Next Article in Journal
Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation
Next Article in Special Issue
Association of Vitamin D Status and Physical Activity with Lipid Profile in Korean Children and Adolescents: A Population-Based Study
Previous Article in Journal
Pain during Cast Wedging of Forearm Shaft and Distal Forearm Fractures in Children Aged 3 to 12 Years—A Prospective, Observational Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Children
Volume 7
Issue 11
10.3390/children7110230
children-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Nutritional Profile of Food Advertising for School-Aged Children via Television: A Longitudinal Approach

by
Daniel Campos
1,2,*,
Mireia Escudero-Marín
1,2,
Camila M. Snitman
2,
Francisco J. Torres-Espínola
1,2,
Hatim Azaryah
1,2,
Andrés Catena
3 and
Cristina Campoy
1,2,4,5,*
1
Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Avda. Investigación 11, 18016 Granada, Spain
2
EURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
3
Mind, Brain and Behaviour International Research Centre (CIMCYC), University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain
4
Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (Ibs-GRANADA), Health Sciences Technological Park, 18012 Granada, Spain
5
Spanish Network of Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Granada’s Node, Institute of Health Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2020, 7(11), 230; https://doi.org/10.3390/children7110230
Submission received: 31 October 2020 / Revised: 12 November 2020 / Accepted: 13 November 2020 / Published: 17 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Research in Childhood Nutrition)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The prevalence of childhood obesity continues to increase. Screen time, one of the most documented reasons for the obesogenic environment, enhances childhood obesity, since advertisements for unhealthy food products are still broadcast on channels for children. This is presently one of the main challenges for the government in Spain, since the current laws and obligations are not updated. This study aims to analyze food advertising aimed at children on Spanish television in 2013 and 2018 on children’s and general channels to test the effect of laws and obligations over time. In total, we viewed 512 h of the most viewed channels, two children’s and two general channels, during the week and on weekends during specific periods of 2013 and 2018. Food advertising was categorized as core, non-core, and other food advertisement (CFA, NCFA, and OFA, respectively) according to the nutritional profile. A total of 2935 adverts were analyzed, 1263 in 2013 and 1672 in 2018. A higher proportion of NCFAs were broadcast on children’s channels than in prior years, rising from 52.2% to 69.8% (p < 0.001). Nowadays, the risk of watching NCFAs on children’s channels compared to general channels turns out to be higher (Odds ratio > 2.5; p < 0.001), due to exposure to adverts for high-sugar and high-fat foods such as cakes, muffins, cookies, and fried and frozen meals rich in fat. In conclusion, the trends of nutritional profiles in food advertising on television are worsening over time, since the prevalence of NCFAs was higher in 2018 than in 2013. Currently, CFAs are not mainly broadcast on children’s channels, confirming high-risk exposure to non-core food advertising by watching them. Thus, food advertising laws and obligations should be adapted to increase compliance.

1. Introduction

The prevalence of childhood obesity increased in Europe from 1975 to 2016 [1,2]. In Spain, around 40% of children aged 3–8 years are overweight, and probably will become obese later in life [3]. This follows from the knowledge that screen time (ST) enhances childhood obesity by reinforcing unhealthy habits such as being sedentary when watching TV and posing a higher risk of exposure to advertisements for unhealthy food, and high energy intake while watching TV [4,5] is one of the most documented reasons for the obesogenic environment [6,7,8].

1.1. Consumer and Food Socialization in Childhood

Television, as an excellent means of mass communication, is considered as an instrument of socialization, a modeler of consciences, and an instigator of public behavior [9]. Currently, school-aged children spend more time watching television than the internet both during school days and on weekends [10]. Accordingly, TV food advertising has increased over time. It is a fact that marketing companies know that many children make decisions after being seduced by features in food adverts [11], and it is also known that food marketing influences people’s preferences for consuming healthy or non-healthy foods [12]. For example, junk food companies try to get children’s attention through rewards not related to the nutritional content of food [13]. Additionally, it is common to see adverts for high-sugar foods during children’s viewing times at school time compared to holidays [14]. Recent studies show that reducing TV time protects against childhood obesity at 7 years [15], while exposure to advertisements for high-energy food determines the energy balance, leading children to become overweight [16].

1.2. Food Advertising Influence and Literacy

Food advertising influences children’s attitudes and consumption preferences [12]. Emotional development is considered as an important determinant of human behavior [17]. Some neuromarketing studies associate the neural-brain network with emotions [18,19]. It is known that the duration and frequency of exposure to food advertising predicts final decision making [20,21]. Food companies focus on sugary products, since it helps them gain customer loyalty by stimulating the reward-processing circuitry of the brain in a similar pattern to addictive drugs [22], disabling the response to satiety [23,24]. For example, fast food is developed in very clever ways to make it addictive and very difficult to stop eating [25]. Furthermore, a rapid and continued drop in sugar intake is associated with similar symptoms as tobacco cessation [26]. A similar study [27] found that exposure to images of food like chocolate has a higher physiological effect. As children are underdeveloped and relatively inexperienced as consumers, they are more susceptible to advertising influence compared to adults [28]. Children are best approached though traditional media, like cartoons [29], and consequently, a large body of research has investigated children´s susceptibility to persuasive food advertising in TV [30,31,32,33]. Food advertising literacy is an effective intervention to cope with the unhealthy effects of food advertising [34]. Food-focused advertising literacy increases children’s knowledge of nutrition [35], then, many schools teach children how to cope with these commercials from the age of eight [36]. Additionally, individual socio-economic status influences food literacy skills, thus people suffering from social inequalities are more likely to show limited food literacy [37].

1.3. Regulatory Laws and WHO Recommendations

The current Spanish public health law was passed in 2011. It aims to protect children against unhealthy food advertising, concentrating efforts on reducing childhood obesity and enhancing healthy and active lifestyles, including moderate ST and regular family meal times, and recommends regular exercise to support physical and psychological health [38]. Early life habits are an accurate target for prevention, and this is presently one of the main challenges for the government in Spain, which has worked to implement a law for childhood obesity, which can be summarized in four points: (1) Reforming the Code for Regulation of the Advertising of Food and Beverages (PAOS code) for advertising self-regulation; (2) reducing added sugars; (3) using nutritional labelling following the Nutri-Core model [39]; and (4) updating the latest law (Spanish law 17/2011 for food safety) to ban unhealthy food and beverages in schools, as well as in hospitals, primary healthcare locations, and health administrations.
The development of pledges by the food industry is expanding around the world. The PAOS code, directed to children in Spain, is part of a national strategy for promoting healthy nutrition and physical activity to prevent obesity and enhance children´s healthy habits. It is a self-regulating code for food advertising in Spain created by companies in 2005 that unfortunately has not been modified since 2012 [40]. Some limitations and inconsistencies have been found, such as the choice of whether or not to participate and the self-regulating by companies [41].
The European Commission addressed the long-term effectiveness of such strategies, evolving a process for monitoring the extent and nature of food advertising to children and its regulation, and amending the EU’s Television Without Frontiers Directive to protect children from advertisements for unhealthy food when they are watching TV [42].
The World Health Organization recommends no more than 1 h of sedentary ST for children aged 2–12 years, and never at mealtimes [43]. Recent studies show an increase in advertising for fast foods and high-sugar foods in recent years [44,45,46]. Additionally, on both children’s and general channels, children are at high risk of watching adverts for unhealthy foods, which explains the high prevalence of childhood obesity [16].
Recent studies on TV advertising of food for children in Spain were focused on evaluating the latest approved laws and checking for compliance, finding significant increases in unhealthy food shown to children [47,48,49,50,51]. Consequently, some products, such as child-targeted packaged foods, are changing according to the latest obligations, although these changes are not enough [52]. Given the limitations of self-regulatory agreements for food advertising and their consequences to public health [53], a more evidence-based longitudinal approach is needed to highlight them.
Following the effort by the government to regulate this issue, our study aims to confirm a healthier trend in the nutritional profiles of food adverts shown on children’s channels compared to previous years, and to confirm a low risk of exposure to non-core food advertising on children’s and general channels. If these are confirmed, it shows that the long-term effects of the latest Spanish laws are contributing to address this public concern. Hence, this study investigated the nutritional profiles of food advertising on Spanish TV from 2013 to 2018 for the following purposes: (1) To compare the prevalence of non-core food advertising in 2013 against 2018; (2) to check the current broadcasting of core and non-core advertising on children’s and general channels; and (3) to test the effect of the latest Spanish laws and obligations on restricting food advertising in the most-viewed frame for children.

2. Materials and Methods

Spanish TV broadcasts were analyzed for 2 time points, 2013 and 2018. This involves the time between the last publication of Spanish food advertising regulations and the imminent publication of the new law for childhood obesity. A total of 3152 adverts were recorded over 512 h. The 2 most-watched Spanish channels for children (Disney Channel and Boing) and channels for all ages (Antena 3 and Telecinco), which allow advertising, were assessed. The period of the study was 2 months (April and May) for both 2013 and 2018. They were recorded on 4 consecutive days (2 weekdays and 2 weekend days, from 06:00 to 22:00). Food advertising broadcast from 06:00 to 07:00 was defined as outside the timeline or not analyzed since it is sleep time, thus that food advertising was not used. Consequently, after removing 217 adverts, the study comprised a total of 2935 adverts, 1263 in 2013 and 1672 in 2018. Adverts shown in children’s peak time slots (07:00–08:59 and 15:30–22:00 on weekdays, 07:30–10:29 and 15:30–22:00 on weekend days) and nonpeak time slots (09:00–15:29 on weekdays, 10:30–15:29 on weekend days) were also analyzed according to a previous study [50].
Each advertisement was analyzed and evaluated with predefined coding based on an inductive methodology (categorized from particular to general food and beverage features) according to the previous literature [49]. If possible, each advertisement was initially classified according to the nutritional composition of the food by nutrition labelling and later was included in the 3 main categories of adverts (core, non-core, and other). In particular, criteria were related to the nutritional quantity and quality of the foods and beverages being advertised, healthy habits or references after checking each recipe (Table 1), and nutraceutical products advertised in the Open Food Facts—Spain food products database [54]. Finally, food adverts were recorded and categorized according to a methodology based on a validated coding system [13,49], as follows: Core food advertisement (CFA; (low in energy and nutrient-dense), non-core food advertisement (NCFA; high in energy, with an unbalanced energy profile), and other food advertisement (OFA; special food like vitamins, supplements and baby formulas, and supermarkets) (Table S1). Healthy adverts were defined as those that promote physical activity or other healthy lifestyle habits [47,50], after checking the labels of the foods and beverages advertised.
The research staff involved two nutritionists previously trained in classifying food and beverage adverts, and informatics and statistical scientists were in charge of making the TV records and the statistical analysis, respectively. A previous test was done to check their training for analyzing food advertising, thus pairwise comparison was done to confirm the validity of the nutritional analysis. WMP v.11 (SRS Labs. Inc. Santa Ana, CA, USA, 2013) and Excel v.2016 software (Microsoft Building Redmond, WA, USA) were used in the analysis, and the statistical analysis was done with IBM SPSS (IBM Corp. Released 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY, USA). All adverts were stored in an HDD model Ciga HD 2TB that was programmed to record for 4 days in the time slots described above.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analyses included descriptive analysis to show the frequencies and rates of all variables and bivariate analysis through a contingency chart with χ2 test to assess the relationship between frequencies and relative risk. For the analysis of the trend of nutritional profiles of food advertising (TNPFA) at different time points, first a study of normality was conducted, testing the non-normal distribution by the Kolmogorov–Smirnoff test, followed by the Mann–Whitney nonparametric U-test to compare medians and interquartile range of the nutrients at each time point, considering results significant at p < 0.05 in all analyses.
The medians for TNPFA at different time points were calculated according to the nutritional profiles of advertised foods, and the broadcast frequency was used a correction factor in this analysis as shown in the following equation:
TNPFA   =   Nutritional   contents   of   food   advertised   ( g   and   kcal )   100   g   of   food   ×   Broadcast   Frequency

3. Results

A total of 2935 adverts were analyzed (1263 in 2013 and 1672 in 2018) (Figure S1). The food adverts in the two years were significantly different. In 2018, a higher proportion of NCFAs were broadcast on children’s channels than years ago, rising from 52.2% to 69.8% (p < 0.001). OFAs increased from 0.7% to 15.7% (p < 0.001). Moreover, a higher proportion of CFAs were seen on general channels, increasing from 23.7% to 29.7% (p < 0.001), and OFAs decreased from 19% to 12.4% (p < 0.001). Similar trends were found for NCFAs on general channels (Figure 1).
A comparative analysis over time showed that adverts for fruit products without added sugar were not shown on children’s channels during 2018, while in 2013 their proportion was 30/579 (p < 0.001). Similarly, adverts with a higher content of fried foods were shown more in 2018 than 2013 (33/779 vs. 7/579; p < 0.001). Adverts for cakes, muffins, cookies, high-fat crackers, pies, and pastries were shown more on children’s channels than general channels in 2018 (40/779 vs. 13/893), contrary to 2013 (1/579 vs. 55/684; p < 0.001). Adverts showing healthy habits were not broadcast in different proportions on children’s channels and general channels (14/779 vs. 23/893; p < 0.001) (Table 1). Adverts for sugary drinks, high-sugar cereals, and chocolate followed a worse trend on general channels (p < 0.001).
The nutritional profile of NCFAs in 2018 was poorer than years ago, since the foods were higher in energy, carbohydrates, and sugar (p < 0.001). CFAs had a better nutritional profile in 2018 than 2013 (p < 0.001) (Table 2).
The analysis of advertising on children’s channels over time shows a higher risk of exposure to NCFAs, such as adverts for ice cream, high-fat meats, cakes, high-sugar cereals, and chocolate (p < 0.001) in 2018 than 2013 (Table S2); conversely, adverts for healthy habits show a higher risk of exposure on children’s channels in 2013 than 2018 (Relative risk (RR) = 4.901; Confidence interval (CI): 2.740–8.767; p < 0.001; data not shown). In addition, the results show that watching children’s channels posed a high risk of exposure to adverts for high-sugar and high-fat foods like cakes, muffins, cookies, and breaded and frozen meals rich in fat (p < 0.001), but was protective for exposure to fast food meals and restaurants (Table S3). Otherwise, there was a higher risk of exposure to adverts for sugar-sweetened drinks when watching general channels (Odds ratio (OR) = 34.894; CI = 5.004–266.011; p < 0.001; data not shown).

4. Discussion

This study used a longitudinal approach to observe the trend of nutritional profiles and the content of food advertising for children on Spanish TV, contributing to the current knowledge in this field. Overall, our results suggest that the nutritional quality of the food in adverts and the spread of unhealthy food advertising on TV channels for children are worsening over time. This association is explained by the higher risk of exposure to NCFAs on children’s channels than years ago, compared to general channels. Despite the latest improvements in laws against these activities, advertising of unhealthy foods has become more aggressive in both frequency and focus, in agreement with other studies [55]. Contrary to our review [44,45,46], the results show a low risk of exposure to fast food adverts on children’s channels, but there is still a high risk of exposure to adverts for high-sugar and high-fat foods, as concluded in previous research [14,22]. Moreover, health-oriented adverts such as for physical activity or healthy eating plans do not often appear on children’s channels; their trend decreased compared to 2013. This confirms that new actions should be developed since current regulations are not adequate, in line with what other authors have proposed [56]. Thus, there is a chance to develop effective social responsibility programs for sugary beverage advertising by the food industry and the governments [57].
Given the WHO’s recommendations for ST in 2019, it is worrying that 50% of children exceed these recommendations [58]. Furthermore, it is expected that sedentary activities and screen time are being extended according to social distancing guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic [59], which is worrying since exposure to NCFAs is increasing. In light of this, a new problem appears related to children’s ST with general channels, since the results in this study show that there is a high risk of exposure to fast food advertising when watching these channels.
Recent studies using electroencephalographic techniques found an association between exposure to food pictures and decision making [60]. Additionally, eye-tracking was recently used in several studies in different areas like health, tourism, technology, and computing, finding important applications [61,62,63,64]. A recent study emphasized developing strategies to strengthen children’s coping skills and dispositional (associative network consisting of cognitive, moral, and affective beliefs) and situational (actual recognition of and critical reflection) attributions related to advertising [65]. Consequently, new technological applications are focused on getting children’s attention through mobiles, video games, and social networks, among others, and creating a working platform for prevention programs to control food advertising. Currently, food companies are developing apps based on nutritional databases to categorize food, such as more or less adequate, and this path provides an opportunity to promote nutritional education for consumers to be able to effectively judge food advertising. This is a great opportunity to standardize and check such databases and apps by law, hence it could help to control food adverts and improve nutritional education for children and parents.

4.1. Policy Implications

Prevention of overweight and obesity is a key target in contemporary health care [66]. Food advertising and childhood health are among the biggest concerns for the government, since food advertising shown on TV is imbalanced and could be promoting a high risk of obesity [67]. Consequently, TV food advertising should be involved in the new TV spaces that consider a sequence of health interventions such as developing programs in high-quality contents. Additionally, easy and clear messages should be promoted, and adequate food advertising literacy that protects children into the evidence-based approach to increase the effectiveness of the strategies should be encouraged. It must also allow a mobilized society, with the necessary practicality and feasibility, to change the government and the food industry, since their current positions are inappropriate [68,69].
Until now, not enough has been done to ensure that children are protected from high exposure to unhealthy food advertising. Our results provide arguments to improve the law for food advertising to children. For example, the main policy implication goes through the development of new pledges, since the current state of pledges by the food industry suggests improvement through mandatory participation or laws for reducing exposure and re-addressing the power of food advertising [49]. Moreover, strategies to prevent childhood obesity related to TV advertising should use an evidence-based approach in order to succeed. For example, the effectiveness of “protective” messages in food advertising for children is under question because the results are not as expected [70]. This may be because healthy messages shown in food advertisements on TV do not usually receive attention, since they always appear in illegible type for only a short time. This suggests focusing on the programs most watched by children, taking actions that prioritize health concerns above all else, such as developing educational programs on nutritional food and healthy habits, having four daily meals, portion sizes, dairy product consumption, fruits and vegetables, water, and the importance of physical activity, to address the problem [71,72,73,74]. Likewise, interventions should be supervised by governments, since the nutritional education provided by food companies is considered misleading and inconsistent with the appropriate advice [75,76]. The results of this study provide new knowledge in line with the finding of other European projects, to promote the adoption of a commonly agreed European Union definition of ‘unhealthy’ food [46].
The interest of the food industry in the management of pledges for advertising is confirmed [77] by an increase in the number of TV adverts compared to years ago, as the results of our study show. The government of Spain continues to support self-regulation following the PAOS code [40,52]. The major limitations of the current pledges are the self-regulation and the voluntary involvement by companies, showing that these pledges are not effective since they represent a risk of not protecting children against the harmful effects of food advertising. For example, self-regulation is intended to redefine “child-directed advertising” to reduce television advertising of unhealthy foods [78]. The results in this study are in line with the World Health Organization’s statement that “self-regulatory or voluntary schemes often have a narrow scope, weak criteria and limited government oversight” [79], which highlights the ethical and political issues that arise when important food and beverage companies continue to exploit the policy space created. For example, the Coca-Cola Company has been criticized for promoting physical activity to distract attention from its products [76]. According to a study developed at King’s College London, the lack of commitment to this target is due to the idea of corporate social responsibility in the age of obesity, since companies are selling health as “brand value,” shifting the blame from food to diet and from diet to sedentariness, proving a lack of responsibility. Thus, obesity prevention has become a veritable industry in itself managed by the food and drink industry [80].
Other specific actions include developing educational programs for children, but families and institutions should also be included in the regulatory guidelines [81]; this is an opportunity to redirect the use of tech devices towards more healthy practices being offered. Parents, food companies, governments, and other institutions must join efforts on a large scale to favor the behavioral challenge for food advertisement literacy [73,82], since the legal regulations can potentially make positive cost-effective intervention when television advertising of high-fat, high-sugar, and high-salt foods and beverages to children is restricted [83,84]. Consumers, legislators, and the media must be informed about unfair approaches used by food and beverage companies and fast food chains, since the obesogenic environment continues to expand [85], just as food advertising literacy should be considered for them [36]
Consequently, governments have to recommend “healthy” TV viewing habits, such as by notifying parents about the potential for TV to displace time spent in physical activity and advising them to not allow their children to watch TV or devices during meals [86]. Children who have high physical activity levels, low screen time (ST), and healthy eating habits are at lower risk of becoming obese adults, thus they must be the examples to prevent the obesogenic environment [87], so TV advertising should at least consider running adverts for healthy habits like engaging in physical activity and eating healthy food during peak slots for children.

4.2. Limitations and Strengths

Some perceived limitations of this study could be related to the lack of interesting advert features, as the context of the programs on which the adverts were broadcast, the time they were broadcast, and their “protective” message, as well as the lack of covariates related to food choices (well-known children’s characters, athletes, movie celebrities, gifts and discounts for purchasing products) were not analyzed. Another limitation is the relatively small period of analysis (only three months per year); because advertising during the summer months was not analyzed, the potential number of adverts could be different, since both children’s schedules and advert contents would be different on holidays. Besides, since this is not an intervention study, the children’s perceptions after viewing food advertisements were not evaluated, which could be a key point to consider for future studies. The main strength of our study is to analyze current food advertising compared with advertising from years ago, under the same methods. Additionally, the results in this study demand deep research into the utility of literacy interventions in food advertising for the promotion of healthy eating. As such, the future policy guidelines should attend to the follows main points related to food advertising literacy: (1) Need to develop a healthy advertising disclosure in new TV spaces, (2) increasing the general knowledge about healthy and unhealthy food advertising during childhood and developing school interventions to children on how to cope with unhealthy food advertising, (3) increasing parent’s advertising literacy, (4) increasing awareness among food companies and advertising professionals, and (5) increasing citizen awareness of complaint mechanisms.

5. Conclusions

The trend of nutritional profiles in food advertising on Spanish television for children has worsened over the years. CFAs were mainly not broadcast on channels for children, while NCFAs were broadcast more in 2018 than 2013. Currently, watching children’s channels is a risk factor for exposure to NCFAs. Thus, food advertising regulations should be adopted to increase compliance.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/7/11/230/s1, Figure S1: Number of food advertisements broadcast in 2013 and 2018, Table S1: Encoding frames for food advertising categories and criteria for classification according to food nutritional profile advertised, Table S2: Relative risk of seeing non-core food adverts on children’s TV channels in 2018 vs. 2013, Table S3: Odds ratios of exposure to non-core food adverts on children’s and general TV channels in 2018.

Author Contributions

All authors have collaborated to the achievement of this manuscript. The specific contributions are the following: Conceptualization, D.C. and C.C.; data curation, D.C., M.E.-M., C.M.S., F.J.T.-E., and H.A.; formal analysis, D.C. and C.M.S.; funding acquisition, A.C. and C.C.; investigation, D.C. and C.M.S.; methodology, D.C. and C.C.; project administration, A.C. and C.C.; resources, D.C., M.E.-M., C.M.S., and F.J.T.-E.; software, M.E.-M., C.M.S., F.J.T.-E., and H.A.; supervision, A.C. and C.C.; validation, D.C. and C.C.; visualization, A.C. and C.C.; writing—original draft, D.C.; writing—review and editing, D.C., A.C., and C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Commission of the European Community’s 7th Framework Programme (FP7/2008-2013), grant agreement no. 212652 (NUTRIMENTHE project), within the 6th Framework Programme, contract no. 007036 (EARNEST project), and supported in part by the Commission of the European Community within the 5th Framework Programme, contract no. QLK1-CT-1999-00888 (NUHEAL project). This publication is the work of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission of the European Community. The funders had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge all of the partners for their support: EURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, Biomedical Research Centre and Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine at the University of Granada. The results of this article are likely to be included in the D.C.’s doctoral thesis for the Biomedicine Program of the Doctoral School of Health Sciences at the University of Granada.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abarca-Gómez, L.; Abdeen, Z.A.; Hamid, Z.A.; Abu-Rmeileh, N.M.; Acosta-Cazares, B.; Acuin, C.; Adams, R.J.; Aekplakorn, W.; Afsana, K.; Aguilar-Salinas, C.; et al. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 2017, 390, 2627–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Strauss, R.S. Epidemic Increase in Childhood Overweight, 1986–1998. JAMA 2001, 286, 2845–2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Aranceta-Bartrina, J.; Gianzo-Citores, M.; Pérez-Rodrigo, C. Prevalencia de sobrepeso, obesidad y obesidad abdominal en población española entre 3 y 24 años. Estudio ENPE. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2020, 73, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Penso, I.; Luna, A.; Campa, A.; Palacios, C. Comparison Between Total Energy Intake and Screen Time Among U.S Children Based on NHANES 2015–2016 Data. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2020, 4, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fang, K.; Mu, M.; Liu, K.; He, Y. Screen time and childhood overweight/obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Care Health Dev. 2019, 45, 744–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Epstein, L.H.; Roemmich, J.N.; Robinson, J.L.; Paluch, R.A.; Winiewicz, D.D.; Fuerch, J.H.; Robinson, T.N. A Randomized Trial of the Effects of Reducing Television Viewing and Computer Use on Body Mass Index in Young Children. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2008, 162, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Robinson, T.N.; Banda, J.A.; Hale, L.; Lu, A.S.; Fleming-Milici, F.; Calvert, S.L.; Wartella, E. Screen Media Exposure and Obesity in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics 2017, 140, S97–S101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Council on Communications and Media. Children, Adolescents, Obesity, and the Media. Pediatrics 2011, 128, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Moreno, P.D.C.; Vizcaíno-Verdú, A.; Aguaded, J.I. La televisión sensacionalista y hábitos de consumo en España e Italia. Estud. Sobre Mensaje Periodís. 2020, 26, 483–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Fernández, B.F.; González, A.G. La confluencia mediática en la vida de los niños. El consumo de televisión e internet por parte de los menores gallegos de 11 y 12 años. Sphera Publica 2014, 2, 61–79. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pechmann, C.; Catlin, J.R. The effects of advertising and other marketing communications on health-related consumer behaviors. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2016, 10, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Smith, R.; Kelly, B.; Yeatman, H.; Boyland, E. Food marketing influences children’s attitudes, preferences and consumption: A systematic critical review. Nutrients 2019, 11, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Whalen, R.; Harrold, J.; Child, S.; Halford, J.; Boyland, E. The Health Halo Trend in UK Television Food Advertising Viewed by Children: The Rise of Implicit and Explicit Health Messaging in the Promotion of Unhealthy Foods. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Arora, A.; Bowman, C.M.; Chow, S.J.; Thepsourinthone, J.; Bhole, S.; Manohar, N. A content analysis of Australian television advertising: Focus on child and adolescent oral health. BMC Pediatr. 2018, 18, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bawaked, R.A.; Fernández-Barrés, S.; Navarrete-Muñoz, E.M.; González-Palacios, S.; Guxens, M.; Irizar, A.; Lertxundi, A.; Sunyer, J.; Vioque, J.; Schröder, H. Impact of lifestyle behaviors in early childhood on obesity and cardiometabolic risk in children: Results from the Spanish INMA birth cohort study. Pediatr. Obes. 2019, e12590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Norman, J.; Kelly, B.; McMahon, A.-T.; Boyland, E.; Baur, L.A.; Chapman, K.; King, L.; Hughes, C.; Bauman, A. Sustained impact of energy-dense TV and online food advertising on children’s dietary intake: A within-subject, randomised, crossover, counter-balanced trial. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2018, 15, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Etkin, A.; Büchel, C.; Gross, J.J. The neural bases of emotion regulation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015, 16, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Val-Laillet, D.; Aarts, E.; Weber, B.; Ferrari, M.; Quaresima, V.; Stoeckel, L.; Alonso-Alonso, M.; Audette, M.; Malbert, C.-H.; Stice, E. Neuroimaging and neuromodulation approaches to study eating behavior and prevent and treat eating disorders and obesity. NeuroImage Clin. 2015, 8, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Carnell, S.; Benson, L.; Pantazatos, S.P.; Hirsch, J.; Geliebter, A. Amodal brain activation and functional connectivity in response to high-energy-density food cues in obesity. Obesity 2014, 22, 2370–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Stasi, A.; Songa, G.; Mauri, M.; Ciceri, A.; Diotallevi, F.; Nardone, G.; Russo, V. Neuromarketing empirical approaches and food choice: A systematic review. Food Res. Int. 2018, 108, 650–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. World Health Organization. Set of Recommendations on the Marketing of Foods and Non-Alcoholic Beverages to Children; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  22. DiNicolantonio, J.J.; O’Keefe, J.H.; Wilson, W.L. Sugar addiction: Is it real? A narrative review. Br. J. Sports Med. 2018, 52, 910–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Siep, N.; Roefs, A.; Roebroeck, A.; Havermans, R.; Bonte, M.L.; Jansen, A. Hunger is the best spice: An fMRI study of the effects of attention, hunger and calorie content on food reward processing in the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex. Behav. Brain Res. 2009, 198, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tuulari, J.J.; Karlsson, H.K.; Hirvonen, J.; Salminen, P.; Nuutila, P.; Nummenmaa, L. Neural circuits for cognitive appetite control in healthy and obese individuals: An fMRI study. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mohiuddin, A.K.; Nasirullah, M. Fast Food Addiction: A Major Public Health Issue. ARC J. Addict. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bray, G.A. Is sugar addictive? Diabetes 2016, 65, 1797–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Rodriguez, S.; Fernandez, M.C.; Cepeda-Benito, A.; Vila, J. Subjective and physiological reactivity to chocolate images in high and low chocolate cravers. Biol. Psychol. 2005, 70, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zarouali, B.; De Pauw, P.; Ponnet, K.; Walrave, M.; Poels, K.; Cauberghe, V.; Hudders, L. Considering children’s advertising literacy from a methodological point of view: Past practices and future recommendations. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 2019, 40, 196–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Daems, K.; Moons, I.; De Pelsmacker, P. Co-creating advertising literacy awareness campaigns for minors. Young Consum. 2017, 18, 54–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Folkvord, F.; Anschütz, D.J.; Boyland, E.; Kelly, B.; Buijzen, M. Food advertising and eating behavior in children. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2016, 9, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Naderer, B.; Binder, A.; Matthes, J.; Mayrhofer, M. Healthy, sweet, brightly colored, and full of vitamins: Cognitive and affective persuasive cues of food placements and children’s healthy eating behavior. Int. J. Advert. 2020, 39, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tarabashkina, L.; Quester, P.; Crouch, R. Food advertising, children’s food choices and obesity: Interplay of cognitive defences and product evaluation: An experimental study. Int. J. Obes. 2016, 40, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Folkvord, F.; Anschütz, D.J.; Buijzen, M. Attentional bias for food cues in advertising among overweight and hungry children: An explorative experimental study. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020, 79, 103792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rozendaal, E. Improving advertising literacy and effectiveness. In The Psychology of Food Marketing and Overeating; Routledge: London, UK, 2019; pp. 76–93. [Google Scholar]
  35. Nelson, M.R.; Kehr, D.P. Food-focused advertising literacy can increase nutrition knowledge in elementary school students. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2016, 48, 749–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Vanwesenbeeck, I.; Wolf, D.; Lambrecht, I.; Hudders, L.; Cauberghe, V.; Adams, B.; Lissens, S. Minors’ Advertising Literacy in Relation to New Advertising Formats: Identification and Assessment of the Risks; AdLit SBO: Lummen, Belgium, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  37. Palumbo, R.; Adinolfi, P.; Annarumma, C.; Catinello, G.; Tonelli, M.; Troiano, E.; Vezzosi, S.; Manna, R. Unravelling the food literacy puzzle: Evidence from Italy. Food Policy 2019, 83, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jefatura del Estado de España. Ley 17/2011, de 5 de julio, de seguridad alimentaria y nutrición. Bol. Ofic. Estado 2011, 160, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  39. Julia, C.; Etilé, F.; Hercberg, S. Front-of-pack Nutri-Score labelling in France: An evidence-based policy. Lancet Public Health 2018, 3, e164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. González Díaz, C. Autorregulación en la publicidad de alimentos para niños a través de PAOS: Un estudio internacional. Cuadernos Info 2013, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hawkes, C.; Harris, J.L. An analysis of the content of food industry pledges on marketing to children. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 14, 1403–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Matthews, A.E. Children and obesity: A pan-European project examining the role of food marketing. Eur. J. Public Health 2008, 18, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. World Health Organization. Guidelines on Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Sleep for Children under 5 Years of Age; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mejía-Díaz, D.M.; Carmona-Garcés, I.C.; Giraldo-López, P.A.; González-Zapata, L. Contenido nutricional de alimentos y bebidas publicitados en la franja infantil de la televisión colombiana. Nutr. Hosp. 2014, 29, 858–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Whalen, R.; Harrold, J.; Child, S.; Halford, J.; Boyland, E. Children’s exposure to food advertising: The impact of statutory restrictions. Health Promot. Int. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Boyland, E.J.; Whalen, R. Food advertising to children and its effects on diet: Review of recent prevalence and impact data. Pediatr. Diabetes 2015, 16, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Campos, D.; Hernández-Torres, J.J.; Agil, A.; Comino, M.; López, J.C.; Macías, V.; Campoy, C. Analysis of food advertising to children on Spanish television: Probing exposure to television marketing. Arch. Med. Sci. AMS 2016, 12, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Franco, M.; Sanz, B.; Otero, L.; Domínguez-Vila, A.; Caballero, B. Prevention of childhood obesity in Spain: A focus on policies outside the health sector. SESPAS report 2010. Gaceta Sanit. 2010, 24, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kelly, B.; Halford, J.C.; Boyland, E.J.; Chapman, K.; Bautista-Castaño, I.; Berg, C.; Caroli, M.; Cook, B.; Coutinho, J.G.; Effertz, T. Television food advertising to children: A global perspective. Am. J. Public Health 2010, 100, 1730–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kelly, B.; Hattersley, L.; King, L.; Flood, V. Persuasive food marketing to children: Use of cartoons and competitions in Australian commercial television advertisements. Health Promot. Int. 2008, 23, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Romero-Fernández, M.M.; Royo-Bordonada, M.Á.; Rodríguez-Artalejo, F. Compliance with self-regulation of television food and beverage advertising aimed at children in Spain. Public Health Nutr. 2010, 13, 1013–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ponce, G.D.R.; de Ayala, M.C.L. TV Food Advertising to Minors in Spain: Monitoring of the PAOS Code. J. Comun. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. León-Flández, K.; Rico-Gómez, A.; Moya-Geromin, M.; Romero-Fernández, M.; Bosqued-Estefania, M.; Damián, J.; López-Jurado, L.; Royo-Bordonada, M. Evaluation of compliance with the Spanish Code of self-regulation of food and drinks advertising directed at children under the age of 12 years in Spain, 2012. Public Health 2017, 150, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Team OFF. Available online: www.openfoodfacts.org (accessed on 26 March 2018).
  55. Ponce-Blandón, J.A.; Pabón-Carrasco, M.; Lomas-Campos, M.d.l.M. Análisis de contenido de la publicidad de productos alimenticios dirigidos a la población infantil. Gaceta Sanit. 2017, 31, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gorski, M.T.; Roberto, C.A. Public health policies to encourage healthy eating habits: Recent perspectives. J. Healthc. Leadersh. 2015, 7, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Dorfman, L.; Cheyne, A.; Friedman, L.C.; Wadud, A.; Gottlieb, M. Soda and tobacco industry corporate social responsibility campaigns: How do they compare? PLoS Med. 2012, 9, e1001241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. ESPAÑA MDS. Informe Anual del Sistema Nacional de Salud; Servicios Sociales e Igualdad: Madrid, Spain, 2012.
  59. Rundle, A.G.; Park, Y.; Herbstman, J.B.; Kinsey, E.W.; Wang, Y.C. COVID-19–Related School Closings and Risk of Weight Gain Among Children. Obesity 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Khushaba, R.N.; Wise, C.; Kodagoda, S.; Louviere, J.; Kahn, B.E.; Townsend, C. Consumer neuroscience: Assessing the brain response to marketing stimuli using electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye tracking. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40, 3803–3812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hernández-Méndez, J.; Muñoz-Leiva, F. What type of online advertising is most effective for eTourism 2.0? An eye tracking study based on the characteristics of tourists. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 50, 618–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Resnick, M.; Albert, W. The impact of advertising location and user task on the emergence of banner ad blindness: An eye-tracking study. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2014, 30, 206–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Velazquez, C.E.; Pasch, K.E. Attention to food and beverage advertisements as measured by eye-tracking technology and the food preferences and choices of youth. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2014, 114, 578–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, Q.; Yang, S.; Liu, M.; Cao, Z.; Ma, Q. An eye-tracking study of website complexity from cognitive load perspective. Decis. Support Syst. 2014, 62, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hudders, L.; De Pauw, P.; Cauberghe, V.; Panic, K.; Zarouali, B.; Rozendaal, E. Shedding new light on how advertising literacy can affect children’s processing of embedded advertising formats: A future research agenda. J. Advert. 2017, 46, 333–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chan, R.S.; Woo, J. Prevention of overweight and obesity: How effective is the current public health approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 765–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Holt, D.J.; Ippolito, P.M.; Desrochers, D.M.; Kelley, C.R.; Federal Trade Commission. Children’s Exposure to TV Advertising in 1977 and 2004: Information for the Obesity Debate; US FTC: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
  68. Swinburn, B.; Vandevijvere, S. WHO report on ending childhood obesity echoes earlier recommendations. Public Health Nutr. 2016, 19, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. World Health Organization. The First Action Plan for Food and Nutrition Policy: WHO European Region 2000–2005; WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  70. Folkvord, F.; Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F.; Codagnone, C.; Bogliacino, F.; Veltri, G.; Gaskell, G. Does a ‘protective’message reduce the impact of an advergame promoting unhealthy foods to children? An experimental study in Spain and The Netherlands. Appetite 2017, 112, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Leahy, K.E.; Birch, L.L.; Fisher, J.O.; Rolls, B.J. Reductions in entree energy density increase children’s vegetable intake and reduce energy intake. Obesity 2008, 16, 1559–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Livingstone, M.B.E.; Pourshahidi, L.K. Portion size and obesity. Adv. Nutr. 2014, 5, 829–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Nestle, M. Soda Politics: Taking on Big Soda (and Winning); Oxford University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  74. Leone, L.; Ling, T.; Baldassarre, L.; Barnett, L.M.; Capranica, L.; Pesce, C. Corporate responsibility for childhood physical activity promotion in the UK. Health Promot. Int. 2016, 31, 755–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Gómez, L.; Jacoby, E.; Ibarra, L.; Lucumí, D.; Hernandez, A.; Parra, D.; Florindo, A.; Hallal, P. Sponsorship of physical activity programs by the sweetened beverages industry: Public health or public relations? Rev. Saúde Públ. 2011, 45, 423–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Powell, D.; Gard, M. The governmentality of childhood obesity: Coca-Cola, public health and primary schools. Discourse Stud. Cult. Politics Educ. 2015, 36, 854–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Landwehr, S.C.; Hartmann, M. Industry self-regulation of food advertisement to children: Compliance versus effectiveness of the EU Pledge. Food Policy 2020, 91, 101833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Harris, J.L.; Sarda, V.; Schwartz, M.B.; Brownell, K.D. Redefining “child-directed advertising” to reduce unhealthy television food advertising. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2013, 44, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tatlow-Golden, M.; Boyland, E.; Jewell, J.; Zalnieriute, M.; Handsley, E.; Breda, J.; Galea, G. Tackling Food Marketing to Children in a Digital World: Trans-Disciplinary Perspectives; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Herrick, C. Shifting blame/selling health: Corporate social responsibility in the age of obesity. Sociol. Health Illness 2009, 31, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bammann, K.; Peplies, J.; Pigeot, I.; Ahrens, W. IDEFICS: A multicenter European project on diet-and lifestyle-related disorders in children. Med. Klin. 2007, 102, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Boulos, M.N.K.; Peng, G.; VoPham, T. An Overview of GeoAI Applications in Health and Healthcare; Springer: Berling/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  83. Brown, V.; Ananthapavan, J.; Veerman, L.; Sacks, G.; Lal, A.; Peeters, A.; Backholer, K.; Moodie, M. The Potential Cost-Effectiveness and Equity Impacts of Restricting Television Advertising of Unhealthy Food and Beverages to Australian Children. Nutrients 2018, 10, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Feng, D.; Song, H.; Esperat, M.C.; Black, I. A multicomponent intervention helped reduce sugar-sweetened beverage intake in economically disadvantaged hispanic children. Am. J. Health Promot. 2016, 30, 594–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Gertner, D.; Gertner, A.K.; Araujo, D.V.; Bahia, L.; Bouzas, I. Calories and cents: Customer value and the fight against obesity. Soc. Mark. Q. 2016, 22, 325–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cox, R.; Skouteris, H.; Rutherford, L.; Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M.; Dell, D.; Hardy, L.L. Television viewing, television content, food intake, physical activity and body mass index: A cross-sectional study of preschool children aged 2-6 years. Health Promot. J. Aust. 2012, 23, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kelishadi, R.; Heidari, Z.; Kazemi, I.; Jafari-Koshki, T.; Mansourian, M.; Motlagh, M.-E.; Heshmat, R. A hierarchical Bayesian tri-variate analysis on factors associated with anthropometric measures in a large sample of children and adolescents: The CASPIAN-IV study. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 31, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Children 07 00230 g001 550
Figure 1. Percentage of TV adverts broadcast on Spanish children’s channels (CC) [6] and general channels (GC) over time.
Figure 1. Percentage of TV adverts broadcast on Spanish children’s channels (CC) [6] and general channels (GC) over time.
Children 07 00230 g001
Table
Table 1. Proportions and frequencies of food advertising broadcast on Spanish TV in 2013 and 2018 by type of channel.
Table 1. Proportions and frequencies of food advertising broadcast on Spanish TV in 2013 and 2018 by type of channel.
Advertisement Subtypes20132018Total
Children’s Channels
n (%)		General Channels
n (%)		Children’s Channels
n (%)		General Channels
n (%)		2013
n (%)		2018
n (%)
Core Food Advertisements (CFAs)
Vegetables and vegetable products without added sugar0 (0.0) c0 (0.0) c0 (0.0) c5 (0.6) d0 (0.0) a5 (0.3) a
Bottled water1 (0.2) c9 (1.3) c0 (0.0) c6 (0.7) c10 (0.8) a6 (0.4) a
Dairy products0 (0.0) c57 (8.3) c0 (0.0) d1 (0.1) d57 (4.5) a1(0.1) d
Low-fat/reduced-fat milk, yoghurt, custard, cheese, alternatives (including probiotic drinks), infant food (excluding milk formulas)191 (33.0) c0 (0.0) c96 (12.3) d113 (12.7) d191 (15.1) a209 (12.5) d
Fruit and fruit products without added sugar30 (5.2) c12 (1.8) c0 (0.0) d15 (1.7) c42 (3.3) a15 (0.9) d
Meat and similar products0 (0.0) c22 (3.2) c2 (0.3) c17 (1.9) c22 (1.7) a19 (1.1) a
Soups, salads, and sandwiches, frozen meals, and low-fat savory sauces0 (0.0) c22 (3.2) c1 (0.1) c51 (5.7) d22 (1.7) a52 (3.1) d
Bread (including high-fiber bread and low-fat crackers), rice, pasta, and noodles0 (0.0) c32 (4.7) c0 (0.0) c34 (3.8) c32 (2.5) a34 (2.0) a
Healthy habits51 (8.8) c8 (1.2) c14 (1.8) d23 (2.6) d59 (4.7) a37 (2.2) d
TOTAL (CFA), n (%)273 (47.2) a,c162 (23.7) a,d113 (14.5) b,c265 (29.7) b,d435 (34.4) a378 (22.6) b
Non-core Food Advertisements (NCFAs)
Frozen/fried potato products0 (0.0) c0 (0.0) c0 (0.0) c0 (0.0) c0 (0.0) a0 (0.0) a
Ice cream and iced confections42 (7.3) c0 (0.0) c1 (0.1) d0 (0.0) c42 (3.3) a1 (0.1) d
Fruit juice and fruit drinks7 (1.2) c15 (2.2) c0 (0.0) c0 (0.0) d22 (1.7) a0 (0.0) d
Breaded or battered meat and similar products and high-fat frozen meals7 (1.2) c7 (1.0) c33 (4.2) d10 (1.1) c14 (1.1) a43 (2.6) d
Alcohol0 (0.0) c1 (0.1) c0 (0.0) c12 (1.3) d1 (0.1) a12 (0.7) d
Cakes, muffins, cookies, high-fat crackers, pies and pastries1 (0.2) c55 (8.0) c40 (5.1) d13 (1.5) d56 (4.4) a53 (3.2) a
Sugar-sweetened drinks, including soft drinks, cordials, sports drinks, and flavor additions0 (0.0) c17 (2.5) c0 (0.0) c40 (4.5) d17 (1.3) a40 (2.4) d
Snack foods, including chips, extruded snacks, popcorn, snack and granola bars, sugar-sweetened fruit and vegetable products, and sugar-coated or salted nuts14 (2.4) c40 (5.8) c19 (2.4) c 26 (2.9) d54 (4.3) a45 (2.7) d
High-sugar or low-fiber breakfast cereals59 (10.2) c23 (3.4) c166 (21.3) d85 (9.5) d82 (6.5) a251 (15.0) d
Whole milk, yoghurt, custard, dairy desserts, cheese and similar products136 (23.5) c71 (10.4) c152 (19.5) c72 (8.1) c207 (16.4) a224 (13.4) d
High-fat, high-sugar, high-salt spreads, oils, and high-fat savory sauces5 (0.9) c31 (4.5) c0 (0.0) d13 (1.5) d36 (2.9) a13 (0.8) d
Chocolate and confectionery5 (0.9) c60 (8.8) c108 (13.9) d145 (16.2) d65 (5.1) a253 (15.1) d
Fast-food restaurants or meals26 (4.5) c72(10.5) c25 (3.2) c101 (11.3) c98 (7.8) a126 (7.5) a
TOTAL (NCFA), n (%)302 (52.2) a,c392 (57.3) a,c544 (69.8) b,c517 (57.9) a,d694 (54.9) a1061 (63.5) b
Other Food Advertisements (OFAs)
Baby and toddler milk formulas4 (0.7) c2 (0.3) c107 (13.7) d0 (0.0) c6 (0.5) a107 (6.4) d
Vitamin and mineral supplements0 (0.0) c73 (10.7) c0 (0.0) c28 (3.1) d73 (5.8) a28 (1.7) d
Supermarkets that advertise mostly core food0 (0.0) c40 (5.8) c1 (0.1) c30 (3.4) d40 (3.2) a31 (1.9) d
Tea and coffee0 (0.0) c0 (0.0) c0 (0.0) c48 (5.4) d0 (0.0) a48 (2.9) d
Supermarkets that advertise mostly non-core food0 (0.0) c0 (0.0) c0 (0.0) c5 (0.6) d0 (0.0) a5 (0.3) a
Supermarkets with no specified food0 (0.0) c15 (2.2) c14 (1.8) d0 (0.0) d15 (1.2) a14 (0.8) a
TOTAL (OFA), n (%)4 (0.7) a,c130 (19.0) a,d122 (15.7) b,c111 (12.4) b,c134 (10.6) a233 (13.9) b
Total Food Advertisements, n (%)579 (100)684 (100)779 (100)893 (100)1263 (100)1672 (100)
a,b indicate significant differences in proportions of adverts shown in 2013 vs. 2018 for the same channel at significance level p < 0.001. c,d indicate significant differences in proportions of adverts shown between channels for the same year at significance level p < 0.001.
Table
Table 2. Trend of nutritional profiles of food advertising (TNPFA) shown on children’s channels during the period of the study.
Table 2. Trend of nutritional profiles of food advertising (TNPFA) shown on children’s channels during the period of the study.
Nutritional InformationCFANCFA
2013 (n = 192)2018 (n = 118)p2013 (n = 302)2018 (n = 599)p
XIQRXIQRXIQRXIQR
Energy (kcal)110.034.0–110.064.062.0–72.0<0.001293.0286.0–379.0383.0293.0–472.0<0.001
Lipids (g)2.70.4–2.71.00.8–2.8ns16.03.5–22.018.012.0–23.0ns
Saturated lipids (g)1.70–1.70.60.5–1.2<0.0017.51.5–15.55.03.2–11.0ns
Carbohydrates (g)14.44.0–14.48.96.7–13.0<0.00124.017.4–64.654.03.1–70.0<0.001
Sugars (g)13.53.8–13.58.96.7–12.0<0.00114.94.5–23.018.00.5–56.0<0.001
Proteins (g)6.92.9–6.42.82.6–3.1<0.0016.84.4–117.55.0–15.0ns
X, median; IQR, interquartile range; ns, non-significant. Significance level for statistical tests: p < 0.05. All nutrient contents refer to 100 g of food. Advertisements without labels were excluded from the statistical analysis.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Campos, D.; Escudero-Marín, M.; Snitman, C.M.; Torres-Espínola, F.J.; Azaryah, H.; Catena, A.; Campoy, C. The Nutritional Profile of Food Advertising for School-Aged Children via Television: A Longitudinal Approach. Children 2020, 7, 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/children7110230

AMA Style

Campos D, Escudero-Marín M, Snitman CM, Torres-Espínola FJ, Azaryah H, Catena A, Campoy C. The Nutritional Profile of Food Advertising for School-Aged Children via Television: A Longitudinal Approach. Children. 2020; 7(11):230. https://doi.org/10.3390/children7110230

Chicago/Turabian Style

Campos, Daniel, Mireia Escudero-Marín, Camila M. Snitman, Francisco J. Torres-Espínola, Hatim Azaryah, Andrés Catena, and Cristina Campoy. 2020. "The Nutritional Profile of Food Advertising for School-Aged Children via Television: A Longitudinal Approach" Children 7, no. 11: 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/children7110230

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop