints for Natural Killer Cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapy

by
Beatriz Sanchez-Correa
1,†,
Isabel Valhondo
1,†,
Fakhri Hassouneh
1,†,
Nelson Lopez-Sejas
1,
Alejandra Pera
2,3,
Juan M. Bergua
4,
Maria Jose Arcos
4,
Helena Bañas
4,
Ignacio Casas-Avilés
4,
Esther Durán
5,
Corona Alonso
2,6,
Rafael Solana
2,3,6,* and
Raquel Tarazona
1,*
1
Immunology Unit, Department of Physiology, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
2
Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), 14004 Córdoba, Spain
3
Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
4
Department of Hematology, Hospital San Pedro de Alcantara, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
5
Histology and Pathology Unit, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
6
Reina Sofia University Hospital, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.
Cancers 2019, 11(6), 877; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060877
Submission received: 19 May 2019 / Revised: 19 June 2019 / Accepted: 21 June 2019 / Published: 23 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Killer Cells and Cancer Therapy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Natural killer (NK) cells are lymphocytes of the innate immune response characterized by their role in the destruction of tumor cells. Activation of NK cells depend on a fine balance between activating and inhibitory signals mediated by different receptors. In recent years, a family of paired receptors that interact with ligands of the Nectin/Nectin-like (Necl) family has attracted great interest. Two of these ligands, Necl-5 (usually termed CD155 or PVR) and Nectin-2 (CD112), frequently expressed on different types of tumor cells, are recognized by a group of receptors expressed on T and NK cells that exert opposite functions after interacting with their ligands. These receptors include DNAM-1 (CD226), TIGIT, TACTILE (CD96) and the recently described PVRIG. Whereas activation through DNAM-1 after recognition of CD155 or CD112 enhances NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity against a wide range of tumor cells, TIGIT recognition of these ligands exerts an inhibitory effect on NK cells by diminishing IFN-γ production, as well as NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. PVRIG has also been identified as an inhibitory receptor that recognizes CD112 but not CD155. However, little is known about the role of TACTILE as modulator of immune responses in humans. TACTILE control of tumor growth and metastases has been reported in murine models, and it has been suggested that it negatively regulates the anti-tumor functions mediated by DNAM-1. In NK cells from patients with solid cancer and leukemia, it has been observed a decreased expression of DNAM-1 that may shift the balance in favor to the inhibitory receptors TIGIT or PVRIG, further contributing to the diminished NK cell-mediated cytotoxic capacity observed in these patients. Analysis of DNAM-1, TIGIT, TACTILE and PVRIG on human NK cells from solid cancer or leukemia patients will clarify the role of these receptors in cancer surveillance. Overall, it can be speculated that in cancer patients the TIGIT/PVRIG pathways are upregulated and represent novel targets for checkpoint blockade immunotherapy.

1. Introduction

The immune system response to pathogens is controlled by different regulatory mechanisms to maintain tolerance to self and protect tissue integrity. Several signaling pathways mediated by inhibitory receptors have been described to contribute to immune homeostasis while defending against infected and transformed cells. Among these inhibitory receptors, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) have been well characterized in T cells and have been shown to play an important role in regulating T cell activation and effector functions, particularly in the context of cancer immunology [1]. The use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting CTLA-4 or PD-1 checkpoint pathways have been approved for clinical use leading to durable clinical responses in various cancer types [2,3,4]. CTLA-4 is a co-inhibitory receptor that shares the same ligands (B7 family that includes CD80 and CD86) with CD28, the main T cell co-stimulatory signal, constituting the first evidence for paired activating-inhibitory receptors on T cells interacting with the same ligands expressed on other cell types [5]. Thus, inhibitory signals provided by an ample array of receptors are essential for immune homeostasis and tolerance of both T cells and natural killer (NK) cells. However, inhibitory signals also contribute to the immunosuppressive microenvironment in cancer and are preferred targets for cancer immunotherapy since checkpoint blockade therapy has been particularly successful in some cancer settings such as melanoma.
CD28 and CTLA-4 are paired receptors that, by interacting with B7 family ligands, regulate T cell activation but are not involved in the regulation of human NK cell function. Other two major families of paired co-stimulatory and inhibitory receptors that regulate NK cell function have been defined in humans. (i) The MHC class I-specific receptors such as Killer Immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) and NKG2 families [6] that include activating and inhibitory forms, and (ii) a group of receptors that interact with molecules of the Nectins and Nectin-like (Necls) family [7] and that include the activating receptor DNAM-1 (DNAX-associated molecule 1) and the inhibitory receptors TIGIT (T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain), PVRIG (PVR-related Ig domain) and TACTILE (T cell activation, increased late expression), that constitute the TIGIT/PVRIG/TACTILE inhibitory axis involved in the control of NK cell function.
NK cells are innate lymphoid cells (ILC) playing major roles in the defense against tumors and virus-infected cells. NK cell constitutive expression of lytic proteins makes them ready-to-lyse target cells. NK cells recognize transformed cells that have lost the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens. In humans, peripheral blood NK cells can be classified into different subsets according to their surface receptor expression and functionality [8,9]. In addition, activated NK cells release interferon (IFN)-γ and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α that are involved in the destruction of target cells and promote inflammatory responses [10]. NK cell ability to lyse transformed cells without antigen-specificity makes them unique candidates for cancer treatment. NK cell function depends on a complex balance between signals transmitted through activating receptors and inhibitory receptors.
The major NK cell inhibitory receptors KIR and NKG2A recognize human leukocyte antigens (HLA) class I molecules and prevent NK cell-mediated lysis of healthy cells [11]. HLA class I loss is a frequent event on tumor-transformed cells and virus-infected cells that increases their susceptibility to NK cell-mediated lysis, whereas cancer cells expressing HLA class I molecules are resistant to NK cell-mediated lysis. The anti-leukemia role of NK cells is supported by studies on haemopoietic stem cell transplantation showing that alloreactive NK cells (KIR mismatched) derived from haploidentical donors kill leukemia blasts preventing leukemia relapse [12,13]. NK cells are the first lymphocytes to appear after haemopoietic stem cell transplantation but frequently are dysfunctional compared to NK cells from healthy donors. Different strategies have been designed for NK cell manipulation including the use of checkpoint inhibitors [14]. Many studies have reported downregulation of activating receptors in peripheral blood NK cells from patients with hematological malignancies and solid cancers that correlated with disease progression. Despite the NK cells limited ability to infiltrate solid tumors and reduced cytotoxicity, accumulated evidence shows a role for NK cells in the control of metastasis [15,16]. However, little is known concerning infiltrating NK cells in solid tumor and the immunotherapeutic approaches designed to enhance NK cell activity in solid tumors [17].
Indeed, NK cell-mediated anti-tumor responses are also governed by other inhibitory receptors expressed on different immune cells including NK cells, such as T-cell Ig and mucin-containing domain-3 (Tim-3) [18], Lymphocyte Activation Gene 3 (LAG-3) [19] and PD-1 [20] whose ligands are non-MHC class I related molecules (Figure 1). NK cell inhibitory receptors act as immune checkpoints controlling NK cell activation and effector function via engagement of these checkpoints by their ligands on target cells. In the last decade, blockade of these checkpoints offers novel opportunities for cancer immunotherapy [21,22].
Recently, another family of paired receptors that interact with ligands of the family of Nectins and Nectin-like molecules (Necls) has attracted great interest [23,24]. Thus, DNAM-1 (also known as CD226) [25], TACTILE (also known as CD96) [24,26], TIGIT [24,27], and PVRIG [28,29] are receptors that share the same ligands, CD155 (Necl-5) and/or CD112 (Nectin-2), that are also known to exert opposite functions on T and NK cells functions. Whereas DNAM-1 is an activating/co-stimulatory receptor [30] involved in recognition and lysis of tumor cells, TIGIT [27] and PVRIG [28] engagement inhibit NK cell function.
Advances in NK cell-based immunotherapy against cancer rely on the studies of NK cell phenotype (e.g., expression of inhibitory and activating receptors) and lytic capacity (balance between activating and inhibitory signals) that can be regulated by cytokines and on the studies of checkpoint blockade with mAb. In this context, the analysis of the activating receptor DNAM-1 and its paired receptors TIGIT, PVRIG and TACTILE opens new therapeutic possibilities.

2. Nectin and Nectin-Like Protein: Expression on Tumor Cells and Their Recognition by NK Cells

Nectins and nectin-like molecules (Necls) are a family of cell adhesion molecules that belong to the immunoglobulin superfamily. They are expressed in many different cell types and mediate both homotypic and heterotypic cell-cell adhesion. Besides their role in cell adhesion, it has been shown that several members of this family can serve as virus receptors (herpesvirus 1 or poliovirus). In addition, some Nectins or Necls can be expressed on cells of the immune system playing an immunoregulatory function by interacting with receptors expressed at the cell surface of other immune cells [31]. As indicated above, some members of this Nectins and Necls family (Nectin-2 and Necl-5) have attracted great interest for their potential use as cancer biomarkers, as they are overexpressed on a variety of tumor cells from different origins, and as potential targets in cancer immunotherapy as they can be recognized by activating and inhibitory paired-receptors expressed on NK cells [23,32,33,34].

2.1. CD155 or Necl-5

CD155, also referred as Necl-5, as it belongs to the Necls molecule family, was originally identified as a poliovirus receptor (PVR). It is an immunoglobulin (Ig)-like adhesion molecule, with an important role in cell migration and proliferation [31,35,36]. In the field of tumor immunology, CD155 has gained an importance as it is overexpressed in various human malignancies and is involved in mediating tumor cell invasion and migration [37,38]. As it will be reviewed below, CD155 has an important immunoregulatory functions through its interactions with both co-stimulatory receptor DNAM-1 (CD226) and co-inhibitory receptor TIGIT and TACTILE (CD96) on NK and T cells [39,40,41].

2.2. CD112 or Nectin-2

Another member of the Nectin-family molecules is CD112, also termed Nectin-2 or poliovirus receptor-related 2 protein (PVRL2). It is an adhesion molecule that belongs to the Ig gene superfamily and it is involved in the formation of cell junctions [42]. CD112 is closely connected to tumorigenesis, being overexpressed in different types of cancers such as acute myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma and epithelial cancers [43,44,45]. Besides, it has been reported that CD112 expression is associated with aggressiveness and poor prognosis of gallbladder cancer [46]. CD112 is a ligand for human DNAM-1, and its interaction along with other triggering NK receptors triggers human NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity [39,47]. However, it has been reported that the inhibitory receptors TIGIT and PVRIG also recognize and interact with CD112 leading to inhibition of NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity [29,41].

2.3. CD111 (Nectin-1) and CD113 (Nectin-3)

In addition to CD112 and CD155, other Nectins have been recently identified as ligands for TACTILE and TIGIT. Thus, CD111 (Nectin-1 or PVRL1) that was previously described as a receptor for herpes viruses [48] is also a ligand for TACTILE [49], and CD113 (Nectin-3 or PVRL3), that originally was described as a member of Ig-like cell adhesion molecules [50], has recently been identified as a ligand for TIGIT [51].

3. Paired Receptors for Nectin and Nectin-Like Proteins

DNAM-1, TIGIT, PVRIG and TACTILE (CD96), constitute a group of Ig superfamily receptors that share the same ligands but show opposite functions. The DNAM-1 activating receptor and the TIGIT/PVRIG/TACTILE inhibitory axis have been shown to be key regulators of anti-tumor immune responses.

3.1. DNAM-1

DNAM-1 (also known as CD226) was first discovered as a costimulatory receptor in cytotoxic T cells that was named TLiSA1 for human T lineage-specific activation antigen [52,53]. DNAM-1 is also expressed by NK cells and other immune cells such as monocytes. The extracellular portion of DNAM-1 contains two Ig-like domains and its cytoplasmic tail contains three tyrosine residues. NK cell cytotoxicity is triggered by DNAM-1 cross-linking resulting in Fyn mediated tyrosine phosphorylation [53]. DNAM-1 ligands were identified as PVR (CD155) and Nectin-2 (CD112) [39,54]. DNAM-1 is associated with NK cell education [55]. Thus, according to the expression of DNAM-1 two distinct NK cell subsets have been described in mice, the DNAM1+ and DNAM-1− subsets, with different functions. Specifically, DNAM-1+ NK cells express high levels of inflammatory cytokines and high proliferative capacity whereas DNAM-1− NK cells produce high levels of chemokines and have greater expression of NK cell receptor genes. DNAM-1− cells differentiate from DNAM-1+ NK cells, suggesting that DNAM-1 expression distinguishes the NK cell maturation program status. DNAM-1 expression decreases during NK cells differentiation and the DNAM-1+/ DNAM-1− NK cells ratio diminishes from birth [30]. Nevertheless, it is not clear if this model of NK cell maturation applies also to human NK cells. Unlike the mouse, most human NK cells express DNAM-1 and its expression, together with LFA-1, has been linked to NK cell education [56,57]. However, differences in DNAM-1 expression level can represent different maturation status of human NK cells [55]. Down-regulation of DNAM-1 expression on human NK cells has been reported in healthy ageing and in several diseases including cancer [58,59,60,61].
The recognition of CD155 by DNAM-1 potentiates the cytotoxicity of NK cells against a range of tumor cells and has been shown to be critical for tumor immunosurveillance in several murine models [62,63,64], although its significance in immunosurveillance has been controversial as, in some experimental circumstances, the antitumoral effect of DNAM-1 was significant only when the antitumoral response induced by cytokines was analyzed [65].
Cancer cells frequently express high levels of DNAM-1’s ligands and DNAM-1 activation is involved in the killing of cancer cells [33,43,44,47,66]. Indeed, NK cell-mediated lysis of cancer cells was associated with the expression of CD155 in tumor cells from neuroblastoma [67] and ovarian cancer patients [68,69]. Furthermore, the expression of DNAM-1 was decreased in NK cells from acute myeloid leukemia patients and it was negatively correlated with the expression of CD112 in blasts [43] supporting that DNAM-1 downregulation on NK cells in patients with cancer, is a consequence of the tumor burden. Increased expression of DNAM-1’s ligands are induced on multiple myeloma cells after chemotherapy, increasing their susceptibility to NK cell-mediated lysis [70]. NK cells in myelodysplastic syndrome patients show reduced levels of DNAM-1 and NKG2D that correlated with bone marrow blast counts [61]. DNAM-1’s ligands, CD155 and CD112, can be also expressed in some immune cells [71,72]. DNAM-1 cooperates with NKp30 in the lysis of immature dendritic cells expressing DNAM-1 ligands [71]. Activated T cells upregulate CD155 and became susceptible to NK cell-mediated killing, a process that requires the cooperation between DNAM-1 and NKG2D [72].
In the last decade, different experimental models have demonstrated the existence of NK cells with adaptive capacities to remember previous encounters with pathogens such as CMV and to mediate more effective protection against pathogens [73]. It has been shown that DNAM-1 is involved in the generation of NK cells displaying these memory-like functions [74].
The studies of the expression of DNAM-1 in NK cells supports that its interaction with its ligands on tumor cells plays an important role against different types of cancer. However, the discovery in recent years that these ligands are also recognized by inhibitory receptors makes it difficult to interpret the prognostic value of the expression of CD155 and CD112 in tumor cells.

3.2. TIGIT

TIGIT, also called VSig9, Vstm3, or WUCAM, was first identified in 2009 as a novel member of the Ig superfamily [41,51,75,76]. TIGIT is an inhibitory receptor that is expressed on immune cells such as effector and memory T cells, regulatory T cells, follicular T cells and NK cells [41,75,76,77,78,79,80]. The cytoplasmic tail contains an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) and an immunoglobulin tail tyrosine (ITT)-like motif, which are highly conserved between mouse and human [41,51,75,76]. Similar to DNAM-1, TIGIT binds to CD112 and CD155. TIGIT also binds to CD113, another member of the Nectin family (Figure 1) [23,51,81].
It has been suggested that the combined effects of TIGIT signaling through these pathways inhibit cytotoxicity, granule polarization and cytokine secretion in NK cells [41,82,83]. On T cells, the inhibitory effect of TIGIT was initially thought to be indirectly mediated by the induction of tolerogenic dendritic cells [51]. It was later shown that TIGIT can also directly inhibit T cell activation, proliferation and acquisition of effector functions by targeting molecules in the TCR signaling pathway such as CD3ε and PLCγ [75,78].

3.3. TACTILE

Human TACTILE, also known as CD96, was discovered in 1992 [84] and it has been investigated to a lesser extent compared to DNAM-1 or TIGIT. It is a member of the Ig superfamily whose expression is almost restricted to T and NK cells [84]. Both human and mouse TACTILE contains an ITIM-like domain in its cytoplasmic portion that mediates inhibitory signaling after engagement with its ligand. Human TACTILE also contains a YXXM motif similar to that of several activating receptors such as NKG2D, however its functional relevance is poorly understood [26]. TACTILE is constitutively expressed on resting human and murine NK cells and mediates NK cell-target cell adhesion by interacting with CD155 [40]. In addition, it has been shown that TACTILE also binds to CD111 [23,49,85] (Figure 1).
In mice, TACTILE binding to CD155 inhibits IFN-γ production [64]. In contrast, human TACTILE seems to have an enhancing effect in NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity [40]. However, Staniestsky et al. failed to confirm these results [41] and in vitro blocking experiments did not demonstrate a role of human TACTILE in NK cell killing of ovarian carcinoma cells [68] or myeloma cell lines [45]. Furthermore, no evidence of a role of TACTILE in the lysis of different tumor cells was found in mice [85].
Despite the results obtained in preclinical models, the role of TACTILE in the modulation of the effector function of human NK cells remains unclear and discrepant results have been reported. The functional discrepancies between human and murine TACTILE relate to the structural differences. The presence of the activating YXXM motif in human but not in mouse TACTILE may result in functional divergences that require further analysis. It has been suggested that human TACTILE exerts inhibitory or activating functions depending on the cell type [26]. Split variants of the second domain of human TACTILE have been described with different binding affinity to CD155 that may also have significant functional relevance [86]. In mouse models, TACTILE acts as a negative regulator of NK cell function and blockade of TACTILE with antibodies, alone or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1, promoted antitumor responses [40,64,87]. However, in humans, the role of TACTILE in controlling the activity of NK cells is unclear, since this receptor has motifs of activation and inhibition that could mediate both positive and negative signals in these cells. Additional studies are required to characterize the role of TACTILE in the activation of human NK cells to use it as a checkpoint.

3.4. PVRIG

PVRIG, also termed as CD112R, was identified in 2016 [29] as a new inhibitory receptor adding more complexity to this network. PVRIG interacts with CD112 but not with CD155 and represents a novel checkpoint for human T cells [29] and NK cells [28]. PVRIG binds with high affinity to its ligand CD112 on target cells suppressing lymphocyte cytotoxic function. It has been demonstrated that PVRIG and TIGIT are nonredundant inhibitory receptors on CD8+ T cells and targeting both pathways enhances antitumor responses in vitro [88].

4. DNAM-1 and TIGIT/ PVRIG/TACTILE Axis in the Recognition of Tumor Cells by NK Cells: Blockade of TIGIT and PVRIG Checkpoints in Cancer Immunotherapy

The regulation of NK cells, and also of T cells, by DNAM-1, TIGIT, PVRIG and TACTILE receptors is achieved by complex interactions with their ligands in tumor cells that, depending on the number of inhibitory receptors involved and their binding affinity for CD155 and CD112 on the target cells, will counteract or not the activation signals mediated through the DNAM-1 receptor.
The axis of DNAM-1 and TIGIT/PVRIG/TACTILE, in which shared ligands and different receptor-ligands affinities regulate the immune response, represents a novel checkpoint for improving immune responses against cancer. This balance between inhibitory and activating signals is mediated through cell signaling after the recognition of their ligands that are usually upregulated in tumor cells [24,54,89]. CD155 interacts with DNAM-1, TIGIT and TACTILE and CD112 with DNAM-1, TIGIT and PVRIG. This axis represents a promising target for cancer immunotherapy, but its regulation remains largely unknown.
Studies on the affinity of these receptors for their ligands (Figure 2a) showed that TIGIT has a higher affinity than DNAM-1 for CD155 and competes for binding to CD155, which interrupts the activation mediated by DNAM-1 and delivers an inhibitory signal to T cells [51]. TACTILE also binds to CD155 with greater affinity than DNAM-1 but lower than TIGIT [87]. In addition, it has been proposed that TIGIT can disrupt DNAM-1 mediated co-stimulation of T cells by interfering with cis-homodimerization of DNAM-1 [90]. Thus, various mechanisms are involved in TIGIT mediated inhibition of T cells [24].
Recently, it has been described the expression of TIGIT in different murine tumor cell lines (colon cancer, breast cancer, melanoma and lung carcinoma) and human colorectal cancer that delivers inhibitory signals to CD8+ T cells and NK cells by engaging with CD155 expressed on these immune cells. These results suggest a new pathway for TIGIT-mediated inhibition throughout the interaction of TIGIT expressed in tumor cells with CD155 expressed in immune cells (Figure 2b). These findings support a role of tumor intrinsic TIGIT, helping tumor escape by suppressing the function of NK and CD8+ T cells. Interestingly, TIGIT or CD155 blockade with antibodies restores NK and CD8+ T cell function further supporting that targeting TIGIT-CD155 interaction could be useful for immunotherapy of cancer [91].
The effect of immunotherapy with checkpoint blockade has been shown to induce long-lasting responses in some patients with solid and hematological tumors. However, blocking a single receptor as monotherapy will unlikely elicit an effective immune response whereas combinatorial approaches should be tested to improve immune responses against cancer (Figure 3). In a similar way the recognition of CD112 on tumor cells by PVRIG expressed on T and NK cell is considered as a novel checkpoint [29]. On the contrary, although TACTILE has one intracellular inhibitory motif and transmit inhibitory signals in some experimental conditions, it also has an YxxM activating motif. Therefore, this receptor has not been considered as a therapeutic target in the immunotherapy of cancer in humans and until now anti-TACTILE antibodies have not been considered for evaluation in clinical trials. NK cell-based immunotherapies will also benefit from approaches that reverse the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In addition, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) technology can also be used to generate novel CAR-NK cells for adoptive therapies in order to overcome the NK cell suppression by inhibitory receptors [92]. CAR engineered NK cell lines against several antigens for solid tumors that specifically lyse target cells in vitro and with efficiency in preclinical studies have been generated, as reviewed by Nayyar et al. [93].

4.1. Anti-TIGIT mAbs in Clinical Trials for Checkpoint Cancer Immunotherapy

TIGIT has emerged as a novel inhibitory receptor that can be targeted by mAb and represents a new checkpoint for the development of immunotherapy strategies against cancer. In mouse models, TIGIT in combination with PD-1 blockade has been shown to act synergistically to enhance CD8+ T cell function [90]. TIGIT blockade has been shown to enhance NK cell functional capacity [27]. Anti-TIGIT mAb with different isotypes and mutant forms designed to eliminate Fc-FcγR interactions, that have been shown to be deleterious in blocking PD-1 [94], have been developed for their potential as checkpoint inhibitors. Many of the clinical trials designed to analyze the significance of anti-TIGIT antibodies in cancer immunotherapy use them in combination with antibodies blocking other checkpoints, in particular PD-1/PD-1L interactions. Expression of PD-1 in NK cells is restricted to a subset of functionally exhausted NK cells characterized for being CD56dim NKG2A–KIR+CD57+ [20]. In a recent study in murine solid tumors, the presence of NK cells was shown to be critical for the therapeutic effects of blockade of TIGIT checkpoints or the combined blockade of TIGIT and PD-1/PD-1L checkpoints [27], supporting the relevance of the TIGIT signaling pathway in the immune escape of tumor cells. In addition, these results also support that targeting different pathways by using combined anti-tumor immunotherapy strategies can be critical to revert NK cell defective capacity to eliminate cancer cells (reviewed in [93]).
The characteristics of phase 1 or phase 2 clinical trials using anti-TIGIT mAbs alone or in combination with different anti-PD-1/PD-1L mAbs, including the recruitment status (as in April 2019) and the estimated completion date, are summarized below and in Table 1.
Etigilimab (OMP-313M32) is an anti-TIGIT IgG1 mAb developed by OncoMed Pharmaceuticals. It is under study in a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT031119428) in solid tumors as monotherapy or in combination with Nivolumab (anti-PD-1).
Tiragolumab (also known as MTIG7192A and RG6058), is an anti-TIGIT mAb developed by Genentech/Roche, is a fully human IgG1 antibody that binds to human TIGIT. A phase 2 clinical trial (NCT03563716) is evaluating its use alone or in combination with Atezolizumab (anti-PD-1L) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
AB154, an IgG4 anti-TIGIT mAb developed by Arcus Bioscience, is included in a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03628677) to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and preliminary efficacy in advanced solid tumors as monotherapy or combined with AB122 (anti-PD-1).
MK-7684 (IgG1) anti-TIGIT mAb was developed by Merck Sharp & Dohme and it is being evaluated in phase 1 in patients with advanced solid tumors either as monotherapy or in combination with Pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1).
In addition, two mAbs with mutated Fc to avoid binding to FcγR are under study:
BMS-986207 (anti-TIGIT IgG1, FcγR-null) from Bristol-Myers Squibb is evaluated in a phase 1/2 clinical trial (NCT02913313), as monotherapy or in combination with Nivolumab (anti-PD-1) in advanced solid tumors.
ASP8374 (anti-TIGIT IgG1, FcγR-null) developed by Astellas Pharma; Potenza Therapeutics. It leads to the activation of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte CTL mediated response against cancer cells. There are currently two clinical trials with participants with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic solid tumor malignancies, a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03260322) evaluating the tolerability and safety profile of ASP8374 when administered as a single agent and in combination with Pembrolizumab and a phase 1 study (NCT03945253) to evaluate the tolerability and safety profile and to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of ASP8374.

4.2. PVRIG as a Novel Checkpoint for Cancer Immunotherapy

PVRIG is a recently identified inhibitory receptor that interacts with CD112 competing with DNAM-1. Blocking PVRIG interaction with CD112 with antibodies enhanced T cell stimulation [29]. In humans, blockade of PVRIG and TIGIT has been shown to enhance trastuzumab-mediated NK cell response against breast cancer [28]. Antibody dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) mediated by NK cells is one of the major mechanisms of action for trastuzumab against Her2 positive breast cancer. It has been shown that, among the possible strategies to enhance trastuzumab-mediated ADCC by NK cells, blockade of PVRIG enhances trastuzumab-triggered anti-breast cancer response [28], therefore supporting that this receptor plays a suppressive function on NK cells. Based on these evidences, PVRIG can be considered a therapeutic target and its blockade in vivo could imply a novel approach to improve trastuzumab efficacy in human breast cancer. Up to now there is only one anti-PVRIG antibody used in a clinical trial for cancer immunotherapy, COM701, that is being tested in a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03667716) to evaluate its safety, tolerability and preliminary clinical activity, as monotherapy or in combination with Nivolumab, in patients with advanced solid tumors including non-small cell lung cancer, ovarian, breast and endometrial cancer.

5. Conclusions

Considering the importance of the immune regulatory network mediated by DNAM-1, TIGIT, TACTILE and PVRIG that involve Nectin and Nectin-like ligands, it is of interest to understand the mechanisms governing this axis and the factors contributing to the inhibitory/activating outcome after engagement. NK cells are now being considered a promising therapeutic target for cancer immunotherapy, due to its peculiar ability to kill diverse tumor cells. Thus, understanding of the input of immune checkpoints in the regulation of NK cell functions and determining the contribution of NK cells to the clinical interest of blockade of these checkpoints will open the door for the discovery of new therapies for different types of cancers.

Funding

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, grant number SAF2017-87538-R (to R.T.); the Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministry of Health, grant number PI16/01615 (to C.A.); Regional funds from Junta de Extremadura, Spain, grant number IB16164 (to R.T.). The APC was funded by Junta de Extremadura (Spain), grant number GR18085 to INPATT research group (CTS040). All grants were cofinanced by European Regional Development Funds “Una manera de hacer Europa”.

Acknowledgments

The authors apologize to those researchers whose work could not be cited.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ribas, A.; Wolchok, J.D. Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science 2018, 359, 1350–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Brahmer, J.R.; Tykodi, S.S.; Chow, L.Q.; Hwu, W.J.; Topalian, S.L.; Hwu, P.; Drake, C.G.; Camacho, L.H.; Kauh, J.; Odunsi, K.; et al. Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 2455–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Topalian, S.L.; Hodi, F.S.; Brahmer, J.R.; Gettinger, S.N.; Smith, D.C.; McDermott, D.F.; Powderly, J.D.; Carvajal, R.D.; Sosman, J.A.; Atkins, M.B.; et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 2443–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hodi, F.S.; O’Day, S.J.; McDermott, D.F.; Weber, R.W.; Sosman, J.A.; Haanen, J.B.; Gonzalez, R.; Robert, C.; Schadendorf, D.; Hassel, J.C.; et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zang, X.; Allison, J.P. The B7 family and cancer therapy: Costimulation and coinhibition. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 5271–5279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Borrego, F.; Kabat, J.; Kim, D.K.; Lieto, L.; Maasho, K.; Pena, J.; Solana, R.; Coligan, J.E. Structure and function of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I specific receptors expressed on human natural killer (NK) cells. Mol. Immunol. 2002, 38, 637–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pende, D.; Spaggiari, G.M.; Marcenaro, S.; Martini, S.; Rivera, P.; Capobianco, A.; Falco, M.; Lanino, E.; Pierri, I.; Zambello, R.; et al. Analysis of the receptor-ligand interactions in the natural killer-mediated lysis of freshly isolated myeloid or lymphoblastic leukemias: Evidence for the involvement of the Poliovirus receptor (CD155) and Nectin-2 (CD112). Blood 2005, 105, 2066–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Juelke, K.; Killig, M.; Luetke-Eversloh, M.; Parente, E.; Gruen, J.; Morandi, B.; Ferlazzo, G.; Thiel, A.; Schmitt-Knosalla, I.; Romagnani, C. CD62L expression identifies a unique subset of polyfunctional CD56dim NK cells. Blood 2010, 116, 1299–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Freud, A.G.; Mundy-Bosse, B.L.; Yu, J.; Caligiuri, M.A. The Broad Spectrum of Human Natural Killer Cell Diversity. Immunity 2017, 47, 820–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sivori, S.; Vacca, P.; Del, Z.G.; Munari, E.; Mingari, M.C.; Moretta, L. Human NK cells: Surface receptors, inhibitory checkpoints, and translational applications. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2019, 16, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Barrow, A.D.; Colonna, M. Exploiting NK Cell Surveillance Pathways for Cancer Therapy. Cancers 2019, 11, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ruggeri, L.; Capanni, M.; Urbani, E.; Perruccio, K.; Shlomchik, W.D.; Tosti, A.; Posati, S.; Rogaia, D.; Frassoni, F.; Aversa, F.; et al. Effectiveness of donor natural killer cell alloreactivity in mismatched hematopoietic transplants. Science 2002, 295, 2097–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ruggeri, L.; Mancusi, A.; Burchielli, E.; Capanni, M.; Carotti, A.; Aloisi, T.; Aversa, F.; Martelli, M.F.; Velardi, A. NK cell alloreactivity and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2008, 40, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cooley, S.; Parham, P.; Miller, J.S. Strategies to activate NK cells to prevent relapse and induce remission following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2018, 131, 1053–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lorenzo-Herrero, S.; Lopez-Soto, A.; Sordo-Bahamonde, C.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, A.P.; Vitale, M.; Gonzalez, S. NK Cell-Based Immunotherapy in Cancer Metastasis. Cancers 2018, 11, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lopez-Soto, A.; Gonzalez, S.; Smyth, M.J.; Galluzzi, L. Control of Metastasis by NK Cells. Cancer Cell 2017, 32, 135–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Habif, G.; Crinier, A.; Andre, P.; Vivier, E.; Narni-Mancinelli, E. Targeting natural killer cells in solid tumors. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2019, 16, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ndhlovu, L.C.; Lopez-Verges, S.; Barbour, J.D.; Jones, R.B.; Jha, A.R.; Long, B.R.; Schoeffler, E.C.; Fujita, T.; Nixon, D.F.; Lanier, L.L. Tim-3 marks human natural killer cell maturation and suppresses cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Blood 2012, 119, 3734–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sun, H.; Sun, C.; Xiao, W. Expression regulation of co-inhibitory molecules on human natural killer cells in response to cytokine stimulations. Cytokine 2014, 65, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pesce, S.; Greppi, M.; Tabellini, G.; Rampinelli, F.; Parolini, S.; Olive, D.; Moretta, L.; Moretta, A.; Marcenaro, E. Identification of a subset of human natural killer cells expressing high levels of programmed death 1: A phenotypic and functional characterization. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 139, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Beldi-Ferchiou, A.; Caillat-Zucman, S. Control of NK Cell Activation by Immune Checkpoint Molecules. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kim, N.; Kim, H.S. Targeting Checkpoint Receptors and Molecules for Therapeutic Modulation of Natural Killer Cells. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Martinet, L.; Smyth, M.J. Balancing natural killer cell activation through paired receptors. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 15, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dougall, W.C.; Kurtulus, S.; Smyth, M.J.; Anderson, A.C. TIGIT and CD96: New checkpoint receptor targets for cancer immunotherapy. Immunol. Rev. 2017, 276, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. de Andrade, L.F.; Smyth, M.J.; Martinet, L. DNAM-1 control of natural killer cells functions through nectin and nectin-like proteins. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2014, 92, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Georgiev, H.; Ravens, I.; Papadogianni, G.; Bernhardt, G. Coming of Age: CD96 Emerges as Modulator of Immune Responses. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, Q.; Bi, J.; Zheng, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Wu, W.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Q.; Peng, H.; Wei, H.; et al. Blockade of the checkpoint receptor TIGIT prevents NK cell exhaustion and elicits potent anti-tumor immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Xu, F.; Sunderland, A.; Zhou, Y.; Schulick, R.D.; Edil, B.H.; Zhu, Y. Blockade of CD112R and TIGIT signaling sensitizes human natural killer cell functions. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2017, 66, 1367–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhu, Y.; Paniccia, A.; Schulick, A.C.; Chen, W.; Koenig, M.R.; Byers, J.T.; Yao, S.; Bevers, S.; Edil, B.H. Identification of CD112R as a novel checkpoint for human T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2016, 213, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Martinet, L.; Ferrari De, A.L.; Guillerey, C.; Lee, J.S.; Liu, J.; Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes, F.; Hutchinson, D.S.; Kolesnik, T.B.; Nicholson, S.E.; Huntington, N.D.; et al. DNAM-1 expression marks an alternative program of NK cell maturation. Cell Rep. 2015, 11, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Takai, Y.; Irie, K.; Shimizu, K.; Sakisaka, T.; Ikeda, W. Nectins and nectin-like molecules: Roles in cell adhesion, migration, and polarization. Cancer Sci. 2003, 94, 655–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fuchs, A.; Colonna, M. The role of NK cell recognition of nectin and nectin-like proteins in tumor immunosurveillance. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2006, 16, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chan, C.J.; Andrews, D.M.; Smyth, M.J. Receptors that interact with nectin and nectin-like proteins in the immunosurveillance and immunotherapy of cancer. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2012, 24, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Stanietsky, N.; Mandelboim, O. Paired NK cell receptors controlling NK cytotoxicity. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584, 4895–4900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Mendelsohn, C.L.; Wimmer, E.; Racaniello, V.R. Cellular receptor for poliovirus: Molecular cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of a new member of the immunoglobulin superfamily. Cell 1989, 56, 855–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. He, Y.; Bowman, V.D.; Mueller, S.; Bator, C.M.; Bella, J.; Peng, X.; Baker, T.S.; Wimmer, E.; Kuhn, R.J.; Rossmann, M.G. Interaction of the poliovirus receptor with poliovirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Sloan, K.E.; Eustace, B.K.; Stewart, J.K.; Zehetmeier, C.; Torella, C.; Simeone, M.; Roy, J.E.; Unger, C.; Louis, D.N.; Ilag, L.L.; et al. CD155/PVR plays a key role in cell motility during tumor cell invasion and migration. BMC Cancer 2004, 4, 73–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gao, J.; Zheng, Q.; Xin, N.; Wang, W.; Zhao, C. CD155, an onco-immunologic molecule in human tumors. Cancer Sci. 2017, 108, 1934–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tahara-Hanaoka, S.; Shibuya, K.; Onoda, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yamazaki, S.; Miyamoto, A.; Honda, S.; Lanier, L.L.; Shibuya, A. Functional characterization of DNAM-1 (CD226) interaction with its ligands PVR (CD155) and nectin-2 (PRR-2/CD112). Int. Immunol. 2004, 16, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fuchs, A.; Cella, M.; Giurisato, E.; Shaw, A.S.; Colonna, M. Cutting edge: CD96 (tactile) promotes NK cell-target cell adhesion by interacting with the poliovirus receptor (CD155). J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 3994–3998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stanietsky, N.; Simic, H.; Arapovic, J.; Toporik, A.; Levy, O.; Novik, A.; Levine, Z.; Beiman, M.; Dassa, L.; Achdout, H.; et al. The interaction of TIGIT with PVR and PVRL2 inhibits human NK cell cytotoxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 17858–17863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Lopez, M.; Aoubala, M.; Jordier, F.; Isnardon, D.; Gomez, S.; Dubreuil, P. The human poliovirus receptor related 2 protein is a new hematopoietic/endothelial homophilic adhesion molecule. Blood 1998, 92, 4602–4611. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Sanchez-Correa, B.; Gayoso, I.; Bergua, J.M.; Casado, J.G.; Morgado, S.; Solana, R.; Tarazona, R. Decreased expression of DNAM-1 on NK cells from acute myeloid leukemia patients. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2012, 90, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Casado, J.G.; Pawelec, G.; Morgado, S.; Sanchez-Correa, B.; Delgado, E.; Gayoso, I.; Duran, E.; Solana, R.; Tarazona, R. Expression of adhesion molecules and ligands for activating and costimulatory receptors involved in cell-mediated cytotoxicity in a large panel of human melanoma cell lines. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2009, 58, 1517–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. El-Sherbiny, Y.M.; Meade, J.L.; Holmes, T.D.; McGonagle, D.; Mackie, S.L.; Morgan, A.W.; Cook, G.; Feyler, S.; Richards, S.J.; Davies, F.E.; et al. The requirement for DNAM-1, NKG2D, and NKp46 in the natural killer cell-mediated killing of myeloma cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 8444–8449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Miao, X.; Yang, Z.L.; Xiong, L.; Zou, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Li, J.; Liang, L.; Chen, M.; Chen, S. Nectin-2 and DDX3 are biomarkers for metastasis and poor prognosis of squamous cell/adenosquamous carcinomas and adenocarcinoma of gallbladder. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2013, 6, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Pende, D.; Bottino, C.; Castriconi, R.; Cantoni, C.; Marcenaro, S.; Rivera, P.; Spaggiari, G.M.; Dondero, A.; Carnemolla, B.; Reymond, N.; et al. PVR (CD155) and Nectin-2 (CD112) as ligands of the human DNAM-1 (CD226) activating receptor: Involvement in tumor cell lysis. Mol. Immunol. 2005, 42, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Geraghty, R.J.; Krummenacher, C.; Cohen, G.H.; Eisenberg, R.J.; Spear, P.G. Entry of alphaherpesviruses mediated by poliovirus receptor-related protein 1 and poliovirus receptor. Science 1998, 280, 1618–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Holmes, V.M.; Maluquer de, M.C.; Richards, P.T.; Roldan, J.; Bhargava, A.K.; Orange, J.S.; Krummenacher, C. Interaction between nectin-1 and the human natural killer cell receptor CD96. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Satoh-Horikawa, K.; Nakanishi, H.; Takahashi, K.; Miyahara, M.; Nishimura, M.; Tachibana, K.; Mizoguchi, A.; Takai, Y. Nectin-3, a new member of immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecules that shows homophilic and heterophilic cell-cell adhesion activities. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 10291–10299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yu, X.; Harden, K.; Gonzalez, L.C.; Francesco, M.; Chiang, E.; Irving, B.; Tom, I.; Ivelja, S.; Refino, C.J.; Clark, H.; et al. The surface protein TIGIT suppresses T cell activation by promoting the generation of mature immunoregulatory dendritic cells. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Burns, G.F.; Triglia, T.; Werkmeister, J.A.; Begley, C.G.; Boyd, A.W. TLiSA1, a human T lineage-specific activation antigen involved in the differentiation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and anomalous killer cells from their precursors. J. Exp. Med. 1985, 161, 1063–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Shibuya, A.; Campbell, D.; Hannum, C.; Yssel, H.; Franz-Bacon, K.; McClanahan, T.; Kitamura, T.; Nicholl, J.; Sutherland, G.R.; Lanier, L.L.; et al. DNAM-1, a novel adhesion molecule involved in the cytolytic function of T lymphocytes. Immunity 1996, 4, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bottino, C.; Castriconi, R.; Pende, D.; Rivera, P.; Nanni, M.; Carnemolla, B.; Cantoni, C.; Grassi, J.; Marcenaro, S.; Reymond, N.; et al. Identification of PVR (CD155) and Nectin-2 (CD112) as cell surface ligands for the human DNAM-1 (CD226) activating molecule. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 198, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wagner, A.K.; Kadri, N.; Snall, J.; Brodin, P.; Gilfillan, S.; Colonna, M.; Bernhardt, G.; Hoglund, P.; Karre, K.; Chambers, B.J. Expression of CD226 is associated to but not required for NK cell education. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Shibuya, K.; Lanier, L.L.; Phillips, J.H.; Ochs, H.D.; Shimizu, K.; Nakayama, E.; Nakauchi, H.; Shibuya, A. Physical and functional association of LFA-1 with DNAM-1 adhesion molecule. Immunity 1999, 11, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Enqvist, M.; Ask, E.H.; Forslund, E.; Carlsten, M.; Abrahamsen, G.; Beziat, V.; Andersson, S.; Schaffer, M.; Spurkland, A.; Bryceson, Y.; et al. Coordinated expression of DNAM-1 and LFA-1 in educated NK cells. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 4518–4527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Campos, C.; Lopez, N.; Pera, A.; Gordillo, J.J.; Hassouneh, F.; Tarazona, R.; Solana, R. Expression of NKp30, NKp46 and DNAM-1 activating receptors on resting and IL-2 activated NK cells from healthy donors according to CMV-serostatus and age. Biogerontology 2015, 16, 671–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Solana, R.; Campos, C.; Pera, A.; Tarazona, R. Shaping of NK cell subsets by aging. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2014, 29, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Han, B.; Mao, F.Y.; Zhao, Y.L.; Lv, Y.P.; Teng, Y.S.; Duan, M.; Chen, W.; Cheng, P.; Wang, T.T.; Liang, Z.Y.; et al. Altered NKp30, NKp46, NKG2D, and DNAM-1 Expression on Circulating NK Cells Is Associated with Tumor Progression in Human Gastric Cancer. J. Immunol. Res. 2018, 2018, 6248590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Carlsten, M.; Baumann, B.C.; Simonsson, M.; Jadersten, M.; Forsblom, A.M.; Hammarstedt, C.; Bryceson, Y.T.; Ljunggren, H.G.; Hellstrom-Lindberg, E.; Malmberg, K.J. Reduced DNAM-1 expression on bone marrow NK cells associated with impaired killing of CD34+ blasts in myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia 2010, 24, 1607–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Iguchi-Manaka, A.; Kai, H.; Yamashita, Y.; Shibata, K.; Tahara-Hanaoka, S.; Honda, S.; Yasui, T.; Kikutani, H.; Shibuya, K.; Shibuya, A. Accelerated tumor growth in mice deficient in DNAM-1 receptor. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 2959–2964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Lakshmikanth, T.; Burke, S.; Ali, T.H.; Kimpfler, S.; Ursini, F.; Ruggeri, L.; Capanni, M.; Umansky, V.; Paschen, A.; Sucker, A.; et al. NCRs and DNAM-1 mediate NK cell recognition and lysis of human and mouse melanoma cell lines in vitro and in vivo. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 1251–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Chan, C.J.; Martinet, L.; Gilfillan, S.; Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes, F.; Chow, M.T.; Town, L.; Ritchie, D.S.; Colonna, M.; Andrews, D.M.; Smyth, M.J. The receptors CD96 and CD226 oppose each other in the regulation of natural killer cell functions. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chan, C.J.; Andrews, D.M.; McLaughlin, N.M.; Yagita, H.; Gilfillan, S.; Colonna, M.; Smyth, M.J. DNAM-1/CD155 interactions promote cytokine and NK cell-mediated suppression of poorly immunogenic melanoma metastases. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 902–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sanchez-Correa, B.; Morgado, S.; Gayoso, I.; Bergua, J.M.; Casado, J.G.; Arcos, M.J.; Bengochea, M.L.; Duran, E.; Solana, R.; Tarazona, R. Human NK cells in acute myeloid leukaemia patients: Analysis of NK cell-activating receptors and their ligands. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2011, 60, 1195–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Castriconi, R.; Dondero, A.; Corrias, M.V.; Lanino, E.; Pende, D.; Moretta, L.; Bottino, C.; Moretta, A. Natural killer cell-mediated killing of freshly isolated neuroblastoma cells: Critical role of DNAX accessory molecule-1-poliovirus receptor interaction. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 9180–9184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Carlsten, M.; Bjorkstrom, N.K.; Norell, H.; Bryceson, Y.; van, H.T.; Baumann, B.C.; Hanson, M.; Schedvins, K.; Kiessling, R.; Ljunggren, H.G.; et al. DNAX accessory molecule-1 mediated recognition of freshly isolated ovarian carcinoma by resting natural killer cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 1317–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Carlsten, M.; Norell, H.; Bryceson, Y.T.; Poschke, I.; Schedvins, K.; Ljunggren, H.G.; Kiessling, R.; Malmberg, K.J. Primary human tumor cells expressing CD155 impair tumor targeting by down-regulating DNAM-1 on NK cells. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 4921–4930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Soriani, A.; Zingoni, A.; Cerboni, C.; Iannitto, M.L.; Ricciardi, M.R.; Di Gialleonardo, V.; Cippitelli, M.; Fionda, C.; Petrucci, M.T.; Guarini, A.; et al. ATM-ATR-dependent up-regulation of DNAM-1 and NKG2D ligands on multiple myeloma cells by therapeutic agents results in enhanced NK-cell susceptibility and is associated with a senescent phenotype. Blood 2009, 113, 3503–3511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pende, D.; Castriconi, R.; Romagnani, P.; Spaggiari, G.M.; Marcenaro, S.; Dondero, A.; Lazzeri, E.; Lasagni, L.; Martini, S.; Rivera, P.; et al. Expression of the DNAM-1 ligands, Nectin-2 (CD112) and poliovirus receptor (CD155), on dendritic cells: Relevance for natural killer-dendritic cell interaction. Blood 2006, 107, 2030–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ardolino, M.; Zingoni, A.; Cerboni, C.; Cecere, F.; Soriani, A.; Iannitto, M.L.; Santoni, A. DNAM-1 ligand expression on Ag-stimulated T lymphocytes is mediated by ROS-dependent activation of DNA-damage response: Relevance for NK-T cell interaction. Blood 2011, 117, 4778–4786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sun, J.C.; Beilke, J.N.; Lanier, L.L. Adaptive immune features of natural killer cells. Nature 2009, 457, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Nabekura, T.; Kanaya, M.; Shibuya, A.; Fu, G.; Gascoigne, N.R.; Lanier, L.L. Costimulatory molecule DNAM-1 is essential for optimal differentiation of memory natural killer cells during mouse cytomegalovirus infection. Immunity 2014, 40, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Levin, S.D.; Taft, D.W.; Brandt, C.S.; Bucher, C.; Howard, E.D.; Chadwick, E.M.; Johnston, J.; Hammond, A.; Bontadelli, K.; Ardourel, D.; et al. Vstm3 is a member of the CD28 family and an important modulator of T-cell function. Eur. J. Immunol. 2011, 41, 902–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Boles, K.S.; Vermi, W.; Facchetti, F.; Fuchs, A.; Wilson, T.J.; Diacovo, T.G.; Cella, M.; Colonna, M. A novel molecular interaction for the adhesion of follicular CD4 T cells to follicular DC. Eur. J. Immunol. 2009, 39, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Joller, N.; Lozano, E.; Burkett, P.R.; Patel, B.; Xiao, S.; Zhu, C.; Xia, J.; Tan, T.G.; Sefik, E.; Yajnik, V.; et al. Treg cells expressing the coinhibitory molecule TIGIT selectively inhibit proinflammatory Th1 and Th17 cell responses. Immunity 2014, 40, 569–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Joller, N.; Hafler, J.P.; Brynedal, B.; Kassam, N.; Spoerl, S.; Levin, S.D.; Sharpe, A.H.; Kuchroo, V.K. Cutting edge: TIGIT has T cell-intrinsic inhibitory functions. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 1338–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Joller, N.; Kuchroo, V.K. Tim-3, Lag-3, and TIGIT. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017, 410, 127–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Anderson, A.C.; Joller, N.; Kuchroo, V.K. Lag-3, Tim-3, and TIGIT: Co-inhibitory Receptors with Specialized Functions in Immune Regulation. Immunity 2016, 44, 989–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Stanietsky, N.; Rovis, T.L.; Glasner, A.; Seidel, E.; Tsukerman, P.; Yamin, R.; Enk, J.; Jonjic, S.; Mandelboim, O. Mouse TIGIT inhibits NK-cell cytotoxicity upon interaction with PVR. Eur. J. Immunol. 2013, 43, 2138–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Li, M.; Xia, P.; Du, Y.; Liu, S.; Huang, G.; Chen, J.; Zhang, H.; Hou, N.; Cheng, X.; Zhou, L.; et al. T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) receptor/poliovirus receptor (PVR) ligand engagement suppresses interferon-gamma production of natural killer cells via beta-arrestin 2-mediated negative signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 17647–17657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Liu, S.; Zhang, H.; Li, M.; Hu, D.; Li, C.; Ge, B.; Jin, B.; Fan, Z. Recruitment of Grb2 and SHIP1 by the ITT-like motif of TIGIT suppresses granule polarization and cytotoxicity of NK cells. Cell Death. Differ. 2013, 20, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wang, P.L.; O’Farrell, S.; Clayberger, C.; Krensky, A.M. Identification and molecular cloning of tactile. A novel human T cell activation antigen that is a member of the Ig gene superfamily. J. Immunol. 1992, 148, 2600–2608. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Seth, S.; Maier, M.K.; Qiu, Q.; Ravens, I.; Kremmer, E.; Forster, R.; Bernhardt, G. The murine pan T cell marker CD96 is an adhesion receptor for CD155 and nectin-1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 364, 959–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Meyer, D.; Seth, S.; Albrecht, J.; Maier, M.K.; Du, P.L.; Ravens, I.; Dreyer, L.; Burger, R.; Gramatzki, M.; Schwinzer, R.; et al. CD96 interaction with CD155 via its first Ig-like domain is modulated by alternative splicing or mutations in distal Ig-like domains. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 2235–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Blake, S.J.; Dougall, W.C.; Miles, J.J.; Teng, M.W.; Smyth, M.J. Molecular Pathways: Targeting CD96 and TIGIT for Cancer Immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 5183–5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Whelan, S.; Ophir, E.; Kotturi, M.F.; Levy, O.; Ganguly, S.; Leung, L.; Vaknin, I.; Kumar, S.; Dassa, L.; Hansen, K.; et al. PVRIG and PVRL2 Are Induced in Cancer and Inhibit CD8(+) T-cell Function. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2019, 7, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Stein, N.; Tsukerman, P.; Mandelboim, O. The paired receptors TIGIT and DNAM-1 as targets for therapeutic antibodies. Hum. Antibodies 2017, 25, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Johnston, R.J.; Comps-Agrar, L.; Hackney, J.; Yu, X.; Huseni, M.; Yang, Y.; Park, S.; Javinal, V.; Chiu, H.; Irving, B.; et al. The immunoreceptor TIGIT regulates antitumor and antiviral CD8(+) T cell effector function. Cancer Cell 2014, 26, 923–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhou, X.M.; Li, W.Q.; Wu, Y.H.; Han, L.; Cao, X.G.; Yang, X.M.; Wang, H.F.; Zhao, W.S.; Zhai, W.J.; Qi, Y.M.; et al. Intrinsic Expression of Immune Checkpoint Molecule TIGIT Could Help Tumor Growth in vivo by Suppressing the Function of NK and CD8(+) T Cells. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Barrow, A.D.; Colonna, M. Tailoring Natural Killer cell immunotherapy to the tumour microenvironment. Semin. Immunol. 2017, 31, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Nayyar, G.; Chu, Y.; Cairo, M.S. Overcoming Resistance to Natural Killer Cell Based Immunotherapies for Solid Tumors. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Dahan, R.; Sega, E.; Engelhardt, J.; Selby, M.; Korman, A.J.; Ravetch, J.V. FcgammaRs Modulate the Anti-tumor Activity of Antibodies Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 Axis. Cancer Cell 2015, 28, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 11 00877 g001 550
Figure 1. Natural killer (NK) cell activating and inhibitory receptors and their ligands on tumor cells. Inhibitory receptors are indicated in dark blue and activating receptors in light blue. While mouse TACTILE expresses only intracytoplasmic inhibitory motifs, human TACTILE expresses both inhibitory and activating motifs (indicated with dotted dark blue-light blue arrows).
Figure 1. Natural killer (NK) cell activating and inhibitory receptors and their ligands on tumor cells. Inhibitory receptors are indicated in dark blue and activating receptors in light blue. While mouse TACTILE expresses only intracytoplasmic inhibitory motifs, human TACTILE expresses both inhibitory and activating motifs (indicated with dotted dark blue-light blue arrows).
Cancers 11 00877 g001
Cancers 11 00877 g002 550
Figure 2. DNAM-1/TIGIT/PVRIG/TACTILE network and its ligands CD155 and CD112. (a) DNAM-1, TACTILE, TIGIT and PVRIG on NK and T cells interact with their ligands on tumor cells with different affinities and mediate activating and inhibitory signaling on cytotoxic cells. (b) TIGIT expressed on tumor cells may inhibit NK and T cells by interaction with CD155.
Figure 2. DNAM-1/TIGIT/PVRIG/TACTILE network and its ligands CD155 and CD112. (a) DNAM-1, TACTILE, TIGIT and PVRIG on NK and T cells interact with their ligands on tumor cells with different affinities and mediate activating and inhibitory signaling on cytotoxic cells. (b) TIGIT expressed on tumor cells may inhibit NK and T cells by interaction with CD155.
Cancers 11 00877 g002
Cancers 11 00877 g003 550
Figure 3. DNAM-1/TIGIT/ PVRIG/TACTILE axis in the recognition of tumor cells by NK cells. (a) The activation signals mediated by DNAM-1 (represented in yellow) recognition of its ligands, CD155 (represented in light blue) and CD112 (represented in dark blue), can be counteracted by inhibitory signaling through TIGIT and PVRIG inhibitory receptors (represented in purple and dark grey). In humans, the role of TACTILE (represented in shaded-yellow) in this balance requires a more detailed analysis. (b) Overexpression of DNAM-1 can induce lysis of some tumor cells but fails to eliminate the tumor. (c) TIGIT or PVRIG checkpoint blockade improves the responses mediated by DNAM-1 contributing to tumor elimination. (d) The combination of one or two checkpoint mAbs with co-stimulatory bispecific mAb (e.g., anti-DNAM-1 × anti-CD155) may result in better antitumor immune responses by increasing the interaction of DNAM-1 with its ligands. Cells surrounded by dotted lines represent dead cells.
Figure 3. DNAM-1/TIGIT/ PVRIG/TACTILE axis in the recognition of tumor cells by NK cells. (a) The activation signals mediated by DNAM-1 (represented in yellow) recognition of its ligands, CD155 (represented in light blue) and CD112 (represented in dark blue), can be counteracted by inhibitory signaling through TIGIT and PVRIG inhibitory receptors (represented in purple and dark grey). In humans, the role of TACTILE (represented in shaded-yellow) in this balance requires a more detailed analysis. (b) Overexpression of DNAM-1 can induce lysis of some tumor cells but fails to eliminate the tumor. (c) TIGIT or PVRIG checkpoint blockade improves the responses mediated by DNAM-1 contributing to tumor elimination. (d) The combination of one or two checkpoint mAbs with co-stimulatory bispecific mAb (e.g., anti-DNAM-1 × anti-CD155) may result in better antitumor immune responses by increasing the interaction of DNAM-1 with its ligands. Cells surrounded by dotted lines represent dead cells.
Cancers 11 00877 g003
Table
Table 1. Clinical trials based on checkpoint blockade using mAbs against TIGIT.
Table 1. Clinical trials based on checkpoint blockade using mAbs against TIGIT.
Clinical Trial IdentifierCondition or Diseaseα-TIGIT mAbInterventionPhaseRecruitment Status April 2019Estimated Study Completion Date
NCT03119428Advanced Cancer, Metastatic CancerEtiligimab (OMP-313M32)OMP-313M32; OMP-313M32 + Nivolumab1Active, not recruitingOctober, 2019
NCT03563716Non-small Cell Lung CancerTiragolumab (MTIG7192A)MTIG7192A Atezolizumab; Placebo + Atezolizumab2Active, not recruitingFebruary, 2021
NCT03628677Advanced solid tumorsAB154AB154; AB154 + anti-PD1 (AB122)1RecruitingFebruary, 2020
NCT02964013Advanced solid tumorsMK-7684MK-7684; MK-7684+ Pembrolizumab1RecruitingJune, 2022
NCT02913313Advanced solid tumorsBMS-986207BMS-986207; BMS-986207 + anti-PD11/2RecruitingDecember, 2022
NCT03260322Advanced solid tumorsASP8374ASP8374; ASP8374+ Pembrolizumab1RecruitingJuly, 2021
NCT03945253Advanced solid tumorsASP8374ASP83741Not yet recruitingDecember, 2022

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sanchez-Correa, B.; Valhondo, I.; Hassouneh, F.; Lopez-Sejas, N.; Pera, A.; Bergua, J.M.; Arcos, M.J.; Bañas, H.; Casas-Avilés, I.; Durán, E.; et al. DNAM-1 and the TIGIT/PVRIG/TACTILE Axis: Novel Immune Checkpoints for Natural Killer Cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancers 2019, 11, 877. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060877

AMA Style

Sanchez-Correa B, Valhondo I, Hassouneh F, Lopez-Sejas N, Pera A, Bergua JM, Arcos MJ, Bañas H, Casas-Avilés I, Durán E, et al. DNAM-1 and the TIGIT/PVRIG/TACTILE Axis: Novel Immune Checkpoints for Natural Killer Cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancers. 2019; 11(6):877. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060877

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sanchez-Correa, Beatriz, Isabel Valhondo, Fakhri Hassouneh, Nelson Lopez-Sejas, Alejandra Pera, Juan M. Bergua, Maria Jose Arcos, Helena Bañas, Ignacio Casas-Avilés, Esther Durán, and et al. 2019. "DNAM-1 and the TIGIT/PVRIG/TACTILE Axis: Novel Immune Checkpoints for Natural Killer Cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapy" Cancers 11, no. 6: 877. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060877

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop